Is we can remove the diodes and simplify it even further (fig. 4)? The question is – will the

load kill the resonance or should we go back to switching? The resonance will not usually

start with load on it, but the load can be applied carefully later.

Further ou (higher efficiency) research and development potential

Quote: The RV having quite a lot of public and private replications with average 98% success looping will become also a normal event when certain ALREADY PUBLIC and well disclosed parameters are met as units are MODIFIED to work as described and the DESIGN OPTIMIZED.

The revelations on how to mitigate loss, conserve energy lead to ENERGY transform and teach expertise required to create OU conditions and the method to manage the power needed to sustain such transformations and divert the excess to whatever intended use.

IN RV generator side the VAR energy generated can indeed be rectified using bridge or plug vectoring, AC vector can be integrated across capacitor to be leading within the input of system correcting power factor to a Over Unity level as a DC vector can charge or contribute to lower the battery amperage in an inverter powered system.

All is needed is an LC & some diodes (Nothing more ) in whatever mode put in whatever complex combination computer driven electronics, parallel series Inductive capacitive networks, the fact is that it becomes OU by a logarithmic gain encountered as a magnetic energy component and is converted to a charge in a capacitor under a resonance state.

The RV’s ability to save power in the prime mover case comes in fact from a receding time variable, from the STATOR rotating field. View the rotor is a receding resistive force were the power used is measured in pressure and as an angle of rotation variable in this field (inductance reluctance). Like is physics initial acceleration from a mass at rest until it equals the force moving it. Once is equal the only energy used is the one raised by entropy losses. Extracting OU requires all this basics to be digested in models, else theory standard deviates mind toward entropy again. It’s the Method what matters.

The RV second motor (generator) can be set to semi-resonate at a reasonably HI virtual power. In contrast to the PM (prime mover) which is an example of a parallel resonance tuned to a PF=1 under load, the generator exemplifies a series resonance and will have max current & minimal impedance when a cross phase cap is adjusted towards resonance.

Special switching circuits can be designed to collect the resonance effectively. The fallacy such REACTIVE power is useless falls off as this power is vectored to a CAPACITOR as a PURE DC potential. There if anyone can read power factor is non existent and the potential is in volts farads (mF) charge and can be measured discharged into a load as JOULES. All this is under the same understanding as per BOOK written electrical laws.

Resonance is understood by the inventor to be radiant energy flow behaving like RF (radio frequency). The principle understanding is that when the circuit is in resonance and is tuned to the right impedance in an RLC circuit a standing wave is created (reflected third wave) and can be of higher or lower frequency which traps and transforms other type of energy by stochastic resonance from the thermal back round ambient noise (ZPE).

The invertors also parallels the rotary equations principles mentioned by prof. S, Seike, in his book Principles of Ultra Relativity, 5th ed. 1978, G. Research Lab. Uwajimah, Hagelberg, P. Physics. Where Seike’s Rotary formula Transformation is disclosed and considers that the RV is seike’s in Vitro (lab tested justification) rotary formula is confirmation.

Hector questions why nobody applied it to motors if it was so dammed easy.

Cos0 =I/V=P P=VIcos0 cos0=P (Compare RV readings to his)

RV is well justified in SEIKE rotary formulations , and is the theoretical complement to RV , Even that Seike failed to apply such formulas to rotary machines RV well demonstrates his Formulations are a physical reality. Theoretically quoted by the inventor-Formula is measured by Power in + AF (amplification Factor) - Time entropic system decay -loop power requirement = OU.

The first true explanatory Laboratory corroboration of OU referred too was stochastic resonance were such FORMULATION (basic) applies. My Justifications from electron spin gain to magnetic latching under resonant and semi resonant states are a true OU Scientific Justification and takes OVERUNITY from pseudoscience to TRUE science lab tested truth.

In pure RF as per my OLD formulations Virtual Power Equals true power if multiplied by .8. A TRUE figure is (.618 x VP) wherever RF power is Transferred properly to a co phased VA. Only a few can do it.

The problem is RADIANT ENERGY differs a LOT from STANDARD POWER as Most experimenters have found a SHORTED circuit uses less energy than OPENING it to a resistive load ( in standard power that is a mayor contradiction) but in RF practice that is a normal artifact in Q tuning and LC characteristics of operation. A higher resistance can increase power requirement in a circuit and a lower resistance can reduce power requirement.

On the Tech issues Time, Length, magnitude of a pulse determines many things, The lab and Imaginative aspect are essential (Specially Things on HOW a shorted Wire can be An Infinite farad Capacitor) (becomes solid conductor) as a Coil is Exited under 0 volts to Maximal Current, coil Charges (electron Saturates) in the current node of a virtual standing wave (theoretically infinite).

Further hector states ANY AC generator can be taken to RADIANT energy states this is a reverse induction alternator the readings of such unit were 12 to 1 radiant energy output versus input.