Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_151_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆
Unraveling the Esophageal Cancer Tumor
https://t.me/med1917
Microenvironment: Insights and Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategies
Inamu Rashid Khan, Faizyana Ali, Sheema Hashem, Alanoud Abdulla, Sabah Nisar, Tariq Masoodi, Ammira S. Al-Shabeeb Akil, Ajaz A. Bhat, and Muzafar A. Macha
Abstract
Esophageal cancer remains one of the most challenging cancers to treat, with a
poor prognosis due to factors such as late detection, high mortality rate, and
aggressive nature. This makes it a significant global health concern. The devel-
opment of esophageal squamous cell carci noma has been linked to genes like p53
and Rb, which regulate the cell cycle. Harmful mutations in these genes lead to
uncontrolled cell division and cancer progression. The tumor microenvironment
Authors Inamu Rashid Khan and Faizyana Ali have contributed equally to this work.
I. R. Khan Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal, Jammu & Kashmir, India
F. Ali Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
S. Hashem Department of Human Genetics, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
A. Abdulla · A. S. Al-Shabeeb Akil · A. A. Bhat ( Department of Human Genetics-Precision Medicine in Diabetes, Obesity and Cancer Program, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar e-mail: abhat@sidra.org
S. Nisar St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
T. Masoodi Human Immunology Department, Research Branch, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
M. A. Macha ( Watson-Crick Centre for Molecular Medicine, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Kashmir, India e-mail: muzafar.macha@iust.ac.in
✉)
✉)
#
The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Interdisciplinary Cancer Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/16833_2023_172 Published online: 2 August 2023
215
216 I. R. Khan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
of esophageal cancer contains various innate immune cells, including natural killer cells, tumor-associated macrophages, dendritic cells, myeloid-derived sup­pressor cells, neutrophils, and mast cells. These cells, along with other diverse cell populations within the tumor microenvironment, inhibit cell death, and promote blood vessel formation, invasion, and metastasis. Immunological checkpoints, secreted chemicals, and immune cells with negative effects all contribute to the ability of esophageal cancer cells to resist the immune system and suppress antitumor immunity. Understanding how the tumor microenviron­ment evolves in different esophageal cancer subtypes and recognizing the similarities and differences among tumor microenvironments in various cancer types are critical for developing targeted therapies in the future. Cancer immuno­therapy represents a potentially new treatment approach for esophageal cancer. Recently, checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed cell death protein 1, programmed death-ligand 1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 have been proposed as strategies to enhance tumor cell destruction and restore T-cell activity in esophageal cancer specifically. To improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy and develop innovative methods for prognos tic prediction or treatment, comprehensive knowledge of the immunological landscapes within esophageal cancer is essential.
Keywords
Angiogenesis · Checkpoint inhibitors · Esophageal cancer · Immunotherapy · Innate immune cells · Prognostic prediction · Tumor microenvironment
Abbreviations
APC Antigen-presenting cells BE Barret’ s esophagus CAFs Cancer-associated fibroblasts CRT Radiation therapy CTLA-4 Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 DCs Dendritic cells EAC Esophageal adenocarcinoma EC Esophageal cancer ESCC Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma GERD Gastroesophageal reflux disease HGF Hepatocyte growth factor MCs Mast cells MDSCs Myeloid-derived suppressor cells NK cells Natural killer cells ORR Objective response rates PD-1 As programmed cell death protein 1 PD-L1 Programmed death-ligand 1
Unraveling the Esophageal Cancer Tumor Microenvironment: Insights... 217
https://t.me/med1917
TAMs Tumor-associated macrophages TAPs Tumor-associated platelets Th17 cells T helper 17 cells TIM-3 T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-3 TLRs Toll-like receptors TME Tumor microenvironment
1 Introduction
Esophageal cancer (EC) is the most lethal and aggressive among all gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. With an annual incidence of 572,000 and 47,000 and 509,000 and 42,000 deaths, EC is the sixth and fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and in India, respectively (Bray et al. 2018; Siegel et al. 2018). Among many states of India, Kashmir has the third highest incidence of EC in the world (Khuroo et al. 1992; Mir and Dar 2009; Wani et al. 2014). Despite significant advances in surgery and chemotherapy (CT) (Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, 5FU, Cis­platin) or targeted therapy (TT) (anti-EGFR) based chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), EC is still characterized by poor prognosis and low survival rates (5-year survival is 15–20%) (Pennathur et al. 2013), primarily due to an advanced stage of cancer at the time of detection, loco-regional/distant metastasis and failure to the currently available CRT’s. This poor response includes inherited and acquired resi stance to the CRT/TT treatment and associated severe toxicities resulting in significant co-morbidities (Rivelli et al. 2015). Differential response levels to chemotherapeutic drugs and other treatment regimens further exacerbate the problem. A complete understanding of the underlying pathology of EC might help us overcome the inadequate therapeutic response and help identify novel therapeutic strategies with minimal inherent or acquired resistance. Moreover, identifying prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers is necessary, including a panel of serum, surface, and genetic markers which can help both to identify the type and stage of cancer and provide a way to generate immune detection in immunotherapeutic systems (Huang and Fu
2019). Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarci-
noma (EAC) are the two primary forms of EC, which vary in their origin and clinical characteristics. While the ESCC develops from the stratified squamous epithelial lining of the organ, EAC develops from the columnar glandular cells of the epithe­lium. ESCC is one of the most aggressive types of cancer, frequently showing lymph node metastasis and tumor invasion into adjacent organs, even in the early stages. With respect to location, the incidence rate of EC varies greatly. The incidence of EAC is increasing in Western countries. However, ESCC remains the significant type of cancer in many Asian countries, including India (80%) (Zhang et al. 2012). The major risk factors for the development of both ESCC and EAC includes the consumption of smoking, tobacco chewing (Brooks et al. 2009), alcohol
218 I. R. Khan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
consumption, diet low in zinc (Choi et al. 2018), achalasia for ESCC (Lambert and Hainaut 2007) or obesity, chroni c gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD ) (Zhang et al. 2012; Mansour et al. 2017). In addition, epigenetic factors, inherent genetic predisposition, unique dietary habits, and obesity are the potential causes of EC. Barret’s esophagus (BE), a premalignant condition in which columnar intestinal cells take the place of the lower esophagus’s usual squamous epithelial lining (Spechler 2013; Sh arma 2022), is regarded as a severe chronic GERD with long­term consequences (Jankowski et al. 1999). According to estimates, 2% of the general population is at risk for BE [14], whereas 10% of GERD patients are at risk of developing EC (Spechler 2013). While the incidence of BE is increasing among many countries, including the USA, approximately 0.12–0.5% of people with BE are estimated to develop EAC annually.
Genes that oversee and regulate cell cycle proteins like p53 and Rb play a significant role in the emergence of EC (Niyaz et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2020). Deleterious mutations render these genes ineffective and allow uncontrolled cell division and cancer development (Engeland 2022). Additionally, 76% of ESCC patients have elevated levels of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is usually accompanied by a dismal prognosis. In addition, 78.6% of ESCC patients have alterations or amplifications in pathways for a receptor tyrosine kinase (RAS) and protein kinase B (AKT) that are downstream of the EGFR (Huang and Yu 2018) (Fig. 1).
2 Immune System
The immune system comprises two prim ary parts, including the innate and adaptive immune systems. The innate immune system, which already exists in the body, serves as the initial line of protection and is activated when an antigen enters the body. The adaptive immune system is typically silent but combats microorganisms that escape or outperform innate immunity (Cianci et al. 2019). The innate immune system is made up of immune cells, including pathogen-clearing cells such as T cells, B cells, natural killer cells (NK cells), Langerhans cells, dendritic cells (DC), macrophages, platelets, mast cells (MCs), complement systems and cytokines that are quickly committed to an infection site during the inflammation. Antigen­presenting cells (APC) stimulate the adaptive immune system, including B and T cells with a large complex of antigen receptors, including toll-like receptors (TLRs) and major class II histocompatibility complex (MHC II) molecules involved in identifying pathog ens and presenting antigens respectively. Antigens mounted on the APC cells bind specifically with the receptors on the B and T lymphocyte and promote their proliferation, maturation, and activation (Gaudino and Kumar 2019).
Immunotherapies are the treatment of choice for both early and advanced cancers, including EC. While some tumor cells express immunological checkpoint proteins such as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), lymphocytes express their ligands like programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) that prevent the destruction of the tumor cells by lymphocytes (Kelly 2019). Similarly, a transmembrane receptor cytotoxic
Unraveling the Esophageal Cancer Tumor Microenvironment: Insights... 219
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the EGFR signaling pathway. EGFR activation occurs when a ligand such as EGF binds to EGFR and causes receptor dimerization. The receptor dimerization leads to the auto-phosphorylation of growth factor proteins such as GRB2 and PLCγ, tyrosine kinase JAK, and proto-oncogene Src and adaptor protein SHC, which results in the activation of downstream cell survival pathways such as RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, JAK/STAT, PI3K/mTOR and NF-kB pathways Abbreviations: EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; PLCγ: phospholipase C gamma; JAK: Janus kinase; Src: Src homology 2 domain-containing
T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) on T cells suppress their activation by its ligands (CD80 or CD86) present on the tumor cells (Bhat et al. 2021a, b). Checkpoint inhibitor therapy, a kind of cancer immunotherapy, targets important immune system regulators that cancer cells employ to defend themselves from immune attack. Recently, intriguing alternatives for the targeted treatment have been proposed, including checkpoint inhibitors that target PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA4 (Fig. 2) (Wang et al. 2022).
220 I. R. Khan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 2 Immune checkpoint therapy in EC. T-cells recognize tumor-specific antigens present on the surface of antigen-presenting cells or tumor cells through the TCR. The binding of PD-1 checkpoint protein present on the T cells with the ligand PD-L1 on the tumor cells inactivates the T-cell function resulting in the inhibition of tumor cell killing. CTLA-4 is a receptor on T cells that binds to CD80/86 on antigen-presenting cells and downregulates the immune system. Monoclonal antibodies such as -anti-PD-L1 drugs (Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab) and anti-CTLA4 drugs (Tremelimumab and Ipilimumab) that function as immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used to restore the immune response against EC Abbreviations: EC esophageal cancer, TCR T-cell receptor, PD-1 programmed-cell death protein 1, PD-L1 programmed-death ligand 1, CTLA4 cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4, MHC major histocompatibility complex
3 Immune System-Mediated Esophageal Cancer Initiation
Progression
For decades, identifying and characterizing epigenetic alterations in tumor cells was the main focus of cancer initiation and development. However, these research findings did not translate well from bench to bedside. Recent studies have conclu­sively established the importance of tumor mic roenvironment (TME), particularly the presence of immune cells in the initiation and progression of cancers, including EC (Diao 2020). Immune cells, including NK cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), regulatory T cells (T-regs), DCs, MCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), neutrophils, tumor associated-platelets (TAPs) and associated cytokines and chemokines are present in the EC TME (Cui et al. 2021). Along with these
Unraveling the Esophageal Cancer Tumor Microenvironment: Insights... 221
https://t.me/med1917
immune cells, a variety of other stromal cells including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), neuroendocrine cells, endothelial cells, adipocytes, blood lymphatic vascu­lar cells, and pericytes contribute to immune escape, increasing angiogenesis, invasion & metastasis, therapeutic resistance and therefore promote aggressive tumor behavior (Bhat et al. 2021a, b; Cui et al. 2021). During the early stages of tumor formation, the presence of neo-antigens and tumor-associated antigens trigger DC-mediated activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, immunological checkpoints, and tumor cell-released substances negatively regulate immune cells and decrease antitumor immunity. The following are distinct cell types and risk factors linked to the development of EC.
3.1 Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
MDSCs are immune cells in the TME that negatively modulate immunological reactions during inflammation and cancer. Monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) are the two primary subpopulations of MDSCs. The growth of MDSCs in the TME is induced by tumor-derived substances such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (reviewed in Bhat et al.
2021a, b). Inflammation, specifically pro-inflammatory chemicals like IL-1, IL-6,
and prostaglandin E2, as well as other tumor-secreted substances, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulate and increase MDSCs. Many studies have shown that cancer patients with higher MDSCs have a worse prognosis than those with low numbers. Furthermore, elevated MDSC levels have been found in EC patients and are linked to advanced disease. These MDSCs suppress antitumor immunity by several mechanisms, including direct inhibition of NK cell cytotoxic­ity, inhibition of T-cell activation, promoting tumor cell growth, invasion & metas­tasis, and therapeutic resistance (reviewed in Bhat et al. 2021a, b). In addition, by activating T-regs, MDSCs promote immunological suppression and impair T cell­mediated tumor clearance (reviewed in Bhat et al. 2021a, b). The majority of the enzymatic activity necessary for MDSCs to inhibit T-cell proliferation and activation is provided by arginase-1 and inducible nitric oxide synthase-2 (iNOS). While arginine is converted into urea and L-ornithine, arginase-1 depletes arginine from T cells, lowering the expression of the CD3ζ chain and impairing T cells’ ability to respond to activating signals (Rodriguez et al. 2003). Recent research has demonstrated that M-MDSCs produced by extracellular vesicles generated from melanoma might predict immunotherapy resistance (Zhao et al. 2021). Similarly, M-MDSCs and PMN-MDSCs also showcase various strategies for controlling the development of tumors. Even though PMN-MDSCs are more common in tumors, M-MDSCs exhibit more potent suppressive properties (Marvel and Gabrilovich
2015).
222 I. R. Khan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
3.2 Regulatory T Cells
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a very small subpopulation of T cells that suppress the exaggerated immunological response to maintain homeostasis and self-tolerance (Kondĕlková et al. 2010). In healthy physiology, Tregs are also known to regulate
+
CD4
and CD8+T cells, macrophages, B cells, NK cells, and DCs. However, they also suppress antitumor immune response as well. Tregs play a major role during tumorigenesis by suppressing inflammation and attenuating antitum or immunity by releasing immunosuppressive cytokines, interfering with the presentation of tumor­associated anti gens, cytotoxic cell activity, and granule release inhibition (Vignali et al. 2008; Lab ani-Motlagh et al. 2020). However, the depletion of Tregs promotes tumor antigen-specific immunity and rejection of endogenous immune-mediated malignancies, highlighting the importance of Treg cells for antitumor immunity (Fietta et al. 2009). Therefore, modulation of Tregs represents a novel cancer therapeutic opportunity. CCL17 and CCL22 produced by tumor cells & macrophages activate C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) and attract Tregs recruit­ment to the EC microenvironment. While the Treg infiltration is associated with deeper tumor invasion, metastasis, overall disease severity, and shorter post­chemotherapy survival, immunotherapy and CTLA4 inhibition were more effective in Treg-depleted patients than non-depleted patients (Fietta et al. 2009). Among the many suppression functions of Tregs, those essential for preserving self-tolerance (i.e., the systems whose deficiency results in autoimmune illness) greatly affect tumor immunity. Surprisingly, the Foxp3 transcription factor regulates a few down­stream molecules, including IL-2 receptor subunits (CD122, CD25) and CTLA-4, and their absence abolishes Treg-suppressive action but promotes autoimmune disorders (Sakaguchi et al. 2008). In addition, Foxp3 interacts with transcription factors (NFAT and AML1) and inhibits IL-2 synthesis (Ono et al. 2007), thereby making Tregs dependent on activated conventional T cells (Tconv) for IL-2 (Fig. 3).
3.3 T Helper 17 Cells
T helper 17 (Th17) cells, a small subpopulation of pro-inflammatory T-helper cells, are known to regulate immunomodulation with both anti-cancer and pro-tumorigenic properties. Upon stimulation by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and IL-6, Th17 cells limit the proliferation of CD8 ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 (Zhang 2018). Through the secretion of cytokines, including IL-17 and IL-22 via STAT3 pathway activation, these Th17 cells promote angiogenesis and accelerate cancer growth (Tesmer et al. 2008). Based on the composition of TNF-, IL-1, IL-6, IL-21, TGF, and IL-23 in the TME (Nam et al. 2008), Th17 cells have been shown to transform into either Tregs or Th1 cells performing a range of contrasting tasks. While both the Tregs and Th17 (CD4+ T cell subtypes) actively contribute to the growth and spread of lung cancers (Marshall et al. 2016), Th17 cells, in part, function as an independent predictor for EC lymph node metastasis and poo r patient prognosis (Chen et al. 2012). In addition
+
T cells by expressing
Unraveling the Esophageal Cancer Tumor Microenvironment: Insights... 223
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 3 Cancer evasion of immune surveillance via TME-mediated cytokines/chemokines. Several chemokines and cytokines secreted by cancer cells block the actions of NK cells, DCs and T cells and attract TAMs. Additionally, MDSCs and Treg T cells are produced by tumour cells, which can further limit T cell activity. PD-L1/2 is expressed by TAMs and tumour cells to prevent T-cell activation by the PD-1 receptor. Collectively, these cells promote tumour development and prolif­eration while suppressing antitumor immunity by various mechanisms
to TME, increased Th17 cells have been reported in the peripheral blood of both EAC and ESCC patients and are associated with the tumor stage (Huang and Fu
2019).
3.4 Tumor-Associated Macrophages
Macrophages involved in innate and adaptive immune responses are crucial cells for tissue homeostasis and protect the body against invading pathogens. Based on the presence of interferons in the microenvironment, macrophages are polarized to either pro-inflammatory M1 or anti-inflamm atory M2 phenotype. M1 macrophages by secreting chemokines/cytokines (IL-12, IL-23, TNF-/CCL-5, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL5) activate Th1 cells and suppress cancer cell proliferation and inhibit survival (Atri et al. 2018). M2 macrophages, on the other hand, release cytokines including IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-10 & TGF-β and are crucial for tissue remodeling, wound healing, angiogenesis, and the development of tumors (Krzyszczyk et al. 2018). In addition, M2 macrophages closely resemble TAMs, are extremely flexible, and adopt a variety of activation states between M1 and M2. They are necessary for the breakdown of the extracellular matrix (ECM), remodeling of the TME and motility of tumor cells, and the induction of angiogenesis. They exhibit markers that are unique to both M1 (IFN-γ, TNFα, MMP-9, CCL2, CCL5,
224 I. R. Khan et al.
https://t.me/med1917
CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL16, IL-12, & IL-23) and M2 (IL-10, TGF-β, arginase-1, PPARγ) (Lin et al. 2019). Specifically to ECs, increased expression of tumor-derived macrophage chemo-attractant protein-1 (MCP1) has been associated with generating angiogenic enzymes such as thymidine phosphorylase, dismal prognosis, and inef­fective treatment in ESCC patients (Shimada et al. 2002).
3.5 Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts
CAFs, characterized by the overexpression of fibrobl ast activation protein-α (FAPα) and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), is a subpopulation of fibroblasts that is preva­lent in the TME of many solid tumors, including ECs. These CAFs are a diverse population of cells that are believed to be originated either from cancer cells, reprogrammed tissue-resident fibroblast, fibrocytes, mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow, epithelial & endothelial cells via epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) (Xing et al. 2010). This phenotype is hypothesized to be produced by cancer-cell-secreted factors such as TGF. In addition, microRNAs secreted by the cancer cells have been shown to transform fibroblasts into CAFs (Savardashtaki et al. 2019). Many malignancies, including EC, are caused by chronic inflammation and injury called non-healing wounds. Fibroblasts and other cells that typically respond to injury are crucial to the development, progression, and eventual dissemi­nation of malignancies via interaction with tumor and other stromal cells through secreted factors that activate pro-inflammatory pathways, impairing immune surveil­lance and altering the ECM (Lin et al. 2016). Using a 3D organotypic cell culture model, it has been shown that the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) produced by activated fibroblasts facilitates invasion by EC cells and promotes resistance to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (Sakaguchi et al. 2008). Using in vivo mouse models, it has been demonstrated that the development of EC was associated with the invasion of MDSCs and activated fibroblasts resulting in a strong desmoplastic response in the tumor stroma (Bhat et al. 2021a, b). A similar increase in tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and motility of cancer cells was observed by CAFs using in vitro models. Furthermore, irradiation induced p120-catenin and HGF upregulated by fibroblasts co-cultured with ESCC cells, reflecting a phenotype that is more intrusive (Baba et al. 2020).
4 Targeted Immunotherapy in EC
Immunotherapy is a biological therapy that enhances the body’s defense mechanisms using substances made by the body or in the lab to enhance, target, or restore immune system function. Immunotherapy is a therapeutic procedure that improves or restores the ability of the immune system to detect and eradicate tumor cells by altering or preventing co-stimulatory cues. Co-stimulatory signals such as PD-1, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) & T-cell immunoglobulin, and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) fine-tunes the