- •Intended Audience
- •1.1 Financing the Firm
- •1.2Public and Private Sources of Capital
- •1.3The Environment forRaising Capital in the United States
- •Investment Banks
- •1.4Raising Capital in International Markets
- •1.5MajorFinancial Markets outside the United States
- •1.6Trends in Raising Capital
- •Innovative Instruments
- •2.1Bank Loans
- •2.2Leases
- •2.3Commercial Paper
- •2.4Corporate Bonds
- •2.5More Exotic Securities
- •2.6Raising Debt Capital in the Euromarkets
- •2.7Primary and Secondary Markets forDebt
- •2.8Bond Prices, Yields to Maturity, and Bond Market Conventions
- •2.9Summary and Conclusions
- •3.1Types of Equity Securities
- •Volume of Financing with Different Equity Instruments
- •3.2Who Owns u.S. Equities?
- •3.3The Globalization of Equity Markets
- •3.4Secondary Markets forEquity
- •International Secondary Markets for Equity
- •3.5Equity Market Informational Efficiency and Capital Allocation
- •3.7The Decision to Issue Shares Publicly
- •3.8Stock Returns Associated with ipOs of Common Equity
- •Ipo Underpricing of u.S. Stocks
- •4.1Portfolio Weights
- •4.2Portfolio Returns
- •4.3Expected Portfolio Returns
- •4.4Variances and Standard Deviations
- •4.5Covariances and Correlations
- •4.6Variances of Portfolios and Covariances between Portfolios
- •Variances for Two-Stock Portfolios
- •4.7The Mean-Standard Deviation Diagram
- •4.8Interpreting the Covariance as a Marginal Variance
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orSelling Short the Position in
- •Increasing a Stock Position Financed by Reducing orShorting a Position in a
- •4.9Finding the Minimum Variance Portfolio
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Two Stocks
- •Identifying the Minimum Variance Portfolio of Many Stocks
- •Investment Applications of Mean-Variance Analysis and the capm
- •5.2The Essentials of Mean-Variance Analysis
- •5.3The Efficient Frontierand Two-Fund Separation
- •5.4The Tangency Portfolio and Optimal Investment
- •Identification of the Tangency Portfolio
- •5.5Finding the Efficient Frontierof Risky Assets
- •5.6How Useful Is Mean-Variance Analysis forFinding
- •5.8The Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Implications for Optimal Investment
- •5.9Estimating Betas, Risk-Free Returns, Risk Premiums,
- •Improving the Beta Estimated from Regression
- •Identifying the Market Portfolio
- •5.10Empirical Tests of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
- •Is the Value-Weighted Market Index Mean-Variance Efficient?
- •Interpreting the capm’s Empirical Shortcomings
- •5.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •6.1The Market Model:The First FactorModel
- •6.2The Principle of Diversification
- •Insurance Analogies to Factor Risk and Firm-Specific Risk
- •6.3MultifactorModels
- •Interpreting Common Factors
- •6.5FactorBetas
- •6.6Using FactorModels to Compute Covariances and Variances
- •6.7FactorModels and Tracking Portfolios
- •6.8Pure FactorPortfolios
- •6.9Tracking and Arbitrage
- •6.10No Arbitrage and Pricing: The Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •Verifying the Existence of Arbitrage
- •Violations of the aptEquation fora Small Set of Stocks Do Not Imply Arbitrage.
- •Violations of the aptEquation by Large Numbers of Stocks Imply Arbitrage.
- •6.11Estimating FactorRisk Premiums and FactorBetas
- •6.12Empirical Tests of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory
- •6.13 Summary and Conclusions
- •7.1Examples of Derivatives
- •7.2The Basics of Derivatives Pricing
- •7.3Binomial Pricing Models
- •7.4Multiperiod Binomial Valuation
- •7.5Valuation Techniques in the Financial Services Industry
- •7.6Market Frictions and Lessons from the Fate of Long-Term
- •7.7Summary and Conclusions
- •8.1ADescription of Options and Options Markets
- •8.2Option Expiration
- •8.3Put-Call Parity
- •Insured Portfolio
- •8.4Binomial Valuation of European Options
- •8.5Binomial Valuation of American Options
- •Valuing American Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks
- •8.6Black-Scholes Valuation
- •8.7Estimating Volatility
- •Volatility
- •8.8Black-Scholes Price Sensitivity to Stock Price, Volatility,
- •Interest Rates, and Expiration Time
- •8.9Valuing Options on More Complex Assets
- •Implied volatility
- •8.11 Summary and Conclusions
- •9.1 Cash Flows ofReal Assets
- •9.2Using Discount Rates to Obtain Present Values
- •Value Additivity and Present Values of Cash Flow Streams
- •Inflation
- •9.3Summary and Conclusions
- •10.1Cash Flows
- •10.2Net Present Value
- •Implications of Value Additivity When Evaluating Mutually Exclusive Projects.
- •10.3Economic Value Added (eva)
- •10.5Evaluating Real Investments with the Internal Rate of Return
- •Intuition for the irrMethod
- •10.7 Summary and Conclusions
- •10A.1Term Structure Varieties
- •10A.2Spot Rates, Annuity Rates, and ParRates
- •11.1Tracking Portfolios and Real Asset Valuation
- •Implementing the Tracking Portfolio Approach
- •11.2The Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Method
- •11.3The Effect of Leverage on Comparisons
- •11.4Implementing the Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate Formula with
- •11.5Pitfalls in Using the Comparison Method
- •11.6Estimating Beta from Scenarios: The Certainty Equivalent Method
- •Identifying the Certainty Equivalent from Models of Risk and Return
- •11.7Obtaining Certainty Equivalents with Risk-Free Scenarios
- •Implementing the Risk-Free Scenario Method in a Multiperiod Setting
- •11.8Computing Certainty Equivalents from Prices in Financial Markets
- •11.9Summary and Conclusions
- •11A.1Estimation Errorand Denominator-Based Biases in Present Value
- •11A.2Geometric versus Arithmetic Means and the Compounding-Based Bias
- •12.2Valuing Strategic Options with the Real Options Methodology
- •Valuing a Mine with No Strategic Options
- •Valuing a Mine with an Abandonment Option
- •Valuing Vacant Land
- •Valuing the Option to Delay the Start of a Manufacturing Project
- •Valuing the Option to Expand Capacity
- •Valuing Flexibility in Production Technology: The Advantage of Being Different
- •12.3The Ratio Comparison Approach
- •12.4The Competitive Analysis Approach
- •12.5When to Use the Different Approaches
- •Valuing Asset Classes versus Specific Assets
- •12.6Summary and Conclusions
- •13.1Corporate Taxes and the Evaluation of Equity-Financed
- •Identifying the Unlevered Cost of Capital
- •13.2The Adjusted Present Value Method
- •Valuing a Business with the wacc Method When a Debt Tax Shield Exists
- •Investments
- •IsWrong
- •Valuing Cash Flow to Equity Holders
- •13.5Summary and Conclusions
- •14.1The Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •IsFalse
- •14.2How an Individual InvestorCan “Undo” a Firm’s Capital
- •14.3How Risky Debt Affects the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •14.4How Corporate Taxes Affect the Capital Structure Choice
- •14.6Taxes and Preferred Stock
- •14.7Taxes and Municipal Bonds
- •14.8The Effect of Inflation on the Tax Gain from Leverage
- •14.10Are There Tax Advantages to Leasing?
- •14.11Summary and Conclusions
- •15.1How Much of u.S. Corporate Earnings Is Distributed to Shareholders?Aggregate Share Repurchases and Dividends
- •15.2Distribution Policy in Frictionless Markets
- •15.3The Effect of Taxes and Transaction Costs on Distribution Policy
- •15.4How Dividend Policy Affects Expected Stock Returns
- •15.5How Dividend Taxes Affect Financing and Investment Choices
- •15.6Personal Taxes, Payout Policy, and Capital Structure
- •15.7Summary and Conclusions
- •16.1Bankruptcy
- •16.3How Chapter11 Bankruptcy Mitigates Debt Holder–Equity HolderIncentive Problems
- •16.4How Can Firms Minimize Debt Holder–Equity Holder
- •Incentive Problems?
- •17.1The StakeholderTheory of Capital Structure
- •17.2The Benefits of Financial Distress with Committed Stakeholders
- •17.3Capital Structure and Competitive Strategy
- •17.4Dynamic Capital Structure Considerations
- •17.6 Summary and Conclusions
- •18.1The Separation of Ownership and Control
- •18.2Management Shareholdings and Market Value
- •18.3How Management Control Distorts Investment Decisions
- •18.4Capital Structure and Managerial Control
- •Investment Strategy?
- •18.5Executive Compensation
- •Is Executive Pay Closely Tied to Performance?
- •Is Executive Compensation Tied to Relative Performance?
- •19.1Management Incentives When Managers Have BetterInformation
- •19.2Earnings Manipulation
- •Incentives to Increase or Decrease Accounting Earnings
- •19.4The Information Content of Dividend and Share Repurchase
- •19.5The Information Content of the Debt-Equity Choice
- •19.6Empirical Evidence
- •19.7Summary and Conclusions
- •20.1AHistory of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.2Types of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.3 Recent Trends in TakeoverActivity
- •20.4Sources of TakeoverGains
- •Is an Acquisition Required to Realize Tax Gains, Operating Synergies,
- •Incentive Gains, or Diversification?
- •20.5The Disadvantages of Mergers and Acquisitions
- •20.7Empirical Evidence on the Gains from Leveraged Buyouts (lbOs)
- •20.8 Valuing Acquisitions
- •Valuing Synergies
- •20.9Financing Acquisitions
- •Information Effects from the Financing of a Merger or an Acquisition
- •20.10Bidding Strategies in Hostile Takeovers
- •20.11Management Defenses
- •20.12Summary and Conclusions
- •21.1Risk Management and the Modigliani-MillerTheorem
- •Implications of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Hedging
- •21.2Why Do Firms Hedge?
- •21.4How Should Companies Organize TheirHedging Activities?
- •21.8Foreign Exchange Risk Management
- •Indonesia
- •21.9Which Firms Hedge? The Empirical Evidence
- •21.10Summary and Conclusions
- •22.1Measuring Risk Exposure
- •Volatility as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •Value at Risk as a Measure of Risk Exposure
- •22.2Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •Value at
- •22.3Hedging Short-Term Commitments with Maturity-Matched
- •22.4Hedging and Convenience Yields
- •22.5Hedging Long-Dated Commitments with Short-Maturing FuturesorForward Contracts
- •Intuition for Hedging with a Maturity Mismatch in the Presence of a Constant Convenience Yield
- •22.6Hedging with Swaps
- •22.7Hedging with Options
- •22.8Factor-Based Hedging
- •Instruments
- •22.10Minimum Variance Portfolios and Mean-Variance Analysis
- •22.11Summary and Conclusions
- •23Risk Management
- •23.2Duration
- •23.4Immunization
- •Immunization Using dv01
- •Immunization and Large Changes in Interest Rates
- •23.5Convexity
- •23.6Interest Rate Hedging When the Term Structure Is Not Flat
- •23.7Summary and Conclusions
- •Interest Rate
- •Interest Rate
2.5More Exotic Securities
One of the chief characteristics of financial markets is their ability to develop innova-
tive financial instruments. This section explores a few examples of these innovations
and the forces that drive them.
Tax and Regulatory Frictions as Motivators for Innovation
Firms issue innovative securities for many reasons, but two of the most important are
to escape the bite of taxes and regulation. The following is an example of a dual-
currency bond, an exotic innovative security driven by regulation.
RJR’s Dual-Currency Bonds
As part of the financing of RJR’s acquisition of Nabisco in 1985, Morgan Guaranty Trust
suggested a dual-currency Eurobond (defined shortly). The bond would pay the annual
coupons in yen, but the principal would be repaid in dollars.
There was a peculiar regulatory reason for issuing the dual-currency bond. Japanese
insurance funds could pay dividends to policyholders only out of the cash yield of invest-
ments. Thus, their need for high-coupon bonds was great. The bond suggested by Morgan
had a coupon of roughly 150 basis points higher than a competing straight Euroyen bond.
The larger coupon was compensated for by a favorable implicit forward currency exchange
rate that translated the yen principal into dollars.
16Moody’s —that is, what fraction of principal is recovered after a
(1994) estimates recovery rates
default has occurred—as varying from about 40 percent to 60 percent for corporate bonds. Bank debt
recovery rates tend to be about 20–30 percent higher.
-
Grinblatt
128 Titman: FinancialI. Financial Markets and
2. Debt Financing
© The McGraw
128 HillMarkets and Corporate
Financial Instruments
Companies, 2002
Strategy, Second Edition
52Part IFinancial Markets and Financial Instruments
The Japanese insurance companies were willing to take a loss at maturity in return for
higher coupons along the way. The dual-currency Eurobonds were much like private place-
ments because they were presold to the insurance companies and there was no secondary
market trading for them. Regulations also prohibited Japanese firms from holding more than
10 percent of assets in foreign securities. Despite the dollar payment at the end, the dual-
currency bond was not counted as a foreign security. RJR was able to issue the bond at just
30 basis points above Treasury yields at a time when other recent issues were priced to
yield 50 to 100 basis points above Treasuries.
Source: Kester and Allen (1991).
Collateralization as a Force for Innovation
Other recent innovations include the creation of asset-backed securities, which are
securities that are collateralized by cash flows from assets, like mortgages and accounts
receivable. The mortgage-backed securities market is perhaps the pioneer in this vein,
but other interesting examples abound. Asset-backed securities have become one of the
cheapest ways of turning an asset like receivables into ready cash.
In March 1994, for example, Northwest Airlines brought the first airline industry
asset-backed certificates to the market. They were backed by Northwest’s accounts
receivable—their ticket payments. The receivable certificates were sold in a private
placement, priced at LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points with a cap at 12 percent. Even
though Northwest was not in good financial shape, since the certificates were backed
by receivables, they obtained a AArating.17Similar asset-backed securities have been
issued by credit card companies and automobile financing units.
Macroeconomic Conditions and Financial Innovation
Occasionally, conditions that influence the macroeconomy, such as oil prices or infla-
tion, lead to innovative debt securities. For example, during the 1989 Kuwaiti crisis,
crude oil prices skyrocketed to about $40 per barrel although long-term oil prices, rep-
resented by prices in the forward market, were far lower. Several firms were convinced
by their investment banks that it was a good time to issue oil-linked bonds. Such bonds
were characterized by lower than normal coupon rates, allowing the corporate issuer to
save on interest payments. To compensate investors for the low coupon rate, the prin-
cipal to be paid was either four times the per-barrel price of crude oil at the maturity
of the bond or $100, whichever was larger. Salomon Brothers was one firm that showed
its corporate clients how to hedge the oil price risk of the principal payment by enter-
ing into forward contracts for oil.
Another example is Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS). First
begun in 1997, these Treasury notes and bonds pay a lower coupon rate than nor-
mal Treasury securities, again saving the issurer (the U.S. government) a sizable sum
in the short run. To compensate investors for the lower coupon, the principal on
which the coupon is paid grows each year—by the rate of inflation as measured by
the urban consumer price index. Similar securities have long been issued by other
nations, such as Israel and Canada, as well by businesses in countries with high rates
of inflation.
17Financing
Foreign Operations, Economist Intelligence Unit, March 1995.
Grinblatt |
I. Financial Markets and |
2. Debt Financing |
©
The McGraw |
Markets and Corporate |
Financial Instruments |
|
Companies, 2002 |
Strategy, Second Edition |
|
|
|
-
Chapter 2
Debt Financing
53
Financial Innovation in Emerging Capital Markets
Other frictions in the financial markets of some countries may drive financial innova-
tion. Firms located in countries with emerging capital markets can be just as inventive
as U.S. firms. In 1994, Avtovaz, a Russian automobile manufacturer, issued 300,000
bonds convertible into Ladas, the car it makes. If held to maturity, an Avtovaz bond is
redeemable for one Lada. For people who wanted an automobile, buying the Avtovaz
bond was an easy choice; at the time, the only other way to get a car in Russia was to
pay a bribe to be put at the top of the waiting list.
Another Russian example is Komineft, an oil company, issued zero-coupon bonds
whose principal was tied to the dollarprice of oil. Investors were thus protected against
the decline in the value of the ruble caused by Russian inflation.18
The Junk Bond Market and Financial Innovation
The junk bond market also has been a driving force for innovative security design.
Once the junk bond market took off, many innovations followed. Instead of straight
bonds with high coupons, firms began to issue bonds with special features and
embedded options. Thus, they created Zerfix bonds (short for zeroand fixed
coupons), a deferred coupon bond that consisted of an initial zero coupon followed
by a fixedcoupon after three to seven years. Zerfix bonds were intended to help the
issuing firm conserve cash. Similarly, firms issued PIK bonds, which gave them the
option to pay either in cash or in additional bonds. As an implicit promise to retire
or refinance debt, firms sold increasing-rate notes (IRNs), which required the firm
to increase the coupon quarterly at a predetermined rate in the range of 20–50 basis
points.
APerspective on the Pace of Financial Innovation
The pace of financial innovation has been remarkable given that new security designs
cannot be patented, are easily copied, and, once copied, their profitability to the inven-
tor drops dramatically.19
To encourage such a rapid pace of innovation, successful secu-
rity designs have to be phenomenally profitable to the inventor for that brief period of
time before competitors introduce imitations.
Will the pace of financial innovation ever slow down? As long as governments
continue to tax, regulate, and restrain trade, firms will devise ways to minimize taxes,
reduce the effectiveness of regulations, and overcome trading frictions in the economy.
Therefore, we expect financial innovation to continue.
