- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
7.7Summary and Conclusions
This chapter examined one of the most fundamental con-tributions to financial theory: the pricing of derivatives.The price movements of a derivative are perfectly corre-lated over short time intervals with the price movements ofthe underlying asset on which it is based. Hence, a portfo-lio of the underlying asset and a riskless security can beformed that perfectly tracks the future cash flows of the de-rivative. To prevent arbitrage, the tracking portfolio andthe derivative must have the same cost.
The no-arbitrage cost of the derivative can be com-puted in several ways. One method is direct. It forms thetracking portfolio at some terminal date and works back-ward to determine a portfolio that maintains perfect track-ing. The initial cost of the tracking portfolio is the no-arbitrage cost of the derivative. An alternative, butequivalent, approach is the risk-neutral valuation method,which assigns risk-neutral probabilities to the cash flowoutcomes of the underlying asset that are consistent withthat asset earning, on average, a risk-free return. Applyinga risk-free discount rate to the expected future cash flowsof the derivative gives its no-arbitrage present value. Bothmethods lend their unique insights to the problem of valu-ing derivatives, although the tracking portfolio approach
seems to be slightly more intuitive. Computationally, therisk-neutral approach is easier to program.
To keep this presentation relatively simple, we have re-lied on binomial models, which provide reasonable ap-proximations for the values of most derivatives. The bino-mial assumptions are usually less restrictive than theymight at first seem because the time period for the bino-mial jump can be as short as one desires. As the time periodgets shorter, the number of periods gets larger. Abinomialjump to one of two values every minute can result in 260(more than a billion) possible outcomes at the end of anhour. Defining the time period to be as short as one pleasesmeans that the binomial process can approximate to anydegree almost any probability distribution for the return onan investment over almost any horizon.
This chapter mainly focused on the general principlesof no-arbitrage valuation, although it applied these prin-ciples to value simple derivatives. Many other applica-tions exist. For example, the exercises that follow thischapter value risky bonds, callable bonds, and convert-ible bonds. The following chapter focuses in depth on oneof the most important applications of these principles, op-tion pricing.
Key Concepts
Result |
7.1: |
The no-arbitrage value of a forward |
and |
|
|
contract on a share of stock (the obligation |
|
|
|
|
the current market price of a |
|
|
to buy a share of stock at a price of K, T |
K |
|
|
|
default-free zero-coupon bond |
|
|
years in the future), assuming the stock |
T |
|
|
|
(1r) |
|
|
|
fpaying K, Tyears in the future |
|
|
pays no dividends prior to T,is |
|
|
|
|
Result 7.2:The forward price for settlement in T |
|
|
K |
|
|
|
S |
years of the purchase of a non-dividend- |
|
|
0(1 r)T |
|
|
|
f |
paying stock with a current price of Sis |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
where |
T |
|
|
|
FS(1 r) |
|
|
|
00f |
|
|
Scurrent price of the stock |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
7. Pricing Derivatives |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 7
Pricing Derivatives
253
Result 7.3:In the absence of arbitrage, the forwardResult 7.5:The value of a derivative, relative to the
currency rate F(for example, Euros/dollar)value of its underlying asset, does not
0
is related to the current exchange rate (ordepend on the mean return of the
spot rate) S, by the equationunderlying asset or investor risk
0
preferences.
F1r
0foreignResult 7.6:Valuation of a derivative based on no
S1r
0domesticarbitrage between the tracking portfolio
whereand the derivative is identical to risk-
neutral valuation of that derivative.
r the return (unannualized) on a domestic
Result 7.7:The no-arbitrage futures price is the same
or foreign risk-free security over the life
as a weighted average of the expected
of the forward agreement, as measured
futures prices at the end of the period,
in the respective country’s currency
where the weights are the risk-neutralResult 7.4:To determine the no-arbitrage value of aprobabilities, that is
derivative, find a (possibly dynamic)
F F(1 )F
portfolio of the underlying asset and a risk-ud
free security that perfectly tracks the futureResult 7.8:The no-arbitrage futures price is the risk-
payoffs of the derivative. The value of theneutral expected future spot price at the
derivative equals the value of the trackingmaturity of the futures contract.
portfolio.
Key Terms
at the money225 |
maturity date (settlement date) |
216 |
binomial process235 |
mortgage passthroughs228 |
|
clearinghouse227 |
notional amount221 |
|
collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)229 |
numerical methods248 |
|
counterparties221 |
open interest219 |
|
covered interest rate parity relation234 |
out of the money225 |
|
discount240 |
principal-only securities (POs) |
229 |
down state235 |
risk-neutral probabilities240 |
|
expiration date223 |
risk-neutral valuation method |
240 |
forward contract216 |
simulation250 |
|
forward price216 |
spot price220 |
|
forward rate discount233 |
spot rate232 |
|
futures contracts216 |
strike price223 |
|
futures markets216 |
swap221 |
|
in the money225 |
swap maturity221 |
|
interest rate swap221 |
tranches229 |
|
interest-only securities (IOs)229 |
underlying asset215 |
|
LEAPS226 |
writing an option227 |
|
margin accounts220 |
up state235 |
|
marking to market220 |
zero cost instruments223 |
|
Exercises
7.1. |
Using risk-neutral valuation, derive a formula for a |
|
|
$1.20 |
|
derivative that pays cash flows over the next two |
|
$1.10 |
|
|
periods. Assume the risk-free rate is 4 percent per |
$1 |
|
$1.05 |
|
period. |
|
$.95 |
|
|
The underlying asset, which pays no cash flows |
|
|
$.90 |
|
unless it is sold, has a market value that is modeled |
|
|
|
|
in the adjacent tree diagram. |
|
|
|
-
Grinblatt
524 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
7. Pricing Derivatives
© The McGraw
524 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
254Part IIValuing Financial Assets
|
The cash flows of the derivative that correspond to |
The exhibit below describes the value of the |
|
the above tree diagram are |
firm’s assets per bond (less the amount in the |
|
|
reserve fund maintained for the intermediate |
|
$2.20 |
|
|
|
coupon) and the cash payoffs of the bond. The |
|
$.10 |
|
|
|
nonreserved assets of the firm are currently worth |
|
$0$3.05 |
|
|
|
$100 per bond. At the Uand Dnodes, the reserve |
|
$.90 |
|
|
|
fund has been depleted and the remaining assets of |
|
$0 |
|
|
|
the firm per bond are worth $120 and $90, |
|
Find the present value of the derivative. |
respectively, while they are worth $300, $110, and |
|
|
$50, respectively, in the UU, UD,and DDstates |
7.2. |
Aconvertible bond can be converted into a |
|
|
|
two periods from now. |
|
specified number of shares of stock at the option of |
|
|
the bondholder. Assume that a convertible bond can |
|
|
|
Paths forthe Value of the Firm’s Assets PerBond |
|
be converted to 1.5 shares of stock. Asingle share |
|
|
|
(Above the Node) Cash Payoffs of a Risky Bond |
|
of this stock has a price that follows the binomial |
|
|
|
(Below theNode) in a Two-Period Binomial Tree |
|
process |
|
|
|
Diagram |
|
Date 0Date 1 |
|
|
$80 |
|
|
$50 |
|
|
|
$300 |
|
$30 |
|
|
|
UU |
|
The stock does not pay a dividend between dates 0 |
|
|
|
$105 |
|
|
$120 |
|
and 1. |
|
|
If the bondholder never converts the bond to |
U |
|
stock, the bond has a date 1 payoff of $100 x, |
$100$110 |
|
|
$5 |
|
where xis the coupon of the bond. The conversion to |
|
|
|
UD |
|
stock may take place either at date 0 or date 1 (in the |
|
|
latter case, upon revelation of the date 1 stock price). |
$90$105 |
|
The convertible bond is issued at date 0 for |
|
|
|
D |
|
$100. What should x, the equilibrium coupon of the |
|
|
|
$5$50 |
|
convertible bond per $100 at face value, be if the |
|
|
risk-free return is 15 percent per period and there |
DD |
|
are no taxes, transaction costs, or arbitrage |
|
|
|
$50 |
|
opportunities? Does the corporation save on interest |
|
|
payments if it issues a convertible bond in lieu of a |
|
|
straight bond? If so, why? |
|
7.3. |
Value a risky corporate bond, assuming that the |
|
|
risk-free interest rate is 4 percent per period, |
|
|
where a period is defined as six months. The |
7.4.In many instances, whether a cash flow occurs early |
|
corporate bond has a face value of $100 payable |
or not is a decision of the issuer or holder of the |
|
two periods from now and pays a 5 percent |
derivative. One example of this is a callable bond, |
|
coupon per period; that is, interest payments of |
which is a bond that the issuing firm can buy back at |
|
$5 at the end of both the first period and the |
a prespecified call price. Valuing a callable bond is |
|
second period. |
complicated because the early call date is not known |
|
The corporate bond is a derivative of the assets |
in advance—it depends on the future path followed |
|
of the issuing firm. Assume that the assets generate |
by the underlying security. In these cases, it is |
|
sufficient cash to pay off the promised coupon one |
necessary to compare the value of the security— |
|
period from now. In particular, the corporation has |
assuming it is held a while longer—with the value |
|
set aside a reserve fund of $5/1.04 per bond to pay |
obtained from cash by calling the bond or |
|
off the promised coupon of the bond one period |
prematurely exercising the call option. To solve these |
|
from now. Two periods from now, there are three |
problems, you must work backward in the binomial |
|
possible states. In one of those states, the assets of |
tree to make the appropriate comparisons and find the |
|
the firm are not worth much and the firm defaults, |
nodes in the tree where intermediate cash flows occur. |
|
unable to generate a sufficient amount of cash. |
Suppose that in the absence of a call, a callable |
|
Only $50 of the $105 promised payment is made on |
corporate bond with a call price of $100 plus |
|
the bond in this state. |
accrued interest has cash flows identical to those of |
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
7. Pricing Derivatives |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 7
Pricing Derivatives
255
the bond in exercise 7.3. (In this case, accruedmonths. The stock currently sells for $140 a share.
interest is the $5 coupon if it is called cum-couponAssume that it pays no dividends over the coming
at the intermediate date and 0 if it is called ex-six months. Six-month zero-coupon bonds are
coupon.) What is the optimal call policy of theselling for $98 per $100 of face value.
issuing firm, assuming that the firm is trying toa.If the forward is selling for $10.75, is there an
maximize shareholder wealth? What is the value ofarbitrage opportunity? If so, describe exactly
the callable bond? Hint:Keep in mind thathow you could take advantage of it.
maximizing shareholder wealth is the same asb.Assume that three months from now: (i) the stock
minimizing the value of the bond.price has risen to $160 and (ii) three-month zero-7.5.Consider a stock that can appreciate by 50 percentcoupon bonds are selling for $99. How much has
or depreciate by 50 percent per period. Threethe fair market value of your forward contract
periods from now, a stock with an initial value ofchanged over the three months that have elapsed?
$32 per share can be worth (1) $108—three up7.7.Assume that forward contracts to purchase one
moves; (2) $36—two up moves, one down move;share of Sony and Disney for $100 and $40,
(3) $12—one up move, two down moves; or respectively, in one year are currently selling for
(4) $4—three down moves. Three periods from now,$3.00 and $2.20. Assume that neither stock pays a
a derivative is worth $78 in case (1), $4 in case (2),dividend over the coming year and that one-year
and $0 otherwise. If the risk-free rate is 10 percentzero-coupon bonds are selling for $93 per $100 of
throughout these three periods, describe a portfolioface value. The current prices of Sony and Disney
of the stock and a risk-free bond that tracks theare $90 and $35, respectively.
payoff of the derivative and requires no future casha.Are there any arbitrage opportunities? If so,
outlays. Then, fill in the question marks in thedescribe how to take advantage of them.
accompanying exhibit, which illustrates the pathsb.What is the fair market price of a forward contract
of the stock and the derivative. Hint:You need toon a portfolio composed of one-half share of Sony
work backward. Use the risk-neutral valuationand one-half share of Disney, requiring that $70
method to check your work.be paid for the portfolio in one year?
c.Is this the same as buying one-half of a forwardThree-Period Binomial Tree Diagram Underlyingcontract on each of Sony and Disney? Why orSecurity’s Price Above Node, Derivative’s Pricewhy not? (Show payoff tables.)
Below Noded.Is it generally true that a forward on a portfolio
is the same as a portfolio of forwards? Explain.
7.8.Assume the Eurodollar rate (nine-month LIBOR) is
9 percent and the Eurosterling rate (nine-month
$108
UUULIBOR for the U.K. currency) is 11 percent. What
$78is the nine-month forward $/£ exchange rate if the
$72
current spot exchange rate is $1.58/£? (Assume that
UU
nine months from now is 274 days.)
$36
$48?
UUD7.9.Assume that futures prices for Hewlett-Packard
U
$32$24$4(HP) can appreciate by 15 percent or depreciate by
?
UD10 percent and that the risk-free rate is 10 percent
$16?$12
?over the next period. Price a derivative security on
UDD
D
HPthat has payoffs of $25 in the up state and 2$5 in
?$8$0
the down state in the next period, where the actual
DD
probability of the up state occurring is 75 percent.
?
$4
7.10.Astock price follows a binomial process for two
DDD
periods. In each period, it either increases by 20
$0
percent or decreases by 20 percent. Assuming that
the stock pays no dividends, value a derivative
which at the end of the second period pays $10 for
every up move of the stock that occurred over the
previous two periods. Assume that the risk-free rate
is 6 percent per period.
7.6.Consider a forward contract on IBM requiring7.11.Astock has a 30% per year standard deviation of its
purchase of a share of IBM stock for $150 in sixlogged returns. If you are modeling the stock price
-
Grinblatt
528 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
7. Pricing Derivatives
© The McGraw
528 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
256Part IIValuing Financial Assets
|
to value a derivative maturing in six months with |
ABC stock is currently selling at $1 per share. |
|
eight binomial periods, what should uand dbe? |
Each period the price either rises 10% or falls by |
7.12. |
Find the risk neutral probabilities and zero cost date |
5% (i.e., after one period, the stock price of ABC |
|
0 forward prices (for settlement at date 1) for the |
can either rise to $1.10 or fall to $0.95). The |
|
stock in exercise 7.2. As in that exercise, assume a |
probability of a rise is 0.5. The risk-free interest |
|
risk-free rate of 15% per period. |
rate is 5% per period. |
|
|
a.Determine the price at which you expect the |
7.13. |
AEuropean “Tootsie Square” is a financial |
|
|
|
Tootsie Square on ABC to trade. |
|
contract, which, at maturity, pays off the square |
|
|
|
b.Suppose that you wanted to form a portfolio to |
|
of the price of the underlying stock on which it is |
|
|
|
track the payoff on the Tootsie Square over the |
|
written. For instance, if the price of the |
|
|
|
first period. How many shares of ABC stock |
|
underlying stock is $3 at maturity, the Tootsie |
|
|
|
should you hold in this portfolio? |
|
Square contract pays off $9. Consider a two |
|
|
periodTootsie Square written on ABC stock. |
|
References and Additional Readings
Arrow, Kenneth J. “The Role of Securities in the Optimal
Allocation of Risk-Bearing.” Review of Economic
Studies31 (1964), pp. 91–96.
Balducci, Vince; Kumar Doraiswani; Cal Johnson; and
Janet Showers. “Currency Swaps: Corporate
Applications and Pricing Methodology,” pamphlet.
New York: Salomon Brothers, Inc., Bond Portfolio
Analysis Group, 1990.
Black, Fischer, and Myron Scholes. “The Pricing of
Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of
Political Economy81 (May–June 1973), pp.
637–59.
Breeden, Douglas T., and Robert H. Litzenberger. “Prices
of State-Contingent Claims Implicit in Option
Prices.” Journal of Business51 (1978), pp. 621–52.Cox, J., and S. Ross. “The Valuation of Options for
Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of
Financial Economics3 (Jan.–Mar. 1976),
pp.145–66.
Cox, John C.; Stephen A. Ross; and Mark Rubinstein.
“Option Pricing: ASimplified Approach.” Journal of
Financial Economics7 (Sept. 1979), pp. 229–63.
Cox, John C., and Mark Rubinstein. Options Markets.
Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
Grinblatt, Mark. “An Analytic Solution for Interest Rate
Swap Spreads.” Working Paper, University of
California, Los Angeles, 1995.
Grinblatt, Mark, and Narasimhan Jegadeesh. “The
Relative Pricing of Eurodollar Futures and
Forwards.” Journal of Finance51, no. 4 (Sept.
1996), pp. 1499–1522.
Grinblatt, Mark, and Francis Longstaff. “Financial
Innovation and the Role of Derivative Securities: An
Empirical Analysis of the Treasury Strips Program.”
Journal of Finance.
Harrison, Michael J., and David M. Kreps. “Martingales
and Arbitrage in Multiperiod Securities Markets.”
Journal of Economic Theory20 (1979),
pp.381–408.
Hull, John C. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives,3d
ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1997.
Ingersoll, Jonathan. Theory of Financial Decision
Making.Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987.
Jarrow, Robert, and Stuart Turnbull. Derivative Securities.
Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing, 1996.
Lewis, Michael. Liar’s Poker: Rising through the
Wreckage on Wall Street. New York: W. W. Norton,
1989.
Merton, Robert C. “Theory of Rational Option Pricing.”
Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science
4 (Spring 1973), pp. 141–83.
———. Continuous Time Finance.Oxford, England:
Basil Blackwell, 1990.
Rendelman, Richard J., Jr., and Brit J. Bartter. “Two-State
Option Pricing.” Journal of Finance34 (Dec. 1979),
pp. 1093–1110.
Ross, Stephen A. “ASimple Approach to the Valuation of
Risky Streams.” Journal of Business51 (July 1978)
pp. 453–75.
Rubinstein, Mark. “Presidential Address: Implied
Binomial Trees.” Journal of Finance49 (July 1994),
pp. 771–818.
Schwartz, Eduardo. “The Valuation of Warrants:
Implementing a New Approach.” Journal of
Financial Economics4 (Jan. 1977), pp. 79–93.Shleifer, Andrei and Robert Vishny. “The Limits of
Arbitrage.” Journal of Finance 52 (1997),
pp.35–55.
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
8. Options |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
CHAPTER
8
Options
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
1.Explain the basic put-call parity formula, how it relates to the value of a forward
contract, and the types of options to which put-call parity applies.
2.Relate put-call parity to a boundary condition for the minimum call price and
know the implications of this boundary condition for pricing American call
options and determining when they should be exercised.
3.Gather the information needed to price a European option with (a) the binomial
model and (b) the Black-Scholes Model, and then implement these models to
price an option.
4.Understand the Black Scholes formula in the following form:
SN(d) PV(K)N(d T).
011
-
and interpret N(d).
5.
1
Provide examples that illustrate why an American call on a dividend-paying stock oran American put (irrespective of dividend policy) might be exercised prematurely.
6.
Understand the effect of volatility on option prices and premature exercise.
In 1980, Chrysler, then on the verge of bankruptcy, received loan guarantees from the
U.S. government. As partial payment for the guarantees, Chrysler gave the U.S.
government options to buy Chrysler stock for $13 a share until 1990. At the time these
options (technically known as “warrants”) were issued, Chrysler stock was trading at
about $7.50 per share. By mid-1983, however, Chrysler stock had risen to well over
$30 a share and in July of that year, Chrysler repaid the guaranteed loans in full.
Lee Iacocca, Chrysler’s CEO at the time, argued that the government had not
shelled out a dime to provide the loan guarantees and asked that the warrants be
returned to Chrysler at little or no cost. However, many congressmen felt that the
government had taken a risk by providing the guarantees and if the warrants were to
be returned to Chrysler, they should be returned at their full market value. Ultimately,
the government decided to hold an auction for the warrants. Determined to recover
its warrants, Chrysler participated in the auction, which occurred when Chrysler
257
-
Grinblatt
532 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
8. Options
© The McGraw
532 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
258Part IIValuing Financial Assets
stock was trading at about $28 a share. Chrysler’s bid, about $22 per warrant, was
the winning bid in the auction.
One of the most important applications of the theory of derivatives valuation is the
pricing of options. Options, introduced earlier in the text, are ubiquitous in finan-
cial markets and, as seen in this chapter and in much of the remainder of this text, are
often found implicitly in numerous corporate financial decisions and corporate securities.
Options have long been important to portfolio managers. In recent years, they have
become increasingly important to corporate treasurers. There are several reasons for
this. For one, a corporate treasurer needs to be educated about options for proper
oversight of the pension funds of the corporation. In addition, the treasurer needs to
understand that options can be useful in corporate hedging1and are implicit in many
securities the corporation issues, such as convertible bonds, mortgages, and callable
bonds.2
Options also are an important form of executive compensation and, in some
cases, a form of financing for the firm.
An understanding of option valuation also is critical for any sophisticated financial
decision maker. Consider the opening vignette, for example. As compensation for a
government loan guarantee—which by itself is an option—Chrysler issued stock
options that gave the government the right to buy Chrysler stock at $13 a share. Both
Chrysler and the government felt that this agreement (along with some additional
compensation that Chrysler provided) was a fair deal at the time. However, as Chrysler
recovered in 1983, the value of the loan guarantee declined to zero and the value of
the stock options rose. With no active market in which to observe traded prices for the
Chrysler options, it was difficult to know exactly how much the options were worth.
This chapter applies the no-arbitrage tracking portfolio approach to derive the “fair
market” values of options, like those issued by Chrysler, using both the binomial
approach and a continuous-time approach known as the Black-Scholes Model. It then
discusses several practical considerations and limitations of the binomial and Black-
Scholes option valuation models. Among these is the problem of estimating volatility.
The chapter generalizes the Black-Scholes Model to a variety of underlying securities,
including bonds and commodities. It concludes with a discussion of the empirical
evidence on the Black-Scholes Model.
