Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3860_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
11 Мб
Скачать
☆
394 J. J. Trambert
https://t.me/med1917
A
B
FIGURE 32-4. Cholangiographic appearances of bile duct pathologies. A–C: Nonmalignant diseases. Calculi typically produce
intraluminal rounded filling defects or meniscus-shaped lumen termination (A). Extrinsic inflammatory disease (chronic cholecys- titis, pancreatitis) usually produces a rounded compression of the adjacent bile duct (B). Postoperative fibrotic strictures usually appear as a short, focal stricture or short segmental duct occlusion (C). Malignant diseases (D). Suggestive cholangiographic features include ragged lumen termination (e.g., ampullary carcinoma, polypoid primary bile duct carcinoma), “rat tail”-shaped lumen termination (e.g., encasement by pancreatic carcinoma) and long irregular strictures (e.g., primary bile duct carcinoma, duct encasement by extrinsic tumor).
C
D
ding lesion and revision of the bile duct, which has the potential for long-term cure and is feasible in patients with nonmalignant strictures in such anatomic locations that complete resection of the stricture still allows for tension-free anastomoses. In many medical centers, this category is limited to lesions in the extrahepatic duct (CHD or CBD). Occasionally, malignant strictures can be
curatively resected and bypassed. Sclerosing cholangitis involving only the extrahepatic duct (unusual) is also amenable to surgical bypass. One study noted an 88% five-year sympton-free outcome in patients who under­went surgical correction of benign postoperative stric-
4
tures.
In patients in whom surgery is not a viable option,
percutaneous biliary intervention should be considered.
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 395
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 32-1. Biliary Strictures—Location versus Etiology
Intrahepatic bile duct strictures
Cholangiocarcinoma Encasement by liver metastases or hepatoma Sclerosing cholangitis
Hepatic duct confluence, common hepatic duct
Cholangiocarcinoma Gallbladder carcinoma Metastatic porta hepatis lymphadenopathy Postoperative strictures
Common hepatic duct, Common bile duct
Bile duct carcinoma Pancreatic carcinoma Lymphoma, or other metastatic hepato-duodenal ligament
lymphadenopathy Chronic pancreatitis Postoperative stricture
Distal common bile duct, Ampulla
Pancreatic carcinoma Ampullary carcinoma
Percutaneous biliary interventions include biliary drain­age catheter placement, antegrade placement of internal bile duct stents, bile duct stricture balloon dilatation, percutaneous cholecystostomy, and gallstone extraction.
Percutaneous biliary drainage
Indications
The main indications for percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) are the relief of jaundiceresulting from inoperable obstruction or relief of septic cholangitis. Many patients who present with obstructive jaundice are unfitfor surgery because their disease istoo advanced (i.e., short life expec­tancy), they are poor medical risks for the required major surgery that the biliary reconstruction requires, or the offending lesions are in anatomic positions that are not amenable to durable surgical bypass (e.g., the intrahepatic ducts or hepatic duct confluence.) Such patients are com­mitted to transcatheter prosthesis palliation. Such a pros­thesis can be placed either by retrograde endoscopic ap­proach or by percutaneous transhepatic access. Patients with obstructive jaundice who are surgical candidates but who have septic cholangitis should undergo external biliary drainage to allow resolution of the cholangitis be­fore surgery. The value of preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage in patients who arenot septic is controver­sial because there is no published evidence to suggest that preoperative reduction of the bilirubin level has any bene­ficial effect on subsequent surgical morbidity or mortal-
5,6
ity.
Despite this lack of published proof, many surgeons
believe that preoperative drainage is of some benefit and
➚
➙
➘
FIGURE 32-5. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC) demonstrating smooth extrinsic compression of com­mon hepatic duct (CHD) and common bile duct (CBD) ( secondary to chronic cholecystitis (Mirizzi syndrome).
arrows
FIGURE 32-6. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato­graphy (ERCP) revealing a smoothly tapered common bile duct (CBD) stricture due to chronic pancreatitis (
). Corroborating this diagnosis are the faintly visible ad-
arrow
jacent pancreatic head calcifications (
)
note contrast in the distened irregular pancreatic duct (
white arrows
).
solid white arrow
curved white
). Also
hollow
396 J. J. Trambert
https://t.me/med1917
A B
FIGURE 32-7. Metastatic adenocarcinoma to liver and porta hepatis nodes. A: T-tube cholangiogram showing stricture involving
main hepatic duct (HD) confluence and proximal common hepatic duct (CHD) caused by encasement by porta hepatis lymphadenopathy ( encasement by the liver parenchymal metastases. The resultant multifocal strictures and beadlike appearance of virtually all the opacified ducts shown here are cholangiographically similar to primary sclerosing cholangitis and diffuse cholangiocarcinoma.
continue to refer patients. Furthermore, many surgeons prefer mapping by PTC before bile duct revision, and if this study discloses biliary obstruction, decompression is mandated.
arrow
). B: Retrograde selective right cholangiogram via T-tube tract demonstrating diffuse intrahepatic duct
IV, prior to the procedure, and 1 g every 6 hr for 48 hr in addition to gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg IV, preprocedure fol­lowed by 1.5 mg/kg IV, every 8 hr for 48 hr.
A suitable skin entry site is chosen in the region of the
right mid to anterior axillary line over the right upper
Method
If present, coagulopathies need to be corrected before percutaneous biliary intervention. Preprocedure and periprocedure antibiotics are mandatory to minimize the risk of sepsis from biliary duct manipulation. Antibiotic prophylaxis usually consists of intravenous (IV) cefazolin or cefoxitin 1 g before the procedure and 1 g every 8 hr for 48 hr. A common alternative would be ampicillin 2 g
quadrant of the abdomen. The exact location is guided by fluoroscopic obser vation of the liver and diaphragm, taking care to choose an approach with minimum risk of a transpleural tract. Fluoroscopic observation of a metal marker at the planned entry site while the patient takes a deep breath is usually enough to accomplish this step. The tract, by necessity, is almost always intercostal. Entry should be over the lower rib rather than under the upper
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 397
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 32-9. Percutaneous transhepatic external biliary drainage catheter. Transcatheter cholangiogram shows typical “rat tail” rapid taper common bile duct (CBD) obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma (
arrow
).
FIGURE 32-8. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) demonstrating a cholangiocarcinoma involving the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts and proximal common he­patic duct. Left hepatic ducts are totally obstructed. This type of lesion is sometimes referred to as a
Klatzkin tumor.
rib of the intercostal space to minimize risk of trauma to the intercostal artery and irritation of the intercostal nerve that might render the drainage catheter more painful.
Adequate conscious sedation is needed because percu­taneous biliary manipulation can be quite painful, espe­cially in patients with fibrotic livers resistant to catheter advancement. Lidocaine anesthesia is given along the tract from the skin to the peritoneum. Then a percutane­ous transhepatic cholangiogram is performed by advanc­ing a 21- or 22-gauge needle into the liver. Dilute contrast is infused gently into the needle as it is slowly retracted under fluoroscopic obser vation until the characteristic pattern of bile duct filling is identified. This is manifested
by filling of tubular lumina with contrast that does not wash away (Fig. 32-10A). In attempting to opacify the biliary tree, the needle tip may traverse or lodge in a portal vein, hepatic vein, hepatic artery, or lymphatic. Each of these nonbiliary lumina has a characteristic ori­entation and appearance that differentiate it from a bile duct, and contrast invariably will wash out of the lumen in all of these nonbiliary structures.
Once a biliary radicle is entered, contrast is injected slowly and gently. Care should be exercised to avoid over­distension of the obstructed biliary tree, which could increase the chance of sepsis. A few milliliters of contrast are injected, followed by aspiration of an equal number of milliliters through the same needle to progressively exchange bile for contrast to visualize as much of the biliary tree as possible. Because iodinated water soluble contrast flows into the most dependent locations, tilting the patient semiupright can be helpful in allowing opaci­fication of the central bile ducts with less overall volume of injected contrast. When sufficient anatomy is appar­ent, diagnostic images are obtained. The definitive drain­age procedure is completed by the originally entered duct, if it is suitable in location and vector or by advanc­ing another needle into a more suitable duct under fluo­roscopic guidance (see Fig 32-10B). A rotating C-arm fluoroscopy unit is most helpful for delineating the three­dimensional array of the biliary system in planning de­finitive access. Coaxial micropuncture access systems are used most often to achieve definitive drainage, either by the initial PTC site or by a different duct (see Fig. 32-10).
398 J. J. Trambert
https://t.me/med1917
A
C
External biliary drainage usually is completed by posi­tioning an 8 Fr pigtail catheter proximal to the obstruc­tion and connecting it to a drainage bag. If internal stenting is desired, the stricture or obstruction must be crossed. Crossing the stricture or obstruction is accom­plished by a torque catheter, such as a cobra or Levin shape (Cook) and a soft tip Bentson guidewire (Cook) or hydrophilic glide wire (Terumo) to facilitate atraumatic passage through the blockage to the bowel. If the lesion cannot be crossed easily on the first day, then an external drainage catheter is temporarily left in place upstream of the obstruction, and another attempt to cross the lesion is made a few days later. External bile decompression allows for a decrease in the inflammation and edema, thereby making it easier to cross the obstruction at a later date. Furthermore, external bile decompression will less-
FIGURE 32-10. Procedure for performing percutaneous trans­hepatic biliary drainage in a patient with adenocarcinoma me­tastatic to liver and porta hepatis nodes: sequential steps. A: Thin-needle percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC). The particular duct entered is not suitable for definitive catheterization because of the unfavorable direction of entry, which would direct subsequent wires and catheters peripher­ally. B: After opacification of bile ducts by skinny-needle PTC, more favorably oriented peripheral right hepatic duct tributary then was entered with the skinny needle and 0.018-inch diame­ter wire ( initial duct puncture for PTC ( dilation over 0.018-inch diameter wire, a working catheter was used to cross more distal strictures for internal-external drain­age catheter placement. Intrahepatic duct strictures (
arrows
mon hepatic duct stricture ( nopathy in porta hepatis and hepaticoduodenal ligament.
solid white arrows
) caused by duct encasement by liver metastases. Com-
) advanced centrally. The site of
open arrow
large arrow
). C:. After coaxial
small
) caused by lymphade-
en the risk of procedure-related sepsis if multiple ma­nipulations are needed to cross a lesion. It is rare that an obstruction cannot be traversed on either the first or second attempt.
Complications
Pain control can be difficult, especially when advancing catheters through severely fibrotic livers. This problem is compounded by the presence of a history of chronic alcohol or narcotic abuse with consequent tolerance to analgesic drugs.
Despite prophylactic antibiotics, blood-borne infection
still occurs in 2 to 12% of patients treated.
5,7,8
A pneumo­thorax and a biliary pleural fistula are additional risks, given the proximity of the working area to the diaphragm and pleural space. One or both of these complications
B
FIGURE 32-11. Hepatic artery branch pseudoaneurysm com-
https://t.me/med1917
plicating chronic biliary catheter drainage that was successfully treated by superselective transcatheter embolotherapy.
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 399
ing a leg bag. External drainage is also nonphysiologic; the fluid and electrolytes in the excreted bile are lost and careful fluid replacement may become necessary. For this reason, external biliary drainage is not an acceptable long-term option when it is possible to traverse the ob­struction.
The second arrangement is “internal-external” biliary drainage (see Fig. 32-12). Advantages of this arrange­ment are that bile drains back into the patient eliminat­ing the fluid and electrolyte loss, and the catheter can be exchanged easily over a guidewire. The disadvantages include annoyance to the patient of a prosthesis protrud­ing from the skin, which can affect the patient’s lifestyle and self-image as well as the small but finite risk of intro­ducing an infection.
A third option is placement of an indwelling stent. The advantage of this option is that no catheters protrude from the skin; therefore, patients are not burdened by an externally protruding prosthesis. The disadvantage of to­tally internal stents is that they do obstruct eventually, and then they must be exchanged or revised either tran­sendoscopically or by a new percutaneous transhepatic biliary access procedure.
were noted in approximately 8% of percutaneous biliary drainage procedures.
8
Clinically significant bleeding is encountered in 4 to
15% of percutaneous biliary drainage procedures.
5,9
For­tunately, hepatic artery extravasation or pseudoaneu­rysms complicating PTC and biliar y drainage (Fig. 32-
11) are amenable to percutaneous transcatheter embolotherapy. Ascites increases the risk of complica­tions, particularly that of intraperitoneal hemorrhage. Without ascites, the close apposition of the hepatic cap­sule to the parietal peritoneum provides a tamponade effect. This advantage is lost when the punctured or lac­erated hepatic capsule is surrounded by fluid. In addi­tion, the presence of ascites between the abdominal wall and the liver renders percutaneous biliary drainage or stent placement more difficult. Guidewires and catheters are more likely to buckle and coil in that space when attempts are made to advance them through the liver parenchyma; use of a sheath can be helpful in this situ­ation. These difficulties are often circumvented by per­forming PBD left biliary drainage from the anterior ap­proach (usually because of gravity there is less ascites anterior) or removing some of the ascites by paracentesis prior to biliary drainage. An internal stent can also be placed via a transjugular, transhepatic approach, thereby avoiding the peritoneal cavity.
10
Biliary drainage options
There are three biliary drainage options. The first is external drainage (see Fig. 32-9). The disadvantage of this arrangement is that the patient is committed to wear-
Endoscopic or percutaneous stent placement
Most biliary stents are placed transendoscopically at many institutions, including ours. Percutaneous stent place­ment is preferred in the following situations: (a) in high biliary strictures or obstructions where it is technically more successful than endoscopic stenting or (b) unfavor­able anatomy such as gastric outlet obstruction or pres­ence of a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Percutaneous
FIGURE 32-12. Percutaneous transhepatic internal–external biliary drainage catheter. Patient with encasement of virtually entire common hepatic duct–common bile duct (CHD–CBD) by metastatic breast carcinoma ( catheter sideholes proximal to obstruction are faintly visible
solid black arrows
(
arrow
).
). Catheter pigtail is in duodenum (
open arrows
). Some of the
curved
400
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Trambert
stent placement may often succeed when strictures are refractory to endoscopic retrograde advancement of the stent.
Plastic stents
Probably the most common plastic stent that has been in use by interventional radiologists is the Carey Coons stent (Medi-Tech Inc.), a straight plastic tube with side holes along itslength and a nylon string attached to its proximal end that can be used to retract the stent if it is initially advanced too far. The string then is connected to a Silastic button, which is embedded in subcutaneous tissue via a small 1.5-cm incision. The nylon string thus prevents stent dislodgement and migration. It is sometimes possible to regain entry into the bile duct containing the proximal end of the stent by reexposing the silastic button, mobiliz­ing the nylon string, tying a suture to the string, and then advancing a small catheter over this suture-nylon string guidewire into the bile duct, allowing a possible stent ex-
11
change or replacement.
Stent exchange can be accom­plished by engaging the old occluded stent coaxially with an angioplasty balloon, pushing it into the duodenum or jejunum, and placing a new stent over the guidewire. The old stent almost invariably passes through the bowel by peristalsis and out with the stool.
Internal plastic stents have an average life expectancy
12
of 3 to 4 months.
Frequently, patients treated with stents for malignant obstructions die before their stents oc­clude. Sometimes, however, patients can survive for 1 or 2 years following the palliative stent bypass. This is par­ticularly true of slow growing, indolent malignancies such as some cholangiocarcinomas or rarely in the case of slow growing pancreatic carcinomas.
A patient with nonmalignant strictures may require stenting, perhaps because the stricture has failed more than one attempt at operative repair, has an anatomically unfavorable location for operative repair (such as intra­hepatic strictures or multiple strictures), or has failed bal­loon dilatation treatment. Patients with refractory non­malignant strictures may have a normal lifespan if their bile flow and hepatic integrity are maintained either by stenting or in selected situations by liver transplantation. Such patients will outlive their stents, therefore, long­term stent maintenance and possible replacement must be considered at the time of stent placement.
When internal–external stenting is used, the stent may be exchanged easily over a guidewire, a simple outpatient procedure, usually done prophylactically every 3 months, treating the patient with one dose of antibiotics (like those administered for percutaneous biliary drainage) be­fore the exchange. Unfortunately, an exchange is more complicated for patients who have internal stents. Ex­change of internal stents, if not possible endoscopically, requires a new percutaneous transhepatic bile duct ac-
cess, with its associated discomfort and potential compli­cations.
One of the major disadvantages of placing large plastic stents from the percutaneous approach is the need for a transhepatic tract at minimum the size of the stent caliber (usually 12–14Fr). Thus, the risks of bleeding and pain from stent advancement, particularly through afibrotic or cirrhotic liver, are increased. In the past, this problem was ameliorated by the combined percutaneous–endoscopic team approach to stent placement. Because lower profile metallic stent for malignant etiologies have replaced plas­tic stents in many institutions, this potential problem is encountered much less frequently.
Percutaneous transhepatic stent placement
The per­cutaneous placement of an internal biliary stent involves the advancement of the stent transhepatically over a guidewire and carefully positioning it across the obstruc­tion.
Plastic stents are advanced over the guidewire using a “pusher catheter,” which is retracted after the stent is in position. Expandable metal stents are positioned on their delivery device and then deployed either by retraction of a containment membrane or sheath (Wallstent and Gian­turco-Rosch Z-stent, respectively) or by balloonexpansion (Palmaz stent). Expandable metal stents are discussed in greater detail later. When the internal stent is in position, an external catheter usually is temporarily positioned up­stream of the stent. The external catheter is removed when adequate internal stent function has been con­firmed clinically and cholangiographically and external drainage or transhepatic access is no longer needed.
Percutaneous–endoscopic team approach
The com­bined antegrade–retrograde team approach involves creation of a catheter tract from the skin through the biliary obstruction to the bowel. A transhepatic entry into the biliary tree is made, and the interventional radiologist advances a guidewire across the obstruction and out into the bowel; the wire is then grasped by the endoscopist and retracted out through the oral cavity. Retrograde trans­oral stent placement is then made possible because the guidewire can be held taut at both ends.
When the stent is safely in position, the guidewire is removed, which allows the advancement of a 12 Fr stent while only needing a 4 or 5 Fr tract in the skin and liver parenchyma, resulting in a significant decrease in pain and morbidity.
13
Expandable metal stents
The advantage of the expandable metal stent is that it can be introduced through a small transhepatic tract, and it then expands, either by inherent spring tension or bal­loon dilatation to a much larger caliber than the in­troducer itself. The stents available in the United States
that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration
https://t.me/med1917
(FDA) for use in the biliary system include the Wallstent (Schneider Incorporated), the Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent (Cook Incorporated), and the Palmaz stent (Johnson and Johnson). The Wallstent and Gianturco-Rosch Z­stent are self-expanding (Fig. 32-13). The Palmaz stent requires balloon expansion. In Europe, the Strecker stent is also available, but this stent is not yet approved for use in the United States.
The most popular stents for use in the bile ducts are the Wallstent and the Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent. At my institu­tion, the Wallstent is used most frequently. The Wallstent introducer is only 7 Fr, and some interventionalists place them without using a sheath (7 Fr ID, 8.5 Fr OD). This means the maximumsize transhepatic tract needed is only 7-8.5Fr compared to the 12–14 Fr tract needed to place a Carey-Coons type plastic stent. Unlike the plastic stents with lumina of only 4 mm or smaller, the Wallstent and Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent can expand to 10 mm or larger.
It would seem that a 10 mm diameter lumen would remain patent longer than a 4 mm plastic stent lumen. Initially, this impression was not corroborated by experi­ence; however, one recent double-blind trial comparing plastic stents and Wallstents shows an approximately two­fold patency duration advantage for Wallstents compared with plastic stents1.
14
This, in addition to the decreased pain and morbidity involved in the transhepatic place­ment of expandable metal stents, offsets the disadvantage of their relatively high price (the cost of a single metal stent is approximately 20 times higher than that of a plastic stent).
Self-expanding metal stents, despite their larger maxi­mum lumen, do occlude. Occlusion occurs either by tu­mor overgrowth at the ends of the stent, bile inspissation, or, less commonly, tumor ingrowth through the wire mesh of the stent. Tumor overgrowth at stent ends can be fore­stalled by careful positioning of the stent and by selection of a stent at least 1 cm longer than the stricture at either end. Not much can be done to prevent bile sludge inspis­sation occlusion, and patients differ in their propensity for this problem. Some interventional radiologists believe that the Gianturco-Rosch Z-stent is more susceptible to tumor ingrowth through the stent interstices than the Wallstent, which possesses a much tighter wire mesh. Cov­ered stents may have the potential to decrease or elimi­nate the problem of occlusion caused by tumor ingrowth, but they are currently under investigation.
Unlike plastic stents that can be removed and ex­changed transendoscopically or percutaneously, expand­able metal stents are permanent implants. As such, revi­sion of occluded stents consists of balloon dilation of the stent lumen, flushing out inspissated bile, removing tu­mor ingrowth by atherectomy, or deploying a second stent coaxially within the original stent. This second stent can be an internal metallic or plastic stent. Many inter-
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas
FIGURE 32-13. Self-expanding Wallstent deployed across a
malignant common bile duct (CBD) obstruction. A: Immedi­ately after deployment, a stent lumen within a tumor of approxi­mately only 2 mm diameter ( after deployment, the stent within the tumor has self-dilated to approximately 7 mm diameter (
black arrowheads
black arrowheads
). B: Te n d a y s
).
401
A
B
402
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Trambert
ventional radiologists prefer to place internal-external plastic stents through the occluded metal stent from a transhepatic approach. Tumor overgrowth at the end of a stent can be treated by deploying a second stent partly overlapping the first stent.
Because metal stents are permanent implants, there is general reluctance to use them to treat nonmalignant biliary strictures, but metal stents have replaced plastic ones for treatment of malignant disease in an increasing number of inter ventional radiologists’ practices.
Percutaneous balloon dilation of nonmalignant biliary strictures
Most nonmalignant strictures are amenable to surgical repair with good long-term results. Patients whose stric­tures recur after previous operative repair or are not in a favorable anatomic position for surgical repair (e.g., in­trahepatic duct strictures) or patients who decline surgi­cal repair are candidates for balloon dilatation therapy. The long-term success rate for balloon dilatation is not as high as that for surgical repair (40–55% after balloon dilatation versus 88% postsurgical revision, at 3 to 5 years postprocedure).
4,15,16
Method
The first stage of percutaneous balloon dilatation of bili­ary strictures consists of establishing percutaneous biliary drainage and crossing the stricture. Usually, at least 2 days are allowed between initial percutaneous biliary drainage and the first session of biliary balloon dilatation. The patient is kept on broad-spectrum antibiotics started be­fore the initial percutaneous biliary drainage. Balloon size is chosen based on the measured caliber of the adja­cent normal duct. The first balloon dilatation usually is performed using a balloon slightly smaller than the esti­mated normal duct size, with progressively larger balloon diameters used on successive days until a balloon of the established duct size, or perhaps 10 to 20% larger, is used. Typically, a cycle of biliary balloon dilatation involves three different sessions with progressively increasing bal­loon diameters over approximately 1 week’s time. Each balloon inflation lasts approximately 5 min. After com­pletion of a balloon dilatation session, a 10Fr or 12Fr internal–external stent catheter is left across the stricture. In our practice, the stricture is stented for approximately 6 weeks after the final balloon dilatation session. There is a wide variation in the recommended duration of post­procedure stenting, however, ranging from less than a month to 12 to 13 months posttreatment.
15–17
After the stenting period, if follow-up cholangiography shows a patent duct or anastomosis (Fig. 32-14), the stent is con­verted to an external catheter, which is left in the bile ducts upstream of the treated area and capped for one week to provide a provocative test. If the patient does not develop symptoms of obstruction (e.g., jaundice, shaking
chills, fever), the external tube is discontinued. If the cholangiogram shows a persistent stricture, the cycle of biliary balloon dilatation is repeated.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy
Percutaneous cholecystostomy, or percutaneous catheter drainage of the gallbladder, is a safe, minimally invasive interventional procedure that is useful in a number of clinical situations. The most common indication for per­cutaneous cholecystostomy is the treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients who are at high risk for surgical cholecystectomy for reasons of advanced age, cardiac in­stability, severe debilitation, or recent trauma. Percutane­ous cholecystostomy is often used as a temporary measure until the patient becomes medically fit to undergo sur­gery, but it may constitute definitive therapy in patients who are considered to be permanently high surgical risks.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy can serve as a minimally invasive diagnostic as well as a therapeutic maneuver. In the intensive care setting, the diagnosis or exclusion of acute cholecystitis can be difficult. The classic symptom of right upper quadrant pain is frequently masked in trauma victims or otherwise severely ill patients. False-positive radionuclide gallbladder scintigraphy is common when there has been prolonged absence of oral intake. Further­more, such patients may demonstrate sonographic evi­dence of gallstones or bile sludge, but they may not have acute cholecystitis, or they may have acute cholecystitis without gallstones (acalculous cholecystitis). In such confus­ing circumstances, clinical improvement (e.g., defer ves­cence, reversal of shock, reduction in white blood count) within 24 to 48 hrs of percutaneous gallbladder drainage means that the patient almost certainly had acute chole­cystitis. If no clinical improvement occurs after cholecys­tostomy, the gallbladder can be excluded reliably as the source of sepsis.
18,19
Other indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy include providing access for percutaneous removal of gallstones in patients too unstable to undergo surger y, performance of diagnostic cholangiography, and as an alternate route for percutaneous biliary drainage.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy can be performed using either ultrasound or CT guidance. The advantage of ul­trasound guidance is that the cholecystostomy can be performed at the bedside in patients too sick to leave their hospital bed for the radiology department, which is often the circumstance surrounding the referral for per­cutaneous cholecystostomy. A suitable skin site is chosen based on the ultrasound or CT evaluation of potential tracts to the gallbladder. Many practitioners prefer to make a transhepatic tract to the gallbladder under the assumption that this lessens the risk of bile leakage into the peritoneal cavity while the draining catheter is being placed, because the gallbladder wall is in close apposition to the liver at this point. Recently, however, the safety and
The Biliary Tree and Pancreas 403
https://t.me/med1917
A
C
feasibility of the direct transperitoneal approach to the gallbladder have been documented.
20
Thus, it is uncer­tain whether there is any advantage to a transheptic ver­sus a direct transperitoneal gallbladder puncture. Lido­caine anesthesia is given from the skin along the tract to the peritoneum. Definitive access can be made by a one­step Trocar approach (drainage catheter mounted on the puncturing needle) or by the Seldinger method (i.e., the gallbladder is punctured with a skinny needle, and then the drainage catheter is advanced into the gallbladder lumen over a guidewire after suitable coaxial tract dilata­tion) (Fig. 32-15).
Possible complications of percutaneous cholecystos-
FIGURE 32-14. Proximal common hepatic duct (CHD) post­operative stricture (same patient as in Fig. 32-3) successfully treated by balloon dilatation. A: Pretreatment, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTC) showing proximal (CHD) stricture ( initial “waist.” C: Final cholangiogram after 10-mm balloon dilation and after 6 weeks of stenting with 12Fr catheter, show­ing elimination of stricture (
white arrow
). B: Balloon inflated across stricture with
black arrow
).
tomy include severe vasovagal reaction, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, bile peritonitis, and sepsis. Such major com­plications were reported to occur in 8.7% of patients.
21
If the cholecystostomy catheter is to be discontinued, a mature tract must be present to decrease the risk of bile peritonitis. Contrast tract sinography over a guidewire showing no peritoneal leakage ensures a mature tract.
22
Percutaneous extraction or dissolution of calculi in the bile ducts or the gallbladder can be performed by percu­taneous access as well. Gallstone extraction can be per­formed using a choledochoscope introduced through the percutaneous tract,
23
which requires dilating the per-
cutaneous tract up to 19 Fr to allow passage of the chole-
B