Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5824_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
196
D.W. Stovall and M.W. Austin
the resection of larger hydrosalpinges (i.e., those that are visible by ultrasound). When the removal of these larger hydrosalpinges were specifi cally evaluated, a pregnancy rate hazards ratio of 3.8 (95 % CI, 1.5–9.2) was found. Therefore, it appears that the assessment of hydrosalpinges by ultrasound may help clini­cians to determine which patients may benefi t the most from salpingectomy.
Other types of treatments for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF include salpingostomy and antibiotic therapy. Each of these therapies has specifi c advantages. Salpingostomy allows one to drain the hydrosalpinx fl uid and to preserve the fallo­pian tube. Therefore, this procedure may not only improve pregnancy rates with IVF, but may also improve fertility without the assistance of IVF. Of course, fallopian tubes treated in this manner may re-accumulate with fl uid making the proce­dure somewhat less desirable in patients who are only planning to undergo IVF. Furthermore, although one study has shown this procedure to increase pregnancy rates with IVF to a similar level as that seen after salpingectomy, more data are needed to determine its true effectiveness [ 26 ]. In addition, there are data to demonstrate that the administration of doxycycline both before and after oocyte retrieval may increase pregnancy rates specifi cally in women with tubal occlusion. However, these data are very prelimi­nary, whether or not antibiotic therapy is truly effi cacious for the improvement of pregnancy with IVF in women with hydrosalpinges is not known. In conclusion, it appears that either sal­pingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion yields the best pregnancy rates with IVF in women with hydrosalpinges and that the patients who may benefi t most from this procedure are those whose hydrosalpinges are large enough to be seen by ultrasound. If a patient is not a surgical candidate, it makes sense to use pre- and post-oocyte retrieval doxycycline therapy as an alternative. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion with a sterilization device is another option, but further study is needed before this procedure can be rec­ommended prior to IVF.

Conclusions

The fallopian tubes serve several important steps in the reproductive process including oocyte pickup, gamete transportation, fertil­ization, and early embryonic development and transfer. However, the fallopian tubes are vul­nerable to damage from both infectious and infl ammatory processes. When the distal end of a fallopian tube is completely blocked and the tube fi lls with fl uid, it is referred to as a hydrosalpinx. Using specifi c criteria, hydro­salpinges can be readily diagnosed via ultra­sound imaging. The presence of a hydrosalpinx(s) has a signifi cant effect on one’s chances for pregnancy. Bilateral hydro­salpinges result in sterility. In good prognostic cases, surgical intervention can signifi cantly improve the chances for successful intrauter­ine pregnancy. However, most individuals with bilateral hydrosalpinges must undergo IVF-ET to conceive. Furthermore, the pres­ence of a hydrosalpinx(s) that is visible via ultrasound clearly reduces the chances for pregnancy from IVF. Treatment of a hydrosalpinx(s) prior to IVF by either salpin­gectomy or proximal tubal occlusion has been proven to increase the chance for pregnancy with IVF.

References

1. Honore GM, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril. 1999;5:785–95.
2. CDC. Centers for disease control and prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). 2010 STD treatment guidelines. 2011.
treatment/2010/default.htm
3. den Hartog JE, Morre SA, Land JA. Chlamydia trachomatis- associated tubal factor subfertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(6):719–30.
4. Beyler SA, James KP, Fritz MA, Meyer WR. Hydrosalpingeal fl uid inhibits in-vitro embryonic development in a murine model. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(12):2724–8.
5. Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S, Sagoskin AW, Doyle M, Harris JE, Lessey BA. Hydrosalpinges
http://www.cdc.gov/std/
. Accessed 03 July 2011.
15 H ydr osalp inx
197
adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1393–8.
6. Daftary GS, Kayisli U, Seli E, Bukulmez O, Arici A, Taylor HS. Salpingectomy increases peri- implantation endometrial HOXA10 expression in women with hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):367–72.
7. Ng EH, Ajonuma LC, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx fl uid on sperm motil­ity and survival. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(4):772–7.
8. Baramki T. Hysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1595–606.
9. Frishman GN. The use of intrauterine lidocaine to minimize pain during hysterosalpingography: a ran­domized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1261–6.
10. Swart P. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(3):486–91.
11. Mol BWJ. Reproducibility of the interpretation of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1204–8.
12. Patel MD. Likelihood ratio of sonographic fi ndings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1033–8.
13. Guerriero S. Transvaginal ultrasonography associated with color Doppler energy it the diagnosis of hydro­salpinx. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1568–72.
14. Exacoustos C. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonog­raphy compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye perturbation to evaluate tubal patency. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10(3): 367–72.
15. Strandell A. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:200–4.
16. Chan CC. Comparison of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo- contrast-sonography and diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation in the assessment of tubal patency for the investigation of subfertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(9):909–13.
17. Timor-Tritsch IE. Three-dimensional ultrasound inversion rendering technique facilitates the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38(7): 372–6.
18. American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifi cations of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–55.
19. Schlaff WD, Hassiakos DK, Damewood MD, Rock JA. Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction: prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:984–90.
20. Rock JA, Katayama KP, Martin EJ, et al. Factors infl uencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fi mbrial obstruction. Obstet Gynecol. 1978;52:591–6.
21. Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL. Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization­embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:492–9.
22. Camus E, Poncelet C, Aucouturier JS, et al. Hydrosalpinx and fertilization in vitro-embryo trans­fer abstention or salpingectomy? Abstention, salpin­gectomy, or salpingostomy? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2000;29:466–73.
23. Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, et al. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(3):CD002125.
24. Mijatovic V, Veersema S, Emanuel MH, et al. Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with a contraindication for lapa­roscopy. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1338–42.
25. Galen DI, Khan N, Richter KS. Essure multicenter off­label treatment for hydrosalpinx before in vitro fertil­ization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:338–42.
26. Murray DL, Sagoskin AW, Widra EA, Levy MJ. The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in vitro fertiliza­tion pregnancy rates and the benefi t of surgical correc­tion. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:41–5.

Virtual Hysterosalpingography: A New Diagnostic Technique for the Study of the Female Reproductive Tract

Patricia Carrascosa and Carlos E. Sueldo
1 6

General Concepts

Virtual hysterosalpingography (VHSG) is a new noninvasive diagnostic technique that evolved from our prior experience with virtual colonos­copy studies [ 1 ]; it allows the evaluation of the entire gynecologic tract in a single study, includ­ing the cervix, uterus [ 2 ], and fallopian tubes [ 3 ]. The use of MDCT allows the capture of an axial volumetric acquisition in only a few seconds. This can be post-processed in different planes without loss of defi nition, permitting the evalua­tion of the anatomy or pathology in any plane with similar quality. This concept is known as isotropic images, where tridimensional and bidi­mensional images have the same resolution than axial images.
The CT scanners should have at least 64 rows of detectors [ 4 ] in order to acquire the images in less than 5 s. The VHSG provides information not only about the gynecologic tract but also of the intrapelvic structures revealing associated fi ndings.
The patient preparation for the study and the timing in the menstrual cycle is similar
P. Carrascosa , MD Maipu Diagnostics , Buenos Aires , Argentina
C. E. Sueldo , MD (*) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (REI Division) , University of California San Francisco- Fresno , 722 Medical Center Dr. East Suite 105 , Clovis , CA 93611 , USA e-mail: drsueldo@hotmail.com
to a conventional HSG; also it has the same contraindications (pregnancy, pelvic infections, etc.). After exposing the ectocervix with a vagi­nal speculum and applying iodine to the cervix, we place a plastic catheter size 10 F through the ectocervix and instill 15 ml of a diluted iodine solution (at 70 % in Physiosol) with a pump running at 0.3 ml/s. The purpose of using the pump is to achieve steady pressure and speed, to diminish the patient’s discomfort, and to assure an optimal uterine distention. The image acqui­sition begins 30 s after starting the instillation and is completed after 5 s; MDCT with 256 or 320 rows of detectors complete the study in only
1.5 s, making VHSG a real-time study with easy visualization of the contrast as it passes into the peritoneum (Figs. 16.1 and 16.2 ).
Technical parameters in the CT equipment with either 64 [ 5 ] or 256 rows are shown in Table 16.1 .
Once the images are acquired, they are trans­ferred to the workstation for different reconstruc­tions: multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), maximal intensity projection (MIP), volume ren­dering (VR), and endoscopic views.
Multiplanar reconstructions (coronal, sagittal, and oblique) allow for the evaluation of the cer­vix, uterus, and fallopian tubes, as well as extra­uterine structures, while the curved MPR evaluates all the female structures in a single plane (Fig.
Maximal intensity projection (MIP) images provide excellent defi nition of the fallopian tubes in a tridimensional format with grey tones,
16.3 ).
L.A. Stadtmauer, I. Tur-Kaspa (eds.), Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-9182-8_16, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
199
200
P. Carrascosa and C.E. Sueldo
Fig. 16.1 VHSG (volume rendering projection)
Table 16.1 Technical parameters in CT equipment with
64 vs 256 rows
Technical parameters Slice thickness 0.9 0.625 Reconstruction interval 0.45 0.3 KV 100 80 mAs 100–150 100–150 Scan time acquisition 5 s 1.5 s Radiation dose (mSv) 0.9 0.3
64 rows
256 rows
Fig. 16.2 VHSG (maximum intensity projection)
detecting the presence of hydrosalpinx and tubal obstructions (Fig. 16.2 ).
Volume rendering reconstructions provide tri- dimensional views of the reproductive tract, with a window that recognizes the endoluminal con­trast. These reconstructions detect a large spec­trum of uterine and tubal pathology such as cervical stenosis, polyps, and tubal disease (Figs. 16.4 , 16.5 , and 16.6 ).
Virtual endoscopy algorithm of reprocessing images confi rms the fi ndings encountered with the previous methods and provides intraluminal
Fig. 16.3 VHSG (multiplanar reconstruction of an endo­cervical polyp)
Fig. 16.4 VHSG (volume rendering in tubal disease)
16 Virtual Hysterosalpingography: A New Diagnostic Technique for the Study of the Female
201
Fig. 16.5 VHSG (volume rendering in tubal disease)
Fig. 16.7 Normal uterine cavity (endoscopy view)
Fig. 16.6 Cervical stricture
information similar to a conventional hysteros­copy and falloposcopy (Figs. 16.7 and 16.8 ).
The rate of complications with VHSG in our experience is extremely low; in over 7,000 VHSG studies performed since 2006, we did not fi nd any cases of infection, bleeding, or other signifi cant complications requiring hos­pitalization. In a few cases we observed intra­vascular passage of contrast, of which only
Fig. 16.8 Abnormal uterine cavity (endoscopy view)
one patient had an allergic reaction requiring medical treatment that improved all symptoms in a very short time.
In known cases of allergy to iodine, we use gadolinium [ 6 ], a nonallergenic paramagnetic contrast with a much higher cost (3×) than the iodine contrast and therefore should not be used routinely. We recently performed a com­parative study between iodine and gadolinium
202
P. Carrascosa and C.E. Sueldo
( n = 50 patients, with 25 in each group) which gave the following results: gadolinium was slightly better tolerated than iodine in terms of discomfort, the density of the intraluminal images was not as intense with gadolinium, and however the overall quality of the studies was fairly similar. In addition, the amounts of radiation exposure (0.9 mSv) for both contrasts used in this particular study were also similar.
The VHSG study [ 7 , 8 ] is well tolerated by our patients, and they all completed a question­naire post-procedure to evaluate the degree of discomfort experienced, categorized from grade 0 (no discomfort) to grade IV (very severe dis­comfort). Over 60 % of the patients had grade 0, 20 % grade I, 16 % grade II, 1.5 % grade III, and 0.5 % grade IV. Interestingly, those patients that previously had a conventional HSG revealed much better acceptance of VHSG compared to those patients that never had a conventional HSG.
Radiation During VHSG : The obvious com- parison of the amount of radiation during a VHSG study is with a conventional HSG, which itself varies a great deal depending upon the time of fl uoroscopy employed and the number of fi lms taken per study. If, for example, an HSG with 2 min of fl uoroscopy and 6 fi lms obtained was performed, it would result in a radiation exposure of 5 mSv. On the other hand, a VHSG with a 256- row multidetector CT using our lat­est protocols and technical parameters will pro­duce an exposure of only 0.3–0.4 mSv. It is important to emphasize that this remarkable drop in radiation exposure with the use of the latest CT models is accomplished without com­promising the quality of the studies performed.

Clinical Experience with Virtual Hysterosalpingography in Reproductive Medicine

Cervical Pathology in Infertility
The cervical anomalies may include different types of pathology, like cervical stenosis, syn­echiae, wall irregularities, polypoid lesions, and diverticula. The pathology present may alter
Fig. 16.9 Cervical synechiae
uterine access in infertile patients during certain procedures such as uterine studies, intrauterine inseminations, and embryo transfers, as well as the possibility of causing cervical bleeding dur­ing those procedures, interfering with the optimi­zation of results.
The etiology of stenotic cervices may be con- genital, postsurgical, or postinfections; VHSG is an ideal diagnostic instrument for cervical pathol­ogy as it does not require traction with a tenacu­lum, and it does not leave blind sectors after image reconstruction; the MPR, MIP, and VR are useful in diagnosing cervical stenosis allowing one to navigate through the cervical lumen clearly identifying the defects (Fig. 16.6 ).
Cervical synechiae are bands of fi brous tissue localized inside the cervix, partially or com­pletely occupying the lumen; the synechiae are easily identifi ed by VHSG as elevated endocervi­cal images showing soft tissue densities coming from the wall toward the center of the cervix (Fig. 16.9 ).
Cervical polyps are elevated lesions which vary in size and number, although the majority of patients have only a single polyp. They may result from an abnormal response to the presence of elevated estrogens, chronic infl ammation, etc. and can present either asymptomatically or with vaginal bleeding during intercourse or any other cervical manipulation. They are rarely malig­nant, but after removal they should always be sent to pathology. They are seen by VHSG as
16 Virtual Hysterosalpingography: A New Diagnostic Technique for the Study of the Female
203
Fig. 16.10 Endocervical polyp
partially or totally obstructing the lumen; the MPRs show the soft tissue images and the virtual endoscopy the endoluminal view of the polyp (Fig. 16.10 ).
The cervical diverticula are herniations of the cervical wall that can be seen by VHSG through tridimensional and endoscopic views, where one can clearly detect the neck of the diverticulum inside the lumen. It is unclear if diverticula play a role in human infertility.
Pathology of the Endometrial Cavity in Infertility
There are different pathologies that can affect the endometrial cavity and also can be detected by VHSG [ 9 ]. Most of them have tremendous importance in reproductive medicine, as they can compromise sperm transport, embryo implanta­tion, or embryo growth, potentially increasing the rate of spontaneous miscarriages. In one of our VHSG studies, we evaluated in a prospective manner the diagnostic accuracy and potential clinical value in the detection of cervical and uterine pathology in 69 patients, in comparison to conventional diagnostic hysteroscopy (done by clinicians blinded to the VHSG fi ndings). Virtual HSG showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 96 %, a
specifi city of 86 %, a positive predictive value of 90 %, and a negative predictive value of 95.6 %.
Congenital anomalies of the Müllerian duct , such as septate or bicornuate uterus, can be diag­nosed by VHSG [ 10 ]. An accurate diagnosis is important in order to properly advise patients about the best treatment to be implemented. The MRI is considered the study of choice due to its tissue resolution and its ability to outline the outer margins of the uterine wall. Recently, we demonstrated the value of VHSG in the dif­ferential diagnosis of these uterine anomalies, as one can easily outline the external surface of the uterine fundus. VHSG with volume render­ing reconstruction allows the visualization of the endometrial cavity plus the adjacent fl at or minimally indented myometrium consistent with a septated uterus. On the other hand, when the indentation in the uterine fundus is deeper than 15 mm, creating the presence of two separate horns, the diagnosis of bicornuate uterus is made (Fig. 16.11a ); in uterine malformations, the endo- scopic view is unable to differentiate between septate and bicornuate uteri (Fig. 16.11b ).
Uterine synechiae consist of fi brous bands that bind the uterine walls to one another; they represent scars usually caused by trauma from an aggressive curettage postabortion or postpartum; their presence may be localized in a small sector of the cavity or extensively spread out in a diffuse manner, obliterating large sectors of the uterine cavity. They can cause infertility or repeated pregnancy losses. VHSG is an excellent diagnos­tic tool as MPR shows irregularly elevated lesions with soft tissue density, while volume rendering reconstructions show fi lling defects where the synechiae are localized (Fig. 16.12 ).
Endometrial polyps constitute focal elevations of the endometrium and contain glands, fi brous stroma, and blood vessels; they are fairly com­mon (11–24 %) among infertile patients. Their role in causing infertility is controversial, but there is some consensus that those polyps larger than 1 cm should be removed, especially when present in IVF candidates. VHSG has various modalities of image reconstruction (bidimen­sional, tridimensional, and endoscopic) that allow the visualization and identifi cation of the
204
a
P. Carrascosa and C.E. Sueldo
b
Fig. 16.12 Endometrial synechiae
Fig. 16.11 Uterine malformation: ( a ) volume rendering
and ( b ) endoscopic views
intrauterine lesions; the MPRs show the polyps as elevated lesions from the wall that move toward the cavity with a soft tissue density. The virtual endoscopic images show the polyps with endoluminal views, allowing the assessment of polyp size and shape (Fig. 16.13 ).
Submucous myomas are generally benign tumors from the smooth muscle, single or multi­ple, with a variable size, number, and location. They may be a cause of infertility when they are
Fig. 16.13 Endometrial polyp
submucous in location, as they may interfere with sperm transport and/or embryo implantation and they may also cause repeated miscarriages. The identifi cation of the tumors is important as it can help plan the best surgical approach for their
16 Virtual Hysterosalpingography: A New Diagnostic Technique for the Study of the Female
ab
Fig. 16.14 Submucous myoma seen by ( a ) endoscopic and ( b ) volume rendering views
205
removal and the possible success of the proce­dure. The use of VHSG permits the identifi cation of submucous myomas and determines the size and at times the percentage of intramural exten­sion. We determined that the sensitivity and spec­ifi city of VHSG for the detection of submucous myomas are 91.7 and 100 %, respectively. The volume rendering and endoscopic views clearly distinguish the endometrial-myometrial line and localize the myoma and its relation with the endometrial cavity (Fig. 16.14a, b ).
Evaluation of the Fallopian Tubes
Hysterosalpingography (HSG) has been the tra­ditional method of evaluation of the fallopian tubes for the last several decades; tubal patency is clearly established as the dye injected passes through the fi mbriated ends and disperses around the peritoneal cavity near the adnexa. The diag­nosis of tubal obstruction when a hydrosalpinx is present is fairly certain; on the other hand the lack of passage of dye into the fallopian tube may represent a cornual spasm, a mucus plug, or
insuffi cient amount (or pressure) of the contrast injected transcervically to complete the study. Recently, the introduction of VHSG, as a new diagnostic modality based on computer tomogra­phy, appears to be a step forward in the diagnosis of fallopian tube pathology. Initially in our expe­rience with this technique, using older CT equip­ment, we were not able to clearly visualize the fallopian tubes. More recently, the use of 256­row MDCT allows the study to be completed in only 1.5 s, capturing the images in real time while the fi lling material is still present in the tubes or as it escapes through the fi mbriated ends. Through the fi lling of the fallopian tubes, one is able to obtain volumetric images of high resolution, which allows high image quality and virtual endoscopic navigation, similar to the visualization of the inner tubal lumen as described by conventional falloposcopy. Also, the projection of volume rendering (VR) pro­vides excellent defi nition of the fallopian tubes, detecting the presence of hydrosalpinx (Fig. 16.15 ), tubal obstructions (Fig. 16.5 ), etc. making VHSG a valuable diagnostic tool for the assessment of tubal pathology.
206
P. Carrascosa and C.E. Sueldo
Fig. 16.15 Bilateral hydrosalpinges

Conclusions

VHSG should be considered a new and
improved diagnostic technique for the evalua-
tion of the female reproductive tract over other
existing diagnostic modalities, as it provides
high-quality images of the cervix, uterine cav-
ity, and fallopian tubes. The versatility of the
image reconstructions allows for accurate
visualization and diagnosis of diverse patho-
logic processes in the female reproductive
tract, many of them of high signifi cance in
infertility. The study is completed in a short
amount of time, well tolerated, and with mini-
mal radiation exposure as compared to con-
ventional HSG. The cost-benefi t ratio, which
varies from country to country, is an important consideration that should be determined on an individual basis; yet we are confi dent that VHSG has a bright future given its many diag­nostic advantages.

References

1. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Sangster D, Carrascosa J. Virtual colonoscopy: experience in 500 patients. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2003;33(3):145–9.
2. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Baronio M, Lopez EM, Borghi M, Sueldo C, Papier S. Virtual hysteroscopy by multidetector computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(4):381–7.
3. Carrascosa P, Baronio M, Capunay C, Lopez E, Borghi M, Sueldo C, Papier S. Multidetector CT vir­tual hysterosalpingography in the investigation of the uterus and fallopian tubes. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67(3): 531–35.
4. Carrascosa P, Baronio M, Capunay C, Lopez EM, Sueldo C, Papier S. Clinical use of 64-row multislice CT hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of female factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1953–58.
5. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Vallejos J, Baronio M, Lopez EM, Borghi M, Sueldo C, Papier S. 64 Row multidetector CT virtual HSG. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34(1):121–33.
6. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Vallejos J, Baronio M. Gadolinium vs iodine virtual HSG: an alternative for patients allergic to iodine 64 row multidetector CT virtual HSG. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S157.
7. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Vallejos J, Lopez EM, Carrascosa J. Virtual HSG: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive sys­tem. Radiographics. 2010;30(3):643–61.
8. Celik O, Karkas H, Hascalik S, Tagluk M. Virtual hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy: assessment of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using 64-detector CT data sets. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2383–84.
9. Carrascosa P, Capunay C, Vallejos J, Baronio M, Carrascosa J. Virtual hysterosalpingography: experi­ence with over 1000 consecutive patients. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(1):1–14.
10. Carrascosa P, Sueldo C, Capunay C, Baronio M, Papier S. Virtual HSG in the diagnosis of bicornuate vs septate uterus. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5): 1190–92.