Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1316_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
However, outside of the scope of the [Freedom of Information Act] and on a discretionary
basis, the following information has been advised to us, which may be of interest. Most
infectious diseases are caused by viruses, bacteria or fungi. Some bacteria or fungi have the
capacity to grow on their own in isolation, for example in colonies on a petri dish. Viruses are
different in that they are what we call ‘obligate pathogens’ – that is, they cannot survive or
reproduce without infecting a host ...
… For some diseases, it is possible to establish causation between a microorganism and a
disease by isolating the pathogen from a patient, growing it in pure culture and reintroducing
it to a healthy organism. These are known as ‘Koch’s postulates’ and were developed in 1882.
However, as our understanding of disease and different disease-causing agents has advanced,
these are no longer the method for determining causation [Andrew Kaufman asks why in that
case are there two published articles falsely claiming to satisfy Koch’s postulates].
It has long been known that viral diseases cannot be identified in this way as viruses cannot
be grown in ‘pure culture’. When a patient is tested for a viral illness, this is normally done by
looking for the presence of antigens, or viral genetic code in a host with molecular biology
techniques [Kaufman asks how you could know the origin of these chemicals without having
a pure culture for comparison].
For the record ‘antigens’ are defined so:
Invading microorganisms have antigens on their surface that the human body can recognise as
being foreign – meaning not belonging to it. When the body recognises a foreign antigen,
lymphocytes (white blood cells) produce antibodies, which are complementary in shape to
the antigen.
Notwithstanding that this is open to question in relation to ‘SARSCov-2’ the presence of ‘antibodies’ can have many causes and they
are found in people that are perfectly well. Kary Mullis said:
‘Antibodies … had always been considered evidence of past disease,
not present disease.’
‘Covid’ really is a
computer
‘virus’
Where the UK Department of Health statement says ‘viruses’ are
now ‘diagnosed’ through a ‘viral genetic code in a host with
molecular biology techniques’, they mean … the PCR test which its
inventor said cannot test for infectious disease. They have no
credible method of connecting a ‘virus’ to a disease and we will see
that there is no scientific proof that any ‘virus’ causes any disease or
there is any such thing as a ‘virus’ in the way that it is described.
Tenacious Canadian researcher Christine Massey and her team made
some 40 Freedom of Information requests to national public health
agencies in different countries asking for proof that SARS-CoV-2 has
been isolated and not one of them could supply that information.
Massey said of her request in Canada: ‘Freedom of Information
reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of ‘SARSCOV-2’ isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.’ If you
accept the comment from the UK Department of Health it’s because
they can’t isolate a ‘virus’. Even so many ‘science’ papers claimed to
have isolated the ‘Covid virus’ until they were questioned and had
to admit they hadn’t. A reply from the Robert Koch Institute in
Germany was typical: ‘I am not aware of a paper which purified
isolated SARS-CoV-2.’ So what the hell was Christian Drosten and
his gang using to design the ‘Covid’ testing protocol that has
produced all the illusory Covid’ cases and ‘Covid’ deaths when the
head of the Chinese version of the CDC admied there was a
problem right from the start in that the ‘virus’ had never been
isolated/purified? Breathe deeply: What they are calling ‘Covid’ is
actually created by a computer program i.e. they made it up – er, that’s
it. They took lung fluid, with many sources of genetic material, from
one single person alleged to be infected with Covid-19 by a PCR test
which they claimed, without clear evidence, contained a ‘virus’. They
used several computer programs to create a model of a theoretical
virus genome sequence from more than fiy-six million small
sequences of RNA, each of an unknown source, assembling them
like a puzzle with no known solution. The computer filled in the
gaps with sequences from bits in the gene bank to make it look like a
bat SARS-like coronavirus! A wave of the magic wand and poof, an
in silico (computer-generated) genome, a scientific fantasy, was
created. UK health researcher Dr Kevin Corbe made the same point
with this analogy:
… It’s like giving you a few bones and saying that’s your fish. It could be any fish. Not even a
skeleton. Here’s a few fragments of bones. That’s your fish … It’s all from gene bank and the
bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That’s what genetics is; it’s a code. So it’s
ABBBCCDDD and you’re missing some what you think is EEE so you put it in. It’s all
synthetic. You just manufacture the bits that are missing. This is the end result of the
geneticization of virology. This is basically a computer virus.
Further confirmation came in an email exchange between British
citizen journalist Frances Leader and the government’s Medicines &
Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (the Gates-funded MHRA)
which gave emergency permission for untested ‘Covid vaccines’ to
be used. The agency admied that the ‘vaccine’ is not based on an
isolated ‘virus’, but comes from a computer-generated model. Frances
Leader was naturally banned from Cult-owned fascist Twier for
making this exchange public. The process of creating computergenerated alleged ‘viruses’ is called ‘in silico’ or ‘in silicon’ –
computer chips – and the term ‘in silico’ is believed to originate with
biological experiments using only a computer in 1989. ‘Vaccines’
involved with ‘Covid’ are also produced ‘in silico’ or by computer
not a natural process. If the original ‘virus’ is nothing more than a
made-up computer model how can there be ‘new variants’ of
something that never existed in the first place? They are not new
‘variants’; they are new computer models only minutely different to
the original program and designed to further terrify the population
into having the ‘vaccine’ and submiing to fascism. You want a ‘new
variant’? Click, click, enter – there you go. Tell the medical
profession that you have discovered a ‘South African variant’, ‘UK
variants’ or a ‘Brazilian variant’ and in the usual HIV-causes-AIDS
manner they will unquestioningly repeat it with no evidence
whatsoever to support these claims. They will go on television and
warn about the dangers of ‘new variants’ while doing nothing more
than repeating what they have been told to be true and knowing that
any deviation from that would be career suicide. Big-time insiders
will know it’s a hoax, but much of the medical community is clueless
about the way they are being played and themselves play the public
without even being aware they are doing so. What an interesting
‘coincidence’ that AstraZeneca and Oxford University were
conducting ‘Covid vaccine trials’ in the three countries – the UK,
South Africa and Brazil – where the first three ‘variants’ were
claimed to have ‘broken out’.
Here’s your ‘virus’ – it’s a unicorn
Dr Andrew Kaufman presented a brilliant analysis describing how
the ‘virus’ was imagined into fake existence when he dissected an
article published by Nature and wrien by 19 authors detailing
alleged ‘sequencing of a complete viral genome’ of the ‘new SARSCoV-2 virus’. This computer-modelled in silico genome was used as a
template for all subsequent genome sequencing experiments that
resulted in the so-called variants which he said now number more
than 6,000. The fake genome was constructed from more than 56
million individual short strands of RNA. Those lile pieces were
assembled into longer pieces by finding areas of overlapping
sequences. The computer programs created over two million
possible combinations from which the authors simply chose the
longest one. They then compared this to a ‘bat virus’ and the
computer ‘alignment’ rearranged the sequence and filled in the gaps!
They called this computer-generated abomination the ‘complete
genome’. Dr Tom Cowan, a fellow medical author and collaborator
with Kaufman, said such computer-generation constitutes scientific
fraud and he makes this superb analogy:
Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they
found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that
information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this
computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so
could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the
actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus’,
sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of
the imaginary ‘unicorn’, so they come together as a group and decide which is the real
imaginary unicorn.
This is how the ‘virus’ that has transformed the world was brought
into fraudulent ‘existence’. Extraordinary, yes, but as the Nazis said
the bigger the lie the more will believe it. Cowan, however, wasn’t
finished and he went on to identify what he called the real
blockbuster in the paper. He quotes this section from a paper wrien
by virologists and published by the CDC and then explains what it
means:
Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several
common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549),
human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to
Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. ... Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of
infection and examined 24h post-infection.
No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than
10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only
modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.
Cowan explains that when virologists aempt to prove infection
they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test.
The first was humans. Exposure to humans was generally not done
for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any
coronavirus. The second possible host was animals. Cowan said that
forgeing for a moment that they never actually use purified virus
when exposing animals they do use solutions that they claim contain
the virus. Exposure to animals has been done with SARS-CoV-2 in
an experiment involving mice and this is what they found: None of
the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically-modified
mice, a statistically insignificant number lost weight and had slightly
bristled fur, but they experienced nothing like the illness called
‘Covid-19’. Cowan said the third method – the one they mostly rely
on – is to inoculate solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety
of tissue cultures. This process had never been shown to kill tissue
unless the sample material was starved of nutrients and poisoned as
part of the process. Yes, incredibly, in tissue experiments designed to
show the ‘virus’ is responsible for killing the tissue they starve the
tissue of nutrients and add toxic drugs including antibiotics and they
do not have control studies to see if it’s the starvation and poisoning
that is degrading the tissue rather than the ‘virus’ they allege to be in
there somewhere. You want me to pinch you? Yep, I understand.
Tom Cowan said this about the whole nonsensical farce as he
explains what that quote from the CDC paper really means:
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists
found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 – even in high amounts – were NOT, I repeat
NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this
means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human
beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent
drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a
clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is harmless to human beings.
That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in
their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero
cells, thanks for coming.
Cowan concluded: ‘If people really understood how this “science”
was done, I would hope they would storm the gates and demand
honesty, transparency and truth.’ Dr Michael Yeadon, former Vice
President and Chief Scientific Adviser at drug giant Pfizer has been a
vocal critic of the ‘Covid vaccine’ and its potential for multiple harm.
He said in an interview in April, 2021, that ‘not one [vaccine] has the
virus. He was asked why vaccines normally using a ‘dead’ version of
a disease to activate the immune system were not used for ‘Covid’
and instead we had the synthetic methods of the ‘mRNA Covid
vaccine’. Yeadon said that to do the former ‘you’d have to have some
of [the virus] wouldn’t you?’ He added: ‘No-one’s got any –
seriously.’ Yeadon said that surely they couldn’t have fooled the
whole world for a year without having a virus, ‘but oddly enough
ask around – no one’s got it’. He didn’t know why with all the ‘great
labs’ around the world that the virus had not been isolated – ‘Maybe
they’ve been too busy running bad PCR tests and vaccines that
people don’t need.’ What is today called ‘science’ is not ‘science’ at
all. Science is no longer what is, but whatever people can be
manipulated to believe that it is. Real science has been hijacked by the
Cult to dispense and produce the ‘expert scientists’ and contentions
that suit the agenda of the Cult. How big-time this has happened
with the ‘Covid’ hoax which is entirely based on fake science
delivered by fake ‘scientists’ and fake ‘doctors’. The human-caused
climate change hoax is also entirely based on fake science delivered
by fake ‘scientists’ and fake ‘climate experts’. In both cases real
scientists, climate experts and doctors have their views suppressed
and deleted by the Cult-owned science establishment, media and
Silicon Valley. This is the ‘science’ that politicians claim to be
‘following’ and a common denominator of ‘Covid’ and climate are
Cult psychopaths Bill Gates and his mate Klaus Schwab at the Gatesfunded World Economic Forum. But, don’t worry, it’s all just a
coincidence and absolutely nothing to worry about. Zzzzzzzz.
What is a ‘virus’ REALLY?
Dr Tom Cowan is one of many contesting the very existence of
viruses let alone that they cause disease. This is understandable
when there is no scientific evidence for a disease-causing ‘virus’.
German virologist Dr Stefan Lanka won a landmark case in 2017 in
the German Supreme Court over his contention that there is no such
thing as a measles virus. He had offered a big prize for anyone who
could prove there is and Lanka won his case when someone sought
to claim the money. There is currently a prize of more than 225,000
euros on offer from an Isolate Truth Fund for anyone who can prove
the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 and its genetic substance. Lanka wrote
in an article headed ‘The Misconception Called Virus’ that scientists
think a ‘virus’ is causing tissue to become diseased and degraded
when in fact it is the processes they are using which do that – not a
‘virus’. Lanka has done an important job in making this point clear
as Cowan did in his analysis of the CDC paper. Lanka says that all
claims about viruses as disease-causing pathogens are wrong and
based on ‘easily recognisable, understandable and verifiable
misinterpretations.’ Scientists believed they were working with
‘viruses’ in their laboratories when they were really working with
‘typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells …’ Lanka said that
the tissue decaying process claimed to be caused by a ‘virus’ still
happens when no alleged ‘virus’ is involved. It’s the process that does
the damage and not a ‘virus’. The genetic sample is deprived of
nutrients, removed from its energy supply through removal from
the body and then doused in toxic antibiotics to remove any bacteria.
He confirms again that establishment scientists do not (pinch me)
conduct control experiments to see if this is the case and if they did
they would see the claims that ‘viruses’ are doing the damage is
nonsense. He adds that during the measles ‘virus’ court case he
commissioned an independent laboratory to perform just such a
control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells died
in the exact same way as with alleged ‘infected’ material. This is
supported by a gathering number of scientists, doctors and
researchers who reject what is called ‘germ theory’ or the belief in
the body being infected by contagious sources emied by other
people. Researchers Dawn Lester and David Parker take the same
stance in their highly-detailed and sourced book What Really Makes
You Ill – Why everything you thought you knew about disease is wrong
which was recommended to me by a number of medical
professionals genuinely seeking the truth. Lester and Parker say
there is no provable scientific evidence to show that a ‘virus’ can be
transmied between people or people and animals or animals and
people:
The definition also claims that viruses are the cause of many diseases, as if this has been
definitively proven. But this is not the case; there is no original scientific evidence that
definitively demonstrates that any virus is the cause of any disease. The burden of proof for
any theory lies with those who proposed it; but none of the existing documents provides
‘proof’ that supports the claim that ‘viruses’ are pathogens.
Dr Tom Cowan employs one of his clever analogies to describe the
process by which a ‘virus’ is named as the culprit for a disease when
what is called a ‘virus’ is only material released by cells detoxing
themselves from infiltration by chemical or radiation poisoning. The
tidal wave of technologically-generated radiation in the ‘smart’
modern world plus all the toxic food and drink are causing this to
happen more than ever. Deluded ‘scientists’ misread this as a
gathering impact of what they wrongly label ‘viruses’.
Paper can infect houses
Cowan said in an article for davidicke.com – with his tongue only
mildly in his cheek – that he believed he had made a tremendous
discovery that may revolutionise science. He had discovered that
small bits of paper are alive, ‘well alive-ish’, can ‘infect’ houses, and
then reproduce themselves inside the house. The result was that this
explosion of growth in the paper inside the house causes the house
to explode, blowing it to smithereens. His evidence for this new
theory is that in the past months he had carefully examined many of
the houses in his neighbourhood and found almost no scraps of
paper on the lawns and surrounds of the house. There was an
occasional stray label, but nothing more. Then he would return to
these same houses a week or so later and with a few, not all of them,
particularly the old and decrepit ones, he found to his shock and
surprise they were liered with stray bits of paper. He knew then
that the paper had infected these houses, made copies of itself, and
blew up the house. A young boy on a bicycle at one of the sites told
him he had seen a demolition crew using dynamite to explode the
house the previous week, but Cowan dismissed this as the idle
thoughts of silly boys because ‘I was on to something big’. He was
on to how ‘scientists’ mistake genetic material in the detoxifying
process for something they call a ‘virus’. Cowan said of his house
and paper story:
If this sounds crazy to you, it’s because it should. This scenario is obviously nuts. But consider
this admittedly embellished, for effect, current viral theory that all scientists, medical doctors
and virologists currently believe.
He takes the example of the ‘novel SARS-Cov2’ virus to prove the
point. First they take someone with an undefined illness called
‘Covid-19’ and don’t even aempt to find any virus in their sputum.
Never mind the scientists still describe how this ‘virus’, which they
have not located aaches to a cell receptor, injects its genetic
material, in ‘Covid’s’ case, RNA, into the cell. The RNA once inserted
exploits the cell to reproduce itself and makes ‘thousands, nay
millions, of copies of itself … Then it emerges victorious to claim its
next victim’:
If you were to look in the scientific literature for proof, actual scientific proof, that uniform
SARS-CoV2 viruses have been properly isolated from the sputum of a sick person, that actual
spike proteins could be seen protruding from the virus (which has not been found), you would
find that such evidence doesn’t exist.
If you go looking in the published scientific literature for actual pictures, proof, that these
spike proteins or any viral proteins are ever attached to any receptor embedded in any cell
membrane, you would also find that no such evidence exists. If you were to look for a video
or documented evidence of the intact virus injecting its genetic material into the body of the
cell, reproducing itself and then emerging victorious by budding off the cell membrane, you
would find that no such evidence exists.
The closest thing you would find is electron micrograph pictures of cellular particles, possibly
attached to cell debris, both of which to be seen were stained by heavy metals, a process that
completely distorts their architecture within the living organism. This is like finding bits of
paper stuck to the blown-up bricks, thereby proving the paper emerged by taking pieces of the
bricks on its way out.
The Enders baloney
Cowan describes the ‘Covid’ story as being just as make-believe as
his paper story and he charts back this fantasy to a Nobel Prize
winner called John Enders (1897-1985), an American biomedical
scientist who has been dubbed ‘The Father of Modern Vaccines’.
Enders is claimed to have ‘discovered’ the process of the viral
culture which ‘proved’ that a ‘virus’ caused measles. Cowan
explains how Enders did this ‘by using the EXACT same procedure
that has been followed by every virologist to find and characterize
every new virus since 1954’. Enders took throat swabs from children
with measles and immersed them in 2ml of milk. Penicillin (100u/ml)
and the antibiotic streptomycin (50,g/ml) were added and the whole
mix was centrifuged – rotated at high speed to separate large cellular
debris from small particles and molecules as with milk and cream,
for example. Cowan says that if the aim is to find lile particles of
genetic material (‘viruses’) in the snot from children with measles it
would seem that the last thing you would do is mix the snot with
other material – milk –that also has genetic material. ‘How are you
ever going to know whether whatever you found came from the snot
or the milk?’ He points out that streptomycin is a ‘nephrotoxic’ or
poisonous-to-the-kidney drug. You will see the relevance of that