Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1316_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Acknowledgements
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Recognition of the Sick Patient
- •Shock and Organ Perfusion
- •Outcomes of Resuscitation
- •Investigations
- •Fluid and Electrolyte Replacement
- •Haematological Therapy
- •Coagulopathy
- •Antibiotics
- •Emergency Laparoscopic Surgery
- •Approach to Traumatic Abdominal Pain
- •Ancillary Investigations in the ED
- •Indications for Referral
- •References
- •Risk Factors for Surgery
- •Postoperative Care
- •Intensive Care/High Dependency
- •Sepsis Syndromes
- •Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)
- •Blood transfusion and blood component therapy
- •Postoperative Oliguria
- •Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)
- •Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS)
- •Nutrition
- •Pros and cons of TPN
- •Introduction
- •Initial Management
- •Rockall score
- •Glasgow–Blatchford score
- •Medical Therapy
- •Endoscopic Therapy
- •Timing of endoscopy
- •Epinephrine injection
- •Thermal therapy
- •Argon plasma coagulation
- •Endoscopic clipping
- •Failure of endoscopic therapy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Management of Variceal Bleeding
- •Medical Management and Resuscitation
- •Endoscopic Management
- •Variceal band ligation
- •Cyanoacrylate glue
- •Endoscopic sclerotherapy
- •Subsequent endoscopy
- •Portosystemic shunts: TIPS and surgery
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Management Options
- •Catheter Angiography
- •CT Angiography
- •Embolic Agents
- •Complications of Angiography
- •Indirect Bleeding
- •References
- •I. Indications
- •II. Preoperative Preparation
- •B. Over-Sewing a Bleeding Ulcer
- •Pyloroplasty/gastroenterostomy
- •Truncal vagotomy
- •Ensure safe duodenal stump closure
- •Dealing with problems related to the posterior duodenal ulcer penetratinginto the pancreas
- •Mobilisation of distal stomach
- •Billroth II gastroenteral anastomosis
- •Surgical Techniques for BleedingGastric Ulcer
- •F. Local Excision of Gastric Ulcer
- •Key Points in Billroth I Gastrectomyfor Bleeding Gastric Ulcer
- •Incisional wound closure
- •Postoperative care
- •References
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Preparation
- •Operative Treatment
- •A. Benign Duodenal Ulcer Perforation
- •B. Benign Gastric Ulcer Perforations
- •References
- •2. Preoperative Preparation
- •3. Surgery
- •Open Appendectomy
- •Introduction
- •General Complications
- •Thromboembolism
- •Atelectasis
- •Nausea and Vomiting
- •Wound Complications
- •Acute Abdominal Complications
- •1. Bleeding
- •2. Leaks
- •Treatment options for GJ leak
- •Managing sleeve leak
- •3. Stenosis and Stricture
- •4. Gastric Band Slippage and IntestinalObstruction
- •5. Other Complications
- •Gastric banding
- •Gastric bypass
- •Nutritional problems
- •1. Indications
- •Operative Strategy of Acute Appendicitis
- •Laparoscopic Appendectomy
- •4. Postoperative care
- •Special Situations
- •Introduction
- •Management of Acute Sigmoid Colonic Diverticulitis
- •A. Preoperative Management
- •B. Indications for Surgery
- •C. Options of Surgical Procedure
- •Two-stage approach
- •Single-stage approach
- •Role of laparoscopic surgery in acute perforative sigmoid colonic diverticulitis
- •E. Position of Patient for Surgery
- •Intra-Operative Surgical Techniques
- •A. Incision and Laparotomy
- •Tips and tricks to help locate the ‘difficult’ left ureter
- •Common sites of left ureteric injury during anterior resection
- •D. Splenic Flexure Take Down
- •Tips and tricks to tackle difficultsplenic flexure
- •E. Vascular Control
- •Ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA)
- •How to identify the IMA?
- •On-table colonic lavage
- •When is it not safe to anastomose?
- •J. Completion of Surgery
- •K. Postoperation Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •I. Preoperative Management
- •II. Management Options
- •III. Endoscopic Colonic Stenting
- •Indications
- •IV. Defunctioning Stoma
- •Indications
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •References
- •Definition
- •Risk Factors for DifficultLaparoscopic Cholecystectomyin Acute Cholecystitis
- •Preoperative preparation
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Laparoscopic approach
- •References
- •Pre- ERCP Preparation
- •ERCP for Choledocholithiasis
- •ERCP in Bile Duct Injuries
- •Difficult Biliary Cannulation
- •Post- ERCP Care
- •References
- •A) Acute Cholangitis
- •C) Bile Duct Injuries During Surgery
- •D) Pancreatic Trauma
- •E) ERCP Perforation
- •I. Introduction
- •IV. Postoperative Management
- •Special situations
- •Final Note
- •Introduction
- •Disadvantages of Radiological Drainage
- •Radiological Evaluation of the Abscess
- •1) Diagnosis of Abscess
- •2) Identify a Potential Cause for an Abscess
- •3) Determine Drainability of an Abscess
- •4) Identifying the Complications from an Abscess
- •5) Aid Drainage Planning
- •Role of RadiologicalIntervention
- •Contraindications
- •Technique
- •Imaging Guidance
- •Insertion of the Drain
- •Drainage Catheter
- •Site Specific Comments on Radiological Drainage of Intra-Abdominal Abscess
- •Liver Abscess
- •Subphrenic and Lesser Sac Abscess
- •Percutaneous Cholecystostomy
- •Pancreatic Collection/Abscess
- •Pelvic Abscess
- •Enteric Abscess
- •Others
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •I. Ectopic Pregnancy
- •Operative procedures
- •II. Ruptured Tubo-Ovarian Abscess
- •Preoperative
- •Operative procedures
- •Postoperative
- •III. Haemorrhage or LeakingOvarian Cyst and Adnexal Torsion
- •A. Adnexal torsion
- •Preoperative — Benign Ovarian Cyst
- •Laparoscopic intervention
- •2. Laparoscopic ovarian oophorectomy
- •3. Open Cystectomy
- •Introduction
- •Repair of Bladder Injuries
- •Boari Flap
- •Other Manoeuvres
- •Post-Operative Care
- •Conclusion
- •II. Perioperative Care
- •IV. Mycotic Aneurysms
- •VI. Post-Surgery Follow-up
- •I. Introduction and Indications
- •II. Preoperative Management
- •III. OT Preparation
- •IV. Operative Procedure
- •Damage Control Mode
- •Splenic Injuries
- •Bowel Injuries
- •Kidney Injuries
- •Pancreatic Injuries
- •Liver Injuries
- •VI. Postoperative Care
- •V. Wound Closure
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Choice of Surgical Technique
- •Operative Procedure
- •1. Component Separation Technique
- •3. Bilateral Skin Flap Advancement
- •5. Use of Alloplastic Materials
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •Laparotomy
- •Laparoscopy
- •Interventional Radiology
- •Air Enema
- •Neonatal Intestinal Obstruction
- •Duodenal Atresia
- •Duodenoduodenostomy
- •Malrotation with Volvulus
- •Intestinal Atresia
- •Hirschsprung’s Disease (HD)
- •Anorectal Malformations
- •Inguinal Hernia in Children
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Benefits of Laparoscopy in Emergency
- •Indications of Emergency Laparoscopy
- •Instrumentation
- •Instruments for Removal of Specimen
- •Instruments for Port Closure
- •Patient Position and O.T. Setup
- •Suggested Reading
- •Index
- •Uploaded by [StormRG]
- •Contents

vociferously speaking out against the use of his test to detect ‘Covid’
when it was never designed, or able, to do that. I know that to be
true given that Mullis made the same point when his test was used
to ‘detect’ – not detect – HIV. He had been seriously critical of the
Gallo/Montagnier claim to have isolated the HIV ‘virus’ and shown
it to cause AIDS for which Mullis said there was no evidence. AIDS
is actually not a disease but a series of diseases from which people
die all the time. When they die from those same diseases aer a
positive ‘test’ for HIV then AIDS goes on their death certificate. I
think I’ve heard that before somewhere. Countries instigated a
policy with ‘Covid’ that anyone who tested positive with a test not
testing for the ‘virus’ and died of any other cause within 28 days and
even longer ‘Covid-19’ had to go on the death certificate. Cases have
come from the test that can’t test for infectious disease and the
deaths are those who have died of anything aer testing positive
with a test not testing for the ‘virus’. I’ll have much more later about
the death certificate scandal.
Mullis was deeply dismissive of the now US ‘Covid’ star Anthony
Fauci who he said was a liar who didn’t know anything about
anything – ‘and I would say that to his face – nothing.’ He said of
Fauci: ‘The man thinks he can take a blood sample, put it in an
electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it – he
doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand
medicine and shouldn’t be in a position like he’s in.’ That position,
terrifyingly, has made him the decider of ‘Covid’ fascism policy on
behalf of the Cult in his role as director since 1984 of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) while his record
of being wrong is laughable; but being wrong, so long as it’s the right
kind of wrong, is why the Cult loves him. He’ll say anything the Cult
tells him to say. Fauci was made Chief Medical Adviser to the
President immediately Biden took office. Biden was installed in the
White House by Cult manipulation and one of his first decisions was
to elevate Fauci to a position of even more control. This is a
coincidence? Yes, and I identify as a flamenco dancer called Lola.
How does such an incompetent criminal like Fauci remain in that

pivotal position in American health since the 1980s? When you serve
the Cult it looks aer you until you are surplus to requirements.
Kary Mullis said prophetically of Fauci and his like: ‘Those guys
have an agenda and it’s not an agenda we would like them to have
… they make their own rules, they change them when they want to,
and Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the
people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.’ Fauci has
done that almost daily since the ‘Covid’ hoax began. Lying is in
Fauci’s DNA. To make the situation crystal clear about the PCR test
this is a direct quote from its inventor Kary Mullis:
It [the PCR test] doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended
up with was really going to hurt you ...’
Ask yourself why governments and medical systems the world over
have been using this very test to decide who is ‘infected’ with the
SARS-CoV-2 ‘virus’ and the alleged disease it allegedly causes,
‘Covid-19’. The answer to that question will tell you what has been
going on. By the way, here’s a lile show-stopper – the ‘new’ SARS-
CoV-2 ‘virus’ was ‘identified’ as such right from the start using … the
PCR test not testing for the ‘virus’. If you are new to this and find that
shocking then stick around. I have hardly started yet. Even worse,
other ‘tests’, like the ‘Lateral Flow Device’ (LFD), are considered so
useless that they have to be confirmed by the PCR test! Leaked emails
wrien by Ben Dyson, adviser to UK ‘Health’ Secretary Ma
Hancock, said they were ‘dangerously unreliable’. Dyson, executive
director of strategy at the Department of Health, wrote: ‘As of today,
someone who gets a positive LFD result in (say) London has at best a
25 per cent chance of it being a true positive, but if it is a selfreported test potentially as low as 10 per cent (on an optimistic
assumption about specificity) or as low as 2 per cent (on a more
pessimistic assumption).’ These are the ‘tests’ that schoolchildren
and the public are being urged to have twice a week or more and
have to isolate if they get a positive. Each fake positive goes in the
statistics as a ‘case’ no maer how ludicrously inaccurate and the

‘cases’ drive lockdown, masks and the pressure to ‘vaccinate’. The
government said in response to the email leak that the ‘tests’ were
accurate which confirmed yet again what shocking bloody liars they
are. The real false positive rate is 100 percent as we’ll see. In another
‘you couldn’t make it up’ the UK government agreed to pay £2.8
billion to California’s Innova Medical Group to supply the irrelevant
lateral flow tests. The company’s primary test-making centre is in
China. Innova Medical Group, established in March, 2020, is owned
by Pasaca Capital Inc, chaired by Chinese-American millionaire
Charles Huang who was born in Wuhan.
How it works – and how it doesn’t
The RT-PCR test, known by its full title of Polymerase chain reaction,
is used across the world to make millions, even billions, of copies of
a DNA/RNA genetic information sample. The process is called
‘amplification’ and means that a tiny sample of genetic material is
amplified to bring out the detailed content. I stress that it is not
testing for an infectious disease. It is simply amplifying a sample of
genetic material. In the words of Kary Mullis: ‘PCR is … just a
process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of
something.’ To emphasise the point companies that make the PCR
tests circulated around the world to ‘test’ for ‘Covid’ warn on the
box that it can’t be used to detect ‘Covid’ or infectious disease and is
for research purposes only. It’s okay, rest for a minute and you’ll be
fine. This is the test that produces the ‘cases’ and ‘deaths’ that have
been used to destroy human society. All those global and national
medical and scientific ‘experts’ demanding this destruction to ‘save
us’ KNOW that the test is not testing for the ‘virus’ and the cases and
deaths they claim to be real are an almost unimaginable fraud. Every
one of them and so many others including politicians and
psychopaths like Gates and Tedros must be brought before
Nuremburg-type trials and jailed for the rest of their lives. The more
the genetic sample is amplified by PCR the more elements of that
material become sensitive to the test and by that I don’t mean
sensitive for a ‘virus’ but for elements of the genetic material which

is naturally in the body or relates to remnants of old conditions of
various kinds lying dormant and causing no disease. Once the
amplification of the PCR reaches a certain level everyone will test
positive. So much of the material has been made sensitive to the test
that everyone will have some part of it in their body. Even lying
criminals like Fauci have said that once PCR amplifications pass 35
cycles everything will be a false positive that cannot be trusted for
the reasons I have described. I say, like many proper doctors and
scientists, that 100 percent of the ‘positives’ are false, but let’s just go
with Fauci for a moment.
He says that any amplification over 35 cycles will produce false
positives and yet the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have recommended up to 40
cycles and the National Health Service (NHS) in Britain admied in
an internal document for staff that it was using 45 cycles of
amplification. A long list of other countries has been doing the same
and at least one ‘testing’ laboratory has been using 50 cycles. Have
you ever heard a doctor, medical ‘expert’ or the media ask what level
of amplification has been used to claim a ‘positive’. The ‘test’ comes
back ‘positive’ and so you have the ‘virus’, end of story. Now we can
see how the government in Tanzania could send off samples from a
goat and a pawpaw fruit under human names and both came back
positive for ‘Covid-19’. Tanzania president John Magufuli mocked
the ‘Covid’ hysteria, the PCR test and masks and refused to import
the DNA-manipulating ‘vaccine’. The Cult hated him and an article
sponsored by the Bill Gates Foundation appeared in the London
Guardian in February, 2021, headed ‘It’s time for Africa to rein in
Tanzania’s anti-vaxxer president’. Well, ‘reined in’ he shortly was.
Magufuli appeared in good health, but then, in March, 2021, he was
dead at 61 from ‘heart failure’. He was replaced by Samia Hassan
Suhulu who is connected to Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum
and she immediately reversed Magufuli’s ‘Covid’ policy. A sample of
cola tested positive for ‘Covid’ with the PCR test in Germany while
American actress and singer-songwriter Erykah Badu tested positive
in one nostril and negative in the other. Footballer Ronaldo called

the PCR test ‘bullshit’ aer testing positive three times and being
forced to quarantine and miss matches when there was nothing
wrong with him. The mantra from Tedros at the World Health
Organization and national governments (same thing) has been test,
test, test. They know that the more tests they can generate the more
fake ‘cases’ they have which go on to become ‘deaths’ in ways I am
coming to. The UK government has its Operation Moonshot planned
to test multiple millions every day in workplaces and schools with
free tests for everyone to use twice a week at home in line with the
Cult plan from the start to make testing part of life. A government
advertisement for an ‘Interim Head of Asymptomatic Testing
Communication’ said the job included responsibility for delivering a
‘communications strategy’ (propaganda) ‘to support the expansion
of asymptomatic testing that ‘normalises testing as part of everyday life’.
More tests means more fake ‘cases’, ‘deaths’ and fascism. I have
heard of, and from, many people who booked a test, couldn’t turn
up, and yet got a positive result through the post for a test they’d
never even had. The whole thing is crazy, but for the Cult there’s
method in the madness. Controlling and manipulating the level of
amplification of the test means the authorities can control whenever
they want the number of apparent ‘cases’ and ‘deaths’. If they want
to justify more fascist lockdown and destruction of livelihoods they
keep the amplification high. If they want to give the illusion that
lockdowns and the ‘vaccine’ are working then they lower the
amplification and ‘cases’ and ‘deaths’ will appear to fall. In January,
2021, the Cult-owned World Health Organization suddenly warned
laboratories about over-amplification of the test and to lower the
threshold. Suddenly headlines began appearing such as: ‘Why ARE
“Covid” cases plummeting?’ This was just when the vaccine rollout
was underway and I had predicted months before they would make
cases appear to fall through amplification tampering when the
‘vaccine’ came. These people are so predictable.
Cow vaccines?

The question must be asked of what is on the test swabs being poked
far up the nose of the population to the base of the brain? A nasal
swab punctured one woman’s brain and caused it to leak fluid. Most
of these procedures are being done by people with lile training or
medical knowledge. Dr Lorraine Day, former orthopaedic trauma
surgeon and Chief of Orthopaedic Surgery at San Francisco General
Hospital, says the tests are really a ‘vaccine’. Cows have long been
vaccinated this way. She points out that masks have to cover the nose
and the mouth where it is claimed the ‘virus’ exists in saliva. Why
then don’t they take saliva from the mouth as they do with a DNA
test instead of pushing a long swab up the nose towards the brain?
The ethmoid bone separates the nasal cavity from the brain and
within that bone is the cribriform plate. Dr Day says that when the
swab is pushed up against this plate and twisted the procedure is
‘depositing things back there’. She claims that among these ‘things’
are nanoparticles that can enter the brain. Researchers have noted
that a team at the Gates-funded Johns Hopkins have designed tiny,
star-shaped micro-devices that can latch onto intestinal mucosa and
release drugs into the body. Mucosa is the thin skin that covers the
inside surface of parts of the body such as the nose and mouth and
produces mucus to protect them. The Johns Hopkins micro-devices
are called ‘theragrippers’ and were ‘inspired’ by a parasitic worm
that digs its sharp teeth into a host’s intestines. Nasal swabs are also
coated in the sterilisation agent ethylene oxide. The US National
Cancer Institute posts this explanation on its website:
At room temperature, ethylene oxide is a flammable colorless gas with a sweet odor. It is used
primarily to produce other chemicals, including antifreeze. In smaller amounts, ethylene
oxide is used as a pesticide and a sterilizing agent. The ability of ethylene oxide to damage
DNA makes it an effective sterilizing agent but also accounts for its cancer-causing activity.
The Institute mentions lymphoma and leukaemia as cancers most
frequently reported to be associated with occupational exposure to
ethylene oxide along with stomach and breast cancers. How does
anyone think this is going to work out with the constant testing

regime being inflicted on adults and children at home and at school
that will accumulate in the body anything that’s on the swab?
Doctors know best
It is vital for people to realise that ‘hero’ doctors ‘know’ only what
the Big Pharma-dominated medical authorities tell them to ‘know’
and if they refuse to ‘know’ what they are told to ‘know’ they are out
the door. They are mostly not physicians or healers, but repeaters of
the official narrative – or else. I have seen alleged professional
doctors on British television make shocking statements that we are
supposed to take seriously. One called ‘Dr’ Amir Khan, who is
actually telling patients how to respond to illness, said that men
could take the birth pill to ‘help slow down the effects of Covid-19’.
In March, 2021, another ridiculous ‘Covid study’ by an American
doctor proposed injecting men with the female sex hormone
progesterone as a ‘Covid’ treatment. British doctor Nighat Arif told
the BBC that face coverings were now going to be part of ongoing
normal. Yes, the vaccine protects you, she said (evidence?) … but the
way to deal with viruses in the community was always going to
come down to hand washing, face covering and keeping a physical
distance. That’s not what we were told before the ‘vaccine’ was
circulating. Arif said she couldn’t imagine ever again going on the
underground or in a li without a mask. I was just thanking my
good luck that she was not my doctor when she said – in March,
2021 – that if ‘we are behaving and we are doing all the right things’
she thought we could ‘have our nearest and dearest around us at
home … around Christmas and New Year! Her patronising delivery
was the usual school teacher talking to six-year-olds as she repeated
every government talking point and probably believed them all. If
we have learned anything from the ‘Covid’ experience surely it must
be that humanity’s perception of doctors needs a fundamental
rethink. NHS ‘doctor’ Sara Kayat told her television audience that
the ‘Covid vaccine’ would ‘100 percent prevent hospitalisation and
death’. Not even Big Pharma claimed that. We have to stop taking
‘experts’ at their word without question when so many of them are

clueless and only repeating the party line on which their careers
depend. That is not to say there are not brilliants doctors – there are
and I have spoken to many of them since all this began – but you
won’t see them in the mainstream media or quoted by the
psychopaths and yes-people in government.
Remember the name – Christian Drosten
German virologist Christian Drosten, Director of Charité Institute of
Virology in Berlin, became a national star aer the pandemic hoax
began. He was feted on television and advised the German
government on ‘Covid’ policy. Most importantly to the wider world
Drosten led a group that produced the ‘Covid’ testing protocol for
the PCR test. What a remarkable feat given the PCR cannot test for
infectious disease and even more so when you think that Drosten
said that his method of testing for SARS-CoV-2 was developed
‘without having virus material available’. He developed a test for a
‘virus’ that he didn’t have and had never seen. Let that sink in as you
survey the global devastation that came from what he did. The
whole catastrophe of Drosten’s ‘test’ was based on the alleged
genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists on the Internet. We
will see in the next chapter that this alleged ‘genetic sequence’ has
never been produced by China or anyone and cannot be when there
is no SARS-CoV-2. Drosten, however, doesn’t seem to let lile details
like that get in the way. He was the lead author with Victor Corman
from the same Charité Hospital of the paper ‘Detection of 2019 novel
coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time PCR‘ published in a magazine
called Eurosurveillance. This became known as the Corman-Drosten
paper. In November, 2020, with human society devastated by the
effects of the Corman-Drosten test baloney, the protocol was publicly
challenged by 22 international scientists and independent
researchers from Europe, the United States, and Japan. Among them
were senior molecular geneticists, biochemists, immunologists, and
microbiologists. They produced a document headed ‘External peer
review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-Cov-2 Reveals 10 Major
Flaws At The Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences

•
•
•
•
•
•
For False-Positive Results’. The flaws in the Corman-Drosten test
included the following:
The test is non-specific because of erroneous design
Results are enormously variable
The test is unable to discriminate between the whole ‘virus’ and
viral fragments
It doesn’t have positive or negative controls
The test lacks a standard operating procedure
It is unsupported by proper peer view
The scientists said the PCR ‘Covid’ testing protocol was not
founded on science and they demanded the Corman-Drosten paper
be retracted by Eurosurveillance. They said all present and previous
Covid deaths, cases, and ‘infection rates’ should be subject to a
massive retroactive inquiry. Lockdowns and travel restrictions
should be reviewed and relaxed and those diagnosed through PCR
to have ‘Covid-19’ should not be forced to isolate. Dr Kevin Corbe,
a health researcher and nurse educator with a long academic career
producing a stream of peer-reviewed publications at many UK
universities, made the same point about the PCR test debacle. He
said of the scientists’ conclusions: ‘Every scientific rationale for the
development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It’s
like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the Covid test.’ He said that China
hadn’t given them an isolated ‘virus’ when Drosten developed the
test. Instead they had developed the test from a sequence in a gene
bank.’ Put another way … they made it up! The scientists were
supported in this contention by a Portuguese appeals court which
ruled in November, 2020, that PCR tests are unreliable and it is
unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test. The point
about China not providing an isolated virus must be true when the
‘virus’ has never been isolated to this day and the consequences of
that will become clear. Drosten and company produced this useless
‘protocol’ right on cue in January, 2020, just as the ‘virus’ was said to

be moving westward and it somehow managed to successfully pass
a peer-review in 24 hours. In other words there was no peer-review
for a test that would be used to decide who had ‘Covid’ and who
didn’t across the world. The Cult-created, Gates-controlled World
Health Organization immediately recommended all its nearly 200
member countries to use the Drosten PCR protocol to detect ‘cases’
and ‘deaths’. The sting was underway and it continues to this day.
So who is this Christian Drosten that produced the means through
which death, destruction and economic catastrophe would be
justified? His education background, including his doctoral thesis,
would appear to be somewhat shrouded in mystery and his track
record is dire as with another essential player in the ‘Covid’ hoax,
the Gates-funded Professor Neil Ferguson at the Gates-funded
Imperial College in London of whom more shortly. Drosten
predicted in 2003 that the alleged original SARS ‘virus’ (SARS-1’)
was an epidemic that could have serious effects on economies and an
effective vaccine would take at least two years to produce. Drosten’s
answer to every alleged ‘outbreak’ is a vaccine which you won’t be
shocked to know. What followed were just 774 official deaths
worldwide and none in Germany where there were only nine cases.
That is even if you believe there ever was a SARS ‘virus’ when the
evidence is zilch and I will expand on this in the next chapter.
Drosten claims to be co-discoverer of ‘SARS-1’ and developed a test
for it in 2003. He was screaming warnings about ‘swine flu’ in 2009
and how it was a widespread infection far more severe than any
dangers from a vaccine could be and people should get vaccinated. It
would be helpful for Drosten’s vocal chords if he simply recorded
the words ‘the virus is deadly and you need to get vaccinated’ and
copies could be handed out whenever the latest made-up threat
comes along. Drosten’s swine flu epidemic never happened, but Big
Pharma didn’t mind with governments spending hundreds of
millions on vaccines that hardly anyone bothered to use and many
who did wished they hadn’t. A study in 2010 revealed that the risk
of dying from swine flu, or H1N1, was no higher than that of the
annual seasonal flu which is what at least most of ‘it’ really was as in
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
