
- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
23.2Duration
Duration is a concept that is closely related to DV01.The durationof a bond (or a
bond portfolio or cash flow stream), denoted DUR,is a weighted average of the wait-
ing times (measured in years) for receiving its promised future cash flows. The weight
on each time is proportional to the discounted value of the cash flow to be paid at
that time; that is, letting rdenote the yield (or discount rate) for the bond, Pdenote
the bond’s market price, and Cdenote the cash flow at date t,the duration DURof
t
the bond is
-
CCC
112 2. . .TT
(1r)r)2T
(1(1r)
DUR
(23.3)
CCC
12T
. . .
(1r)(1r)2T
(1r)
T
PV(C)
tt
P
t 1
Note that the weights, PV(C) P,always sum to 1.
t
We now explore some of the properties of duration.
The Duration of Zero-Coupon Bonds
The duration of a zero-coupon bond is the number of years to the maturity date of
the bond. Since a zero-coupon bond has only one cash flow, paid at maturity, the
weight on its maturity date is one. Hence, a 10-year zero-coupon bond has a dura-
tion of 10 years and a 6-year zero-coupon bond has a duration of 6 years. Aportfo-
lio of a group of 10-year zero-coupon bonds also would have a duration of 10 years.
All cash flows occur at year 10; hence, the 10-year timing of these cash flows
receives a weight of one.
The Duration of Coupon Bonds
It is useful to view a bond with coupons as a portfolio of zero-coupon bonds. For exam-
ple, a 10-year bond with a 5 percent coupon paid annually and a $100 face value can
be thought of as a 10-year zero-coupon bond with a $105 face value—the principal
plus the final coupon—plus nine other zero-coupon bonds, one for each of the first
9years, each with a face value of $5. Aflat term structure of interest rates implies that
the discount rate for each of the 10 cash flows is the same, and that duration is sim-
ply the (present value) weighted average of the durations of the cash flows that make
up the bond, as Example 23.6 shows.
Example 23.6:Computing the Duration of a Straight Coupon Bond
Compute the duration of a semiannual straight-coupon bond with a 2-year maturity.The bond
trades at par and has an 8 percent annualized coupon.Assume the term structure of inter-
est rates is flat.
Answer:Since the bond trades at par and the term structure of interest rates is flat, the
semiannually compounded discount rate is 8 percent.(See Result 2.2 in Chapter 2.)
-
•
The first coupon of $4.00 paid 6 months from now has a present value of $3.846 at8 percent and thus a weight equal to $3.846
bond price .03846.
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
827
-
•
The second coupon, 1 year from now, has a present value of $3.698 and a
corresponding weight of .03698.
-
•
The third coupon, 1.5 years from now, has a present value of $3.556 and a
corresponding weight of .03556.
-
•
The final cash flow, $104, has a present value of $88.900 and a weight of .889.
Hence, duration, the weighted average of the times the cash flows are paid, is computed as
.03846(.5 years) .03698(1 year) .03556(1.5 years) .88900(2 years) 1.89 years
Durations of Discount and Premium-Coupon Bonds
Exhibit 23.2 illustrates the duration of a coupon bond, a weighted average of the times at
which cash flows are paid, as the fulcrum (the black triangle) on the time scale where the
discounted valuesof the cash flows (principal plus coupon) balance.As Exhibit 23.3 in
comparison with Exhibit 23.2 indicates, the fulcrum in Exhibit 23.2 needs to be shifted to
the left to maintain a balance if the coupons increase because such an increase would also
increase their discounted values proportionately. Hence, other things being equal, premium
bonds have lower durations, and discount bonds, being more like zero-coupon bonds, have
higher durations.
How Duration Changes as Time Elapses
Exhibit 23.4 shows the duration of a straight coupon bond with semiannual payments as
time elapses, holding the yield to maturity constant. Note that as time elapses, the bond’s
duration increases at coupon dates. As the coupon is paid, the weights on all the other cash
flows are readjusted immediately. Between coupon dates, duration constantly decreases.
Durations of Bond Portfolios
The durations of bond portfolios are computed in the same manner as the durations
ofcoupon bonds. If we were to hold both 6-year zero-coupon bonds and 8-year
EXHIBIT23.2Duration as a Fulcrum
Cash flow present value
principal
coupon
-
1
2
3 4
Year
-
Grinblatt
1666 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1666 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
828 |
Part VIRisk Management EXHIBIT23.3Duration as a Fulcrum (with LargerCoupons) |
Cash flow present value
principal
coupon
-
1
2
4
Year
EXHIBIT23.4Duration as Time Elapses
Duration
3
2
1
-
Years
.5
1 1.5
2 2.5 3
3.5 4
zero-coupon bonds, the duration of the bond portfolio would lie somewhere between
six and eight years. Suppose that the discounted value of the 6-year and 8-year
zero-coupon bonds is $10 million each. Then, since year 6 would have the same weight
as year 8 and the weights add to 1, each weight would be .5 and the duration of the
$20 million portfolio of the two bonds would be 7 years [ .5(6 years) .5(8 years)].
This result can be generalized to any portfolio of bonds as indicated below.
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
829
-
Result 23.3
Assuming that the term structure of interest rates is flat, the duration of a portfolio of bondsis the portfolio-weighted average of the durations of the respective bonds in the portfolio.
How Duration Changes as Interest Rates Increase
Result 23.3 implies that an increase in the yield to maturity of the bond decreases dura-
tion (compare Exhibit 23.5 to Exhibit 23.4). If we think of a coupon-paying bond as a
portfolio of zero-coupon bonds, then an increase in the bond’s yield to maturity reduces
the weight of the later cash flow payments proportionately more than it reduces the
weight of the early cash flows.
Result 23.3 also provides insights into how to alter the duration of a corporation’s
debt. Example 23.7 demonstrates how this is achieved in a hypothetical situation
involving Disney.
Example 23.7:Changing the Duration of Corporate Liabilities
Assume that Disney’s debt obligations have a market value of $2 billion and a duration of
five years.Half of this is a 10-year note with a duration of six years.The Disney treasurer
has decided that the company should target a debt duration of four years instead of five.
Assume that it is possible to issue 4-year par straight-coupon notes, which have a duration
of three years.If the proceeds from issuing these notes are used to retire 10-year notes,
there will be a reduction in the duration of Disney’s liabilities.Assuming a flat yield curve,
how many dollars of 4-year notes should Disney issue?
Answer:Disney’s existing liabilities consist of $1 billion in 10-year notes with a duration
of six years and, by Result 23.3, $1 billion in other liabilities with a duration of four years.
IfDisney issues $xin notes with three years’duration, and uses the proceeds to retire the
10-year notes, the duration of its new liability structure will be
$x$1 billion$x$1 billion
DUR 3 years 6 years 4 years
$2 billion$2 billion$2 billion
2
DUR 4 years when x $3billion.Thus, issuing $666,666,667 in 3-year notes and using
the proceeds to retire two-thirds of the 10-year notes puts Disney at its target liability duration.
EXHIBIT23.5Duration as a Fulcrum (with a HigherDiscount Rate)
Cash flow present value
principal
coupon
-
1
2
3 4
Year
-
Grinblatt
1670 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1670 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
830 |
Part VIRisk Management |
23.3 |
Linking Duration to DV01 |
This section develops formulas that link duration to DV01.First, it shows that the dura-
tion of a bond is related to the interest rate risk of the bond.
Duration as a Derivative
Duration is a useful tool for managing the interest rate risk of bond portfolios. This sug-
gests that duration is related to the derivative of a bond’s price with respect to interest
rates. Such a derivative also will enable us to relate duration to DV01.To illustrate the
relationship between duration and DV01,consider a 2-year zero-coupon bond with a face
value of $100 and a continuously compounded yield to maturity of r.The bond’s price
is P $100e2rand its duration is two years. Using calculus, the percentage change in
the bond’s price dP Pfor a change in the continuously compounded yield-to-maturity is
-
dP PdP11
$100(2e2r) 2
(23.4)
dre2r
drP$100
Thus, 2, the negative of the bond’s duration, is the percentage sensitivity of the
bond’s price to changes in the bond’s continuously compounded yield.
This derivative property can be generalized. When the term structure of interest
rates is flat, duration always can be viewed as minus the percentage change in the value
of the bond (or portfolio) with respect to changes in its continuously compounded yield
to maturity. For example a bond maturing in Tyears, with cash flows of Cat date t,
t
t 1,..., T,has a price of
-
T
P Cert
(23.5)
t
t 1
if ris the bond’s continuously compounded yield to maturity.
The percentage change in Pwith respect to the continuously compounded yield is
-
T
dP P1
tCert DUR
(23.6)
drPt
t 1
This is the negative of duration because the weight assigned to each relevant date (the
ts) is the negative of the discounted value of the cash flow at that time divided by the
discounted value of the entire bond P.
To alter equation (23.6) for different compounding frequencies, note the following
formulas:
-
•
If annually compounded yields had been used in place of continuously
compounded yields for this analysis, the derivative corresponding to equation
(23.6) would be
T
dP P11CDUR
t
t
dr1rP(1r)t1
r
t 1
indicating that duration is the negative of (1 r) times the percentage price
change for a small change in the yield.
•For semiannually compounded yields, the derivative corresponding to equation
(23.6) would be
2T
dP P11tCDUR
t
drr 2r 2)t
1P2(11r2
t 1
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
831
indicating that duration is the negative of (1 r 2) times the percentage price
change for a small change in the yield.
•For monthly compounded yields, the derivative corresponding to equation
(23.6) would be
12T
dP P11tCDUR
t
drr 12r 12)t
1P12(11r12
t 1
indicating that duration is the negative of (1 r 12) times the percentage
price change for a small change in the yield.
•As the compounding frequency mbecomes infinite, the denominator under
DUR, (1r m), converges to 1, which leads to the formula in equation
(23.6).
Formulas Relating Duration to DV01
The relation between duration and DV01is straightforward if the 01in DV01is defined
as a continuously compounded rate. In this case, DV01is the product of .0001 and
the derivative of the value of the bond with respect to a shift in the bond’s continu-
ously compounded yield; that is
dP
DV01 .0001
dr
Equation (23.6) implies that duration is the derivative of the percentage change in the value
of the bond with respect to the (continuously compounded) yield to maturity; that is
1dP
DUR
Pdr
Solving either of the last two equations for dP drand substituting its equivalent value
into the other equation gives an equation that relates DV01to duration
-
DV01 DURP.0001
(23.7a)
Equation (23.7a) suggests the following result:
-
Result 23.4
Because DV01can be translated into duration and vice versa, DV01and duration are equiv-alent as tools both for measuring interest rate risk and for hedging.
Modified Duration.If DV01is based on rates that are compounded mtimes a year
instead of continuously, then the formula relating DV01to duration is modified as follows
-
DUR
DV01 rP.0001
(23.7b)
1
m
The term in brackets is known as modified duration.
Effective Duration forAssets and Liabilities with Risky Cash Flow Streams.
Duration is more complicated to implement in a corporate setting without first linking
duration to DV01.Because most corporate cash flows are risky, weighting the maturi-
ties of uncertain cash flows to come up with a measure of the future timing of cash
flows makes little sense. However, duration, like DV01,is a measure of the interest
rate sensitivity of a cash flow, which can alternatively be obtained from a factor model.
-
Grinblatt
1674 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1674 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
832Part VIRisk Management
Thus, one can compute an effective durationof a corporate asset or liability with risk
(generated both by the uncertain cash flow stream and by changes in the discount rate(s)
for the cash flows in the stream) by first estimating its DV01as an interest rate sensi-
tivity in a factor model and then inverting equation (23.7b) to obtain DUR.This effec-
tive duration tells us that the corporate asset or liability is of the same sensitivity to
interest rate risk per dollar invested as a riskless zero-coupon bond of maturity DUR.
Hedging with DV01s or Durations
The last section provided formulas that link DV01directly to duration. Hence, both
duration and DV01are equally good tools for hedging bond portfolios. Recall that a
perfect hedge makes the new portfolio, including the hedge investment, have a DV01
of zero. To obtain a DV01of zero, the ratio of the duration of the unhedged bond port-
folio (DUR) to the duration of its hedge portfolio (DUR) must be inversely propor-
BH
tional to the ratio of the respective market values of the bonds;10that is
DURP
HB
DURP
BH
If this property holds, the combination of the unhedged bond position and the short
position in the hedge has a duration (and DV01) of zero.
When duration is based on noncontinuously compounded yields, this relation is still
valid because the durations are both multiplied by the same constant. Of course, our
caveat that perfect hedging with DV01s occurs only when the term structure of inter-
est rates is flat applies here as well.
Example 23.8:Using Duration to Form a Riskless Hedge Position
Giuliana holds $1,000,000 (face value) of 10-year zero-coupon bonds with a yield to matu-
rity of 8 percent compounded semiannually.How can she perfectly hedge this position with
a short position in 5-year zero-coupon bonds with a yield to maturity of 8 percent (com-
pounded semiannually)?
Answer:The ratio of the durations of the two bonds is 10/5 2.The ratio of their mar-
ket values should therefore be 1/2.The market value of the 10-year bonds is
$1,000,000
$456,386.95
1.0420
The market value of the 5-year bonds is
x
1.0410
For the market value of the 10-year bond position to be half the value of the 5-year posi-
tion, xmust solve
1x
$456,386.95
21.0410
-
or
x $1,351,128.34
10From
equation (23.7a), DV01is zero when
(DURP.0001) (DURP.0001) 0
BBHH
This equation, when rearranged, proves the result.
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
833
Hence selling short $1,351,128.34 (face value) of the 5-year bonds hedges the 10-year bond
position.
It is easy to compute what would have happened if the position in the 10-year
zero-coupon bonds was left unhedged in the last example. When rearranged, equation
(23.6) says
dP
DURdr
P
suggesting that a 10 basis point increase in interest rates (for example, from 9 percent
to 9.1 percent) would decrease the value of the bond portfolio by
.001DUR .00110 .01, or 1%
Hence, the $1 million (face amount) bond investment in the last example, which cost
$456,387, would decline by 1 percent of $456,387, or $4,564, if left unhedged. Under
this same interest rate change scenario, the $1.35 million (face value) of 5-year zero-
coupon bonds also would decline in value by $4,564. Hence, Giuliana constructs a port-
folio that has no interest rate sensitivity by selling short $1.35 million of the 5-year
bonds.
Duration targeting is often used to perfectly hedge pension fund liabilities. Apen-
sion that funds its liability for retirement obligations with default-free bonds would
want the bonds to have the same interest rate sensitivity as the liabilities. An over-
funded pension plan with this property guarantees that there will be no shortage of
funds for the pension liabilities as a result of interest rate changes. Example 23.9 indi-
cates how to target the duration of pension assets to hedge pension liabilities with this
purpose in mind.
Example 23.9:Changing the Duration of Pension Fund Assets
As the new manager of the pension fund of the University of California Retirement System,
assume that you have analyzed the defined benefits of the plan and computed that the fund’s
liabilities amount to an $8 billion market value obligation with a duration of 12 years.Unfor-
tunately, while the fund has $9 billion in assets, largely consisting of bonds, their duration is
only 8 years.This means that a steep decline in interest rates may increase the present
value of the obligations by $1 billion more than such a decline increases the value of the
fund’s assets.While keeping a $1 billion surplus in the pension fund, how can a self-financing
investment in 5-year Treasury notes, with a duration of 4 years, and 30-year Treasury bonds,
with a duration of 10 years, eliminate this problem?
Answer:If xdenotes the amount invested in 30-year bonds and an equivalent dollar
amount of 5-year bonds are sold short, the duration of the pension fund assets becomes
xx
DUR 8 years 10 years 4 years
$9 billion$9 billion
The ratio of the market values of the assets to the liabilities is 9/8.Hence, the duration of
2
the assets should be 103years, or 8/9 the 12-year duration of the liabilities to perfectly
23$4 billion.Thus,
hedge interest risk.Solving for xabove with DUR 10years implies x
buying $4 billion in 30-year bonds and selling short $4 billion in 5-year bonds will result in
the interest rate sensitivity of the pension fund assets matching that of the liabilities.
Example 23.9 points out how to eliminate interest rate sensitivity by matching
assets and liabilities in a particular way. The next section examines how to carry this
-
Grinblatt
1678 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1678 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
834Part VIRisk Management
idea forward through time in order to fix an amount available for payment at some
horizon date.