- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
2.1Bank Loans
Although bank loans remain a major part of the total amount of debt that firms take
on, the volume of bank financing has shrunk drastically since the 1960s when loans,
2
along with bonds, made up about half of the corporate debt outstanding.Today, bank
loans account for about 20 percent of the debt outstanding. Major corporations with
good credit ratings have found that commercial paper, a short-term debt security, and
nonbank loans from syndicates of wealthy private investors and institutions, such as
insurance companies, are less expensive than bank debt as a way to raise funds.
Types of Bank Loans
Exhibit 2.1 shows the two general types of bank loans: lines of credit and loan com-
mitments. Harman, described in the opening vignette, now has a type of loan commit-
ment known as a revolver.
Lines of credit do not in a practical sense commit the bank to lend money because
the bank is free to quote any interest rate it wishes at the time the borrowing firm
requests funds. If the interest rate is too high, the firm will decline the available line of
credit. The more formal contract, the loan commitment, specifies a preset interest rate.
To understand the terms of a bank loan you need to have a thorough understanding of
the floating interest rates that are generally used for these loans. We turn to this topic next.
Floating Rates
Floating ratesare interest rates that change over time. Both lines of credit and loan
commitments (revolver and nonrevolver) are floating-rate loans, priced as a fixed
spread over a prevailing benchmark rate, which is the floating interest rate specified
2Many features of bank loans—for example, the description of floating rates and debt covenants—
also apply to corporate debt securities such as bonds that are held by the investing public.
-
Grinblatt
88 Titman: FinancialI. Financial Markets and
2. Debt Financing
© The McGraw
88 HillMarkets and Corporate
Financial Instruments
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
32Part IFinancial Markets and Financial Instruments
EXHIBIT2.2Benchmark Rates forFloating-Rate Loans
-
Treasury rate
The yields on U.S. Treasury securities for various maturities
ranging from 1 month to 30 years.3These yields are
computed from the on-the-run Treasuries, that is, from
the most recently auctioned Treasury issues which have the
greatest liquidity.
-
•
Treasury billsare the zero-coupon Treasury issues
with maturities that range from one month to one yearat issue. The bill rates for one-month, three-month,
and six-month maturities are the most popular
Treasury-based benchmark rates.
•
Treasury notesare the coupon-paying issues with
maturities from 1 year to 10 years at their initial
issue date.
•
Treasury bondsare the coupon-paying issues with
maturities greater than 10 years at their issue date.
Their maximum maturity is 30 years.
-
Fed
funds
rate
Federal funds are overnight loans between two financial
institutions. For example, one commercial bank may be
short of reserves, requiring it to borrow excess reserves
from another bank or a federal agency that has a surplus.
The Fed funds rate, which is strongly affected by the
actions of the Federal Reserve, is the rate at which banks
can borrow and lend these excess reserves.
-
LIBOR
As noted in Chapter 1, the London interbank offered rate
is a set of rates for different time deposits offered to major
international banks by major banks in the Eurodollar
market. One-month, three-month, or six-month LIBOR are
the most common maturities for benchmark rates. There
also is LIBID, the bid rate for interbank deposits.
-
Commercial paperrate
The yields on short-term, zero-coupon notes issued by
major corporations.
-
Prime
rate
This is a benchmark rate used by banks for some floating-
rate loans. Traditionally, the prime rate was charged by
banks to their most credit-worthy customers. The prime rate
means less now than it did in previous years because many
floating-rate loans are now linked either to the Treasury bill
rate, a commercial paper rate, or LIBOR.
in the contract. The spread usually depends on the default risk of the borrower. We
will discuss default risk in detail after describing some commonly used benchmark
rates below.
Benchmark Rates.Exhibit 2.2 describes commonly used benchmark rates. Exhibit
2.3 displays the benchmark rates that prevailed in mid-January 2001 in order of increas-
ing interest rates.
3
As of 2001, the U.S. Treasury issues only securities with up to a 10-year maturity.
Grinblatt |
I. Financial Markets and |
2. Debt Financing |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
Financial Instruments |
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 2
Debt Financing
33
EXHIBIT2.3Benchmark Rates, mid-January 2001
-
Benchmark Instrument
Maturity
Rate
-
Treasury bills
6 months
4.84%
Constant-maturity Treasury
note
10 years
4.94
Treasury bills
3 months
5.06
LIBOR
6 months
5.34
AAcommercial paper
3 months
5.50
LIBOR
3 months
5.52
AAcommercial paper
1 month
5.71
Fed funds rate
1 day
5.98
AAAcorporate bond rate
Long term
7.07
Bank prime rate
Short-term floating
9.00
Source: Federal Reserve, Jan. 2001.
Creditworthiness and Spreads.Spreads to these benchmark rates are quoted in terms
of basis points, where 100 basis points equals 1 percent. For example, the spread of a
borrower with almost no default risk might be LIBOR plus 20 basis points, which
means that if LIBOR is at 8 percent per year, the borrower pays 8.2 percent per year.
The creditworthiness of the borrower determines the spread over the benchmark rate.
For example, a firm with outstanding credit risk such as Harman International,
described in the opening vignette, was able to borrow at 20 basis points above LIBOR.
By contrast, highly leveraged companies with substantial default risk may end up bor-
rowing at a rate between 150 basis points and 400 basis points above LIBOR.
Caps, Floors, and Collars.Floating-rate lending agreements often have a cap(max-
imum interest rate) or a floor(minimum interest rate). If a loan has a spread of 50
basis points to LIBOR, and LIBOR is at 7 percent but the cap is set at 7.25 percent,
the interest rate charged on the loan over the period will be the cap interest rate, 7.25
percent, instead of the benchmark rate plus the spread, which would be 7.5 percent. A
collared floating-rate loanhas both a cap and a floor on the interest rate.
Loan Covenants
Lending agreements contain loan covenants, which are contractual restrictions imposed
on the behavior of the borrowing firm.4For instance, managers of the borrowing com-
pany may be required to meet minimum net worth constraints on a quarterly basis.5
They may face restrictions on dividend payouts or restrictions on the extent to which
they can borrow from other sources. Alternatively, they may be asked to pledge cer-
tain assets such as accounts receivable or inventory as collateral. If the firm defaults
on the loan, the bank can claim the accounts receivable or the inventory in lieu of the
forgone loan repayment.
4
Covenants will be studied in greater depth later in this chapter when we focus on bonds.
5Anet worth constraint requires book assets to exceed book liabilities by a threshold amount.
-
Grinblatt
92 Titman: FinancialI. Financial Markets and
2. Debt Financing
© The McGraw
92 HillMarkets and Corporate
Financial Instruments
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
34Part IFinancial Markets and Financial Instruments
EXHIBIT2.4Types of Leases
-
Operating lease
An agreement, usually short term, allowing the
lessee to retain the right to cancel the lease and
return the asset to the lessor.
-
Financial
lease
(or
capital
lease)
An agreement that generally extends over the life
of the asset and indicates that the lessee cannot
return the asset except with substantial penalties.
Financial leases include the leveraged lease(asset
purchase financed by a third party), direct lease
(asset purchase financed by the manufacturer of the
asset), and sale and leaseback(asset purchased from
the lessee by the lessor).
