Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5932_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
13 Мб
Скачать
☆
316 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
to lessen them is to employ liposomal DOXwith a relatively short half-life by using glucuronate instead of the sulfate counterion of the ammonium being used for remote loading. In tumor-bearing animals, the administration of glucuronate, which has a permeability coefcient equivalent to sulfate yet fails to cause intra-liposome drug deposition, causes DOXto circulate more quickly, albeit without sacricing its ther­apeutic efcacy [16,29]. Avery little but noticeable impact on the PK is anticipated to lessen the buildup of DOXin the skin, lessening the intensity of PPE. There are additional ways to enhance nano-liposome-based chemotherapyand have improved control over drug release, including 1. the use of external methods like intensive ultrasound or hyperthermia; 2. the use of drug combinations by remotely loading two medications that work synergistically inside one liposome; and 3. the pairing of two distinct therapeutic approaches, like Doxil® and interleukin-2 (IL-2) [30].
After chemotherapy, the idea of triggering the host immune system to eliminate any remaining tumor cells has long been advocated. Since DOXis signicantly less harmful to innate immunity when given as Doxil® than when provided alone, it is used in conjunction with IL-2 considering IL-2 supplied in liposomes after Doxil® will bevery mucheffective. The theory underlying this chemo-immunotherapy reg­imen is that Doxil® may keep a hold onthe majority of the tumor volume. In con­trast, the immunotherapy evoked by the IL-2 will boost the still-functioning immune response, permitting it to eliminate the remaining tumor cells [30]. When liposomal IL-2 is used, its toxicity is reduced, and its lifetime in circulation is prolonged with­out losing any of its effectiveness [31,32].
The strategy employed lately by Jain and colleagues is highly promising. As a result, losartan, which suppresses collagen I formation, was utilized to alter the extracellular tumor environment, boosting the accumulation of Doxil® (and other nanoparticles) in tumors and enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of Doxil® [33].
12.3 DOCETAXEL-PNP FROM BASICS TO CLINICAL USE
Docetaxel (DTX) is frequently utilized as an anticancer agent used alone or in com­bination for non-small cell pulmonary, ovarian, breast, gastrointestinal, neck, pros­tate, and throatcancers. Its tumor-ghting system is the suppression of the mitotic spindle through binding to microtubules, causing the spindle and microtubulesto stabilize [34,35]. While DTX is a powerful anticancer agent, a drug for the therapy of a variety of cancers in unique chemical entities at different phases, it also has a few unfavorable cytotoxic consequences [36]. In a clinical context, the most serious non-hematological side effects of any taxane cytotoxic drug are central neurotoxicity and hypersensitivity [37].
Polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), being adifcult but also well-regulated drug delivery approach, take advantage of the water-insoluble medicines’ enhanced per­meability and retention (EPR) impact in malignancies [38]. PNP-assisted targeted drug delivery is anticipated by oncologists to enhance the chemotherapeutic benets of drugs on tumor tissues and lessen any negative effects on healthy tissue. Yet since PNP also serves as an exogenous substance that possesses the potential to produce toxicity due to its chemical characteristics, its biodegradability is essential to the efcacy of this medication.
317Journey of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems from Lab to Clinics
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
The effectiveness of the PNP encapsulated bydocetaxel (PNP-DTX) was evalu­ated by Song etal. (2016) in preclinical animal models, and the maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) was established using clinical testing [36]. Specialized mice models, such asorthotopic and subcutaneous, were employed for conducting the investiga­tion. Both the quantication of in-vivo imaging and the tumor development delay in the orthotopic model was assessed. Advanced tumors were the focus of a single­center, retrospective, open-label phase Iclinical investigation. Starting at 20 mg/m2, the intravenous injection of PNP-DTX was increased to 35 mg/m2, 45 mg/m2, 60 mg/ m2, and 75 mg/m2. In their study, the toxicities, tumor responses, and pharmacoki­netics were assessed effectively.
The preclinical ndings demonstrated that PNP-DTXnanoformulationhas a more effective antitumor activity compared todocetaxel (DTX). The subcutaneous model, meanwhile, did not show any distinction among PNP-DTX and DTX. A test for tubulin polymerization revealed that PNP-DTX maintained the original mechanism of action of DTX. The 18 participants in phase Iclinical study were examined. The MTD was estimated to be 75 mg/m2, and grade 4 neutropenia that did not last longer than seven days was the most prevalent adverse effect. According to observations, the C
of 60 mg/m2 PNP-DTX and AUC
max
of 45 mg/m2 PNP-DTX are equivalent
last
to those of 75 mg/m2 DTX (Figure12.2) [36]. Four patients haveexperienced par­tial remission (PR),which was justabout 22% of the total number of patients.The orthotopic animal model particularly demonstrated the effectiveness of PNP-DTX. Although the MTD of PNP-DTX would hardly be conrmed, it was tentatively esti­mated as75 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetic prole of the 45 mg/m2 PNP-DTX was identical to that of the 75 mg/m2 DTX.
During the clinical trials, although one trial patient died unexpectedly well before thesecond therapy session, the responses of 18 trial patients were evaluated. PR was present in two (11%)patients. Eight (44%) of the patients were determined to have SD (stable disease), whereas the remaining eight (44%) had progressing disease (PD). Those who demonstrated PR were assigned to Group 4 (60 mg/m2), where there was a 40% objective response rate (2/5 patients). PR was attained for the maximum response in four (22%) of the 18 patients. Six patients (33%) exhibited SD, whereas eight patients (44%) displayed PD. The clinical results over the tumors by PNP-DTX in each of the patients are provided in Table12.1 [36]. Through a preclinical investi­gation ofan orthotopic mouse model, they haveshown that PNP-DTX is much more effective against pancreatic cancer.
12.4 SUMMARY
In this chapter, we have highlighted the signicance and steps involved in the drug development process. The technical, investigative, and managerial operations com­prised in these processes were also addressed, which entails the guidelines required for a nano-drug to acquire approval from regulatory authorities like FDA. In line with this, the important aspects of Doxil approved by the FDA have been described with its importance, PK, and toxicological investigation. Doxil®, a chemotherapeutic nano-drug, performed better therapeuti­cally than free DOX(standard of care) in a number of neoplastic disorders because
®
being the rst nano-drug formulation
318 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
FIGURE 12.2 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Outcomes of PNP-DTX during Phase I Clinical Trials [36].
TABLE 12.1
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Response of Tumors to PNP-DTX in Each Patient [36].
Response after
Group (Dose) No Primary Disease
1 (20mg/m 12 Colon PD PD 13 Rectum SD SD 14 Colon SD SD 15 Colon SD SD 16 Colon PD PD 2 (35mg/m 22 Cervix PD PD 23 Colon PD PD 3 (45mg/m 32 Bladder SD SD 33 Colon PD PD 4 (60mg/m 42 Adrenal PD PD 43 NSCLC N/A 44 Breast PR PR 45 Bladder PR PR  46 Kidney SD SD 5 (75mg/m
2
) 11 Colon PD PD
2
) 21 Colon PD PD
2
) 31 Breast SD PR
2
) 41 Breast SD SD
2
) 51 Pancreas SD PR
SecondCycle Maximal Response
*
N/A
319Journey of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems from Lab to Clinics
*
of its distinct EPR-related PKand biodistribution, which lessen side effects (espe­cially notable is the massive decline in cardiotoxicity) and increase patient adherence and life expectancy altogether. In combination with the remote loading of DOXinto the long-circulating nano-liposomes, they have increased the anticancer therapeu­tic effectiveness of DOX as compared to conventional DOX(in specic cancers,
®
like ovarian cancer). This illustrates why Doxil
enjoys the most widespread clinical usage out of the >12 liposomal medications authorized for clinical use. Furthermore, the preclinical assessments of potential PNP-based nano-drug delivery systems (PNP-DTX) were described, which suggest the suitable efcacy of these formula­tions. However, a comprehensive investigation of toxicological and biodistribution aspects is obligatory, along with the clinical trials, for their approval.
REFERENCES
[1] L. Mller, A. Lhe, Preclinical Safety Testing, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceutical Medi-
cine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 101–136. doi:10.1002/9781444317800.ch3.
[2] P.N. Confalone, Principles of Process Research and Chemical Development in the Phar-
maceutical Industry by Oljan Repic. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998): pp. xvi, 213, 16 × 24 cm. ISBN 0-471-16516-6. $74.95. doi:10.1021/jm980248n.
320 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
[3] H.P. Rang, R.G. Hill, Drug Development, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Cambridge (2013):
pp. 203–209. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7020-4299-7.00014-7.
[ 4] P.D. Stonier, Development of medicines: Full development, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceuti-
cal Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 270–284. doi:10.1002/9781444317800. ch9.
[5] S. Warrington, Purpose and design of clinical trials, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceutical
Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 185–206. doi:10.1002/9781444317800. ch6.
[6] P. Rolan, V. Molnr, Clinical pharmacokinetics, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceutical Med-
icine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 167–184. doi:10.1002/9781444317800.ch5.
[7] R.B. Weiss, The anthracyclines: Will we ever nd a better doxorubicin? Semin. Oncol. 19
(1992) 670–686. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/1462166.
[8] G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, G. Cairo, L. Gianni, Anthracyclines: Molecular
advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity, Pharmacol. Rev. 56 (2004) 185–229. doi:10.1124/pr.56.2.6.
[9] X. Peng, The cardiotoxicology of anthracycline chemotherapeutics: Translating molecu-
lar mechanism into preventative medicine, Mol. Interv. 5 (2005) 163–171. doi:10.1124/ mi.5.3.6.
[10] C.H. Takimoto, E. Calvo, Principles of oncologic pharmacotherapy, Cancer Manag.
Multidiscip. Approach. 11 (2008) 1–9.
[11] J. Kenyon, Chemotherapy and Cardiac Toxicity—the Lesser of Two Evils, Dr. Lounge
Website (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736167/.
[12] A. Gabizon, R. Shiota, D. Papahadjopoulos, Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of
doxorubicin encapsulated in stable liposomes with long circulation times, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81 (1989) 1484–1488. doi:10.1093/jnci/81.19.1484.
[13] A.A. Gabizon, Y. Barenholz, M. Bialer, Prolongation of the circulation time of doxoru-
bicin encapsulated in liposomes containing a polyethylene glycol-derivatized phospho­lipid: Pharmacokinetic studies in rodents and dogs, Pharm. Res. 10 (1993) 703–708. doi:10.1023/A:1018907715905.
[14] D. Papahadjopoulos, T.M. Allen, A. Gabizon, E. Mayhew, K. Matthay, S.K. Huang, K.D.
Lee, M.C. Woodle, D.D. Lasic, C. Redemann, Sterically stabilized liposomes: Improve­ments in pharmacokinetics and antitumor therapeutic efcacy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88 (1991) 11460–11464. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11460.
[15] A.A. Gabizon, Selective tumor localization and improved therapeutic index of anthra-
cyclines encapsulated in long-circulating liposomes, Cancer Res. 52 (1992) 891–896. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1737351.
[16] Y. (Chezy) Barenholz, Doxil®—the rst FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned, J.
Control. Release. 160 (2012) 117–134. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020.
[17] D. Peer (Ed.), Handbook of Harnessing Biomaterials in Nanomedicine, Jenny Stanford
Publishing, Dubai (2021). doi:10.1201/9781003125259.
[18] A. Gabizon, R. Catane, B. Uziely, B. Kaufman, T. Safra, R. Cohen, F. Martin, A. Huang,
Y. Barenholz, Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exu­dates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes, Cancer Res. 54 (1994) 987–92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8313389.
[19] A. Gabizon, H. Shmeeda, Y. Barenholz, Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxoru-
bicin, Clin. Pharmacokinet. 42 (2003) 419–436. doi:10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002.
[20] Y. Barenholz, Relevancy of drug loading to liposomal formulation therapeutic efcacy,
J. Liposome Res. 13 (2003) 1–8. doi:10.1081/LPR-120017482.
[21] J. Szebeni, C.R. Alving, L. Rosivall, R. Bünger, L. Baranyi, P. Bedöcs, M. Tóth, Y.
Barenholz, Animal models of complement-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to liposomes and other lipid-based nanoparticles, J. Liposome Res. 17 (2007) 107–117. doi:10.1080/08982100701375118.
321Journey of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems from Lab to Clinics
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
[22] Z. Symon, A. Peyser, D. Tzemach, O. Lyass, E. Sucher, E. Shezen, A. Gabizon, Selec-
tive delivery of doxorubicin to patients with breast carcinoma metastases by stealth liposomes, Cancer. 86 (1999) 72–78. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990701)
< 72::AID-CNCR12 > 3.0.CO;2-1.
86:1
[23] S. Druckmann, A. Gabizon, Y. Barenholz, Separation of liposome-associated doxoru-
bicin from non-liposome-associated doxorubicin in human plasma: Implications for pharmacokinetic studies, Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 980 (1989) 381–384. doi:10.1016/0005-2736(89)90329-5.
[24] S. Amselem, Y. Barenholz, A. Gabizon, Optimization and upscaling of doxorubicin-
containing liposomes for clinical use, J. Pharm. Sci. 79 (1990) 1045–1052. doi:10.1002/ jps.2600791202.
[25] R. Solomon, A.A. Gabizon, Clinical pharmacology of liposomal anthracyclines: Focus
on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma. 8 (2008) 21–32. doi:10.3816/CLM.2008.n.001.
[26] D.S. Alberts, P.Y. Liu, S.P. Wilczynski, M.C. Clouser, A.M. Lopez, D.P. Michelin, V.J.
Lanzotti, M. Markman, Randomized trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus carboplatin versus carboplatin in platinum-sensitive (PS) patients with recurrent epithe­lial ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma after failure of initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Southwest Onc. Gynecol. Oncol. 108 (2008) 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.075.
[27] F. Joly, I. Ray-Coquard, M. Fabbro, M. Donoghoe, K. Boman, A. Sugimoto, M. Vaughan,
A. Reinthaller, I. Vergote, G. Ferrandina, T. Dell’Anna, J. Huober, E. Pujade-Lauraine, Decreased hypersensitivity reactions with carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared to carboplatin-paclitaxel combination: Analysis from the GCIG CALYPSO relapsing ovarian cancer trial, Gynecol. Oncol. 122 (2011) 226–232. doi:10.1016/j. ygyno.2011.04.019.
[28] J. Szebeni, Y.C. Barenholz, Complement activation, immunogenicity, and immune suppres-
sion as potential side effects of liposomes, in: Advances in Clinical Immunology, Medical Microbiology, COVID-19, Big Data, Jenny Stanford Publishing, Dubai (2021): pp.
55–75.
[29] A. Gabizon, Y. Barenholz, Method for Drug Loading in Liposomes, US 2005/0129753
A1 (2005).
[30] A. Cabanes, S. Even-Chen, J. Zimberoff, Y. Barenholz, E. Kedar, A. Gabizon, Enhance-
ment of antitumor activity of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin with soluble and liposomal interleukin 21, Clin. Cancer Res. 5 (1999) 687–693.
[31] E. Kedar, Y. Rutkowski, E. Braun, N. Emanuel, Y. Barenholz, Delivery of cytokines by
liposomes. I: Preparation and characterization of interleukin-2 encapsulated in long­circulating sterically stabilized liposomes, J. Immunother. 16 (1994). https://journals. lww.com/immunotherapy-journal/Fulltext/1994/07000/Delivery_of_Cytokines_by_ Liposomes__I__Preparation.5.aspx.
[32] E. Kedar, E. Braun, Y. Rutkowski, N. Emanuel, Y. Barenholz, Delivery of cytokines by
liposomes. II: Interleukin-2 encapsulated in long-circulating sterically stabilized lipos­omes: Immunomodulatory and anti-tumor activity in mice, J. Immunother. 16 (1994). https://journals.lww.com/immunotherapy-journal/Fulltext/1994/08000/Delivery_ of_Cytokines_by_Liposomes__II_.5.aspx.
[33] B. Diop-Frimpong, V.P. Chauhan, S. Krane, Y. Boucher, R.K. Jain, Losartan inhibits col-
lagen I synthesis and improves the distribution and efcacy of nanotherapeutics in tum­ors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 (2011) 2909–2914. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018892108.
[34] A.-M.C. Yvon, P. Wadsworth, M.A. Jordan, Taxol suppresses dynamics of individ-
ual microtubules in living human tumor cells, Mol. Biol. Cell. 10 (1999) 947–959. doi:10.1091/mbc.10.4.947.
[35] R. Pazdur, A.P. Kudelka, J.J. Kavanagh, P.R. Cohen, M.N. Raber, The taxoids: Pacl-
itaxel (Taxol®) and docetaxel (Taxotere®), Cancer Treat. Rev. 19 (1993) 351–386. doi:10.1016/0305-7372(93)90010-O.
322 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
[36] S.Y. Song, K. Kim, S.-Y. Jeong, J. Park, J. Park, J. Jung, H.K. Chung, S.-W. Lee,
M.H. Seo, J. Lee, K.H. Jung, E.K. Choi, Polymeric nanoparticle-docetaxel for the treatment of advanced solid tumors: Phase I clinical trial and preclinical data from an orthotopic pancreatic cancer model, Oncotarget. 7 (2016) 77348–77357. doi:10.18632/ oncotarget.12668.
[37] B. van Oijen, M. Pleunis, F. Erdkamp, R. Prevoo, H. van der Kuy, Toxic dermatitis in
patients treated with Taxotere® (docetaxel): Three case reports, Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 49 (2011) 46–48. doi:10.5414/CPP49046.
[38] J.M. Chan, P.M. Valencia, L. Zhang, R. Langer, O.C. Farokhzad, Polymeric nan-
oparticles for drug delivery, in: S.R. Grobmyer, B.M. Moudgil (Eds.), Cancer Nano­technology Methods Protocols, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ (2010): pp. 163–175. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_11.
Index
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A
ablation 4, 64, 67, 68, 72, 87, 125, 126, 128, 148,
212, 263, 289 acetate 47, 216 acetic 212 Acetobacters 211 acetone 211 acetylation 107, 215 acetylcholine 142, 225, 229 acetylene 68, 72, 125, 126, 130 acid-chitosan-g-poly 83, 208 acrylamide 24, 75, 78, 83, 208 activation-modulated 43, 44, 56 adenocarcinoma 112 adenocarcinomic 266 adenosine 77, 194, 270 aeruginosa 223 AFM 15, 106, 226 A-glycodendrimer 220 alginate-poly-l-lysine-alginate 225 alkyl cyanoacrylates 210 alveolar 266, 274 alveolar-capillary 265 Alzheimer’s 113, 114, 141, 142, 172, 195, 218,
– 227, 229, 290
225 amidoamine 220 amino silane 216 amoxicillin-controlled 213 amperometric 220 anthracyclines 311 antibacterial 8, 51, 75, 212
249, 271, 301 anticancer 8, 20, 21, 82, 84, 107, 109
– 137, 139 – 141, 157, 158, 168, 170, 174,
135
176, 194, 207
255, 258, 293, 294, 296, 303, 311, 312, 316,
319 anticoagulant 80 anti-epcam 113 antifungal 248 antigens 19, 20, 52, 54, 244, 246, 255 antimicrobial 202, 222, 223, 295 antimitotic 297 anti-neoplastic 297 antioxidant 3, 85, 112, 186, 194, 195 antitumor 112, 170, 278, 312, 317 aptamers 20, 44, 53, 111, 116, 175 arginine-glycine-aspartic 209 asialoglycoprotein 296 atherosclerosis 194
– 276
– 214, 220, 222, 248,
– 112, 116,
– 211, 218, 224, 225, 229, 247,
aziridine 72, 73 azomethine 72
B
Bacillus 301 bacteria 194, 203, 211
279, 301, 304, 311 bacteriophage-based 295 bacteriophages 295, 296, 304 basidiomycetes 223 basophils 3, 186 BBB 21, 54, 141, 157, 170, 227, 289 benzene 11, 61, 62, 132, 164, 184, 188 betaxololchlorhydrate 210 betulinic 294 bienzymatic 219 bilayer 50, 68, 195, 215, 266, 312 bimetallic 218 bioaccumulation 291 bioadhesion 254 bio-adsorbent 24 biocatalysts 204, 219 bioengineering 220, 221, 297 biofunctionalized 2, 12, 71 bioimaging 2, 7, 8, 13, 20, 52, 98, 104, 123, 137,
138, 156, 166, 168, 175, 206, 207, 264, 297, 303 biomarker 20, 146 biopolymer 164, 229 bio-responsive 44 biosensing 2, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 52, 63, 98, 123, 137,
166, 206, 264, 299
138, biosensor 21, 79, 220 bisphenol 219 bis-phosphonate 112 blood-brain barrier 21, 54, 114, 141, 157, 170,
193, 194, 227, 265, 289, 303 blood-cerebrospinal 289 blood-retinal 292 borohydride 105, 213 boron-doped 271 BRB 142, 292 bromophenyl 75 bronchoalveolar 275 Buckyballs 184, 185 Buckysomes 193
, 214, 222, 223, 248, 251,
– 291
– 190, 220
C
Caenorhabditis 269, 272 calcitonin 253
323
324 Index
camptothecin 107, 111, 294 cancerous 20, 21, 54, 80, 82, 111, 139, 291, 314 caprolactone 213 carbene 72, 74 carbodiimide 107 carboxybetaine 249 carboxylic 55, 63, 77, 107, 108, 133, 134, 172,
191, 205, 225, 249 carboxymethyl 170 carcinogenic 84, 205, 279 cardiomyocytes 87, 144, 146 catalyst 6, 69, 79, 125, 126, 128 catalyst-assisted 123 cellulose 47, 78, 140, 160, 170, 202, 203, 211,
213, 214, 221, 222, 229 ceramic 202, 221 cerebral 142, 225, 229, 247 cervical 139, 257, 269 chelerythrine 294 chemo-gene-photothermal 84 chemo-immunotherapy 316 chemo-photothermal 84, 110 chemotherapeutic 54, 80, 82, 86, 110, 116, 140,
168, 170, 174, 176, 207, 208, 223, 224, 257,
296, 311, 316, 317 chirality 5, 9, 123, 124, 129 chitosan 14, 21, 78, 99, 107,
140, 146, 164, 170, 202, 203, 206, 208, 209,
– 214, 229, 250, 253, 294
212 chlorophenyl-functionalized 75 chloroquine 84 cholesterol 50, 226, 292, 312 cholinergic 225 cholinesterase 226 CMC 170, 213 CMF 211 CNC 211, 212 CNF 211, 212 CNM 288, 289, 294 CNOs 290, 291 CNS 9, 26, 141, 148, 193, 216, 227 CNT 9, 16, 22, 125, 130
148, 174, 204, 205, 219, 220, 254, 267 CNT-dendrimer 220 CNT-GelMA 146 CNT-PAMAM 219 CNT-polymer 135 collagen 144, 209, 221, 316 colloidal 12, 20, 52
156, 162, 213, 248, 264, 278 colon 112, 139, 140, 216, 225, 251, 254, 258, 259, 319 contaminants 23
– 132, 163, 166
130 contraceptive 210 cortical 195, 226 CPMV 295, 297 CQDs 4, 5, 24, 26, 273, 294 CSP 24
– 54, 63, 72, 135, 140, 141,
– 26, 67, 71, 102, 125, 128,
– 131, 135, 298
109, 110, 113,
– 133, 135 – 137, 144 – 146,
CVD 14, 64, 68
164, 187 cyanoacrylate 210, 227 cyanoacrylate-co-hexadecyl 210 cyclodextrin–fullerene 199 cyclodextrins 191 cyclohexane-chloroform 210 cytidine 77 cytocompatibility 175 cytoskeleton 265, 267 cytosols 21, 54, 170 cytotoxic 112, 140, 166, 216, 267, 270, 297, 316
– 71, 87, 124 – 126, 130, 148,
D
daunorubicin 209, 311 DaunoXome 209 DCA 258 DCC 107 DDS 21, 39, 41
106, 107, 112, 115, 137, 140, 141, 170, 201,
207, 244 DEAP-Lys 290 dehydrogenase 21, 140, 141, 220, 258, 270 delamination 211 dendrimer 51, 215 dendrimer-carbon-nanotube 219 Dendrimer-grafted 216, 217 dendrimer-NP 217, 218 dendrimer-QD 218, 219 D-enzyme 79 dexamethasone 83 dextroamphetamine 42 DFT 25 diabetes 227 diacetate-acetoxymethyl 266 diaminobutane-based 219 diaminotriethylene 225 diamond-based 15 diazirine 74 diazobenzene 108 diazonium 74, 75, 108 dichlorocarbene 74 Diels-Alder 191 dienophiles 72 diffusion-controlled 46, 47 dimethylaminoethyl 250 dimethyl-imidazolidinone 5 dioxide 23, 24, 70, 256 dipalmitoylphosphati-dylcholine 110 dipole-induced 300 DME 293 DMEU 5 DMF 72, 74, 75, 163 DMSO 111, 112 DNA-functionalized 78 docetaxel 82, 316, 317 DOCETAXEL-PNP 316
– 44, 46, 47, 56, 80, 81, 83, 84,
– 249, 251 – 253
– 220, 252, 292
325 Index
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
donepezil 142, 227 DOX 21, 54, 82
157, 158, 168, 170, 175, 208, 216, 224, 229,
258, 294, 296, 299, 311 DOX-GO 208 DOX-GQD-FA 157 Doxil 209, 224, 311 doxorubicin 21, 54, 82, 107, 112, 139, 157, 168, 193,
209 doxorubicin-methano-C 193 DP 209, 210 DPPC 110 drug-carrying 210 drug-loading 12, 48, 63, 140, 141 drug-polymer 210 drug-release 141, 208 drug-resistance-related 258 DSNPs 217 DTX 316, 317 dual-polymer-GO 113 dual-responsive 84, 96
– 84, 107, 109, 110, 112, 139, 140,
– 317, 319
– 317, 319
– 211, 216, 224, 229, 258, 290, 294, 311 – 314
E
EBI 165 ECM 86 EDA 24 edge-functionalized 75, 156, 159 EDX 15, 16, 106 EGF 224, 255 EGFP 112 electrical-responsive 87 electrochemical 5, 8, 9, 64
electrode 65, 77, 128, 160, 218 electrospun 146, 214, 251 embryonic 15, 21, 86, 139 emulsion 209, 227, 228, 252, 253 encapsulated 35, 74, 79, 83, 113, 175, 215, 218,
endocrine 23 endogenous 194, 244, 259 endosomes 211, 219, 302 enzymatic 2, 4, 45, 85, 186, 211, 220, 223, 225 enzyme-powered 299 epilepsy 289 epirubicin 311 epitaxial 64, 75, 204 epithelium 251, epoxide 11, 62, 204, 263 epoxy 13, 16, 18, 52, 65, 72, 81, 98, 99, 106,
erythrodysesthesia 315 erythromycin 221 Ethylenediamine 24 ethylenimine 85, 250 exfoliation 18, 64 exogenous 86, 194, 259, 316
– 161, 177, 178, 190, 212, 219, 231
141, 158
220, 248, 253, 255, 317
267, 292
156, 205
– 67, 75, 100, 101, 104, 159, 204, 271
– 67, 77, 93, 104,
extracts 41, 212 Ezema 87
– 214, 222, 229, 270, 273
F
FA 14, 20, 21, 53, 54, 83, 84, 107, 108, 110, 139,
208 FA-conjugated 84 FAM-ssDNA 299 FBRs 126 FCCD 142 f-CNTs 144 FDA 48, 49, 210, 286, 303, 311, 312, 317 feces 273, 275 femoral 22, 144 Fenton 256, 257 ferritin 168 ferromagnetic 291 Fibrillar 211 Field-induced 307 Fluorescence 138, 179 Fluorinated-dendrimer 219 FNDs 15 fullerene 2
fullerenols 191, 194, 195, 278 fullerosomes 4, 187
– 4, 11, 24, 25, 52, 61, 182, 204, 220,
– 279, 288, 291
264, 273
G
GA 82, 85, 114 gadofullerenes 4, 187 gadolinium 4, 187, 301 GaInSn 300 Galactosamine 209 Galactose 290 galantamine 142 galectin 296 gallium-apatite 223 gastrointestinal 40, 42, 44, 225, 228, 229, 245,
251, 253, 316 gastro-retentive 251 G-band 17 GBN 12, 63, 264 GBNs 11, 12, 62, 63, 263 GCE 113 Gd-MSN 301 gelatin 22, 144, 146, 209, 214 gelatin-alginate 85, 114 gene-chemo 84 gene-gun-impregnated 172 genetic 84, 111 genome 112, 294 genotoxic 278, 279 GLDH-Pt-PAMAM 220 glial 114 glioblastoma 194, 219, 266, 289 glomerulonephritis 228
, 112, 141, 215, 221, 227, 228, 248, 294