Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1649_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
12.10.2026
Размер:
6 Мб
Скачать
☆
Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Since the Classical
101
[43] Mortelé, KJ; Mergo, PJ; Taylor, HM; Ernst, MD; Ros, PR. Renal and
perirenal space involvement in acute pancreatitis: spiral CT findings.
Abdom Imaging., 2000, 25(3), 272-278.
[44] Balthazar, EJ; Robinson, DL; Megibow, AJ; Ranson, JH. Acute
pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology, 1990,
174(2), 331-336.
[45] Mortele, KJ; Wiesner, W; Intriere, L; Shankar, S; Zou, KH; Kalantari,
BN; Perez, A; vanSonnenberg, E; Ros, PR; Banks, PA; Silverman, SG.
A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis:
improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol.,
2004, 183(5), 1261-1265.
[46] Mortelé, KJ; Mergo, PJ; Taylor, HM; Wiesner, W; Cantisani, V; Ernst,
MD; Kalantari, BN; Ros, PR. Peripancreatic vascular abnormalities
complicating acute pancreatitis: contrast-enhanced helical CT findings.
Eur J Radiol., 2004, 52(1), 67-72.
[47] Banday, IA; Gattoo, I; Khan, AM; Javeed, J; Gupta, G; Latief, M.
Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index for Evaluation of
Acute Pancreatitis and its Correlation with Clinical Outcome: A Tertiary
Care Hospital Based Observational Study. J Clin Diagn Res., 2015, 9(8),
TC01-5. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14824.6368.
[48] Banks, PA; Freeman, ML. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J
Gastroenterol., 2006, 101(10), 2379-2400.
[49] Isenmann, R; Büchler, M; Uhl, W; Malfertheiner, P; Martini, M; Beger,
HG. Pancreatic necrosis: an early finding in severe acute pancreatitis.
Pancreas., 1993, 8(3), 358-361.
[50] Shyu, JY; Sainani, NI; Sahni, VA; Chick, JF; Chauhan, NR; Conwell,
DL; Clancy, TE; Banks, PA; Silverman, SG. Necrotizing pancreatitis:
diagnosis, imaging, and intervention. Radiographics., 2014, 34(5), 1218-
1239.
[51] Bollen, TL; Singh, VK; Maurer, R; Repas, K; van Es, HW; Banks, PA;
Mortele, KJ. A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring
systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J
Gastroenterol., 2012, 107(4), 612-619.
[52] Busireddy, KK; AlObaidy, M; Ramalho, M; Kalubowila, J; Baodong, L;
Santagostino, I; Semelka, RC. Pancreatitis-imaging approach. World J
Gastrointest Pathophysiol., 2014, 5(3), 252-270.
[53] Arvanitakis, M; Delhaye, M; De Maertelaere, V; Bali, M; Winant, C;
Coppens, E; Jeanmart, J; Zalcman, M; Van Gansbeke, D; Devière, J;
Matos, C. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in
Alejandra Guillermina Miranda-Díaz et al.
102
the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology, 2004, 126(3),
715-723.
[54] Ortega, AR; Gómez-Rodríguez, R; Romero, M; Fernández-Zapardiel, S;
Céspedes Mdel, M; Carrobles, JM. Prospective comparison of
endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance
cholangiopancreatography in the etiological diagnosis of “idiopathic”
acute pancreatitis. Pancreas., 2011, 40(2), 289-294.
[55] Thomas, S; Kayhan, A; Lakadamyali, H; Oto, A. Diffusion MRI of acute
pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values.
Emerg Radiol., 2012, 19(1), 5-9.
[56] Shinya, S; Sasaki, T; Nakagawa, Y; Guiquing, Z; Yamamoto, F; Ya-
mashita, Y. Acute pancreatitis successfully diagnosed by diffusion-
weighted imaging: A case report. World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14(35),
5478-5480.
[57] Yoshikawa, T; Kawamitsu, H; Mitchell, DG; Ohno, Y; Ku, Y; Seo, Y;
Fujii, M; Sugimura, K. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and
lesions using parallel imaging technique. AJR, 2006, 187(30), 1521-
1530.
[58] Rau, BM; Bothe, A; Kron, M; Beger, HG. Role of early multisystem
organ failure as major risk factor for pancreatic infections and death in
severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol., 2006 Aug, 4(8),
1053-1061.
[59] Yi, F; Ge, L; Zhao, J; Lei, Y; Zhou, F; Chen, Z; Zhu, Y; Xia, B. Meta-
analysis: total parenteral nutrition versus total enteral nutrition in
predicted severe acute pancreatitis. Intern Med., 2012, 51(6), 523-530.
[60] Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA
evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis.
Pancreatology., 2013, 13(4 Suppl 2), e1-15.
[61] Eckerwall, GE; Tingstedt, BB; Bergenzaun, PE; Andersson, RG.
Immediate oral feeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis is safe
and may accelerate recovery-a randomized clinical study. Clin Nutr.,
2007, 26(6), 758-763.
[62] Sun, JK; Mu, XW; Li, WQ; Tong, ZH; Li, J; Zheng, SY. Effects of early
enteral nutrition on immune function of severe acute pancreatitis
patients. World J Gastroenterol., 2013, 19(6), 917-922.
[63] Windsor, JA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition
formulations in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg., 2009, 96(11), 1243-1252.
Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Since the Classical
103
[64] Petejova, N; Martinek, A. Acute kidney injury following acute
pancreatitis: A review. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc
Czech Repub., 2013, 157(2), 105-111.
[65] Capurso, G; Zerboni, G; Signoretti, M; Valente, R; Stigliano, S;
Piciucchi, M; Delle Fave, G. Role of the gut barrier in acute pancreatitis.
J Clin Gastroenterol., 2012, 46 Suppl, S46-S51.
[66] Zhao, G; Zhang, JG; Wu, HS; Tao, J; Qin, Q; Deng, SC; Liu, Y; Liu, L;
Wang, B; Tian, K; Li, X; Zhu, S; Wang, CY. Effects of different
resuscitation fluid on severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol.,
2013, 19(13), 2044-2052.
[67] Lipinski, M; Rydzewska-Rosolowska, A; Rydzewski, A; Rydzewska, G.
Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: Normal saline or lactated
Ringer's solution? World J Gastroenterol., 2015, 21(31), 9367-9372.
Doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9367.
[68] Bachmann, KA; Trepte, CJ; Tomko¨, tterL; Hinsch, A; Stork, J;
Bergmann, W; Heidelmann, L; Strate, Goetz AE; Reuter, DA; Izbicki,
JR; Mann, O. Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on survival and
microcirculation in severe acute pancreatitis: a randomized experimental
trial. Crit Care., 2014, 17(6), R281.
[69] Mallédant, Y; Malbrain, ML; Reuter, DA. What’s new in the
management of severe acute pancreatitis? Intensive Care Med., 2015,
41(11), 1957-1960. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3903-1.
[70] Katz, MD; Erstad, BL. Octreotide, a new somatostatin analogue. Clin
Pharm, 1989, 8(4), 255-273.
[71] Cavallini, G; Frulloni, L. Somatostatin and octreotide in acute
pancreatitis: the never-ending story. Dig Liver Dis, 2001, 33(2), 192-
201.
[72] Uhl, W; Büchler, MW; Malfertheiner, P; Beger, HG; Adler, G; Gaus, W.
A randomised, double blind, multicentre trial of octreotide in moderate
to severe acute pancreatitis. Gut., 1999, 45(1), 97-104.
[73] Boruchowicz, A; Gallon, P; Foissey, D; Gower, P; Gamblin, C;
Cuingnet, P; Maunoury, V; Cortot, A; Colombel, JF. Acute pancreatitis
associated with corticosteroid treatment in Crohn’s disease Gastroenterol
Clin Biol., 2003, 27(5), 560-561.
[74] Kylänpää, ML; Repo, H; Puolakkainen, PA. Inflammation and
immunosuppression in severe acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol.,
2010, 16(23), 2867-2872.
[75] Dong, LH; Liu, ZM; Wang, SJ; Zhao, SJ; Zhang, D; Chen, Y; Wang,
YS. Corticosteroid therapy for severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis
Alejandra Guillermina Miranda-Díaz et al.
104
of randomized, controlled trials. Int J Clin Exp Pathol., 2015, 8(7),
7654-7660.
[76] Pezzilli, R. Antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis: Do we
need more meta-analytic studies? JOP. J Pancreas (Online), 2009,
10(2), 223-224.
[77] Pettilä, V; Kyhälä, L; Kylänpää, ML; Leppäniemi, A; Tallgren, M;
Markkola, A; Puolakkainen, P; Repo, H; Kemppainen, E. APCAP-
activa- tedprotein C in acutepancreatitis: A double-blind randomized
human pilot trial. Critical Care., 2010, 14(4), R139. Doi:10.1186/
cc9203.
[78] Arias-Carvajal, O; Hermosillo-Sandoval, JM; Gutiérrez-Martínez, CA;
Pacheco-Moises, FP; Ortiz, GG; Rodríguez-Carrizalez, AD; et al.
Effects of vacuum-assisted closure and Drotrecogin alpha on
inflammatory markers in severe acute pancreatitis. Advances in
Bioscience and Biotechnology., 2013, 4, 43-53.
[79] Kyhälä, L; Mentula, P; Kylänpää, L; Moilanen, E; Puolakkainen, P;
Pettilä, V; Repo, H. Activated Protein C Does Not Alleviate the Course
of Systemic Inflammation in the APCAP Trial. Int J Inflam., 2012, 2012,
712739.
[80] Yamakawa, K; Ogura, H; Fujimi, S; Morikawa, M; Ogawa, Y; Mohri, T;
Nakamori, Y; Inoue, Y; Kuwagata, Y; Tanaka, H; Hamasaki, T;
Shimazu, T. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in sepsis-
induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: a multicenter propensity
score analysis. Intensive Care Med., 2013, 39, 644e52.
[81] Eguchi, T; Tsuji, Y; Yamashita, H; Fukuchi, T; Kanamori, A;
Matsumoto, K; Hasegawa, T; Koizumi, A; Kitada, R; Tsujimae, M;
Iwatsubo, T; Koyama, S; Ubukata, S; Fujita, M; Okada, A. Efficacy of
recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in preventing walled-off
necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis patients. Pancreatology., 2015,
15(5), 485-90.
[82] Yoshimura, J; Yamakawa, K; Ogura, H; Umemura, Y; Takahashi, H;
Morikawa, M; Inoue, Y; Fujimi, S; Tanaka, H; Hamasaki, T; Shimazu,
T. Benefit profile of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in
sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: a multicenter
propensity score analysis. Crit Care., 2015, 19, 810.
[83] Yamakawa, K; Aihara, M; Ogura, H; Yuhara, H; Hamasaki, T; Shimazu,
T. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in severe sepsis: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost., 2015, 13(4),
508-519.
Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Since the Classical
105
[84] Tenner, S; Baillie, J; DeWitt, J; Vege, SS. American College of
Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline:
management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol., 2013, 108(9),
1400-1415.
[85] Bradley, EL. 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute
pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute
Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg.,
1993, 128(5), 586-590.
[86] Uhl, W; Warshaw, A; Imrie, C; Bassi, C; McKay, CJ; Lankisch, PG;
Carter, R; Di Magno, E; Banks, PA; Whitcomb, DC; Dervenis, C;
Ulrich, CD; Satake, K; Ghaneh, P; Hartwig, W; Werner, J; McEntee, G;
Neoptolemos, JP; Büchler, MW. International Association of
Pancreatology. IAP Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Acute
Pancreatitis. Pancreatology., 2002, 2(6), 565-573.
[87] Besselink, MG; de Bruijn, MT; Rutten, JP; Boermeester, MA; Hofker,
HS; Gooszen, HG. Surgical intervention in patients with necrotizing
pancreatitis. Br J Surg., 2006, 93(5), 593-599.
[88] Horvath, KD; Kao, LS; Ali, A; Wherry, 22. KL; Pellegrini, CA;
Sinanan, MN. Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous drainage of infected
pancreatic necrosis. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15(7), 677-682.
[89] van Santvoort, HC; Besselink, MG; Horvath, KD; Sinanan, MN; Bollen,
TL; van Ramshorst, B; Gooszen, HG. Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study
Group. Videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement in infected
necrotizing pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford), 2007, 9(2), 156-159.
[90] Tsiotos, GG; Luque-de León, E; Sarr, 15. MG. Long-term outcome of
necrotizing pancreatitis treated by necrosectomy. Br J Surg, 1998,
85(12), 1650-1653.
[91] van Santvoort, HC; Besselink, MG; Bakker, OJ; Hofker, HS;
Boermeester, MA; Dejong, CH; van Goor, H; Schaapherder, AF; van
Eijck, CH; Bollen, TL; van Ramshorst, B; Nieuwenhuijs, VB; Timmer,
R; Laméris, JS; Kruyt, PM; Manusama, ER; van der Harst, E; van der
Schelling, GP; Karsten, T; Hesselink, EJ; van Laarhoven, CJ; Rosman,
C; Bosscha, K; de Wit, RJ; Houdijk, AP; van Leeuwen, MS; Buskens, E;
Gooszen, HG. Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or
open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med., 2010,
362(16), 1491-1502.
[92] Besselink, MG; Verwer, TJ; Schoenmaeckers, EJ; Buskens, E; Ridwan,
BU; Visser, MR; Nieuwenhuijs, VB; Gooszen, HG. Timing of surgical
Alejandra Guillermina Miranda-Díaz et al.
106
intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg., 2007, 142(12),
1194-1201.
[93] Wondberg, D; Larusson, HJ; Metzger, U; Platz, A; Zingg, U. Treatment
of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted
closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis. World Journal of
Surgery., 2008, 32(12), 2724-2729. Doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9762-y.
[94] Abdo, A; Jani, N; Cunningham, SC. Pancreatic duct disruption and
nonoperative management: the SEALANTS approach. Hepatobiliary
Pancreat Dis Int., 2013, 12(3), 239-243.
[95] Miranda-Díaz, AG; Hermosillo-Sandoval, JM; Gutiérrez-Martínez, CA;
Rodríguez-Carrizalez, AD; Román-Pintos, LM; Cardona-Muñoz, EG;
Pacheco-Moisés, FP; Arias-Carvajal, O. Effect of necrosectomy and
vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) on mitochondrial function and oxidative
stress markers in severe acute pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig., 2014,
106(8), 505-514.

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

Name: Alejandra Guillermina Miranda Díaz
Affiliation: Department Of Physiology, University Health Sciences
Centre, University of Guadalajara (Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la
Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara), Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
Education: MD, FACS, Master in Sc, PhD
Address: Avenida La Paz 2758, Arcos Sur, CP 44150, Guadalajara,
Jalisco México
Research and Professional Experience: General Surgeon, Profesor and
Investigator, Department Of Physiology, University Health Sciences Centre,
University of Guadalajara (Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud,
Universidad de Guadalajara), Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
Professional Appointments: Avenida La Paz 2758, Arcos Sur, CP
44150, Guadalajara, Jalisco México
Honors:
Publications Last 3 Years:
The effect of ubiquinone and combined antioxidant therapy on
oxidative stress markers in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A
phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study.
Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Since the Classical
107
Effects of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and Rosuvastatin on Oxidative
Stress in Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
The antioxidant effect of ubiquinone and combined therapy on
mitochondrial function in blood cells in non-proliferative diabetic
retinopathy: A randomized, double-blind, phase IIa, placebo-
controlled study.
Toll-like receptor-1 and receptor-2 and Beta-defensin in
postcholecystectomy bile duct injury.
Effect of necrosectomy and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) on
mitochondrial function and oxidative stress markers in severe acute
pancreatitis.
Effect of rosuvastatin on diabetic polyneuropathy: a randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIa study.
Effect of botulinum toxin type A in lateral abdominal wall muscles
thickness and length of patients with midline incisional hernia
secondary to open abdomen management.
Oxidants, antioxidants and mitochondrial function in non-proliferative
diabetic retinopathy.
The effect of ubiquinone in diabetic polyneuropathy: a randomized
double-blind placebo-controlled study.
In: Acute Pancreatitis ISBN: 978-1-63485-229-6
Editor: Shane Copeland © 2016 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Chapter 6

MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE

BILIARY PANCREATITIS

Vincenzo Neri, Professor, Dr Med
General Surgery, University of Foggia, Italy

ABSTRACT

Acute pancreatitis is a complex gastrointestinal disease with various
etiology, most frequent biliary and alcoholic (70-80%). Biliary lithiasis
can be considered the most common cause of acute pancreatitis. The
complete diagnostic study should be necessary because etiologic
assessment can be a guide for surgery in the therapeutic program. The
very diversified territorial distribution of the various clinical and
etiological forms of pancreatitis generated uncertainties. In fact in our
experience we can assume the prevalence of biliary etiology with the
pathogenesis based on obstacle in the papillary patency. The etiological
assessment can be a guide in the therapeutic programmes. The biliary
etiology at the initial assessment has been defined by the evaluation of
liver function tests and cholestasis exams and by the research, on
abdominal US, of gallbladder lithiasis, and/or gallstones, sludge,
microlithiasis in the common bile duct. The following diagnostic tools,
MRCP and/or endoscopic US confirmed the biliary origin of pancreatitis.
Acute pancreatitis in the majority of patients (70-80%) present with a
mild-moderate disease that need only fluid rehydratation and abdominal
pain control. On the contrary 20-30% shows a severe curse. Severe acute
pancreatitis can be seen a biphasic disease: first phase (1-2 weeks)
characterized by early toxic-enzymatic action and evolution in SIRS-
Vincenzo Neri
110
MODS; the later phase (3-4 weeks) with septic complications of
pancreatic-peripancreatic fluid necrotic gatherings. Based on this criteria
therapeutic program usually develops in 2 phases. In the severe forms the
therapeutic program has the purpose to control and treat, by intensive
care, the impairment of the general conditions. In particular in the acute
biliary pancreatitis the control of papillary patency and its treatment with
ERCP/ES within 3-4 days is the cornerstone of therapeutic program,
based on the confirmation of papillary obstacle by US/MRCP or if is
present cholestasis or cholangitis. For the treatment of further evolution
of necrotizing pancreatitis there are some specific surgical decisions
based on the following questions:
How long the control and observation of not complicated fluid-
necrotic gatherings may be prolonged?
How to differentiate infected pancreatic necrosis from those sterile?
In some patients with infected necrosis may be delayed the surgical
treatment?
Which is the best surgical approach and its time for the treatment of
the fluid necrotic complicated gatherings?
The surgical procedures showed a progressive evolution to
miniinvasivity: percutaneous drainage, endoscopic drainage,
necrosectomy with minimally invasive step-up approach, endoscopic
transluminal necrosectomy (ETN), videoassisted retroperitoneal
debridment (VARD). About the surgical time there is almost unanimous
consensus to delay the intervention until the fluid necrotic collections are
encapsulated (walled off necrosis).
In conclusion in severe, moderate severe, recurrent acute pancreatitis
with cholestasis-cholangitis, or instrumental confirmation (US/MRCP) of
papillary or CDB obstacle is indicated the therapeutic ERCP/ES within 3-
4 days. In septic necrotic collections the role of the surgery should be
limited to percutaneous drainage (that in most cases could reduce the
needs for surgery). If major surgical interventions are required, these
should be more conservative as possible and preferred minimally invasive
approaches.
Keywords: acute biliary pancreatitis, ERCP/ES, pancreatic gatherings

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas with
systemic response to auto-digestion of the glandular and peri-pancreatic tissue.