- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
23Risk Management
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
1.Describe the concept of DV01,the dollar value of a one-basis-point decrease (in
original and term structure variations) and the concept of duration (in MacAuley,
modified, and present value variations).
2.Understand the relation between duration and DV01,and the formulas needed to
use either concept for hedging.
3.Implement immunization and contingent immunization strategies, using both
duration and DV01.
4.Explain the link between immunization and hedging, and how to use this link to
manage the asset base and capital structure of financial institutions.
5.Understand and compute convexity, and know how to use it properly.
In 1995, Orange County, California, declared bankruptcy. This bankruptcy can be
attributed to the investments of the county treasurer, Robert Citron. In late 1994,
between one-third and one-half of Citron’s investments were in “inverse floaters,”
floating rate bonds with cash flows that decline as interest rates increase and vice
versa. The inverse floaters paid 17 percent less twice the short-term interest rate, as
long as this number was positive. The value of these esoteric notes was about three
times more sensitive to interest rate movements than fixed-rate debt of comparable
maturity. Moreover, Orange County leveraged these positions through repurchase
agreements, making the positions three times larger in size than the cash spent on
them and therefore about nine times more sensitive to interest rate movements than
an unleveraged position in fixed-rate debt of comparable maturity. It did not take a
very large increase in interest rates to wipe out Orange County’s pool of investable
funds.1
1
We are grateful to Richard Roll for providing us with some of the details of this bankruptcy.
818
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
819
Chapter 22 described how to hedge many of the sources of risk that corporations
face. Here we complete the work in that chapter by analyzing how to change the
firm’s exposure to an interest rate risk factor. Interest rate risk deserves special treat-
ment because interest rates, in addition to their possible effect on future cash flows,
generally affect the present values of cash flows owing to their role in discounting. It
is this latter role that makes interest rate risk unique.
In this chapter, you will learn how interest rate risk is managed. The chapter
abstracts from the influence of interest rates on future cash flows by assuming that
future cash flows are certain. Hence, the risk analysis here focuses only on the role of
interest rates in determining present values.
The key to this analysis is understanding the relationship between the price of a
financial instrument with riskless future cash flows (that is, a default-free bond) and its
yield to maturity.2
We introduce two important concepts that describe this relationship,
DV01and duration,compare them to one another, and describe several important appli-
cations of each.
In addition to studying the use of these tools for measuring interest rate risk and
designing hedges, the chapter examines immunization, which is the management of a
portfolio of fixed income investments so that they will have a riskless value at some
future date, and the concept of convexity, which is a measure of the curvature in the
price-yield relationship. Convexity is frequently used and misused in bond portfolio
analysis and management. We will try to understand the proper use of convexity as
well as the pitfalls that lead to its misuse.
Obviously, bond portfolio managers and high-level financial managers in banks and
other financial institutions should be familiar with the tools introduced in this chapter.
However, it also is important for other individuals, such as corporate treasurers, to
acquaint themselves with these tools. For example, the debt issued by a corporation is
priced by the bond market. To properly analyze the firm’s debt financing costs, it is
essential for corporate treasurers to understand how interest rates affect bond prices. In
addition, corporate treasurers often have to fund, manage, or supervise the management
of a corporate pension fund. Frequently, the assets in such funds are debt instruments.
It would be difficult to meet the obligations of these pension funds without knowledge
of the interest rate risk of both the obligations and the debt instruments held by the
fund, as well as how to manage this risk. More generally, corporations typically target
a maturity structure of their debt, measured as the debt’s duration, which is tied to the
interest rate sensitivity of the debt.3
How to achieve that target is one subject of this
chapter.
In much of this chapter, we assume that there is a flat term structure of interest
rates. Hence, there is only one discount rate for risk-free cash flows of any maturity.
Later in the chapter, we relax this simplifying assumption and discuss how to extend
the analysis to deal with discount rates that vary with the maturity of the cash flow.
The results obtained for hedge ratios and immunization strategies in this chapter work
well in most realistic settings, despite being based on assumptions that, while virtu-
ous for the simplicity they add, are not entirely realistic and may even be logically
inconsistent.
2For expositional clarity, we will often use the generic term bondto refer to all debt instruments.
While we recognize that there are important legal and economic distinctions between bonds, notes, bills,
and bank debt, such distinctions are not critical for the analysis in this chapter.
3Chapters 16 and 21 broadly touched on the reasons why corporations might want short-term instead
of long-term debt.
-
Grinblatt
1650 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1650 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
820 |
Part VIRisk Management |
23.1 |
The DollarValue of a One Basis Point Decrease (DV01) |
Once corporate managers have measured the interest rate risk exposure of a corpora-
tion or project, they can reduce the risk exposure of equity holders by acquiring or issu-
ing bonds, the values of which move in an opposite direction from the value of the
corporation or project as interest rates change. To implement a strategy like this, the
financial manager needs to acquire familiarity with the tools of interest rate risk man-
agement.
One of the most important tools for understanding the relation between interest rates,
as measured by a bond’s yield-to-maturity, and bond prices is the “dollar value of a one
basis point (bp) decrease,” or DV01,4
which is a measure of how much a bond’s price
will increase in response to a one basis point decline in a bond’s yield to maturity. If
the yield and interest rates are the same—as they would be if there is a flat term struc-
ture of interest rates—then DV01s will be useful for estimating interest rate risk. In this
case, because high DV01bonds are more sensitive to interest rate movements than low
DV01bonds, they also are more volatile than low DV01bonds. In a corporate setting,
firms with values that have high DV01s are more exposed to interest rate risk. Hence,
if a corporation measures the risk exposure of its stock as having a negative DV01(for
example, share prices go up when interest rates rise), acquiring a bond position with a
positive DV01will reduce the interest rate exposure of the corporation’s equity.
In reality, yields and interest rates differ because the term structure is not flat, mak-
ing DV01an inexact hedging tool. DV01,however, works remarkably well as a hedg-
ing tool despite this potential problem, as the introduction to this chapter noted.
Methods Used to Compute DV01for Traded Bonds
The various ways to compute the DV01of a bond are outlined below:
Method 1: Price at a Yield One Basis Point Below Existing Yield Less Price at
Existing Yield.The method we will generally use to compute a bond’s DV01is the
negative of the change in its full price5
for a one basis point decreasein its
yield-to-maturity. One basis point is 1 100th of 1 percent, implying, for example, that
a one basis point decrease in a 10 percent yield to maturity is a decrease from 10.00
percent to 9.99 percent. This is a very small decrease because DV01is intended to
approximate, in absolute magnitude, the derivative of the bond price movement with
respect to the bond’s yield to maturity.This derivative is the slope of the price-yield
curve pictured in Exhibit 23.1.6DV01is determined by a one basis point decreasein
interest rates, so that the DV01is positive for most bonds.7
Method 2: Use Calculus to Compute the Derivative of the Price-Yield Relation-
ship Directly.Some bond market participants use calculus to define the DV01as the
negative of the slope of the price-yield curve. In this case, the DV01of a bond with a
price of Pis computed as
-
dP
DV01 .0001
(23.1)
dr
4
DV01is often referred to as the price value of a basis point (PVBP).
5
See Chapter 2 for a description of full and flat bond prices.
6
The derivative is negative because of the inverse relationship between price and yield.
7This avoids the awkwardness of always having to remember to place a minus sign in front.
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23Interest Rate Risk Management
821
EXHIBIT23.1Inverse Relation between Price and Yield
Price
Yield
In equation (23.1), r,the bond yield, is given in decimal form. This gives a
slightly different answer than method 1 because a one basis point decline, although
small, is not infinitesimally small, as would be the case with the derivative
calculation.
11
Method 3: Price at a Yield Basis Point Below Less Price at Basis Point Above
22
Existing Yield.To approximate method 2’s derivative calculation more accurately
than method 1, some practitioners compute DV01by subtracting the bond’s present
11
value at basis point above the current yield to maturity from its present value at
22
basis point below the current yield. As with method 1, this definition of DV01requires
only a calculator for its computation, thus avoiding the use of calculus.
Using a Financial Calculatorto Compute DV01 with Method 1.The differences
between these versions of DV01are negligible. We employ method 1 for most of the
examples in this chapter, as in Example 23.1.
Example 23.1:Computing DV01
Compute the DV01per $100 face value of a 20-year straight-coupon bond trading at par
(see Chapter 2 for a definition) with a semiannual coupon and an 8 percent yield to maturity.
Answer:Using a financial calculator or computing the present value by hand, we find
that at a discount rate of 7.99 percent, the 8 percent coupon bond should trade for approx-
imately $100.10.At a discount rate of 8 percent, it trades at $100.Thus, the DV01or dif-
ference is $0.10 per $100 of face value.
-
Grinblatt
1654 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1654 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
822Part VIRisk Management
Using DV01to Estimate Price Changes
One can use DV01to estimate the price change of a bond or a bond portfolio for small
changes in the level of interest rates, as measured by the bond’s yield. To obtain the
formula for this estimate, rearrange equation (23.1) as follows.
dP DV0110,000dr
Because 10,000 ris the yield change in number of basis points, the noncalculus equiv-
alent of this equation is
-
P DV01(bp)
(23.2)
where
P the change in the bond’s price
bp the interest rate change (in basis points).
Example 23.2 demonstrates how to use this formula to estimate bond price changes.
Example 23.2:Estimating Bond Price Changes with DV01
A bond position has a DV01of $300.Its yield is currently 8.0 percent.Estimate the change
in the value of the bond position if the yield drops to 7.9 percent.
Answer:Using equation (23.2), a drop of 10 basis points gives a price increase of
P $300 (10) $3,000
Note from equation (23.2) that if the DV01is zero, the change in the price for a
small change in yield is zero. We will discuss how to use this insight for interest rate
hedging shortly.
DV01s of Various Bond Types and Portfolios
Bonds with long maturities tend to have higher DV01s than short-maturity bonds with
similar values. Zero-coupon bonds with long maturities tend to have low DV01s
because their prices are low. As a percentage of the price, however, the volatilities of
these bonds tend to be high.
DV01s are proportional to the size of a bond position. The DV01of a $1,000,000
position in a bond (face value or market value) is 10 times the DV01of a $100,000
position in that same bond. To obtain the DV01of a bond portfolio, add up the DV01s
of all the components in that portfolio.
Practitioners often scale DV01to be DV01per $100 of face value or per $1 mil-
lion of face value. This scaling makes it easy to compare individual bonds, but it is a
minor inconvenience when determining the sensitivity of a bond portfolio’s total value
to yield changes. To overcome this inconvenience, first convert the DV01s per $100 or
DV01s per $1 million into the DV01s of the total face values of each bond in the port-
folio. Then, add the DV01s of the components of the portfolio to obtain the DV01of
the portfolio itself. Keep in mind two helpful rules when computing the DV01of a
portfolio of bonds:
-
•
To convert a DV01per $100 face value to a DV01per actual face value,multiply the actual face value of the portfolio’s position in the bond by theDV01per $100 face value and then divide by $100.
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
823
-
•
To convert a DV01per $1 million face value to a DV01per actual face value,multiply the actual face value of the portfolio’s position in the bond by theDV01per $1 million face value and then divide by $1 million.
Example 23.3 uses the first of these two rules to compute the DV01of a portfolio of
bonds.
Example 23.3:The DV01of a Portfolio of Bonds
Assume that the DV01of a 30-year U.S.Treasury bond is $0.10 per $100 face amount, the
DV01of a 10-year U.S.Treasury note is $0.06 per $100 face amount, and the DV01of a
5-year U.S.Treasury note is $0.04 per $100 face amount.Compute the DV01of a portfolio
that has $5 million (face value) of 30-year bonds, $8 million (face value) of 5-year notes, and
(a short position) –$16 million (face value) of 10-year notes.
Answer:Sum the products of (a) the face amounts over $100 and (b) the corresponding
DV01s per $100.The result is
$5 million$8 million$16 million
($.10) ($.04) ($.06)
DV01
$100$100$100
$5,000$3,200$9,600 $1,400
The negative DV01means that the position’s value increases when interest rates rise.
Using DV01s to Hedge Interest Rate Risk
DV01s are commonly used for interest rate hedging. This subsection discusses the hedg-
ing of interest rate risk in both investment management and corporate settings.
Hedging the Interest Rate Risk of a Bond Portfolio.Aperfectly hedged bond port-
folio is a portfolio with no sensitivity to interest rate movements. Result 23.1 charac-
terizes such a portfolio in terms of DV01.
-
Result 23.1
If the term structure of interest rates is flat, a bond portfolio with a DV01of zero has nosensitivity to interest rate movements.
Example 23.4 illustrates how to construct a portfolio with a DV01of zero.
Example 23.4:Using DV01s to Form Perfect Hedge Portfolios
Assume that changes in the yields of various maturity bonds are identical.How much of a
7-year bond, with a computed DV01of $0.05 per $100 of face value, should be purchased
to perfectly hedge the interest rate risk of the portfolio in Example 23.3, which has a DV01
of $1,400?
Answer:The portfolio to be hedged has a DV01of $1,400.The DV01of the portfolio
if we buy $xface amount of the 7-year bond is
$0.05x
$1,400
100
This equals zero when xis $2.8 million.Thus, a $2.8 million face amount of 7-year bonds
hedges the portfolio against interest rate risk.
Equation (23.2) suggests that for the unhedged portfolio constructed in Exam-
ple 23.3, a 10 basis point decrease in interest rates (for example, rates decrease from
-
Grinblatt
1658 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1658 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
824Part VIRisk Management
9.0 percent to 8.9 percent) would (approximately) result in a decline of $14,000 in
the portfolio’s value. However, after implementing the hedge in Example 23.4, the
DV01of the overall portfolio is zero, so the change in the hedged portfolio’s value
for a 10 bp decrease in rates is zero (approximately). In this case, the $14,000
decline in the formerly unhedged portfolio is offset by a $14,000 increase in the
$2.8 million of 7-year bonds.
Dynamically Updating the Hedge.The hedge in Example 23.4 needs to be con-
stantly readjusted because as time elapses or bond prices change, the DV01s of bonds
change. Thus, it will be necessary to sell or buy additional 7-year bonds as time
elapses to maintain a DV01of zero. In practice, to save on transaction costs, this
updating usually involves waiting until a critical threshold of positive or negative
DV01for the “hedged” portfolio is reached before rehedging. The size of the thresh-
old depends on the size of the transaction costs for rehedging and the investor’s aver-
sion to interest rate risk.
Managing Corporate Interest Rate Risk Exposure.Hedging corporate exposure to
interest rate risk is virtually identical to hedging the interest rate risk in a bond port-
folio. If we estimate a corporation’s interest rate risk exposure to be a DV01of
$1,400, then $2.8 million of the 7-year bonds would perfectly hedge the corporation
against interest rate risk.
It is also possible to use the mathematics of Example 23.4 to illustrate how to tar-
get an interest rate risk exposure that differs from zero.
Example 23.5:Using DV01s to Form Imperfect Hedges
The 7-year bond from the last example has a DV01of $0.05 per $100 face value.Assum-
ing that changes in the yields of bonds of various maturities are identical, how much of the
7-year bond should be bought to change the corporate risk exposure, measured currently
as a DV01of $1,400, to a risk exposure with a DV01of $400?
Answer:Because portfolio DV01s are additive, if we buy $xface amount of the 7-year
bond, the DV01of the “portfolio”consisting of the corporation and $xof the 7-year bonds is
.05x
$1,400
100
The sum of these two terms is $400 when xequals $2 million.Thus, the $2 million face
amount of 7-year bonds generates the target interest rate risk exposure.
How Compounding Frequency Affects the Stated DV01
The stated yield to maturity of a bond depends on the compounding frequency used
for the yield.8Hence, the meaning of a 1 bp decline in yield and the size of the cor-
responding DV01depend on whether annual, semiannual, or monthly compounding is
used. The customary frequency for reporting DV01s and yields to maturity depends on
the bond’s coupon frequency. For example, DV01s for residential mortgages are typi-
cally based on monthly compounded 1 bp declines. DV01s for corporate bonds are
reported from semiannually compounded 1 bp declines.
8See Chapter 9.
Grinblatt |
VI. Risk Management |
23. Interest Rate Risk |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
|
Management |
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 23
Interest Rate Risk Management
825
For hedging purposes, the compounding frequency for the 1 bp decline is irrele-
vant as long as the analyst consistently uses the same compounding frequency when
computing DV01s for all the relevant investments. Maintaining this consistency might
require some DV01conversions. The DV01conversions between compounding fre-
quencies are given in the following result:
-
Result
23.2
Let rand rdenote the annualized yield to maturity of the same bond computed with yields
nm
compounded ntimes a year and mtimes a year, respectively. The DV01for a bond (or
rr
portfolio) using compounding of mtimes a year is nmtimes the DV01
11
nm
ntimes a year.9
of the bond using a compounding frequency of
9
Here is a calculus proof of Result 23.2: Equation (23.1) states that
dP
DV01 (for r) .0001
mdr
m
while
dP
DV01 (for r) .0001
ndr
n
where rand rare equivalent annualized rates of interest for compounding that occurs mtimes a year
mn
and ntimes a year, respectively. Dividing each side of the second equation into the corresponding sides
of the first equation, we get
DV01 (for r)dr
mn
DV01 (for r)dr
nm
or
dr
DV01 (for r) n DV01 (for r)
mdrn
m
r
n
1
drn
To prove that n
,we refer the reader to Chapter 9. There, we learned that two equivalent
drr
mm
1
m
rates that compound mtimes a year and ntimes a year satisfy the condition that the future value of a
dollar after one year must be the same; that is
rnrm
n m
11
nm
After taking the natural logarithm of both sides of this equation, this is equivalent to
rr
n ln n m lnm
11
nm
Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to ryields
m
1dr1
rn
drr
nmm
11
nm
When rearranged, this says
r
n
1
drn
n
drr
mm
1
m
-
Grinblatt
1662 Titman: FinancialVI. Risk Management
23. Interest Rate Risk
© The McGraw
1662 HillMarkets and Corporate
Management
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
826Part VIRisk Management
