Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

ECHO 2013 / Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement The Future is Now 2

.pdf
Скачиваний:
28
Добавлен:
03.06.2015
Размер:
19.36 Mб
Скачать

MitraClip Implant Experience (2005-2011)

EVEREST II

(Randomized Controlled

Trial)

27%

73%

10%

90%

REALISM Commercial

(Continued Access

(Europe, Canada, Asia,

Registry)

Australia)

47%

 

 

53%

34%

66%

 

 

Degenerative

Functional

25%

54% 46%

75%

Standard Risk

*High Risk

*STS greater than 12 or; Porcelain aorta or mobile ascending aortic atheroma; Post-radiation mediastinum; Previous mediastinitis; Functional MR with EF < 40%; Over 75 years old with EF < 40%; Prior re-operation with patent grafts; Two or more prior chest surgeries; Hepatic cirrhosis; Three or more of the following STS high risk factors: Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL, Prior chest surgery, Age over 75, EF < 35%

Trial design

~450 patients enrolled at up to 75 US sites

Significant FMR (3+ - 4+ by core lab) Not indicated for mitral valve surgerySpecific anatomical criteria

Randomize 1:1

MitraClip

Control group

Standard of care

N≈210

N≈210

 

Clinical and TTE follow-up:

1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60 months

Final definition to be determined in collaboration with FDA

CAUTION: Investigational device. Limited by Federal (U.S.) law to investigational use only.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Devices

Leaflets

MitraClip

Leaflet ablation

Space occupier

Chordal implants

Transapical

Transapical-Transseptal

Annulus

Coronary sinus annuloplasty

Direct annuloplasty

Mechanical cinching

Energy mediated cinching

Hybrid

MV replacement

Mitralign Annuloplasty

Bident (2x2) Procedure

Wire-delivery catheter and wire crossing

Bident catheter and second wire delivery

 

Plication and Lock at the P3 site

Plication and Lock at the P1 and P3 site

Mitralign Procedure

Pledgets Delivery

Pledget Delivery Catheter crossing the annulus

Courtesy Saibal Kar, MD

Transcatheter MV Implantation:

Challenges

Delivery

Fold/compress, size (larger than aortics)

Fixation

More complex structure

No calcium to grab radially

Not a round valve, particularly when diseased and less pliable

Orientation may be important

Seal

Paravalvular leak likely less well tolerated than aortic (hemolysis)

Function

LVOT obstruction a concern

Need to preserve the subvalvular apparatus

MV Replacement

Endovalve-Herrmann prosthesis

Implant consists of

Foldable nitinol structure

Specially designed grippers

Transapical and Transatrial approaches being evaluated in animal studies

Endovalve Inc. ., Winchester, Massachusetts

MV Replacement

CardiAQ

Self expanding bi-level

Delivered transseptally

nitinol frame

• Animal studies

 

• Two sets of opposing anchors

 

CardiAQ Valve Technologies, Inc., Winchester, Massachusetts

Transapical mitral valved stent implantation

Electropolished, radially selfexpanding valved stent

Atrial fixation system connected at 45°

Tubular portion with bovine pericadial valve (28 mm)

Ventricular fixation system

Catheter based delivery system (10.5 mm)

Lutter G, Lozonschi L

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010

Final Thoughts

Proof of principle for both degenerative & functional MR repair with MitraClip Device

Surgical options largely preserved

EVEREST II randomized trial results in 1 year

Landmark results with 1st percutaneous repair technology to complete a trial

Prospective evaluation of current mitral valve surgery

?role for patients with good surgical option

Unmet need for poor surgical candidates

High risk randomized trial (COAPT) to begin 2012

Vs. medical Rx---repeat hospitalizations as primary endpoint