Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5932_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
13 Мб
Скачать
☆
66 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
FIGURE 3.2 Schematic Representation for the Synthesis of Graphene by (a) Liquid-Phase
Exfoliation (LPE) and (b) A Typical Experimental Setup of the Electrochemical Exfoliation Process for the Synthesis of Graphene [31].
and the electrochemical exfoliation of graphite was tested at 10V for 10 min.This technique successfully fabricated graphene nanosheetswith one to three layers and a yield of roughly 60% [37]. According to the ndings of the aforementioned studies, sulfuric acid is considered acompetent electrolyte for the electrochemical deposition of graphene and exfoliation of graphite. The electrolyte process may be encouraged by the sulfate ions’ size of 0.46 nm, which is comparable to the graphite interlayer spac­ing of 0.335 nm. Additionally, gases like SO2, O2, and H2 are released during the elec­trolysis of sulfate ions and co-intercalated water [38]. Graphite wasaked throughout the complexation process due to the use of an acid electrolyte. However, in contrast to what was anticipated, this technique produces multiple layers of graphene. Further­more, Parvez etal. (2014) suggested a detailed mechanism for the electrochemical exfoliation of graphite in an ammonium sulfate solution, as presented in Figure3.3. In this process, the voltage output was adjusted to 10V, and graphite electrodes were submerged in an electrolyte solution. During the electrolysis, water reduction at the cathode results in the formation of hydroxyl (OH-) ions, which are effective nucleo­philes. The corners and borders of the graphite grains are attacked by nucleophiles, which furtherpromotes theoxidation processes and the physical adsorption of sulfate ions in the graphite layer. The expansion and depolarization of the graphite layer are driven by oxidation reactions. Throughout this reaction, water molecules co- intercalate with SO
2-
ions. Gas molecules, namely, SO2 and O2, wereproduced as a result of SO
4
2-
4
ion reduction and oxidation ofwater molecules. The energy available to gas species allows them to detach the graphite layer and develop multilayer graphene. The process of exfoliating graphite is also inuenced by the concentration of electrolytesat the applied voltage. To obtain 5 wt.% graphenes, the minimum electrolyte concentration for the graphite electrolysis reaction was < 0.01M. It was suggested that the yield of graphene-containing products might improveover 75 wt.%provided the concentration was raised to a 0.01 to 1.0M limit. The overall mechanism of graphite exfoliation by electrochemistry in inorganic salts is supported by this event [37,39].
Similarly, the hybrid method comprising sonication and an electrochemical oxi­dation process was also employed for the synthesis of graphene. Such combined
67Graphene-Based Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery System
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
FIGURE 3.3 Proposed Mechanism for the Electrochemical Exfoliation of Graphite in an Ammonium Sulfate Solution. [Reprinted with permission from Parvez et al. (2014)] [39].
techniques can mitigate the requirement for rigorous operation stages, elevatedtem­peratures, and excessive pressures in the synthesis method [31].
3.2.3 laser aBlaTion
A novel technique for synthesizing nanomaterials, particularly graphene, is laser ablation. This approach offers a number of potential benets, such as environmental friendliness, simple experimental modes, long-term stability of nanoparticles, the absence of toxic synthesis reagents, and undesirable contaminants in nanoparticle compositions [40,41]. Cappelli etal. (2015)produced graphene using laser ablation. Their study was carried out utilizing a near-IR Nd: YAG laser (λ = 523 nm, fre­quency= 10 Hz, pulse width (τ)=7 ns, anddeposition period=15 min) on silicon (Si) wafers with variablesurface temperatures (from ambient temperature to 900 °C) [42]. The development process is then carried out under a range of congurations to produce high-quality graphene [43].
Solid carbon sourceis essential inlaser ablation methodologies toenable the laser source for carbon eradication and synthesize graphene [44,45]. Throughout the fabri­cation of graphene, a number of laser parameters need to be regulated [46]. The qual­ity of the nal product may change depending on the way these parameters areset up for the laser ablation device. The laser’s physical characteristics, such as its uence, wavelength, frequency (repetition rate), and pulse duration, should be regulated as the initial parameter. The next controllable variables arethe substrate’s tempera­ture, distance, ambient pressure, and gas conditions. The product is also inuenced by substrate choice. In a study employing the laser ablation technique, Koh etal. (2012) examined the viability of different metals as a substrate for the production of graphene. Nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu),and iron (Fe)were the metals that were examined. According to the ndings, graphene made from Ni, Co, Cu,and Fe
68 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
frameworks does have a lattice constant of 0.357, 0.361, 0.352,0.251, and 0.287 nm, correspondingly [45].
A high-grade bilayer graphene was produced utilizing a Ni/SiO2 substrate by Hemani etal. (2013). This information was supported by Raman spectroscopy, which demonstrated ndings that were 60% better than those obtained with other substrates [44]. Pechlivani etal. (2017) evaluatedthe impact of pulses on diverse substrates. To achieve the required wavelengths and pulse energies, ultra-short pulse lasers were deployed. The outcomes of this investigation demonstrated that the development of ultra-short pulse laser technology has the potential to promote micro-graphene as an effective material in the manufacturing industry [47]. De Bonis etal. (2015)also used ultra-short laser ablation, which resulted in exceptional graphene production [48]. Figure3.4 describes the general congurations of the laser ablation-based technique for the synthesis of graphene, wherein direct laser contact with the carbon/graphite solid causes it to lose some of its frameworks andyielding graphene [31].
3.2.4 chemical Vapor DeposiTion (cVD)
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is one of thebottom-up synthesis processes uti­lized on a larger scale to synthesize high-gradegraphene [49]. In this procedure, a surface substrate and gas moleculesare combined inside a reactor vessel while the reaction environment is controlled throughtemperature, gas ow rate, and pressure [50]. Aconventional CVD instrument consists of a quartz reactor, a mass ow con­troller,thermocouples for temperature monitoring, a pump, gas distribution lines, a power system, a vacuum system,and a computer for auto-control. For the CVD process that produces graphene lms, a variety of substrates are employed, including nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), andcopper (Cu). Typically, carbon sources include hydrocar­bon gases likemethane (CH4) and acetylene (C2H2). The carbon source is stimulated using two CVD techniques: thermal CVD and plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD) [51].
To synthesize graphene, thermal CVD employs a vacuum tube, furnace, pressure gauges, vacuum pump,and mass ow regulator to regulate the amount of hydrocarbon
FIGURE 3.4 A General Conguration of the Laser Ablation-Based Technique for the Synthe­sis of Graphene [31].
69Graphene-Based Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery System
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
and career gas. In PECVD, plasma prompts the gas source to break down before reacting with the metal substrate to trigger the development of graphene laments [52]. Plasma has been developed using many power sources, including radio frequency (RF), microwave, and direct current (DC) [53]. The ability of graphene growth methodology to proceed at low pressure and temperatures is a majorbenet of PECVD over thermal CVD [54]. High temperature causes the decomposition of carbon sources into carbon and hydrogen atoms.
In this CVD technique, the undesirable compounds on the metallic surface of the catalyst are eliminated and cleaned using H2and Argas as carrier gases. Graphene has traditionally been grown via CVD on transitional metallic substrates like Cu and Ni [55]. There are two primary phases in this growing process: 1. thermal decompo­sition of the gas reactant to produce carbon, and 2. exploitation of segmented carbon on the surface of the metallic catalyst to produce the carbon framework of graphene [56]. One method is to rst anneal nickel in an H2 environment at the required tem­perature of 900–1000 °C with grain size in order to produce graphene using poly­crystalline nickel [5]. In this case, CH4 is employed as the carbon source, and the substrate is subject to a combination of H2 and CH4. The carbon atom dissolves in the Ni substrateduring the hydrocarbon’s breakdown andyields the solid solution. Because Ni has the ability to dissolve at high temperatures, it may be solidied and condensed in argon gas to yield a precipitate of Ni-C that can scratch graphene (Figure 3.5) [5]. Ni is an excellent substrate toward the synthesis of graphene;
FIGURE 3.5 Growth Mechanism of Graphene on Cu/Ni Substrate Through Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)(a) Graphene Growth by Dissolution-Precipitation Mechanism and (b) Graphene Growth Direct by Deposition Mechanism. [Adapted with permission from Mbayachi et al. (2021)] [5].
70 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
however, the dimension and proportion of monolayer graphene might vary depending on the purity of the Ni lm. The thickness and purity of graphene are inuenced by the cooling rate, and the structure of Ni may also have an impact on the morphology of obtained graphene[57].
To determine the relative signicance and relevance of the factors, Papon etal. (2017)used a technique called “designs of experiments.” The interplay of a num­ber of independent variables in the fabrication of graphene on a Cu substrate was explained by this design. The outcome demonstrated a considerable effect of sub­strate temperature, duration, heating rate, and pre-annealing time on the nal purity of the graphene produced. The time frame of the graphene development process and the rates at which the temperature of the source of carbon is rising are the two major factors that specically inuence the size of the graphene outcome [58]. It signies that the researchers onlyneed to tweak these elements to affect the size substantially. Additionally, Liu and Liu (2017) highlighted that strong control over the reaction conditions could result in the production of large-area, high-grade graphene with distinct structures and layers [59].
In general, the CVD technique continues to be one of the most effective ways to produce signicant amounts of graphene. Comparing the CVD process to other techniques like Scotch tape, thermal breakdown, reduction of GO, LPE, and even otherbottom-up methods, the graphene obtained approximately 1.5 times better.
3.2.5 pyrolysis
The Greek pyro and lysis elements are where the word “pyrolysis” rst appeared. Pyro denotes re, and lysis indicatesseparation. Few-layer graphene can besynthe­sized via a simplistic process of pyrolysisthat involves synthesizing carbon atoms on a metal surface [60]. The thermal breakdown of silicon carbide (SiC)is one of the frequently used methods of producing graphene.Si desorbs at elevatedtemperatures, keeping C remaining to produce a few graphene layers. This method has signicantly improved as a result of the ongoing mm-scale synthesisof graphene lms at a tem­perature of 750 °C on a thin nickel lm deposited on aSiC substrate [61]. The benet of this technique is that graphene sheets are continuously produced all across the whole SiC-coated surface. Unfortunately, large-scale production of graphene could notbe possible using this process. At 1000 k, a similar system is used in the thermal breakdown of ethylene. The ability to synthesize high-gradegraphene monolayers is a benet of this synthesis technique [62].
3.2.6 arc Discharge
The arc discharge is indeed a comparatively economical and ecologically responsi­ble technique for manufacturing graphene [63,64]. The arc discharge process may synthesize graphene in the presence ofH2, He, or N2 [65]. To fabricate few-layered graphene underneath a combination of He and carbon dioxide (CO (2010) designed the arc discharge technique [66]. The outcome demonstrates that the acquired graphene has fewer aws than graphene made using chemical processes. For further applicability, the produced graphene may also be readily dispersed in organic
), Wu etal.
2
71Graphene-Based Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery System
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
solvents. Excellent graphene for constructing electrodes with different devices may be produced under suitable He and CO2 environments within the arc discharge tech­nique. The graphene made by this process also has the benet of being an excellent option for an electrical charger utilized for conducting composites. Arepeatable and sustainable aqueous arc discharge technique that yields excellent-grade dual and triple-layer graphene was described by Kim etal. (2016) [67]. Meanwhile,it is nec­essary to design a purication technique since they discovered contaminants while utilizing this approach.
Cheng etal. (2017)executed a studyon the exploration of the arc discharge tech­nique to make graphene throughcombining a vacuum arc discharge with the CVD process. Graphene is fabricated on a copper foil with the aid of a furnace operating at an elevatedtemperature and a vacuum arc discharge. This fusion technique may form a single sheet of graphene at high temperatures [68]. To fabricate graphene nanosheets on a mass scale, Wu etal. (2016) revealed the mechanics of the arc dis­charge approach. In their study, an activated carbon (AC)was employed as the anode and the cathode in the arc discharge process beneath themixed gases (H2 and N2). Due to the concurrent reaction and evaporation caused by the alternating current used throughout the process, sediments at the cathode are not formed. By doing this, the temperature is raised, which is necessary to speed up the dispersion of carbon atoms and clusters. As the diffusing rate increases, both thecarbon atoms and gas molecules might interact with one another. Because H2gas hasan extremely rapid cooling rate, graphene products may be easily developed. To achieve these circum­stances and produce graphene with acceptable quality, they have blended H2gas with an inert gas like N2, which possessesa lower thermal conductivity [69].
3.3 FUNCTIONALIZATION OF GRAPHENE
Despite the enormous potential for applications, it is imperative to perceive that the graphene itself is hydrophobic and exhibits zero band gap, instability in aqueous conditions, and inertness to reactions, which weaken its potential to compete in the biomedical industry. This is among the factors contributing to the enormous rise in research initiatives focused on the functionalization of graphene, encompassing interactions between graphene (and its derivatives) and inorganic and organic mol­ecules, chemical alteration of the large graphene surface, as well as a comprehen­sive description of numerous covalent and non-covalent interactions with graphene [3,70,71]. Functionalization with oxygenated functional groups through the formation of GO has multiplied the adaptability of graphene in drug delivery, cancer therapeu­tics, and other biomedical applications. Furthermore, the widening of the graphene band gap induced by doping andintercalationmight aid in the development ofeffec­tive nanoelectronics components. The graphene-based nanomaterials potentially pro­vide a gateway to new domains of biotechnology unless they were biofunctionalized with certainbiomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids,enzymes, andpeptides [72]. In addition, due to its aptitude to quench a variety of chemical dyes, quantum dots (QDs), and rapid DNA sequencing, graphene has recently been recognized as a via­ble element in the design of uorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosen­sors [73]. Graphene can be functionalized via covalent and non-covalent interactions
72 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
through numerous value-added functional entities, which further improves the sur­face characteristics of graphene; the details are provided subsequently.
3.3.1 coValenT FUncTionaliZaTion
The covalent functionalization of graphene has been the subject of several studies, with the primary goals being to offer graphene with improved aqueous solubility, ease of processing, reduced toxicity, and biocompatibility [3,12]. After molecules are bonded covalently to graphene, the sp2 carbon atoms of the π-network undergo rehybridization into an sp3 orientation. This results in a partial or complete break­down of the π–πconjugation and impairments to the inherent chemical and physical characteristics of graphene.
Graphene may be functionalized either at the basal surface or at the edges, albeit it demands a variable amount of energy. As a result of their rehybridization to the sp3 tetrahedral conguration, the dangling terminal bonds actually respond with reduced energy barriers since it does not put excessive strain on the innermost carbon elements. The covalent functionalization of graphene can occur in either two ways:
1. throughthe development of covalent cross-linking between reactive species like dienophiles and free radicals and the C=C bonds of pure graphene; or 2. through the development of covalent links between organic functionalities and the oxygen groups of GO. The latter approach is most frequently used to attach solubilizing and biologically active compounds to graphene. In fact, GO is a preferable contender for biomedical application than pure graphene due to its oxygen-rich functional groups, such as the carboxyl,epoxy, and hydroxylgroups, which offer improved dispersibility, biocompatibility, and the potential for theirsubsequent surface modication [12,74].
Previously, numerous covalent functionalization strategies were adopted for the surface modication of graphene through organic compounds. The functionaliza­tion of graphene with organic compounds has signicantly improved its dispersibil­ity and, ultimately, colloidal stability as well as biocompatibility. The cycloaddition reaction, free radical addition, and nucleophilic addition reactions drove organic group functionalization.
3.3.1.1 Cycloaddition
The cycloaddition can be distinctively carried away through zwitterionic intermedi­ate, the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azomethine ylide, Diels–Alder cycloaddition, and other organic intermediates such as nitrene, carbene, and aryne. The combination of 4-dimethylamino pyridine with an acetylene dicarboxylate produces a zwitterionic intermediate, which reacts with an acetylene dicarboxylate to yield a ve-membered ring. According tothe substituted functional groups, the functionalized nanoparti­cles of graphenecan be dispersed in organic solvents like DMF, CHCl3, or water [75].
Nitrenes are active compounds formed only after the photochemical or ther­mal ablation of an N2 molecule from the organic azides. They effortlessly com­bine with the graphene C=C double bonds to establish three-membered aziridine rings that link the organic azide component to the surface ofgraphene nanosheets. Graphene nanosheets are ultimately adorned with aromatic compounds [76], polymers [77], or aliphatic chains that may then be supplemented with functional
73Graphene-Based Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery System
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
groups like carboxyl or hydroxyl groups depending upon the organic compo­nent [74,78]. These functional units may help to post-functionalize the obtained graphene. For instance, carboxyl groups preferentially absorb gold nanoparticles (NPs)distributed in a solution of carboxy-alkyl aziridine functionalized graphene, enabling the gold NPstobe immobilized on the functionalized graphene. Graphene that has undergone chemical modication is simple to dissolve in organic solvents. Asignicant expansion in the sp3/sp2 ratio of graphene’s carbon atoms occurs con­currently with the development of aziridine rings, and this increase is seen as a rise in the ID/IG ratioof functionalized graphene. When graphene combines with a sur­plus of the alkyl azides by a factor of 10,the ID/IG ratio is demonstrated to enhance even more. This nding demonstrates a clear correlation across the reagent ratio and the extent of graphene’s surface modication. In other terms, the proportion of the reagents might inuence the extent of graphene functionalization [78]. Nitrene addition might potentially be employed in polymer grafting on graphene nanosheets [76]. Numerous azide groups must be present in the polymeric chains of these poly­mers. By adding nitrene, it is possible to covalently attach polyacetylene containing alkyne azide groups on its side chain onto a surface ofgraphene. Because of the chemical afnities of the obtained polymeric matrix, the functionalized polyacet­ylene exhibit improved dispersibility in conventional organic solvents. Previously, asimilar method was employed to functionalize graphene with phenylalanine. The reaction occurs once N-protected azido phenylalanine is combined with exfoliating graphene nanosheets distributed in o- dichlorobenzene (Figure3.6) [74,79].
FIGURE 3.6 Formation of a Polyacetylene/Graphene Composite through an Aziridine Ring Linker. [Reproduced with permission from V. Georgakilas (2014)] [74].
74 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
Similar to nitrene, carbenes are extremely reactive organic precursors with low electron density, which can target C-H bonds with sp3 carbon atoms in place of hydrogen or C=C bonds in a [1 + 2] cycloaddition process. Due to the abundance of C=C and C-H bonds at the edges and defective sites of graphene, the interactions of graphene with carbenes results in the surface modication of graphene via both possible mechanisms. Despite sufcient information from the early functionalization of CNTs,and fullerenes employing carbene derivatives, the interaction ofgraphene and carbene is still not fully utilized [74]. In the [1 + 2] reactions, dichlorocarbene synthesized from chloroform that has been treated with sodium hydroxide (NaOH)is introduced to graphene nanoplatelets to formulate three-memberedrings [3,74].
Ismaili et al. (2011) demonstrated the encapsulation of gold NPs on the sur­face ofgraphene through organic linkers, which resulted in a muchmore complex graphene functionalization via carbene [80]. Carbene was synthesized by photo­chemically treating a 3-aryl-3(triuoromethyl)-diazirine derivative that had gold NPs coupled at the side of the molecule by an Au-S interaction. Carbenes were also formed through the breakdown of diazirines and the separation of nitrogen atoms as N2, which may be accomplished via heating or incinerating diazirine com­pounds. The benet of not offering potential intramolecular recombination routes for the associated carbenes, which results in by-products andlowers the productivity of a carbene addition process, makes 3-Aryl-3(triuoromethyl)-diazirine compounds a common choice for carbene synthesis. In this case, gold NPsencapsulated with alkane thiol chains were partially functionalized by 3-aryl-3-(triuoromethyl)-di­azirine molecules via a thiol-alkyloxy linker in which thiol is linked to gold and oxygen onto the aryl ring [3].
As previously mentioned, arynes are another group of very reactive organic intermediates that are synthesized from phenyl derivatives by removing two ortho heteroatoms. As a result of their reactivity, arynes may easily undergo [2 + 2] or [4 + 2] cycloadditions with dienes or C=C bonds. Zhong et al. (2010) employed 2-(trimethylsilyl) aryl triate as a precursorfor the synthesis of the aryne interme­diate under the novel framework in which graphene nanosheets were functiona­lized by aryne cycloaddition. The dissolution rate of the functionalized graphene was signicantly improved in an organic and polar solvent like DMF, o-DCB (1,2-dichlorobenzene), ethanol, chloroform, and water whilesucceeding the interac­tion of the modied arene to graphene by a four-membered ring. Similarly, various distinct functional groups cansupersede thearenes [81].
3.3.1.2 Free radical addition
Free radicals are extremely reactive organic mediators that engage sp2 carbon atoms and establish covalent bonds. They are often synthesized from organic compounds by meticulously removing an easily leaving component that dissociates a covalent bonding. Acommon method for producing free radicals is to heat the diazonium salt of an organic molecule. Meanwhile, the radicals are formed by eliminating an N2 molecule. The hybridization of the reacting carbon atoms shifts from sp2 to sp3 when an organic radical is introduced to the surface ofgraphene. Such alteration disrupts the aromatic structure, resulting in a signicant impact on the electrical character­istics of graphene [74]. According to Tour et al. (2010),the graphene conductivity
75Graphene-Based Nanocarriers as Drug Delivery System
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
decreases as a consequence of the time of the radical addition reaction, which maybe regulated effectively [82].
In contrast, functionalizing graphene results in the introduction of a band gap that can be specied, enabling graphene withremarkable semiconducting characteristics [83]. This process has also been used to place aryl diazonium salts on graphene surfaces, demonstrating itssignicantadaptability. These functional groups include carboxy, chlorine, bromine, nitro,iodine,and cyano. Herein, the thermallyor chem­ically reduced graphene that has been made into nanostructures is the primary component. Asurfactant is then employed to make the reduced graphene disperse. The functionalized graphene compounds could be dissolved in polar aprotic solvents [84]. Numerous types of graphene, including epitaxial graphene [85] and graphene obtained through mechanical cleavage [86], have indeed been subjected to diazo­nium salt interactions.
To examine the antibacterial properties of the synthesized graphene compound, chlorophenyl groups have also been introduced to graphene nanosheetsby the dia­zonium salt reactions. The extensive bactericidal potential of chlorine is a signi­cantcharacteristic of chlorophenyl-functionalized graphene [86]. Sun etal. (2010) attempted to effectively functionalize theedges of graphene nanosheetswhile keep­ing the graphitic surface unaltered and furtheremployed the diazonium salt reaction to accomplish this goal. It wasnot feasible to regulate the addition of free radicals to the reacting graphene region upon full exfoliation of the monolayers since the edges, and the remained surfaceare both equallyexposed to the radical species. This is not the case for expanded graphite, in which the edges are fully exposed, whereas the major graphene surface is shielded against large 4-bromophenyl radicals with a rela­tively tiny space between graphene nanosheets. As a result, the edges of the graphene nanosheets were efciently functionalized with bromophenyl groups due tothe inter­action between the 4-bromophenyl diazonium salt and thermally expanded graphite. Following the process, the edge-functionalized graphene nanosheets dispersedread­ily in DMF [87].
The incorporation of free radicals is also evident in polymer grafting on graphene processes. Anumber of well-known free radical polymerization techniques, including atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and reversible addition- fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT), have indeed been implemented to formulate polymer nano­composites comprising polymericchains deposited on the surface of graphene [3,88]. Previously, a polystyrene-polyacrylamide copolymer was grafted onto the graphene sheet via in-situ free radical polymerization of the monomers in the vicinity of dis­tributed graphene nanosheets. Through adjusting the monomer ratio, the amphiphilic characteristics of the graphene/copolymer composite may be modulated. Since the acrylamide monomer is hydrophilic as well as the styrene monomer is organophilic, they may both be dispersed in water and xylene, respectively [88].
3.3.2 non-coValenT FUncTionaliZaTion
Non-covalent functionalization is a potent technique frequentlyused for inducing desirable characteristics in graphene nanosheetswhile preventing desired loss of its parent properties. To establish non-covalent bonding, graphene delivers accessible