Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5932_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
316 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
to lessen them is to employ liposomal DOXwith a relatively short half-life by using
glucuronate instead of the sulfate counterion of the ammonium being used for remote
loading. In tumor-bearing animals, the administration of glucuronate, which has a
permeability coefcient equivalent to sulfate yet fails to cause intra-liposome drug
deposition, causes DOXto circulate more quickly, albeit without sacricing its therapeutic efcacy [16,29]. Avery little but noticeable impact on the PK is anticipated
to lessen the buildup of DOXin the skin, lessening the intensity of PPE. There are
additional ways to enhance nano-liposome-based chemotherapyand have improved
control over drug release, including 1. the use of external methods like intensive
ultrasound or hyperthermia; 2. the use of drug combinations by remotely loading two
medications that work synergistically inside one liposome; and 3. the pairing of two
distinct therapeutic approaches, like Doxil® and interleukin-2 (IL-2) [30].
After chemotherapy, the idea of triggering the host immune system to eliminate
any remaining tumor cells has long been advocated. Since DOXis signicantly less
harmful to innate immunity when given as Doxil® than when provided alone, it is
used in conjunction with IL-2 considering IL-2 supplied in liposomes after Doxil®
will bevery mucheffective. The theory underlying this chemo-immunotherapy regimen is that Doxil® may keep a hold onthe majority of the tumor volume. In contrast, the immunotherapy evoked by the IL-2 will boost the still-functioning immune
response, permitting it to eliminate the remaining tumor cells [30]. When liposomal
IL-2 is used, its toxicity is reduced, and its lifetime in circulation is prolonged without losing any of its effectiveness [31,32].
The strategy employed lately by Jain and colleagues is highly promising. As a
result, losartan, which suppresses collagen I formation, was utilized to alter the
extracellular tumor environment, boosting the accumulation of Doxil® (and other
nanoparticles) in tumors and enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of Doxil® [33].
12.3 DOCETAXEL-PNP FROM BASICS TO CLINICAL USE
Docetaxel (DTX) is frequently utilized as an anticancer agent used alone or in combination for non-small cell pulmonary, ovarian, breast, gastrointestinal, neck, prostate, and throatcancers. Its tumor-ghting system is the suppression of the mitotic
spindle through binding to microtubules, causing the spindle and microtubulesto
stabilize [34,35]. While DTX is a powerful anticancer agent, a drug for the therapy
of a variety of cancers in unique chemical entities at different phases, it also has a
few unfavorable cytotoxic consequences [36]. In a clinical context, the most serious
non-hematological side effects of any taxane cytotoxic drug are central neurotoxicity
and hypersensitivity [37].
Polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs), being adifcult but also well-regulated drug
delivery approach, take advantage of the water-insoluble medicines’ enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) impact in malignancies [38]. PNP-assisted targeted
drug delivery is anticipated by oncologists to enhance the chemotherapeutic benets
of drugs on tumor tissues and lessen any negative effects on healthy tissue. Yet since
PNP also serves as an exogenous substance that possesses the potential to produce
toxicity due to its chemical characteristics, its biodegradability is essential to the
efcacy of this medication.

317Journey of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems from Lab to Clinics
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
The effectiveness of the PNP encapsulated bydocetaxel (PNP-DTX) was evaluated by Song etal. (2016) in preclinical animal models, and the maximum tolerated
dosage (MTD) was established using clinical testing [36]. Specialized mice models,
such asorthotopic and subcutaneous, were employed for conducting the investigation. Both the quantication of in-vivo imaging and the tumor development delay
in the orthotopic model was assessed. Advanced tumors were the focus of a singlecenter, retrospective, open-label phase Iclinical investigation. Starting at 20 mg/m2,
the intravenous injection of PNP-DTX was increased to 35 mg/m2, 45 mg/m2, 60 mg/
m2, and 75 mg/m2. In their study, the toxicities, tumor responses, and pharmacokinetics were assessed effectively.
The preclinical ndings demonstrated that PNP-DTXnanoformulationhas a more
effective antitumor activity compared todocetaxel (DTX). The subcutaneous model,
meanwhile, did not show any distinction among PNP-DTX and DTX. A test for
tubulin polymerization revealed that PNP-DTX maintained the original mechanism
of action of DTX. The 18 participants in phase Iclinical study were examined. The
MTD was estimated to be 75 mg/m2, and grade 4 neutropenia that did not last longer
than seven days was the most prevalent adverse effect. According to observations,
the C
of 60 mg/m2 PNP-DTX and AUC
max
of 45 mg/m2 PNP-DTX are equivalent
last
to those of 75 mg/m2 DTX (Figure12.2) [36]. Four patients haveexperienced partial remission (PR),which was justabout 22% of the total number of patients.The
orthotopic animal model particularly demonstrated the effectiveness of PNP-DTX.
Although the MTD of PNP-DTX would hardly be conrmed, it was tentatively estimated as75 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetic prole of the 45 mg/m2 PNP-DTX was
identical to that of the 75 mg/m2 DTX.
During the clinical trials, although one trial patient died unexpectedly well before
thesecond therapy session, the responses of 18 trial patients were evaluated. PR was
present in two (11%)patients. Eight (44%) of the patients were determined to have
SD (stable disease), whereas the remaining eight (44%) had progressing disease (PD).
Those who demonstrated PR were assigned to Group 4 (60 mg/m2), where there
was a 40% objective response rate (2/5 patients). PR was attained for the maximum
response in four (22%) of the 18 patients. Six patients (33%) exhibited SD, whereas
eight patients (44%) displayed PD. The clinical results over the tumors by PNP-DTX
in each of the patients are provided in Table12.1 [36]. Through a preclinical investigation ofan orthotopic mouse model, they haveshown that PNP-DTX is much more
effective against pancreatic cancer.
12.4 SUMMARY
In this chapter, we have highlighted the signicance and steps involved in the drug
development process. The technical, investigative, and managerial operations comprised in these processes were also addressed, which entails the guidelines required
for a nano-drug to acquire approval from regulatory authorities like FDA. In line
with this, the important aspects of Doxil
approved by the FDA have been described with its importance, PK, and toxicological
investigation. Doxil®, a chemotherapeutic nano-drug, performed better therapeutically than free DOX(standard of care) in a number of neoplastic disorders because
®
being the rst nano-drug formulation

318 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
FIGURE 12.2 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Outcomes of PNP-DTX during Phase I Clinical Trials [36].

TABLE 12.1
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Response of Tumors to PNP-DTX in Each Patient [36].
Response after
Group (Dose) No Primary Disease
1 (20mg/m
12 Colon PD PD
13 Rectum SD SD
14 Colon SD SD
15 Colon SD SD
16 Colon PD PD
2 (35mg/m
22 Cervix PD PD
23 Colon PD PD
3 (45mg/m
32 Bladder SD SD
33 Colon PD PD
4 (60mg/m
42 Adrenal PD PD
43 NSCLC N/A
44 Breast PR PR
45 Bladder PR PR
46 Kidney SD SD
5 (75mg/m
2
) 11 Colon PD PD
2
) 21 Colon PD PD
2
) 31 Breast SD PR
2
) 41 Breast SD SD
2
) 51 Pancreas SD PR
SecondCycle Maximal Response
*
N/A
319Journey of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems from Lab to Clinics
*
of its distinct EPR-related PKand biodistribution, which lessen side effects (especially notable is the massive decline in cardiotoxicity) and increase patient adherence
and life expectancy altogether. In combination with the remote loading of DOXinto
the long-circulating nano-liposomes, they have increased the anticancer therapeutic effectiveness of DOX as compared to conventional DOX(in specic cancers,
®
like ovarian cancer). This illustrates why Doxil
enjoys the most widespread clinical
usage out of the >12 liposomal medications authorized for clinical use. Furthermore,
the preclinical assessments of potential PNP-based nano-drug delivery systems
(PNP-DTX) were described, which suggest the suitable efcacy of these formulations. However, a comprehensive investigation of toxicological and biodistribution
aspects is obligatory, along with the clinical trials, for their approval.
REFERENCES
[1] L. Mller, A. Lhe, Preclinical Safety Testing, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceutical Medi-
cine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 101–136. doi:10.1002/9781444317800.ch3.
[2] P.N. Confalone, Principles of Process Research and Chemical Development in the Phar-
maceutical Industry by Oljan Repic. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998): pp. xvi, 213,
16 × 24 cm. ISBN 0-471-16516-6. $74.95. doi:10.1021/jm980248n.

320 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
[3] H.P. Rang, R.G. Hill, Drug Development, 2nd ed., Elsevier, Cambridge (2013):
pp. 203–209. doi:10.1016/B978-0-7020-4299-7.00014-7.
[ 4] P.D. Stonier, Development of medicines: Full development, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceuti-
cal Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 270–284. doi:10.1002/9781444317800.
ch9.
[5] S. Warrington, Purpose and design of clinical trials, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceutical
Medicine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 185–206. doi:10.1002/9781444317800.
ch6.
[6] P. Rolan, V. Molnr, Clinical pharmacokinetics, in: The Textbook of Pharmaceutical Med-
icine, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford (2009): pp. 167–184. doi:10.1002/9781444317800.ch5.
[7] R.B. Weiss, The anthracyclines: Will we ever nd a better doxorubicin? Semin. Oncol. 19
(1992) 670–686. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/1462166.
[8] G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, G. Cairo, L. Gianni, Anthracyclines: Molecular
advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity,
Pharmacol. Rev. 56 (2004) 185–229. doi:10.1124/pr.56.2.6.
[9] X. Peng, The cardiotoxicology of anthracycline chemotherapeutics: Translating molecu-
lar mechanism into preventative medicine, Mol. Interv. 5 (2005) 163–171. doi:10.1124/
mi.5.3.6.
[10] C.H. Takimoto, E. Calvo, Principles of oncologic pharmacotherapy, Cancer Manag.
Multidiscip. Approach. 11 (2008) 1–9.
[11] J. Kenyon, Chemotherapy and Cardiac Toxicity—the Lesser of Two Evils, Dr. Lounge
Website (2010). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7736167/.
[12] A. Gabizon, R. Shiota, D. Papahadjopoulos, Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of
doxorubicin encapsulated in stable liposomes with long circulation times, J. Natl. Cancer
Inst. 81 (1989) 1484–1488. doi:10.1093/jnci/81.19.1484.
[13] A.A. Gabizon, Y. Barenholz, M. Bialer, Prolongation of the circulation time of doxoru-
bicin encapsulated in liposomes containing a polyethylene glycol-derivatized phospholipid: Pharmacokinetic studies in rodents and dogs, Pharm. Res. 10 (1993) 703–708.
doi:10.1023/A:1018907715905.
[14] D. Papahadjopoulos, T.M. Allen, A. Gabizon, E. Mayhew, K. Matthay, S.K. Huang, K.D.
Lee, M.C. Woodle, D.D. Lasic, C. Redemann, Sterically stabilized liposomes: Improvements in pharmacokinetics and antitumor therapeutic efcacy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88
(1991) 11460–11464. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11460.
[15] A.A. Gabizon, Selective tumor localization and improved therapeutic index of anthra-
cyclines encapsulated in long-circulating liposomes, Cancer Res. 52 (1992) 891–896.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1737351.
[16] Y. (Chezy) Barenholz, Doxil®—the rst FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned, J.
Control. Release. 160 (2012) 117–134. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.020.
[17] D. Peer (Ed.), Handbook of Harnessing Biomaterials in Nanomedicine, Jenny Stanford
Publishing, Dubai (2021). doi:10.1201/9781003125259.
[18] A. Gabizon, R. Catane, B. Uziely, B. Kaufman, T. Safra, R. Cohen, F. Martin, A. Huang,
Y. Barenholz, Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes, Cancer Res.
54 (1994) 987–92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8313389.
[19] A. Gabizon, H. Shmeeda, Y. Barenholz, Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxoru-
bicin, Clin. Pharmacokinet. 42 (2003) 419–436. doi:10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002.
[20] Y. Barenholz, Relevancy of drug loading to liposomal formulation therapeutic efcacy,
J. Liposome Res. 13 (2003) 1–8. doi:10.1081/LPR-120017482.
[21] J. Szebeni, C.R. Alving, L. Rosivall, R. Bünger, L. Baranyi, P. Bedöcs, M. Tóth, Y.
Barenholz, Animal models of complement-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to
liposomes and other lipid-based nanoparticles, J. Liposome Res. 17 (2007) 107–117.
doi:10.1080/08982100701375118.

321Journey of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems from Lab to Clinics
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
[22] Z. Symon, A. Peyser, D. Tzemach, O. Lyass, E. Sucher, E. Shezen, A. Gabizon, Selec-
tive delivery of doxorubicin to patients with breast carcinoma metastases by stealth
liposomes, Cancer. 86 (1999) 72–78. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990701)
< 72::AID-CNCR12 > 3.0.CO;2-1.
86:1
[23] S. Druckmann, A. Gabizon, Y. Barenholz, Separation of liposome-associated doxoru-
bicin from non-liposome-associated doxorubicin in human plasma: Implications for
pharmacokinetic studies, Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 980 (1989) 381–384.
doi:10.1016/0005-2736(89)90329-5.
[24] S. Amselem, Y. Barenholz, A. Gabizon, Optimization and upscaling of doxorubicin-
containing liposomes for clinical use, J. Pharm. Sci. 79 (1990) 1045–1052. doi:10.1002/
jps.2600791202.
[25] R. Solomon, A.A. Gabizon, Clinical pharmacology of liposomal anthracyclines: Focus
on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma. 8 (2008) 21–32.
doi:10.3816/CLM.2008.n.001.
[26] D.S. Alberts, P.Y. Liu, S.P. Wilczynski, M.C. Clouser, A.M. Lopez, D.P. Michelin, V.J.
Lanzotti, M. Markman, Randomized trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus
carboplatin versus carboplatin in platinum-sensitive (PS) patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma after failure of initial platinum-based chemotherapy.
Southwest Onc. Gynecol. Oncol. 108 (2008) 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.08.075.
[27] F. Joly, I. Ray-Coquard, M. Fabbro, M. Donoghoe, K. Boman, A. Sugimoto, M. Vaughan,
A. Reinthaller, I. Vergote, G. Ferrandina, T. Dell’Anna, J. Huober, E. Pujade-Lauraine,
Decreased hypersensitivity reactions with carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin
compared to carboplatin-paclitaxel combination: Analysis from the GCIG CALYPSO
relapsing ovarian cancer trial, Gynecol. Oncol. 122 (2011) 226–232. doi:10.1016/j.
ygyno.2011.04.019.
[28] J. Szebeni, Y.C. Barenholz, Complement activation, immunogenicity, and immune suppres-
sion as potential side effects of liposomes, in: Advances in Clinical Immunology, Medical
Microbiology, COVID-19, Big Data, Jenny Stanford Publishing, Dubai (2021): pp.
55–75.
[29] A. Gabizon, Y. Barenholz, Method for Drug Loading in Liposomes, US 2005/0129753
A1 (2005).
[30] A. Cabanes, S. Even-Chen, J. Zimberoff, Y. Barenholz, E. Kedar, A. Gabizon, Enhance-
ment of antitumor activity of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin with
soluble and liposomal interleukin 21, Clin. Cancer Res. 5 (1999) 687–693.
[31] E. Kedar, Y. Rutkowski, E. Braun, N. Emanuel, Y. Barenholz, Delivery of cytokines by
liposomes. I: Preparation and characterization of interleukin-2 encapsulated in longcirculating sterically stabilized liposomes, J. Immunother. 16 (1994). https://journals.
lww.com/immunotherapy-journal/Fulltext/1994/07000/Delivery_of_Cytokines_by_
Liposomes__I__Preparation.5.aspx.
[32] E. Kedar, E. Braun, Y. Rutkowski, N. Emanuel, Y. Barenholz, Delivery of cytokines by
liposomes. II: Interleukin-2 encapsulated in long-circulating sterically stabilized liposomes: Immunomodulatory and anti-tumor activity in mice, J. Immunother. 16 (1994).
https://journals.lww.com/immunotherapy-journal/Fulltext/1994/08000/Delivery_
of_Cytokines_by_Liposomes__II_.5.aspx.
[33] B. Diop-Frimpong, V.P. Chauhan, S. Krane, Y. Boucher, R.K. Jain, Losartan inhibits col-
lagen I synthesis and improves the distribution and efcacy of nanotherapeutics in tumors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 (2011) 2909–2914. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018892108.
[34] A.-M.C. Yvon, P. Wadsworth, M.A. Jordan, Taxol suppresses dynamics of individ-
ual microtubules in living human tumor cells, Mol. Biol. Cell. 10 (1999) 947–959.
doi:10.1091/mbc.10.4.947.
[35] R. Pazdur, A.P. Kudelka, J.J. Kavanagh, P.R. Cohen, M.N. Raber, The taxoids: Pacl-
itaxel (Taxol®) and docetaxel (Taxotere®), Cancer Treat. Rev. 19 (1993) 351–386.
doi:10.1016/0305-7372(93)90010-O.

322 Carbon-Based Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery
[36] S.Y. Song, K. Kim, S.-Y. Jeong, J. Park, J. Park, J. Jung, H.K. Chung, S.-W. Lee,
M.H. Seo, J. Lee, K.H. Jung, E.K. Choi, Polymeric nanoparticle-docetaxel for the
treatment of advanced solid tumors: Phase I clinical trial and preclinical data from an
orthotopic pancreatic cancer model, Oncotarget. 7 (2016) 77348–77357. doi:10.18632/
oncotarget.12668.
[37] B. van Oijen, M. Pleunis, F. Erdkamp, R. Prevoo, H. van der Kuy, Toxic dermatitis in
patients treated with Taxotere® (docetaxel): Three case reports, Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
Ther. 49 (2011) 46–48. doi:10.5414/CPP49046.
[38] J.M. Chan, P.M. Valencia, L. Zhang, R. Langer, O.C. Farokhzad, Polymeric nan-
oparticles for drug delivery, in: S.R. Grobmyer, B.M. Moudgil (Eds.), Cancer Nanotechnology Methods Protocols, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ (2010): pp. 163–175.
doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_11.

Index
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A
ablation 4, 64, 67, 68, 72, 87, 125, 126, 128, 148,
212, 263, 289
acetate 47, 216
acetic 212
Acetobacters 211
acetone 211
acetylation 107, 215
acetylcholine 142, 225, 229
acetylene 68, 72, 125, 126, 130
acid-chitosan-g-poly 83, 208
acrylamide 24, 75, 78, 83, 208
activation-modulated 43, 44, 56
adenocarcinoma 112
adenocarcinomic 266
adenosine 77, 194, 270
aeruginosa 223
AFM 15, 106, 226
A-glycodendrimer 220
alginate-poly-l-lysine-alginate 225
alkyl cyanoacrylates 210
alveolar 266, 274
alveolar-capillary 265
Alzheimer’s 113, 114, 141, 142, 172, 195, 218,
– 227, 229, 290
225
amidoamine 220
amino silane 216
amoxicillin-controlled 213
amperometric 220
anthracyclines 311
antibacterial 8, 51, 75, 212
249, 271, 301
anticancer 8, 20, 21, 82, 84, 107, 109
– 137, 139 – 141, 157, 158, 168, 170, 174,
135
176, 194, 207
255, 258, 293, 294, 296, 303, 311, 312, 316,
319
anticoagulant 80
anti-epcam 113
antifungal 248
antigens 19, 20, 52, 54, 244, 246, 255
antimicrobial 202, 222, 223, 295
antimitotic 297
anti-neoplastic 297
antioxidant 3, 85, 112, 186, 194, 195
antitumor 112, 170, 278, 312, 317
aptamers 20, 44, 53, 111, 116, 175
arginine-glycine-aspartic 209
asialoglycoprotein 296
atherosclerosis 194
– 276
– 214, 220, 222, 248,
– 112, 116,
– 211, 218, 224, 225, 229, 247,
aziridine 72, 73
azomethine 72
B
Bacillus 301
bacteria 194, 203, 211
279, 301, 304, 311
bacteriophage-based 295
bacteriophages 295, 296, 304
basidiomycetes 223
basophils 3, 186
BBB 21, 54, 141, 157, 170, 227, 289
benzene 11, 61, 62, 132, 164, 184, 188
betaxololchlorhydrate 210
betulinic 294
bienzymatic 219
bilayer 50, 68, 195, 215, 266, 312
bimetallic 218
bioaccumulation 291
bioadhesion 254
bio-adsorbent 24
biocatalysts 204, 219
bioengineering 220, 221, 297
biofunctionalized 2, 12, 71
bioimaging 2, 7, 8, 13, 20, 52, 98, 104, 123, 137,
138, 156, 166, 168, 175, 206, 207, 264, 297, 303
biomarker 20, 146
biopolymer 164, 229
bio-responsive 44
biosensing 2, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 52, 63, 98, 123, 137,
166, 206, 264, 299
138,
biosensor 21, 79, 220
bisphenol 219
bis-phosphonate 112
blood-brain barrier 21, 54, 114, 141, 157, 170,
193, 194, 227, 265, 289, 303
blood-cerebrospinal 289
blood-retinal 292
borohydride 105, 213
boron-doped 271
BRB 142, 292
bromophenyl 75
bronchoalveolar 275
Buckyballs 184, 185
Buckysomes 193
, 214, 222, 223, 248, 251,
– 291
– 190, 220
C
Caenorhabditis 269, 272
calcitonin 253
323

324 Index
camptothecin 107, 111, 294
cancerous 20, 21, 54, 80, 82, 111, 139, 291, 314
caprolactone 213
carbene 72, 74
carbodiimide 107
carboxybetaine 249
carboxylic 55, 63, 77, 107, 108, 133, 134, 172,
191, 205, 225, 249
carboxymethyl 170
carcinogenic 84, 205, 279
cardiomyocytes 87, 144, 146
catalyst 6, 69, 79, 125, 126, 128
catalyst-assisted 123
cellulose 47, 78, 140, 160, 170, 202, 203, 211,
213, 214, 221, 222, 229
ceramic 202, 221
cerebral 142, 225, 229, 247
cervical 139, 257, 269
chelerythrine 294
chemo-gene-photothermal 84
chemo-immunotherapy 316
chemo-photothermal 84, 110
chemotherapeutic 54, 80, 82, 86, 110, 116, 140,
168, 170, 174, 176, 207, 208, 223, 224, 257,
296, 311, 316, 317
chirality 5, 9, 123, 124, 129
chitosan 14, 21, 78, 99, 107,
140, 146, 164, 170, 202, 203, 206, 208, 209,
– 214, 229, 250, 253, 294
212
chlorophenyl-functionalized 75
chloroquine 84
cholesterol 50, 226, 292, 312
cholinergic 225
cholinesterase 226
CMC 170, 213
CMF 211
CNC 211, 212
CNF 211, 212
CNM 288, 289, 294
CNOs 290, 291
CNS 9, 26, 141, 148, 193, 216, 227
CNT 9, 16, 22, 125, 130
148, 174, 204, 205, 219, 220, 254, 267
CNT-dendrimer 220
CNT-GelMA 146
CNT-PAMAM 219
CNT-polymer 135
collagen 144, 209, 221, 316
colloidal 12, 20, 52
156, 162, 213, 248, 264, 278
colon 112, 139, 140, 216, 225, 251, 254, 258, 259, 319
contaminants 23
– 132, 163, 166
130
contraceptive 210
cortical 195, 226
CPMV 295, 297
CQDs 4, 5, 24, 26, 273, 294
CSP 24
– 54, 63, 72, 135, 140, 141,
– 26, 67, 71, 102, 125, 128,
– 131, 135, 298
109, 110, 113,
– 133, 135 – 137, 144 – 146,
CVD 14, 64, 68
164, 187
cyanoacrylate 210, 227
cyanoacrylate-co-hexadecyl 210
cyclodextrin–fullerene 199
cyclodextrins 191
cyclohexane-chloroform 210
cytidine 77
cytocompatibility 175
cytoskeleton 265, 267
cytosols 21, 54, 170
cytotoxic 112, 140, 166, 216, 267, 270, 297, 316
– 71, 87, 124 – 126, 130, 148,
D
daunorubicin 209, 311
DaunoXome 209
DCA 258
DCC 107
DDS 21, 39, 41
106, 107, 112, 115, 137, 140, 141, 170, 201,
207, 244
DEAP-Lys 290
dehydrogenase 21, 140, 141, 220, 258, 270
delamination 211
dendrimer 51, 215
dendrimer-carbon-nanotube 219
Dendrimer-grafted 216, 217
dendrimer-NP 217, 218
dendrimer-QD 218, 219
D-enzyme 79
dexamethasone 83
dextroamphetamine 42
DFT 25
diabetes 227
diacetate-acetoxymethyl 266
diaminobutane-based 219
diaminotriethylene 225
diamond-based 15
diazirine 74
diazobenzene 108
diazonium 74, 75, 108
dichlorocarbene 74
Diels-Alder 191
dienophiles 72
diffusion-controlled 46, 47
dimethylaminoethyl 250
dimethyl-imidazolidinone 5
dioxide 23, 24, 70, 256
dipalmitoylphosphati-dylcholine 110
dipole-induced 300
DME 293
DMEU 5
DMF 72, 74, 75, 163
DMSO 111, 112
DNA-functionalized 78
docetaxel 82, 316, 317
DOCETAXEL-PNP 316
– 44, 46, 47, 56, 80, 81, 83, 84,
– 249, 251 – 253
– 220, 252, 292

325 Index
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
donepezil 142, 227
DOX 21, 54, 82
157, 158, 168, 170, 175, 208, 216, 224, 229,
258, 294, 296, 299, 311
DOX-GO 208
DOX-GQD-FA 157
Doxil 209, 224, 311
doxorubicin 21, 54, 82, 107, 112, 139, 157, 168, 193,
209
doxorubicin-methano-C 193
DP 209, 210
DPPC 110
drug-carrying 210
drug-loading 12, 48, 63, 140, 141
drug-polymer 210
drug-release 141, 208
drug-resistance-related 258
DSNPs 217
DTX 316, 317
dual-polymer-GO 113
dual-responsive 84, 96
– 84, 107, 109, 110, 112, 139, 140,
– 317, 319
– 317, 319
– 211, 216, 224, 229, 258, 290, 294, 311 – 314
E
EBI 165
ECM 86
EDA 24
edge-functionalized 75, 156, 159
EDX 15, 16, 106
EGF 224, 255
EGFP 112
electrical-responsive 87
electrochemical 5, 8, 9, 64
electrode 65, 77, 128, 160, 218
electrospun 146, 214, 251
embryonic 15, 21, 86, 139
emulsion 209, 227, 228, 252, 253
encapsulated 35, 74, 79, 83, 113, 175, 215, 218,
endocrine 23
endogenous 194, 244, 259
endosomes 211, 219, 302
enzymatic 2, 4, 45, 85, 186, 211, 220, 223, 225
enzyme-powered 299
epilepsy 289
epirubicin 311
epitaxial 64, 75, 204
epithelium 251,
epoxide 11, 62, 204, 263
epoxy 13, 16, 18, 52, 65, 72, 81, 98, 99, 106,
erythrodysesthesia 315
erythromycin 221
Ethylenediamine 24
ethylenimine 85, 250
exfoliation 18, 64
exogenous 86, 194, 259, 316
– 161, 177, 178, 190, 212, 219, 231
141, 158
220, 248, 253, 255, 317
267, 292
156, 205
– 67, 75, 100, 101, 104, 159, 204, 271
– 67, 77, 93, 104,
extracts 41, 212
Ezema 87
– 214, 222, 229, 270, 273
F
FA 14, 20, 21, 53, 54, 83, 84, 107, 108, 110, 139,
208
FA-conjugated 84
FAM-ssDNA 299
FBRs 126
FCCD 142
f-CNTs 144
FDA 48, 49, 210, 286, 303, 311, 312, 317
feces 273, 275
femoral 22, 144
Fenton 256, 257
ferritin 168
ferromagnetic 291
Fibrillar 211
Field-induced 307
Fluorescence 138, 179
Fluorinated-dendrimer 219
FNDs 15
fullerene 2
fullerenols 191, 194, 195, 278
fullerosomes 4, 187
– 4, 11, 24, 25, 52, 61, 182, 204, 220,
– 279, 288, 291
264, 273
G
GA 82, 85, 114
gadofullerenes 4, 187
gadolinium 4, 187, 301
GaInSn 300
Galactosamine 209
Galactose 290
galantamine 142
galectin 296
gallium-apatite 223
gastrointestinal 40, 42, 44, 225, 228, 229, 245,
251, 253, 316
gastro-retentive 251
G-band 17
GBN 12, 63, 264
GBNs 11, 12, 62, 63, 263
GCE 113
Gd-MSN 301
gelatin 22, 144, 146, 209, 214
gelatin-alginate 85, 114
gene-chemo 84
gene-gun-impregnated 172
genetic 84, 111
genome 112, 294
genotoxic 278, 279
GLDH-Pt-PAMAM 220
glial 114
glioblastoma 194, 219, 266, 289
glomerulonephritis 228
, 112, 141, 215, 221, 227, 228, 248, 294
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
