- •Unit 1 terrorism
- •Discussion:
- •I. Practice the pronunciation of the following words:
- •Text a definition of terrorism.
- •Politicization of the term
- •Active vocabulary
- •Comprehension check
- •Now decide whether the statement is true or false; correct those that are wrong:
- •Text b terrorism
- •Active vocabulary
- •To adopt terrorism as virtually a state policy;
- •A contested homeland;
- •Comprehension check
- •I. Answer the following questions to check how carefully you have read the texts:
- •II. Now decide whether the statement is true or false; correct those that are wrong:
- •Text c types of terrorism
- •Confines and definition
- •Methods of state terror
- •Extrajudicial execution
- •Acts labelled as state terrorism, sorted by state Chile
- •Germany
- •Soviet Union
- •United States
- •13. Cyber-terrorism
- •Terrorist action and thought
- •Types of political terrorism Revolutionary terrorism
- •Repressive terrorism
- •Active vocabulary
- •Comprehension check
- •II. Now decide whether the statement is true or false; correct those that are
- •Vocabulary exercises
- •Consult the Topical Vocabulary and learn expressions with the word “terrorism”. Learn them by heart and use in the sentences of your own.
- •III.Translate the following sentences into Ukrainian /Russian:
- •IV. Give antonyms:
- •V. Give English equivalents of the following expressions:
- •VI. Complete the text with the words and word combinations from the box:
- •VII. Translate the following text into English using words and word combinations from the
- •VIII. Read and translate the following text without a dictionary:
- •X. What do these foreign expressions mean?
- •XI. Retell the texts using active vocabulary of the unit.
- •XII. Write an essay or speak on the following topic:
Confines and definition
State terrorism, like terrorism, is a contested term. Acts that accusers may describe as terror, supporters may defend as legitimate defense against supposed threats. State terrorism has been defined as "The use or threat of violence by the state or its agents or supporters, particularly against civilian individuals and populations, as a means of political intimidation and control (i.e. a means of repression)" (Sluke, 2000). However, many contend that states cannot commit acts of terror and/or that acts of terror cannot be committed within the scope of a declared war. The distinction between state and nonstate terror has been criticized as distracting from or justifying offiial terrorism (Chomsky and Herman, 1979). Some, such as Spanish judge Baltasar Garzуn view particular political systems as instances of state terrorism: "State terrorism is a political system whose rule of recognition permits and/or imposes a clandestine, unpredictable, and diffuse application, even regarding clearly innocent people, of coercive means prohibited by the proclaimed judicial ordinance." Some acts of state terrorism also qualify as genocide, democide, crimes against humanity or mass murder.
Methods of state terror
Although state terrorism is an almost universal social phenomenon, instances of state terror usually fall into certain categories. Unfair trial, torture and extrajudicial execution are said to be common practices of state terror, often used to terrorize domestic populations by sovereign or proxy regimes.
Citizens of Western nations are generally protected from unfair trial by constitutional or legislative safeguards and the requirements of due process. Undeveloped nations may have weak institutions and unstable political climates that allow governments to have inappropriate influence over the judiciary, allowing dissenters to be victimized as criminals.
According to Amnesty International (1997), in 1996, out of 150 countries surveyed, 82 had committed torture. Acts of torture are fueled by the lucrative international trade in torture equipment. Many Western companies sell equipment to known human-rights violating regimes.
Extrajudicial execution
Extrajudicial execution, or political murder, is the practice of states or their proxies illegally assassinating citizens because they are viewed as political threats and to intimidate communities. Extrajudicial execution may be carried out by the official military, police forces or unofficial paramilitaries (often called "death squads" or euphemized as "civilian defence"). In the latter case, there may be strong ties between the paramilitaries and official forces, with an overlapping membership and a "blind eye" turned to illegal activities.
Such death squads often unpredictably attack the socially disadvantaged ("undesirables"), religious or ethnic minorities, or citizens deemed to be subversive. Their targets typically include the homeless, street children, union leaders, indigenous peoples, clergy, activists, journalists, and academics. Death squads conveniently shield their sponsors from liability, the illusion of spontaneous criminal violence providing "plausible deniability". Often, the bodies of victims are secretly disposed, typically in mass graves, leaving no evidence of a crime and increasing the trauma to families and communities. These cases are known as "disappearances", particularly in South America. The UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances was formed in 1980 to investigate the global phenomenon of disappearances.