Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1382_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
180
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
of central node metastases in the neck. With one to nine positive nodes in the central compartment, contralateral lateral neck involvement increased from 5 to 38 %, reach­ing 77% with 10 or more positive central nodes [121]. For patients with intensive cen­tral neck involvement, microdissection of the central and both lateral neck compartments is recommended.
4. Lymph node metastases have not been observed in the infrabrachiocephalic upper mediastinum with small primary tumors up to a tumor diameter of 10 mm [14]. Like lateral node metastases in the contralateral neck, mediastinal node metastases also occur at the same time as distant metastases [121, 122]. Because of this coincidence with systemic disease, the clinical benefit of trans­sternal mediastinal LND, without any evi­dence of mediastinal disease, is too small to warrant its routine use.
5. Sporadic and hereditary MTC do not differ from each other in metastatic behavior (lym­phangic, hematogenous) when they have the same tumor stage [114, 120]. The required extent of dissection is largely determined by oncologic features, such as multiple primary tumors, which are typical of hereditary dis­ease, and neck node metastases, which tend to be more advanced in sporadic disease for which early screening is less cost-effective and less widespread.
6. In hereditary disease, most of which is iden­tified through early screening, the timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy and the extent of lymph node surgery are based more on pre­operative calcitonin levels than on any other piece of information including type of RET mutation or preoperative ultrasound find­ings. The so far largest studies from the Euro­men Study Group [123–125], the French GETC Study Group [126], and smaller series from Germany and Austria [127], Halle [128, 129], St. Louis [65], and Houston [130] revealed the critical function of lymph node metastases in achieving cure, which play a far more important role than the primary tumors, the originators of lymphatic disse­mination. Especially when they are small, lymph node metastases cannot always be identified, neither by high-resolution cervi­cal ultrasonography nor by visual inspection, direct palpation or frozen section during the
operation. In this setting, determination of preoperative basal calcitonin levels is useful to identify those carriers who have not yet developed lymph node metastases. Based on literature data [125, 126] and personal experience, lymph node metastases are not present in gene carriers who still have normal basal calcitonin levels. It is therefore reason­able to perform compartment-oriented LND in previously untreated gene carriers with abnormal basal calcitonin levels but not in those with normal basal calcitonin levels [131].
7. In clinically apparent MTC, systemic disease is common. In occult MTC, laparoscopy [132], bone scintigraphy and MRI [133], liver angiography [134], FDG-PET scanning [50], and selective venous sampling of calci­tonin [135] are able to uncover distant metastases as the source of persistent hyper­calcitoninemia. In clinical practice, these sophisticated techniques can help one to plan reoperations more adequately, sparing patients with occult MTC an odyssey through many hospital departments with repeated imaging and frequent reoperations.
8. With the introduction of the technique of compartment-oriented microdissection, locoregional reoperations now result more often in the normalization of postoperative calcitonin levels [24, 136–139]. Indicative of surgical cure, this biochemical normalization is widely taken as a measure of surgical suc­cess. Because locoregional recurrence fre­quently acts as the ‘‘pacemaker’’ of disease, even extensive procedures are justified when they provide symptomic relief [111, 119].
9. Despite some improvements in recurrence­free and overall survival, biochemical cure rates remain unsatisfactory, especially for node-positive MTC patients (10–20%). Locoregional lymph node metastases and distant metastases represent the largest obstacle to normalization of serum calcito­nin levels. With more than 10 lymph node metastases, and more than two involved compartments, biochemical cure is excep­tional due to concomitant distant metas­tases [32, 117]. Early detection through calcitonin screening and adequate surgery based on the compartment-oriented dissec­tion technique remain decisive factors of cure [140–142].
181
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN THYROID CANCER
Surgical Techniques of Lymph Node Dissection
A recent study [143] suggested that as many as 75% of reoperations for persistent or recurrent PTC might have been preventable if the initial operation had followed applicable practice guidelines. Root cause analysis revealed that mainly the extent of initial LND had been inade­quate, much more often than the extent of thyr­oid resection which accounted for only 25% of inadequate procedures. Likewise, a significant proportion of patients with gross MTC continue to receive substandard treatment. Based on US SEER data, 15%of MTC patientsreceive less than total thyroidectomy, and 41% of MTC patients with stage IV disease have no LND whatsoever [144]. Although no comparable data exist for the other types of thyroid cancer, it is reasonable to assume that the failure to adequately dissect cer­vical lymph nodes is a major cause of locoregio­nal failure in patients with thyroid cancer, prompting even more operations at the cost of additional morbidity.
Significant progress in preoperative work-up and the development of the technique of com­partment-oriented microdissection [24, 117, 136, 137, 145–147] have resulted in more adequate initial operations for thyroid cancer. Several techniques of lymphnode management are avail­able to address the wide range of node metastasis from low-risk single-node to high-risk multiple­node involvement: sentinel node technique, focused approach, regional LND including exci­sion of single nodes (‘‘berry picking’’), and com­partment-oriented microdissection.
Sentinel Node Technique
A multitude of studies have appeared over the past decade dealing with the feasibility and accuracy of the sentinel node technique for dif­ferentiated thyroid cancer [148–158]. These stu­dies reported a substantial rate of false-positive and, even more often, false-negative results [159, 160]. The high variability of lymphatic drainage in more than one direction and the frequent existence of multiple primary thyroid tumors render the sentinel node approach unsuitable for routine use in patients with thyr­oid cancer outside a research setting.
Focused Approach
For a carefully selected subset of patients with recurrent thyroid cancer, the focused approach through a small skin incision may be appropriate as a minimum procedure. As in any targeted intervention, the focused approach requires a valid surgical target that must have been identi­fied before or, at the latest, during the operation [161]. Various techniques have been developed to guide the excision of that target, including radioiodine-directed probes [162, 163], hook needles [164], and high-resolution ultrasonogra­phy [161, 165, 166]. The latter two techniques also work for recurrent radioiodine-negative dif­ferentiated and medullary thyroid cancer. As a matter of principle, a focused approach is not indicated for recurrent thyroid cancer with tumor deposits at multiple sites.
Regional Lymph Node Dissection Including Excision of Single Nodes (‘‘Berry Picking’’)
Like the focused approach, the excision of sin­gle nodes (‘‘berry picking’’) may be suitable for some patients who previously underwent compartment-oriented LND for low-risk thyr­oid cancer and now require reoperations for locoregional recurrence in the dissected area. For cosmetic reasons, the neck should prefer­ably be entered through a previous skin inci­sion after excision of the scar. Neither approach is recommended for the initial clear­ance of positive nodes [167]. As a general rule, gross node metastases from MTC and PTC are surrounded by occult node metastases, all of which can be dispersed across more than one region. If not cleared entirely, they are a fre­quent source of recurrence. For these reasons, the single-node and single-region approach have been largely abandoned [168].
Compartment-Oriented Microdissection
Compartment-oriented microdissection [24] is the standard procedure for node-positive thyr­oid cancer. It can involve one or more compart­ments. While, mainly advocated for surgery
182
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
with curative intent, compartment-oriented microdissection can also be effective in main­taining local control in patients with stable sys­temic disease. Depending on the clinical context, the dissection may progress from the lateral compartment(s) toward the central com­partment (centripetal approach) or vice versa (centrifugal approach). Upon preoperative evi­dence of locally advanced thyroid cancer in a previously untreated patient, the centripetal approach is the procedure of choice at the authors’ institution. In the absence of such con­firmation, the operation starts at the central neck compartment, which is removed together with the thyroid gland as one contiguous surgi­cal specimen. Upon histopathological confirma­tion of cancer, the dissection proceeds to the lateral neck compartments, one or both of which are cleared as needed.
As elsewhere in the body, solid organs are embedded in fibrofatty tissue. Containing arteries, veins, and the lymphatic system including the locoregional nodes, this fibrofatty tissue fills the space between these organs. The concept of com­partment-oriented microdissection is to dissect the compartmental fatty tissue as one contiguous surgical specimen to ensure that all locoregional nodes are removed whereas vessels, nerves, and muscles (other than strap muscles) are preserved. This way, the compartment-oriented approach provides for the elimination of extranodal tumor deposits from the neck [169, 170].
As outlined above, the central neck compart­ment is limited dorsally by the trachea with the thyroid gland and laterally by the medial aspect of the common carotid arteries. Anatomical landmarks thus delineate the borders of the central neck compartment. Conversely, no such landmarks exist to mark off the lateral neck and the mediastinal compartment medi­ally from the pharyngeal and laterally from the nuchal, axillary and middle mediastinal nodes, respectively.
The surgical technique of compartment­oriented microdissection in the neck and med­iastinum has been described repeatedly in surgical textbooks [171, 172]. The key elements of this technique can be summarized as follows.
Central Neck Compartment
Whenever there is evidence of extrathyroidal extension of thyroid cancer, the strap muscles
are removed together with the central lymph node compartment (and the thyroid gland, if not yet resected) as one contiguous surgical specimen. At first surgery, the thyroid gland is removed as a whole together with the right andleftportionsofthecentralneckcompart­ment. For oncological reasons, the thyroid gland is not divided at the isthmus, nor is it separated from its adjacent fatty tissue, which encloses the central lymph nodes (Fig. 13.2). The central neck dissection includes the para­tracheal nodes both ventral and dorsal to the recurrent laryngeal nerve. These nodes may be a cause of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in node-positive thyroid cancer. The upper parathyroid glands often are preserved in situ, whereas this is unfeasible most of the time for the lower parathyroid glands. Sub­mental and submandibular nodes are routi­nely dissected in MTC but not in PTC.
Lateral Neck Compartment
Starting at the lateral aspect of the jugular vein, the dissection is carried forward toward the venous angle. Divided lymphatic vessels are meticulously ligated, especially on the left side, to prevent lymphatic leakage at the venous angle from injuries to the thoracic or right lym­phatic duct, which are a major cause of morbid­ity. To confirm the continued function of motor nerves running through the lateral compart­ment (e.g., accessory or phrenic nerve), the same neuromonitoring technique can be used as for the recurrent laryngeal or vagal nerve. In MTC, the dissection routinely includes level II–V. In PTC without evidence of level I and II involvement, the dissection may be restricted to level III–V [173]. The sternocleidomastoid mus­cles are preserved unless they have been invaded by thyroid cancer.
Mediastinal Compartment
Transsternal LND is warranted only for con­firmed mediastinal nodes or extrathyroidal extension of the primary cancer into the infrabrachiocephalic mediastinum. A com­plete median sternotomy is required for full exposure and complete removal of all fatty tissue with the thymus and mediastinal nodes down to the tracheal bifurcation and the azygous vein. Special attention is paid to
183
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN THYROID CANCER
a
b
c
Fig. 13.2. Compartment-oriented microdissection of the central compartment [24] combined with total thyroidectomy. RLN,
recurrent laryngeal nerve; IONM, intraoperative neuromonitoring electrode; LTL, left thyroid lobe; RTL, right thyroid lobe; C1a, right central neck compartment; C1b, left central neck compartment.
the course of the recurrent laryngeal nerve on either side, which can be highly variable, and to the mediastinal passage of the phrenic nerve. Either nerve must be carefully pre­served. When the central neck compartment and the upper mediastinal compartment are dissected in one session, they are removed together as one contiguous surgical specimen (Fig. 13.3).
Surgical Concept
Inadequate lymph node surgery is the main cause of recurrent thyroid cancer [143]. It more seriously affects those patients who initi­ally present with gross rather than occult
disease [24, 41, 60]. Although there are no good data regarding the impact of hospital or surgeon expertise on outcome in thyroid can­cer, it is reasonable to assume that professional training and the experience of operating sur­geons and their institutions decreases the rates of tumor recurrence and surgical morbidity and perhaps increases survival [174–178].
Typical of rare diseases such as thyroid cancer, retrospective studies may be the sole evidence base to derive treatment recommen­dations. When more than one treatment option is available, the grade of each recommendation must be considered. Unfortunately, retrospec­tive studies are not well controlled most of the time because there is often just one interven­tion or, when two or more interventions are
184
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
Fig. 13.3. Transsternal four-compartment microdissection with combined microdissection of the central and mediastinal
compartment [24]. LTL, left thyroid lobe; RTL, right thyroid lobe; (C1a) right central neck compartment; (C1b) left central neck compartment; (C2) right lateral neck compartment; (C3) left lateral neck compartment; (C4a) right upper mediastinal compartment; (C4b) left upper mediastinal compartment; BCV, virtual level of the left brachiocephalic vein.
compared, assignment to treatment was not randomized. As a consequence, unmeasured and unmeasurable confounding factors cannot be controlled for and may produce spurious results and conclusions. The ‘‘best treatment’’ is selected based on ‘‘best available evidence’’ and the patient’s personal values and preferences.
The following concept summarizes cur­rent evidence regarding surgical treatment strategies (Table 13.3). This concept draws on current literature, international practice guidelines [6–8], and the authors’ experi­ence with some 1500 patients with thyroid cancer seen over a 13-year period at a single institution, many of whom underwent reo­perations for recurrence [179].
Papillary Carcinoma
When one weighs the considerable morbid­ity of LND (hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy) against the low risk of locoregional recurrence, there is no indi­cation for routine LND for occult (10 mm) node-negative PTC unless adverse features are present, such as invasion of the thyroid capsule, multifocal tumor growth, diffuse­sclerosing or tall cell variants, or distant metastases. For all other PTC, compart­ment-oriented mircodissection (COMD) of affected compartments is recommended. Thereissomeevidencetosuggestthatrou­tine dissection of both lateral neck
compartments may be beneficial in high­risk PTC with special risk factors, such as locally advanced or poorly differentiated tumor growth, multiple central and lateral node metastases ipsilateral to the primary tumor, or the diffuse sclerosing variant.
For completion, all affected compartments should be dissected in patients with multiple node metastases who initially did not undergo compartment-oriented microdissection and now have locoregional recurrence. Single-node recurrences do not necessitate extensive reoperations.
Follicular Carcinoma
In FTC, node metastases are harbingers of sys­temic disease. Routine LND therefore is not a key element of the surgical strategy. In node­positive FTC with multiple node metastases, a regional- or compartment-oriented approach is favored over a focused approach or excision of single nodes (‘‘berry picking’’). The key objec­tive of lymph node surgery for FTC is local control.
Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma
Stage is the single most powerful predictor of outcome in MTC [114]. When stage is adjusted for, there is no difference between sporadic and hereditary MTC. Both forms of MTC are treated equally, especially node-positive tumors. Subtle differences in treatment may exist, for instance
185
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN THYROID CANCER
Table 13.3. Surgical concept of lymph node surgery in thyroid cancer
Tumor type Extent of disease Surgical strategy PTC at first surgery:
– occult PTC (<10 mm), solitary, N0, M0, T1 – all other PTC
– node-positive PTC with special risk factors (e.g., T1-3b,
T4, diffuse sclerosing, tall cell, poor differentiation)
at reoperation:
– solitary LNM – multiple LNM
FTC at first surgery:
– minimally or widely invasive FTC,
no LNM – solitary LNM – multiple LNM
no routine LND routine COMD C1 and COMD of affected
compartment(s)
COMD C1–3
focused or regional LND COMD
no routine LND regional LND
COMD of affected compartment(s)
at reoperation:
– solitary LNM – multiple LNM
focused or regional LND regional LND or COMD of involved
compartment(s)
MTC at first surgery:
gene carriers, bCT $, sCT $
bCT $, sCT " bCT "
no LND COMD C1 COMD C1 – 3
noncarriers,
<5 mm, or sCT < 500 pg/ml >5 mm, or sCT > 500 pg/ml
solitary or multiple LNM
COMD C1 COMD C1–3
COMD C1–3
at reoperation:
– solitary LNM – multiple LNM
TNM, classification to TNM supplement, third edition [28]; COMD, compartment-oriented microdissection; C1, central neck compartment according to the compartment classification [24], comprising levels I and VI of the classification of
American Academy of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery [27];
C1–3, central and both lateral neck compartments according to the compartment classification [24], comprising levels I–VI according to the
classification of American Academy of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery [27]; LND, lymph node dissection; LNM, lymph node metastases; bCT, basal calcitonin; sCT, stimulated (peak) calcitonin;
$ normal serum levels " elevated serum levels
COMD C1–3 COMD C1–3
in the early phase of MTC because occult her­editary MTC, unlike sporadic MTC, arises from neoplastic C-cell hyperplasia. Basal and stimu­lated calcitonin levels were shown to differ
between node-negative and node-positive her­editary (but not in sporadic, occult MTC), more than age or type of the respective germline mutation [180]. The risk of node metastases
186
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
is almost nonexistent in gene carriers with normal basal calcitonin levels but increases significantly when these levels are above nor­mal [125–128, 181, 182]. For personalized prophylactic surgery, the gene carrier’s age, type of mutation [65, 131], and basal calcito­nin levels are helpful when considering the need for additional node dissection during total thyroidectomy. In hereditary and spora­dic MTC alike, the risk of node metastases increases with primary tumors >5 cm [183] and stimulated calcitonin values >500 pg/ml [180]. In this setting, routine dissection of the central and both lateralneckcompartmentsis advised.
When MTC patients develop locoregional recurrence in the neck after a less than compart­ment-oriented microdissection, the central and both lateral neck compartments should be dis­sected for completion altogether. Conversely, focused or regional approaches are usually ade­quate for recurrent MTC after previous com­partment-oriented microdissection. The prog­nosis of patients with recurrent MTC obviously hinges more on calcitonin-doubling times [112] and CEA levels [113] than on initial tumor stage. Unless they are high, elevated calcitonin and CEA levels are compatible with excellent long-term survival. In patients with hypercalcitoninemia, new imaging techniques, especially PET and contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, localize previously ‘‘ oc cul t’’ dis eas e m ore precisely than ever before. These advance­ments in imaging have enabled one to better differentiate between patients with solely local disease, which is amenable to surgery, and sys­temic disease.
Conclusion
Frequently, extension of the primary tumor through the thyroid capsule and lymph node metastases are early events in thyroid cancer, especially with PTC and MTC. Regardless of the effect on survival, lymph node metastases are a frequent source of locoregional recur­rence, which is often caused by an inadequate initial operation. Lymph node metastases in the neck and mediastinum are associated with additional morbidity, from both the tumor and the surgical efforts required to
remove it. Early detection and compartment­oriented microdissection hold the keys to cure in thyroid cancer, calling for more profes­sional training in the indications for, and the extent and technique of, compartment-oriented microdissection.
Metastatic thyroid cancers do not follow the path of classic head and neck cancers. As a corollary, a classification of locoregional nodes originally devised for head and neck cancer can­not simply be translated to thyroid cancer by analogy. Tailored to the locoregional lymph node system of the thyroid, the compartment classification is more suitable for thyroid can­cer surgery and is the only system which includes the infrabrachiocephalic upper med­iastinal nodes.
Involvement of the lateral compartment of the ipsilateral neck is almost as common as central neck involvement, not just in PTC but also in MTC. From an oncological point of view, dissection of the central neck compart­ment alone is more diagnostic than therapeu­tic. Central LND may be adequate for early thyroid cancer with a few positive nodes. For previously untreated tumors with multiple node metastases, the central neck compart­ment and the lateral neck compartment ipsi­lateral to the primary tumor are dissected as a minimum. Although routine dissection of both lateral neck compartments for node-positive MTC is widely accepted, its use is more con­troversial in PTC unless these compartments are clinically affected.
With the introduction of the revolutionary concept of DNA-based prophylactic thyroi­dectomy [184, 185], it has become apparent that node metastases in hereditary MTC can­not be reliably predicted by the gene car­rier’s age or type of mutation. To minimize both overtreatment and undertreatment of carriers, basal calcitonin levels should be determined. Normal basal levels suggest the adequacy of total thyroidectomy alone, unless there is clinical evidence to the con­trary, whereas elevated basal levels indicate a need for additional LND.
For palliation of thyroid cancer, the role of lymph node surgery within a multidisciplinary effort is limited. In locally advanced thyroid cancer, LND can be effective in reaching local control in the neck, silencing the ‘‘pacemaker of the disease.’’
187
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN THYROID CANCER
In conclusion, surgeons are the champions of local control of thyroid cancer. Commanding an armamentarium of highly sensitive and effec­tive tools, they tailor the extent of surgery to the extent of disease. Through the timely deliv­ery of adequate initial operations, surgeons can reduce the number of reoperations for recurrent thyroid cancer, preventing unnecessary mor­bidity from local tumor invasion and corrective surgical procedures.
References
1. Machens A, Hinze R, Lautenschla¨ger C, Thomusch O, Dralle H. Thyroid carcinoma invading the cervicovisc­eral axis: routes of invasion and clinical implications. Surgery. 2001;129: 23–8.
2. Bernier MO, Leenhardt L, Hoang C, Aurengo A, Mary JY, Menegaux F, Enkaoua E, Turpin G, Chiras J, Saillant G, Hejblum G. Survival and therapeutic modalities in patients with bone metastases of dif­ferentiated thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1568–73.
3. Brauckhoff M, Dorsch K, Ha¨decke J, Kujat Chr, Straube F, Krause U, Dralle H. Multimodales Therapiekonzept bei metastasiertem follicula¨ren Schilddru¨sencarcinom mit Hyperthyreose. Chirurg. 2001;72:37–42.
4. Lorenz K, Brauckhoff M, Behrmann C, Sekulla C, Ukkat J, Brauckhoff K, Gimm O, Dralle H. Selective arterial chemoembolization for hepatic metastases from medul­lary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:986–93.
5. Lee J, Sogutlu G, leard L, Zarnegar R, Bailey J, Golden J, Hays S, Kebebew E, Duh QY, Clark O.Lung transplanta­tion for pulmonary metastases and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis after radioactive iodine ablation of extensive lung metastases from papillary thyroid carci­noma. Thyroid. 2007;17:367–9.
6. Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Sherman SI, Tuttle RM. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2006;16:1–33.
7. Pacini E, Schlumberger M, Dralle H, Elisei R, Smit JWA, Wiersinga W and the European Thyroid Cancer Task­force.European consensusforthemanagement ofpatient with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the follicular epithelium. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:787–803.
8. British Thyroid Association. Guidelines for the manage­ment of thyroid cancer. 2nd ed. Royal College of Physi­cans. 2007. www.british-thyroid-association.org.
9. Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR. A national cancer data base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985–1995. Can­cer. 1998;83:2638–48.
10. Sherman SI, Brierley JD, Sperling M, Ain KB, Bigos ST, Cooper DS, Haugen BR, Ho M, Klein I, Ladenson PW, Robbins J, Ross DS, Specker B, Taylor T, Maxon III HR for the National Thyroid Cancer Treatment Cooperative Study Registry Group. Prospective multicenter study of thyroid carcinoma treatment. Cancer. 1998;83:1012–21.
11. H¨olzer S, Reiners C, Mann K, Bamberg M, Rothmund M, Dudeck J, Stewart AK, Hundahl SA for the U.S. and German Thyroid Cancer Group. Pattern ofcare for patients with primary differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland treated in Germany during 1996. Cancer. 2000;89:192–201.
12. Kumar H, Daykin J, Holder R, Walkinson JC, Sheppard MC, Franklyn JA. An audit of management of differen­tiated thyroid cancer in specialist and non-specialist clinic settings. Clin Endocrinol. 2001;54:719–23.
13. Dralle H. Evidence-based endocrine surgery: thyroid cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:877–78.
14. Machens A, Hinze R, Thomusch O, Dralle H. Pattern of nodal metastasis for primary and reoperative thyroid cancer. World J Surg. 2002;26:22–28.
15. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Lautenschla¨ger C, Nguyen Thanh P, Dralle H. Enhancement of lymph node metas­tasis and distant metastasis of thyroid carcinoma. Can­cer. 2003;98:712–19.
16. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Dralle H. The prognostic value of primary tumor size in papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:2269–73.
17. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Dralle H. Skipmetastases in thyroid cancer leaping the central lymph node compart­ment. Arch Surg. 2004;139:43–5.
18. Machens A, Holzhausen HJ, Dralle H. Contralateral cer­vical and mediastinal lymph node metastases in medul­lary thyroid cancer: systemic disease? Surgery. 2006; 139:28–32.
19. Noguchi S, Noguchi A, Murakami N. Papillary carci­noma of the thyroid. Cancer. 1970;26:1053–60.
20. Block MA, Miller JM, Horn RC. Significance of mediast­inal lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the thyroid. Am J Surg. 1972;123:702–5.
21. Niederle B, Roka R, Fritsch A. Transsternal operations in thyroid cancer. Surgery. 1985;98:1154–61.
22. Dralle H, Scheumann GFW, Hundeshagen H, Maßmann J, Pichlmayr R. Die transsternale zervikomediastinale Prima¨rtumorresektion und Lymphadenektomie beim Schilddru¨senkarzinom. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1992; 377:34–44.
23. Dralle H, Scheumann GFW, Kotzerke J, Brabant EG. Surgical management of MEN 2. Rec Res Cancer Res. 1992;125:167–95.
24. Dralle H, Damm I, Scheumann GFW, Kotzerke J, Kupsch E, Geerlings H, Pichlmayr R. Compartment-oriented microdissection of regional lymph nodes in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Surg Today. 1994;24:112–21.
25. Qubain SW, Nakano S, Baba M, Takao S, Aikou T. Distribution of lymph node micrometastasis in pN0 well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2002; 131:249–56.
26. Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT, Levine PA, Sessions RB, PruetCW. Standardizingneck dissection terminol­ogy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117: 601–5.
27. Robbins KT, Clayman G, Levine PA, Medina J, Sessions R, Shaha A, Som P, Wolf GT and the Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, American Acad­emy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Neck dissection classification update. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:751–8.
28. Wittekind Ch. Greene FL, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH. TNM Supplement. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley­Liss; 2003;25–30.
188
ENDOCRINE SURGERY
29. Dralle H, Becker S, Scheumann GFW. Pra¨operative Diagnostik, Indikation und Technik transsternaler Ein­griffe bei benigner und maligner Struma. Schilddru¨se
1989. 9. Konferenz u¨ber die menschliche Schilddru¨se. Homburg/Saar. B¨orner W (Hrsg.) Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York, 1991.
30. Dralle H, Gimm O. Lymphadenektomie beim Schilddru¨­senkarzinom. Chirurg. 1996;67:788–806.
31. Goropoulos A, Karamoshos K, Christodoulou A, Ntit­sias T, Paulou K, Samaras A, Xirou P, Efstratiou I. Value of the cervical compartments in the surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 2004; 28:1275–81.
32. Machens A, Gimm O, Ukkat J, Hinze R, Schneyer U, Dralle H. Improved prediction of calcitonin normalization in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients by quantitative lymph node analysis. Cancer. 2000;88:1909–15.
33. Leboulleux S, Rubino C, Baudin E, Caillou B, Hartl DM, Bidard JM, Travagli JP, Schlumberger M. Prognostic factors for persistent or recurrent disease of papillary thyroid carcinoma with neck lymph node metastases and/or tumor extension beyond the thyroid capsule at initial diagnosis. J Clin EndocrinolMetab. 2005;90:5723–9.
34. Ito Y, Jikuzono T, Higashiyama T, Asahi S, Tomoda C, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis of thyroid papillary carcinoma located in one lobe. World J Surg. 2006;30:1821–8.
35. Brauckhoff M, Meinicke A, Bilkenroth U, Lorenz K, Brauckhoff K, Gimm O, Nguyen Thanh P, Dralle H. Long-term results and functional outcome after cervical evisceration in patients with thyroid cancer. Surgery. 2006;140:953–9.
36. Ahuja A, Ying M, Yuen YH, Metreweli C. PowerDoppler sonography of cervical lymphadenopathy. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:965–9.
37. Kouvaraki MA, Shapiro SE, Fornage BD, Edeiken­Monro BS, Sherman SI, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Lee JE, Evans DB. Role of preoperative ultrasonography in the surgical management of patients with thyroid cancer. Surgery. 2003;134:946–55.
38. Torlontano M, Attard M, Crocetti U, Tumino S, Bruno R, Costante G, D’Azzo G, Meringolo D, Ferretti E, Sacco R, Arturi F, Filetti S. Follow-up of low risk patients with papillary thyroid cancer: role of neck ultrasonography in detecting lymph node metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3402–7.
39. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Pre­operative ultrasonographicexamination for lymph node metastasis: usefulness when designing lymph node dis­section for papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2004;28:498–501.
40. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Papil­lary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: how should it be treated? World J Surg. 2004;28:1115–21.
41. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamure Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Ultrasonographically and anatomopathologically detectable node metastases in the lateral compartment as indicators of worse relapse-free survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 2005; 29:917–20.
42. Stulak JM, Grant CS, Farley DR, Thompson GB, van Heerden JA, Hay ID, Reading CC, Charboneau JW. Value of preoperative ultrasonography in the surgical management of initial and reoperative papillary thyroid cancer. Arch Surg. 2006; 41:489–96.
43. Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Clin­ical significance of metastasis to the central compart­ment from papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2006;30:91–9.
44. Leboulleux S, Girard E, Rose M, Travagli JP, Sabbah N, Caillou B, Hartl DM, Lassau N, Baudin E, Schlumberger M. Ultrasound criteria of malignancy for cervical lymph nodes in patients followed up for differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3590–4.
45. Wang W, Macapinlac H, Larson SM, Yeh SDJ, Akhurst T, Finn RD, Rosai J, Robbins RJ. [
18
F]-2-Fluoro-2­Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography loca­lizes residual thyroid cancer in patients with negative diagnostic
131
I whole body scans and elevated serum thyroglobulin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999; 84:2291–302.
46. Wang W, Larson SM, Fazzari M, Tickoo SK, Kolbert K, Sgouros G, Yeung H, Macapinlac H, Rosai J, Robbins RJ. Prognostic value of [
18
F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metag. 2000;85:1107–13.
47. Schlu¨ter B, Bohuslavizki KH, Beyer W, Plotkin M, Buchert R, Clausen M. Impact of FDG-PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative
131
I scan. J Nucl
Med. 2001;42:71–6.
48. Kraeber-Bodere F, Cariou B, Curtet C, Bridji B, Rous­seau C, Dravet F, Charbonnel B, Carnaille B, Le Neel JC, Mirallie E. Feasibility and benefit of fluorine 18-fluoro­2-deoxyglucose-guided surgery in the management of radioiodine-negative differentiated thyroid carcinoma metastases. Surgery. 2005;138:1176–82.
49. Robbins RJ, Wan Q, Grewal RK, Reibke R, Gonen M, Strauss HW, Tuttle RM, Drucker W, Larson SM. Real­time prognosis for metastatic thyroid carcinoma based
18
on 2-[
F]Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose-Positron emis­sion tomography scanning. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:498–505.
50. Ong SC, Sch¨oder H, Patel SG, Tabangay-Lim IM, Dodda­mane I, G¨onen M, Shaha AR, Tuttle RM, Shah JP, Larson SM. Diagnostic accuracy of
18
F-FDG PET in restaging patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:501–7.
51. Giraudet AL, Vanel D, Leboulleux S, Auperin A, Dro­main C, Chami L, Tovo NN, Lubroso J, Lassau N, Bon­niaud G, Hartl D, Travagli JP, Baudin E, Schlumberger M. Imaging medullary thyroid carcinoma with persis­tent elevated calcitonin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4185–90.
52. Kebebew E, Reiff E. Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer have a venous gradient in thyroglobulin levels. Cancer. 2007;109:1078–81.
53. Schott M, Willenberg HS, Sagert C, Nguyen TBT, Schin­ner S, Cohnen M, Cupisti K, Eisenberger CF, Knoefel WT, Scherbaum WA. Identification of occult metastases of medullary thyroid carcinoma by pentagastrin-stimu­lated intravenous calcitonin sampling followed by tar­geted surgery. Clin Endocrinol. 2007;66:405–9.
189
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN THYROID CANCER
54. Vasko V, Hu S, Wu G, Xing JC, Larin A, Savchenko V, Trink B, Mingzhao X. High prevalence and possible de novo formation of BRAF mutation in metastasized papillary thyroid cancer in lymph nodes. J Clin Endo­crinol Metab. 2005;90:5265–9.
55. Ito Y, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Papillary microcar­cinomas of the thyroid with preoperatively detectable lymph node metastasis show significantly higher aggressive characteristics on immuno-histochemical examination. Oncology. 2005;68:87–96.
56. Scheumann GFW, Gimm O, Wegener G, Hundesha­genH,DralleH.Prognosticsignificanceandsurgi­cal management of locoregional lymph node metas­tases in papillary thyroid cancer. World J Surg. 1994;18:559–68.
57. Sugitani I, Kasai N, Fujimoto Y, Yanagisawa A. A novel classification system for patients with PTC: addition of the new variables of large (3 cm or greater) nodal metas­tases and reclassification during the follow-up period. Surgery. 2004;135:139–148.
58. Ito Y, Miyauchi A. Lateral and medistinal lymph node dissection in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: indica­tions, benefits, and risks. World J Surg. 2007;31:905–15.
59. White ML.Gauger PG.Doherty GM. Centrallymph node dissection in differentiated thyroid cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:895–904.
60. Wada N, Duh QY, Sugino K, Iwasaki H, Kameyama K, Mimura T, Ito K, Takami H, Takanashi Y. Lymph node metastasis from 259 papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. Ann Surg. 2003;237:399–407.
61. Pereira JA, Jimeno J, Miquel J, Iglesias M, Munne A, Sancho JJ, Sitges-Serra A. Nodal yield, morbidity, and recurrence after central neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2005;138:1095–101.
62. Lee YS, Kim SW, Kim SW, Kim SK, Kang HS, Lee ES, Chung KW. Extent of routine central lymph node dis­section with small papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 2007;31:1954–9.
63. Ito Y, Higashiyama T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Risk factors for recurrence to the lymph node in papillary thyroid car­cinoma patients without preoperatively detectable lat­eral node metastasis: validity of prophylactic modified radical neck dissection. World J Surg. 2007;31:2085–91.
64. Henry JF, Gramatica L, Denizot A, Kvachenyuk A, Puc­cini M, Defechereux T. Morbidity of prophylactic lymph node dissection in the central neck area in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:167–9.
65. Skinner MA, Moley JA, Dilley WG, Owzar K, DeBene­detti MK, Wells SA. Prophylactic thyroidectomy in mul­tiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1105–113.
66. Sywak M, Cornfod L, Roach P, Stalberg P, Sidhu S, Del­bridge L. Routine ipsilateral level VI lymphadenectomy reduces postoperative thyroglobulin levels in papillary thyroid cancer. Surgery. 2006;140:1000–7.
67. Roh JL, Park JY, Park CI. Total thyroidectomy plus neck dissection in differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Ann Surg. 2007;245:604–10.
68. Cheah WK, Arici C, Ituarte PHG, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Clark OH. Complications of neck dissection for thyroid cancer. World J Surg. 2002;26:1013–6.
69. Short SO, Kaplan JN, Laramore GE, Cummings CW. Shoulder pain and function after neck dissection with or without preservation of the spinal accessory nerve. Am J Surg. 1984;148:478–82.
70. Sugenoya A, Asanuma K, Shingu K, Onuma H, Shimizu T, Masuda H, Kasuga Y, Kobayashi S, Iida F. Clinical evaluation of upper mediastinale dissection for differ­entiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 1993;113:541–4.
71. Feind CR, Cole RM. Contralateal spread of head and neck cancer. Am J Surg. 1969;118:660–5.
72. Carcangiu ML, Bianchi S. Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13: 1041–9.
73. Schr¨oder S, Bay V, Dumke K, Kremens B, Mu¨ller-Ga¨rt­ner HW, B¨ocker W, Kastendieck H. Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat. 1990;416:367–71.
74. Fujimoto Y. Obara T, Ito Y, Kodama T, Aiba M, Yama­guchi K. Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary carci­noma of the thyroid. Cancer. 1990;66:2306–12.
75. Albareda M, Puig-Domingo M, Wengrowicz S, Soldevila J, Matias-Guiu X, Caballero A, Chico A, De Leiva A. Clinical forms of presentation and evolution of diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary carcinoma and insular variant of follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 1998;8:385–91.
76. Lam KYA, Yau Lo C. Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid: a 35-year comparative study at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:176–81.
77. Brennan MD, Bergstralh EJ, van Heerden JA, McCona­hey WM. Follicular thyroid cancer treated at the Mayo Clinic, 1946 through 1970: initial manifestations. patho­logic findings, therapy, and outcome. Mayo Clin Proc. 1991;66:11–22.
78. van Heerden JA, Hay ID, Goellner JR, Salomao D, Eber­sold JR, Bergstralh EJ, Grant CS. Follicular thyroid car­cinoma with capsular invasion alone: a nonthreatening malignancy. Surgery. 1992;112:1130–8.
79. Shaha AR, Loree TR, Shah JP. Prognostic factors and risk group analysis in follicular carcinoma of the thyr­oid. Surgery. 1995;118:1131–8.
80. Rao RS, Parikh HK, Deshmane VH, Parikh DM, Shri­khande SS, Havaldar R. Prognostic factors in follicular carcinoma of the thyroid: a study of 198 cases. Head Neck. 1996;18:118–26.
81. Passler C, Scheuba C, Prager G, Kaczirek K, Kaserer K, Zettinig G, Niederle B. Prognostic factors of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer: differences in an iodine­replete endemic goiter region. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:131–9.
82. Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY, Wan KY. Follicular thyroid carcinoma. The role of histology and staging systems in predicting survival. Ann Surg. 2005;242:708–15.
83. Sanders LE, Silverman M. Follicular and Hu¨rthle cell carcinoma: predicting outcome and directing therapy. Surgery. 1998;124:967–74.
84. Haigh PI, Urbach DR. The treatment and prognosis of Hu¨rthle cell follicular thyroid carcinoma compared with its non-Hu¨rthle cell counterpart. Surgery. 2005;138: 1152–8.
85. Sobrinho Simoes M, Albores-Saavedra J, Tallini G, Santoro M, Volante M, Pilotti S, Carcangiu ML,
t
i M, Matias-Guiu X, Guiter GE, Zakowski M,
pot
Pa Sakamoto A. Poorly differentiated carcinoma. In: