- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
This section discusses what is perhaps the most popular method for obtaining the pres-
ent value of the future cash flows of a real asset. The method discounts the expected
future cash flows at a rate known as the project’s cost of capital.The cost of capital
of a project is the expected return that investors require for holding an investment with
the same risk as the project. To employ this method, one has to estimate the expected
cash flow, the expected return of the market (or factor portfolios), and the CAPM beta
(or factor betas) of the project return.6
Defining and Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method with Given Betas
The method of discounting expected cash flows at a risk-adjusted discount rate, the
risk-adjusted discount rate method,is primarily used in cases where there is a com-
parison firm or set of firms in the same line of business as the project. Managers who
use this valuation method are assuming that the returns of the traded equity of the com-
parison firm or set of firms have the same beta as the returns of the project. As shown
below, using the risk-adjusted discount rate method generally provides present values
that are consistent with the tracking portfolio approach.
6Also, as noted in an earlier footnote, the expected cash flow and present value have to be either both
positive or both negative.
-
Grinblatt
768 Titman: FinancialIII. Valuing Real Assets
11. Investing in Risky
© The McGraw
768 HillMarkets and Corporate
Projects
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
378Part IIIValuing Real Assets
For simplicity, we begin our analysis by assuming a single cash flow which is
generated in the next period. The following result describes how to calculate present
values with the risk-adjusted discount rate method.
-
Result 11.2
To find the present value of next period’s cash flow using the risk-adjusted discount ratemethod:
1.compute the expected future cash flow next period, E˜);
(C
2.compute the beta of the return of the project, ;
3.compute the expected return of the project by substituting the beta calculated in
step 2 into the tangency portfolio risk-expected return equation;
4.divide the expected future cash flow in step 1 by one plus the expected return from
step 3.
-
In
algebraic
terms
E˜
(C)
PV
1r (R r)
fTf
(11.1)
Example 11.1 illustrates how to implement the risk-adjusted discount rate method.7
Example 11.1:Using the Cost of Capital to Value a Non-Traded Subsidiary
Hot Shot Computer Corp (HSCC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Novel, Inc., has a of 1.2
when computed against the tangency portfolio.One year from now, this subsidiary has a .9
probability of being worth $10 per share and a .1 probability of being worth $20 per share.
The risk-free rate is 9 percent per year.The tangency portfolio has an expected return of 19
percent per year.What is the present value of a share of HSCC, assuming no dividend pay-
ments to the parent firm in the coming year?
Answer:The expected value per share of HSCC one year from now is
$11 .9($10) .1($20)
According to the tangency portfolio risk-expected return equation, the appropriate discount
rate is
21% per year .09 1.2(.19 .09)
The subsidiary’s present value per share is the share’s expected future value divided by one
plus the appropriate discount rate, or approximately
$11 per share
$9.09 per share
1.21
The in Example 11.1 was given to us. In general, the hallmark of the risk-adjusted
discount rate method is that it is implemented with a comparison approach, which
provides an estimate of the appropriate beta for the project by analyzing the betas of
traded comparison securities. In Example 11.1, the comparison approach would have
identified the project of 1.2 by estimating the betas of the traded stocks of compar-
ison firms in the computer industry and using some average of their betas as a proxy
for HSCC’s . Implicitly, this comparison approach assumes that the present value is
not negative or zero.
7Example 11.1 is used to value an entire subsidiary, which is a collection of projects. The risk-
adjusted discount rate method also can be used to value a single project.
Grinblatt |
III. Valuing Real Assets |
11. Investing in Risky |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Projects |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 11
Investing in Risky Projects
379
The Tracking Portfolio Method Is Implicit in the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
To understand the relation between the risk-adjusted discount rate method and track-
ing, assume that the CAPM is applied to value the Hilton casino cash flow considered
in the last section. To do this, we discount the expected cash flow, assumed to be $11.3
million, at the discount rate implied by the CAPM.
The average of the betas of the traded equity of a group of comparison casinos is
estimated to be .5. Thus, the Hilton casino cash flow is tracked by a portfolio that is
invested
50 percent in the market portfolio and
50 percent in the risk-free asset.
If the expected return on the market is 20 percent and the risk-free rate is 6 percent,
the appropriate discount rate is
.06 .5(.20 .06) .13.
Hence, the present value of the expected future cash flow is
$11.3 million/1.13 $10 million.
The 13 percent used to discount the $11.3 million expected future cash flow
from the Hilton casino is the expected return of the tracking portfolio. Hence, if one
buys enough of the tracking portfolio to have an expected future value of $11.3 mil-
lion, the tracking portfolio will cost $10 million today. This tracking portfolio con-
sists of $5 million in the market portfolio (50 percent) and $5 million in the risk-
free asset (50 percent). Thus, the discounted (or present) value of the expected future
cash flow is nothing more than the cost of acquiring the tracking portfolio’s cash
flows ($10 million) while the CAPM beta (.5) represents the proportion of the track-
ing portfolio allocated to the market portfolio, which is assumed to be the tangency
portfolio.
