Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1369_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •The Dawn of Endoscopy
- •The Beginnings of Laparoscopy: The Cholecystectomy
- •The Laparoscopic Colectomy
- •The COST and CLASICC Trials
- •Limitations in Rectal Surgery
- •Suggested Readings
- •Background
- •Current Credentialing and Privileges in Robotics
- •Robotic Training Development and Research
- •Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS)
- •References
- •Background
- •References
- •Technique
- •Si Port Placement
- •Xi Port Placement
- •Personal Experience and Outcomes
- •Discussion
- •Single-Incision Robotic Colectomy (SIRC)
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Indications and Contraindications
- •Preoperative Workup (Including Images)
- •Operative Details
- •Patient Positioning
- •Port Setup
- •Details of Procedure
- •Robotic Mobilization of Sigmoid Colon and Ligation of Vessels
- •Perineal Resection
- •Closure
- •Postoperative Care
- •Possible Complications
- •Follow-Up
- •Tips and Tricks
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Hybrid Technique
- •Patient Positioning and Preparation
- •Port Placement
- •Patient Cart Positioning and Docking
- •Procedure Steps
- •Operative Outcome
- •Totally Robotic Technique
- •Single Docking Method
- •Port Placement
- •Port Usage and Instrument Arm Setup per Procedure Step
- •Operative Outcome
- •Dual Docking Method
- •Port Placement
- •Patient Cart Positioning and Docking
- •Operative Outcome
- •Port Placement for New Robot System
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •Operating Room Setup and Preparation
- •Trocar Placements
- •Docking
- •Operative Steps
- •Description of Operative Steps
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •Eligibility and Indications
- •Indications for R-TAMIS
- •Indications for R-TAMIS-TME
- •The Role of Chemoradiation Therapy
- •Preoperative Study
- •Positioning Robotic TAMIS
- •Ports and Trocars
- •Operative Steps
- •TAMIS
- •Operative Steps TAMIS-TME (Transanal Stage)
- •Other Procedures
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Indocyanine Green (ICG)
- •NIR Imaging Systems
- •Current MIS Colorectal IF Studies
- •Laparoscopic Studies
- •Robotic Studies
- •PILLAR II
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Background
- •Preoperative Assessment
- •Technical Considerations
- •Postoperative Management
- •Patient Positioning, Preparation, and Port Placement with the da Vinci Si System
- •Patient Positioning, Preparation, and Port Placement with the da Vinci Xi System
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectopexy with Anterior Mesh Fixation
- •References
- •Introduction to Robotics for Repair of Pelvic Floor Disorders
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Prolapse
- •Background
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Technical Considerations
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectopexy with Posterior Mesh Fixation
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection with Rectopexy
- •Complications
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Uterine and/or Vaginal Vault Prolapse
- •Background
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Technical Considerations
- •Patient Positioning, Preparation, and Port Placement for the da Vinci Si System
- •Patient Positioning, Preparation, and Port Placement for the da Vinci Xi System
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, with or Without Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy, and Sacrocolpopexy
- •Complications
- •Multidisciplinary Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- •Background
- •Preoperative Evaluation and Management
- •Technical Considerations
- •Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Concomitant Rectopexy, with or Without Resection
- •Complications
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Ulcerative Colitis
- •Surgical Technique
- •Total Proctocolectomy with IPAA: Complete Robotic Approach
- •Total Proctocolectomy with IPAA: Laparoscopic, Robotic-Assisted Approach
- •Robotic-Assisted Completion Proctectomy
- •Crohn’s Disease
- •Surgical Technique
- •Robotic-Assisted Single Incision Colectomy
- •Robotic-Assisted Strictureplasty
- •References
- •Introduction
- •History of Ergonomics and Surgery
- •Components of Surgical Ergonomics
- •Visualization
- •Posture
- •Electromyography
- •Manipulation
- •Ergonomics of Assisting in Minimally Invasive Surgery
- •Challenges of Robotics and Ergonomics
- •Summary and Future Directions of Study
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy and Physiology of Urinary and Sexual Function
- •Key Points for Nerve-Sparing Surgery and Surgical-Related Lesions
- •Instrument Use and Surgical Techniques
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Single Institution Studies for Robotic Colectomy
- •Retrospective and Comparative Studies for Robotic Colectomy
- •Studies Evaluating the Robotic Approach for Rectal Resection
- •Retrospective and Comparative Studies for Rectal Resection
- •Comparisons Between Robotic and Open Colectomy
- •Comparisons Between Robotic and Open for Rectal Resection
- •Meta-analyses and Reviews
- •Randomized Controlled Trials
- •Comparing Laparoscopic and Open
- •Comparing Laparoscopic and Robotic
- •Summary
- •Related Issues
- •Conversions
- •Learning Curve
- •Sexual and Urinary Dysfunction
- •Intracorporeal Anastomosis and Incisional Hernias
- •Minimally Invasive Single Incision Surgery
- •Transanal Approach to Rectal Neoplasia
- •Cost
- •Future Directions
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Section 1: Introduction of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
- •Background
- •Introduction of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
- •The Cost Challenge of RALS
- •Section 2: Changing the Paradigm
- •Targeting Open Surgery
- •Creating a Market Niche
- •Streamlining Instrumentation
- •Increasing Case Volume
- •Instituting Quality Control Metrics
- •Marketplace Competition
- •Section 3: RALS Versus Laparoscopic Surgery: An Institutional Study of Patients and Financial Outcomes
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Background
- •Pathophysiology
- •Epidemiology
- •Symptoms
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment of Endometriosis
- •Medical Therapy
- •Surgical Therapy
- •Preoperative Assessment
- •Surgical Technique
- •Gynecologic Approach to Robotic-Assisted Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis
- •Colorectal Approach to Robotic-Assisted Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •Background
- •Preoperative Concerns
- •Patient Selection
- •Monitoring and Vascular Access
- •Intraoperative Concerns
- •Cardiopulmonary Complications
- •Subcutaneous Emphysema and Potential Sequela
- •CO2 Embolism
- •Hypothermia
- •Positioning Complications
- •Surgical Injury
- •Appropriate Surgical Environment
- •Postoperative Concerns
- •Multimodal Approach to Pain
- •Local Anesthetics
- •Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction to Robotic Single-Port Approach
- •Single-Port Devices and Instruments
- •Preoperative Patient Evaluation and Preparation
- •Operative Technique
- •Positioning and Umbilical Access
- •Trocar Placement and Robot Docking
- •Right hemicolectomy
- •Left Hemicolectomy
- •Closure of Incision and Wound Care
- •Postoperative Care
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Pneumoperitoneum
- •Robotic Malfunction
- •Reoperation and Adhesions
- •Intraoperative Complications
- •Robotic Stapling
- •Conclusion
- •Key Points
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Limitations of Current Robotic Surgery Platform
- •Upcoming Surgical Platforms
- •Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- •TransEnterix
- •Titan Medical Inc.
- •SOFAR S.p.A
- •Telesurgery
- •Robotic Endoscopy
- •Soft Colonoscopy Robotic Platform
- •Endotics
- •GI View Ltd.
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Acknowledgements
- •Index

Vincent Obias Editor
Robotic Colon and
Rectal Surgery
Principles and Practice
123

Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery

Vincent Obias
Editor
Robotic Colon and Rectal
Surgery
Principles and Practice

Editor
Vincent Obias
Department of Surgery Division of Colon
and Rectal Surgery
George Washington University
Washington, DC, USA
ISBN 978-3-319-43254-0 ISBN 978-3-319-43256-4 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43256-4
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016962016
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of
the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information
storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the
editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors
or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims
in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Printed on acid-free paper
This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature
The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

This book is dedicated to all of the surgeons
who are courageous enough to thoughtfully
utilize a new technology or technique to
improve the outcomes of their patients, to
question these advancements, to critically
review and publish their results, and, once
these surgeons are comfortable with their
mastery, to continue to innovate and try new
ideas.

Foreword
Issac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being
to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders
would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not con-
flict with the First or Second Laws.
Robotics, in its current form, is not the robot from fiction and movies. Rather, it is
a mechanized computer interface that augments a surgeon’s innate abilities. Robotic
surgery is a natural continuation of minimally invasive surgery that was pioneered by
laparoscopists and endoscopists. As has been the case in many instances in science
and industry, the advent of robotics has disrupted the status quo and has helped move
the field of surgery forward. At its base, robotics is a mechanized computer interface
between the surgeon and the patient. However, instead of separating the patient from
the surgeon, robotic draws the surgeon closer with incredible 3D views and fine
wristed instruments. As technology continues its exponential pace, future iterations
of robotic platforms will look radically different from what we have used as pioneers, but the basic surgeon-computer-patient paradigm will always be there.
It is with great pleasure that I introduce the reader to the first edition of this textbook. The genesis of this textbook was rooted in the realization that current robotic
colorectal textbooks were being written and edited by surgeons who did not do
robotics. All of the main authors in this textbook have done over 100 robotic
colorectal procedures and are experts in the field. They truly support and endorse
robotics in colorectal surgery and their enthusiasm shines through in the chapters
they have written.
Thank you for reading this textbook. I hope you enjoy this labor of love.
1
1
Asimov, Issac, I, Robot. 1950.
Vincent J. Obias, MD, MS, FASCRS, FACS
vii

Contents
1 Introduction: The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Surgery ............. 1
Jeremy L. Holzmacher and Samir Agarwal
2 The Learning Curve of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic
Colorectal Surgery and How to Start Applying Robotic
Technology in Colorectal Surgery ......................................................... 11
M. Nicole Lamb and Ovunc Bardakcioglu
3 Training and Credentialing in Robotics ................................................ 17
Ryan Broderick, Simone Langness, and Sonia Ramamoorthy
4 Robotic Right Hemicolectomy ............................................................... 23
Henry J. Lujan, Brian X. Rivera, and Diego Holguin
5 Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection ................................................... 49
Grace S. Hwang, John Gahagan, and Alessio Pigazzi
6 Robotic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer .............................. 59
Se-Jin Baek and Seon-Hahn Kim
7 Robotic Total Colectomy ........................................................................ 79
Cesar Santiago and Sean Satey
8 Robotic-Assisted Transanal Microscopic Surgery ............................... 93
Borja Villanueva Figueredo, Federico Perez Quirante,
Carlos Martinez Parra, Jorge A. Lagares-Garcia, and Anthony Firilas
9 Surgical Immunofluorescence and Firefly Technology
in Colon and Rectal Surgery .................................................................. 105
Elizabeth R. Raskin
10 Surgery on Obese Patients ..................................................................... 115
Eduardo Parra Davila and Carlos Hartmann Otero
11 Robotics and Pelvic Floor ....................................................................... 129
Nell Maloney-Patel, Juana Hutchinson-Colas, and Ashley Tsang
ix

x
Contents
12 Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Inflammatory
Bowel Disease .......................................................................................... 153
Michelle DeLeon and Craig Rezac
13 Ergonomics in Robotic Colorectal Surgery .......................................... 169
John G. Armstrong and John C. Byrn
14 Nerve Preservation in Robotic Rectal Surgery .................................... 183
Fabrizio Luca and Manuela Valvo
15 Completed and Ongoing Trials in Robotic Colorectal Surgery .......... 195
Robert K. Cleary
16 Robotic Costs ........................................................................................... 229
Deborah S. Keller and Eric M. Haas
17 The Robotic-Assisted Treatment of Endometriosis:
A Colorectal Surgical Perspective ......................................................... 243
Maria Victoria Vargas, Gaby Moawad, Vincent Obias,
and Madiha Aziz
18 Anesthesia in Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery ................................ 259
Christopher Schroff and Jason Sankar
19 Single-Incision Robotic Colon Resection (SIRC) ................................. 271
Yen-Yi Juo and Vincent Obias
20 Intraoperative Conversions in Robotic Colorectal Surgery ............... 285
Matthew Skancke and Vincent Obias
21 Current and Future Platforms for Robotic Colorectal Surgery ......... 295
Jeffrey N. Harr and Deborah Nagle
Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 311
Index ................................................................................................................. 313

Chapter 1
Introduction: The Evolution of Minimally
Invasive Surgery
Jeremy L. Holzmacher and Samir Agarwal
Perhaps the most invigorating and daunting challenge to the modern day surgeon is
the continual drive to push the envelope of what is innovative, fast, and cost effective. Likewise, surgeons must at all times maintain patient safety and provide treatments that are as efficacious as the current standard of care. As surgery began
forming into a cogent specialty in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century,
foundational strides were made in advancing antisepsis and sterility along with
updating the current body of anatomic knowledge. Around this same time, the
developing interest in the basic sciences lead to the birth of the surgeon scientist
who formally set to define the pathological basis for surgical disease. William
Stewart Halsted was one of the key figures in removing the general surgeon from the
paradigm of the surgeon barber of the 1800s into the surgeon scientist of the twentieth century. This was part and parcel to his pursuit of the scientific of surgical
diseases, and in many respects set the tone of translational research from the laboratory to the operating room. Of course, his achievements were built upon meticulous
and often tireless efforts of the great surgeons that came before him. Physicians who
explored nearly every cavity, crevice, and orifice of the human body and for whom
so many eponyms exist.
As the century progressed, a wave of new technologies began surfacing which
would come to empower both diagnostic and therapeutic medicine. Henry Dakin
and Nobel laureate Alexis Carrel did extensive research into wound management
during World War I, leading to major advancements in wound healing by experimenting with antisepsis solutions and the evolving practice of debridement and
irrigation. By World War II, most of the foundations for basic operative procedures
had been established and the subsequent growth of surgical procedures from the
J.L. Holzmacher, M.D. • S. Agarwal, M.D. (*)
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, George Washington
University, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 6B,
Washington 20037, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, USA
e-mail: samag960@gmail.com
V. Obias (ed.), Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43256-4_1
1© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

2
J.L. Holzmacher and S. Agarwal
1940s onward became nearly exponential. Diseases, which were lethal only
decades earlier, could now be treated in a precise and nuanced fashion. The modern era of major open surgery had come, it was radical in breadth and scope, and
the evolution of surgery as a field had only begun.
The Dawn of Endoscopy
While open surgery dominated as the sole intervention for surgical disease for the
majority of the twentieth century, concurrent advances in catheter-based and endoscopic technology set the foundation for what would become minimally invasive
surgery. In their infancy, however, minimally invasive approaches were largely
regarded as ineffective for interventional means. Indeed, the adoption of minimally
invasive procedures like endoscopy by thoracic and abdominal surgeons was
delayed largely by two key factors: (1) endoscopy was deemed inferior to the gold
standard of open surgery, especially when dealing with enclosed intracorporeal
cavities; and (2) the technology of endoscopes was limited by their lack of videoimaging capabilities, high definition visualizations, and insufficient lighting for
the operating surgeon and their assistants to perform meaningful maneuvers.
Consequently, surgeons sparingly performed endoscopy leaving a vacuum through
which other specialties would advance the field. The toils and triumphs of these
pioneers are as expansive as the achievements of the great major operative surgeons of the time.
Kurt Semm, a gynecologist, succeeded in developing an electronic insufflator
with trocar systems that allowed introduction and removal of instruments without
losing intra-abdominal pressure, and his performance of the first laparoscopic
appendectomies (Figs. 1.1 and 1.2). The radiologist Benjamin Orndoff began experimenting with “peritoneoscopy” and was able to establish pneumoperitoneum using
an intraspinal needle by insufflating oxygen. Similarly, Janos Veress developed a
modified intraspinal needle to instill pneumothorax for the treatment of tuberculosis, later to be adopted for introduction of pneumoperitoneum (Fig. 1.3). George
Kelling, a gastroenterologist, experimented feverishly with methods of insufflation
and insufflating gases, as well as conceptualizing and describing the beginnings of
what would ultimately become modern day laparoscopic instruments (Fig. 1.4). A
true endoscopist, George Berci of Austria led advances in miniaturizing videoimaging technology within endoscopes and improving endoscopic illumination,
setting the stage for high definition televised laparoscopes for visualizing intracavitary anatomy (Figs. 1.5 and 1.6).
Surgery via laparoscopy, however, was not first successfully performed until the
early 1980s by European surgeons using their own personal techniques for cholecystectomy. The legitimacy of endoscopy became solidified in 1987 when the
French physician P. Mouret who performed a four trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy successfully in a young woman.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
