- •I. History of english
- •1.1. Chronological division in the history of english
- •1.2. Development of the national literary english language
- •1.5. Development of subjunctive mood forms from oe to MnE
- •II. Theoretical phonetics
- •2.2. The notion of phonological opposition
- •III. Theory of grammar
- •3.1. General peculiarities of modern english structure
- •3.3. The case problem in modern english
- •Infinitive
- •3.6. Predicative complexes in modern english
- •IV. Lexicology
- •4.1. Etymological survey of the english vocabulary
- •4.2. Regional varieties of the english vocabulary
- •4.6. Ways of word-formation in modern english
- •V. Stylistics
- •5.1. Stylistic stratification of the english vocabulary
- •2. Poetic and Highly literary Words.
- •3. Barbarisms and Foreighnisms.
- •5.2. Expressive means and stylistic devices in MnE
- •5.3. Understanding as a linguostylistic problem
- •VI. Linguistic country study
- •6.1. The system of education in great britain
- •6.2. The state and political structure of great britain
- •VII. Methods of teaching
- •7.2. Listening comprehension (methods of teaching)
- •7.3. Speaking skills (methods of teaching)
- •7.4. Reading skills (methods of teaching)
II. Theoretical phonetics
2.1. THE CONCEPT OF PHONEME, ITS DISTINCTIVE AND REDUNDANT
FEATURES
The outline of the problem discussed
1. Phonetics as a branch of linguistics. Phonetics and phonology.
2. Branches of phonetics.
3. Phonetics and other linguistic disciplines.
4. Application of phonetics.
5. The theory of phoneme:
a) Speech sound and phoneme.
b) Types of allophones.
Linguistics as a science of language consists of several disciplines, each of
which takes only one particular aspect of language or one level of its structure as the
object of its analysis.
The theoretical course of English consists of phonology, lexicology,
morphology, syntax and linguostylistics.
Phonology is the branch of linguistics, which is concerned with the ultimate
units of the expression of language, and in sense analyses the lowest layer of the
structure of language.
27
It is known that language is a means of communication, a means of
transmitting message from one speaker to another.
In linguistic science “language” has a more specific meaning. It denotes the
system of signs, a structure which exists only in its material realization-speech.
Language as a social and abstract phenomenon is contrasted with speech as
individual and concrete.
An utterance, an act of speech is a single concrete manifestation of the system
at work. Language is primarily a means of conveying meanings. But no meaning can
be conveyed without a certain kind of “form”.
A linguistic sign possesses 2-sides – 1) content and 2) form
or
1) meaning and 2) expression
It is bilateral. S o u n d s have no meaning, they are unilateral.
Language and speech are bound by “eme-allo” relations. Every linguistic unit exists
as an “eme” member of the system and the “allo” representative of it in speech. This
principle works for every branch of linguistics – be it phonology, morphology,
syntax, lexicology, stylistics. Thus,
phoneme – allophone
morpheme – allomorph
lexeme – allolex
In other words, differentiation should be made between phonemes (ememembers
of the system) and speech sounds (i.e. the sounds pronounced in actual
human speech, i.e. allo-representatives of phonemes in speech), as well as between
the disciplines studying them – p h o n o l o g y and p h o n e t i c s.
Phonetics studies the sounds of speech, phonology studies phonemes.
Phonology is mainly concerned with the function of sounds is communication
between people. Phonetics studies the sounds of human speech as the material of
which human languages are made. Every natural language is a sound language, as
sound form is indispensable for the existence of languages.
The notion of the “sound of human speech” includes sounds as such, melodies,
stress, rhythm, pause and other prosodic features.
The sound form of language is of double nature: on the one hand, it is a natural
prehomenon and on the other hand it is an ideal social sign.
As a natural phenomenon it is studied by articulatory (physioligical) phonetics,
acoustic (physical) phonetics; the perceptual aspect is studied by psycho-acoustics.
As a linguistic sign it is studied by functional phonetics, or phonology.
Of all the branches of phonetics only functional phonetics (phonology) belongs
to linguistics proper. Others make part of medicine (physiology), psychology and
physics.
The findings of different branches of phonetics have a wide sphere of
application: Phonetics registers the orthoepic norms of speech, it is used in teaching
pronunciation, in compiling alphabets for languages which have no writing systems.
It can be applied in non – linguistic spheres: in defectology whose aim is to
correct children’s wrong articulation; in psychiatrics, where the analysis of intonation
28
has become one of the important diagnostic cues; computer technique is interested in
the synthesis of speech and automatic translation.
Phonetics has branches of its own: The most important of them are: special
phonetics and general phonetics.
The aim of special phonetics is to study the sounds of the language at a
particular period of time, that is synchronically (it is a descriptive phonetics), or
diachronically, that is to study the sounds of the language in its historical
development (historical phonetics). General phonetics studies the sound system of
several languages.
The connection of phonetics with grammar, lexicology and stylistics is
exercised first of all via orthography which in its turn is very closely connected
with phonetics.
Phonetics formulates the rules of pronunciation of separate sounds and sound
combinations. The rules of reading are based on the relation of sounds to orthography
and present certain difficulties in learning the English language.
Through the system of rules of reading phonetics is connected with grammar
and helps to pronounce correctly singular and plural forms and past participles of
English regular verbs (wanted, wished, etc.), “s” phoneme forming plural of nouns.
One of the most important phonetic phenomena – sound interchange – is
another manifestation of the connection of phonetics with grammar. For instance, this
connection can be observed in the category of number. Thus, the interchange of [f –
v], [s – z], [ø – ð] helps to differentiate singular and plural forms of such nouns as
‘leaf – leaves’, ‘bath – baths’, ‘house – houses’, etc.
Vowel interchange helps to distinguish the singular and the plural of such
words as ‘basis – basesz’, ‘crisis – crisesz’, ‘analysis – analysesz’, ‘woman – women’,
etc. Besides, vowel interchange is connected with the tense forms of irregular verbs
(sing – sang – sung).
Phonetics is also connected with grammar through its intonation component.
Sometimes intonation alone can serve to single out the logical predicate of the
sentence (He came home). In affirmative sentences the rising nuclear may serve to
show interrogation: …/home. Pausation may also serve to perform differentiating
function.
Phonetics is also connected with lexicology. It is only due to the presence of
stress or accent in the right place that we distinguish certain nouns from verbs:
“ґabstract (реферат) – to abґstract (извлекать)”
“ґobject – to obґject”. Due to the position of word accent we can distinguish
between homonymous words and word groups,
e.g. ґblackbird – ґblack ґbird
Phonetics is also connected with stylistics first of all through intonation and its
components, which serve to express emotions. Very often the writer helps the reader
to interpret his ideas through special words and remarks, such as: “a pause”, “a short
pause”, “angrily, hopefully, gently”, etc.
The theory of phoneme.
A speech sound and a phoneme. The speech sounds of a language, which
substitute all of its morphemes and words, are instances, manifestations, or
29
realizations of its segmental phonemes. The number of sounds in speech is unlimited.
There are no two absolutely identical sounds. Still we speak of a definite number of
vowels or consonants for a given language. What we are thinking about is not
concrete sounds; it’s phonemes – abstracted ideal concepts of actual sounds, models
which enable us to identify the limitless variety of speech sounds however different
in the pronunciation of various speakers as a quite definite set.
But it is not always simple and easy to establish the phonemic status of certain
speech sounds, i.e. to decide to which phonemes they should be assigned or, in other
words, variants (allophones) of which phonemes they are. For instance, what is the
phonemic status of the neutral vowel sound [q] in RP? Has RP a neutral vowel
phoneme whose variants, or allophones, are constituted by different varieties of the
neutral vowel sound? Or are these varieties of the neutral vowel sound allophones of
some other phoneme or phonemes? If so, of which one or which ones? By answering
such questions about each speech sound of the language its phonemes are identified,
the inventory of its phonemes is drawn up, phoneme system is established.
It should be pointed out, however, that speech sounds which occur in
interjections and words borrowed from other languages, but do not occur in other
words of the language, do not form part of its phonemic system, i.e. they are not
instances, or realizations, of any of its phonemes, e.g. ejective plosives pronounced in
the English interjection spelt “tut, tut” or nasalized vowels pronounced in some words
borrowed from French, such as genre. Such sounds may form a phonemic subsystem.
The identification of the phonemes of a language is not the only problem of its
phonological analysis. Closely connected with this problem is the problem of
establishing the phonemic composition of those of its words which contain one or
more sounds whose phonemic status is uncertain, the problem of deciding to which
phonemes “suspicious” sounds in such words should be assigned.
Suppose, we have proved by finding such minimal pairs as [q'ksept] (accept) –
[І'ksept] (except), ['Ofisqz] (officers) – ['Ofisiz] (offices) and many others that RP has
a neutral vowel phoneme [q] and that the different varieties of the neutral vowel
sound are allophones of this phoneme.
This does not mean, however, that all linguists admitting the existence of the
neutral vowel phoneme in RP will at the same time agree that the neutral vowel
sounds in all the words in which they occur in RP are allophones of RP neutral vowel
phoneme.
For instance, while agreeing that the neutral vowel sounds in [q'ksept] (accept)
and ['Ofisqz] (officers) are allophones of the neutral vowel phoneme [q], it may be
argued, however, that the same neutral vowel sound in [qk'tiviti] (activity) is an
allophone of the phoneme [x] which occurs under stress in the same morpheme in
the word ['xktiv] (active) rather than a variant of the neutral phoneme.
The solution of these two problems, especially of the first one, is the main aim
of a phonological analysis of a language.
Linguists have not yet arrived at a definition of a phoneme acceptable to all.
The most widely-accepted (used) understanding of a phoneme is that the segmental
phoneme is the smallest (i.e. further indivisible into smaller consecutive segments)
30
language unit (sound type) that exists in the speech of all the members of a given
language community as such speech sounds which are capable of distinguishing one
word from another word of the same language. Phoneme is a unit of language, and a
concrete speech sound is a unit of speech; phoneme is a member of the system and its
material representative is its allophone. In other words, the actual speech sounds
pronounced by the speaker or reader are variants, or allophones, of a phoneme.
Speech sounds which have one or more articulatory, and therefore acoustic features
in common and at the same time differ from each other in some degree are said to
belong to one and the same phoneme, i.e. are variants of one and the same phoneme.
For example, in the words [eit] (eight) and [eitT] (eighth) the [t] consonants are
similar, but at the same time they are slightly different: [t] in [eit] 8 is pronounced
with the tongue pressed against the alveoli and is therefore an alveoli consonant,
whereas the [t] in [eitT] is pronounced with the blade of the tongue pressed against
the upper teeth and is therefore a dental consonant. Yet, if these two different [t]
sounds were interchanged, each of these words would still be recognized and
understood as such. In fact, it often happens that in certain positions a final alveolar
consonant is replaced by its dental counterpart in one and the same word. For
example, the final consonant of the above-mentioned word “eight” is dental when it
is immediately followed by the dental consonant [T] or [D] as in “eight thick books”
or “eight then”, whereas it is alveolar in other positions, e.g. “eight apples”.
Among the variants of one and the same phoneme there is always one that
preserves all the articulatory-acoustic features of the phoneme, which are listed in the
phonetic definition given in the classification. It is usually the sound which would be
pronounced by a native speaker of the language if he is asked to say the sound in
isolation. This sound is called the principal variant of the phoneme. All the other
variants of the same phoneme are called its subsidiary variants.
With the exception of free variants all the other variants of one and the same
phoneme are mutually exclusive, i.e. no variants can normally occur in the position in
which any other variant occurs; they are in complementary distribution (examples
with “eight” and “eighth”).
Phoneme has the following properties:
1. It is an ultimate unit of language (syntagmatically);
2. It is of a generalized, even abstract nature
3. It is psychologically real for any speaker of a given language;
4. It is capable of differentiating meaningful units (morphemes, words);
5. It is not conditioned by position.
The functions of the phoneme are the constitutive/recognitive and distinctive.
As we have just stated, allophones are realizations of some phoneme(s) in
speech. They depend on the position. By position is meant the immediate phonetic
environment, i.e. the preceding and the following neighbouring sound. For vowels the
stressed and unstressed position is also relevant.
The influence of sounds upon each other is called coarticulation. Coarticulation
is the basic fact of speech.
Examples of different allophones are as follows:
[k] – phoneme
31
car – [kh] – aspirated allophone
cat – [kґ] – palatalized allophone
could – [k.] – labialized allophone
baker – [k] – weakly aspirated allophone
talked – [k] – unaspirated, explosionless
tickle – [k] – laterally exploded allophone
Taking the phoneme [t], the following examples of allophones can be provided:
In the word “twice” [t] is rounded because as soon as the tip of the tongue
touches the teethridge, the lips move forward to form a round narrowing for the [w]
sound which follows it. In the word “teeth” [t] is pronounced with spread lips under
the influence of [i:]. In the word “try” [t] is post-alveolar under the influence of the
[r] phoneme which follows it.
Another example can be provided with the sound type [i:]. In the word “bee”
[i:] is the longest, in “bead” [i:] becomes shorter under the influence of the voiced [d],
in the word “beat” [i:] is the shortest because it is followed by the voiceless
consonant [t].
Vowel phonemes undergo changes not only in quantity, but also in quality, as,
for example, in the word “beak” where [i:] is more back than in the word “bee”. It
happens because of the influence of the [k] phoneme which follows [i:] in the word
“beak”.
Allophone, which is the least dependent on the position, is called the basic allophone.
It is the closest to our concept of phoneme. As a phoneme, strictly speaking, cannot
be pronounced; what we actually say introducing, for instance “phoneme [k]”, is its
basic allophone. Basic allophones are important for teaching.
For a language user allophones of one and the same phoneme seem very close
articulatorily, or even identical. The reason here is not the objective articulatory
similarity, but one’s phonological habits. What seems “same” for speakers of one
language may sound “different” for speakers of another. Thus, [l] & [l’], hard and
soft consonants, are different for the speakers of Russian, as well as the words “угол”
& “уголь” while for an English or German speaker they sound “the same”. On the
other hand, where the English speaker would see an obvious difference, ([r] & [l]), a
Japanese speaker registers one sound. Since every phoneme has several variants, the
need arises for their classification.
First, allophones are divided into 1) principal, or typical, and 2) subsidiary
ones.
The principal or typical allophone (variant of a phoneme) 1) is free from the
influence of neighbouring speech sounds and purely phonetic factors, such e.g., as,
the absence of stress; 2) it is most representative of the phoneme as a whole, in the
sense that it has the greatest number of articulatory features (both distinctively
relevant and irrelevant, among all the variants of the phoneme). For instance, the
English phoneme [t] has 3 articulatory features, which are always present in all its
allophones and thus constitute its invariant. These features are expressed in the
following articulatory terms: 1) forelingual, 2) occlusive, and 3) voiceless. The
plosionless, nasally & laterally exploded variants of the [t] phoneme, as in “nightcap,
32
night-light, nightmare, night-nurse”, have only these 3 features, which auditorily, are
just silence and, acoustically, absence of energy. But in spite of the fact that these
allophones of the [t] phoneme are the very embodiment of its invariant, it is hardly
possible to consider any of them to be its principal or typical allophone. They are not
free from the influence of the neighbouring sounds.
The subsidiary variants of a phoneme are subdivided into two groups:
1) combinatory & 2) positional.
Combinatory allophones are those which are clearly due to the influence of the
neighbouring speech sounds (assimilation and adaptation, or accommodation) and to
the specific way in which adjacent sounds are joined together, e.g. dental variants of
the English forelingual phonemes [t,d,n,l] which are due to the assimilating influence
of the following dental consonants [и], [D], as in [eitи] (eights), [L:lґDqu] (although),
etc., [the labialized variants of the consonant phonemes which are due to the
accommodating influence of a following rounded vowel, as in [tu:] (two), etc.]; the
plosionless variants of the occlusive (contoid) phonemes [p, b, t, d, k, g,] which are
due to the specific English way in which they are joined to the same phonemes or
affricates that follow them, as in [ґblækbLd] (blackboard), [ґblæk ґtЃзеq] (black chair),
etc.
Positional allophones are those which are used in definite positions
traditionally, according to the orthoepic norms of the language, rather than because of
the clearly observable influence of neighbouring sounds. A good example of a
positional allophone is provided by the clear variant of the English phoneme [l]
(field, feel – dark variant).
