Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1382_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
130
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
incomplete or debulking procedures, with 37% of patients exhibiting local relapse of disease in the neck postoperatively.
Rates of locoregional recurrence within the tumor bed or in cervical lymph nodes are high after surgical resection alone for UTC. UTC has a clear propensity for metastatic dissemination and locoregional recurrence and is not treatable with radioactive iodine, and for these reasons adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been recommended to maxi­mize the chance of achieving local control and to reduce the risk of distant recurrence [27, 37, 39, 43]. Doxorubicin has been the chemother­apy agent most frequently used in this setting, as monotherapy or in combination with cisplatin, and has been associated with acceptable toxicity [37, 43, 81]. In a study of 33 patients at the University of California, San Francisco, com­plete surgical resection could be performed in eight cases and was followed by adjuvant che­moradiotherapy. The complete resection group had an improved survival compared with incompletely resected or nonresected tumors, with four long-term survivors following com­plete resection [43]. In a smaller series reported by Tan and coworkers, complete resection of the tumor was achieved in five of 21 patients with UTC and was followed by adjuvant che­moradiotherapy, with three of these patients surviving longer than 2 years [37].
In series that report long-term survival after complete surgical resection of UTC, surviving patients received postoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in the majority of cases [22, 27, 37, 39, 42, 43, 82]. Given the aggressive behavior of UTC, adjuvant treatment with che­motherapy and radiotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrent disease following complete resection in patients with small or incidentally found tumors.
Clinical Scenario 2: Extensive Locoregional Disease
Extrathyroidal invasion is present in as many as 82% of UTC, and achieving local control of dis­ease in this setting is difficult [22, 37–39, 41]. In the presence of extensive local invasion of adja­cent structures, such as the trachea, esophagus, and major vascular structures, complete surgi­cal resection is not possible and other treatment
modalities must be used to obtain control of local tumor growth. Extensive or radical resec­tion of the invaded trachea or esophagus with complex reconstruction is rarely indicated due to the high likelihood of local recurrence in the neck or death from disseminated disease. Pro­gressive airway compromise from unchecked local invasion is highly distressing to the patient and is the mode of death in 15% of cases [44]. The aim of treatment in patients with extensive local disease to achieve local control of tumor growth, for the palliation of symptoms and to extend the duration of life where possible.
Multimodality treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been used in the setting of advanced local disease to achieve control of tumor growth. Downsizing of tumor volume in the neck may also enable surgical resection in patients who respond to this treatment. One of the first reports of effective treatment for locally advanced UTC was from Memorial Sloane Ket­tering hospital where radiotherapy was given in combination with doxorubicin for nine patients with UTC, of which only one had complete resection of disease prior to treatment [83]. Complete response to treatment was observed in eight patients, and in six of these responders local control was maintained until death from other causes.
A multimodality treatment protocol devel­oped in Sweden has shown to be effective in the management of locally advanced UTC. The first protocols reported by this group used external beam radiotherapy in combination with bleomycin, 5–fluorouracil, and cyclopho­sphamide [84]. These chemotherapy agents were replaced with doxorubicin in subsequent protocols [85, 86]. Response to this protocol enabled surgical resection to be subsequently performed in 73% of patients, which was macro­scopically complete in 85% of operative cases [86]. Life-threatening complications did not occur, and toxicity did not prevent patients from completing chemoradiotherapy. A reduc­tion in deaths from complications of uncon­trolled local tumor invasion was seen with this treatment protocol, occurring in only 24% of cases [84, 86]. Local recurrence was seen in only 40% of cases, and in only 18% of patients where surgical resection was performed. This strategy was effective in controlling the effects of local tumor growth, but survival was limited by the onset of disseminated disease. Mean
131
POORLY DIFFERENTIATED AND UNDIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER
survival durations of 2–4.5 months were reported in the groups studied, with an overall 1 year survival rate of only 16%. However, long­term survival (>2 years) was seen in 10% of patients [84].
Results of multimodality therapy from other centers confirm a role for this strategy in the management of locally advanced UTC. In a report of 30 patients with UTC from a French group, of which extrathyroidal invasion was present in 26, chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin was combined with radiotherapy and given prior to surgical resection or post­operatively [82]. In seven patients with unre­sectable disease at presentation, tumor response to therapy enabled subsequent complete resec­tion in three cases. In total, surgical resection was performed in 24 cases and was macrosco­pically complete in 12. Complete surgical resec­tion was associated with a significant survival advantage in this setting. A complete local response to therapy was found in 63% of patients. Overall 3-year survival was 27% (med­ian survival 10 months), with 68% of deaths due to complications of metastatic disease and only 5% due to locoregional failure. Seven patients remained disease free at follow up (3-year dis­ease-free survival rate 24%). There was, how­ever, a high rate of toxicity in this study from neutropenia and bone marrow suppression (seen in 70%), limiting its role in the manage­ment of frail or elderly patients.
Newer chemotherapy agents for the systemic treatment of UTC have been studied and asso­ciated with better results from treatment than standard regimes. A phase 2 trial of paclitaxel has been reported which has shown the effec­tiveness of this agent [87]. In this trial of 20 patients with locally advanced or metastatic UTC (including 42% who had previously under­gone surgical resection), response to therapy was observed in 53% of patients and was com­plete in one patient only. The treatment proto­col was well tolerated and associated with an acceptable risk profile. The addition of taxol­based chemotherapy to multimodality treat­ment protocols may improve the long-term results of treatment for UTC.
For patients with extensive locoregional disease, combination chemotherapy and radio­therapy can be effective in controlling local com­plications. In patients who respond to a trial of chemoradiotherapy, a sufficient downsizing of
disease in the neck may enable subsequent sur­gical resection of disease to be performed.
Clinical Scenario 3: Distant Metastatic Disease
Disseminated metastatic disease is present in 43–64% of patients with UTC at the time of first assessment [22, 25, 27, 28, 38, 43]. Where disse­minated disease is present, prognosis is extre­mely poor with very few patients surviving for more than 12 months [22, 25]. Systemic therapy for metastatic disease has a very limited role in the management of metastatic UTC, and the results after treatment with existing chemother­apy regimes remain disappointing [88]. In a report of nine patients undergoing chemother­apy with doxorubicin and bleomycin for meta­static UTC at the University of Padova, clinical response was seen in onlya single patient and the group had a median survival of only 5.7 months [89]. A larger study of chemotherapy for advanced thyroid cancer including 39 patients with UTC comparing monotherapy with doxor­ubicin with combination therapy with doxorubi­cin and cisplatin showed a clinical response in 26% of patients receiving the combined treat­ment, of which half displayed a complete response [90]. Significantly more patients had a complete response to treatment after combina­tion chemotherapy in this study. Combination therapy was however associated with consider­able toxicity, causing life-threatening complica­tions in 12% of patients. Chemotherapy with newer agents such as paclitaxel has been asso­ciated with improvements in clinical response with lower rates of toxicity. In the phase 2 trial of paclitaxel for locally advanced and metastatic UTC, few patients had toxicities more severe than grade 2, and no life-threatening complica­tions were reported [87]. Fifty-three percent of patients exhibited a clinical response to pacli­taxel and had a mean duration of survival of 32 weeks, compared with 10 weeks for nonrespon­ders, although this differencewas not statistically significant.
In patients with UTC where distant metas­tases are present, complications of disseminated disease will be the determinant of survival in most cases, and aggressive multimodality treat­ment with chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection will in most cases not influence
132
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
survival. An exception to this may be where extensive local disease is also present and where external beam radiotherapy and che­motherapy can be given for local control of the tumor mass with palliative intent [84, 86]. The distress of progressive airway compromise and other local complications are considerable, and chemoradiotherapy for local control has been recommended in the setting of disseminated metastatic disease for this reason [84, 86]. Radiotherapy also has a role in the palliation of metastatic disease and can be directed to sites of skeletal or brain metastases for control of local symptoms [91].
Scenario 4: Acute Airway Compromise
Invasion of the larynx or trachea is present in up to 50% of UTC at the time of presentation, and less commonly (18% of cases) UTC can present with symptoms of acute airway obstruction necessitating urgent intervention [38, 39]. In many of these cases, endotracheal intubation is performed as an emergency procedure to achieve control of the airway, allowing subse­quent clinical evaluation of the obstructing mass with appropriate imaging and diagnostic pathology. CT imaging of the neck and medias­tinum can assess the extent of local invasion into the airway and other adjacent vital struc­tures, and can be used to assess the feasibility of surgical debulking or resection in relieving the obstruction (Fig. 9.7). Metastatic disease to mediastinal lymph nodes or the lungs may also be seen. Flexible bronchoscopy and esophago­scopy should be performed to assess whether invasion into the lumen of the airway or eso­phagus has occurred and can be used to obtain biopsy material of the tumor if this is present. FNA biopsy should be performed to confirm UTC and rule out other thyroid malignancies which may be more responsive to treatment. More definitive control of the airway can be achieved by surgical intervention or by the insertion of a tracheal stent. Surgical options for the relief of airway obstruction consist of surgical resection, division of the isthmus, tumor debulking, or by the formation of tra­cheostomy. Complete surgical resection of UTC is rarely possible in the setting of acute airway obstruction due to the advanced nature
a
b
Fig. 9.7. (A) Cross-sectional computed tomography appear-
ance of undifferentiated thyroid cancer arising within a long­standing multinodular goiter in a 58-year-old female. The patient presented with acute airway compromise and distress. Invasion and compression of the trachea and esophagus are demonstrated. (B) Chest radiograph of the patient showing compression and deviation of the trachea (arrow).
of local invasion. Tracheostomy has been per­formed in 7–33% of patients with UTC in pub­lished series and can be technically difficult due the extent and bulk of local disease [37, 38]. In a study of 69 patients who underwent tracheost­omy in the setting of locally advanced thyroid cancer, patients with UTC had a survival rate of only 25% at 3 months [92]. Survival was worse for patients with UTC after tracheostomy com­pared with those who did not undergo this pro­cedure, although this probably represented the selection of more aggressive and advanced malignancies. More recently, the insertion of self-expanding stents under bronchoscopic control to traverse the region of obstruction has
133
POORLY DIFFERENTIATED AND UNDIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER
been performed for longer-term airway control [93–95]. This technique can be combined with balloon dilation of the narrowed segment and laser ablation of invasive intraluminal disease, and has been successful in achieving airway control in 92% of patients with obstruction from thyroid malignancy [95]. Potential com­plications of this technique include stent migration, stent obstruction, and in-growth of tumor into the stent causing recurrent obstruc­tion [95].
Outcomes and Prognosis
Despite improvements in diagnosis, surgical technique and the development of newer multi­modal chemotherapy and radiation therapy protocols, the prognosis of patients with UTC remains poor (Table 9.1). Complications of dis­seminated metastatic disease are frequently the cause of death and limit survival even where effective local control can be achieved with aggressive surgical resection and radiotherapy. The majority of patients with UTC will die from complications of disseminated metastatic dis­ease (usually pulmonary) or invasion of vital structures within the neck [44]. Airway obstruc­tion due to tumor invasion is the cause of death in 16–50% of cases [37, 44].
studies, with median survival durations of 3–7 months, and only a small proportion of patients surviving for longer than 1 year [27, 28, 37–39, 43]. A survival analysis of 516 cases of UTC from the SEER database found a disease-specific mor­tality of 80.7% at 12 months, with patient age less than 60 years, tumor confined to the thyroid and surgical resection of the tumor combined with radiotherapy being associated with a greater probability of survival on multivariate analysis [25]. Studies involving smaller series of patients with UTC have found that younger age at pre­sentation, smaller tumor size (<5–6 cm), the absence of disseminated metastatic disease, and complete surgical removal of the tumor have all been associated with an improved probability of survival or longer survival duration [22, 27, 28, 37–39, 43]. Where complete macroscopic resec­tion of the tumor can be performed, aggressive multimodality treatment with surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy has been associated with long-term survival in a small proportion of selected patients [43]. Many of the longer-term survivors reported in case series of UTC are patients with small foci of anaplastic carcinoma seen within larger well-differentiated tumors or where UTC is found incidentally at thyroidect­omy [28, 40–42]. Such patients represent a small but distinct subgroup of UTC associated with a more favorable prognosis.
Table 9.1. Outcomes after treatment for undifferentiated thyroid carcinoma
Author Year Patients Surgical resection (%) Survival (%) Mean survival (months) McIvor [22] 1949–1999 134 72 9.7% – 1 year 3
Venkatesh [27] 1950–1987 121 73 14% – 2 year 7.2 Nilsson [84] 1971–1997 81 52 10% – 2 year 2.5–5.4 Pierie [28] 1969–1999 67 67 16% – 3 year ND Sugitani [39] 1976–1999 44 59 16% – 1 year 6 Sugino [42] 1989–1999 40 65 20% – 2 year ND Lo [38] 1968–1997 38 47 4% – 2 year 1.3 Haigh [43] 1973–1998 33 79 20% – 2 year 3.8 De Crevoisier [82] 1990–2000 30 80 27% – 3 year 10 Tan [37] 1968–1992 22 81 14% – 2 year 4.5
ND – not described
The 134 patients with UTC managed in a 50-year period at the Mayo Clinic had a median survival of only 3 months with only 9.7% of patients surviving beyond 1 year [22]. Similar outcomes have been documented in other
The development of metastatic disease is most frequently the determinant of survival in patients with UTC, and research into novel systemic therapies has been undertaken in an effort to improve the dismal outlook for patients with
134
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
disseminated disease. Targeted molecular ther­apy with the proteosome inhibitor bortezomib and the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor imati­nib mesylate have shown activity against UTC in vitro [96, 97]. Adenovirus-mediated gene therapy targeting the p53 gene mutation has also been attempted [98]. Redifferentiation of UTC cells to promote the uptake of radioactive iodine has also been examined experimentally, using reverse transcriptase inhibitors and virus-mediated thyr­oid transcription factor-1 gene transfer [99, 100]. Until such time as effective systemic therapies are discovered, multimodality therapy with che­motherapy and radiotherapy followed by com­plete surgical resection when possible offers the greatest chance of achieving local control, pallia­tion, and extension of survival in patients with this highly aggressive malignancy.
References
1. Hedinger CE, Williams ED, Sobin LH. Histological typ­ing of thyroid tumours. In: Hedinger CE, editors. The WHO international histological classification of tumours Berlin: Springer, 1988.
2. Volante M, Collini P, Nikiforov YE, et al. Poorly differen­tiated thyroid carcinoma: the Turin proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria and an algorithmic diagnostic approach. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(8):1256–64.
3. Sanders EM, Jr, LiVolsi VA, Brierley J, et al. An evi­dence-based reviewof poorlydifferentiated thyroid can­cer. World J Surg. 2007;31(5):934–45.
4. Carcangiu ML, Zampi G, Rosai J. Poorly differentiated (‘‘insular’’) thyroid carcinoma. A reinterpretation of Langhans’ ‘‘wuchernde Struma’’. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984; 8(9):655–68.
5. Pilotti S, Collini P, Mariani L, et al. Insular carcinoma: a distinct de novo entity among follicular carcinomas of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(12): 1466–73.
6. Volante M, Landolfi S, Chiusa L, et al. poorly differen­tiated carcinomas of the thyroid with trabecular, insu­lar, and solid patterns. Cancer. 2004; 100:950–7.
7. Lam K-Y, Lo C-Y, Chan K-W, Wan K-Y. Insular and ana­plastic carcinoma of the thyroid: a 45-year comparative study at a single institution and a review of the significance of p53 and p21. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3): 329–38.
8. Lai HW, Lee CH, Chen JY, et al. Insular thyroid carci­noma: collective analysis of clinicohistologic prognostic factors and treatment effect with radioiodine or radia­tion therapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(5):715–22.
9. Papotti M, Botto Micca F, Favero A, et al. Poorly differ­entiated thyroid carcinomas with primordial cell com­ponent. A group of aggressive lesions sharing insular, trabecular, and solid patterns. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993; 17(3):291–301.
10. Pellegriti G, Giuffrida D, Scollo C, et al. Long-term out­come of patients with insular carcinoma of the thyroid: the insular histotype is an independent predictor of poor prognosis. Cancer. 2002;95(10):2076–85.
11. Falvo L, Catania A, D’Andrea V, et al. Prognostic factors of insular versus papillary/follicular thyroid carcinoma. Am Surg. 2004;70(5):461–6.
12. GuiterGE,Auger M, Ali SZ, et al. Cytopathology of insular carcinoma of the thyroid. Cancer. 1999;87(4):196–202.
13. Nguyen GK, AkinMR. Cytopathologyofinsularcarcinoma of the thyroid. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25(5): 325–30.
14. Oertel YC, Miyahara-Felipe L. Cytologic features of insular carcinoma of the thyroid: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(8):572–5.
15. Ashfaq R, Vuitch F, Delgado R, Albores-Saavedra J. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas with an insular component. Cancer. 1994;73(2):416–23.
16. Sobrinho-Simoes M, Sambade C, Fonseca E, Soares P. Poorly differentiated carcinomas of the thyroid gland: a review of the clinicopathologic features of a series of 28 cases of a heterogeneous, clinically aggressive group of thyroid tumors. Int J Surg Pathol. 2002;10(2):123–31.
17. Wreesmann VB, Ghosseion RA, Patel SG, et al. Genome­wide appraisal of thyroid cancer progression. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(5):1549–56.
18. Saltman B, SinghB, HedvatCV,et al. Patternsof expression of cell cycle/apoptosis genes along the spectrum of thyroid carcinoma progression. Surgery. 2006;140: 899–906.
19. Justin EP, Seabold JE, Robinson RA, et al. Insular carci­noma: a distinct thyroid carcinoma with associated iodine-131 localization. J NuclMed. 1991;32(7):1358–63.
20. DiehlM,GraichenS,MenzelC,etal.F-18FDGPETin insular thyroid cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2003;28(9): 728–31.
21. Giammarile F, Hafdi Z, Bournaud C, et al. Is [18F]-2­fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) scintigraphy with non­dedicated positron emission tomography useful in the diagnostic management of suspected metastatic thyroid carcinoma in patients with no detectable radioiodine uptake? Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149(4):293–300.
22. McIver B, Hay ID, Giuffrida DF, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a 50-year experience at a single institution. Surgery. 2001;130:1028–34.
23. Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR. A national cancer data base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985–1995. Can­cer. 1998;83:2638–48.
24. Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. JAMA. 2006; 295:2164–7.
25. Kebebew E, Greenspan FS, Clark OH, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: treatment outcome and prognostic factors. Cancer. 2005;103:1330–5.
26. Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, Morris DM, Key CR. Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinoma: a population-based study of 15698 cases from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) program 1973–1991. Cancer. 1997; 79:564–73.
27. Venkatesh YS, Ordonez NG, Schulz PN, et al. Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid: a clinicopathologic study of 121 cases. Cancer. 1990;66:321–30.
28. Pierie JP, Muzikansky A, Gaz RD, et al. The effect of surgery and radiotherapy on outcome of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(1): 57–64.
29. Bakiri F, Djemli FK, MokraneLA, Djidel FK. The relative roles of endemic goitreand socioeconomic development status in the prognosis of thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;82(6):1146–53.
135
POORLY DIFFERENTIATED AND UNDIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER
30. Harach HR, Escalante DA, Onativia A, et al. Thyroid carcinoma and thyroiditis in an endemic goitre region before and after iodine prophylaxis. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1985;108(1):55–60.
31. Pettersson B, Cleman MP, Ron E, Adami H-O. Iodine supplementation in Sweden and regional trends in thyr­oid cancer incidence by histopathologic type. Int J Can­cer. 1996;65:13–19.
32. Baker HW. Anaplastic thyroid cancer twelve years after radioiodine therapy. Cancer. 1969;23(4):885–90.
33. Getaz EP, Shimaoka K. Anaplastic cardcinoma of the thyroid in a population irradiated for Hodgkin Disease, 1910–1960. J Surg Oncol. 1979;12(2):181–9.
34. Getaz EP, Shimaoka K, Rao U. Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid following external irradiation. Cancer 1979;43(6):2248–53.
35. Kapp DS, LiVolsi VA, Sanders MM. Anaplastic carcinoma following well-differentiated thyroid cancer: etiological considerations. Yale J Biol Med. 1982;55(5–6): 521–8.
36. Komorowski RA, Hanson GA, Garancis JC. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma following low-dose irradiation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978;70(2):303–7.
37. Tan RK, Finley RK, Driscoll D, et al. Anaplastic carci­noma of the thyroid: a 24-year experience. Head Neck 1995;17:41–8.
38. Lo C-Y, Lam K-Y, Wan K-Y. Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid. Am J Surg. 1999;177:337–9.
39. Sugitani I, Kasai N, Fujimoto Y, Yanagisawa A. Prog­nostic factors and therapeutic strategy for anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2001;25(5): 617–22.
40. Aldinger KA, Samaan NA, Ibanez M, Hill CS. Anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid: a review of 84 cases of spindle and giant cell carcinoma of the thyroid. Cancer. 1978;41(6):2267–75.
41. Demeter JG, De Jong SA, Lawrence AM, Paloyan E. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: riskfactors andoutcome. Surgery. 1991;110(6):956–61; discussion 961–3.
42. Sugino K, Ito K, Mimura T, et al. The important role of operations in the management of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2002;131:245–8.
43. Haigh PI, Ituarte PH, Wu HS, et al. Completely resected anaplastic thyroid carcinoma combined with adjuvant chemotherapy and irradiation is associated with pro­longed survival. Cancer. 2001;91:2335–42.
44. Kitamura Y, Shimizu K, Nagahama M, et al. Immediate causes of death in thyroid carcinoma: Clinicopathologi­cal analysis of 161 fatal cases. J Clin Endocrinol. Metab. 1999;84(11):4043–9.
45. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID. AJCC cancer staging handbook: TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
46. Carcangiu ML, Steeper T, Zampi G, Rosai J. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a study of70 cases.Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;83:135–58.
47. LiVolsi VA. Surgical pathology of the thyroid. Vol. 22. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1990.
48. Oertel JE, Oertel YC. Pathology of anaplastic carcinoma. In: Wartofsky L, vanNostrum D, editors. Thyroid can­cer: a comprehensive guide to clinical management. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2000; 635–637.
49. Hedinger C, Williams ED, Sobin LH. The WHO histolo­gical classification of thyroid tumours: a commentary on the second edition. Cancer. 1989;63:908–11.
50. Wan S-K, Chan JK, Tang S-K. Paucicellular variant of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a mimic of Riedel’s thyr­oiditis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;105(4):388–93.
51. Mills SE, Stallings RG, Austin MB. Angiomatoid carci­noma of the thyroid gland. Anaplastic carcinoma with follicular and medullary features mimicking angiosar­coma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1986;86(5):674–8.
52. Pyke CM, Grant CS, Habermann TM, et al. Non-Hodg­kin’s lymphoma of the thyroid: is more than biopsy necessary? World J Surg. 1992;16(4):604–9; discussion 609–10.
53. DoriaR,JekelJF,CooperDL.Thyroidlymphoma.Thecase for combined modality therapy. Cancer. 1994; 73(1):200–6.
54. Skarsgard ED, Connors JM, Robins RE. A current ana­lysis of primary lymphoma of the thyroid. Arch Surg. 1991;126(10):1199–203; discussion 1203–4.
55. LiVolsi VA, Brooks JJ, Arendash-Durand B. Anaplastic thyroid tumors. Immunohistology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;87(4):434–42.
56. Shvero J, Gal R, Avidor I, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. A clinical, histologic, and immunohisto­chemical study. Cancer. 1988;62(2):319–25.
57. Nishiyama RH. Overview of surgical pathology of the thyroid gland. World J Surg. 2000;24(8):898–906.
58. Rodriguez JM, Pinero A, Ortiz S, et al. Clinical and histological differences in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(1):34–8.
59. Spires JR, Schwartz MR, Miller RH. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Association with differentiated thyroid cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(1): 40–4.
60. Wiseman SM, Loree TR, Rigual NR, et al. Anaplastic transformation of thyroid cancer: review of clinical, pathologic, and molecular evidence provides new insights into disease biology and future therapy. Head Neck. 2003(August):662–70.
61. Begum S, Rosenbaum E, Henrique R, et al. BRAF muta­tions in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: implications for tumor origin, diagnosis and treatment. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(11):1359–63.
62. Galera-Davidson H, Bibbo M, Dytch HE, et al. Nuclear DNA in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma with a differen­tiated component. Histopathology. 1987;11(7):715–22.
63. Hunt JL, Tometsko M, LiVolsi VA, et al. Molecular evidence of anaplastic transformation in coexisting well-differentiated and anaplastic carcinomas of the thyroid. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(12):1559–64.
64. Wiseman SM, Loree TR, Hicks WL, et al. Anaplastic thyroid cancer evolved from papillary carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:96–100.
65. Fagin JA, Matsuo K, Karmakar A, et al. High prevalence of mutations of p53 gene in poorly differentiated human thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:179–84.
66. Ito T, Seyama T, Mizuno T, et al. Unique association of p53 mutations with undifferentiated but not with differ­entiated carcinomas of the thyroid gland. Cancer Res. 1992;52(5):1369–71.
67. Quiros RM, Ding HG, Gattuso P, et al. Evidencethat one subset of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas are derived from papillary carcinomas due to BRAF and p53 muta­tions. Cancer. 2005;103:2261–8.
68. Donghi R, Longoni A,Pilotti S,et al.Gene p53 mutations are restricted to poorly differentiated and undifferen­tiated carcinomas of the thyroid gland. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(4):1753–60.
136
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
69. Dobashi Y, Sugimura H, Sakamoto A, et al. Stepwise participation of p53 gene mutation during dedifferen­tiation of human thyroid carcinomas. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1994;3(1):9–14.
70. La Perle KM, Jhiang SM, Capen CC. Loss of p53 pro­motes anaplasia and local invasion inret/PTC1-induced thyroid carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(2):671–7.
71. Mizutani K, Onda M, Asaka S, et al. Overexpressed in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma-1 (OEATC-1) as a novel gene responsible for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:1785–90.
72. Pilotti S, Collini P, Rilke F, et al. Bcl-2 protein expression in carcinomas originating from the follicular epithelium of the thyroid gland. J Pathol. 1994;172(4):337–42.
73. Zou M, Shi Y, al-Sedairy S, Farid NR. High levels of Nm23 gene expression in advanced stage of thyroid carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 1993;68(2):385–8.
74. Wiseman SM, Masoudi H, Niblock P, et al. Derange­ment of the E-cadherin/catenin complex is involved in transformation of differentiated to anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2006;191:581–7.
75. Hemmer S, Wasenius VM, Knuutila S, et al. DNA copy number changes in thyroid carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1999;154(5):1539–47.
76. Us-Krasovec M, Golouh R, Auersperg M, et al. Ana­plastic thyroid carcinoma infine needle aspirates. Acta Cytologica. 1996;40:953–8.
77. Lowhagen T, Willems J-S, Lundell G, et al. Aspiration biopsy cytology in diagnosis of thyroidcancer. World J Surg. 1981;5:61–73.
78. Takashima S, Morimoto S,Ikezoe J,et al.CT evaluation of anaplastic thyroidcarcinoma. AJRAm JRoentgenol. 1990;154(5):1079–85.
79. Wang JC, Takashima S, Takayama F, et al. Tracheal invasion by thyroid carcinoma: prediction using MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(4):929–36.
80. McDougall IR. PET scanning in anaplastic cancer of the thyroid. In: Wartofsky L, VanNostrand D, editors. Thyroid cancer: a comprehensive guide to clinical management. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2000: 639–640.
81. Agrawal S, Rao RS, Parikh DM, et al. Histologic trends in thyroid cancer 1969–1993: a clinicopathologic ana­lysis of the relative proportion of anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid. J Surg Oncol. 1996;63(4):251–5.
82. De Crevoisier R, Baudin E, Bachelot A, et al. Combined treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma with sur­gery, chemotherapy, and hyperfractionated acceler­ated external radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 60(4):1137–43.
83. Kim JH, Leeper RD. Treatment of anaplastic giant and spindle cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland with com­bination adriamycin and radiation therapy: a new approach. Cancer. 1983;52(6):954–7.
84. Nilsson O, Lindeberg J, Zedenius J, et al. Anaplastic giant cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland: treatment and survival over a 25-year period. World J Surg. 1998; 22:725–30.
85. Tennvall J, Lundell G, Hallquist A, et al. Combined doxorubicin, hyperfractionated radiotherapy, and
surgery in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a report on two protocols. Cancer. 1994;74:1348–54.
86. Tennvall J, Lundell G, Wahlberg P, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: three protocols combining doxor­ubicin, hyperfractionated radiotherapy andsurgery. Br J Surg. 2002;86(12):1848–53.
87. AinKB,EgorinMJ,DeSimonePA.Treatmentofanaplas­tic thyroid carcinoma with paclitaxel: phase 2 trial using ninety-six-hour infusion. Thyroid. 2000;10(7): 587–94.
88. Ain KB. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a therapeutic challenge. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;16:64–9.
89. Busnardo B, Daniele O, Pelizzo MR, et al. A multimod­ality therapeutic approach in anaplastic thyroid carci­noma: study on 39 patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 2000;23(11):755–61.
90. Shimaoka K, Schoenfeld DA, DeWys WD, et al. A randomized trial of doxorubicin versus doxorubicin plus cisplatin in patients with advanced thyroid carci­noma. Cancer. 1985;56:2155–60.
91. Brierley JD, Tsang RW. External radiation therapy of anaplastic thyroid cancer. In: Wartofsky L, vanNostrand D, editors. Thyroid cancer: a comprehensive guide to clinical management. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2000:641–2.
92. Holting T, Meybier H, Buhr H. Problems of tracheot­omy in locally invasive anaplastic thyroid cancer. Lan­genbecks Arch Chir. 1989;374(2):72–6.
93. Gunasekaran S, Osborn JR, Morgan A, Griffiths MV. Tracheal stenting: a better method of dealing with air­way obstruction due to thyroid malignancies than tra­cheostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118(6):462–4.
94. Hopkins C, Stearns M, Watkinson AF. Palliative tra­cheal stenting in invasive papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol. 2001; 115(11):935–7.
95. Noppen M, Poppe K, D’Haese J, et al. Interventional bronchoscopy for treatment of tracheal obstruction secondary to benign or malignant thyroid disease. Chest. 2004;125(2):723–30.
96. Mitsiades CS, McMillin D, Kotoula V, et al. Antitumor effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in medullary and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):4013–21.
97. Rao AS, Kremenevskaja N, von Wasielewski R, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling mediates antineoplastic effects of imatinib mesylate (gleevec) in anaplastic thyr­oid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(1): 159–68.
98. Nagayama Y, Yokoi H, Takeda K, et al. Adenovirus­mediated tumor suppressor p53 gene therapy for ana­plastic thyroid carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4081–6.
99. Landriscina M, Fabiano A, Altamura S, et al. Reverse transcriptase inhibitors down-regulate cellproliferation in vitro and in vivo and restore thyrotropin signaling and iodine uptake in human thyroid anaplastic carci­noma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(10):5663–71.
100. Furuya F, Shimura H, Miyazaki A, et al. Adenovirus­mediated transfer of thyroid transcription factor-1 induces radioiodide organification and retention in thyr­oid cancer cells. Endocrinology. 2004;145(11): 5397–405.
10

Postoperative Management of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

R. Michael Tuttle and Rebecca Leboeuf
Introduction
For the nonsurgeon, postoperative management of thyroid cancer usually begins a few days or weeks after surgery when the patient returns to the office to discuss the final pathology report and determine if any additional therapy is neces­sary. Depending on the specifics of theindividual case, additional therapies that may be required can include further surgery, radioactive iodine ablation, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression with levothyroxine, external beam irradiation, or other systemic therapies.
The decision to recommend additional treat­ments beyond the initial thyroid surgery should be based on an accurate assessment of risk of recurrence and death from thyroid cancer for each individual patient. Recently, several inter­national authorities on thyroid cancer have pub­lished guidelines in which estimates of risk of recurrence and risk of disease-specific death are used to guide both initial treatment and follow­up recommendations [1–5].
In this chapter, we will review a practical app­roach to risk stratification for well-differentiated thyroid cancer that can be used to estimate both theriskofrecurrenceandtheriskofdeathfrom thyroid cancer. By balancing the risk and benefits of additional therapies with this understanding of the likely clinical course, a rationale treatment and follow-up plan can be developed for individual patients.
Initial Risk Stratification
Over the years, several staging systems have been published that can accurately identify patients at either low or high risk of dying from thyroid cancer [6–13]. These staging systems predict dis­ease-specific mortality based on clinical data that can be considered either as patient-related fac­tors (age and gender) or tumor-related factors (size of primary, histology, gross extrathyroi­dal extension, completeness of resection, cervical lymph node involvement, or distant metastasis) [14]. From a simplified clinical perspective, these important clinical factors can be used to stratify the risk of dying from thyroid cancer into very low, low, intermediate, and high (see Table 10.1) [15, 16].
In thyroid cancer, the risk of recurrence does not always parallel the risk of disease­specific death [17]. This is particularly appar­ent in the young thyroid cancer patients where the risk of recurrence is very high, but the risk of death is very low. Therefore, in addition to determining the risk of disease-specific death in thyroid cancer patients, it is also necessary to separately estimate the risk of recurrence. In many cases, additional treatments may be effective at decreasing recurrence, but have lit­tle impact on overall survival, especially in young patients who are at high risk of recur­rence but very low risk of death from thyroid cancer [2, 14].
J.G.H. Hubbard et al. (eds.), Endocrine Surgery, Springer Specialist Surgery Series, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84628-881-4_10, Ó Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009
137
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
Table 10.1. Risk of death from thyroid cancer
Very low risk Low risk Intermediate risk High risk
Age at diagnosis <45 years <45 years Young patients (<45 years)
Classic PTC > 4cm
Or vascular invasion
Or extrathyroidal extension
Or worrisome histology of any size**
Primary tumor
size
<1 cm 1–4 cm Older patients (>45 years)
Classic PTC < 4cm
Or extrathyroidal extension
Or worrisome histology < 1–2 cm confined to the thyroid**
Histology Classic PTC, confined
to the thyroid gland*
Completeness
Complete resection Complete resection Complete resection Incomplete tumor
Classic PTC, confined
to the thyroid gland*
Histology in conjunction with
age as above
of resection
Lymph node
None apparent Present or absent*** Present or absent*** Present or
involvement
Distant metastasis None apparent None apparent None apparent Present
*Confined to the thyroid gland (even if multifocal) with no evidence of vascular invasion or extrathyroidal extension **Worrisome histologies includes histologic subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer such as tall cell variant, columnar variant, insular variant, and poorly differentiated thyroid cancers. ***Cervical LN metastases in older patients, but probably not in younger patients, may confer an increased risk of death from disease. Only those patients meeting all criteria within the respective column would be classified as very low risk or low risk. Older patients with either incomplete tumor resection or presence of distant metastasis are considered high risk irrespective of tumor size and specific histology. Patients with a combination of risk factors (age, histology, and tumor size) crossing over between columns are classified as intermediate-risk patients.
>45 years
>4 cm classic PTC
Worrisome
histology
>1–2 cm**
resection
absent***
138
Table 10.2. Risk stratification for the likelihood of clinically evident thyroid cancer recurrence following complete resection
of primary tumor in patients with no evidence of distant metastases at initial evaluation
Low risk Intermediate risk High risk
Age at diagnosis Any age 20–60 years <20 or >60 years Primary tumor size <1 cm 1–4 cm >4cm Histology Classic PTC, confined
to the thyroid gland
Lymph node
None apparent Present or absent Present
Classic PTC, minor extrathyroidal
extension, or vascular invasion, or multifocal disease
Other than classic PTC, gross
extrathyroidal extension or vascular invasion
involvement
Patients with incomplete tumor resection or distant metastasis at diagnosis are very likely to have persistent disease even after aggressive initial therapy and therefore are dealt with differently than the more usual patient without evidence of distant metastasis in which all gross evidence of disease has been resected and are therefore not included in this risk stratification scheme.
139
POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF WELL-DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER
Based on manyof the same clinical and patho­logical characteristics that are used in the staging systems that predict death from thyroid cancer, the risk of recurrence can be estimated in an individual patient to be either low, intermediate, or high (see Table 10.2) [15, 16]. To be conserva­tive, patients with a histology more worrisome than classic papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), microscopic multifocal disease, or microscopic extrathyroidal extension are considered to be at intermediate risk. Additional research is needed to make sure that we arenot unnecessarily upsta­ging these patients, particularly when the pri­mary tumor is quite small.
Patients with incomplete tumor resection or known distant metastases at presentation almost always require additional therapy [2, 18, 19]. They require individualized therapy and careful assessment of response to therapy evaluations to guide their management.
Initial Postoperative Visit
Accurate risk stratification begins with a careful analysis of all the available clinical data that have been obtained for that individual patient. At this initial postoperative visit,all data obtainedduring the preoperative evaluation, the intraoperative procedure, as well as the postoperative pathology report and lab data are analyzed in an attempt to understand both the extent of disease and likely clinical course so that we can tailor specific treat­ment recommendations for an individual patient (see Table 10.3).
It is important to emphasize that the thyroid pathology report does not provide all the data necessary for accurate risk stratification. In order to properly risk stratify patients, it is critical that treating clinicians have a very good under­standing of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative findings inorder to gain a full appre­ciation of the extent and potential aggressiveness of an individual patient’s thyroid cancer. Unfortu­nately, patients are often classified as either low or high risk based on the pathology report alone without incorporating all other available clinical information into the risk stratification scheme. This can result in either an overestimate or under­estimate of the risk for death or recurrence.
For example, a 35-year-old female patient with a 1.5-cm papillary thyroid cancer could be inappropriately classified as having a low
Table 10.3. Data necessary for accurate risk stratification
Preoperative findings Physical examination
Vocal cord function Cross-sectional imaging
(if obtained)
Intraoperative findings Extent of thyroid surgery
Extent of lymph node dissection Presence of gross extrathyroidal
extension
Involvement of major structures
in the neck
Completeness of tumor
resection
Pathology findings Histopathology
Molecular characterization
Laboratory findings Serum thyroglobulin
Calcium, albumin, PTH TSH, Free T4
risk for disease-specific death and recurrence if the ‘‘extrathyroidal extension’’ described on the pathology report was mistakenly assumed to reflect minimal microscopic extracapsular extension rather that the margin of extrathyr­oidal gross tumor invading into major neck structures.Similarly,eveninthesettingofa very small papillary or follicular thyroid can­cer, the presence of pulmonary nodules on a preoperative chest radiograph or a postopera­tive serum thyroglobulin (Tg) of 1,500 ng/mL would raise the suspicion of distant metastases and likely lead to additional diagnostic evalua­tions and therapies.
While most patients have a neck ultrasound and chest radiograph prior to surgery, addi­tional use of cross-sectional imaging studies is not routinely recommended unless the patient is at an increased risk for distant metastases [2, 3]. Since patients classified as high risk for recurrence or death are also often at significant risk for distant metastases, cross-sectional ima­ging of the lungs and brain is recommended to identify other sites of disease that may need therapy or close observation. Likewise, aggressive histologies such as Hurthle cell car­cinoma, tall cell or poorly differentiated var­iants of papillary thyroid may concentrate radioactive iodine (RAI) poorly and therefore are often better detected with 18 FDG PET scanning than RAI scanning [2, 14, 20]. It is important to avoid intravenous contrast