
H.O. Pierson. Handbook of carbon, graphite, diamond and fullerenes. Properties, processing and applications. 1993
.pdf
176 |
Carbon, |
Graphite, |
Diamond, |
and |
Fullerenes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Of |
the |
two |
fibers, |
only the wet-spun |
PAN |
is |
used |
as precursor. |
It |
||||||||||
contains |
a |
co-polymer, |
|
such |
as |
itaconic |
acid |
or other |
proprietary |
com- |
||||||||||
pounds, |
that |
apparently |
catalyzes |
the |
cyclization |
in |
air |
and |
helps |
the |
||||||||||
carbonization |
|
process.r] |
The |
dry-spun fiber is |
not |
as |
suitable |
and |
is |
not |
||||||||||
used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stretching. |
The |
spun |
fiber |
is |
composed |
of |
a fibrillar |
or |
ribbon-like |
||||||||||
network, |
which |
|
acquires |
a |
preferred |
orientation |
parallel |
to |
the |
fiber |
axis, |
|||||||||
providing |
that |
the fiber |
is stretched |
either |
while |
it is still |
|
in the coagulating |
||||||||||||
bath, |
or subsequently |
in boiling |
water, |
as shown |
in Fig. 8.4. |
This |
stretching |
|||||||||||||
results in an elongation |
|
of 500 to 1300%, |
and is an essential |
step to obtain |
||||||||||||||||
a high-strength |
|
fiber. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stretching |
Oxidation |
(Steam Atmosphere) |
(Air at 230°C) |
Spool
Figure 8.4. Schematic of stretching and oxidation steps in the production of PANbased carbon fibers.t5]
Stabilization |
and |
Oxidation. |
During the |
carbonization |
|
process, |
the |
|||||||||
elimination |
of the |
non-carbon |
elements |
(hydrogen |
and nitrogen) is usually |
|||||||||||
accompanied by chain scission |
and relaxation |
of the fibrillar |
structure. |
This |
||||||||||||
isdetrimental |
totheformation |
of high-strength |
and high-modulus fibers, |
but |
||||||||||||
can be avoided by a stabilization |
|
process |
prior |
to carbonization. |
|
|||||||||||
This |
stabilization |
consists |
of slowly |
heating |
the |
stretched |
fiber to 200 - |
|||||||||
280°C in an oxygen |
atmosphere |
(usually |
|
air) under |
tension |
to |
maintain |
the |
||||||||
orientation |
ofthe |
polymer |
skeleton |
and stabilize |
|
the structure |
(Fig. 8.4). The |
|||||||||
addition |
of ammonia |
to |
oxygen |
increases |
the |
rate |
of stabilization.t13] |
|

|
|
|
|
|
Carbon |
Fibers |
177 |
The molecular changes occurring during stabilization are shown in |
|||||||
Fig.8.5.t”) |
The oxidation |
causes |
the formation |
of C=C |
bonds |
and the |
|
incorporation |
of hydroxyl |
(-OH) and |
carbonyl (-CO) |
groups |
in the structure. |
||
These |
factors promote cross-linking and thermal |
stabilization of the fiber |
|||||
which, |
at this stage, can no longer |
melt. This non-meltable characteristic |
|||||
is essential |
to prevent the filaments from fusing together. |
|
|
H2 |
|
H2 |
H2 |
|
\~/“\~/“\~A~/ |
|
|
|
|
I |
I |
I |
|
I |
c\\\ |
c\\\ |
c\\\ |
|
c\\\ |
N |
|
N |
N |
N |
Pan Homopolymer |
|
|
||
H |
|
H |
H |
|
After |
|
Stabilization |
|
OH |
|
OH |
OH |
\c/c\c/c\c/c\c/ |
|
|
|
I |
I |
I |
I |
,c\N/c\N/c\N/ |
|
|
% |
After Oxidation
(Simplified)
Figure 8.5. Molecular changes in PAN after stabilization and oxidation.[“]

178 |
Carbon, |
Graphite, |
|
Diamond, |
and |
Fuiierenes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Carbonization |
and |
Graphitization. |
Carbonization |
takes |
place |
be- |
||||||||||||||
tween |
|
1000 |
and |
1500°C. |
These temperatures |
are reached |
slowly, |
at a |
|||||||||||||
heating |
rate |
of |
- |
20”C/min. |
During |
this |
stage |
a considerable |
|
amount |
of |
||||||||||
volatile |
by-products |
is released. |
These |
include |
H,O, CO,, CO, NH,, HCN, |
||||||||||||||||
CH,, |
and other |
hydrocarbons. |
|
The |
carbon yield |
is between |
50 and |
55%. |
|||||||||||||
The circular |
morphology |
|
of the |
fiber |
is maintained |
and the |
final |
diameter |
|||||||||||||
varies |
|
from |
5 to |
10 pm, |
which |
|
is approximately |
half that |
of the |
precursor |
|||||||||||
PAN |
fiber. |
The |
removal |
of |
nitrogen |
occurs |
gradually |
over |
a range |
of |
|||||||||||
temperatures |
as shown |
below:tll] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600°C - nitrogen evolution starts
900X - maximum evolution
1000°C - 6% nitrogen left
|
|
1300°C |
- |
0.3% nitrogen |
left |
|
|
|
|
||
The tensile modulus |
of the fiber |
can be further |
increased |
by graphiti- |
|||||||
zation. |
It can |
be argued |
|
that |
the term |
“graphitization” |
is not |
correct since a |
|||
true graphite |
structure |
is not |
obtained, and |
“high-temperature |
heat-treat- |
||||||
ment” |
would |
be a better |
term. This heat-treatment is usually |
carried |
out at |
||||||
temperatures |
up to 2500°C. |
The final |
carbon |
content |
is greater |
than |
99%. |
2.3Structure of PAN-based Carbon Fibers
|
Analytical |
Techniques. |
|
|
Analytical |
techniques |
to |
|
determine |
the |
||||||||||||||||
structure |
|
of carbon |
fibers |
include: |
wide-angle |
|
and small-angle |
x-ray diffrac- |
||||||||||||||||||
tion, |
electron |
|
diffraction, |
neutron |
scattering, |
Raman |
spectroscopy, |
electron |
||||||||||||||||||
microscopy, |
and |
optical |
microscopy. |
Detailed |
reviews |
of these |
techniques |
|||||||||||||||||||
are |
found |
in the |
literature.t14] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Structure. |
The |
structure |
of PAN-based |
carbon |
fibers |
is still |
conjec- |
||||||||||||||||||
tural |
to |
some |
degree. |
|
Yet, |
thanks |
to |
the |
recent |
advances |
|
in |
analytical |
|||||||||||||
techniques |
|
just |
mentioned, |
an |
accurate |
picture |
is beginning |
to emerge. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Unlike |
the |
well-ordered |
|
parallel |
|
planes |
of |
pyrolytic |
graphite |
which |
|||||||||||||||
closely |
match |
the |
structure |
of the graphite |
crystal, |
the structure |
|
of |
PAN- |
|||||||||||||||||
based carbon |
fibers |
is essentially |
turbostratic |
|
and is composed |
of small |
two- |
|||||||||||||||||||
dimensional |
fibrils |
or ribbons. |
|
These |
are already |
present |
in the |
precursor |
||||||||||||||||||
and |
are |
preferentially |
aligned |
parallel |
to the |
axis |
of the fiber. |
The |
structure |
|||||||||||||||||
may |
also |
include |
lamellas |
(small, |
flat |
plates) |
and |
is probably |
|
a combination |
||||||||||||||||
of both |
fibrils |
and lamellas.t1)t15] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon |
Fibers |
|
|
179 |
||||||
|
Crystallite |
Size. |
Several |
structural |
models |
|
have |
been proposed |
includ- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ing the one shown |
in Fig.8.6.n1) The critical parameters |
(as determined |
by x- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ray diffraction) |
are L,_,which |
represents |
the stack |
height |
of the ribbon and the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crystallite |
|
size |
l_ |
|
which in this |
case can be considered |
as the mean |
length of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
a straight |
|
section |
of the |
fibril.nl] |
This |
alignment |
(l_) |
becomes |
more |
pro- |
||||||||||||||||||||||
nounced |
after high-temperature |
heat-treatment |
which |
tends |
to straighten |
|
the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
fibrils. |
However, |
|
L, |
still remains |
small |
and is generally |
less than |
20 |
nm, as |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
shown |
in |
|
Fig.8.7.m |
This |
figure |
also |
shows |
the |
much |
greater |
increase |
of |
||||||||||||||||||||
crystallite |
|
size |
(La) of pitch-based |
fibers |
(see |
Sec. |
3.0 below). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
The |
|
straightening |
of the |
fibrils |
occurs |
preferentially, |
the |
outer |
fibrils |
||||||||||||||||||||||
being |
more |
oriented |
(straightened) |
than the inner ones as |
shown |
in |
|
Fig. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.8.f”) |
This |
has |
an important |
|
and favorable |
consequence, |
that |
is, most of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
the |
load-bearing |
|
capacity |
is now |
transferred |
to the |
outer portion |
or “skin”of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
the |
fiber. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interlayer |
|
Spacing. |
|
The change |
in interlayer |
spacing |
(c spacing) |
of |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
PAN-based |
carbon |
fibers |
as |
a function |
of heat-treatment |
temperature |
is |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
shown |
in Fig.8.9.p) |
This |
spacing |
never |
shrinks |
to less than |
0.344 |
|
nm, even |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
after a 3000°C heat-treatment, |
|
indicating |
a poor |
alignment |
|
of the |
basal |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
planes |
and the |
presence |
of defects, |
stacking |
faults, |
and dislocations. |
|
This |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
behavior |
|
is characteristic |
of carbons |
produced |
from |
polymers |
(see |
Ch. |
6). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Also shown |
in Fig. 8.9 is the decrease |
in interlayer |
spacing |
of a pitch-based |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fiber. |
It is far more |
pronounced |
than |
that |
of the |
|
PAN-based |
fiber |
|
(see |
Sec. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
3.0 |
below). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Sp* and Sp3 Bonding. |
|
Another |
important |
structural |
characteristic |
of |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
PAN-based |
fibers |
is |
the |
probable |
existence |
|
of |
sp3 |
hybrid |
bonding |
|
as |
||||||||||||||||||||
indicated |
|
by Raman |
spectroscopy |
and shown |
in Fig. 8.10. |
In thisfigure, |
|
the |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
pitch-based graphitized fiber |
|
(PI |
00) |
is the only |
one |
to |
exhibit |
a strong |
|
sp* |
||||||||||||||||||||||
line. All others show structural |
|
disorders which |
may be caused |
by some |
sp3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
b0nding.p) |
|
The |
fibers |
listed |
in Fig. ‘8.10 are |
identified |
in Sets. |
6.3 and |
6.4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both sp* and sp3 hybrid |
bonds |
are |
strong |
covalent |
bonds, |
with |
|
the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
following |
|
bond |
energy |
and |
bond |
lengths |
(see |
Ch. 2, Sets. |
3 and |
4): |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sP3 |
- |
370 |
kJ/mol |
and |
0.15 |
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sP* |
- |
680 |
kJ/mol |
and |
0.13 |
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
These strong bonds within the crystallites |
(or fibrils) and |
the |
preferred |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
orientation |
|
of these |
crystallites |
account, |
at least |
|
in part, for the |
high |
stiffness |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
inherent |
to |
most |
|
carbon |
fibers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes
,20nm,
Figure 8.6. Proposed structural model for carbon fiber.[“]
Pitch-Based Carbon Fiber
Carbon Fibers
(Average of 3)
a
|
1000 |
1400 |
1800 |
2200 |
2600 |
3000 |
|
|
|
Heat-Treatment Temperature, “C |
|
||||
Figure |
8.7. Apparent |
crystalline |
size |
(LJ |
of PAN-based and |
pitch-based carbon |
|
fibers |
as a function of |
heat-treatment |
temperature.rJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon Fibers |
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 Inm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
Figure |
8.8. |
Model |
ofa |
PAN-based carbon fiber |
in cross-section |
showing the “skin” |
||||
effect |
(not |
to |
scale).[“l |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
0.355 |
Pan-Based |
Carbon |
Fibers |
|
|
||
|
I= |
|
|
|||||||
|
03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OJ 0.350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
.r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
& |
0.345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
& |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
z? |
0.340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
2 |
(P-55) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
5 |
|
|
Ideal Graphite |
Crystal |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
1400 |
1800 |
2200 |
2600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heat-Treatment Temperature, “C |
|
||||
Figure |
8.9. |
Mean |
interlayer spacing |
(c/2) of PAN-based and |
pitch-based |
carbon |
||||
fibers |
as a function |
of |
heat-treatment |
temperature.r] |
|
|
|
182 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDjIG |
|
|
|
T 300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
||
|
(AMOCO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
G30.500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pan- |
(BASF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
GUO-500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(BASF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
||
|
TORAY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rayon- |
(UC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
||
Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
T75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
(UC) |
-J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
P 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pitch- |
(AMOCO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based |
P 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
||
|
(AMOCO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
I |
& |
1 |
I |
|
t |
I |
I |
|
I |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
1800 |
|
1600 |
|
1400 |
|
1200 |
|
|
1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raman Shift, cm-’ |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Figure |
8.10. |
Laser |
Raman |
spectroscopy |
of PAN-based, |
rayon-based, |
and |
pitch- |
|||||||
based |
carbon |
fibers.~] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To summarize, |
small |
crystallite |
size, |
high |
interlayer |
spacing, |
and |
||||||||
general |
structural |
disorder |
|
are the |
factors that contribute |
to the unique |
and |
||||||||
stable |
turbostratic |
structure |
of PAN-based |
carbon |
|
fibers |
(which |
is likely |
to |
||||||
include |
both |
sp* and sp3 hybrid bonds), |
and |
explain |
their |
inability |
to form |
a |
|||||||
graphiticstructure |
even after high-temperature |
heat-treatment |
(i.e., 3000°C). |
Carbon Fibers 183
3.0CARBON FIBERS FROM PITCH
3.1Pitch Composition
|
As |
seen |
in |
Ch. 5, |
Sec. 2.1, pitch |
is a by-product of the destructive |
||||||
distillation |
of coal, crude |
oil, or asphalt. |
It meets the |
conditions |
for |
carbon- |
||||||
fiber |
production |
stated |
|
above |
(Sec. 2.1) and |
is inexpensive |
and |
readily |
||||
available. |
Its carbon yield can exceed |
60%, |
which |
is appreciably |
higher |
|||||||
than |
the |
yield |
of PAN |
(- |
50%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The |
composition |
of pitch |
includes |
four generic |
fractions |
with |
variable |
||||
proportions!’ |
‘1 These |
are: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. The saturates, which are aliphatic compounds with low molecular weight similar to wax
. The napthene aromatics, which are low-molecular- weight compounds with saturated ring
. The polar aromatics, which are medium-molecular- |
weight |
||||||
compounds |
with |
some |
heterocyclic |
molecules |
|
||
. The asphaltenes, |
which |
have |
high |
molecular |
weight and |
||
a high degree of aromaticity. |
The higher |
the |
ratio of |
||||
asphaltene, |
the higherthesoftening |
point, thermalstability, |
|||||
and carbon |
yield. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2Carbon Fibers from isotropic Pitch
Low-cost |
carbon |
fibers are produced from |
an isotropic |
pitch with a low- |
||||||
softening |
point. |
The |
precursor |
is melt-spun, |
thermoset |
at relatively |
low |
|||
temperature, |
and |
carbonized. |
The |
resulting |
fibers generally have |
low |
||||
strength |
and |
modulus |
(- |
35 - 70 GPa). |
They are suitable for insulation |
and |
||||
filler applications. |
Their |
cost dropped |
to less |
than $20/kg |
in 1992.t6) |
|
3.3Carbon Fibers from Mesophase Pitch
Carbon |
fibers from |
mesophase |
pitch have high |
modulus and |
medium |
||||
strength. They |
are presently |
more |
costly |
than PAN-based |
fibers ($65/kg in |
||||
1992). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precursor |
Pitch. |
The |
precursor |
material is |
a mesophase |
pitch, |
|||
characterized |
|
by a high |
percentage of |
asphaltene. |
Table 8.5 shows the |
||||
approximate |
composition |
of three |
common mesophase |
compounds. |
184 Carbon, Graphite, Diamond, and Fullerenes
Table 8.5. Composition |
of Mesophase |
Pitch |
|
|
Product |
|
|
Composition, |
% |
Ashland |
240* |
Asphaltene |
62 |
|
|
|
Polar aromatics |
9 |
|
|
|
Naphthene |
aromatics |
29 |
Ashland |
260* |
Asphaltene |
83 |
|
|
|
Polar aromatics |
7 |
|
|
|
Naphthene |
aromatics |
10 |
CTP 240* |
Asphaltene |
68 |
||
|
|
Polar aromatics |
11 |
|
|
|
Naphthene |
aromatics |
21 |
* Petroleum pitch, product of Ashland, Petroleum, Ashland, KY
*Coal tar pitch
Processing. |
The processing |
of mesophase-pitch |
fibers |
is similar to |
||||||||
that of PAN |
fibers, |
except |
that the |
costly |
stretching |
step |
during heat- |
|||||
treatment |
is |
not |
necessary, |
making |
the |
process potentially |
less |
expen- |
||||
sive.t16)t1fl |
The |
processing |
steps |
can |
be |
summarized |
as follows |
and are |
||||
represented |
schematically |
in Fig. |
8.11: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1. |
Polymerization |
of the |
isotropic |
pitch |
to produce |
|
||||||
|
mesophase |
pitch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Spinning the mesophase pitch to obtain a “greenfiber”.
3. |
Thermosetting |
the green fiber. |
|
4. |
Carbonization |
and graphitization |
of the thermoset fiber to |
|
obtain a high-modulus carbon |
fiber. |
Polymerization. |
The pitch is heated |
to approximately 400°C and is |
||||||
transformed |
from |
an |
isotropic |
to a mesophase |
(or liquid |
crystal) |
structure |
|
consisting |
of large |
polyaromatic |
molecules |
with |
oriented |
layers |
in parallei |
|
stacking. |
This structure is similar to the |
needle-coke |
stage |
of molded |
||||
carbons described |
in Ch. 4, Sec. 2.3. |
|
|
|
|
Carbon Fibers 185
Pitch Polymerization
Thermosetting
Carbonization
Spinneret
Figure |
8.11. Schematic of the production steps in the manufacture of pitch-based |
carbon |
fibers. |
|
Spinning and Thermosetting.[12] The mesophase |
pitch ismelt-spun |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
in a mono- |
or multifilament |
spinneret, |
heated |
to 300 - 450°C and pressurized |
|||||||||||||||||||||
with |
inert |
gas. |
|
It |
is |
drawn |
at |
a |
speed |
>120 |
|
m/min |
for |
a |
draw |
ratio of |
|||||||||
approximately |
1000/l |
to |
a diameter |
of |
IO |
- 15 pm. |
|
The |
|
draw |
ratio |
is an |
|||||||||||||
important |
factor |
in the control of the |
orientation |
of the fiber |
structure: |
the |
|||||||||||||||||||
higher |
the |
|
draw, |
the |
greater the orientation |
and |
uniformity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
At this |
stage |
the |
fiber |
is thermoplastic |
and |
a thermosetting |
operation |
|||||||||||||||||
is needed |
to avoid |
the relaxation |
of the structure |
and |
|
prevent |
the |
filaments |
|||||||||||||||||
from |
fusing |
together. |
This thermosetting |
operation |
|
is |
carried |
out |
in an |
||||||||||||||||
oxygen |
atmosphere |
or |
in |
an |
oxidizing |
liquid |
at approximately |
|
300°C, |
||||||||||||||||
causing |
oxidation |
|
cross-linking |
and stabilization |
|
of the filament. |
Tempera- |
||||||||||||||||||
ture control |
during |
this thermosetting |
step |
is |
critical |
|
since |
|
a temperature |
||||||||||||||||
which |
|
is |
too |
high |
would |
|
relax |
the |
material |
and |
eliminate |
its |
oriented |
||||||||||||
structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Carbonization |
and Heat-Treatment. |
The thermoset |
fibers |
are then |
||||||||||||||||||||
carbonized |
|
at temperatures |
up to |
1000°C. |
This |
is done |
slowly to |
prevent |
|||||||||||||||||
rapid |
gas |
evolution |
and the |
formation |
of bubbles |
and |
other |
flaws. |
|
Carbon- |
|||||||||||||||
ization |
is followed |
|
by a heat-treatment |
from |
1200 to 3OOO”C, at the end of |
||||||||||||||||||||
which |
the |
final |
structure, |
strength, |
and modulus |
are |
established |
(see |
Sec. |
||||||||||||||||
6.4 below) |
.t1°)t17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|