Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3829_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
14 Мб
Скачать
☆
56.
https://t.me/med1917
ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF
ILIOCAVAL THROMBOSIS
Patricia E.  orpe and Francisco J.  Osse
INTRODUCTION
 e term “endovenous” entered our vocabulary in the early 1990s to describe the percutaneous procedures performed to treat successive patients presenting with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) superimposed on varying stages of chronic venous occlusive disease. Rarely did we see a case of “ rst episode” DVT. Gradually, the procedures evolved to include staged endovascular recon­struction of extensive, purely chronic axial vein occlu­sion in very symptomatic patients. During this time, the term “endovascular” had been touted, around the globe, as the new frontier in vascular surgery. Techniques devel­oped between 1950 and 1975 by Seldinger, Amplatz, Dotter, Gruntzig, Judkins, and others, were “borrowed” and incorporated into innovative, percutaneous meth­ods of treating aortic aneurysm and carotid disease. But, over the years, minimally invasive treatment of iliocaval obstruction has not become part of the repertoire of most vascular surgeons or interventional radiologists.  is is a re ection of many factors. First, consider that periph­eral vascular arterial disease is so prevalent that there are hardly enough physicians to care for the growing number of patients. Although chronic venous disease is the most common problem in vascular medicine, venous occlusive disease is technically challenging, o en involving multiple segments, damaged valves, and di cult terrain to navigate. Few specialized tools have been developed, and those are mainly for addressing acute thrombosis. Furthermore, resi­dents and fellows training in fragmented programs have trouble getting enough training in specialized areas of endovascular surgery. With limited time and energy, most focus on gaining experience with arterial disease. Catheter skills are essential in performing endovenous procedures. Venous cases can be more time-consuming than arterial procedures, and reimbursement is o en less than for faster arterial interventions. It is nonetheless as gratifying to suc­cessfully treat chronic venous obstruction and relieve the
heaviness and pain of venous hypertension as it is to open an occluded iliac artery and relieve claudication. So here we will begin with a chapter on the endovenous manage­ment of iliocaval thrombosis.
CLINICAL HISTORY AND
EVALUATION
It is not a surprise that the clinical manifestations of iliocaval occlusion comprise a wide spectrum of signs and symptoms of venous hypertension.  e recruitment of collateral path­ways may be adequate as well as occult; some thrombosed individuals can remain symptom-free. Symptomatic indi­viduals may present with variable lower extremity edema and a variety of complaints related to venous hyperten­sion.  ere are three common clinical presentations among patients with chronic venous obstruction; (1)asymptom­atic, (2)acutely symptomatic with underlying pathology, and (3)chronically symptomatic. re ects the venous pathology. Asymptomatic patients may have transient signs or symptoms that are not disabling. For example, asymptomatic patients may have limb, vul­var, or abdominal varices indicating venous hypertension, focal phlebitis within a varix or mild edema, intermittent groin pain, and a tiny ulcer (Figure56.1). However, all of these signs and symptoms can increase in intensity and fre­quency if the venous  ow pattern is further compromised. For example, super cial vein removal for varicosities, in a patient with iliofemoral occlusion, can lead to severe venous stasis and skin changes (Figure56.2).
Acute caval thrombosis commonly presents with uni­lateral or bilateral lower limb edema, unexplained recent weight gain, and not infrequently, back pain.  e lack of collateral  ow causes lower limb edema, discoloration, and discomfort.  e back pain re ects venous congestion in the sacral plexus. Patients have no di culty recognizing the seriousness of their condition, even though it may have
1
 e clinical presentation
468
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.1 Le leg edema or nonthrombotic venous hypertension
related to le iliac compression. Lymphedema can be a component.
developed gradually. Early on, symptoms can mimic sciatica and spinal, bowel, or bladder problems. However. when a critical mass of thrombus  nally interrupts deep venous  ow, venous hypertension progresses rapidly (Figures56.3,56.4).
Chronic iliocaval occlusion is o en more di cult to diag­nose, since collaterals and recanalization alter the hemody­namics which dictate the severity of the venous hypertension.
Chronic inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion can result in either bilateral or unilateral lower extremity edema. Prominent collateral veins can be seen on the lower anterior abdomi­nal wall and in the perineal or pubic region (Figures56.5,
56.6). Bilateral varicose veins may be present. Advanced skin changes including hyperpigmentation, lipodermatosclerosis and ulceration can develop. Venous stasis changes may lead to below-the-knee amputation years before the venous obstruc­tion is identi ed. Patients with iliocaval occlusion o en report that leg elevation does little to alleviate edema.  is suggests a component of phlebolymphedema, perhaps sec-
2
ondary to venous obstruction.
Prolonged sitting can cause a vague inguinal ache. Exertion may cause venous claudication. Patients frequently report shortness of breath, even without any history of pulmonary embolus or respiratory ailments. Lower back discomfort or hematuria can be presenting signs. As a rule, patients with long-standing venous insu ciency, secondary to venous obstruction, are seen by primary care physicians long before they are referred to vascular specialists. Patients commonly report being told “there is not much we can do for you other than compression.” Treatment of post­thrombotic syndrome commonly means compression stock­ings. Patients may have a remote history of iliofemoral DVT but no suspicion of central venous obstruction, since no one ever evaluated this area. Alternatively, they may have a prior diagnosis of iliocaval occlusion, or have been told that the IVC is absent following phlebography or if cross-sectional imaging.  e chronically thrombosed cava becomes isodense with surrounding so tissue, and large collaterals seen using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imag­ery (MRI) may be interpreted as lymphadenopathy and thereby prompt a search for malignancy.
Figure56.2 e right leg shows all the signs of advanced skin changes of chronic venous hypertension.  e circumferential hyperpigmentation and
lipodermatosclerosis became worse, and ulcers developed, a er the patient underwent saphenous vein stripping for varicosities seven years before this photo. Her remote history of iliofemoral DVT went undiscovered until she presented with acute DVT following the stripping surgery. She responded to thrombolysis and iliac stenting, Her right leg improved, and the pain decreased signi cantly, which greatly enhanced her quality oflife.
ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ILIOCAVAL THROMBOSIS • 469
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.3 Cyanosis secondary to massive venous obstruction in a
patient (Figure56.4) with chronic bilateral iliocaval occlusion and acute le iliofemoral thrombosis.
Figure56.5 Abdominal varices indicating chronic occlusion of the
inferior vena cava in a 45-year-old man with bilateral stasis ulcers.
IMAGING ILIOCAVAL DISEASE
 e evaluation of obstructive venous disease utilizes mul­tiple imaging modalities. We begin with duplex ultrasound (DU).  e exam includes looking at the in ow and out ow of the limb.  is means the exam includes below-the-knee veins as well as the iliac segments above the inguinal liga­ment. Wave-form analysis and velocity measurements are important when suspecting proximal obstruction. Speci cally look for high velocities in the le common iliac segment, which can indicate a focal compression by the right iliac artery. Large collaterals adjacent to the common iliac might be present. However, they will show nonphasic  ow. Nonphasic  ow is seen in collaterals and axial veins distal to an obstructing lesion. A normal pattern returns
a er stenting (Figure 56.7). Patients must be monitored for restenosis at 6-month intervals for the  rst 1–2years post-op or if they become symptomatic. Many patients have a “normal” duplex exam even when they have restenosis. We  nd objective measurements are helpful. Labropoulos etal. established criteria for de ning signi cant venous steno-
3
sis with DU.
Following baseline DU, patients underwent phlebography and intravascular pull-back pressure mea­surements before treatment of an identi ed stenosis.  e data showed that a pressure gradient greater than or equal to 3.0mmHg correlates with a greater than 50% stenosis. Apeak velocity ratio of 2.5 correlated with a pressure gradi­ent of 3.0mmHg.  ese criteria pertain best to focal ste­noses. In long-segment 12-mm stents, we  nd that di use intrastent hyperplasia will decrease the velocity.  erefore,
Figure56.4 e initial thrombosis is this patient occurred a er an aortobifemoral bypass 20years prior to his presentation with hematuria and acute
lower extremity edema that was clearly greater on the le .  e image on the le shows his legs at 1month follow-up a er iliocaval reconstruction.
470 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.6 Venograms of the IVC before and a er thrombolysis and stenting.  is 17-year-old patient presented with acute le leg thrombosis. He
has a single kidney and a pattern of chronic caval obstruction that was unknown prior to the DVT. His initial treatment was in 1997, and he remains patent with one subsequent intervention for focal caval and iliac in stent restenosis in2007.
we use serial velocity measurements to screen for restenosis since visualization is unreliable.
Contrast phlebography provides the clearest understand-
ing of obstructive disease. real-time digital phlebography
shows rate of contrast clearance and contrast density pat­terns that can be helpful. Awide le common iliac segment indicates compression.
Demonstration of collaterals pathopneumonic for obstruction is clearly seen in patients with iliocaval obstruc­tion. Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and com­puted tomographic venography (CTV) reconstructions can demonstrate le vein iliac compression with multiple views (Figures56.8, 56.9). However, both gadolinium and CO2 have been shown to be less e ective contrast agents
3
than iodinated contrast in the venous system.
 in-slice
CT, widely used for diagnosis of pulmonary embolus, is
4
not always sensitive for distal DVT.
 e 64-slice CTV can produce impressive images of the lower extremities when contrast is injected distally via pedal intravenous access. We recommend that cross-sectional imaging and duplex be combined with phlebography if intervention is planned. Imaging of iliac compression is best done with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). A decrease in cross-sectional area can be calculated, and the tightness of the anterior-posterior diameter relative to the transverse diameter indicates a hemodynamically signi cant lesion. We recommend documentation of the lesion with IVUS p r e a n d p o s t s t e n t i n g .
Figure56.7 Duplex waveforms show the loss of phasicity when there is a
proximal iliac obstruction. Following stent placement, the waveform is phasic, and the peak systolic velocity is similar to the other limb, which serves as a control.
TREATMENT OPTIONS
S Y M P T O M A T I C I V C O C C L U S I O N
Symptomatic IVC occlusion, whether acute or chronic, responds poorly to conservative therapy. Medical treatment with anticoagulation alone will do little to alleviate the mul­tisegmental occlusion of large axial veins. Despite heparin,
ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ILIOCAVAL THROMBOSIS • 471
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.8 CTA showing where the right common iliac artery crosses
the le common iliacvein.
warfarin, and autolysis, the risk of pulmonary embolus is high, and the threat of phlegmasia exists. Over time, the IVC syndrome may develop, leading to discomfort and dis­ability. Historically, surgical intervention was reserved for severe cases and clinical results were mixed due to the mor­bidity of such high-risk surgery. In 2001, Jost etal. reported overall 3-year primary and secondary patency rates of 54% and 62% in patients undergoing surgical reconstruc-
5
tion for nonmalignant obstruction from 1985 to 1999.
In
view of these limitations, endovascular repair of acute and
Figure56.9 An image from MRV allows measurement of vessel diameters
and shows the le common iliac vein compression and ascending lumbar collateral.
chronic IVC and combination iliocaval obstruction has evolved over the past 25years. Early stainless steel stents were e ective in strutting caval lesions, and they were asso-
6,7
ciated with signi cant restenosis.
As early as April 1993, we began placing self-expanding metallic stents in chroni­cally occluded iliac veins and the IVC. We have followed hundreds of patients over the years to track the long-term clinical outcomes and perform reinterventions to maintain
8
patency.
Published reports since 2000 have shown endo-
venous reconstruction to be a safe, e ective, and durable
9–22
treatment option.
Following two decades of clinical experience, absent any large randomized trials, the mini­mally invasive, percutaneous approach has been declared an acceptable, if not preferred, treatment for symptomatic
20
iliocaval obstruction or stenosis.
 e 2008 guidelines published by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend phamacomechanical thrombolysis in preference to catheter-directed thrombolysis alone in the
23
treatment of selected cases of acuteDVT.
N O N T H R O M B O T I C
LEFT COMMON ILIAC
OBSTRUCTION:MAYTHURNER
 e prevalence of le iliac vein compression may be higher than concluded from autopsy studies in the 1940s. Originally described by Cockett and  omas, the anatomi­cal lesion was thought to be hemodynamically signi cant
24,25
in approximately 30% of the population.
Two German pathologists, May and  urner  rst described their iliac compression  ndings in 1957.  eir names are associated with the clinical syndrome that re ects the mechanical risk factor for le leg thrombosis. Nonthrombotic manifesta­tion of unilateral venous hypertension, due to common iliac vein narrowing, is now considered by some as an indica-
17
tion for stent placement,
 e presence and persistence of such a lesion helps explain the high rethrombosis rate a er balloon thrombectomy or early catheter-directed throm­bolysis. Removal of acute iliofemoral thrombus without correction of the underlying lesion will almost invariably result in rethrombosis. Investigation with IVUS provides valuable information about the appearance and function of the common iliac vein near the bifurcation. Although in most patients duplex can identify the presence of collaterals or a focal shi in velocity (at the area of right iliac artery compression of the vein), direct visualization and measure­ment with IVUS are ideal. In the absence of thrombosis, a high-grade lesion is characterized by anteroposterior (AP) diameter of less than 3.0mm, pressure gradient of ≥ 3.0mmHg, distal stasis, and visible collateral veins. Such lesions merit consideration of stenting to prevent thrombo­sis in the future.
Neglen reported that a single anatomical lesion was
identi ed in the proximal le common iliac vein in 36% of
17
the 255 patients included in their study.
Asmaller group,
472 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
8%, had a compressive lesion near the internal iliac bifurca-
https://t.me/med1917
tion. In 46% of the patients, a combination of proximal and distal lesion was observed. Whereas the proximal lesion is more common on the le , there is an equal incidence of the distal narrowing.  e cause of the distal lesions is extrinsic compression from the iliac artery, but relatively little  brosis occurs at this level compared to the proximal lesions.  e arterial compression and proximity of the spine can result in intrinsic vein wall thickening in the proximal le iliac. Bilateral common iliac compression is found in approxi­mately 2% of the population. Whereas IVUS measurements and images are de nitive, the phlebographic image is o en misinterpreted as normal.  e wider transverse diameter, and lighter contrast density, in the common iliac segment are consistent with AP narrowing of the vein. But, if col­laterals are not seen, and the characteristic impression of the right iliac artery is not identi ed, the diagnosis can be missed with phlebography. Collaterals that are visualized with valsalva may not be apparent with normal respiration in a supine position.
A C U T E T H R O M B O T I C
OBSTRUCTION
Catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombec­tomy, and combination therapy have evolved over the past two decades. For the most part, patients presenting with phlegmasia cerulean dolens are referred for catheter-directed thrombolysis in centers where interventionalists are avail­able. Patients not responding to standard heparin and war­farin therapy may also be referred for catheter-directed lysis. However, the majority of DVT patients treated in the emergency room are discharged with low molecular weight heparin and are no longer routinely hospitalized for bed rest. A multidisciplinary, multicenter clinical trial, under the auspices of the NIH, was initiated in 2007 to investigate the bene ts of early endovascular thrombus removal (with thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy and adjunc­tive use of stents) compared with standard anticoagulation
27
therapy.
Prevention of postthrombotic syndrome is a pri­mary goal of early endovascular intervention.  e objective of the study is the acquisition of Level Idata, comparing anti­coagulation alone with thrombus removal plus anticoagu­lation.  e strategy of early thrombus removal reduces the likelihood of pulmonary embolus as well as postthrombotic syndrome.
Early observations of the natural history of DVT and subsequent evaluations following lysis revealed several  nd­ings. Distal valvular incompetence can develop in patients with persistent proximal obstruction, even if distal veins are
28,29
not a ected by the DVT. is associated with a higher incidence of recurrent DVT.
Persistent residual thrombus
30
Finally, the combination of obstruction and re ux leads to more severe postthrombotic syndrome than either condi-
29
tion alone.
CHRONIC THROMBOTIC
OBSTRUCTION:MAYTHURNER +
THROMBOSIS
Prior to 2000, reports detailing the use of thrombolytic therapy and stents for use in venous thrombosis focused on patients with acute thrombosis, in whom about 50% have an underlying iliac lesion or May- urner compression. Ver y o  en, the acute clinical presentation is deceptive, since the “critical mass” of thrombus that causes the clinical symp­toms is composed of newer thrombus superimposed on a substrate of subacute or even chronic thrombus.
Endovascular stenting of chronic iliac occlusions, a er removal of acute thrombus, has become familiar to inter­ventionalists treating venous obstruction. Balloon angio­plasty proved to be inadequate in treating iliac lesions. We frequently use catheter-directed thrombolysis, with tissue plasminogen activator, to so en occlusive throm­bus and facilitate guide-wire passage through apparently impossible occlusions. Venography and IVUS demon­strate the occlusive, echo-dense thrombus that obliterates the lumen (Figures56.10, 56.11).  e initial venograms will show very little of the residual caval and iliac seg­ments. Following overnight thrombolysis, using a bilateral popliteal approach, the venogram will reveal additional venous anatomy.  e procedure progresses very methodi­cally in caval reconstructions. Serial angioplasty pre­cedes simultaneous deployment of kissing self-expanding stents (Figures 56.12, 56.13).  e long-term patency of large-caliber (12- to 16-mm) self-expanding stents placed in the common iliac segment is acceptable and compares
Figure56.10 A venogram of a May- urner lesion and thromboses of the
iliac veins.  e image is taken with the patient prone on the angio table. Note the retroperitoneal and transpelvic collaterals.
32,33
31
ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ILIOCAVAL THROMBOSIS • 473
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.11 Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) Volcano Eagle Eye 6F
catheter image of a severe and chronic iliac occlusion where the residual lumen has been obliterated. It is usually necessary to used thrombolytic therapy to facilitate wire traversal of such lesions.
favorably to surgical thrombectomy, alone, and bypass
33
surgery.
Neglen and Raju reported early experience with cannulation of totally occluded segments and technical success of stenting as 98% and 97%, respectively, in the treatment of ninety-four consecutive patients with sus-
12
pected iliac vein obstruction.
In this series, the reported
primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 1year were 82%, 91%, and 92%, respectively.
 e clinical impact of correcting the deep venous obstructive lesions in symptomatic patients can be mea­sured in terms of quality of life as pain and swelling dimin­ish when the venous hypertension is reduced by restoration of axial  ow. In 2002, Raju etal. reported on the clinical impact of the venous stents in managing chronic venous
12
insu ciency.
 is was the  rst mention in the litera­ture of the e ect of stenting on the healing of venous sta­sis ulcers. Stasis dermatitis and ulceration was present in 69/304 (23%) limbs treated with stenting with or without saphenous ablation.  ey reported that the cumulative recurrence-free ulcer healing rate was 63% at 24months. Furthermore, the rate of healing was not in uenced by con­comitant treatment of saphenous re ux.  e reduction of pain and swelling a er intervention were both statistically signi cant (P < 0.001).
IVC occlusion, in combination with iliac obstruction, can lead to severe venous hypertension when collateral circulation is inadequate.  e IVC syndrome can include lower extremity swelling, stasis dermatitis and ulceration, varicosities, and loss of sensation and strength in the legs. Pain can be felt in the lower back, pelvis, or inguinal region in addition to the discomfort and heaviness in one or both limbs. It is most common to discover caval obstruction con­ ned to the infrarenal cava. In patients in whom we have suspected an early thrombosis in infancy, the entire IVC was discovered to be very narrow, as if minimally recana­lized following thrombosis.
Figure56.12 ese images show the baseline cavagram and the result of overnight thrombolysis. Additional anatomy is revealed by infusing a
thrombolytic agent for 12–18 hours via multi–side hole catheters advanced from a popliteal approach. In the second image, note the  lling defects and the tram-track sign revealing the residual thrombus.
474 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.13 ree images showing the sequence of a baseline cavagram followed by stages of the reconstruction. Following bilateral popliteal catheter
placement for thrombolysis, eventually a wire can be passed into the suprarenal cava. In this case, both wires pass through a previously occluded caval  lter. Initial caval dilatation starts with small-diameter balloons and progresses to kissing 10- to 12- mm balloons.  e third image shows the double barrel stents traversing the  lter.
F O C A L I S S U E S F O R
ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY
A. IVUS: IVUS is an important tool in endovenous therapy. It has application in two main areas: (1) assess­ing the nonthrombosed common iliac segment and (2)in the follow-up examination of with signs and symptoms of restenosis. In the  rst instance, IVUS has proven to be the best way to image and evaluate the iliac stenosis in the
11
May- urner syndrome.
Whereas the phlebogram will generally demonstrate widening of the transverse diameter of the common iliac segment, and decrease in the intensity of contrast, IVUS will clearly reveal the severity of the AP narrowing causing high venous resistance (Figures56.14,
56.15).  e presence of collaterals has previously thought to be necessary for diagnosis of a hemodynamically signi cant iliac lesion. Information from IVUS has shown that not all signi cant narrowings are accompanied by collaterals, which can be demonstrated phlebographically in the supine position.
B. RESTENOSIS: Restenosis is important issue in stenting. Untreated restenosis can lead to rethrombosis. Whereas early rethrombosis (<30days) is usually due to inadequate anticoagulation or in ow and out ow issues, late loss of patency is most o en due to intimal hyperpla­sia and subsequent thrombosis. When patients present with recurrent symptoms of limb edema or discomfort, the intensity is generally much less than the initial clinical presentation.  e routine duplex exam will generally show patency of the stents.  e wave form will remain phasic. Intimal hyperplasia, or in-stent restenosis, is best imaged
with IVUS. Before we had access to IVUS, we would redi­late stents in patients with recurrent pain or edema.  e symptoms and signs resolved. As little as 30–35% lumi­nal decrease by intimal hyperplasia can cause recurrence
Figure56.14 An excellent example of how compression of the le
common iliac vein results in widening of the transverse diameter and narrowing of the anteroposterior lumen. On the venogram, this causes decrease in the intensity of contrast.  is is the classic appearance of a May- urner compression on venography.
ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ILIOCAVAL THROMBOSIS • 475
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.15 IVUS image the iliac compression seen in Figure56.14.
 e AP diameter is “pancaked,” and the echogenic rim indicates  brotic thickening of the vein wall.  is slit-like appearance shows why the contrast is less dense and why the  ow velocity increases at the May- urner lesion.
of symptoms. In 2004, Neglen and Raju reported their observations of restenosis in venous stents and concluded that risk factors included a history of venous thrombosis, a positive test for thrombophilia, and longer stent systems
34
extending below the inguinal ligament.
Gender and side had no signi cance. A er 42months of observation in 324 limbs treated with stenting, 23% had no sign of luminal narrowing on phlebography, 61% showed greater than 20% narrowing, and 15% showed greater than 50% narrow­ing.  e value of identifying restenosis is in maintaining long-term patency of the stents.  eir study showed that reintervention optimizes long-term patency. At 3years, pri­mary, primary assisted, and secondary patency were 75%, 90%, and 93%, respectively.
C. ANTICOAGULATION: Once  ow is reestab­lished with stents, anticoagulation is important in patients with thrombophilia and those with signi cant residual distal thrombus and vein wall irregularity from previous DVT. Both conditions are risk factors for recurrent DVT despite good iliac  ow. However, in patients with normal distal veins, the presence of a single or double iliac stent does not require long-term anticoagulation, per se.  e use of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents varies among clinicians. Low molecular weight heparin is used to bridge subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) levels, particularly in patients who must travel more than 2 hours to return home. Plavix, 75 mg/d, is started prior to stent­ing and continued for 30 d.Patients not on warfarin also take 80 mg aspirin. It should be noted that rethrombosis of a metallic stent is a matter of urgency. In our experience, it is much more di cult, and sometimes not possible, to reopen chronic in-stent thrombosis. Unlike organized thrombus in native veins, the old thrombus in occluded stents is very hard to traverse.
D. STENTS: Self-expanding metallic stents are used in venous stenting.  e 12- to 14-mm Wallstent (Boston Scienti c, Natick, MA) has been used more than other stents because of the good long-term patency rates, the visibility under  uoroscopy, and the ability to reposition. Stent migration is rare, but can occur with any stent if it is undersized and the vein expands. Tandem Wallstents will not interlock as the SmartStent (Cordis, New Brunswick, NJ) will.  e foreshortening of the Wallstent requires expe­rience, and there are time when a stent that does not fore­shorten is ideal. Asingle, high-grade focal stenosis requires a su ciently long stent to prevent the stent from slipping (like a watermelon seed) to either side. In our experience, long-term success of these interventions is also related to establishing continuity of  ow within the deep system of the entire lower extremity. Poor in ow from the tibiopop­liteal segments, or the femoral may compromise long term patency as much as poor-out ow caused by under-stenting the iliac compression. Stents must extend into the IVC to completely treat the iliac compression. Otherwise, the com­pression persists and the stent can thrombose (Figure56.16).
Pitfalls include the following situations. Visualizing the IVC with contrast alone can give a false estimate of the vein diameter. Above the thrombotic occlusion or stenosis, a normal vein may not expand with contrast injection due to low volume. Placement of an under­sized stent can result in migration (Figure56.17). Avery tight, focal lesion should be treated with a longer stent. Trying to match the length of the lesion too closely can result in the stent slipping above or below the lesion dur­ing deployment (Figure 56.18). Adequate apposition to the vein wall, above or below the lesion, will prevent this problem.  e ends of the self-expanding stents can be sharp. Adequate overlap of 15–20mm at the interface
Figure56.16 CT showing stent position too low in the iliac vein. It is
below the right iliac artery, which can still compress the vein. Stents must be extended into the IVC by 1–2 centimeters. Failure to do so can result in early thrombosis of thestent.
476 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
https://t.me/med1917
Figure56.17 CT image of a stent that migrated to the right atrium.
 e stent was placed in the suprarenal IVC on the preceding day. Before IVUS, the diameter of the IVC could be underestimated with low-volume contrast imaging.  e stent migrated to the heart and caused a tapenade.  e percutaneous removal required a 16-Fr sheath in the jugular vein, a 20-mm goose-neck snare, a femoral catheter, a multidisciplinary team and determination.  e 22-year-old patient made a full recovery.
of stents during tandem deployment is important to pre­vent a bare area.  is gap can be a site for restenosis. More importantly, it prevents possible perforation of the vein wall (Figure 56.19). In all instances, one must be pre­pared to address the complication. Snares can be use to retrieve a stent, and covered stents can be used to prevent e x s a n g u i n a t i o n .
E. OCCLUDED VENOUS STENTS: Reopening a chronically occluded venous stent can be very di cult. It is much harder than reestablishing  ow in a chronically occluded native vessel. If a stent thromboses, immediate intervention is recommended. Lysis of acute thrombus can restore patency. Chronic thrombus can be traversed, but there is no good way to debulk organized thrombus within the stent lumen. Apilot lumen may be achieved with rota­tional atherectomy using the JetStream 3 (Pathway Medical Technologies, Kirkland, WA)  is will permit placement of the wire for dilatation. Cutting balloons and angioplasty may expand the channel, but we lack endovascular tools to “clean out” the stent. Placement of a new stent, within the lumen, may provide adequate  ow. It is, however, hard to expand the inner stent when there is a circumferential layer of organized thrombus.  ere is a high risk of rethrom­bosis with a narrow lumen. Most of the iliac stent failures have been due to failure to place the stent high enough in the cava.  e double barrel or kissing stent con guration requires extension of the two stents well above the bifur­cation to maintain patency. Also, simultaneous balloon dilatation is recommended to avoid compressing a stent (Figure56.20).
Figure56.18 Deployment of a self-expanding stent in a very tight lesion
can result in “watermelon seed” slippage, as seen in this image. Short tight lesions require longer stents to prevent this complication.
Figure56.19 Dramatic contrast image of an iatrogenic caval tear and
retroperitoneal extravasation.  e two stents are not su ciently overlapped. Care is taken not to oversize dilating balloons and to perform kissing balloon technique in the parallel caval stents. An uneven force was applied to the cava and stents and resulted in this perforation, which was treated e ectively with a coveredstent.
ENDOVASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF ILIOCAVAL THROMBOSIS • 477