- •Unit 2 Cinema Part 1. General Overview Lead-in
- •Reading
- •Why we Should not be Ashamed of What we Like to Watch
- •Exercises
- •Talking and Writing
- •Role-play
- •Additional Language Exercises
- •Unit 2 Cinema Part 2 Action & Adventure Lead-in
- •Reading
- •Exercises
- •Viewer Comments:
- •Exercises
- •Talking and Writing
- •Role-play
- •Additional Language Exercises
- •Translation Exercise
- •Unit 2 Cinema Part 3. Moguls and Others Lead-in
- •Reading
- •Breaking the Mold
- •Avoiding Typecasting
- •Feels Like Home
- •Appearance
- •Characters
- •Choosing a Role
- •Producer
- •Love for Acting
- •Drawbacks of Fame
- •Epilogue
- •Exercises
- •Talking and Writing
- •Role-play
- •Additional Vocabulary Exercises
- •Unit 2 Cinema Part 4 Ukrainian Scene Lead-in
- •18 World premieres and 3 directing debuts in the berlinale competition 2002
- •Plot Outline
- •Editorial Review
- •Press Conference in Kyiv
- •The Washington Post, October 2, 2002; Page c01, abridged
- •Exercises
- •Reading
- •Bohdan Stupka
- •Role-play
- •Plan of film production for 2001- 2002 at the National Alexander Dovzhenko Film Studio
Translation Exercise
Make a written translation of the text into Ukrainian.
From Nigella Lawson's "Private Lives, Cutting Edges",
Observer, September 17, 2000
Is there anyone who truly believes that seeing a violent film is going to make them violent? No - but we all fear the effect it has on others. Of course, our fears are - as they should be - concerned mostly with the vulnerable young, and that certainly seems to be the drive behind the latest rethink of film-categorisation and censorship policy.
Yet however well intentioned any discussion of censorship rules or guidance, there is an inherent problem. Our society is violent. Not as violent as it has been (though there wasn't the mass entertainment business around to exploit it), but we do seem to enjoy violence and no amount of censorship can have any impact on that.
While I can understand the primitive bloodlust that lies behind the desire to see as much detailed, hideously realistic violence in the name of entertainment as possible, I am more disturbed by the impulse itself than its screen manifestation. And this is not because I feel there is a danger of our being actively corrupted: it's that our appetite for it is a sign of our prior corruption. Perhaps our untroubled engagement with the violent and the horrific is the natural reaction of a coddled generation: we haven't witnessed war or had to go off to fight. Our lives are protected and sanitised, and the result is that while we insist on trying to make the world less randomly dangerous than it ever can be, we are intent on immersing ourselves in lurid acts of violence that the age we live in has otherwise spared us.
If this seems inconsistent - in that I have declared my distaste for screen violence to have no basis in the belief that it might incite further public violence - it is because the two areas of concern are disparate.
… But the sort of violence people pay to go and see is cartoon-violence. It's for amusement. It's not really that much different from the enjoyment taken in a television series such as Casualty, which is not shocking or repellent, but does in the same way make one wonder about what kind of people we are that we take so much pleasure in viewing people even play-acting distress, pain, suffering, the rest. In part, I envy those whose lives are so untouched by personal catastrophe that they feel impelled to make up the shortfall cinematically or on television. …
Unit 2 Cinema Part 3. Moguls and Others Lead-in
Below are some terms referring to people who take part in decision making in film industry. Match the terms to the definitions.
mogul
editor
producer
director
auteur
scriptwriter
a) Director with "artistic" ambitions.
b) Powerful decision-maker in Hollywood, especially a studio boss.
c) The individual who decides what scenes are to be used, how, where, in what sequence, and at what length they will appear.
d) Person who writes the screenplay.
e) Person who is in charge of organising and making arrangements for a film, controlling the film budget, exercising general supervision over the production and personnel.
f) The individual who interprets the script in terms of cinematic technique, supervises all phases of the work involved in achieving a unified film presentation and assumes responsibility for what appears on the screen.
M
atch
the names of jobs and objects with the images in the picture beside.
the props the extra
the movie actress the lighter
the set the make-up man
the camera man the script
the motion picture camera the assistant operator
the microphone the microphone gallows
the spot-light the director
the assistant director the camera truck
the technician the actor
the sound operator
Imagine you have just seen a film where you have enjoyed everything to the smallest detail. Whose names of the film production staff would you like to memorise most? Choose some five jobs, write them down on a list in the order of importance (as you see it) and explain your choice.
Music Director, Casting Director, Costume Designer, Make-up Director, Visual Effects Supervisor, Production Designer, Director of Photography, Scriptwriter, Set Director, Director, Producer, Sound Engineer, Film Editor, Technical Director
