Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2939_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆
Team-Based Care: Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists, andPhysician Assistants
RobertC.Salinas andPeterWinn
Introduction
More than ever before, there is an ongoing national effort to assist older adults attain and maintain their highest functional status and to successfully age in place. With the expansion of telemedicine, remote patient monitoring systems, extended home health care coverage, and emerging home-based primary care models of care, older adults have the possibility to delay nursing home placement [1]. Residents in nurs­ing facilities and assisted living are often the most vulnerable due to multi­morbidities, neurocognitive disorders, and psychosocial issues. The complexity of resident healthcare and social needs coupled with the increased burden on physi­cians to provide care in long-term care has increased the need for collaboration between physicians, the advance nurse practitioners, and physician assistants to provide interdisciplinary/interprofessional team-based care.
Nurse practitioners (NP) are Registered Nurses who have obtained a Master’s degree of nursing (MSN) or a clinical doctoral degree as a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP). The DNP was established to acknowledge their professional parity with pharmacists and physical therapists who have received a clinical doctorate.
R. C. Salinas (*) · P. Winn Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, The University of Oklahoma, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 P. Winn et al. (eds.), Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, Current Clinical Practice, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28628-5_7
93
94
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
R. C. Salinas and P. Winn
Nurse practitioners with a DNP have had additional education and clinical training in quality improvement, leadership, and health policy. Nurse practitioners who practice in nursing facilities are usually designated as a gerontological, adult, adult­gerontological, or family NP.Recently the Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) educa­tion in psychiatric mental health has been changed to that of a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. Nurse practitioners have had greater than 6years of aca- demic and clinical training [2].
Advanced practice nurses, both nurse practitioners (NP) and clinical nurse specialists (CNS) have shown improvement in several measures of health and the behavior of residents in long-term care as well as better family satisfaction [3–5]. The NP and CNS are autonomous and collaborative members of the interdisciplin­ary team who enhance the accessibility and quality of care in nursing facilities, and serve as a resource to the assisted living and nursing facility staff who are chal­lenged by the increasingly complex needs of residents [6].
Currently there are over 355,000 NPs licensed in the USA and an increase in “full-time” NPs from 14% in 2008 to 36% in 2018. NPs now represent 60% of full­time primary care practitioners in the LTC sector [7]. Nurse practitioners are trained to perform patient histories and physical exams, to diagnose and treat acute illness, and to manage chronic conditions; can order and interpret laboratory tests, diagnos­tic reports such as X-rays, Doppler and cardiac studies; are skilled in primary, sec­ondary, and tertiary prevention; may prescribe medication including controlled substances dependent on state regulations; and can provide health teaching, antici­patory guidance, and supportive counseling to patients. As of 2022, there were 24 full practice states with practice and licensure law allowing NPs to evaluate patients, diagnose, order, and interpret diagnostic tests, to initiate and manage treatment, including prescribing medication (under the licensure authority of the state boards of nursing). This full practice model has been recommended by the Institute of Medicine and the National Council of State Boards of Nursing. There are 16 states with reduced practice, meaning the state practice and licensure law reduces the abil- ity of NPs to engage independently in at least one element of NP practice. These reduced practice States require a collaborative agreement with another health disci­pline (usually a physician) in order for the NP to provide patient care. The remaining 11 states have restricted practice (with state practice and licensure laws) that restrict the ability of a NP to engage in at least one element of NP practice. Some States require supervision, delegation or team-management by an outside health entity/ practitioner in order for the NP to provide patient care. Information on which states has which NP category can be found at https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/state/
state- practice- environment.
It is essential when collaborating with a NP or CNS to have a thorough understanding of their scope of practice. The Institute of Medicine report The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health acknowledges that nurses should practice to the full extent of their education, training and scope of practice in order to meet our nation’s health care needs and that nurses be full practice partners with physicians [8].
Team-Based Care: Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists, and Physician…
95
Partnering withaNurse Practitioner Nurse or Physician Assistant
Nurse practitioners can achieve better resident health care goals without an increase in the cost of care. NPs and physician assistants (PAs) who practice in LTC can reduce hospital admissions and costs [6]. The Evercare (program) has shown that nursing facilities having a NP manage a resident’s care, had half the number of hospitalizations than nursing facilities that did not have NP managing the resident’s care. NPs can improve the quality and accessibility of primary health care services to this ever-increasing complex resident population through being approachable and respectful of patient, family, and staff. The nursing staff develops trust with NPs and value their knowledge. Meta-analysis studies and systematic reviews have demon­strated positive results of NP practice in long-term care:
• High patient satisfaction, decreased hospitalizations, and decreased all-cause
mortality compared to physician alone practice.
• Reduced transfers to the emergency department.
• Lower rates of depression, urinary incontinence, pressure ulcers, use of restraints,
and less aggressive behavior in residents.
• Practice with a high degree of collaboration with the interprofessional team.
• Provide leadership activities that include education of the interdisciplinary staff
in quality improvement, evidence-based practice and practice innovation.
Clinical Nurse Specialists
Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS) have a Master’s degree in nursing and often have further specialized training in a particular area of clinical nursing. Though most frequently employed in Magnet hospitals, they can have a signicant positive impact when working in post-acute and long-term care. According to recent statistics, there are 89,000 practicing CNS in the United States [9]. These advanced practice nurses are experts in the diagnosis and treatment of illness, health promotion, and the implementation of evidence-based practice. Through education and consultation with staff, CNS have also been shown to reduce urinary incontinence, pressure ulcers, aggressive behavior, the use of restraints (both physical and pharmacologi­cal), to decrease fall-related injuries, and to improve the effect of cognitively impaired residents. Adult and gerontological CNSs are expanding practice in wound care, quality improvement, and education and leadership roles within long-term care. As noted, psychiatric mental health CNS and NPs are trained in the behavioral management of persons aficted with dementia and others with serious mental illness.
96
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
R. C. Salinas and P. Winn
Physician Assistants
There are over 132,940 physician assistants (PAs) currently working in the USA and their number is expected to continue to increase [10]. In 2013, a national sur­vey by the American Academy of Physician Assistants, reported that 0.9 % of PAs were directly employed by a nursing facility or other long-term care facility. PA training programs are commonly based at medical schools, hospitals, and other health care facilities. Didactic sessions and clinical rotations are often taken along­side medical students, which helps to cultivate a future collaborative relationship between these two professions. The rst year of the 26-month PA program covers the basic medical sciences followed by clinical rotations in all major medical spe­cialties. With over 2000h of clinical and skill training, PAs are well suited to per­form patient histories and physical exams, diagnose, order, interpret test results and manage both acute and chronic conditions, in collaboration with physicians. To be able to practice a PA must pass the Physician Assistant National Certifying Exam (PANCE) and require subsequent continuing education in order to recertify every 10years.
A PA’s scope of practice is dened by four domains: education and experience, state law, facility policy, and the needs of patients. Each is necessary in order to
provide effective patient-centered care. PAs are expected to perform patient care tasks at a similar skill level and competency as a physician. However, State boards do not require a PA to be procient in any specic tasks.
Collaboration does not necessarily require the constant presence of a physician. In fact, in some rural areas a PA can be a patient’s primary care provider with the supervising physician “checking-in” once or twice a week. The PA’s scope of prac­tice continues to grow, adapting to changes within the medical profession and state legislatures. It is imperative that the supervising physicians and the long-term care facility employers be cognizant of changing State regulation.
Prescribing Privileges ofPAs andNPs
A significant difference in prescribing privileges exists between NPs and PAs. Currently all States allow PAs to prescribe as long as a physician is either directly involved or available. Most commonly this association is through del- egation (19 states) and authorization (18 states) with other (13 states) specify­ing that a physician be directly involved in a supervisory role. Only Arizona has
specified collaboration. In contrast, 24 states allow NPs to have prescriptive authority where these States have regulations that allow NPs to diagnose and treat patients independently. The remaining states require varying levels of col-
laboration, delegation, and supervision. Prescribing of scheduled drugs is regu­lated and enforced by individual States through the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) [2].
Team-Based Care: Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists, and Physician…
DEA classication of scheduled drugs
Abuse
Schedule Medical use/effects
I • No medical use
• Research use only
II/IIN • Severe psychic or physical
dependence liability
• Narcotic, stimulant, depressant drugs
III/IIIN • Moderate or low psychical or
physical dependency
IV • Limited psychological or
physical dependency
V • Over the counter or
prescription drugs with limited amounts of narcotics
• Used for analgesic, antitussive, antidiarrheal
potential Examples
Highest Heroin, Marihuana, LSD, MDMA
High Narcotic: Opium, Codeine,
Hydromorphone, Methadone, Hydrocodone Non-narcotic: Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, Nabilone
High Narcotic: Acetaminophen with
Codeine, Buprenorphine Non-narcotic: Ketamine, Anabolic steroids
Low Chlordiazepoxide, Diazepam,
Barbital, Phenobarbital, Clorazepate, Alprazolam
Lowest Buprenorphine, Propylhexedrine
97
Controlled (scheduled) drug prescribing is allowed for PAs in the majority of states through their collaborative practice with physicians. However, 15 states restrict this privilege to schedule III–V drugs. Florida and Kentucky do not allow for any controlled drugs to be prescribed by a PA. All states (except for Florida) allow NPs to prescribe controlled substances: the majority of states allow Schedule II through V; however, eight states restrict this to Schedule III through V.
The registration procedure with the DEA is the same for all Advanced Practitioners and designated as “mid-level practitioners.” Only after successfully
completing all requirements imposed by the State in which they will practice and successfully receive a state license are they then able to apply for a DEA registra­tion. Once approved, they will receive a DEA number beginning with “M.”
There is a signicant lack of PAs who practice in long-term care despite 20% work in primary care. PA programs have shown a propensity for PAs to prefer prac­tice in orthopedics, urgent care, and in-patient care. However, data has shown that PAs have a favorable attitude toward the elderly and would welcome inclusion of a rotation in long-term care during their training.
Collaborative Practice
How and when to develop Collaborative Practice Agreements is beyond the scope of this chapter; however, some general comments are noteworthy. Interprofessional team care has become the gold standard in post-acute and long-term care. Within this
98
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
R. C. Salinas and P. Winn
model of care, team members include physicians, Advanced Practice Nurses (NPs and CNS), and PAs. Currently NP and CNS can work independently (depending upon state regulations), whereas PAs must work in collaboration with a physician. There are six models of care in collaborative NP/ physician practice at nursing facilities: collabo­rator, clinician, care coordinator/manager, coach/educator, counselor, and communi­cator/cheerleader. Combining these models of care can create synergy that positively affects residents, resident families, facilities, and staff. There are at least seven differ- ent forms of collaboration in practice (1) NP hired by a physician; (2) NP and physi­cian both employed by the long-term care setting; (3) NP contracted (self-employed) or employed by an NP practice; (4) NP employed directly by the nursing facility; (5) NP employed by the payer (e.g., Optum); (6) NP in a specialty collaborative practice that includes consulting; and (7) NP in independent practice employs a physician.
It is encouraging to see the progress that has been made in acknowledging the crucial role that advanced practitioners play in the realm of long-term care and geri­atric practice. In 2014, AMDA—The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, House of Delegates, voted to permit full membership to NPs and PAs. This resolution allows NPs and PAs to be elected to Board positions and the House of Delegates and thus contribute their expertise to improving patient care [2, 11–13].
Resources for developing collaborative practice agreements can be found through professional organizations including AMDA—The Society of Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine (www.amda.paltc.org), the Gerontological Advanced Practice Nurses Association (www.gapna.org), the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (www.aanp.org), and American Academy of Physician Assistants (www.aapa.org).
Pearls for the Practitioner
• Nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists are autonomous and collaborative
members of the interprofessional team in both post-acute and long-term care
settings.
• Nurse practitioners’ scope of practice ranges from state to state: full practice,
reduced practice, and restricted practice.
• Physician assistants’ scope of practice is determined by education/training,
experience, state law, and facility policy.
• Prescribing privileges differ between NPs and PAs and from State to State.
• The DEA designates NPs and PAs as “mid-level practitioners.”
• Collaborative practice agreements are often necessary for NPs, CNSs, and PAs.
References
1. Cacchione ZC, Shah R Nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and physician assistants. In: Fenstemacher P, Winn P, editiors. Post-acute and long-term medicine: a pocket guide. 2nd ed. Humana Press. 2016.
2. American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2022 nurse practitioner state practice environment. 2022. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy- resource/position- statements/
scope- of- practice- for- nurse- practitioners. Accessed 26 July 2022.
Team-Based Care: Nurse Practitioners, Clinical Nurse Specialists, and Physician…
3. Bakerjian D.Care of nursing home residents by advanced practice nurses. A review of the literature. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2008;1(3):177–85. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124- 20091301- 01.
4. Bergman-Evans B. Out of the shadows: nurse practitioner leadership in skilled and long-term care facilities. J Gerontol Nurs. 2021;47(8):3–6. https://doi.
org/10.3928/00989134- 20210707- 01.
5. Rantz MJ, Birtley NM, Flesner M, etal. Call to action: APRNs in U.S. nursing homes to improve care and reduce costs. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(6):689–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
outlook.2017.08.011.
6. Katz PR, Ryskina D, Saliba D, etal. Medical care delivery in U.S. nursing homes: current and future practice. Gerontologist. 2021;61(4):595–604. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa141.
7. McGilton KS, Bowers BJ, Resnick B.The future includes nurse practitioner models of care in the long-term care sector. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(2):197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jamda.2021.12.003.
8. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). 2011. Accessed 26 July 2022.
9. Reed SM, Arbet J, Staubli L.Clinical nurse specialists in the United States registered with a national provider identier. Clin Nurse Spec. 2021;35(3):119–28.
10. American Medical Association—Advocacy Resource Center. Physician assistant scope of practice. 2018. https://www.ama- assn.org/sites/ama- assn.org/les/corp/media- browser/public/
arc- public/state- law- physician- assistant- scope- practice.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2022.
11. Pakizegee, M and Stefanacci R.The ever-expanding role of nurse practitioners in LTC.Ann Long-Term Care. 2019. Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
12. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. 2019. National Academies Sciences Engineering Medicine. Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
13. Stucky CH, Brown WJ, Stucky MG. COVID 19: an unprecedented opportunity for nurse practitioners to reform healthcare and advocate for permanent full practice authority. Nurs Forum. 2021;56:222–7.
99
Common Clinical Conditions inPost-Acute
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
andLong-Term Care
NaushiraPandya
Introduction
The management of medical conditions in the frail elderly who reside in post-acute and long-term care facilities (PALTC) can be challenging due to multimorbidity, progressive functional decline, psychosocial issues, and reduced life expectancy. This chapter will review some of the common clinical conditions that frequently occur in patients in the post-acute and LTC continuum. The treatments prescribed and treatment goals often differ from those of patients in other settings, and thus require an approach that balances the risks/benets of treatment guided by clinician discussions with the patient and/or surrogate decision-maker. These conditions will be reviewed in the following order:
• Hypertension
• Heart failure
• COPD
• Diabetes
• Anemia
• Thyroid disorders
• B12 deciency
• Clostridioides difcile infections
• Scabies
• Herpes Zoster
• Acute kidney injury
N. Pandya (*) Department of Geriatrics, Nova Southeastern University, Kiran C Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 P. Winn et al. (eds.), Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, Current Clinical Practice, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28628-5_8
101
102
N. Pandya
Hypertension
The ACC/AHA 2017 [1] guidelines categorize normal BP as <120/<80 and hyper­tension dened as a blood pressure >130/80mmHg (see Table1). Hypertension is the most prevalent and modiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death. The National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES), reported the prevalence of HTN in those >65years to be 63.6% in women and 65.8% in men. In those >75years, the prevalence is 73.4% in women and 81.2% in men. The age­adjusted prevalence is highest in non-Hispanic black men and women. Up to two­thirds of nursing home patients have HTN.In addition to the well-ascribed risk factors for stroke and cardiovascular disease, persons with HTN are also at increased risk for atrial brillation, congestive heart failure (CHF), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cognitive impairment. In older adults, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have been shown to progressively increase as the systolic blood pressure increases.
Although hypertension (HTN) is not a normal part of aging, its prevalence increases steadily with advancing age. Physiologic changes of aging that contribute to elevated blood pressure include increased arterial stiffness, increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system, increased peripheral resistance, and reduced vas­cular compliance and vasodilation. In addition, changes in the renin-angiotensin system and kidney function lead to increased salt sensitivity. Obesity and insulin resistance are also contributing factors. Systolic HTN is highly prevalent, more common than diastolic HTN and more closely related to cardiovascular risk than diastolic HTN.
Table 1 HTN denitions and treatment targets– JNC-8 and 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines [1]
JNC-8 2017 AHA/ACC
Denition of HTN (mmHg) Elevated
BP treatment thresholds (mmHg)
BP targets (mmHg)
Therapy selection
Normal <120/<80 Pre-hypertension:120–139/80–89 Stage 1: 140–159/90–99 Stage 2: >160/>100
≥60years old: >150/90 <60years old with diabetes or CKD: >140/90
>60years old: 150/90 <60years old: 140/90
Non-Black adults, including with DM: rst-line therapy includes ACE inhibitor/ARB, CCB, thiazides (alone or in combination) Black adults, including with DM: rst-line therapy includes thiazides or CCB Adults with CKD: rst-line therapy includes ACE inhibitor/ARB (alone or in combination)
Normal: <120/80 Increased: SBP 120–129 Stage 1: 130–139/80–89 Stage 2: ≥140/≥90
Adults with history of CVD or ASCVD risk >10%: >130/80 Adults without history of CVD and ASCVD risk <10%: >140/90
<130/80 for all
Non-Black adults: rst-line therapy includes thiazides, ACE inhibitor/ ARB, CCB Black adults: rst-line therapy includes thiazides or CCB
Common Clinical Conditions inPost-Acute andLong-Term Care
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
103
In the PALTC setting, blood pressure measurements may not be accurate and may vary with higher readings in the morning before breakfast and drops after meals. Post-prandial hypotension occurrs in one-third of patients and is a risk factor for falls, syncope, stroke, and overall mortality.
Benets andRisks ofTreatment
The benets of treating HTN in the elderly to reduce cardiovascular and cerebrovas­cular morbidity and mortality is well established, even in those >80 years old. However, there is insufcient evidence regarding what is the safest and most bene­cial treatment strategy for frail older adults.
The Cochrane Review on the treatment of essential HTN in elderly patients (15 trials with 24,055 subjects ≥60years) reported a reduction in total mortality (RR
0.90) and a reduction in total cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (RR 0.72). In
very elderly patients ≥80years, the reduction in total cardiovascular mortality and morbidity was similar (RR 0.75). However, there was no reduction in total mortality,
(RR 1.01) [2]. The benet of antihypertensive treatment in patients age 80years and older has also been demonstrated by the Hypertension in the Very Elderly (HYVET) trial in which 3845 healthy community individuals over age 80years with a sus­tained SBP of ≥160mmHg were randomized to indapamide or placebo with the addition of perindopril or placebo to achieve a SBP goal of 150mmHg. However, individuals with immobility, cognitive impairment, and nursing facility residents were excluded from this study. The benets of treatment were apparent at 1year, and further increased at 2years, with a 30% reduction in the incidence of fatal or nonfatal stroke, a 39% reduction in fatal stroke, and a 21% reduction in all-cause mortality [3].
Recently, guidelines for HTN treatment in the elderly have been informed by the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which studied 9361 ambula­tory subjects, mean age 68years with a baseline SBP >130mmHg. Nursing facility residents, and those with Type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and dementia were excluded. Treatment goal of <120mmHg was compared to a goal of 140mmHg and showed a signicant decrease in outcomes for cardiovascular events (HR 0.77), and all­cause mortality (HR 0.73) in the intensive treatment group. Subgroup analysis for those classied as frail or having a slow gait speed, showed similar results. Self­reported syncope was more frequent in the intensive treatment group, but falls and falls with injuries were similar in both groups, even in those >75years. All partici­pants studied in SPRINT-MIND showed a 19% reduction in mild cognitive impair­ment (MCI), but not in probable dementia [4]. However, the PARTAGE [5] study of 1127 nursing home subjects >80 years in Europe showed a signicant relation between SBP <130mmHg and 2 or more BP-lowering medications and a higher risk of mortality (adjusted HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.34–2.37, both p<0.001).
Other prior randomized trials of HTN treatment in the elderly (SHEP: Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program; STOP: Swedish Trial in Old Patients; Sys-Eur: