- •1. The Old Germanic Ls, their classification and principal features.
- •3. The chronological division of the history of English.
- •6. Oe dialects. The role of the Wessex dialect.
- •8. Major spelling changes in me, their causes.
- •4. The Scandinavian invasion and its effect on English.
- •9,10,11. The oe vowel system (monophthongs and diphthongs). Major changes.
- •12. Consonant changes in me and ne (growth of affricates, loss of certain consonants).
- •5. The Norman Conquest and its effect on the history of English.
- •14. The oe noun system (grammatical categories, major types of declension).
- •15,The changes of the noun grammatical categories in me and their causes.
- •16. The oe personal pronouns, their grammatical categories and declension. Lexical replacement in me.
- •17. The development of the adjective in me (decay of grammatical categories and declensions).
- •18. The oe demonstrative pronouns, their grammatical categories and declension. The rise of the articles.
- •21. Oe strong verbs and their further development.
- •22. Oe preterit-present verbs and their further development.
- •24. The rise of analytical forms in verbal system in me.
- •20. Oe weak verbs and their further development.
- •19. The oe verb (grammatical categories, morphological types).
- •31. Borrowings from classical Ls in me.
- •29. Oe vocabulary, its volume and etymological structure.
- •28. Types of syntactic relations in oe.
- •26. Causes of changes in English morphology.
- •2. The common features of germanic languages
- •25 Verbals in the history of English
- •27.Oe syntax
- •30.Word Order
26. Causes of changes in English morphology.
Because of the loss of final m n, and the weakening of unstressed a o u e to [], many OE inflections became indistinguishable in early ME and dropped in late ME. The frequency of subject and object NP forms established the nominative/accusative plural form (and the -es inflection for nouns in general) throughout the plural, and the nominative/accusative singular (sometimes with analogical -e from the dative) throughout the singular—except that the genitive in -s was maintained. Thus the ME paradigm for a noun like fox came to be essentially what it is in NE: sg. fox, possessive foxes (now fox's), and plural foxes.
In other paradigms, the reduction of inflectional distinctions was even greater. The dor class was reduced to three forms (deer, deeres, deere), while lr was reduced to two (loor, loore); these distinctions were further leveled when final inflected -e vanished, by about 1500. Adjectival inflections were greatly simplified at the beginning of ME, and completely lost by the end.
ME has more or less the same verb inflections as NE, except that the 3sg. present tense ends in -(e)th (lyketh, hath), and plural present tense in -n or -en (apparently borrowed from the OE subjunctive): gon, eten, bryngen. The reduction of the verbal inflectional system brought about a marked increase of periphrastic constructions in the future and perfect; modals replaced the OE subjunctive. Thus the establishment of an auxiliary system, including perfective have and be, is in large part compensation for inflectional reductions. The historical present is a late development of ME.
2. The common features of germanic languages
Old German languages show differences in comparison with other European Lang on 3 main linguistic levels: grammatical, phonetic and lexical.
IN PHONETICS:
accent (word stress) in IE was characterized by free and musical accent (fixed & unfixed) ; in PG accent became fixed on the root syllable and dynamic, strong (силовое); characteristics of musical accent disappeared in Gmc languages
Indo-European (Non-Germanic) |
Proto-Germanic | |
1. free stress (movable, i.e. can appear in any part of a word (root, prefix, suffix)); |
1. fixed stress (can’t move either in form- or word-building and is usually placed on root or prefix); | |
2. pitch stress (musical) |
2. dynamic stress (force, breath stress) | |
E.g.: русский |
E.g.: German |
English |
б`елый |
`Liebe |
`white |
белизн`а |
`lieben |
`whiteness |
белов`атый |
`lieberhaft |
`whitish |
бел`ить |
ge`liebt |
`whitewash |
The Proto-Germanic type of stress led to the formation of the following peculiarities of the Germanic languages as compared to non-Germanic Indo-European languages:
phonetic – as a result of the fixed position of the stress the unstressed syllables were becoming weaker and weaker, they got less distinct and neutral sounds (such as “schwa”) appeared;
morphological – as a result of the fact that the stress was fixed on the root and the syllables following the root were always unstressed and weak, many Germanic languages began to lose suffixes and grammatical endings (all the vocalic endings) and became ANALYTICAL LANGUAGES.
Grimm’s and Verner’s laws.
Grimm’s law: The first Germanic consonant shifts took place in the V-II cent. BC. Jacobs Grimm’s Law in 1822. According to Grimm, he classified consonant correspondences between indoeuropean and germanic stops (plosives).
There are 3 acts of this law:
IE voiceless plosives p, t, k correspond to Gmc voiceless fricatives f, Ө, h. Eg: пламя – flame, три – three, кардио – heart.
IE voiced plosives b, d, g, →Gmc voiceless fricatives p, t, k. Eg: болото - pool, kardia – heart, ego – ic (ik).
IE aspirated voiced plosives bh, dh, gh →to voiced plosives without aspiration b d g. Eg: bhrāta – brother, rudhira – red, ghostis – guest.
The second consonant shift was Carl Verner’s law (only in Old High German). According C.Verner all the common Gmc consonants became voiced in intervocalic position if the preceding vowel was unstressed (a change takes place in the course of time).
p-f > v septem
t-Ө > đ, d сто – hund (OE)
k-x > j, g
s-s > z/r auris – ēare
Consonant Correspondences |
Latin |
OE |
ModE | |||||
1. [p, t, k] voiceless stops/plosives |
[f, , h] voiceless fricatives |
[v, ð/d, g] voiced fricatives |
septem |
seofen |
seven | |||
pater |
fæđer |
father | ||||||
socrus |
swaiho(Gothic) |
Schwager(Germ) | ||||||
2. Rhotacism |
ausis (Lithuanian) |
Auso (Gothic) |
ear, Ohr (Germ) | |||||
[s] |
[z] |
[r] |
Devoicing took place in early common Gmc when the stress was not yet fixed on the root.
A variety of Verner’s law is rhotacism (greek letter rho). [s] →[z]→[r] we find traces of this phenomenon in form of the verb to be →was – were, is – are; ist – sind – war.
II consonant shift occurd in dialects of sothern Gmc. Eg: еда – eat – essen, вода – water – wasser, hope – hoffen, bed – bett.
Ch (G) → C (OE) : reich – ricostan.
Palatal Mutation/i-Umlaut
Mutation – a change of one vowel to another one under the influence of a vowel in the following syllable.
Palatal mutation (or i-Umlaut) happened in the 6th -7th c. and was shared by all Old Germanic Languages, except Gothic. I-mutation is a change of root back vowels to front ones or root open vowels to closer ones under the influence of i/j in the next syllable.
Palatal mutation – fronting and raising of vowels under the influence of [i] and [j] in the following syllable (to approach the articulation of these two sounds). As a result of palatal mutation:
[i] and [j] disappeared in the following syllable sometimes leading to the doubling of a consonant in this syllable;
new vowels appeared in OE ([ie, y]) as a result of merging and splitting:
before palatal mutation |
after palatal mutation |
Gothic |
OE |
a o æ |
e |
badi |
bedd (bed) |
a: |
æ: |
dails |
dælan (deal) |
ŏ/ō |
ĕ/ē |
mōtjan |
mētan (meet) |
ŭ/ū |
ŷ/ỹ (labialised) (new!) |
fulljan |
fyllan (fill) |
ĕă/ēā ĕŏ/ēō |
ĭě/īē (new!) |
eald (early OE) |
ieldra (late OE) |
Traces of i-Umlaut in Modern English:
irregular Plural of nouns (man – men; tooth – teeth);
irregular verbs and adjectives (told ←tell; sold ←sell; old – elder);
word-formation with sound interchange (long – length; blood – bleed).
IN GRAMMAR:
A synthetic grammatical system (relationships between the parts of the sentence were shown by the forms of the words rather than by their position or by auxiliary words). In the early periods of history the grammatical forms were built by means of: sound interchanges, inflections and suppletion.
Suppletion (inherited from Indo-European) – the usage of 2 or more different roots as forms of one and the same word:
Part of Speech |
Indo-European Non-Germanic Languages |
Germanic Languages | |||
Italian |
русский |
English |
German | ||
Personal Pronouns |
io, mio, mi/me |
я, меня, мне |
I, my, mine, me |
ich, mich, mir | |
Adjectives |
buono, migliore, ottimo |
хороший, лучше, лучший |
good, better, best |
gut, besser, bester | |
Some Verbs |
essere, sono, e`, ero, saro`, etc. |
есть, был, будет |
be, is, are, am, was, were |
sein, bin, ist, sind, war, gewesen, etc. |
Inflections (inherited from Indo-European) – though in the Germanic languages inflections were simpler and shorter than in other Indo-European languages.
Let’s take the system of declensions as an example. In PG it was well-developed but in the Old Germanic languages, due to the stress that was fixed on the root and the weakening of the end of a word as a result, the declensions started to disappear. While the nouns and adjectives still preserved stem-suffixes, they had declensions but once the stem suffixes started to weaken and disappear, the declensions were lost as well and the endings were simplified and got fewer:
Word Structure | |||
PG |
mak-oj-an |
root + stem-suffix(word-deriv.) |
+ gram. ending(form-marker) |
Old Germanic Languages |
mac-ian |
stem (root melted with stem-suffix) |
+ gram. ending |
Sound Interchange – the usage of interchange of vowels and consonants for the purpose of word- and form-building (e.g.: English: bear – birth, build – built, tooth – teeth; German: gebären – Geburt)
Ablaut/Vowel Gradation – an independent vowel interchange, unconnected with any phonetic conditions (phonetic environment/surrounding) used to differentiate between grammatical forms of one and the same word. The Germanic ablaut was consistently used in building the principle forms of strong verbs.
Jacob Grimm has subdivided all the verbs into two groups according to the way they build their principle forms:
|
Strong Verbs (irregular) |
Weak Verbs (regular) | |
called so because they have preserved the richness of forms since the time of Proto-Germanic |
called so because they have lost their old Proto-Germanic forms and acquired new ones | ||
form-building |
vowel interchange + gram. ending |
suffix –d/t (a Germanic invention!!!) | |
E.g. |
OE |
reisan – rais – risum – risans |
macian – macode - macod |
|
cepan – cepte - cept | ||
ModE |
rise – rose - risen |
make – made – made | |
|
keep – kept – kept |
The most important innovation in Gmc was the emergence of the new types of verbs – “weak”, past tense with the dental suffix d: open – opened, work – worked.
IN LEXIS:
Native words
In all Gmc languages we find a number of words which are not found in the other IE languages, have no parallels outside the group. Appeared from purely Gmc roots, spheres: nature, sea, home life (sea, house, God, send, drink, broad, own).
The most ancient etymological layer in the Gmc vocabulary is made up by words (roots) shared by most IE languages (natural phenomena, animals & plants, some pronouns and numerals): Fr deux – R два– OE twa – NE two.
Borrowings
Latin words ( refer to trade and warfare). The words reflect the contacts of the Gmc tribes with Rome and the influence of the Roman civilization on their life. Ex: Lat strata via – OE stræt – NE street