- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
Covariances of stock returns are critical inputs for computing the variance of a portfo-
lio of stocks.
Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
Consider an investor who holds an airline stock and is considering adding a second
stock to his or her portfolio. You would expect the new portfolio to have more vari-
ability if the second stock were another airline stock as opposed to, say, a pharmaceu-
tical stock. After all, the prices of two airline stocks are more likely to move together
than the prices of an airline stock and a pharmaceutical stock. In other words, if the
returns of two stocks covary positively, a portfolio that has positive weights on both
stocks will have a higher return variance than if they covary negatively.
Computing Portfolio Variances with Given Inputs.To verify this relation between
portfolio variance and the covariance between a pair of stocks, expand the formula for
the variance of a portfolio
var(xr˜xr˜) E{[xr˜xr˜E(xrxr)]2}
112211221122
It is possible to rewrite this equation as
var(x˜xr˜) E{[xr˜xr˜(xrxr)]2}
r
112211221122
E{[x(˜r)x(˜2
rrr)]}
111222
Squaring the bracketed term and expanding yields
(xr˜xr˜2˜r)22˜r)2r˜r)(˜r)]
var) E[x(rx(r2xx(r
1122111222121122
2˜r)22˜r)2]2xxE[(˜r)(˜r)]
xE[(r]xE[(rrr
111222121122
2˜2˜)2xxcov(r˜, r˜)
xvar(r)xvar(r
11221212
2222
xx2xx(4.9a)
11221212
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
4. Portfolio Tools |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 4
Portfolio Tools
111
Equation (4.9a) indicates that the variance of a portfolio of two investments is the sum
of the products of the squared portfolio weights and the variances of the investment
returns, plus a third term, which is twice the product of the two portfolio weights and
the covariance between the investment returns. Thus, consistent with the intuition pro-
vided above, when the portfolio has positive weight on both stocks, the larger the
covariance, the larger is the portfolio variance.
Example 4.12 illustrates how to apply equation (4.9a).
Example 4.12:Computing the Standard Deviation of Portfolios of Two Stocks
Stock A has a standard deviation () of 30 percent per year.Stock B has a standard devi-
A
ation () of 10 percent per year.The annualized covariance between the returns of the two
B
stocks () is .0002.Compute the standard deviation of portfolios with the following sets of
AB
portfolio weights:
-
1.
x .75
x .25
3.x 1.5x.5
A
B
AB
2.
x .25
x .75
4.x xx 1 x
A
B
AB
Answer:The stocks’variances are the squares of their standard deviations.The variance
of stock A’s return is therefore .09, stock B’s is .01.Applying equation (4.9a) gives the vari-
ances for the four cases.
-
1.
22(.01)
.75(.09) .252(.75)(.25)(.0002) .051325
22(.01)
2.
.25(.09) .752(.75)(.25)(.0002) .011325
22(.01)
3.
1.5(.09) (.5)2(1.5)(.5)(.0002) .2047
4.
.09x2.01(1 x)2
2(.0002)x(1 x)
Because these are variances, the standard deviations are the square roots of these results.
They are approximately
-
1.
22.65%
3.45.24%
2.
10.64%
4..09x22
.01(1x)2(.0002)x(1x)
Using Historical Data to Derive the Inputs: The Backward-Looking Approach.
Example 4.12 calculates the standard deviations of portfolios of two stocks, assuming
that the variances (or standard deviations) and covariances of the stocks are given to
us. As noted earlier, these variances and covariances must be estimated. Acommon
approach is to look backward, using variances and covariances computed from histor-
ical returns as estimates of future variances and covariances. Example 4.13 shows how
to use this approach to predict the variance following a major merger.
Example 4.13:Predicting the Return Variance of ChevronTexaco Following the
Mergerof Chevron and Texaco
In October 2000, Chevron and Texaco announced plans to merge, with Chevron, at about
twice the market capitalization of Texaco, being the acquiring firm.Exhibit 4.2 presents the
12 monthly returns of Texaco and Chevron in the year prior to the announcement.Predict
the variance of the merged entity, ChevronTexaco, using this data.Assume that Chevron is
2/3 of the merged entity for your answer.
Answer:The variances of Chevron and Texaco’s monthly returns are 0.00850 and
0.00768, respectively, and the covariance between them is 0.00689.Thus, the monthly return
variance of the combined entity is
22
var(ChevronTexaco) (2/3)(0.00850) (1/3)(0.00768) 2(2/3)(1/3)(0.00689) 0.00770
The relatively high covariance between Chevron and Texaco’s returns generates a variance
of the combined entity that is not substantially less than that of the two separate entities.
-
Grinblatt
242 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
4. Portfolio Tools
© The McGraw
242 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
112 |
Part IIValuing Financial Assets |
-
EXHIBIT4.2
Monthly Returns forChevron and Texaco from October1999through September2000
-
Chevron
Texaco
-
Oct-99
2.89%
2.77%
Nov-99
2.33%
0.09%
Dec-99
2.19%
10.76%
Jan-00
3.46%
2.65%
Feb-00
9.93%
9.50%
Mar-00
23.77%
13.31%
Apr-00
7.91%
8.60%
May-00
9.36%
17.98%
Jun-00
8.25%
7.29%
Jul-00
6.87%
7.19%
Aug-00
7.84%
5.19%
Sep-00
0.87%
1.91%
Correlations, Diversification, and Portfolio Variances
Substituting equation (4.8)—the formula for computing covariances from correlations
and standard deviations—into equation (4.9a), the portfolio variance formula, generates
a formula for the variance of a portfolio given the correlation instead of the covariance.
-
var(x˜xr˜2222
r) xx2xx
(4.9b)
11221122121212
Equation (4.9b) illustrates the principle of diversification. For example, if both
stock variances are .04, a portfolio that is half invested in each stock has a variance of
.02.02 .25(.04).25(.04)2(.5)(.5) (.2)(.2)
12
This variance is lower than the .04 variance of each of the two stocks as long as is
less than 1. Since is generally less than 1, more stocks almost always imply lower
variance.
Equation (4.9b) also yields the following result:
-
Result 4.2
Given positive portfolio weights on two stocks, the lower the correlation, the lower the vari-ance of the portfolio.
Portfolio Variances When One of the Two Investments in the Portfolio Is Riskless.
Aspecial case of equation (4.9b) occurs when one of the investments in the portfolio
is riskless. For example, if investment 1 is riskless, and are both zero. In this
112
case, the portfolio variance is
22
x
22
The standard deviation is either
x, if xis positive
222
or
x, if xis negative
222
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
4. Portfolio Tools |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 4
Portfolio Tools
113
Hence, when is zero, the formula for the standard deviation of a portfolio of two
1
investments is the absolute value of the portfolio-weighted average of the two standard
deviations, 0 and . Note also that since x (1 x), a positive weight on a risk-
221
free asset and risky asset return, which necessarily implies that both weights are less
than 1,reduces variance relative to a 100 percent investment in the risky asset. More-
over, a negative weight on a risk-free asset (implying x
1) results in a larger vari-
2
ance than a 100 percent investment in the risky asset. Hence, leverage increases risk
(see part bof exercise 4.18).
Portfolio Variances When the Two Investments in the Portfolio Have Perfectly
Correlated Returns.Equation (4.9b) also implies that when two securities are per-
fectly positively or negatively correlated, it is possible to create a riskless portfolio
from them, that is, one with a variance and standard deviation of zero, as Example 4.14
illustrates.8
Example 4.14:Forming a Riskless Portfolio from Two Perfectly Correlated
Securities
The Acquiring Corporation has just announced plans to purchase the Target Corporation,
which started trading for $50 per share just after the announcement.In one month, share-
holders of the Target Corporation will exchange each share of Target Corporation stock they
own for 2 shares of Acquiring Corporation stock, which currently sells for $20 per share, plus
$10 in cash.As a consequence of this announcement, shares of the Target Corporation
began to move in lockstep with shares of the Acquiring Corporation.Although returns on the
two stocks became perfectly positively correlated once the announcement occurred, the cash
portion of the exchange offer made the shares of the Target Corporation less volatile than
shares of the Acquiring Corporation.Specifically, immediately after the announcement, the
standard deviation of the returns of the Acquiring Corporation’s shares is 50% per annum
while those of the Target Corporation have a standard deviation of 40% per annum.What
portfolio weights on the Target and Acquiring Corporations generate a riskless investment
during the month prior to the actual merger?
Answer:Using equation (4.9b), the portfolio weights xand 1 xon the Acquiring and
Target Corporation’s shares, respectively, make the variance of the portfolio’s return
2x2 222
.5 .4(1 x) 2x(1 x)(.5)(.4) (.5x .4(1 x))
which equals zero when x 4.Thus, the weight on Acquiring is 4, the weight on Target
is 5.
For the portfolio in Example 4.14, the standard deviation, the square root of the
variance, is the absolute value of .5x.4(1 x). This is the portfolio-weighted aver-
age of the standard deviations. In sum, we have:
-
Result 4.3
The standard deviation of either (1) a portfolio of two investments where one of the invest-ments is riskless or (2) a portfolio of two investments that are perfectly positively corre-lated is the absolute value of the portfolio-weighted average of the standard deviations ofthe two investments.
8Perfect correlations often arise with derivative securities. Aderivativeis a security whose value
depends on the value of another security. For example, the value of a call option written on a stock—the
right to buy the stock for a given amount—described in Chapter 3, or a put option—the right to sell the
stock for a given amount—described in Chapter 2, depend entirely on the value of the stock. Derivative
securities are discussed further in Chapters 7 and 8.
-
Grinblatt
246 Titman: FinancialII. Valuing Financial Assets
4. Portfolio Tools
© The McGraw
246 HillMarkets and Corporate
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
114Part IIValuing Financial Assets
For special cases (1) and (2), Result 4.3 suggests that when the weight on the riskier
of the two assets is positive, the equations for the standard deviation and of the mean
of the portfolio are, respectively, the portfolio-weighted averages of the individual asset
return standard deviations and the individual asset return means.
Portfolios of Many Stocks
To compute the variance of a portfolio of stocks, one needs to know the following:
-
•
The variances of the returns of each stock in the portfolio.
•
The covariances between the returns of each pair of stocks in the portfolio.
•
The portfolio weights.
APortfolio Variance Formula Based on Covariances.Given the information
described above, it is possible to compute the variance of the return of a portfolio of
an arbitrary number of stocks with the formula given in the result below:
Result 4.4The formula for the variance of a portfolio return is given by:
-
NN
2xx
(4.9c)
pijij
i 1j 1
where covariance between the returns of stocks i and j.
ij
Example 4.15 illustrates how to apply equation (4.9c).
Example 4.15:Computing the Variance of a Portfolio of Three Stocks
Consider three stocks, AT&T, SBC, and Verizon, denoted respectively as stocks 1, 2, 3.
Assume that the covariance between the returns of AT&Tand SBC (stocks 1 and 2) is .002;
between SBC and Verizon (2 and 3), .005;and between AT&T and Verizon (1 and 3), .001.
The variances of the three stocks are respectively .04, .06, and .09, and the weights on
AT&T, SBC, and Verizon are respectively x 1/3;x 1/6;and x 1/2.Calculate the vari-
123
ance of the portfolio.
Answer:From equation (4.9c), the variance of the portfolio is:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
x
111112121313212122222323313132323333
.04.002.001.002.06.005.001.005.09
.03
91861836126124
In equation (4.9c), note that is the variance of the ith stock return when j i
ij
and that N2terms are summed. Therefore, the expression for the variance of a portfo-
lio contains Nvariance terms—one for each stock—but N2Ncovariance terms. For
a portfolio of 100 stocks, the expression would thus have 100 variance terms and 9,900
covariance terms. Clearly, the covariance terms are more important determinants of the
portfolio variance for large portfolios than the individual variances.
Note also that a number of the terms in the expression for a portfolio’s variance
repeat; for example, see equation (4.9c) and the answer to Example 4.15. Therefore,
you sometimes will see equation (4.9c) written as
N
222xx
x2
pjjijij
j 1i<j
Grinblatt |
II. Valuing Financial Assets |
4. Portfolio Tools |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 4
Portfolio Tools
115
For two stocks, this reads as
22222
xx2xx
p11221212
APortfolio Variance Formula Based on Correlations.Covariances also can be
computed from the corresponding correlations and either the variances or standard devi-
ations of the stock returns. Substituting equation (4.8), , into equation (4.9c)
ijijij
yields an equation for the variance of a portfolio of many stocks in terms of correla-
tions and standard deviations
NN
2xx
pijijij
i 1j 1
Covariances between Portfolio Returns and Stock Returns
Some of the portfolios that we will be interested in (for example, the minimum vari-
ance portfolio) can be found by solving for the weights that generate portfolios that
have prespecified covariances with individual stocks. Here, the following result is often
used:
-
Result 4.5
For any stock, indexed by k,the covariance of the return of a portfolio with the return ofstockk is the portfolio-weighted average of the covariances of the returns of the invest-ments in the portfolio with stock k’s return, that is
N
x
pkiik
i 1
