Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Rusagro_Change_of_TP_181121_watermark.pdf
Скачиваний:
11
Добавлен:
06.09.2019
Размер:
638.43 Кб
Скачать

vk.com/id446425943

Rusagro

Russia

Consumer: Consumer Products

 

Financial forecasts: Path to mid-cycle EBITDA

Figure 22: Sugar sales

1,000

 

800

 

 

 

 

 

tonnes

 

 

 

 

218

184

600

627

57

108

 

 

 

 

 

 

000

400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

567

540

535

600

 

299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

 

 

Beet

The pork division brings most of the organic growth in our model, with 1.8x higher breeding capacities upon the launch of the Tambov and Russian Far East projects.

Larger meat segment and recovering prices return a 10% top line CAGR over the next five years. Revenues are evenly balanced between sugar, meat and farming.

The consolidated EBITDA margin was pressured last year and reported at 18%. Our mid-cycle assumption of 24% implies EBITDA doubling by 2022F.

Capex peaks at RUB 21bn in 2018F and the heavy period ends next year (RUB 17bn). We factor full deleveraging in three years and a blended dividend yield of 8%.

The organic growth for Rusagro primarily stems from the breeding division. In 201922F, we factor the Tambov, Russian Far East, and the consolidation of Capitalagro to increase pork capacities 1.8x to 360,000 tonnes in live weight and make Rusagro the second largest pork producer in Russia. We factor only the first stage of the Russian Far East project that primarily targets domestic regions. Were Rusagro to find a strategic partner for the project that could support export operations to Asian countries, the facility could see a multiple expansion, implying upside risks to our model.

The Oil & Fats business was the smallest in Rusagro’s portfolio, and the company had been considering either disposing of its existing assets or a sizable acquisition. In early October, Rusagro announced the intention to acquire the second largest crusher in Russia, Solnechnye Producty. The target controls 1.4mnt of extraction capacity, 500,000t of fats products, 650,000t of silos, and 150,000ha of farming land. The deal could provide Rusagro with a 20% market share and make the segment comparable in size to sugar, meat and farming. We note that the deal is mostly to be structured through servicing the target’s debt, but that as the terms have not finalised or the details announced, we are not including it in our model.

Our sugar volumes are flattish from current levels over the forecast period as recently acquired plants are mostly integrated and optimised while efficiency projects in molasses are on stream. Our land bank increases from 700,000ha at present to 800,000ha by 2022F to reflect the aim to produce more soft commodities in the Russian Far East and be more vertically integrated into sugar beet (50% selfsufficiency vs. targeted 65%).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 23: Breeding capacities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

375

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

345

360

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

295

60

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tonnes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

270

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

866

900

900

919

936

945

950

225

 

 

 

 

 

181

198

198

207

205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

185

195

195

195

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

 

137

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

115

115

122

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90

90

90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64

66

76

81

83

83

85

85

85

2016

2017

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

 

-

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

 

 

 

Cane

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Belgorod

 

Tambov

 

Far East

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

21 November 2018

12

vk.com/id446425943

Rusagro

Russia

Consumer: Consumer Products

 

The launch of the new marketing year across various soft commodities brought a 2030% uplift in prices, as global prices bounced from the ten-year bottom, domestic supply-demand balances see lower harvest for grain (down 20% YoY) and beet (down 15% YoY), and USDRUB is weaker. Factoring those for 2018-19F, we see rouble prices growing with blended CPI of 4% over the further forecast period and arriving at a 2018-22F top line CAGR of 10%. The contribution of the pork segment increases from 25% in 2018F to 35% at the expense of sugar (37% vs. 32%) and oil and fats (23% vs. 18%) divisions.

Figure 24: Sugar and meat prices

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107

111

115

 

 

 

 

96

99

 

95

95

100

103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

 

 

39

85

78

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37

76

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/ kg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36

 

/ kg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RUB

 

 

65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RUB

30

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55

27

 

 

 

 

31

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

25

 

 

 

 

 

Sugar price (lhs)

 

Pork price (rhs)

 

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

Figure 25: Revenue forecast

140

127

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bn

80

 

 

 

84

79

84

 

 

 

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RUB

60

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

 

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

In 2017, Rusagro saw a 23% YoY decline in EBITDA to RUB 14bn as the oversupplied sugar market brought a dilution in refining profitability and made beet growing loss making. In addition, the oil and fats market was going through a period of aggressive promotional activities and experienced an unfavourable procurement campaign.

The recovery in prices over the last three months and improving operations across segments mean that we factor an improvement in the EBITDA margin from 18% last year to 21% in 2018 and 23% next year. The latter is reaching our mid-cycle profitability level and corresponds to the average results in 2013-17. Coupled with the aforementioned capacity build-up, the profitability brings EBITDA 1.8x higher by the end of the forecast period at RUB 31bn.

Figure 26: Rusagro EBITDA forecast

 

 

 

 

Figure 27: Operational segments’ EBITDA margin

 

40

 

 

 

34%

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.0

37%

55%

 

50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

47%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31%

 

 

 

 

 

 

29.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.8

 

 

 

41%

 

42%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27%

 

 

34%

 

 

34%

34%

34%

34%

34%

 

 

 

24.4

 

 

 

23.2 24% 24% 24%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22%

 

 

 

 

 

29%

31%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21%

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

28%

 

 

 

 

 

 

26%

26%

bn

 

 

 

 

 

 

23%

 

8.4

 

27%

 

 

 

 

 

 

25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

18%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26%

 

22%

23%

 

 

19% 18.1

 

18.2

17.5

7.5

 

 

 

21%

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

6.6

 

 

 

17%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RUB

 

 

 

6.2

13.7 14.8

 

23%

13%

 

22%

 

19%

 

23%

24%

24%

 

 

 

4.4

7.7

6.2

 

4.2

 

 

 

13%

11%

10%

 

18%

12%

11%

11%

11%

11%

 

13%

 

 

14.0

10.0

11.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

8.8

 

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

 

7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.8

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

 

-1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.2

2.9

11.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.9

2.4

 

9.6

 

 

 

 

9.2 9.6

 

 

 

 

 

-2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.8

5.5

6.7

8.2

8.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.3

2.1

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- 1.4

2.1

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-3%

-15%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Sugar Meat Agriculture

2017

2018F

2019F

Oil and Fat

2020F

2021F

2022F

EBITDA margin

2013

2014

2015

2016

Sugar Meat

2017

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

Agriculture

Oil and Fat

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

21 November 2018

13

vk.com/id446425943

Rusagro

Russia

Consumer: Consumer Products

 

Rusagro is going through an aggressive investment period and we factor record high capital expenditures of RUB 21bn in 2018F. The meat division represents 60% of this figure, with prime spending on greenfield projects in Central Russia and the Russian Far East. For 2019F, we factor a deceleration to RUB 17bn and the completion of the capex-heavy cycle. From 2020F, our capex is matched with maintenance needs, i.e. RUB 8.5bn annually.

The disappointing start to the year and high capex needs return negative free cash flow generation of RUB 8bn in 2018F. Next year, our base case assumes slightly positive FCF, while the completion of the investment cycle is behind our terminal FCF yield of 25%. Net debt is to reach a record high RUB 16bn by YE18F, with a net debt / EBITDA ratio of 0.9x. Thereafter, our model assumes complete deleveraging in three years. We factor a blended 50% payout ratio from IFRS net income over the forecast period and arrive at an average dividend yield of 8%.

Figure 28: Rusagro cash flow management

Figure 29: Free cash flow and dividend yields

RUB bn

34

 

2.0x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30.6

32.6

2.1x

30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

24%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.7

15.9

 

17.7

0.9x

19.0

 

 

 

 

20%

 

 

19%

 

 

15

 

 

 

0.5x

13.0

 

 

 

 

0.7x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.6x

11.8

0.8x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.8

0.1x

 

0.2x

 

 

 

 

0.3x

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

 

13%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.2x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6%

 

10%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9%

 

(5)

(4.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.7x

 

4%

 

(5.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-0.6x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11.4)

 

 

 

 

 

(8.5)

(8.5)

(8.5)

 

 

 

2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16.6)

(16.7)

 

(17.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21.0)

 

 

 

 

-2.1x

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-10%

-9%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating CF

 

Capex

Net debt / EBITDA

 

 

2018F

2019F

2020F

2021F

2022F

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend yield

Free cash flow yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

 

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research

21 November 2018

14

vk.com/id446425943

Rusagro

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Russia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer: Consumer Products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 30: Comparative valuation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company

Region

Price

Mcap

EV

—EV/EBITDA, x—

—P/E, x—

 

 

 

USD

USD mn

USD mn

2018F

2019F

2018F

2019F

 

Russia/CIS Median

 

 

 

 

6.3

4.8

8.5

6.3

 

Rusagro*

RUSSIA

10.58

1,423

1,686

6.3

4.8

8.5

6.3

 

MHP

UKRAINE

10.55

1,127

2,312

4.8

4.2

5.6

4.5

 

KERNEL

UKRAINE

52.00

1,127

1,716

6.9

5.1

17.8

7.3

 

Developed markets

 

 

 

 

7.7

7.5

13.1

14.2

 

GRAIN PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

9.0

8.3

18.1

14.2

 

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO

UNITED STATES

46.31

25,963

32,313

9.0

8.3

13.0

12.6

 

BUNGE LTD

UNITED STATES

58.41

8,241

15,800

7.0

6.5

12.2

10.8

 

KWS SAAT SE

GERMANY

329.42

2,174

2,178

11.0

10.6

19.4

19.4

 

GRAINCORP LTD-A

AUSTRALIA

5.48

1,254

1,927

9.5

10.8

28.0

77.4

 

ANDERSONS INC/THE

UNITED STATES

32.60

923

1,522

7.6

6.9

18.1

14.2

 

VEG. OIL PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

7.0

6.5

14.0

12.5

 

BUNGE LTD

UNITED STATES

58.41

8,241

15,155

6.7

6.1

12.2

10.8

 

SIPEF NV

BELGIUM

57.86

612

681

7.3

6.8

15.8

14.2

 

SUGAR PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

8.5

8.1

13.2

13.9

 

TATE & LYLE PLC

BRITAIN

8.78

4,104

4,491

7.9

8.1

13.3

13.4

 

AGRANA BETEILIGUNGS AG

AUSTRIA

20.05

1,253

1,623

4.8

6.9

7.6

14.1

 

GREENCORE GROUP PLC

IRELAND

2.46

1,743

2,482

9.1

8.1

13.1

13.6

 

ASSOCIATED BRITISH FOODS PLC

BRITAIN

31.90

25,251

24,559

9.8

9.4

18.9

18.3

 

MEAT PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

7.0

5.9

11.9

15.7

 

WH GROUP LTD

HONG KONG

0.83

12,179

15,503

6.5

5.9

11.2

10.2

 

HORMEL FOODS CORP

UNITED STATES

45.36

24,182

23,992

17.9

16.7

23.9

24.3

 

HKSCAN OYJ-A SHS

FINLAND

2.07

114

486

27.5

4.7

neg

36.6

 

NH FOODS LTD

JAPAN

37.13

3,992

4,631

7.0

8.1

12.0

15.7

 

ATRIA OYJ

FINLAND

9.45

267

579

5.8

5.2

11.9

9.4

 

Emerging markets

 

 

 

 

8.2

7.7

16.9

13.8

 

GRAIN PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

8.2

8.3

12.6

14.7

 

CHINA AGRI-INDUSTRIES HLDGS

HONG KONG

0.37

1,927

3,662

8.2

7.9

9.1

8.4

 

HEILONGJIANG AGRICULTURE-A

CHINA

1.31

2,328

2,031

12.5

12.1

17.4

16.3

 

SLC AGRICOLA SA

BRAZIL

13.57

1,294

1,652

8.2

8.3

12.6

14.7

 

VEG. OIL PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

9.1

8.3

21.1

16.5

 

IOI CORP BHD

MALAYSIA

1.03

6,315

7,636

13.0

17.6

21.4

26.7

 

KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BHD

MALAYSIA

5.95

6,333

7,226

15.1

14.8

27.5

26.5

 

GOLDEN AGRI-RESOURCES LTD

SINGAPORE

0.17

2,183

5,056

9.1

7.5

n/m

16.5

 

CHINA AGRI-INDUSTRIES HLDGS

HONG KONG

0.37

1,927

3,662

8.2

7.9

9.1

8.4

 

IJM PLANTATIONS BHD

MALAYSIA

0.44

389

524

10.1

10.6

22.6

27.4

 

SLC AGRICOLA SA

BRAZIL

13.57

1,294

1,652

8.2

8.3

12.6

14.7

 

SARAWAK OIL PALMS BERHAD

MALAYSIA

0.61

349

527

5.7

4.5

11.9

8.4

 

TSH RESOURCES BHD

MALAYSIA

0.25

340

679

13.3

11.7

20.9

16.9

 

TH PLANTATIONS BHD

MALAYSIA

0.14

125

515

8.3

7.3

26.3

15.2

 

MEAT PRODUCERS

 

 

 

 

5.6

4.5

14.0

8.1

 

INDUSTRIAS BACHOCO-SER B

MEXICO

3.40

2,042

1,384

5.3

4.4

11.2

10.9

 

ASTRAL FOODS LTD

SOUTH AFRICA

13.23

567

513

2.9

3.7

5.3

6.6

 

JBS SA

BRAZIL

2.88

7,865

20,786

5.2

4.8

18.7

7.3

 

GFPT PUBLIC CO LTD

THAILAND

0.45

560

641

9.0

7.6

16.9

12.9

 

MARFRIG GLOBAL FOODS SA

BRAZIL

1.65

1,028

4,946

5.9

4.3

n/m

8.9

 

MINERVA SA

BRAZIL

1.55

351

2,146

5.9

4.6

n/m

5.0

 

Developed markets

 

 

 

 

7.7

7.5

13.1

14.2

 

Grain producers

 

 

 

 

9.0

8.3

18.1

14.2

 

Vegetable oil producers

 

 

 

 

7.0

6.5

14.0

12.5

 

Sugar producers

 

 

 

 

8.5

8.1

13.2

13.9

 

Meat producers

 

 

 

 

7.0

5.9

11.9

15.7

Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research (marked with an ‘*’); Bloomberg as of 19 November 2018 (all the rest)

21 November 2018

15