Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5971_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
10.10.2026
Размер:
8 Мб
Скачать
☆
3.2 Ecofriendly Sample Preparation Techniques 49
Analytes Matrix Sample volume
Elution solvent
volume References
Cocaine and metabolites Hair
samples
0.15 mL 100 μL 2%
ammonium
hydroxide in MeOH
[70]
Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)
and metabolites
Urine
samples
0.30 mL 100 μL 90% AcN [71]
AcN, acetonitrile; DCM, dichloromethane; H
2
O, water; IPA, isopropanol ammonium hydroxide; MeOH,
methanol; NH
4
OH, ammonium hydroxide.
Table 3.4 (Continued)
This procedure has been employed for different compounds and in numerous matrices
(food, cosmetic, biological, etc.). For example, this technique was successfully applied for
the determination of hormones in environmental and biological samples [72, 73]; benzodi-
azepines (bromazepam, diazepam, lorazepam, and alprazolam) in blood serum [74]; azole
antimicrobial drugs in biological fluids [75]; aromatase inhibitors in whole blood, plasma,
and urine [76]; endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in various biological fluids [77–81];
antidepressant drugs in urine [82] and other biological fluids [83]; antibiotic residues [84,
85] in food and biological samples; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in
saliva samples [86]; β-blocker drugs from human serum and urine [87]; and phenolic com-
pounds in human saliva samples [88].
Locatelli and co-workers [89] presented an advanced application of FPSE as an in vivo sam-
pler for the evaluation of exhaled breath aerosol (EBA). In this work, an array of six mem-
branes (fabric phase sorptive membrane, FPSM) possessing different characteristics (non-polar,
medium-polar, and polar) was built. The FPSM array was then inserted inside the facemask
and 15 volunteers were involved for the sampling. Once removed, a mixture of MeOH and AcN
(150 µL) was used for the elution of extracted compounds. The samples were then analysed
using LC tandem mass spectrometry through rapid screening that permitted the rapid qualita-
tive analysis of more than 700 compounds. This study undoubtedly represents a potential
implementation of biomonitoring of different compounds and its applicability could also be
extended to other fields. Moreover, particular attention was paid to the sustainable profile of
the method, also evaluated through the green analytical procedure index (GAPI) [90]. The
GAPI allows, following the indicated parameters, critical evaluation of the specific compo-
nents of the analytical procedure (solvents, energy consumption, volumes of discharge, etc.);
everything is shown in a pictogram that gives a visual idea of how green the proposed appara-
tus or practice is. The evaluation carried out in this study showed a fairly good green profile.
FPSE represents a novel sample preparation technique that offers numerous benefits such as
ease of application, superior performance, and broad applicability due to the availability of
numerous adsorbents. This technique certainly reflects the principles of GAC, such as the
reduced consumption of organic solvents, the possibility of analysing a complex matrix without
pre-treatment steps, sample volume reduction, and the opportunity to carry out less invasive
sampling. All these advantages are accompanied by excellent analytical parameters, as demon-
strated by the good performance in terms of accuracy and precision in the validated methods.
https://t.me/medicina_free
3 Modern Green Extraction Techniques50
3.3 Solvent-Based Microextraction Procedures
3.3.1 Liquid Phase Microextraction
LLE is a technique that involves the partitioning of analytes from an aqueous phase to a
water-immiscible solvent based on solubility. It was definitely one of the first separation
techniques developed and is among the most generally used. Recently, the diffusion of SPE
techniques and the subsequent miniaturisation have certainly made LLE less widespread.
The time requirement, the low extraction efficiency, the high chemical and solvent con-
sumption, and the high cost are some of its disadvantages. Miniaturisation has been a key
element to overcome some of these limitations, and as a result liquid phase microextraction
(LPME) was launched in the 1990s [91]. LPME uses a few microlitres of a water-immiscible
solvent extraction phase and an aqueous sample phase, which contains the selected ana-
lytes [92]. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), which immediately attracted
scientist attention, involves the rapid addition of a dual system of solvents (extraction sol-
vent and dispersant solvent) that leads to the formation of a turbid mixture in which the
extraction solvent is spread within a type of small droplets. Extraction equilibrium is
reached quickly, thanks to the wide contact area between the droplets and the sample, and
the analytes are extracted. The mixture is thus centrifuged to collect the organic solvent in
the lower or upper part (depending on the density of the extraction solvent) and the trans-
ferred phase is collected for instrumental analysis. Another improvement in DLLME was
the application of ionic liquids (ILs) as alternative solvents. This technique, named
IL-DLLME, avoiding the use of toxic solvents, is considered environmentally sustainable.
ILs are considered further in the next section.
3.3.2 Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents
The search for more sustainable solvents and reagents has become the new challenge of the
entire analytical procedure. In this context, new solvents have been proposed that contrib-
ute to greening analytical practices.
ILs are composed entirely of ions and include numerous compounds with particular
characteristics such as minimal volatility, miscibility with both water and organic solvents,
elevated thermal stability, and the absence of inflammability. They are identified as ‘design
solvents’ as it is possible to vary the physical and chemical properties to replace the compo-
nents and make them more suitable to meet the requirements [93]. ILs are considered eco-
friendly solvents because they do not discharge toxic vapours into the surrounding
environment. In contrast, the process of synthesising ILs often involves steps that limit
their green characteristics; therefore, this designation is rather controversial. Research in
this area is gradually moving towards further recyclable and fewer lethal preparations and
advanced techniques, such as microwave irradiation and eco-assisted reactions, which
have significantly expanded the environmental impact of IL synthesis in addition to leading
to higher reaction yields. ILs have been successfully applied in different fields of analytical
chemistry, like chromatography, CE, mass spectrometry, and extraction and (micro)extrac-
tion techniques, as a substitute for conventional reagents. In Table 3.5 some recent applica-
tions and techniques that involve the use of ILs are reported.
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 3.5 Recent applications of ionic liquids (ILs) and deep eutectic solvents (DESs) in sample preparation techniques.
Analytes Matrix IL/DES
Extraction
technique
Instrumental
analysis References
Resmethrin
Bifenthrin
Fenpropathrin
Cyhalothrin
Water samples 1-Vinyl-3-butylimidazolium
bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-imide
MSPE GC–MS [96]
Ampicillin
Benzylpenicillin
Amoxicillin
Oxacillin
Cloxacillin
Milk samples [DABCO–C
3
OH]Cl or
1-(3-Hydroxypropyl)−1,4-
diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-1-ium chloride
MSPE UPLC–MS/MS [97]
Docosahexaenoic
Eicosapentaenoic
Arachidonic acid
Breast milk [SiO
2
-MIM-BF
4
] or SiO
2
-1-
Methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate
SPE ELSD–HPLC [98]
Pioglitazone Drug samples 1-Hexyl-3-methyl-imidazolium-
hexafluorophosphate
DLLME HPLC–UV [99]
Fipronil
Metalaxyl Paclobutrazol
Myclobutanil
Napropamide
Thiacloprid Penconazole
Food samples Proline/propylene glycol (1 : 3) MSPE HPLC–UV [100]
Diflubenzuron
Triflumuron
Hexaflumuron
Flufenoxuron Chlorfluazuron
Tea and fruit
juices
Trihexyl tetradecyl phosphonium
chloride/tetradecyl alcohol
UA–
DLLME
HPLC–UV [101]
Oxytetracycline Doxycycline
Tetracycline
Water samples Choline chloride : ethylene glycol/
thymol : octanoic acid
DLLME HPLC–UV [102]
(Continued)
Analytes Matrix IL/DES
Extraction
technique
Instrumental
analysis References
Salicylic acid
Oxaprozin
Diclofenac
Ibuprofen
Environmental
water and milk
samples
Guanidinium chloride and thymol UA–
DLLME
HPLC–UV [103]
Pesticides Tomato samples Choline chloride/ethylene glycol (1.25
mL) and choline chloride/n-butyric acid
(58 μL)
SBSE GC–MS [104]
Phthalate esters Soft drinks Thymol/octanoic acid VA–
DLLME
UHPLC–MS/
MS
[105]
Phthalic acid esters Tap and mineral
water
Menthol/acetic acid DLLME LC–UV [106]
Terpenes Spices Tetrabutylammonium bromide/
dodecanol
HS–
SDME
GC–MS [107]
Organophosphorus Water samples Benzyltriphenylphosphonim
bromide/1-undecanol
AA–
LPME
GC–MS [108]
Pb (II)
Cd (II)
Vegetables Citric acid/sucrose HI–DES–
ME
FAAS [109]
Ketoprofen
Diclofenac
Liver Menthol/formic acid EA–
DLLME
LC–MS/MS [110]
AA–LPME, atomic absorption liquid phase microextraction; Cd, cadmium; DLLME, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; EA–DLLME, effervescent-
assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; ELSD–HPLC, evaporative light scattering detection–high-performance liquid chromatography; FAAS, flame
atomic absorption spectrometry; GC–MS, gas chromatography mass spectrometry; HI–DES–ME, heat-induced deep eutectic solvent microextraction; HPLC–
UV, high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet detection; HS–SDME, headspace single-drop microextraction; LC–MS/MS, liquid chromatography
tandem mass spectrometry; LC–UV, liquid chromatography ultraviolet detection; MSPE, magnetic solid phase extraction; Pb, lead; SBSE, stir bar sorptive
extraction; SPE, solid phase extraction; UA–DLLME, ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; UHPLC–MS/MS, ultra-high performance
liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; UPLC–MS/MS, ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; VA–DLLME,
vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction.
Table 3.5 (Continued)
References 53
Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were introduced originally in 2001 as a change from the
traditionally used organic solvents [94]. DESs could be considered a category of ILs, as they
share many characteristics and properties (low vapour pressure, non-flammability, non-
reactivity to water), but they cannot be considered true ILs as they are not totally composed
of ions. DESs are systems formed by a eutectic mixture of Lewis or Bransted acids and bases
that may contain a diffusion of anionic and/or cationic species. They are usually obtained
by complexing a quaternary ammonium salt with a metal salt or chemical bond donor [95].
In addition, the preparatory phase is considered more environmentally friendly than that of
ILs, and they are also easily biodegradable and recyclable, which makes them valid solvents
for use in sustainable analytical procedures. DESs are often divided into four categories:
DES types I, II, and IV are composed primarily of a metal salt (metal chloride hydrate) and
organic salts or other neutral compounds. DES type III consists primarily of an organic salt
as acceptor and hydrogen donor. Similar to DES are natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES),
which are formulated using natural elements generated by cellular metabolism (urea,
amino acids, sugars, choline, etc.). Several articles on analytical processes based on LLE and
SPE applying DES have been published and the most recent are summarised in Table 3.5.
3.4 Conclusion
The determination/quantification of compounds in complex matrices inevitably involves a
preparation phase whose primary objective is the isolation and concentration of analytes. This
preliminary phase also aims to obtain a clean sample appropriate for subsequent instrumental
analysis. Over the years, these preparation techniques have increasingly been oriented
towards simplification, automation, and the reduction of waste. Over time, several ecofriendly
methodologies have been introduced in the preparation step, including microextraction tech-
niques that use new and greener adsorbent materials or the use of alternative green solvents.
Sustainable development has now become the focus of every area, and this concept, extended
to analytical chemistry with the introduction of the principles of GAC, is continually growing.
In the near future, new extraction techniques are expected to be increasingly ecofriendly,
leading to laboratory procedures that have as little impact on the environment as possible.
References
1 Dugheri, S., Marrubini, G., Mucci, N. et al. (2021). A review of micro-solid-phase
extraction techniques and devices applied in sample pretreatment coupled with
chromatographic analysis. Acta Chromatographica 33: 99–111. https://doi.
org/10.1556/1326.2020.00790.
2 D’Ovidio, C., Bonelli, M., Rosato, E. et al. (2022). Novel applications of microextraction
techniques focused on biological and forensic analyses. Separations 9: 1–33. https://doi.
org/10.3390/separations9010018.
3 Jiménez-Skrzypek, G., Ortega-Zamora, C., González-Sálam, J., and Hernández-Borges, J.
(2021). Miniaturized green sample preparation approaches for pharmaceutical analysis.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 207: 114405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jpba.2021.114405.
https://t.me/medicina_free
3 Modern Green Extraction Techniques54
4 Anastas, P.T., and Warner, J.C. (1998). Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
5
Gałuszka, A., Migaszewski, Z., and Namiesnik, J. (2013). The 12 principles of green
analytical chemistry and the significance mnemonic of green analytical practices. Trends
in Analytical Chemistry 50: 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2013.04.010.
6
Aly, A.A., and Górecki, T. (2020). Green approaches to sample preparation based on
extraction techniques. Molecules 25: 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071719.
7
Trenholm, R.A., Vanderford, B.J., and Snyder, S.A. (2009). On-line solid phase extraction
LC–MS/MS analysis of pharmaceutical indicators in water: a green alternative to
conventional methods. Talanta 79: 1425–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2009.06.006.
8
da Silva, L.C., Souza, M.C., Sumere, B.R. et al. (2020). Simultaneous extraction and
separation of bioactive compounds from apple pomace using pressurized liquids coupled
on-line with solid-phase extraction. Food Chemistry 318: 126450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
foodchem.2020.126450.
9 Shirani, M., Salari, F., Habibollahi, S., and Akbari, A. (2020). Needle hub in-syringe solid
phase extraction based a novel functionalized biopolyamide for simultaneous green
separation/preconcentration and determination of cobalt, nickel, and chromium (III) in
food and environmental samples with micro sampling flame atomic absorption
spectrometry. Microchemical Journal 152: 104340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
microc.2019.104340.
10
Khan, W.A., Arain, M.B., and Soylak, M. (2020). Nanomaterials-based solid phase
extraction and solid phase microextraction for heavy metals food toxicity. Food and
Chemical Toxicology 145: 111704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111704.
11
Shi, Z., Li, Q., Xu, D. et al. (2016). Graphene-based pipette tip solid-phase extraction with
ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry for the
analysis of carbamate pesticide residues in fruit juice. Journal of Separation Science 39:
4391–4397. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201600498.
12 Jiang, H.L., Li, N., Cui, L. et al. (2019). Recent application of magnetic solid phase
extraction for food safety analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 120: 115632.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115632.
13 Lian, L.L., Zhang, X.Y., Hao, J. et al. (2018). Magnetic solid-phase extraction of
fluoroquinolones from water samples using titanium-based metal-organic framework
functionalized magnetic microspheres. Journal of Chromatography A 1579: 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.10.019.
14 Li, W.K., Zhang, H.X., and Shi, Y.P. (2018). Simultaneous determination of bifenox,
dichlobenil and diclofop methyl by hollow carbon nanospheres enhanced magnetic
carboxylic multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Analytica Chimica Acta 1011: 40–49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.030.
15 Yu, X., and Yang, H.S. (2017). Pyrethroid residue determination in organic and
conventional vegetables using liquid-solid extraction coupled with magnetic solid phase
extraction based on polystyrene-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Food Chemistry 217:
303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.115.
16 Xia, L., Liu, L.J., Lv, X.X. et al. (2017). Towards the determination of sulfonamides in meat
samples: a magnetic and mesoporous metal-organic framework as an efficient sorbent for
https://t.me/medicina_free
References 55
magnetic solid phase extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography.
Journal of Chromatography A 1500: 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.04.004.
17
Tolmacheva, V.V., Apyari, V.V., Furletov, A.A. et al. (2016). Facile synthesis of magnetic
hypercrosslinked polystyrene and its application in the magnetic solid-phase extraction of
sulfonamides from water and milk samples before their HPLC determination. Talanta
152: 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.02.010.
18
Mohd, N.I., Gopal, K., Raoov, M. et al. (2019). Evaluation of a magnetic activated charcoal
modified with non-ionic silicone surfactant as a new magnetic solid phase extraction
sorbent with triazine herbicides as model compounds in selected milk and rice samples.
Talanta 196: 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.043.
19
Liang, L., Wang, X.H., Sung, Y. et al. (2018). Magnetic solid-phase extraction of triazine
herbicides from rices using metal-organic framework MIL-101(Cr) functionalized
magnetic particles. Talanta 179: 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.11.017.
20
Chen, J.Y., Cao, S.R., Zhu, M. et al. (2018). Fabrication of a high selectivity magnetic solid
phase extraction adsorbent based on β-cyclodextrin and application for recognition of plant
growth regulators. Journal of Chromatography A 1547: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
chroma.2018.03.004.
21 Pang, Y.C., Zang, X.H., Wang, M.T. et al. (2018). Fibrous boron nitride nanocomposite for
magnetic solid phase extraction of ten pesticides prior to the quantitation by gas
chromatography. Microchimica Acta 185: 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00604-018-3103-0.
22
Targhoo, A., Amiri, A., and Baghayeri, M. (2018). Magnetic nanoparticles coated with
poly(p-phenylenediamine-co-thiophene) as a sorbent for preconcentration of
organophosphorus pesticides. Microchimica Acta 185: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00604-017-2560-1.
23 Wang, J.T., Jiao, C.N., Li, M.H. et al. (2018). Porphyrin based porous organic polymer
modified with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for the enrichment of
benzoylurea insecticides. Microchimica Acta 185: 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00604-017-2542-3.
24 Azam, S., and Amjad, M. (2015). Magnetic Fe3O4@C nanoparticles modified with
1-(2-thiazolylazo)-2-naphthol as a novel solid-phase extraction sorbent for
preconcentration of copper (II). Microchimica Acta 182: 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00604-014-1327-1.
25 Habila, M.A., Alothman, Z.A., El-Toni, A.M. et al. (2017). Carbon-coated Fe3O4
nanoparticles with surface amido groups for magnetic solid phase extraction of Cr(III),
Co(II), Cd(II), Zn(II) and Pb(II) prior to their quantitation by ICP-MS. Microchimica Acta
184: 2645–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2283-3.
26 Huang, Y.F., Peng, J.H., and Huang, X.J. (2019). Allylthiourea functionalized magnetic
adsorbent for the extraction of cadmium, copper and lead ions prior to their determination
by atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchimica Acta 186: 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00604-018-3101-2.
27 Özdemir, S., Yalcin, M.S., Kilinc, E., and Soylak, M. (2018). Boletus edulis loaded with
γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles as a magnetic sorbent for preconcentration of Co(II) and Sn(II)
prior to their determination by ICP-OES. Microchimica Acta 185: 73–79. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00604-017-2605-5.
https://t.me/medicina_free
3 Modern Green Extraction Techniques56
28 Narimani-Sabegh, S., and Noroozian, E. (2019). Magnetic solid-phase extraction and
determination of ultra-trace amounts of antimony in aqueous solutions using maghemite
nanoparticles. Food Chemistry 287: 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.112.
29 Barreto, I.S., Andrade, S.I.E., Cunha, F.A.S. et al. (2018). A robotic magnetic nanoparticle
solid phase extraction system coupled to flow-bath analyzer and GFAAS for determination
of trace cadmium in edible oils without external pretreatment. Talanta 178: 384–391.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.09.063.
30
Zhu, S.Q., Chen, B.B., He, M. et al. (2017). Speciation of mercury in water and fish samples
by HPLC-ICP-MS after magnetic solid phase extraction. Talanta 171: 213–219. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.04.068.
31
Özdemir, S., Mohamedsaid, S.A., Kılınç, E., and Soylak, M. (2019). Magnetic solid phase
extractions of Co(II) and Hg(II) by using magnetized C. micaceus from water and food
samples. Food Chemistry 271: 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.067.
32
Mehdinia, A., Ramezain, M., and Jabbari, A. (2017). Preconcentration and determination
of lead ions in fish and mollusk tissues by nanocomposite of Fe3O4@graphene oxide@
polyimide as a solid phase extraction sorbent. Food Chemistry 237: 1112–1117. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.051.
33 Mashkani, M., Mehdinia, A., Jabbari, A. et al. (2018). Preconcentration and extraction of
lead ions in vegetable and water samples by N-doped carbon quantum dot conjugated
with Fe3O4 as a green and facial adsorbent. Food Chemistry 239: 1019–1026. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.042.
34 Deng, Z.H., Wang, X., Wang, X.L. et al. (2019). A core-shell structured magnetic covalent
organic framework (type Fe3O4@COF) as a sorbent for solid-phase extraction of
endocrine-disrupting phenols prior to their quantitation by HPLC. Microchimica Acta
186: 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-3198-3.
35 Pastor-Belda, M., Vinas, P., Campillo, N., and Hernandez-Cordoba, M. (2017). Magnetic
solid phase extraction with CoFe2O4/oleic acid nanoparticles coupled to gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of alkylphenols in baby foods.
Food Chemistry 221: 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.035.
36
Vinas, P., Pastor-Belda, M., Torres, A. et al. (2016). Use of oleic acid nanoparticles for the
magnetic solid-phase microextraction of alkyphenols in fruit juices using liquid
chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 151: 217–233. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.01.039.
37 Billiard, K.M., Dershem, A.R., and Gionfriddo, E. (2020). Implementing green analytical
methodologies using solid-phase microextraction: a review. Molecules 25: 5297–5310.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225297.
38 Arthur, C.L., and Pawliszyn, J. (1990). Solid phase microextraction with thermal
desorption using fused silica optical fibers. Analytical Chemistry 62: 2145–2214. https://
doi.org/10.1021/ac00218a019.
39 Spietelun, A., Marcinkowski, L., de la Guardia, M., and Namiesnik, J. (2013). Recent
developments and future trends in solid phase microextraction techniques towards green
analytical chemistry. Journal of Chromatography A 1321: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
chroma.2013.10.030.
40 Souza-Silva, E.A., Lopez-Avila, V., and Pawliszyn, J. (2013). Fast and robust direct
immersion solid phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography–time-of-flight
https://t.me/medicina_free
References 57
mass spectrometry method employing a matrix compatible fiber for determination of
triazole fungicides in fruits. Journal of Chromatography A 1313: 139–146. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.07.071.
41
Piri-Moghadam, H., Gionfriddo, E., Rodriguez-Lafuente, A. et al. (2017). Inter-laboratory
validation of a thin film microextraction technique for determination of pesticides in surface
water samples. Analytica Chimica Acta 964: 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.02.014.
42 Zhang, L., Gionfriddo, E., Acquaro, V., Jr., and Pawliszyn, J. (2018). Direct immersion
solid-phase microextraction analysis of multi-class contaminants in edible seaweeds by
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta 1031: 83–97. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.066.
43
Pacheco-Fernandez, I., Rentero, M., Ayala, J.H. et al. (2020). Green solid-phase
microextraction fiber coating based on the metalorganic framework CIM-80(Al):
analytical performance evaluation in direct immersion and headspace using gas
chromatography and mass spectrometry for the analysis of water, urine and brewed
coffee. Analytica Chimica Acta 1133: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.08.009.
44 Gionfriddo, E., Boyacı, E., and Pawliszyn, J. (2017). New generation of solid-phase
microextraction coatings for complementary separation approaches: a step toward
comprehensive metabolomics and multiresidue analyses in complex matrices. Analytical
Chemistry 89: 4046–4054. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04690.
45 Orazbayeva, D., Koziel, J.A., Trujillo-Rodríguez, M.J. et al. (2020). Polymeric ionic liquid
sorbent coatings in headspace solid-phase microextraction: a green sample preparation
technique for the determination of pesticides in soil. Microchemical Journal 157: 104996.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.104996.
46 Ghorbani, M., Pedramrad, T., Aghamohammadhasan, M. et al. (2019). Simultaneous
clean-up and determination of Cu(II), Pb(II) and Cr(III) in real water and food samples
using a magnetic dispersive solid phase microextraction and differential pulse
voltammetry with a green and novel modified glassy carbon electrode. Microchemical
Journal 147: 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.03.072.
47 Nasrollahi, S.S., Yamini, Y., and Mani-Varnosfaderani, A. (2022). A green approach for
in-tube solid phase microextraction of acidic red dyes from juice samples using chitosan/
poly vinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibers. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
106: 104339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104339.
48 Alsenedi, K.A., and Morrison, C. (2018). Determination of amphetamine-type stimulants
(ATSs) and synthetic cathinones in urine using solid phase micro-extraction fibre tips and
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytical Methods 10: 1431–1440. https://doi.
org/10.1039/c8ay00041g.
49
Harati, F., Ghiasvanda, A., Dalvand, K., and Haddad, P.R. (2020). Fused-silica capillary
internally modified with nanostructured octadecyl silica for dynamic in-tube solid-phase
microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aqueous media. Microchemical
Journal 155: 104672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.104672.
50 Chen, T., and Xu, H. (2019). In vivo investigation of pesticide residues in garlic using solid
phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta
1090: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.09.011.
51 Tasmia, J., and Shah, M.R.J. (2020). Eco-friendly alginate encapsulated magnetic graphene
oxide beads for solid phase microextraction of endocrine disrupting compounds from
https://t.me/medicina_free
3 Modern Green Extraction Techniques58
water samples. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 190: 110099. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110099.
52
Xu, S., Li, H., Wu, H. et al. (2020). A facile cooling-assisted solid-phase microextraction
device for solvent-free sampling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil based on
matrix solid-phase dispersion technique. Analytica Chimica Acta 1115: 7–15. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.aca.2020.04.019.
53
Tungkijanansin, N., Alahmad, W., Nhujak, T., and Varanusupakul, P. (2020). Simultaneous
determination of benzoic acid, sorbic acid, and propionic acid in fermented food by
headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by GC-FID. Food Chemistry 329: 127161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127161.
54
Omarova, A., Baizhan, A., Baimatova, N. et al. (2021). New in situ solvothermally
synthesized metal-organic framework MOF-199 coating for solid-phase microextraction of
volatile organic compounds from air samples. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 328:
111493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111493.
55 Moein, M.M., Abdel-Rehim, A., and Abdel-Rehim, M. (2015). Microextraction by packed
sorbent (MEPS). Trends in Analytical Chemistry 67: 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
trac.2014.12.003.
56
Filippou, O., Bitas, D., and Samanidou, V. (2017). Green approaches in sample preparation
of bioanalytical samples prior to chromatographic analysis. Journal of Chromatography B
1043: 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.08.040.
57
Kabir, A., Locatelli, M., and Ulusoy, H.I. (2017). Recent trends in microextraction
techniques employed in analytical and bioanalytical sample preparation. Separations
4: 36–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations4040036.
58 Rasolzadeh, F., Hashemi, P., Haghjou, M.M., and Safdarian, M. (2019). Chlorella vulgaris
microalgae as a green packing for the microextraction by packed sorbent of nitrofurantoin
in urine. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Research 6: 419–429. https://doi.
org/10.22036/ABCR.2019.164580.1297.
59 Florez, D.H.A., de Oliveira, H.L., and Borges, K.B. (2020). Polythiophene as highly
efficient sorbent for microextraction in packed sorbent for determination of steroids from
bovine milk samples. Microchemical Journal 153: 104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
microc.2019.104521.
60 Campestre, C., Locatelli, M., Guglielmi, P. et al. (2017). Analysis of imidazoles and triazoles
in biological samples after MicroExtraction by packed sorbent. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition
and Medicinal Chemistry 32: 1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2017.1354858.
61 Rosado, T., Gallardo, E., Vieira, D.N., and Barroso, M. (2020). Microextraction by packed
sorbent as a novel strategy for sample clean-up in the determination of methadone and
EDDP in hair. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 44: 840–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/
bkaa040.
62 Ares-Fuentes, A.M., Lorenzo, R.A., Fernández, P., and Carro, A.M. (2021). An analytical
strategy for designer benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics determination in plasma samples
using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry after
microextraction by packed sorbent. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
194: 113779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113779.
63 Khesinaa, Z.B., Iartseva, S.D., Revelsky, A.I., and Buryaka, A.K. (2021). Microextraction by
packed sorbent optimized by statistical design of experiment as an approach to increase
https://t.me/medicina_free