Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Casebook of The Jessup Competition v1.1.doc
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.04.2025
Размер:
375.81 Кб
Скачать

Consequences

The Rainbow Warrior case bolsters the notion that there is a doctrine of non-intervention in international law and that states will be punished for contravening it. It is also an interesting study of state responsibility, individual responsibility, use of force and reparations.

Its consideration for international law is slightly hampered by the fact that it was decided by a single individual (the UN secretary general) as a special Tribunal not internationally established. This is because there existed jurisdictional obstacles for an application to the ICJ by New Zealand, most importantly of which was that France did not (and still does not) recognise the jurisdiction of the Court as compulsory.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Warrior_Case_(international_law)

http://www.iilj.org/courses/documents/RainbowWarrior.pdf

http://untreaty.un.org/cod/riaa/cases/vol_XX/215-284.pdf

National Cases Government of Democratic Republic of the Congo V. Venne: Supreme Court of Canada, 1971

Canadian Venne hired Congo so that they'll stand a national pavilion. Venne built, but Congians refused to pay. Winnie has filed a Canadian court.

The judges said that absolute immunity gives way to a limited immunity already.

The court held that the actions of the Congo is acta jure imperii, a means of Congo may have immunity in Canadian courts.

Inter-Science Research and Development Services Ltd V. People's Republic of Mozambique: Full Transvaal Court, 1980

Mozambique has hired the company and refused to pay. The court said it acta jure gestionis and Mozambique should pay.

The court said that the international law to local and it is their duty to apply the rules international law.

1 No man can take advantage of his own wrong

27

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]