Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1316_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Acknowledgements
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Recognition of the Sick Patient
- •Shock and Organ Perfusion
- •Outcomes of Resuscitation
- •Investigations
- •Fluid and Electrolyte Replacement
- •Haematological Therapy
- •Coagulopathy
- •Antibiotics
- •Emergency Laparoscopic Surgery
- •Approach to Traumatic Abdominal Pain
- •Ancillary Investigations in the ED
- •Indications for Referral
- •References
- •Risk Factors for Surgery
- •Postoperative Care
- •Intensive Care/High Dependency
- •Sepsis Syndromes
- •Acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)
- •Blood transfusion and blood component therapy
- •Postoperative Oliguria
- •Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)
- •Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS)
- •Nutrition
- •Pros and cons of TPN
- •Introduction
- •Initial Management
- •Rockall score
- •Glasgow–Blatchford score
- •Medical Therapy
- •Endoscopic Therapy
- •Timing of endoscopy
- •Epinephrine injection
- •Thermal therapy
- •Argon plasma coagulation
- •Endoscopic clipping
- •Failure of endoscopic therapy
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Management of Variceal Bleeding
- •Medical Management and Resuscitation
- •Endoscopic Management
- •Variceal band ligation
- •Cyanoacrylate glue
- •Endoscopic sclerotherapy
- •Subsequent endoscopy
- •Portosystemic shunts: TIPS and surgery
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Management Options
- •Catheter Angiography
- •CT Angiography
- •Embolic Agents
- •Complications of Angiography
- •Indirect Bleeding
- •References
- •I. Indications
- •II. Preoperative Preparation
- •B. Over-Sewing a Bleeding Ulcer
- •Pyloroplasty/gastroenterostomy
- •Truncal vagotomy
- •Ensure safe duodenal stump closure
- •Dealing with problems related to the posterior duodenal ulcer penetratinginto the pancreas
- •Mobilisation of distal stomach
- •Billroth II gastroenteral anastomosis
- •Surgical Techniques for BleedingGastric Ulcer
- •F. Local Excision of Gastric Ulcer
- •Key Points in Billroth I Gastrectomyfor Bleeding Gastric Ulcer
- •Incisional wound closure
- •Postoperative care
- •References
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Preparation
- •Operative Treatment
- •A. Benign Duodenal Ulcer Perforation
- •B. Benign Gastric Ulcer Perforations
- •References
- •2. Preoperative Preparation
- •3. Surgery
- •Open Appendectomy
- •Introduction
- •General Complications
- •Thromboembolism
- •Atelectasis
- •Nausea and Vomiting
- •Wound Complications
- •Acute Abdominal Complications
- •1. Bleeding
- •2. Leaks
- •Treatment options for GJ leak
- •Managing sleeve leak
- •3. Stenosis and Stricture
- •4. Gastric Band Slippage and IntestinalObstruction
- •5. Other Complications
- •Gastric banding
- •Gastric bypass
- •Nutritional problems
- •1. Indications
- •Operative Strategy of Acute Appendicitis
- •Laparoscopic Appendectomy
- •4. Postoperative care
- •Special Situations
- •Introduction
- •Management of Acute Sigmoid Colonic Diverticulitis
- •A. Preoperative Management
- •B. Indications for Surgery
- •C. Options of Surgical Procedure
- •Two-stage approach
- •Single-stage approach
- •Role of laparoscopic surgery in acute perforative sigmoid colonic diverticulitis
- •E. Position of Patient for Surgery
- •Intra-Operative Surgical Techniques
- •A. Incision and Laparotomy
- •Tips and tricks to help locate the ‘difficult’ left ureter
- •Common sites of left ureteric injury during anterior resection
- •D. Splenic Flexure Take Down
- •Tips and tricks to tackle difficultsplenic flexure
- •E. Vascular Control
- •Ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA)
- •How to identify the IMA?
- •On-table colonic lavage
- •When is it not safe to anastomose?
- •J. Completion of Surgery
- •K. Postoperation Care
- •References
- •Introduction
- •I. Preoperative Management
- •II. Management Options
- •III. Endoscopic Colonic Stenting
- •Indications
- •IV. Defunctioning Stoma
- •Indications
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •References
- •Definition
- •Risk Factors for DifficultLaparoscopic Cholecystectomyin Acute Cholecystitis
- •Preoperative preparation
- •Surgical Treatment
- •Laparoscopic approach
- •References
- •Pre- ERCP Preparation
- •ERCP for Choledocholithiasis
- •ERCP in Bile Duct Injuries
- •Difficult Biliary Cannulation
- •Post- ERCP Care
- •References
- •A) Acute Cholangitis
- •C) Bile Duct Injuries During Surgery
- •D) Pancreatic Trauma
- •E) ERCP Perforation
- •I. Introduction
- •IV. Postoperative Management
- •Special situations
- •Final Note
- •Introduction
- •Disadvantages of Radiological Drainage
- •Radiological Evaluation of the Abscess
- •1) Diagnosis of Abscess
- •2) Identify a Potential Cause for an Abscess
- •3) Determine Drainability of an Abscess
- •4) Identifying the Complications from an Abscess
- •5) Aid Drainage Planning
- •Role of RadiologicalIntervention
- •Contraindications
- •Technique
- •Imaging Guidance
- •Insertion of the Drain
- •Drainage Catheter
- •Site Specific Comments on Radiological Drainage of Intra-Abdominal Abscess
- •Liver Abscess
- •Subphrenic and Lesser Sac Abscess
- •Percutaneous Cholecystostomy
- •Pancreatic Collection/Abscess
- •Pelvic Abscess
- •Enteric Abscess
- •Others
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •I. Ectopic Pregnancy
- •Operative procedures
- •II. Ruptured Tubo-Ovarian Abscess
- •Preoperative
- •Operative procedures
- •Postoperative
- •III. Haemorrhage or LeakingOvarian Cyst and Adnexal Torsion
- •A. Adnexal torsion
- •Preoperative — Benign Ovarian Cyst
- •Laparoscopic intervention
- •2. Laparoscopic ovarian oophorectomy
- •3. Open Cystectomy
- •Introduction
- •Repair of Bladder Injuries
- •Boari Flap
- •Other Manoeuvres
- •Post-Operative Care
- •Conclusion
- •II. Perioperative Care
- •IV. Mycotic Aneurysms
- •VI. Post-Surgery Follow-up
- •I. Introduction and Indications
- •II. Preoperative Management
- •III. OT Preparation
- •IV. Operative Procedure
- •Damage Control Mode
- •Splenic Injuries
- •Bowel Injuries
- •Kidney Injuries
- •Pancreatic Injuries
- •Liver Injuries
- •VI. Postoperative Care
- •V. Wound Closure
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Choice of Surgical Technique
- •Operative Procedure
- •1. Component Separation Technique
- •3. Bilateral Skin Flap Advancement
- •5. Use of Alloplastic Materials
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •Laparotomy
- •Laparoscopy
- •Interventional Radiology
- •Air Enema
- •Neonatal Intestinal Obstruction
- •Duodenal Atresia
- •Duodenoduodenostomy
- •Malrotation with Volvulus
- •Intestinal Atresia
- •Hirschsprung’s Disease (HD)
- •Anorectal Malformations
- •Inguinal Hernia in Children
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Benefits of Laparoscopy in Emergency
- •Indications of Emergency Laparoscopy
- •Instrumentation
- •Instruments for Removal of Specimen
- •Instruments for Port Closure
- •Patient Position and O.T. Setup
- •Suggested Reading
- •Index
- •Uploaded by [StormRG]
- •Contents

giants like Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twier announced very
early on that they would give the Cult/Gates/Tedros/WHO version
of the narrative free advertising and censor those who challenged
their intelligence-insulting, mendacious story.
The next layer in the global ‘medical’ structure below the Cult,
Gates and Tedros are the chief medical officers and science ‘advisers’
in each of the WHO member countries which means virtually all of
them. Medical officers and arbiters of science (they’re not) then take
the WHO policy and recommended responses and impose them on
their country’s population while the political ‘leaders’ say they are
deciding policy (they’re clearly not) by ‘following the science’ on the
advice of the ‘experts’ – the same medical officers and science
‘advisers’ (dictators). In this way with the rarest of exceptions the
entire world followed the same policy of lockdown, people
distancing, masks and ‘vaccines’ dictated by the psychopathic Cult,
psychopathic Gates and psychopathic Tedros who we are supposed
to believe give a damn about the health of the world population they
are seeking to enslave. That, amazingly, is all there is to it in terms of
crucial decision-making. Medical staff in each country then follow
like sheep the dictates of the shepherds at the top of the national
medical hierarchies – chief medical officers and science ‘advisers’
who themselves follow like sheep the shepherds of the World Health
Organization and the Cult. Shepherds at the national level oen
have major funding and other connections to Gates and his Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation which carefully hands out money like
confei at a wedding to control the entire global medical system
from the WHO down.
Follow the money
Christopher Whiy, Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government at
the centre of ‘virus’ policy, a senior adviser to the government’s
Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), and Executive
Board member of the World Health Organization, was gied a grant
of $40 million by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for malaria
research in Africa. The BBC described the unelected Whiy as ‘the

official who will probably have the greatest impact on our everyday
lives of any individual policymaker in modern times’ and so it
turned out. What Gates and Tedros have said Whiy has done like
his equivalents around the world. Patrick Vallance, co-chair of SAGE
and the government’s Chief Scientific Adviser, is a former executive
of Big Pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline with its fundamental financial
and business connections to Bill Gates. In September, 2020, it was
revealed that Vallance owned a deferred bonus of shares in
GlaxoSmithKline worth £600,000 while the company was
‘developing’ a ‘Covid vaccine’. Move along now – nothing to see
here – what could possibly be wrong with that? Imperial College in
London, a major player in ‘Covid’ policy in Britain and elsewhere
with its ‘Covid-19’ Response Team, is funded by Gates and has big
connections to China while the now infamous Professor Neil
Ferguson, the useless ‘computer modeller’ at Imperial College is also
funded by Gates. Ferguson delivered the dramatically inaccurate
excuse for the first lockdowns (much more in the next chapter). The
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) in the United
States, another source of outrageously false ‘Covid’ computer
models to justify lockdowns, is bankrolled by Gates who is a
vehement promotor of lockdowns. America’s version of Whiy and
Vallance, the again now infamous Anthony Fauci, has connections to
‘Covid vaccine’ maker Moderna as does Bill Gates through funding
from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Fauci is director of the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a
major recipient of Gates money, and they are very close. Deborah
Birx who was appointed White House Coronavirus Response
Coordinator in February, 2020, is yet another with ties to Gates.
Everywhere you look at the different elements around the world
behind the coordination and decision making of the ‘Covid’ hoax
there is Bill Gates and his money. They include the World Health
Organization; Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in the United
States; National Institutes of Health (NIH) of Anthony Fauci;
Imperial College and Neil Ferguson; the London School of Hygiene
where Chris Whiy worked; Regulatory agencies like the UK
Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

which gave emergency approval for ‘Covid vaccines’; Wellcome
Trust; GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance; the Coalition for Epidemic
Preparedness Innovations (CEPI); Johns Hopkins University which
has compiled the false ‘Covid’ figures; and the World Economic
Forum. A Nationalfile.com article said:
Gates has a lot of pull in the medical world, he has a multi-million dollar relationship with Dr.
Fauci, and Fauci originally took the Gates line supporting vaccines and casting doubt on [the
drug hydroxychloroquine]. Coronavirus response team member Dr. Deborah Birx, appointed
by former president Obama to serve as United States Global AIDS Coordinator, also sits on the
board of a group that has received billions from Gates’ foundation, and Birx reportedly used a
disputed Bill Gates-funded model for the White House’s Coronavirus effort. Gates is a big
proponent for a population lockdown scenario for the Coronavirus outbreak.
Another funder of Moderna is the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA), the technology-development arm of the
Pentagon and one of the most sinister organisations on earth.
DARPA had a major role with the CIA covert technology-funding
operation In-Q-Tel in the development of Google and social media
which is now at the centre of global censorship. Fauci and Gates are
extremely close and openly admit to talking regularly about ‘Covid’
policy, but then why wouldn’t Gates have a seat at every national
‘Covid’ table aer his Foundation commied $1.75 billion to the
‘fight against Covid-19’. When passed through our Orwellian
Translation Unit this means that he has bought and paid for the Cultdriven ‘Covid’ response worldwide. Research the major ‘Covid’
response personnel in your own country and you will find the same
Gates funding and other connections again and again. Medical and
science chiefs following World Health Organization ‘policy’ sit atop
a medical hierarchy in their country of administrators, doctors and
nursing staff. These ‘subordinates’ are told they must work and
behave in accordance with the policy delivered from the ‘top’ of the
national ‘health’ pyramid which is largely the policy delivered by
the WHO which is the policy delivered by Gates and the Cult. The
whole ‘Covid’ narrative has been imposed on medical staff by a
climate of fear although great numbers don’t even need that to
comply. They do so through breathtaking levels of ignorance and

include doctors who go through life simply repeating what Big
Pharma and their hierarchical masters tell them to say and believe.
No wonder Big Pharma ‘medicine’ is one of the biggest killers on
Planet Earth.
The same top-down system of intimidation operates with regard
to the Cult Big Pharma cartel which also dictates policy through
national and global medical systems in this way. The Cult and Big
Pharma agendas are the same because the former controls and owns
the laer. ‘Health’ administrators, doctors, and nursing staff are told
to support and parrot the dictated policy or they will face
consequences which can include being fired. How sad it’s been to see
medical staff meekly repeating and imposing Cult policy without
question and most of those who can see through the deceit are only
willing to speak anonymously off the record. They know what will
happen if their identity is known. This has le the courageous few to
expose the lies about the ‘virus’, face masks, overwhelmed hospitals
that aren’t, and the dangers of the ‘vaccine’ that isn’t a vaccine. When
these medical professionals and scientists, some renowned in their
field, have taken to the Internet to expose the truth their articles,
comments and videos have been deleted by Cult-owned Facebook,
Twier and YouTube. What a real head-shaker to see YouTube
videos with leading world scientists and highly qualified medical
specialists with an added link underneath to the notorious Cult
propaganda website Wikipedia to find the ‘facts’ about the same
subject.
HIV – the ‘Covid’ trial-run
I’ll give you an example of the consequences for health and truth
that come from censorship and unquestioning belief in official
narratives. The story was told by PCR inventor Kary Mullis in his
book Dancing Naked in the Mind Field. He said that in 1984 he
accepted as just another scientific fact that Luc Montagnier of
France’s Pasteur Institute and Robert Gallo of America’s National
Institutes of Health had independently discovered that a ‘retrovirus’
dubbed HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) caused AIDS. They

were, aer all, Mullis writes, specialists in retroviruses. This is how
the medical and science pyramids work. Something is announced or
assumed and then becomes an everybody-knows-that purely through
repetition of the assumption as if it is fact. Complete crap becomes
accepted truth with no supporting evidence and only repetition of
the crap. This is how a ‘virus’ that doesn’t exist became the ‘virus’
that changed the world. The HIV-AIDS fairy story became a multibillion pound industry and the media poured out propaganda
terrifying the world about the deadly HIV ‘virus’ that caused the
lethal AIDS. By then Mullis was working at a lab in Santa Monica,
California, to detect retroviruses with his PCR test in blood
donations received by the Red Cross. In doing so he asked a
virologist where he could find a reference for HIV being the cause of
AIDS. ‘You don’t need a reference,’ the virologist said … ‘Everybody
knows it.’ Mullis said he wanted to quote a reference in the report he
was doing and he said he felt a lile funny about not knowing the
source of such an important discovery when everyone else seemed
to. The virologist suggested he cite a report by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on morbidity and mortality.
Mullis read the report, but it only said that an organism had been
identified and did not say how. The report did not identify the
original scientific work. Physicians, however, assumed (key recurring
theme) that if the CDC was convinced that HIV caused AIDS then
proof must exist. Mullis continues:
I did computer searches. Neither Montagnier, Gallo, nor anyone else had published papers
describing experiments which led to the conclusion that HIV probably caused AIDS. I read
the papers in Science for which they had become well known as AIDS doctors, but all they
had said there was that they had found evidence of a past infection by something which was
probably HIV in some AIDS patients.
They found antibodies. Antibodies to viruses had always been considered evidence of past
disease, not present disease. Antibodies signaled that the virus had been defeated. The patient
had saved himself. There was no indication in these papers that this virus caused a disease.
They didn’t show that everybody with the antibodies had the disease. In fact they found some
healthy people with antibodies.

Mullis asked why their work had been published if Montagnier
and Gallo hadn’t really found this evidence, and why had they been
fighting so hard to get credit for the discovery? He says he was
hesitant to write ‘HIV is the probable cause of AIDS’ until he found
published evidence to support that. ‘Tens of thousands of scientists
and researchers were spending billions of dollars a year doing
research based on this idea,’ Mullis writes. ‘The reason had to be
there somewhere; otherwise these people would not have allowed
their research to sele into one narrow channel of investigation.’ He
said he lectured about PCR at numerous meetings where people
were always talking about HIV and he asked them how they knew
that HIV was the cause of AIDS:
Everyone said something. Everyone had the answer at home, in the office, in some drawer.
They all knew, and they would send me the papers as soon as they got back. But I never got
any papers. Nobody ever sent me the news about how AIDS was caused by HIV.
Eventually Mullis was able to ask Montagnier himself about the
reference proof when he lectured in San Diego at the grand opening
of the University of California AIDS Research Center. Mullis says
this was the last time he would ask his question without showing
anger. Montagnier said he should reference the CDC report. ‘I read
it’, Mullis said, and it didn’t answer the question. ‘If Montagnier
didn’t know the answer who the hell did?’ Then one night Mullis
was driving when an interview came on National Public Radio with
Peter Duesberg, a prominent virologist at Berkeley and a California
Scientist of the Year. Mullis says he finally understood why he could
not find references that connected HIV to AIDS – there weren’t any!
No one had ever proved that HIV causes AIDS even though it had
spawned a multi-billion pound global industry and the media was
repeating this as fact every day in their articles and broadcasts
terrifying the shit out of people about AIDS and giving the
impression that a positive test for HIV (see ‘Covid’) was a death
sentence. Duesberg was a threat to the AIDS gravy train and the
agenda that underpinned it. He was therefore abused and castigated
aer he told the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

there was no good evidence implicating the new ‘virus’. Editors
rejected his manuscripts and his research funds were deleted. Mullis
points out that the CDC has defined AIDS as one of more than 30
diseases if accompanied by a positive result on a test that detects
antibodies to HIV; but those same diseases are not defined as AIDS
cases when antibodies are not detected:
If an HIV-positive woman develops uterine cancer, for example, she is considered to have
AIDS. If she is not HIV positive, she simply has uterine cancer. An HIV-positive man with
tuberculosis has AIDS; if he tests negative he simply has tuberculosis. If he lives in Kenya or
Colombia, where the test for HIV antibodies is too expensive, he is simply presumed to have
the antibodies and therefore AIDS, and therefore he can be treated in the World Health
Organization’s clinic. It’s the only medical help available in some places. And it’s free,
because the countries that support WHO are worried about AIDS.
Mullis accuses the CDC of continually adding new diseases (see ever
more ‘Covid symptoms’) to the grand AIDS definition and of
virtually doctoring the books to make it appear as if the disease
continued to spread. He cites how in 1993 the CDC enormously
broadened its AIDS definition and county health authorities were
delighted because they received $2,500 per year from the Federal
government for every reported AIDS case. Ladies and gentlemen, I
have just described, via Kary Mullis, the ‘Covid pandemic’ of 2020
and beyond. Every element is the same and it’s been pulled off in the
same way by the same networks.
The ‘Covid virus’ exists? Okay – prove it. Er … still waiting
What Kary Mullis described with regard to ‘HIV’ has been repeated
with ‘Covid’. A claim is made that a new, or ‘novel’, infection has
been found and the entire medical system of the world repeats that
as fact exactly as they did with HIV and AIDS. No one in the
mainstream asks rather relevant questions such as ‘How do you
know?’ and ‘Where is your proof?’ The SARS-Cov-2 ‘virus’ and the
‘Covid-19 disease’ became an overnight ‘everybody-knows-that’.
The origin could be debated and mulled over, but what you could
not suggest was that ‘SARS-Cov-2’ didn’t exist. That would be

ridiculous. ‘Everybody knows’ the ‘virus’ exists. Well, I didn’t for
one along with American proper doctors like Andrew Kaufman and
Tom Cowan and long-time American proper journalist Jon
Rappaport. We dared to pursue the obvious and simple question:
‘Where’s the evidence?’ The overwhelming majority in medicine,
journalism and the general public did not think to ask that. Aer all,
everyone knew there was a new ‘virus’. Everyone was saying so and I
heard it on the BBC. Some would eventually argue that the ‘deadly
virus’ was nothing like as deadly as claimed, but few would venture
into the realms of its very existence. Had they done so they would
have found that the evidence for that claim had gone AWOL as with
HIV causes AIDS. In fact, not even that. For something to go AWOL
it has to exist in the first place and scientific proof for a ‘SARS-Cov-2’
can be filed under nothing, nowhere and zilch.
Dr Andrew Kaufman is a board-certified forensic psychiatrist in
New York State, a Doctor of Medicine and former Assistant
Professor and Medical Director of Psychiatry at SUNY Upstate
Medical University, and Medical Instructor of Hematology and
Oncology at the Medical School of South Carolina. He also studied
biology at the Massachuses Institute of Technology (MIT) and
trained in Psychiatry at Duke University. Kaufman is retired from
allopathic medicine, but remains a consultant and educator on
natural healing, I saw a video of his very early on in the ‘Covid’ hoax
in which he questioned claims about the ‘virus’ in the absence of any
supporting evidence and with plenty pointing the other way. I did
everything I could to circulate his work which I felt was asking the
pivotal questions that needed an answer. I can recommend an
excellent pull-together interview he did with the website The Last
Vagabond entitled Dr Andrew Kaufman: Virus Isolation, Terrain Theory
and Covid-19 and his website is andrewkaufmanmd.com. Kaufman is
not only a forensic psychiatrist; he is forensic in all that he does. He
always reads original scientific papers, experiments and studies
instead of second-third-fourth-hand reports about the ‘virus’ in the
media which are repeating the repeated repetition of the narrative.
When he did so with the original Chinese ‘virus’ papers Kaufman

realised that there was no evidence of a ‘SARS-Cov-2’. They had
never – from the start – shown it to exist and every repeat of this
claim worldwide was based on the accepted existence of proof that
was nowhere to be found – see Kary Mullis and HIV. Here we go
again.
Let’s postulate
Kaufman discovered that the Chinese authorities immediately
concluded that the cause of an illness that broke out among about
200 initial patients in Wuhan was a ‘new virus’ when there were no
grounds to make that conclusion. The alleged ‘virus’ was not
isolated from other genetic material in their samples and then shown
through a system known as Koch’s postulates to be the causative
agent of the illness. The world was told that the SARS-Cov-2 ‘virus’
caused a disease they called ‘Covid-19’ which had ‘flu-like’
symptoms and could lead to respiratory problems and pneumonia.
If it wasn’t so tragic it would almost be funny. ‘Flu-like’ symptoms’?
Pneumonia? Respiratory disease? What in CHINA and particularly in
Wuhan, one of the most polluted cities in the world with a resulting
epidemic of respiratory disease?? Three hundred thousand people
get pneumonia in China every year and there are nearly a billion
cases worldwide of ‘flu-like symptoms’. These have a whole range of
causes – including pollution in Wuhan – but no other possibility was
credibly considered in late 2019 when the world was told there was a
new and deadly ‘virus’. The global prevalence of pneumonia and
‘flu-like systems’ gave the Cult networks unlimited potential to rediagnose these other causes as the mythical ‘Covid-19’ and that is
what they did from the very start. Kaufman revealed how Chinese
medical and science authorities (all subordinates to the Cult-owned
communist government) took genetic material from the lungs of
only a few of the first patients. The material contained their own
cells, bacteria, fungi and other microorganisms living in their bodies.
The only way you could prove the existence of the ‘virus’ and its
responsibility for the alleged ‘Covid-19’ was to isolate the virus from
all the other material – a process also known as ‘purification’ – and

then follow the postulates sequence developed in the late 19th
century by German physician and bacteriologist Robert Koch which
became the ‘gold standard’ for connecting an alleged causation
agent to a disease:
1. The microorganism (bacteria, fungus, virus, etc.) must be present in every case of the
disease and all patients must have the same symptoms. It must also not be present in healthy
individuals.
2. The microorganism must be isolated from the host with the disease. If the microorganism
is a bacteria or fungus it must be grown in a pure culture. If it is a virus, it must be purified
(i.e. containing no other material except the virus particles) from a clinical sample.
3. The specific disease, with all of its characteristics, must be reproduced when the
infectious agent (the purified virus or a pure culture of bacteria or fungi) is inoculated into a
healthy, susceptible host.
4. The microorganism must be recoverable from the experimentally infected host as in step
2.
Not one of these criteria has been met in the case of ‘SARS-Cov-2’ and
‘Covid-19’. Not ONE. EVER. Robert Koch refers to bacteria and not
viruses. What are called ‘viral particles’ are so minute (hence masks
are useless by any definition) that they could only be seen aer the
invention of the electron microscope in the 1930s and can still only
be observed through that means. American bacteriologist and
virologist Thomas Milton Rivers, the so-called ‘Father of Modern
Virology’ who was very significantly director of the Rockefeller
Institute for Medical Research in the 1930s, developed a less
stringent version of Koch’s postulates to identify ‘virus’ causation
known as ‘Rivers criteria’. ‘Covid’ did not pass that process either.
Some even doubt whether any ‘virus’ can be isolated from other
particles containing genetic material in the Koch method. Freedom
of Information requests in many countries asking for scientific proof
that the ‘Covid virus’ has been purified and isolated and shown to
exist have all come back with a ‘we don’t have that’ and when this
happened with a request to the UK Department of Health they
added this comment:
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
