
- •OUTLINE
- •MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE
- •DECENTRALIZATION
- •ISSUES FOR REGIONS: THE
- •EQUALIZATION OR GROWTH: THE TRADE-OFF IN REGIONAL
- •BOTH GOALS IMPORTANT
- •REGIONAL/FEDERAL
- •ARE RELATIVELY
- •CENTRALIZATION TENDENCIES
- •DIFFERENT COUNTRIES
- •RUSSIAN FEDERALISM:
- •RUSSIA’S FAST ADVANCING
- •WHY MANY COUNTRIES STILL FOLLOW CENTRALIZED MODEL
- •DISTRIBUTED GOVERNANCE
- •EXPERIMENTAL
- •REGIONAL GENERAL ISSUES
- •SPECIAL ISSUES
- •EACH SPHERE HAS BUNDLE
- •HUMAN RESOURCES
- •DROUGHT MANAGEMENT WILL
- •DROUGHT MANAGEMENT
- •REGIONAL PROJECTS FOR
- •FLOOD MANAGEMENT: REGIONAL AND LOCAL
- •WHAT SEEMS TO WORK
- •ANSWERS EMERGING
- •ANSWERS FROM RUSSIA:
- •FEDERAL AND
- •STARTING POINT: 1998
- •THEN DECLINE, THEN
- •WHAT HAPPENED?
- •KALUGA PROJECTS (2005-8) WITH FEDERAL SUPPORT
- •PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
- •INDUSTRIAL ZONES
- •STARTED WITH 4 MAJOR
- •SPILLOVERS
- •RESULTS
- •PARTNERSHIPS
- •EXPLOITING PROXIMITY TO
- •PROBLEMS
- •SUCCESSFUL REGIONAL PROJECT
- •TECHNOLOGICAL AND INVESTMENT ORIENTATION
- •DIFFUSION OF GOVERNANCE
- •ADAPTABLE TASK-ORIENTED
- •LOOSE AND CONTROLLED
- •INDICATORS FOR CONTROLLED PROJECTS
- •INDICATORS FOR LOOSE

HUMAN RESOURCES
Must be approached by: Multi-level government
New technology (digitalization of records)
Training for E-government Youth programs (Tatarstan!)
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
23 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T |
|
|
|
||
|
H |
|
|
|
|
||
G |
|
|
|
r |
|
||
U |
|
|
|
|
w |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
O H n |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
R T e |
|
|
|
||||
D U t |
a |
|
|
|
|||
O i |
h |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
S a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
24 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

DROUGHT MANAGEMENT WILL
DIFFER
In Rostov, Volgograd, Stavropol and Kalmykia Republic (South)
Saratov, Orenburg (Volga federal district)
Kurgan, Chelyabinsk (Urals) Kemerovo (Siberian federal district)
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
25 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

DROUGHT MANAGEMENT
Caused by combinations of meteorological, hydrological and storage water deficiencies: long-term response
Surface water storage: on and off-stream storages.
Groundwater
Re-use: treated sewage and grey water.
Storm water: for treatment and supply by water authorities.
Networking systems: transfers of water within and between basins which were previously independent harvesting and supply systems.
Rainwater tanks
Dead storage pumping: water contained below conventional offtake levels.
Cloud seeding: a potential long-term measure, previously undertaken by the CSIRO to stimulate rainfall from suitable cloud formations.
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
26 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
G |
R |
i |
|
||
|
g |
|
||||
N |
|
|
e |
|
||
|
|
d |
|
|
||
I |
|
n |
|
|
||
D a |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
O L |
l |
|
|
|
|
|
O l |
c |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
L a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
r |
|
|
|
|
|
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
27 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

REGIONAL PROJECTS FOR
FLOOD MANAGEMENT
Stormwater Flood Management
Grants to manage stormwater runoff to reduce flooding
Groundwater recharge, water quality improvements,
ecosystem restoration benefits, and reduction of in-stream erosion and sedimentation.
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
28 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

FLOOD MANAGEMENT: REGIONAL AND LOCAL
Ju
29

|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
IO |
||
|
|
|
T |
G |
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
T N |
N |
||
|
|
N E |
I |
||
|
|
E |
R |
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
|
IM G |
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
R O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
E Y |
|
|
|
||
P |
A |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
W |
|
|
|
E |
A |
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
30 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

WHAT SEEMS TO WORK
Ideas from other transition countries
Ideas from the EU
Ideas from Russia’s own experience
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
31 |
- 2 0 1 2 |

ANSWERS EMERGING
Regions as “Investment Machines”
•Coordinated policies toward inward investment
•Combined efforts by Regions, State, Localities
•Good government
•Predictability
•Trustworthiness
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
|
, |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
y |
|
|
l |
|
|
Ju |
|
|
Л Е Т Н И Й К А М П У С А К А Д Е М И И П Р И П Р Е З И Д Е Н Т Е Р Ф |
32 |
- 2 0 1 2 |