William J. Rothwell - Effective Succession Planning (2005)(3-e)(en)
.pdf238 |
CLOS ING TH E ‘‘ DEVE LO PME NTAL GAP ’’ |
|
|
bent to review the individual’s present work requirements and performance against the requirements of the incumbent’s position and to recommend planned developmental activities to narrow the gap between what the employee already knows and can do and what he or she should know or do to perform in the place of the key position incumbent.
When diagnosing learning needs, be aware that the quality of the results depends on the quality of the diagnosis. Shortcuts are not conducive to useful outcomes. While busy executives might prefer to short-circuit this process, that will usually prove to be counterproductive.
Step 4: Specify Learning Objectives Based on the Results of Step 3
Learning objectives are the outcomes or results that are sought from planned developmental activities. Needs represent deficiencies or problems to be solved; objectives, on the other hand, represent desired solutions. Each need should be linked to one—or more—learning objectives to ensure that each ‘‘problem’’ will be solved.
Learning objectives should always be stated in measurable terms. As Robert F. Mager has noted, learning objectives should usually have three components8:
▲Resources. What equipment, tools, information, or other resources must be provided for the learner to demonstrate the necessary knowledge, skills, or abilities?
▲Criteria. How will achievement of learning objectives be measured? What minimum performance standards must be achieved for the individual to demonstrate competence?
▲Conditions. Under what conditions must the learner perform?
Use the worksheet appearing in Exhibit 10-5 to prepare learning objectives based on individual developmental needs.
Step 5: Specify Learning Resources and Strategies Needed to Achieve the Learning Objectives
Learning strategies are the means by which learning objectives are to be achieved. There are many strategies by which to achieve learning objectives. Appropriate learning strategies depend on the learning objectives that are to be met. They answer this question: What planned learning activities will help narrow the gap between what individuals already know and what they must know to meet key position requirements in the future?
Learning resources are what must be provided to achieve the learning objectives. Resources might include people, money, time, expertise, equipment, or information. People resources could include trainers, coaches, mentors, or sponsors. Money resources could include funding for participation in on-the- job or off-the-job developmental experiences. Time resources could include
Developing Internal Successors |
239 |
|
|
Exhibit 10-5. A Worksheet for Preparing Learning Objectives Based on Individual Development Needs
Directions: Use this worksheet to help you prepare specific, measurable learning objectives to guide the process of meeting individual development needs.
In the left column below, indicate activities, responsibilities, duties, tasks, or essential job functions to which the individual needs exposure in order to qualify for advancement. Then, in the right column below, draft specific and measurable learning objectives to describe what individuals should be able to know, do, or feel upon completion of a planned development/learning experience tied to those activities, responsibilities, duties, tasks, or essential job functions. When you finish drafting the objectives, double-check them to ensure that you have listed (1) resources, such as information, equipment, or tools that are necessary for demonstrating the objective;
(2) measurable criteria by which to assess how well the learning objective was achieved.
Indicate Activities, Responsibilities, Duties, |
|
Tasks, or Essential Job Functions to Which |
|
the Individual Needs Exposure in Order to |
Specific and Measurable Learning |
Qualify for Advancement |
Objectives |
|
|
240 |
CLOS ING TH E ‘‘ DEVE LO PME NTAL GAP ’’ |
|
|
released time from work to participate in planned training, education, or developmental activities. Expertise could include access to knowledgeable people or information sources. Equipment could include access, for developmental purposes, to specialized machines or tools. (Use the worksheet in Exhibit 10-6 to identify the resources necessary to develop individuals for key positions for which they have been targeted.)
Step 6: Specify Evidence of Accomplishment
How can the organization track accomplishment of learning objectives? Answer that question by providing clear, measurable learning objectives and regular feedback about the learner’s progress to the learner and those interested in the learner’s development. If possible, use short, informal project appraisals or more formalized, written developmental appraisals to document individual progress, provide evidence of accomplishment, and give the individual specific feedback that can lead to future performance improvement.
Step 7: Specify How the Evidence Will Be Validated
Be clear about the means by which achievement of learning objectives will be validated. Will a knowledgeable expert, such as a key position incumbent, review the results? Will the learner be asked to complete an oral interview to demonstrate results? Will learners’ performance on developmental projects be reviewed by those with whom they work? These questions must be answered separately for each learning objective and for each learning project or assignment on which the learners are to work to qualify for advancement.
Step 8: Review the Contract with Consultants
Before the individual development plan is approved, it should be reviewed by knowledgeable experts. In this context, experts and consultants are meant to have broad meanings. For instance, experts and consultants might include any—or all—of the following:
▲Members of SP&M Committees
▲Friends
▲Spouses
▲Immediate Organizational Superiors
▲The Learners’ Peers
▲The Learners’ Subordinates
▲Academic Experts
▲Recognized Authorities in Other Organizations
Depending on the organization, the individual, and the key position for which the individual is being prepared, other experts or consultants might prove
Developing Internal Successors |
241 |
|
|
Exhibit 10-6. A Worksheet for Identifying the Resources Necessary to Support Developmental Experiences
Directions: Use this worksheet to help you identify the resources necessary to support planned learning/developmental experiences.
In the left column below, indicate learning objectives and the planned learning/ developmental experiences that will be used in helping an individual qualify for promotion. Then, in the right column below, indicate specifically what resources— such as information, money, trainers, equipment, time, and so forth—will be needed to allow the individual to meet each learning objective and participate in each planned learning/developmental experience.
Learning Objectives and Planned Learning/Developmental Experiences Intended to Help an Individual Qualify for Advancement
What Specific Resources Will Be Needed to Achieve Each Objective and Participate in Each Planned Learning/ Developmental Experiences?
242 |
CLOS ING TH E ‘‘ DEVE LO PME NTAL GAP ’’ |
|
|
useful. For instance, individuals may wish to identify their own mentors and ask for their advice while negotiating an IDP. In unionized settings, union members may also wish to include union representatives.
Ask the experts to provide information on which they are qualified to comment. For instance, from their perspective, does an IDP appear to have identified the right learning needs, established the right learning objectives, identified the most appropriate learning strategies and resources, and established the best means by which to evaluate results? Is it practical and capable of being completed in the time allowed? What suggested changes, if any, do the ‘‘experts’’ recommend—and why?
Step 9: Carry Out the Contract
I have found that the implementation of IDPs is the Achilles’ heel of many otherwise exemplary SP&M programs. While well conceived, many IDPs are not well executed. Hence, some means must be established to ensure account- ability—and monitor results during the IDP’s time span. That can be done by planning quarterly IDP review meetings with representatives from each major area of the organization so they can report on the progress made in their areas. Alternatively, an SP&M coordinator can pay visits to individual managers to review the progress made on IDPs in their areas of responsibility. The effect of these actions is to draw attention to the plans—and to maintain an impetus for action.
Step 10: Evaluate Learning and Outcomes
Be sure that results (learning outcomes) are measured against intentions (learning objectives and needs). There are several ways to do that. One way is to establish periodic developmental assessments, much like project-oriented performance appraisals. If this approach is used, develop a simple feedback form to provide documentation of learners’ progress on each developmental experience. They can then be reviewed upon completion of learning objectives or at agreed-upon intervals during the developmental experiences.
A second way is to provide a checklist on the IDP form to indicate whether learning objectives have been achieved. That is a simpler, albeit less ambitious and rigorous, approach than periodic developmental assessments. However, it does have the advantage of being a time-efficient approach that makes it more likely to be used by busy decision-makers. A sample individual development plan (IDP) is shown in Exhibit 10-7.
Developing Successors Internally
Internal development is a general term that refers to those developmental activities sponsored by the organization that are intended to help an individual
Developing Internal Successors |
243 |
|
|
Exhibit 10-7. A Sample Individual Development Plan
Directions: Use this individual development plan to help an individual qualify for advancement. The individual’s immediate organizational superior should complete the form and then discuss it with the individual. If the individual feels that modifications to it should be made, then the reasons for that should be discussed.
Employee’s Name |
|
|
|
|
Job Title |
|
|
|
|
||
Department |
|
|
|
|
Time in Position |
|
|
|
|||
Appraiser’s Name |
|
|
|
|
Job Title |
|
|
|
|||
Department |
|
|
|
Time in Position |
|
|
|
||||
Today’s Date |
|
Plan Covering |
|
to |
|
||||||
|
|
mo./day/yr. |
|
|
|
mo./day/yr. |
|
mo./day/yr. |
1.For what key position(s) should this individual be prepared? Alternatively, what kind of competencies should be developed? Over what time span?
2. What are the individual’s career plans/objectives?
3.What learning objectives should guide the individual’s development? (Note to appraiser: Be sure to systematically compare the individual’s current job description to a current job description for the targeted position[s] and list the identifiable gap below. Alternatively, compare the individual’s present competencies to those needed in a future position/level.)
(continues)
Developing Internal Successors |
244 |
|
|
Exhibit 10-7. (continued)
4. By what methods/strategies may the objectives be met? (Indicate a specific learning plan below, indicating learning objectives, strategies by which to achieve the objectives, deadlines for achieving each result, and a checklist indicating whether the learning objective was achieved.) Add paper if necessary.
|
|
|
Verified? |
|
Learning |
|
Deadlines/ |
Yes |
No |
Objectives |
Strategies |
Benchmark Dates |
( ) |
( ) |
5. How can the relative success of each learning objective be measured?
Learning |
|
Objectives |
Evaluation Approach |
qualify for advancement by closing the gap between present work requirements/performance and future work requirements/potential. Indeed, it is the means by which individual potential is realized as the future unfolds in the present.
There are several approaches to internal development. Many ways have been devised to develop individuals in their present positions,9 and as many as 300 ways have been devised to develop individuals.10 My 2004 survey identified common approaches to internal development. The survey results are summarized in Exhibit 10-8, and each strategy is briefly summarized in Exhibit 10-9.
Other strategies may also be used. These include:
1.Who-Based Strategies. These learning strategies focus on pairing up high potentials with individuals who have special talents—or management styles—worthy of emulation. For example, matching up a high potential with a participative manager or those possessing special abilities in startups, turnarounds, or shutdown efforts.
2.What-Based Strategies. These learning strategies focus on giving high potentials exposure to specific types of experiences, such as projects, task forces, committees, jobs, or assignments that require analytical skills, leadership skills, or skills in starting up an operation, shutting down an operation, converting a manual to an automated process, or another project of a specific kind. Additionally, service on interteam, interdepartmental, or interdivisional
(text continues on page 250)
Exhibit 10-8. Methods of Grooming Individuals for Advancement
There are many ways by which to implement succession plans, since individuals may be groomed in different ways. Review the list of possible methods by which to groom individuals in column 1 below. Then, in column 2 , check ( ) yes or no to indicate whether your organization is using it and, in column 3, circle the code indicating how effective you feel that method is in developing people to assume future responsibilities. In column 3, use the following scale: 1 Not at All Effective; 2 Not
Very Effective; 3 Somewhat Effective; 4 Effective; 5 Very Effective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Column 1 |
|
Column 2 |
|
Column 3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
How Effective Do You Feel |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
This Method Is for |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
Developing People to |
|||||
|
Possible Methods by Which |
Is Your Organization Using This |
Assume Future Job |
|||||||
|
to Groom Individuals |
Method to Develop People? |
Responsibilities? |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at |
|
|
|
Very |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Effective |
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
Yes |
|
No |
(Mean Response) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
Off-the-Job Degree Programs |
56% |
|
44% |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
Sponsored by Colleges/ Universities |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
On-Site Degree Programs Sponsored |
11% |
|
89% |
|
|
2.78 |
|
||
|
by Colleges/Universities |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continues)
Exhibit 10-8. (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
Off-the-Job Public |
Seminars |
Spon- |
56% |
44% |
3.11 |
|
|
sored by Vendors |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
Off-the-Job Public |
Seminars |
Spon- |
100% |
0% |
3.44 |
|
|
sored by Universities |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
E |
In-House Classroom Courses Tailor- |
|
|
|
|||
|
Made for Management-Level Em- |
89% |
11% |
3.67 |
|||
|
ployees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
F |
In-House Classroom Courses Pur- |
|
|
|
|||
|
chased from Outside Sources and |
56% |
44% |
3.22 |
|||
|
Modified for In-House Use |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
G |
Unplanned On-the-Job Training |
78% |
22% |
3.33 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
H |
Planned On-the-Job Training |
|
100% |
0% |
4.11 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
I |
Unplanned Mentoring Programs |
44% |
56% |
3.33 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
J |
Planned Mentoring Programs |
|
89% |
11% |
4.33 |
||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
K |
Unplanned Job Rotation Programs |
11% |
89% |
3.11 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
L |
Planned Job Rotation Programs |
56% |
44% |
4.22 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Source: William J. Rothwell, Results of a 2004 Survey on Succession Planning and Management Practices. Unpublished survey results (University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University, 2004). |
Developing Internal Successors |
247 |
|
|
Exhibit 10-9. Key Strategies for Internal Development
|
|
|
|
Appropriate and |
Strategy |
|
How to Use It |
|
Inappropriate Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
1. Off-the-Job |
|
Clarify job-related |
|
Appropriate: |
Degree |
|
courses tied to work |
|
—For meeting specialized |
Programs |
|
requirements of key |
|
individual needs that are |
Sponsored |
|
positions. |
|
not widely enough shared |
by Col- |
|
Compare individual |
|
to warrant on-site training |
leges/Uni- |
|
skills to work require- |
|
Inappropriate: |
versities |
|
ments. |
|
—For meeting highly spe- |
|
|
Identify courses re- |
|
cialized needs unique to |
|
|
lated to individual |
|
one employer |
|
|
needs. |
|
|
|
|
Tie job requirements |
|
|
|
|
to degree/course re- |
|
|
|
|
quirements, if pos- |
|
|
|
|
sible. |
|
|
2. On-Site |
|
Same basic procedure |
|
Appropriate: |
Degree |
|
as listed in #1 above. |
|
—When funding and time |
Programs |
|
|
|
are available |
Sponsored |
|
|
|
—When several people |
by Col- |
|
|
|
share similar needs |
leges/Uni- |
|
|
|
—When in-house expertise |
versities |
|
|
|
is not available |
|
|
|
|
Inappropriate: |
|
|
|
|
—When conditions listed |
|
|
|
|
above cannot be met |
|
|
|
|
—For meeting highly spe- |
|
|
|
|
cialized needs |
3.Off-the-Job Public Seminars Sponsored by Vendors
Compare work re- |
|
Appropriate: |
quirements to the in- |
|
—When needs are limited |
structional objectives |
|
to a few people |
indicated by informa- |
|
—When in-house expertise |
tion about the off-the- |
|
does not match the ven- |
job seminar. |
|
dor’s |
|
|
Inappropriate: |
|
|
—For meeting needs unique |
|
|
to one employer |
(continues)