- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
3.1Types of Equity Securities
Firms obtain equity capital either internally by earning money and retaining it within
the firm or externally by issuing new equity securities. There are three different
kinds of equity that a firm can issue: (1) common stock, (2) preferred stock, and
(3)warrants.
Common Stock
Common stockis a share of ownership in a corporation that usually entitles its hold-
ers to vote on the corporation’s affairs. The common stockholders of a firm are gener-
ally viewed as the firm’s owners. They are entitled to the firm’s profits after other con-
tractual claims on the firm are satisfied and have the ultimate control over how the firm
is operated.3
Some firms have two classes of common stock (dual-class shares), usually called
class Aand class B, which differ in terms of their votes per share. Dual-class com-
monstockis largely confined to firms that are majority controlled by some person or
group. Such firms include Ford Motor, Reader’s Digest, Smucker’s, the Washington
Post Group, and Adolph Coors. These firms were family-owned firms until they grew
too large to be financed by the family alone. Because the families did not want to give
up control, they created two classes of common stock, with one class having more votes
per share than the other class. In these situations, family members will usually own the
majority of the shares with the greater voting power. Although only a limited number
of U.S. firms have more than one class of common stock, multiple classes of stock
with different voting rights are popular outside the United States. The stocks in a
number of countries outside the United States are divided into Aand B classes, with
1In reality, however, managers may be more influenced by bankers and other debt holders with whom
they must deal on a day-to-day basis than by shareholders with whom they have much less contact.
Isssues relating to who controls corporations will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 18.
2In this way, the U.S. tax code favors debt over equity financing. The tax advantages of debt versus
equity financing will be discussed in great detail in Chapters 13, 14, and 15.
3As Chapter 18 discusses, it is often difficult for stockholders to exercise their control.
-
Grinblatt
164 Titman: FinancialI. Financial Markets and
3. Equity Financing
© The McGraw
164 HillMarkets and Corporate
Financial Instruments
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
70Part IFinancial Markets and Financial Instruments
foreigners restricted to holding the B shares, which often have no voting rights. In some
cases, the B shares have voting rights, but not enough to permit foreigners to control
the firm.
Preferred Stock
Preferred stockis a financial instrument that gives its holders a claim on a firm’s earn-
ings that must be paid before dividends on its common stock can be paid. Preferred
stock also is a senior claim in the event of reorganization or liquidation,which is the
sale of the assets of the company. However, the claims of preferred stockholders are
always junior to the claims of the firm’s debt holders. Preferred stock is used much
less than common stock as a source of capital. The biggest issuers of preferred stock
have historically been electric utilities which have been allowed to claim the dividends
as an expense when setting electricity rates. Because of tax advantages, financial insti-
tutions recently have become big issuers of new kinds of preferred stock that are
described below.
Preferred stock is like debt in that its dividend is fixed at the time of sale. In
some cases, preferred stock has a maturity date much like a bond. In other cases,
preferred stock is more like common stock in that it never matures. Preferred shares
are almost always cumulative:If the corporation stops paying dividends, the unpaid
dividends accumulate and must be paid in full before any dividends can be paid to
common shareholders. At the same time, a firm generally cannot be forced into bank-
ruptcy for not paying its preferred dividends.4The voting rights of preferred stock
differ from instrument to instrument. Preferred stockholders do not always have
voting rights, but they often obtain voting rights when the preferred dividends are
suspended.
Convertible Preferred.Convertible preferred stockis similar to the convertible
debt instruments described in Chapter 2. These instruments have the properties of pre-
ferred stock prior to being converted, but can be converted into the common stock of
the issuer at the preferred shareholder’s discretion. In addition to the standard features
of preferred stock, convertible preferred stock specifies the number of common shares
into which each preferred share can be converted.
Adjustable-Rate Preferred.About half the preferred stock issued in the 1990s was
some variant of adjustable-rate preferred stock, an instrument that was invented in
the 1980s. This kind of preferred stock goes by various acronyms, including ARPS
(adjustable-rate preferred stock), DARTS (Dutch auction rate stock), APS (auction pre-
ferred stock), and RP(remarketed preferred). In each form of adjustable-rate preferred
stock, the dividend is adjusted quarterly (sometimes monthly) by an amount determined
by the change in some short-term interest rate. Most of the adjustable-rate preferred
stock is sold by financial institutions seeking deposits and is bought by corporate finan-
cial managers seeking a tax-advantaged investment for short-term funds. The tax advan-
tage arises because, as of 1997, U.S. corporations may exclude from taxable income
70 percent of the dividends received from the preferred or common shares of another
domestic corporation.5Leveraged municipal bond funds also use this type of preferred
stock as a source of capital.
4For the newer kinds of preferred stock, discussed below, preferred shareholders can sometimes force
the firm into bankruptcy.
5We will discuss this in greater detail in Chapter 15.
Grinblatt |
I. Financial Markets and |
3. Equity Financing |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
Financial Instruments |
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 3
Equity Financing
71
MIPS.One of the biggest advantages of preferred stock is that it allows corporations
to issue a debtlike security without lowering the ratings on their existing debt. How-
ever, in contrast to a debt security with its tax-deductible interest, preferred stock has
the disadvantage that its dividends are not tax deductible. In response to the desire for
a security that provides the best of debt and preferred equity, investment bankers have
developed a security they call either MIPS (monthly income preferred securities) or
trust preferred securities.
Texaco’s Monthly Income Preferred Securities (MIPS)
In October 1993 Goldman Sachs and Texaco brought the first MIPS issue to market.
Monthly income preferred securities (MIPS)combine features of debt and equity. Like
equity, they pay dividends, they can be perpetual, the dividends can be deferred if there are
cash flow problems, and they aren’t counted as debt on the firm’s balance sheet. Like debt,
however, they carry a fixed payment, they are rated by the rating agencies, and the pay-
ments to investors are classified as tax-deductible interest. The cash flows can be dividends
to investors and interest to the firm through a special tax trick in which a wholly owned
financing subsidiary is created that issues the preferred stock and then loans the proceeds
to the parent company. The interest payments are passed back to the subsidiary, which records
these payments as dividends to investors who are classified as partners of the subsidiary. This
convoluted arrangement allowed Texaco to issue MIPS at their A-rated dividend yield of
6.875 percent but to have an after-tax financing rate of approximately 4.6 percent per year.
Source: Reprinted by permission of The Wall Street Journal,©1995 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights
Reserved Worldwide.
Akey distinction between a MIPS and a typical preferred security is that the MIPS
can defer the dividends for only five years while standard preferred stock can defer the
dividends indefinitely. Unlike standard preferred stock, MIPS can force the firm into
bankruptcy for failure to pay the dividend on this instrument. The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) has ruled that this distinction is sufficient to make the dividends on MIPS
tax deductible, which in turn implies that corporate holders of these instruments are
taxed on the entire dividend.6
Warrants
There are several other equity-related securities that firms issue to finance their oper-
ations. Firms sometimes issue warrants, which are long-term call options on the issu-
ing firm’s stock. Call options7give their holders the right to buy shares of the firm at
a prespecified price for a given period of time. These options are often included as part
of a unit offering, which includes two or more securities offered as a package. For
example, firms might try to sell one common share and one warrant as a unit. Schultz
(1990) suggested that this kind of unit offering serves as a form of staged financing in
which investors have an option to either invest more in the firm if it is successful or
to shut it down by refusing to invest at the option’s prespecified price. Warrants also
are often bundled with a firm’s bond and preferred stock offerings.
