- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
The last section derived a formula for valuing European calls.14This section illustrates
how to use the binomial model to value options that may be prematurely exercised.
These include American puts and American calls on dividend-paying stocks.
14As
suggested earlier, American calls on stocks that pay no dividends until expiration can be valued
as European calls with the method described in the last section.
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
8. Options |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 8
Options
275
American Puts
The procedure for modeling American option values with the binomial approach is sim-
ilar to that for European options. As with European options, work backward from the
right-hand side of the tree diagram. At each node in the tree diagram, look at the two
future values of the option and use risk-neutral discounting to determine the value of
the option at that node. In contrast to European options, however, this value is only the
value of the option at that node provided that the investor holds on to it one more
period. If the investor exercises the option at the node, and the underlying asset is worth
S at the node, then the value captured is S Kfor a call and K Sfor a put, rather
than the discounted risk-neutral expectation of the values at the two future nodes, as
was the case for the European option.
This suggests a way to value the option, assuming that it will be optimally exer-
cised. Working backward, at each node, compare (1) the value from early exercise
of the option with (2) the value of waiting one more period and achieving one of
two values. The value to be placed at that decision node is the larger of the exer-
cise value and the value of waiting. Example 8.6 illustrates this procedure for an
American put.
Example 8.6:Valuing an American Put
Assume that each period, the nondividend-paying stock of Chiron, a drug company, can
either double or halve in value, that is, u2, d.5.If the initial price of the stock is $20
per share and the risk-free rate is 25 percent per period, what is the value of an American
put expiring two periods from now with a strike price of $27.50?
Answer:Exhibit 8.8 outlines the path of Chiron’s stock and the option.At each node in
the diagram, the risk-neutral probabilities solve
2.5(1 )
1
1.25
Thus, = .5 throughout the problem.
In the final period, at the far right-hand side of the diagram, the stock is worth $80, $20,
or $5.From node U,where the stock price is $40 a share, the price can move to $80 (node
UU) with an associated put value of $0, or it can move to $20 (node UD), which gives a put
value of $7.50.There is no value from early exercise at node Ubecause the $40 stock price
exceeds the $27.50 strike price.This means the put option at node Uis worth the value of
the $0 and $7.50 outcomes, or
0$7.50(1 )
$3.00
1.25
From node D,where the stock price is $10 a share, early exercise leads to a put value
of $17.50.Compare this with the value from not exercising and waiting one more period,
which leads to stock prices of $20 (node UD) and $5 (node DD), and respective put values
of $7.50 and $22.50.The value of these two outcomes is
$7.50$22.50(1 )
$12.00
1.2
This is less than the value from early exercise.Therefore, the optimal exercise policy is to
exercise when the stock price hits $10 at node D.
From the leftmost node, there are two possible subsequent values for the stock.If the
stock price rises to $40 a share (node U), the put, worth $3, should not be exercised early.
If the stock price declines to $10 a share (node D), the put is worth $17.50, achieved by
early exercise.If the market sets a price for the American put, believing it will be optimally
exercised, the market value at this point would be $17.50.To value the put at the leftmost
-
Grinblatt
568 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
8. Options
© The McGraw
568 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
276 |
Part IIValuing Financial Assets |
EXHIBIT8.8 |
Binomial Tree Diagram forthe Price of Chiron Stock (Above Node) and anAmerican Put Option (Below Node) with K $27.50 and T 2 |
$80
-
UU
.5
$0
$40
-
U
.5
$20
$20
?
.5
UD
.5
?
$10
$7.50
.5
D
-
?
$5
.5
DD
$22.50
node, weight the $3.00 and $17.50 outcomes by the risk-neutral probabilities and discount
at the risk-free rate.This value is
$3.00$17.50(1 )
$8.20
1.25
Early exercise leads to a $7.50 put at this node, which is inferior.Thus, the value of the put
is $8.20, and it pays to wait another period before possibly exercising.
Note that even with the possibility of early exercise, it is still possible to track the
put option in Example 8.6 with a combination of Chiron stock and a risk-free asset.
However, the tracking portfolio here is different than it is for a European put option
with comparable features. In tracking the American put, the major difference is due
to what happens at node Din Exhibit 8.8, when early exercise is optimal. To track
the option value, do not solve for a portfolio of the stock and the risk-free security
that has a value of $3.00 if an up move occurs and $12.00 if a down move occurs,
but solve for the portfolio that has a value of $3.00 if an up move occurs and $17.50
if a down move occurs. This still amounts to solving two equations with two
unknowns. With the European option, the variation between the up and down state
is $9.00. With the American option in Example 8.6, the variation is $14.50.
Since the variation in the stock price between nodes Uand Dis $30 ($40 $10),
.3 ( $9/$30) of a share perfectly tracks a European option and .483333
(14.50/$30) of a share perfectly tracks an American option. The associated risk-
free investments solve
.3($40)1.25x$3 or x$12 for the European put
.483333($40)1.25x$3 or x$17.867 for the American put
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
8. Options |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 8
Options
277
This also implies that the European put is worth .3($20) $12 $6, which is $2.20
less than the American put. One can also compute this $2.20 difference by multiplying
1 (which is .5) by the $5.50 difference between the nonexercise value and actual value
of the American put at node Dand discounting back one period at a 25 percent rate.
