
- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
Investment banks, commercial banks, and a number of institutional investors have made
sizable investments in the technology of pricing derivatives. Cheap computing power,
in the form of workstations and parallel processing mainframes, and expensive brain
power are the main elements of this technology.
Numerical Methods
The techniques for valuing virtually all the new financial instruments developed by
Wall Street firms consist primarily of numerical methods; that is, no algebraic
formula is used to compute the value of the derivative as a function of the value of the
underlying security. Instead, a computer is fed a number corresponding to the price of
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
7. Pricing Derivatives |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 7
Pricing Derivatives
249
the underlying security along with some important parameter values. The computer then
executes a program that derives the numerical value of the derivative and, sometimes,
additional information such as the number of shares of the underlying security in the
tracking portfolio.
Binomial-Like Numerical Methods.These numerical methods fall into several
classes. One class is the binomial approach used throughout this chapter. On Wall
Street, some investment banks employ the binomial approach to value callable cor-
porate bonds (see exercise 7.5) for their clients. This binomial approach also is com-
monly used in spreadsheets by recent M.B.A. graduates working in corporate
finance, sales, and trading, who need to find “quick and dirty” valuation results for
many derivatives.
One potential hitch in the binomial method is that it is necessary to specify the val-
ues of the underlying security along all nodes in the tree diagram. This requires esti-
mation of uand d, the amounts by which the security can move up and down from
each node. There are several ways to simplify the process. First, the binomial method
can be used to approximate many kinds of continuous distributions if the time periods
are cut into extremely small intervals. One popular continuous distribution is the log-
normal distribution. The natural logarithm of the return of a security is normally dis-
tributed when the price movements of the security are determined by the lognormal
distribution. Once the annualized standard deviation,
, of this normal distribution is
known, uand d are estimated as follows.
ueTN
1
d
u
where
Tnumber of years to expiration
Nnumber of binomial periods
eexponential constant (about 2.7183)
Thus
T
square root of the number of years per binomial period
N
Depending on the problem, the available computing power, and the time pressures
involved, the valuation expert can model the binomial steps, T/N,as anywhere from
one day to six months.27
Numerical analysis of derivatives with binomial approaches is often modified
slightly to account for inefficient computing with the binomial approach. For one, the
value of the derivative is affected more by what happens to the underlying asset in the
near term and in the middle of the binomial tree, because that is where the risk-neutral
probabilities are greatest and risk-free discounting has the least impact on the current
value of the derivative. Hence, derivative valuation experts typically modify the bino-
mial method to compute near-term future values and future values in the middle of the
27Chapter
8 describes how to estimate from historical data.
-
Grinblatt
516 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
7. Pricing Derivatives
© The McGraw
516 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
250Part IIValuing Financial Assets
binomial tree more intensively and thus more precisely. Often, the tree is modified to
a rectangular grid shape.28
Simulation.An additional method that Wall Street firms use to value derivatives
is simulation, a method that uses random numbers obtained from a computer to gen-
erate outcomes and then averages the outcomes of some variable to obtain values.
Simulations are generally used when the derivative value at each node along the tree
diagram depends only on the simulation path taken, rather than on a comparison
with action-contingent values of the derivative along other paths followed by the
underlying asset. Derivatives that can be valued with simulation property include
forwards and European options, but they exclude, for example, mortgages and Amer-
ican put options.
Asimulation starts with the initial price of the underlying security. Then, a random
number generated by a computer determines the value for the underlying security at
the next period. This process continues to the end of the life of the derivative. At that
point, a single path for the underlying security over a number of periods has been con-
structed and an associated path for the derivative (whose value derivesfrom the under-
lying security) has been computed. Usually, one generates derivative values along the
single path by discounting back, one period at a time, the terminal value of the deriv-
ative. The discounting is made at the short-term risk-free rate, which may itself have
its own simulated path!
Asecond path for the underlying security is then generated, the derivative value is
calculated for that path, and an initial derivative value for the second path is computed.
This process continues until anywhere from 100 to 100,000 simulated paths have been
analyzed. The initial value of the derivative over each path is then averaged to obtain
the fair market value of the derivative.
The Risk-Free Rate Used by Wall-Street Firms
All derivative valuation procedures make use of a short-term risk-free return. The most
commonly used input is LIBOR. While most academic research focuses on the short-
term U.S. Treasury bill rate as “the risk-free rate,” this research fails to recognize that
only the Treasury can borrow at this rate while arbitrage opportunities between a track-
ing portfolio and a mispriced derivative may require uncollateralized risk-free borrow-
ing by a high-quality borrower. The rate at which such borrowing takes place is much
closer to LIBOR than to the T-bill rate.29
28Other
approaches are also available for valuing derivatives. One method, developed by Schwartz
(1977), models the process for the underlying security as a continuous process and uses stochastic
calculus and no-arbitrage conditions to derive a differential equation for the derivative. It is possible to
solve the differential equation with numerical methods that have been devised in mathematics, including
the implicit finite difference method. Explicit methods of solving the differential equation are tied
directly to the risk-neutral valuation method.
29A
further discussion of this subject is found in Grinblatt (1995). This chapter’s results on currency
forward rates require longer-term risk-free rates. Implied zero-coupon interest rates in the LIBOR market
(known as Eurocurrency rates) appear to be the correct interest rates to use for this relation. For
horizons in excess of one year, the fixed rate on one side of an interest rate swap that is exchanged for
LIBOR provides the correct risk-free rate for the equation in Result 7.3.
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
7. Pricing Derivatives |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 7
Pricing Derivatives
251