Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3829_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
14 Мб
Скачать
☆
With growing popularity of sclerotherapy di erent tech-
https://t.me/med1917
9
niques have been developed.
Results, however, were o en unsatisfactory. In 1981 Cockett summarized main causes of failure in perforator injection as (1) inability to accurately locate the perforator, (2)potential damage by extravascular injection of sclerosant, (3)potential damage to posterior tibial artery, and (4)potential damage to deep veins causingDVT.
10
Advances in ultrasound imaging in the 1980s and 1990s provided the technical basis for ultrasound-guided proce­dures. At the same time, reliable identi cation of perforating veins not only became possible but also was integrated into
11
standard diagnostic protocols.
Together with new scleros­ing agents, which can be e ectively used in signi cantly lower concentrations with less damage to extravascular tissues, these advances helped to overcome the de ciencies of con­ventional sclerotherapy of perforating veins. By the late 1990s ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (USGS) became popular in European countries and made its way to the United States.
12–15
Figure54.1 Perforating vessels.  e perforating artery (Perf A) is located next to the perforating vein (Perf V) at the fascial opening.
BASIC CONSIDERATIONS
To perform echosclerotherapy of lower extremity perfo­rating veins, a thorough knowledge of their anatomy and physiopathology is necessary. Perforator veins connect the super cial to the deep venous system and to the venous sinuses within the leg muscles.  ese veins usually contain a series of bicuspid valves, located in their subfascial segment, which prevent transmission of high pressure from the deep venous system into the super cial veins.  e distribution of medial perforating veins connecting the super cial and deep systems in the calf and thigh is relatively constant. However, the number and anatomy of the numerous perforators to the muscular venous sinuses is unpredictable. Perforating veins are accompanied by perforating arteries supplying the skin and, sometimes, by cutaneous nerve branches and lymphatic vessels. Perforating arteries are usually smaller in diameter and located superior to the accompanied vein.
16
 e presence of these arteries can o en be con rmed by
17
duplex scan
(see Figure54.1).
 e coexistence of perforating veins and arteries in the lower extremities was described  rst by Robert Linton, who established that “communicating” pedicles have venous and arterial components. He also described how these ves­sels run along the intermuscular fascial planes and noted that “the arteries are so small that it is not necessary to preserve them.” Identi cation of the perforating arter­ies, although not always possible, becomes desirable when ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of perforating veins is per­formed. Accidental injection of sclerosing agent into the arterial bed may possibly cause complications such as skin necrosis, and can be prevented by visual control, or by per­forming injections at a distance from the fascial opening where the perforating artery and vein are not in such close proximity to each other.  e role of perforator arteries in
pathogenesis of venous ulcers and sanogenesis a er treat­ment is yet to be studied. As they provide blood supply to skin areas a ected by venous disease, preservation of these vascular structures during treatment may be desirable. Our observations indicate that blood  ow in perforating arteries
17
increases a er USGS.
If this hyperemia can be shown to be bene cial in ulcer healing, selective oblation of perforator veins by USGS could be more desirable than surgical inter­ruption when both veins and arteries are interrupted.  e same logic may be applied to perforating cutaneous nerves.
Perforator vein incompetence usually is associated with deep and/or super cial venous incompetence, but, if le untreated, can persist a er successful treatment of saphenous re ux. Strong association of perforator incompetence with skin changes and ulceration has been well established, however, incompetent perforators are o en present in less advanced stages of the disease, when their role in disease progression and/or recurrence of varicose veins is less obvious. Following the cases of persistent perforator veins a er correction of other sources of re ux at Straub Clinic revealed association of patients’ symptoms with isolated incompetent perforators, and relief of these symptoms a er successful USGS.  ese  ndings and variations in anatomy support identi cation of not only perforator veins in areas of skin changes but also all those potentially clinically important as a treatment target.
Incompetent perforating veins 4 to 7mm in diameter can be treated with this technique. Smaller veins seldom are incompetent, and larger veins require larger volumes of scle­rosant, which potentially increases the risk of complications.
CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Indications for USGS are not di erent from indications to surgical interruption of perforating veins. Cases of symp­tomatic chronic venous disease from C2 to C6 clinical class
458 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
(CEAP) that have demonstrable incompetent perforating
https://t.me/med1917
veins at duplex ultrasound constitute the majority of indi­cations. In primary disease, USGS can be performed at the time of initial treatment of saphenous re ux, or as a sepa­rate stage. In secondary (postthrombotic) disease, careful consideration should be given to the pathophysiologic role of incompetent perforators in each individual extremity. Incompetent perforators can constitute a major out ow track around an obstructed segment in some cases and be a contributor to skin ulceration in others.
USGS does not require anesthesia and can be performed
in the o ce as well as in the operatingroom.
Patients with known allergic reactions to sclerotherapy agents, or who are pregnant or lactating should be excluded.  e presence of severe arterial occlusive disease or active vasculitis is also a contraindication as inadvertent intraarte­rial injection potentially can result in limbloss.
SCLEROSINGAGENTS
Sodium tetradecyl sulfate (Sotradecol) and sodium mor­rhuate are the agents frequently used for therapy of incom­petent perforating veins. Polidocanol (Aethoxysklerol) is another valid drug for this purpose still awaiting FDA approval in the United States.
 e mechanism of action of all these drugs is based on their detergent properties. Immediately a er injection the endothelial cells in contact with the drug undergo swelling and disruption.  is irreversible trauma causes localized thrombosis, vasospasm, and then vein  brosis and reabsorp­tion. Larger veins should be treated with increased con­centrations rather than larger volumes, since the latter may cause escape of the drug into the deep veins and potentially into the systemic venous circulation.
Recent development of foam sclerotherapy opens new opportunities for treatment of perforating veins. In addi­tion to di erent sclerosing agents and their concentra­tions, the use of foam introduces variability in type of gas, gas-to-liquid ratio, time between processing and use, size of the bubbles, and methods of preparation.  is vari­ability complicates analysis of results and development of guidelines. Until the standardization of sclerosing foams is developed, foam sclerotherapy continues to be based on the experience and preferences of a treating physician.
PREOPERATIVEDUPLEX
Duplex ultrasound scan plays the most important role in evaluation of the patient before USGS. Complete exami­nation of deep and super cial venous systems including testing for obstruction and valvular incompetence is neces­sary in every case. Perforating veins should be identi ed by scanning all aspects of the calf and by following the course of the great saphenous vein (GSV), the vein of Giacomini,
or any incompetent nonsaphenous vein of the thigh. It is preferable to examine patients in a standing position, as the increased hydrostatic pressure makes perforating veins easier to visualize and evaluate. Incompetence of a perforat­ing vein can be determined by registering of reversed  ow (directed to the super cial veins) longer than 0.4 seconds, or by the size of the vein at the fascial opening exceeding
11,18
3.5mm, or by the presence of both criteria. In addition to identi cation of incompetent perfora-
tor veins, ultrasound provides information on which veins are connected by these perforators, and thus allocates each perforator to a de ned place in the hemodynamic map of the venous system of the a ected extremity. At the time of duplex scan, incompetent perforating veins located in the areas of skin changes and ulcers, those connected with corona phlebectatica, or clusters of varicose veins, and those associated with symptoms should be separated from perfo­rators found in asymptomatic limbs, and from those with a questionable hemodynamic role in the disease process.  is information is crucial for development of a surgical plan and for a decision on how to treat each of the incompetent perforators.
TECHNIQUE
 e procedure can be performed under general or local anesthesia during saphenous and varicose vein ablation, or as an isolated procedure in the outpatient clinic setting. When performed as a stand- alone procedure, no sedation or local anesthesia is required.
 e procedure room is warmed to a comfortable tem-
perature in order to avoid venous constriction, and the patient is positioned in the supine or prone position, depending on the location of veins to be treated.  e skin is prepped with iodine solution, and a sterile latex cover is applied to the ultrasound probe.  is must be oriented lon­gitudinally, and a er the target vein is identi ed, a 25-gauge needle connected to a 3-cc syringe is inserted into the skin close to the ultrasound transducer.  e needle tip has to be oriented toward the perforating vein, along the sagittal plane of the probe.  e target for the injection is the seg­ment of perforating vein above the fascia (see Figure54.2A). Asmall amount of venous blood is withdrawn in the syringe to con rm the correct position of the needle, and 1 to 2 cc of 1% sodium tetradecyl sulfate, or 5% sodium morrhuate is injected under duplex vision.  e sclerosing agent can be easily seen by B-mode ultrasound imaging, thus monitoring each injection with ultrasound provides vital information regarding the precision of injection and volume of scle­rosant needed to be injected to close the perforator, but not to cause damage of deep veins. Pain during injection, among other causes, can indicate that a perforating artery has been punctured, and therefore injection should be stopped to avoid serious complications.
USGS OF PERFORATING VEINS IN CHRONIC INSUFFICIENCY • 459
https://t.me/med1917
Figure54.2 Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of the perforating vein. (A) e needle is placed in a vein above the fascia (F). (B)A er an injection the perforating vein (PV) is  lled with an echogenic material and has no  ow.
 e needle is withdrawn and compression applied for a few minutes.  e vein is reimaged, and sclerotherapy is considered successful if no residual  ow is observed in the treated perforator (see Figure54.2A).
Larger veins can be treated by foam sclerotherapy. With this technique conventional sclerosing agent and air are mixed in order to form  ne bubbles.  e principle behind this method is that by displacing blood from the treated vein and increasing the contact time between the sclerosant and the vein more e ective treatment can be achieved.
P O S T O P E R A T I V E  C A R E
External compression is important for e ective sclero­therapy. Even a er a successful injection, inadequate com­pression of the treated area may allow blood  ow through a damaged, thrombogenic endothelium, and so thrombo­phlebitis may develop at that site. Furthermore, adequate compression may improve the calf muscle pump, thus preventing propagation of thrombus into the deep veins. Recurrences may be due to inadequate initial or subsequent continuous compression until a  brous occlusion occurs. Elastic bandages are applied to the extremity and main­tained for 1 to 2 weeks and replaced by classII-III knee-high compression stockings therea er. Patients with heavy elastic bandages should be warned to remove them should pain occur, before ischemia has caused any damage. Patients are encouraged to ambulate in order to prevent venous stasis that may lead to deep venous thrombosis.
R E S U L T S
Although available reports on results of USGS consistently demonstrate bene ts of this treatment modality, their con­clusions should be taken with caution.
12–13,15,19–22
Important di erences between USGS and surgical inter­ruption of perforating veins should be considered when clinical results of perforating vein treatment are analyzed.
 e true minimally invasive nature of USGS translates into minimal impact on patients’ immediate posttreatment activity and quality of life. Early unrestricted ambulation can be a contributing factor for the treatment outcome.
Any surgical procedure, including SEPS, results in in ammation followed by scar formation in the area of the treated perforator.  e impact of these processes on an extremity with CVI has not been de ned, but presents theoretical possibilities either for prevention of development or recurrent perforators. On the one hand, postoperative scars may act as a mechanical barrier against reconnection of the deep and super cial systems, but on the other hand, postoperative in ammation might promote neovasculariza­tion, thus recurrence of perforators. In the case of USGS, the vein remains in place, therefore its recanalization is possible. Availability of information on objective documentation of immediate treatment success, and di erentiation between reopening of treated perforator and development of new ves­sels can signi cantly impact interpretation of publisheddata.
Utilization of di erent sclerosing agents in a variety of concentrations with di erences in e ects on the vein and surrounding tissue contributes to the complexity of inter­pretation of reported results.
Waiting for a higher level of evidence on USGS success, and for more precise de nitions of outcome measures, one can rely only on clinical experience of groups and individuals performing a high volume of these procedures.  e Straub clinic group performed over 3,000 injections of incom-
15,19–21
petent perforators in the early 2000s.
Immediate successful obliteration of the treated veins at the time of injection was obtained in 98% of cases. Skin complica­tions with super cial skin necrosis occurred in six patients. Recurrence, de ned as the presence of  ow in a previously sclerosed perforating vein at duplex follow-up, was present in 23% of cases with a mean follow-up of 17months. Venous clinical severity scores decreased on average from 11.95 pre­treatment to 6.5 posttreatment (p < 0.05). Likewise, venous disability scores dropped from 1.86 pretreatment to 0.81 posttreatment (p < 0.05). Perforator recurrence was more common in limbs with ulcerations. Except for the rare
460 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
occurrence of skin necrosis, cosmetic results were excellent,
https://t.me/med1917
o en with partial reversal of preexisting skin changes, and relief of symptoms.
C O M P L I C A T I O N S
Sclerotherapy of perforating veins is associated with minimal discomfort and pain and thus does not require local or gen­eral anesthesia. Occurrence of immediate or delayed pain at the site of injection or in a larger calf region should alert the operator against extravascular injection in the so tissue or in a nearby artery. Intraarterial injection is extremely painful, whereas extravasation in the subcutaneous tissue may remain asymptomatic, unless the sclerosant solution had been mixed with normal saline, or a high concentration of sclerosant had been used. As a result of extravasation, super cial skin necrosis may occur. In our experience super cial skin necro­sis occurred in less than 2% of patients, and usually resolved with minimal sequelae in a matter of weeks. Amore serious complication is intraarterial injection, as this produces a dif­fuse endotheliitis blocking the arterioles, which may lead to tissue ischemia and gangrene. Should this complication occur, injection of procaine around the injected artery, local cooling, systemic heparinization, and infusion with low molecular weight dextran are recommended.
As discussed previously, a potential complication of inad­equate compression is thrombophlebitis, because residual  ow within a damaged vein predisposes to thrombosis of the vein and eventual recanalization. DVT, also rare, is probably due to injection of large volumes of sclerosant. Again, if scle­rosing agents are injected in small amounts, only the intima, not the blood, should be a ected.  ese agents are inacti­vated rapidly by the blood and are, paradoxically, hemolytic and not thrombotic. Another important point to stress is that patients must be encouraged to walk immediately a er treatment and must continue this every day to prevent stag­nant blood from collecting in the damagedveins.
It would be prudent to avoid injecting limbs of patients with known congenital or acquired prothrombotic state (bedridden, neoplastic, early postthrombosis).
Another possible, although rare, serious complication is anaphylactic shock. While performing injection sclerother­apy, all the necessary equipment to handle this situation must be readily available (oxygen, epinephrine, and steroids) as this could be a life-threatening event. We have not observed this complication during perforating vein sclerotherapy.
C O N C L U S I O N
Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy is a minimally invasive, alternative technique for the treatment of incompetent calf perforating veins. If a rigorous technique and careful precautions are undertaken, minimal complication rates
and satisfactory clinical results can be achieved. A er sclerotherapy, patients can resume their routine activities and return to work, and this is without doubt one of the most appealing aspects of this method. We believe that the adoption of this technique in experienced hands poten­tially could represent the standard method of treating incompetent perforators, as it is associated with minimal discomfort for the patient, acceptable recurrence rates, and is easily repeatable.  ese results are encouraging, but future research should de ne precise indications, optimal techniques, and measures for clinical and hemodynamic success for this procedure.
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Caggiati E , Mendoza M .  e discovery of perforating veins , Ann Vasc Surg . 2004 . 18 ( 4 ): 502–503 .
2 . H om a n s J .  e operative treatment of varicose veins and ulcers,
based upon a classi cation of these lesions , Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1916 . 22 : 143–158 .
3. Hauer G , Barkun J , Wisser I , Deiler S . Endoscopic subfascial discis­sion of perforating veins , Surg Endosc . 1988 . 2 ( 1 ): 5–12 .
4. Gloviczki P , Cambria RA , Rhee RY , Canton LG , McKusick MA . Surgical technique and preliminary results of endoscopic subfascial division of perforating veins, J Vasc Surg . 1996 . 23 ( 3 ): 517–523 .
5. Rhodes JM , Gloviczki P , Canton LG , Rooke T , Lewis BD , Lindsey JR . Factors a ecting clinical outcome following endoscopic perfora­tor vein ablation, Am J Surg . 1998 . 176 ( 2 ): 162–167 .
6. Gloviczki P , Bergan JJ , Rhodes JM , Canton LG , Harmsen S , Ilstrup DM . Midterm results of endoscopic perforator vein interruption for chronic venous Insu ciency:Lessons learned from the North American subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery registry:  e North American Study Group , J Vasc Surg . 1999 . 29 ( 3 ): 489–502 .
7. Fegan WG . Continuous compression technique for injecting veins , Lancet . 1963 . 2 : 109–112 .
8 . F eg a n WG .  e treatment of varicose veins by injection sclerother-
apy , Edizioni Minerva Medica . 1979 .
9. Goor W . Sclerotherapy of incompetent perforating veins. In: May R , Partsch H , Staubesand J , eds. Perforating veins . Munich, Germany:Urban & Schwarzenberg.1981 .
10. Cockett F . Techniques of operations on perforating veins. In: May R , Partsch H , Staubesand J , eds. Perforating veins . Munich, Germany:Urban & Schwarzenberg.1981.
11. Labropoulos N , Tiongson J , Pryor L , et al. De nition of venous re ux in lower extremity veins , J Vasc Surg . 2003 . 38 ( 4 ): 793–798 .
12. Guex JJ . Ultrasound guided sclerotherapy (USGS) for perforating veins (PV), Hawaii Med J . 2000 . 59 : 261–262 .
13.  ibault PK , Lewis WA . Recurrent varicose veins:Part2:Injection of incompetent perforating veins using ultrasound guidance , J Derm Surg Onc. 1992 . 18 : 895–900 .
14. Schadeck M . Sclerotherapie des perforantes jambieres , Phlebologie . 1997 . 50 ( 4 ): 683–688 .
15. Puggioni A , Lurie F , Masuda E , Eklof B , Kistner R . Ultrasound-guided
sclerotherapy of incompetent perforators: Technique and duplex follow-up. Paci c Vascular Symposium on Venous Disease, Kona,
Hawaii, November, 2002 .
16. Ghali S , Bowman N , Khan U .  e distal medial perforators of the lower leg and their accompanying veins , Br J Plast Surg . 2005 . 58 (8):1086–1089.
17. Lurie F , Kessler D , Puggioni A , Masuda E . Blood  ow in perforat­ing arteries can change a er oblation of incompetent perforating veins:Preliminary ultrasound observations:6th European American Congress on Venous Diseases , Prague, Czech Republic , May 2005, Praktika  ebologie . 2005 . 14 ( 2 ): 55–56 .
USGS OF PERFORATING VEINS IN CHRONIC INSUFFICIENCY • 461
18. Sandri JL , Barros FS , Pontes S , Jacques C , Salles- Cunha SX .
https://t.me/med1917
Diameter-re ux relationship in perforating veins of patients with varicose veins , J Vasc Surg. 1999 . 30 ( 5 ): 867–875 .
19. Masuda EM , Kessler DM , Puggioni A , Lurie F , Kistner RL , Eklof B .  e e ect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of incompetent per­forator veins on venous clinical severity and disability scores , J Vasc Surg. 2006 . 43 ( 3 ): 551–556 .
20. Puggioni A , Lurie F , Masuda E , Kistner R , Eklof B . Ambulatory treat-
ment of chronic venous disease with ultrasound guided sclerotherapy
of perforating veins . Society for Clinical Vascular Surgery, 31st
Symposium , Miami, Florida, March, 2003 .
21. Eklof B , Kessler D , Kistner R , etal. Can duplex-guided sclerotherapy replace SEPS in the treatment of incompetent perforating veins? Veith Symposium , NewYork, NewYork , November 20–23 , 2003 .
22. de Waard MM , der Kinderen DJ . Duplex ultrasonography-guided foam sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins in a patient with bilateral venous leg ulcers , Dermatol Surg . 2005 . 31 ( 5 ): 580–583 .
462 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
55.
https://t.me/med1917
PERFORATINGVEINS
John J. Bergan , Luigi Pascarella and Nisha Bunke-Paquette
INTRODUCTION
 e development of ankle hyperpigmentation, edema, atrophie blanche, and incipient ulceration, the cutaneous trophic changes of chronic venous insu ciency (CVI), is
1
linked to a complex microangiopathy.
 is, on a macro­vascular level is linked to ambulatory venous hypertension, which is enhanced by super cial and deep re ux. Also, it is linked to a lesser extent to venous obstruction.  us it appears that venous hypertension is the fundamental patho-
2
genic factor that leads toCVI.
VALVE REMODELING PRODUCES
DISTAL VENOUS HYPERTENSION
Our observations on ultrasound-proven, re uxing saphe­nous veins have shown that the endothelium of their venous valves and vein walls contain an in ltration of monocytes and an associated increased expression of intercellular adhe­sion molecules (ICAM-1).  ere is a statistically signi cant spatial correlation between CD68-positive monocytes and ICAM-1 in the various tissue areas of the valves and the
3
vein walls.
 e leukocytes and the expression of adhesion molecules are concentrated more on the proximal venous wall and valve cusp than on the distal wall and lea et.  is suggests a cause and e ect relationship with venous hypertension.
 e altered hemodynamics that accompany the venous hypertension change the plasma sheer stress, which, in turn, stimulates leukocyte pseudopod projection and adhesion of the leukocytes to the endothelium. It is a reduction, not an increase, in shear stress that leads to adhesion of the white
4
cells on the endothelium.
Adhesion of the cells is followed by migration through the endothelium and interstitial mac­rophage in ltration.
 e microscopic alterations, linked to venous hyper­tension described earlier are accompanied by gross tissue changes, which result in valve incompetency. Observations of these changes in primary venous insu ciency reveal
dilation of the valvular annulus, atrophy of the cusp, and  brotic remodeling of the valve and its annulus. Some have proposed that hemodynamic mechanical injury increases
5
tissue damage to the annulus and cusps.
Others suggest that activated leukocytes release transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β tein production.
) gene expression, which alters environmental pro-
1
6
 is might explain the gross observations
seen in a ected valves.
V E N O U S S T A S I S :  A N
INAPPROPRIAT ETERM
Although the term “chronic venous insu ciency” (CVI) is in common usage and is becoming increasingly visible, the older term, “venous stasis” remains dominant.  is is a tribute to John Homans of Harvard, who introduced the concept that venous stasis was the ultimate cause of venous ulceration.
Homans believed that there was a causal relation
between venous ulcerations of the legs and blood stasis in
7
patients with severe chronic venous insu ciency.
Blood stasis, as proposed by Homans, was determined by a short­age of oxygen content in the skin, and it was this that led to a condition of tissue hypoxia, necrosis, and ulceration. Many observations in the last quarter century have dem­onstrated that shortage of oxygen is not the main cause of venous ulcers.
It has been hypothesized that presence of cutaneous arteriovenous  stulas might cause a deprivation of oxy­gen by shunting oxygenated blood away from skin already hypoxic from stasis. Such arteriovenous connections are eas-
8
ily demonstrated
by arteriography and microdissection in
limbs with severe CVI but are not thought to contribute to
9
the skin changes.
Coleridge Smith and others have shown
that the content of oxygen in the skin and in varicose veins
10
of limbs with venous ulcers is not decreased. gen content in varicose veins is increased.
In fact, oxy-
11
In addition, the oxygen di usion defects suspected by histological  ndings of pericapillary  brin cu s have been refuted. Studies such
1
7
463
as clearance of Xenon133 through liposclerotic skin have
https://t.me/med1917
12
shown no signi cant oxygen barrier.
PREULCERATIVE CUTANEOUS
CHANGES
In ammation dominates the early skin changes that pre­cede venous ulceration. Increased leukocyte activation and an increased expression of soluble adhesion molecules have been demonstrated.  ere is a perivascular in ltration of the papillary plexus capillaries. Granulation tissue composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, histiocytes, and  broblasts invades the subepithelial layer.  is granulation tissue is responsible for the deposition of collagen  bers.
13
Collagen  bers appear to have completely lost their normal orientation in the cutaneous tissue.  ese lesions account for the in ammatory and postin ammatory process of tis­sue  brosclerosis:lipodermatosclerosis.
When skin at the border of CVI is compared to nor­mal skin in the same individual, the strong expression of ICAM-1 is seen in addition to a dense in ltration by T lym­phocytes and macrophages. In some instances, the tissue also
14
is in ltrated by an increased number of mast cells.
 is is the typical picture of a chronic in ammatory reaction with an upregulation of endothelial adhesion molecules and der­mal in ltration by T lymphocytes and macrophages in the skin of patients withCVI.
THE PERFORATINGVEINS
Incompetent perforating veins are strongly associated with super cial venous re ux, and it is still controversial whether incompetent perforating veins are the primary cause of skin changes of chronic venous insu ciency or whether
the incompetent perforating veins and skin changes are the result of super cial re ux.  e cause of valvular dysfunc­tion in perforating veins is not yet fully understood (see Figure55.1).
15
Despite the classic studies of Linton
and Cockett, 16 it is still not known what the exact role of incompetent perfo­rating veins is in the development of venous ulceration. Our observations suggest that venous hypertension is closely associated with valve damage and remodeling, which pro-
17
duces subsequent valve incompetence.
 erefore, it is use-
ful to relate these  ndings to the valves in perforatingveins.
It is well known that muscle contraction produces
muscular compartment pressures in the range of 100mm
18
mercury and higher. could initiate the cascade of molecular events, which even-
Such pressures exerted over time
tuate in valvular incompetence.  is valve incompetence would then produce the cutaneous “blow out” described as “spherical dilatations on veins under the skin” by Dodd
19
and Cockett.
Failure of perforating vein valves due to their remodeling caused by repetitive compartment pressure ele­vation induced by normal exercise would lead to the skin changes described earlier.
A NEW HYPOTHESIS
A useful hypothesis is that venous hypertension, caused by super cial re ux and calf compartment pressure, is trans­mitted to unsupported venules of the skin. It is this sum of gravitational and hemodynamic pressure that stimulates the skin changes of chronic venous insu ciency. If this is true, a large component of ankle venous hypertension emanates from normal calf exercise with calf compartment pressures transmitted directly through the incompetent perforating vein valves to the skin (see Figure55.2).
AB
Figure55.1 ( A)  is ultrasound scan image shows an incompetent perforating vein penetrating the deep fascia and re uxing into the GSV. It is calf muscle contraction that provides the pressure that is transmitted through a failed valve and elongates and dilates the super cial vein. (B) e IPV in this image is dilated and measures 7.8mm in diameter.
464 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
https://t.me/med1917
Figure55.2  is perforating vein is shown penetrating the deep fascia. Its outward  ow is demonstrated best by compression of distal so tissues.
Indirect evidence of the importance of perforator veins
in venous ulceration comes from surgical experience in
20
dividing perforating veins in treatment of CVI.
Ashorter
ulcer healing time and improved hemodynamics have been
21
found in limbs subjected to perforating vein surgery.
De Palma showed in a crossover study that failure of conservative care, mainly consisting of compression, could be reversed by intervention with division of perforating
22
 is report, much like others, 23 is confused by the
veins. fact that 70% of the limbs had simultaneous stripping of the long saphenous vein at the time of perforator vein inter­ruption. In fact, the sum of these two maneuvers did reduce venous hypertensive microangiopathy.
As ancient theories of causation of CVI gradually have been disproven as indicated earlier, it is no longer thought that venous blood stasis or ischemia due to arteriovenous  stulas,  brin cu development, or leukocyte trappings are important. Instead, a more logical explanation of the skin changes of chronic venous insu ciency is credible (see Table55.1).
In development of the severe changes of CVI,  rst, venous hypertension and super cial venous valve failure
21
are linked.
Sequential venous valve failure may be cen­trifugal or centripital.  is allows venous hypertension to be transmitted to the ankle by super cial re ux. Next, perforating vein valves fail through the same mechanisms of venous hypertension-induced valve remodeling. Or, per­forating veins acting as part of the private re ux recircula­tion can enlarge to the point of valvular incompetence
22
(see Figure55.3).
Subsequent to perforating vein valve failure, subcutane-
ous changes of in ammation are produced by the in amma-
14
tory process,
and these lead to the clinical manifestations
of chronic venous insu ciency.
As suggested previously, therapy of CVI supports this hypothesis. Compression treatment reduces ambula­tory venous pressure and is e ective in healing venous leg
Table55.1 HYPOTHESES EXPLAINING GENESIS OF ADVANCED CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
1 . S up e r  cial vein valve incompetence* raises distal venous pressure.
2. Perforating vein valve incompetence** raises distal venous pressure.
3 . A d d it i v e e  ects of super cial and perforator incompetence
produce profound distal venous hypertension.
4. Venous hypertension produces venulectasia, edema, leukocyte­endothelial interaction, and the in ammatory response.
5 . I n  ammation produces hyperpigmentation,  brosis, and
ulceration.
*Due to gravitational re ux induced valve remodeling.
**Due to muscle compartment pressure induced valve remodeling.
ulcers. 24 Super cial vein surgery reduces ambulatory venous pressure, allows healing of venous leg ulcer, and reduces the
25
e ects of CVI.
Perforator vein interruption by the Linton
or endoscopic techniques reduces ambulatory venous pres-
26,27
sure and ameliorates the chronic changes of CVI.
EXIT AND REENTRY
PERFORATINGVEINS
 ere are two fundamental facts that confuse understand­ing of perforating veins.  e  rst relates to  ow direction. Some perforating veins produce abnormal out ow from deep circulation to super cial circulation.  is is dem­onstrated in Figure55.1.  is can be termed “perforating vein re ux.” Other perforating veins demonstrate normal  ow from the super cial system to the deep system.  is is shown in the diagram of Figure55.3 and the duplex scan shown in Figure55.4. In situations of super cial venous incompetence and re ux, these can be called reentry per­forating veins. It was Hach who understood this best, as he described the private circulation of re ux in super cial veins reentering to the deep system and the deep system in turn
24
re uxing into the super cial veins.
It is most likely that it is the reentry perforating veins that disappear a er adequately performed super cial venous stripping.
Another confusing factor in relating perforating veins to venous ulceration is the fact that venous ulceration is not directly related to severity of hemodynamic changes.  e lower limbs in a patient with bilaterally severe varicose veins might appear to be identical and might have identical hemodynamic measurements, but one limb might have all the stigmata of CVI and the other might have none.  is
caused by the venous hypertension or other hemodynamic changes but instead are dependent on leukocyte activation and the subsequent molecular changes that follow. In the absence of leukocyte activation, skin changes do notoccur.
However, it may very well be that perforating vein out­ ow or re ux as detected by color  ow Doppler duplex on
25
PERFORATINGVEINS • 465
https://t.me/med1917
Figure55.3 Normal perforating vein blood  ow is from the super cial to the deep venous system. When saphenous vein re ux and varicose veins are present, the direction of  ow is normal, but the perforating veins that allow reentry of re ux  ow may enlarge and become incompetent as shown in this diagram.
(From Reference 27, with permission.)
release of distal compression creates the hypertension in the subcutaneous venular network that elongates and dilates the capillaries, enlarges the intercellular junctions, produces edema, and triggers the in ammatory reaction that causes the skin changes.
If this is proven to be true, observations on the e ­cacy of measures to reduce cutaneous hypertension such as e ective compression, super cial venous re ux ablation
26
by foam sclerotherapy,
and perforator vein interruption will rest on a  rm foundation. Even e ective pharmaco­logical intervention to moderate leukocyte activation is foreseeable.
C O N C L U S I O N S
Perforating veins and severe CVI are linked, and descrip­tions of molecular events associated with venous hyperten­sion explain the relationship.  ese validate current medical and surgical therapy and point the way toward more e ec­tive and less cumbersome treatments in the future.
Figure55.4  is reentry perforating vein has become tortuous because of increased  ow. Distal compression causes its inward directed  ow to stop.  is resumes a er distal compression release.
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Carpentier PH . Leukocytes in chronic venous insu ciency [in French], J Mal Vasc . 1998 . 23 : 274–276 .
2. Haenen JH , Janssen MCH , van Langen H, etal.  e postthrom­botic syndrome in relation to venous hemodynamics as measured by means of duplex scanning and strain-gauge plethysmography , J Vasc Surg . 1999 . 29 : 1071–1076 .
3. Takase S , Bergan JJ , Schmid-Schönbein GW . Expression of adhe­sion molecules and cytokines on saphenous veins in chronic venous insu ciency , Ann Vasc Surg . 2000 . 14 : 427–435 .
4. Moazzam F , DeLano FA , Zweifach BW, etal.  e leukocyte response to  uid stress , Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 1997 . 94 : 5338–5343 .
5. Corcos L , DeAnna D , Dini M, etal. Proximal long saphenous vein valves in primary venous insufficiency, J Mal Vasc . 2000 . 25 : 27–36 .
6. Hahn J , Junger M , Friedrich B, etal. Cutaneous in ammation lim­ited to the region of the ulcer in chronic venous insu ciency , VA S A . 1997 . 26 : 277–281 .
7 . H o m a n s J .  e etiology and treatment of varicose ulcer of the leg ,
Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1917 . 24 : 300–311 .
8. Brewer AC . Arteriovenous shunts , Br Med J . 1950 . 2 : 270–273 .
9. Schalin , L . Arteriovenous communication to varicose veins in the lower extremities studied by dynamic angiography , Acta Chir Scand . 1980 . 146 : 397–406 .
10. Shami SK , Sarin S , Cheatle TR , Scurr JH , Coleridge Smith PD .
Venous ulcers and the super cial venous system , J Vasc Surg . 1993 . 17 : 487–490 .
11. Blalock , A . Oxygen content of blood in patients with varicose veins ,
Arch Surg . 1929 . 19 : 898–904 .
12. Coleridge Smith PD . Pathogenesis of varicose veins and the chronic
venous insu ciency syndrome. In: Goldman MP , Weiss RA , Bergan J J , e d s . Varicose veins and telangiectasias:Diagnosis and management . St. Louis, MO: uality Medical.  1998 .
13. Pappas PJ , You R , Rameshwar P, et al. Dermal tissue  brosis in
patients with chronic venous insu ciency is associated with increased transforming growth factor-β1 gene expression and pro­tein production , J Vasc Surg . 1999 . 30 : 1129–1145 .
14. Scott HJ , Coleridge Smith PD , Scurr JH . Histological study of
white blood cells and their association with lipodermatosclerosis and venous ulceration , Br J Surg . 1991 . 78 : 210–211 .
466 • CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY
15. Linton RR .  e postthrombotic ulceration of the lower extrem-
https://t.me/med1917
ity: Its etiology and surgical treatment , Ann Surg . 1953 . 138 : 415–432 .
16. Cockett FB .  e patholog y and treatment of venous ulcers of the leg, Br J Surg . 1955 . 43 : 260–278 .
17. Schmid-Schönbein GW , Takase S , Bergan JJ . New advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of chronic venous insu ­ciency , Angiology . 2001 . 52 ( Suppl 1 ): S27–S34 .
18. Arnoldi CC . Physiology and pathophysiology of the venous pump of the calf. In: Eklöf B , Gjöres JE ,  ulesius O , Bergqvist D , eds. Controversies in the management of venous disorders . London : Butterworths . 1989 . 11 .
19. Dodd H , Cockett FB .  e pathology and surgery of the veins of the lower limb . Edinburgh and London ; E&S Livingstone . 1956 . 344 .
20. Gloviczki P , Bergan JJ , Rhodes JM, et al. Mid-term results of endoscopic perforator vein interruption for chronic venous insuf­ ciency:Lessons learned from the North American subfascial endo­scopic perforator surgery registry , J Vasc Surg . 1999 . 29 . 489–502 .
21. Rhodes JM , Gloviczki P , Canton L, etal. Endoscopic perforator vein division with ablation of super cial re ux improves venous hemody­namics , J Vasc Surg. 1998 . 28 : 839–847 .
22. DePalma RG , Kowallek DL . Venous ulceration: A crossover study from nonoperative to operative treatment , J Vasc Surg . 1996 . 24 : 788–792 .
23. Tawes RL , Barron ML , Coello AA , Joyce DH , Kolvenbach R . Optimal therapy for advanced chronic venous insu ciency , J Vasc Surg . 2003 . 37 : 545–551 .
24. Hach W . Die rezirkulationskreise der primren varicose , Phlebologie . 1991 . 20 : 81–84 .
25. Nicolaides AN , Hussein MK , Szendro G, et al.  e relation of venous ulceration with ambulatory venous pressure measurements , J Vasc Surg . 1993 . 17 : 414–419 .
26. Bergan JJ , Pascarella L . Severe CVI:Primary treatment with sclero­foam , Sem Vasc Surg . 2005 . 18 : 49–57 .
27. Tibbs DJ . Varicose veins and related disorders . Oxford : Butterworth-Heineman . 1992 .
PERFORATINGVEINS • 467