Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3860_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
394 J. J. Trambert
https://t.me/med1917
A
B
FIGURE 32-4. Cholangiographic appearances of bile duct pathologies. A–C: Nonmalignant diseases. Calculi typically produce
intraluminal rounded filling defects or meniscus-shaped lumen termination (A). Extrinsic inflammatory disease (chronic cholecys-
titis, pancreatitis) usually produces a rounded compression of the adjacent bile duct (B). Postoperative fibrotic strictures usually
appear as a short, focal stricture or short segmental duct occlusion (C). Malignant diseases (D). Suggestive cholangiographic
features include ragged lumen termination (e.g., ampullary carcinoma, polypoid primary bile duct carcinoma), “rat tail”-shaped
lumen termination (e.g., encasement by pancreatic carcinoma) and long irregular strictures (e.g., primary bile duct carcinoma,
duct encasement by extrinsic tumor).
C
D
ding lesion and revision of the bile duct, which has the
potential for long-term cure and is feasible in patients
with nonmalignant strictures in such anatomic locations
that complete resection of the stricture still allows for
tension-free anastomoses. In many medical centers, this
category is limited to lesions in the extrahepatic duct
(CHD or CBD). Occasionally, malignant strictures can be
curatively resected and bypassed. Sclerosing cholangitis
involving only the extrahepatic duct (unusual) is also
amenable to surgical bypass. One study noted an 88%
five-year sympton-free outcome in patients who underwent surgical correction of benign postoperative stric-
4
tures.
In patients in whom surgery is not a viable option,
percutaneous biliary intervention should be considered.

The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 395
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 32-1. Biliary Strictures—Location versus Etiology
Intrahepatic bile duct strictures
Cholangiocarcinoma
Encasement by liver metastases or hepatoma
Sclerosing cholangitis
Hepatic duct confluence, common hepatic duct
Cholangiocarcinoma
Gallbladder carcinoma
Metastatic porta hepatis lymphadenopathy
Postoperative strictures
Common hepatic duct, Common bile duct
Bile duct carcinoma
Pancreatic carcinoma
Lymphoma, or other metastatic hepato-duodenal ligament
lymphadenopathy
Chronic pancreatitis
Postoperative stricture
Distal common bile duct, Ampulla
Pancreatic carcinoma
Ampullary carcinoma
Percutaneous biliary interventions include biliary drainage catheter placement, antegrade placement of internal
bile duct stents, bile duct stricture balloon dilatation,
percutaneous cholecystostomy, and gallstone extraction.
Percutaneous biliary drainage
Indications
The main indications for percutaneous biliary drainage
(PBD) are the relief of jaundiceresulting from inoperable
obstruction or relief of septic cholangitis. Many patients
who present with obstructive jaundice are unfitfor surgery
because their disease istoo advanced (i.e., short life expectancy), they are poor medical risks for the required major
surgery that the biliary reconstruction requires, or the
offending lesions are in anatomic positions that are not
amenable to durable surgical bypass (e.g., the intrahepatic
ducts or hepatic duct confluence.) Such patients are committed to transcatheter prosthesis palliation. Such a prosthesis can be placed either by retrograde endoscopic approach or by percutaneous transhepatic access. Patients
with obstructive jaundice who are surgical candidates but
who have septic cholangitis should undergo external
biliary drainage to allow resolution of the cholangitis before surgery. The value of preoperative percutaneous
biliary drainage in patients who arenot septic is controversial because there is no published evidence to suggest that
preoperative reduction of the bilirubin level has any beneficial effect on subsequent surgical morbidity or mortal-
5,6
ity.
Despite this lack of published proof, many surgeons
believe that preoperative drainage is of some benefit and
➚
➙
➘
FIGURE 32-5. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram
(PTC) demonstrating smooth extrinsic compression of common hepatic duct (CHD) and common bile duct (CBD) (
secondary to chronic cholecystitis (Mirizzi syndrome).
arrows
FIGURE 32-6. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) revealing a smoothly tapered common bile
duct (CBD) stricture due to chronic pancreatitis (
). Corroborating this diagnosis are the faintly visible ad-
arrow
jacent pancreatic head calcifications (
)
note contrast in the distened irregular pancreatic duct (
white arrows
).
solid white arrow
curved white
). Also
hollow

396 J. J. Trambert
https://t.me/med1917
A B
FIGURE 32-7. Metastatic adenocarcinoma to liver and porta hepatis nodes. A: T-tube cholangiogram showing stricture involving
main hepatic duct (HD) confluence and proximal common hepatic duct (CHD) caused by encasement by porta hepatis
lymphadenopathy (
encasement by the liver parenchymal metastases. The resultant multifocal strictures and beadlike appearance of virtually all the
opacified ducts shown here are cholangiographically similar to primary sclerosing cholangitis and diffuse cholangiocarcinoma.
continue to refer patients. Furthermore, many surgeons
prefer mapping by PTC before bile duct revision, and if
this study discloses biliary obstruction, decompression is
mandated.
arrow
). B: Retrograde selective right cholangiogram via T-tube tract demonstrating diffuse intrahepatic duct
IV, prior to the procedure, and 1 g every 6 hr for 48 hr in
addition to gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg IV, preprocedure followed by 1.5 mg/kg IV, every 8 hr for 48 hr.
A suitable skin entry site is chosen in the region of the
right mid to anterior axillary line over the right upper
Method
If present, coagulopathies need to be corrected before
percutaneous biliary intervention. Preprocedure and
periprocedure antibiotics are mandatory to minimize the
risk of sepsis from biliary duct manipulation. Antibiotic
prophylaxis usually consists of intravenous (IV) cefazolin
or cefoxitin 1 g before the procedure and 1 g every 8 hr
for 48 hr. A common alternative would be ampicillin 2 g
quadrant of the abdomen. The exact location is guided
by fluoroscopic obser vation of the liver and diaphragm,
taking care to choose an approach with minimum risk of
a transpleural tract. Fluoroscopic observation of a metal
marker at the planned entry site while the patient takes a
deep breath is usually enough to accomplish this step.
The tract, by necessity, is almost always intercostal. Entry
should be over the lower rib rather than under the upper

The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 397
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 32-9. Percutaneous transhepatic external biliary
drainage catheter. Transcatheter cholangiogram shows typical
“rat tail” rapid taper common bile duct (CBD) obstruction
caused by pancreatic carcinoma (
arrow
).
FIGURE 32-8. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)
demonstrating a cholangiocarcinoma involving the confluence
of the right and left hepatic ducts and proximal common hepatic duct. Left hepatic ducts are totally obstructed. This type
of lesion is sometimes referred to as a
Klatzkin tumor.
rib of the intercostal space to minimize risk of trauma to
the intercostal artery and irritation of the intercostal
nerve that might render the drainage catheter more
painful.
Adequate conscious sedation is needed because percutaneous biliary manipulation can be quite painful, especially in patients with fibrotic livers resistant to catheter
advancement. Lidocaine anesthesia is given along the
tract from the skin to the peritoneum. Then a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram is performed by advancing a 21- or 22-gauge needle into the liver. Dilute contrast
is infused gently into the needle as it is slowly retracted
under fluoroscopic obser vation until the characteristic
pattern of bile duct filling is identified. This is manifested
by filling of tubular lumina with contrast that does not
wash away (Fig. 32-10A). In attempting to opacify the
biliary tree, the needle tip may traverse or lodge in a
portal vein, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, or lymphatic.
Each of these nonbiliary lumina has a characteristic orientation and appearance that differentiate it from a bile
duct, and contrast invariably will wash out of the lumen
in all of these nonbiliary structures.
Once a biliary radicle is entered, contrast is injected
slowly and gently. Care should be exercised to avoid overdistension of the obstructed biliary tree, which could
increase the chance of sepsis. A few milliliters of contrast
are injected, followed by aspiration of an equal number
of milliliters through the same needle to progressively
exchange bile for contrast to visualize as much of the
biliary tree as possible. Because iodinated water soluble
contrast flows into the most dependent locations, tilting
the patient semiupright can be helpful in allowing opacification of the central bile ducts with less overall volume
of injected contrast. When sufficient anatomy is apparent, diagnostic images are obtained. The definitive drainage procedure is completed by the originally entered
duct, if it is suitable in location and vector or by advancing another needle into a more suitable duct under fluoroscopic guidance (see Fig 32-10B). A rotating C-arm
fluoroscopy unit is most helpful for delineating the threedimensional array of the biliary system in planning definitive access. Coaxial micropuncture access systems are
used most often to achieve definitive drainage, either by
the initial PTC site or by a different duct (see Fig. 32-10).

398 J. J. Trambert
https://t.me/med1917
A
C
External biliary drainage usually is completed by positioning an 8 Fr pigtail catheter proximal to the obstruction and connecting it to a drainage bag. If internal
stenting is desired, the stricture or obstruction must be
crossed. Crossing the stricture or obstruction is accomplished by a torque catheter, such as a cobra or Levin
shape (Cook) and a soft tip Bentson guidewire (Cook) or
hydrophilic glide wire (Terumo) to facilitate atraumatic
passage through the blockage to the bowel. If the lesion
cannot be crossed easily on the first day, then an external
drainage catheter is temporarily left in place upstream of
the obstruction, and another attempt to cross the lesion
is made a few days later. External bile decompression
allows for a decrease in the inflammation and edema,
thereby making it easier to cross the obstruction at a later
date. Furthermore, external bile decompression will less-
FIGURE 32-10. Procedure for performing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in a patient with adenocarcinoma metastatic to liver and porta hepatis nodes: sequential steps. A:
Thin-needle percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC).
The particular duct entered is not suitable for definitive
catheterization because of the unfavorable direction of entry,
which would direct subsequent wires and catheters peripherally. B: After opacification of bile ducts by skinny-needle PTC,
more favorably oriented peripheral right hepatic duct tributary
then was entered with the skinny needle and 0.018-inch diameter wire (
initial duct puncture for PTC (
dilation over 0.018-inch diameter wire, a working catheter was
used to cross more distal strictures for internal-external drainage catheter placement. Intrahepatic duct strictures (
arrows
mon hepatic duct stricture (
nopathy in porta hepatis and hepaticoduodenal ligament.
solid white arrows
) caused by duct encasement by liver metastases. Com-
) advanced centrally. The site of
open arrow
large arrow
). C:. After coaxial
small
) caused by lymphade-
en the risk of procedure-related sepsis if multiple manipulations are needed to cross a lesion. It is rare that an
obstruction cannot be traversed on either the first or
second attempt.
Complications
Pain control can be difficult, especially when advancing
catheters through severely fibrotic livers. This problem is
compounded by the presence of a history of chronic
alcohol or narcotic abuse with consequent tolerance to
analgesic drugs.
Despite prophylactic antibiotics, blood-borne infection
still occurs in 2 to 12% of patients treated.
5,7,8
A pneumothorax and a biliary pleural fistula are additional risks,
given the proximity of the working area to the diaphragm
and pleural space. One or both of these complications
B

FIGURE 32-11. Hepatic artery branch pseudoaneurysm com-
https://t.me/med1917
plicating chronic biliary catheter drainage that was successfully
treated by superselective transcatheter embolotherapy.
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 399
ing a leg bag. External drainage is also nonphysiologic;
the fluid and electrolytes in the excreted bile are lost and
careful fluid replacement may become necessary. For this
reason, external biliary drainage is not an acceptable
long-term option when it is possible to traverse the obstruction.
The second arrangement is “internal-external” biliary
drainage (see Fig. 32-12). Advantages of this arrangement are that bile drains back into the patient eliminating the fluid and electrolyte loss, and the catheter can be
exchanged easily over a guidewire. The disadvantages
include annoyance to the patient of a prosthesis protruding from the skin, which can affect the patient’s lifestyle
and self-image as well as the small but finite risk of introducing an infection.
A third option is placement of an indwelling stent. The
advantage of this option is that no catheters protrude
from the skin; therefore, patients are not burdened by an
externally protruding prosthesis. The disadvantage of totally internal stents is that they do obstruct eventually,
and then they must be exchanged or revised either transendoscopically or by a new percutaneous transhepatic
biliary access procedure.
were noted in approximately 8% of percutaneous biliary
drainage procedures.
8
Clinically significant bleeding is encountered in 4 to
15% of percutaneous biliary drainage procedures.
5,9
Fortunately, hepatic artery extravasation or pseudoaneurysms complicating PTC and biliar y drainage (Fig. 32-
11) are amenable to percutaneous transcatheter
embolotherapy. Ascites increases the risk of complications, particularly that of intraperitoneal hemorrhage.
Without ascites, the close apposition of the hepatic capsule to the parietal peritoneum provides a tamponade
effect. This advantage is lost when the punctured or lacerated hepatic capsule is surrounded by fluid. In addition, the presence of ascites between the abdominal wall
and the liver renders percutaneous biliary drainage or
stent placement more difficult. Guidewires and catheters
are more likely to buckle and coil in that space when
attempts are made to advance them through the liver
parenchyma; use of a sheath can be helpful in this situation. These difficulties are often circumvented by performing PBD left biliary drainage from the anterior approach (usually because of gravity there is less ascites
anterior) or removing some of the ascites by paracentesis
prior to biliary drainage. An internal stent can also be
placed via a transjugular, transhepatic approach, thereby
avoiding the peritoneal cavity.
10
Biliary drainage options
There are three biliary drainage options. The first is
external drainage (see Fig. 32-9). The disadvantage of
this arrangement is that the patient is committed to wear-
Endoscopic or percutaneous stent placement
Most biliary stents are placed transendoscopically at many
institutions, including ours. Percutaneous stent placement is preferred in the following situations: (a) in high
biliary strictures or obstructions where it is technically
more successful than endoscopic stenting or (b) unfavorable anatomy such as gastric outlet obstruction or presence of a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Percutaneous
FIGURE 32-12. Percutaneous transhepatic internal–external
biliary drainage catheter. Patient with encasement of virtually
entire common hepatic duct–common bile duct (CHD–CBD) by
metastatic breast carcinoma (
catheter sideholes proximal to obstruction are faintly visible
solid black arrows
(
arrow
).
). Catheter pigtail is in duodenum (
open arrows
). Some of the
curved

400
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Trambert
stent placement may often succeed when strictures are
refractory to endoscopic retrograde advancement of the
stent.
Plastic stents
Probably the most common plastic stent that has been in
use by interventional radiologists is the Carey Coons stent
(Medi-Tech Inc.), a straight plastic tube with side holes
along itslength and a nylon string attached to its proximal
end that can be used to retract the stent if it is initially
advanced too far. The string then is connected to a Silastic
button, which is embedded in subcutaneous tissue via a
small 1.5-cm incision. The nylon string thus prevents stent
dislodgement and migration. It is sometimes possible to
regain entry into the bile duct containing the proximal
end of the stent by reexposing the silastic button, mobilizing the nylon string, tying a suture to the string, and then
advancing a small catheter over this suture-nylon string
guidewire into the bile duct, allowing a possible stent ex-
11
change or replacement.
Stent exchange can be accomplished by engaging the old occluded stent coaxially with
an angioplasty balloon, pushing it into the duodenum or
jejunum, and placing a new stent over the guidewire. The
old stent almost invariably passes through the bowel by
peristalsis and out with the stool.
Internal plastic stents have an average life expectancy
12
of 3 to 4 months.
Frequently, patients treated with stents
for malignant obstructions die before their stents occlude. Sometimes, however, patients can survive for 1 or
2 years following the palliative stent bypass. This is particularly true of slow growing, indolent malignancies such
as some cholangiocarcinomas or rarely in the case of slow
growing pancreatic carcinomas.
A patient with nonmalignant strictures may require
stenting, perhaps because the stricture has failed more
than one attempt at operative repair, has an anatomically
unfavorable location for operative repair (such as intrahepatic strictures or multiple strictures), or has failed balloon dilatation treatment. Patients with refractory nonmalignant strictures may have a normal lifespan if their
bile flow and hepatic integrity are maintained either by
stenting or in selected situations by liver transplantation.
Such patients will outlive their stents, therefore, longterm stent maintenance and possible replacement must
be considered at the time of stent placement.
When internal–external stenting is used, the stent may
be exchanged easily over a guidewire, a simple outpatient
procedure, usually done prophylactically every 3 months,
treating the patient with one dose of antibiotics (like
those administered for percutaneous biliary drainage) before the exchange. Unfortunately, an exchange is more
complicated for patients who have internal stents. Exchange of internal stents, if not possible endoscopically,
requires a new percutaneous transhepatic bile duct ac-
cess, with its associated discomfort and potential complications.
One of the major disadvantages of placing large plastic
stents from the percutaneous approach is the need for a
transhepatic tract at minimum the size of the stent caliber
(usually 12–14Fr). Thus, the risks of bleeding and pain
from stent advancement, particularly through afibrotic or
cirrhotic liver, are increased. In the past, this problem was
ameliorated by the combined percutaneous–endoscopic
team approach to stent placement. Because lower profile
metallic stent for malignant etiologies have replaced plastic stents in many institutions, this potential problem is
encountered much less frequently.
Percutaneous transhepatic stent placement
The percutaneous placement of an internal biliary stent involves
the advancement of the stent transhepatically over a
guidewire and carefully positioning it across the obstruction.
Plastic stents are advanced over the guidewire using a
“pusher catheter,” which is retracted after the stent is in
position. Expandable metal stents are positioned on their
delivery device and then deployed either by retraction of
a containment membrane or sheath (Wallstent and Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent, respectively) or by balloonexpansion
(Palmaz stent). Expandable metal stents are discussed in
greater detail later. When the internal stent is in position,
an external catheter usually is temporarily positioned upstream of the stent. The external catheter is removed
when adequate internal stent function has been confirmed clinically and cholangiographically and external
drainage or transhepatic access is no longer needed.
Percutaneous–endoscopic team approach
The combined antegrade–retrograde team approach involves
creation of a catheter tract from the skin through the
biliary obstruction to the bowel. A transhepatic entry into
the biliary tree is made, and the interventional radiologist
advances a guidewire across the obstruction and out into
the bowel; the wire is then grasped by the endoscopist and
retracted out through the oral cavity. Retrograde transoral stent placement is then made possible because the
guidewire can be held taut at both ends.
When the stent is safely in position, the guidewire is
removed, which allows the advancement of a 12 Fr stent
while only needing a 4 or 5 Fr tract in the skin and liver
parenchyma, resulting in a significant decrease in pain
and morbidity.
13
Expandable metal stents
The advantage of the expandable metal stent is that it can
be introduced through a small transhepatic tract, and it
then expands, either by inherent spring tension or balloon dilatation to a much larger caliber than the introducer itself. The stents available in the United States

that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration
https://t.me/med1917
(FDA) for use in the biliary system include the Wallstent
(Schneider Incorporated), the Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent
(Cook Incorporated), and the Palmaz stent (Johnson
and Johnson). The Wallstent and Gianturco-Rosch Zstent are self-expanding (Fig. 32-13). The Palmaz stent
requires balloon expansion. In Europe, the Strecker stent
is also available, but this stent is not yet approved for use
in the United States.
The most popular stents for use in the bile ducts are the
Wallstent and the Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent. At my institution, the Wallstent is used most frequently. The Wallstent
introducer is only 7 Fr, and some interventionalists place
them without using a sheath (7 Fr ID, 8.5 Fr OD). This
means the maximumsize transhepatic tract needed is only
7-8.5Fr compared to the 12–14 Fr tract needed to place a
Carey-Coons type plastic stent. Unlike the plastic stents
with lumina of only 4 mm or smaller, the Wallstent and
Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent can expand to 10 mm or larger.
It would seem that a 10 mm diameter lumen would
remain patent longer than a 4 mm plastic stent lumen.
Initially, this impression was not corroborated by experience; however, one recent double-blind trial comparing
plastic stents and Wallstents shows an approximately twofold patency duration advantage for Wallstents compared
with plastic stents1.
14
This, in addition to the decreased
pain and morbidity involved in the transhepatic placement of expandable metal stents, offsets the disadvantage
of their relatively high price (the cost of a single metal
stent is approximately 20 times higher than that of a
plastic stent).
Self-expanding metal stents, despite their larger maximum lumen, do occlude. Occlusion occurs either by tumor overgrowth at the ends of the stent, bile inspissation,
or, less commonly, tumor ingrowth through the wire mesh
of the stent. Tumor overgrowth at stent ends can be forestalled by careful positioning of the stent and by selection
of a stent at least 1 cm longer than the stricture at either
end. Not much can be done to prevent bile sludge inspissation occlusion, and patients differ in their propensity
for this problem. Some interventional radiologists believe
that the Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent is more susceptible to
tumor ingrowth through the stent interstices than the
Wallstent, which possesses a much tighter wire mesh. Covered stents may have the potential to decrease or eliminate the problem of occlusion caused by tumor ingrowth,
but they are currently under investigation.
Unlike plastic stents that can be removed and exchanged transendoscopically or percutaneously, expandable metal stents are permanent implants. As such, revision of occluded stents consists of balloon dilation of the
stent lumen, flushing out inspissated bile, removing tumor ingrowth by atherectomy, or deploying a second
stent coaxially within the original stent. This second stent
can be an internal metallic or plastic stent. Many inter-
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas
FIGURE 32-13. Self-expanding Wallstent deployed across a
malignant common bile duct (CBD) obstruction. A: Immediately after deployment, a stent lumen within a tumor of approximately only 2 mm diameter (
after deployment, the stent within the tumor has self-dilated to
approximately 7 mm diameter (
black arrowheads
black arrowheads
). B: Te n d a y s
).
401
A
B

402
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Trambert
ventional radiologists prefer to place internal-external
plastic stents through the occluded metal stent from a
transhepatic approach. Tumor overgrowth at the end of
a stent can be treated by deploying a second stent partly
overlapping the first stent.
Because metal stents are permanent implants, there is
general reluctance to use them to treat nonmalignant
biliary strictures, but metal stents have replaced plastic
ones for treatment of malignant disease in an increasing
number of inter ventional radiologists’ practices.
Percutaneous balloon dilation of nonmalignant
biliary strictures
Most nonmalignant strictures are amenable to surgical
repair with good long-term results. Patients whose strictures recur after previous operative repair or are not in a
favorable anatomic position for surgical repair (e.g., intrahepatic duct strictures) or patients who decline surgical repair are candidates for balloon dilatation therapy.
The long-term success rate for balloon dilatation is not as
high as that for surgical repair (40–55% after balloon
dilatation versus 88% postsurgical revision, at 3 to 5 years
postprocedure).
4,15,16
Method
The first stage of percutaneous balloon dilatation of biliary strictures consists of establishing percutaneous biliary
drainage and crossing the stricture. Usually, at least 2 days
are allowed between initial percutaneous biliary drainage
and the first session of biliary balloon dilatation. The
patient is kept on broad-spectrum antibiotics started before the initial percutaneous biliary drainage. Balloon
size is chosen based on the measured caliber of the adjacent normal duct. The first balloon dilatation usually is
performed using a balloon slightly smaller than the estimated normal duct size, with progressively larger balloon
diameters used on successive days until a balloon of the
established duct size, or perhaps 10 to 20% larger, is used.
Typically, a cycle of biliary balloon dilatation involves
three different sessions with progressively increasing balloon diameters over approximately 1 week’s time. Each
balloon inflation lasts approximately 5 min. After completion of a balloon dilatation session, a 10Fr or 12Fr
internal–external stent catheter is left across the stricture.
In our practice, the stricture is stented for approximately
6 weeks after the final balloon dilatation session. There is
a wide variation in the recommended duration of postprocedure stenting, however, ranging from less than a
month to 12 to 13 months posttreatment.
15–17
After the
stenting period, if follow-up cholangiography shows a
patent duct or anastomosis (Fig. 32-14), the stent is converted to an external catheter, which is left in the bile
ducts upstream of the treated area and capped for one
week to provide a provocative test. If the patient does not
develop symptoms of obstruction (e.g., jaundice, shaking
chills, fever), the external tube is discontinued. If the
cholangiogram shows a persistent stricture, the cycle of
biliary balloon dilatation is repeated.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy
Percutaneous cholecystostomy, or percutaneous catheter
drainage of the gallbladder, is a safe, minimally invasive
interventional procedure that is useful in a number of
clinical situations. The most common indication for percutaneous cholecystostomy is the treatment of acute
cholecystitis in patients who are at high risk for surgical
cholecystectomy for reasons of advanced age, cardiac instability, severe debilitation, or recent trauma. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is often used as a temporary measure
until the patient becomes medically fit to undergo surgery, but it may constitute definitive therapy in patients
who are considered to be permanently high surgical risks.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy can serve as a minimally
invasive diagnostic as well as a therapeutic maneuver. In
the intensive care setting, the diagnosis or exclusion of
acute cholecystitis can be difficult. The classic symptom of
right upper quadrant pain is frequently masked in trauma
victims or otherwise severely ill patients. False-positive
radionuclide gallbladder scintigraphy is common when
there has been prolonged absence of oral intake. Furthermore, such patients may demonstrate sonographic evidence of gallstones or bile sludge, but they may not have
acute cholecystitis, or they may have acute cholecystitis
without gallstones (acalculous cholecystitis). In such confusing circumstances, clinical improvement (e.g., defer vescence, reversal of shock, reduction in white blood count)
within 24 to 48 hrs of percutaneous gallbladder drainage
means that the patient almost certainly had acute cholecystitis. If no clinical improvement occurs after cholecystostomy, the gallbladder can be excluded reliably as the
source of sepsis.
18,19
Other indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy
include providing access for percutaneous removal of
gallstones in patients too unstable to undergo surger y,
performance of diagnostic cholangiography, and as an
alternate route for percutaneous biliary drainage.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy can be performed using
either ultrasound or CT guidance. The advantage of ultrasound guidance is that the cholecystostomy can be
performed at the bedside in patients too sick to leave
their hospital bed for the radiology department, which is
often the circumstance surrounding the referral for percutaneous cholecystostomy. A suitable skin site is chosen
based on the ultrasound or CT evaluation of potential
tracts to the gallbladder. Many practitioners prefer to
make a transhepatic tract to the gallbladder under the
assumption that this lessens the risk of bile leakage into
the peritoneal cavity while the draining catheter is being
placed, because the gallbladder wall is in close apposition
to the liver at this point. Recently, however, the safety and

The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 403
https://t.me/med1917
A
C
feasibility of the direct transperitoneal approach to the
gallbladder have been documented.
20
Thus, it is uncertain whether there is any advantage to a transheptic versus a direct transperitoneal gallbladder puncture. Lidocaine anesthesia is given from the skin along the tract to
the peritoneum. Definitive access can be made by a onestep Trocar approach (drainage catheter mounted on the
puncturing needle) or by the Seldinger method (i.e., the
gallbladder is punctured with a skinny needle, and then
the drainage catheter is advanced into the gallbladder
lumen over a guidewire after suitable coaxial tract dilatation) (Fig. 32-15).
Possible complications of percutaneous cholecystos-
FIGURE 32-14. Proximal common hepatic duct (CHD) postoperative stricture (same patient as in Fig. 32-3) successfully
treated by balloon dilatation. A: Pretreatment, percutaneous
transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC) showing proximal (CHD)
stricture (
initial “waist.” C: Final cholangiogram after 10-mm balloon
dilation and after 6 weeks of stenting with 12Fr catheter, showing elimination of stricture (
white arrow
). B: Balloon inflated across stricture with
black arrow
).
tomy include severe vasovagal reaction, intraperitoneal
hemorrhage, bile peritonitis, and sepsis. Such major complications were reported to occur in 8.7% of patients.
21
If the cholecystostomy catheter is to be discontinued, a
mature tract must be present to decrease the risk of bile
peritonitis. Contrast tract sinography over a guidewire
showing no peritoneal leakage ensures a mature tract.
22
Percutaneous extraction or dissolution of calculi in the
bile ducts or the gallbladder can be performed by percutaneous access as well. Gallstone extraction can be performed using a choledochoscope introduced through
the percutaneous tract,
23
which requires dilating the per-
cutaneous tract up to 19 Fr to allow passage of the chole-
B
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
