Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4612_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Audiology Review: Preparing for the Praxis and Comprehensive Examinations
https://t.me/medicina_free
112
TABLE 3–1. Binaural Advantage Table
BINAURAL TASK ADVANTAGE AUTHORS
Loudness summation (noise) Doubling Marks (1980)
Absolute threshold (noise) 2–3 dB Pollack (1948)
Absolute threshold (tonal stimuli) 2–3 dB Shaw et al. (1947)
Threshold in noise 0–2 dB Hirsh (1948)
Intensity discrimination ~60% improvement Jesteadt and Wier (1977)
Frequency discrimination ~60% improvement Jesteadt and Wier (1977)
Speech (speech recognition threshold) ~2.5 dB Shaw et al. (1947)
it arrives to both ears at the same intensity; however, if the signal moves off to one side or the other (even by 1°), these higher-frequency sounds will arrive at a higher intensity to the ipsilateral ear. The contralateral ear will receive a lower-intensity signal (as much as 20 dB lower at 6 kHz and higher) due to the absorption and reflection of sound around the head and torso (i.e., shorter wavelengths deflect away from the contralateral ear while longer wavelengths will “wrap around” the head and torso). Across different frequencies and stimuli, humans are able to detect IID/ILDs as little as 0.5 to 3 dB.
n
Lower-frequency information (<1500 Hz) will be affected by ITD/IPDs for localization.
These occur because of the time (maximum of 600 µs between ears) it takes for the signal to reach the contralateral ear, which also translates into a different phase of the signal arriving to the contralateral as opposed to the ipsilateral ear. A difference in the cochlear and central transmission of the auditory signal can help a listener identify the location of a sound source.
Greatest ITD/IPDs are present at approximately 90° and 270° (directly to the right or left,
respectively).
AUDIOLOGY NUGGET
Most, if not all, prescriptive HA formulae (i.e., NAL-NL2, DSL, IHAFF, and manufacturer specific) prescribe increased gain in cases of monaural fittings. This is accounts for the lack of binaural input and reduced loudness perception associated with a monaural fitting. An additional amount of gain (ranging from 3 to 10 dB depending on the input level) is often prescribed in these instances. Newer HA technology has begun taking advantage of binaural cues by pairing the aids together and transferring data between them to help in gain adjust­ments, localization cues, and speech in noise enhancements.
CHAPTER 3 Acoustics, Psychoacoustics, and Instrumentation
https://t.me/medicina_free
113
MAF vs. MAP Curves
Human auditory sensitivity varies by frequency and method of presentation (headphones or speakers). When auditory sensitivity is evaluated through a speaker, the results are referred to as the minimum audible field (MAF) curve. Signals presented through headphones provide what is known as the minimum auditory pressure (MAP) curve. These curves were derived many years ago by measuring auditory sensitivity (by frequency) for thousands of otologically normal listeners. Figure 3–15 provides an example of the sensitivity by frequency of the MAF and MAP.
n
Sensitivity shown on the MAF curve is approximately 6 dB better than that shown on
the MAP curve. This is often referred to as the “missing 6 dB.” However, in practical terms, this is most likely to be a 2 to 3 dB difference at maximum when accounting for specific recording parameters and accounting for the reflective effects of the head commonly referred to as the head-related transfer function (Yost, 2013). As such, about half of the 6 dB difference is related to the binaural advantage and the remainder created by calibration effects.
Effects of Frequency and Amplitude on Loudness Perception
The perception of loudness varies across the range of audible frequencies. These are visualized via phon curves and are often referred to as equal loudness contours (Figure 3–16). Horizontal lines along the equal loudness contours visually represent each phon level (10–120 phon). At any point along a single curve, the perceived loudness of that tone will be judged to be of equal loudness to a 1000 Hz tone on that same curve. Of note, at higher intensities, the phon curve is flatter, sug­gesting more equal perception of loudness across frequencies at higher intensities than at lower intensities.
FIGURE 3–15. MAP vs. MAF curve. Source: Adapted from Hearing Science Fundamentals, Second Edition (pp. 1–370) by Lass, N. J., & Donai, J. J.
Copyright © 2023 Plural Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.
Audiology Review: Preparing for the Praxis and Comprehensive Examinations
https://t.me/medicina_free
114
FIGURE 3–16. Equal loudness contours (phon curves). Source: Adapted from Hearing
Science Fundamen­tals, Second Edition
(pp. 1–370) by Lass, N. J., & Donai, J. J. Copyright © 2023 Plural Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.
AUDIOLOGY NUGGET
The ability to discern minimal differences in intensity is often measured using a just noticeable difference (JND) task that involves comparing loudness or pitch between two sounds (a standard sound and comparison sound). The outcome is often referred to as the difference limen for intensity (or difference limen for frequency if measuring JND for frequency). Weber’s law is relevant to discus­sions of the detection of changes in perceived loudness. In short, Weber’s law (or applied as the Weber fraction) states that a change in a perceived attribute (e.g., brightness, weight, loudness) is directly proportional to the magnitude of the original stimulus or object. In other words, if the magnitude of the original stimulus or object is low (e.g., a dull light, soft sound, or light [weight] object), a small change in magnitude is discernible between the two. If the magnitude is high (e.g., a bright light, loud sound, or heavy object), a larger change in magnitude is required to detect a change. Imagine a classroom with the lights off (low number of lumens). When someone turns on a flashlight in the front of the room, the increased light from flashlight is easily detected because the original magnitude is low. Imagine the same situation with the lights on (higher number of lumens), with the same flashlight lit. It is likely that the extra light due to the flashlight will go undetected because the original magnitude of the light is high. Similarly, a change from 20 to 21 dB SPL is typically discernible, whereas a change from 80 to 81 dB SPL is not.
CHAPTER 3 Acoustics, Psychoacoustics, and Instrumentation
https://t.me/medicina_free
115
Auditory Recruitment and Outer Hair Cell (OHC) Function
Recruitment is characterized by an abnormal growth of perceived loudness. Due to a loss of OHC function (the active mechanism/cochlear amplifier), soft sounds are inaudible and thus require increased intensity to reach threshold; loud sounds are perceived to be approximately as loud as they would be to individuals with normal hearing or at levels reported prior to hearing loss. The perceptual result of recruitment is a reduced dynamic range, which is often described as the intensity difference between a listener’s threshold and his or her uncomfortable listening level. These values are often obtained using a process called loudness scaling commonly used during the fitting of HAs or CIs.
n
Reductions in dynamic range cause specific problems for fitting HAs. Listeners with
recruitment require more gain for low-level sounds, due to the loss of the OHC active mechanism, and less gain for moderate to loud sounds.
n
One processing feature in current HAs to account for this need is called wide dynamic range
compression (WDRC). WDRC attempts to account for the loss of OHC function associated with sensory hearing loss by quickly providing more gain for soft inputs and less gain for increasingly louder signals. This reduces the need for the patient to consistently increase and decrease the volume of the HA.
n
WDRC adjusts the gain of the device automatically once the HA is programmed to account
for differences in input levels and the patient’s loudness needs.
KNOWLEDGE CHECKPOINT
Recall that WDRC provides increased gain for lower-level inputs and less gain as input levels increase. While this is beneficial for maintaining comfort and more normal perception of loudness, this difference distorts the natural interaural­level differences present without amplification. Imagine the level of sound at the right ear being 55 dB SPL and due to the head shadow effect, the level of the same sound being 45 dB SPL at the left ear (a 10 dB difference). WDRC will provide more gain for the sound arriving at the left ear (where the sound is 45 dB, i.e., 10 dB less than the right ear). Less gain is provided for the sound at the right ear (due to a higher input level of 55 dB). Thus, the original 10 dB interaural difference will be reduced (to 5 dB, for example), thus providing an unnatural and less pronounced interaural cue for the listener. However, current technology allows communication and the sharing of information between the two HAs, thus ameliorating this potential issue to some degree.
Perception of Pitch and Timbre
Human listeners continuously make perceptual judgments regarding the pitch (perceived on a scale from low to high) and timbre (a qualitative description of complexity or quality) of sounds in their auditory environments. From recognizing the sex of a talker (which often relies on voice pitch typically
Audiology Review: Preparing for the Praxis and Comprehensive Examinations
https://t.me/medicina_free
116
associated with fundamental frequency [F0]) to recognizing musical instruments in a musical selection, these perceptual tasks are completed with minimal effort or attention. For a comprehensive review of the process of pitch perception and evidence regarding how human listeners perceive pitch, please review Yost (2009).
Theories of Pitch Perception
There are two generally accepted theories of pitch perception related to tonal stimuli: spectral (place) and temporal theory. Spectral theory posits that pitch is derived based on place of maximum basilar membrane excitation for tonal stimuli and multiple locations of basilar membrane excitation for complex signals. Temporal theory posits that pitch is extracted from the temporal patterns of neural impulses evoked by the signal. In general, it is accepted that spectral theory allows for the perception of pitch for high-frequency signals and temporal theory produces pitch sensation for low-frequency signals due to better phase locking (i.e., the synchronicity of neural firing with the frequency of the stimulus) of the auditory nerve below 1 kHz (see Figure 3–17 for a visual adapted from Palmer & Russell, 1986).
Spectral (Place) Theory
Spectral (place) theory of pitch originated in the fact that the auditory system acts as a frequency analyzer and performs a Fourier analysis (frequency analysis along the basilar membrane) of the incoming stimulus. The pitch of a signal is thought to be associated with the point at which maximum basilar membrane displacement occurs.
n
A spectral (place) mechanism is thought to allow for the perception of high-frequency signals
due to an inability of the auditory system to efficiently phase lock to signals above 1 kHz and a complete inability to phase lock to signals above 5 kHz (Palmer & Russell, 1986). Note the decrease in synchronization strength (synchronization index) of auditory nerve firing with increasing frequency in Figure 3–17. As such, because phase locking is poor for high­frequency signals (above approximately 1–5 kHz), the place of auditory excitation provides the perceptual information to discern signal pitch.
Temporal Theory
Temporal theory of pitch proposes that individual nerve fibers synchronize (fire) to the periodic (phase) properties of a signal at low frequencies (below approximately 1 kHz). As frequency increases, indi­vidual neurons are unable, due to refractory periods and other neural processes, to fire to each phase of a periodic signal.
n
When this occurs, neighboring frequencies fire at alternating phases, commonly referred to
as the volley principle (Wever & Bray, 1937). This process allows for the encoding of signal frequency due to a pooled neural response (from which pitch is derived).
Residue Pitch and Case of the Missing F0
While it is the case that F0 plays a role in the perception of pitch, it is also true that pitch can be preserved in the absence of the F0. Commonly referred to as residue pitch or the case of the missing
CHAPTER 3 Acoustics, Psychoacoustics, and Instrumentation
https://t.me/medicina_free
FIGURE 3 –17. Phase locking strength by frequency. Source: Adapted with the permission of Elsevier, from Palmer, A. R., & Russell, I. J. (1986). Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hearing Research, 24(1), 1–15; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
117
fundamental, this phenomenon lends support to the temporal theory of pitch perception as the removal of frequency component(s), F0 in this case, does not significantly alter the perception of pitch (although it is possible that the signal may not evoke as strong a sensation of pitch). In this phenom­enon, the relative distance between adjacent harmonics in frequencies above F0 creates a periodicity (pitch period) in the signal associated with F0, and from that, pitch is preserved and extracted.
Q & A
Question: What is a real-world example of residue pitch?
Answer: Historically, the effective bandwidth of most telephones ranged from
approximately 300 to 3400 Hz. As such, spectral energy at F0 for most adult male and female speakers was outside of the bandwidth of most telephones, and therefore information at this frequency was not available to listeners. Because the temporal information (period) associated with F0 is preserved in the signal, the listener on the other end could determine the sex of the talker (F0 being a salient cue for talker sex) with little difficulty.
Perception of Timbre
The perception of timbre is a qualitative judgment regarding sound quality or complexity. Timbre is derived from the spectral envelope of a signal. In other words, two identical harmonic complexes (i.e., signal with F0 with subsequent harmonics) with varying harmonic peak energy (e.g., peak energy of one signal is the second harmonic and peak energy of the other signal is at the sixth harmonic) will have
Audiology Review: Preparing for the Praxis and Comprehensive Examinations
https://t.me/medicina_free
118
similar pitch but will vary in timbre. As such, spectral envelope differences (peak harmonic energy) among these types of signals provide salient acoustic information for the perception of timbre. Timbre perception allows listeners to detect two different musical instruments simultaneously playing the same musical note.
Cochlear Dead Regions and Perceptual Considerations
When cochlear damage becomes severe and involves both the OHCs and inner hair cells (IHCs), cochlear dead regions occur. A cochlear dead region is a portion of the cochlea void of functioning OHCs and IHCs. Perceptual consequences of cochlear dead regions commonly include (but are not limited to):
n
Loss of sensitivity: particularly to low-level sounds, damaged hair cell areas may still be able to
detect sounds at high sound levels due to the vibration of the basilar membrane at frequencies near the signal frequency (referred to as off-frequency listening). These tonal signals are often described as having a “scratchy” or noise quality versus a tonal quality.
n
Loudness recruitment: damage to the OHCs resulting in an abnormally rapid growth in loudness,
due to change in slope of the response of the basilar membrane (becoming more linear)
n
Reduction in frequency selectivity: the damaged cochlea results in a reduced ability to
separate or resolve the different frequency components in sounds, leading to poorer frequency discrimination and speech perception abilities
n
Effects on pitch perception: reduction in the precision of neural phase locking and neural
representation of the temporal fine structure of sounds
AUDIOLOGY NUGGET
The threshold-equalizing noise (TEN) test is a clinical behavioral test for cochlear dead regions wherein a wideband noise is spectrally shaped to give a constant masked threshold for a pure tone presented in the noise. The primary purpose of the TEN test is to determine if the obtained response is representative and being elicited by the frequency of interest or a result of excitation of a neighboring frequency (or off-frequency listening). If the frequency of the tone falls within a dead region, then the threshold will be higher (≥10 dB) with the noise present (masked) than without (unmasked) and/or the threshold will be at least 10 dB higher than the presentation level of the TEN. With TEN noise present, the test tone activity will be masked and the response is actually being elicited from a neighboring area of the cochlea (which is not masked by the noise). The thresh­old for the tone will be higher (poorer) than if the tone was detected at the area of the cochlea tuned to the frequency since the basilar membrane is moving less at the adjacent areas than the presentation frequency. The presence of a cochlear dead region has implications for the fitting of amplification, specifically the type of processing required to account for the dead region (frequency lowering vs. traditional amplification). For additional details, please refer to Moore (2010).
CHAPTER 3 Acoustics, Psychoacoustics, and Instrumentation
https://t.me/medicina_free
n
Effects on speech perception: some parts of speech are inaudible, which decreases ability to
119
understand speech; also smears (distorts) spectrum leading to poorer resolution of formants and other important frequency cues
Instrumentation in Audiology
The provision of audiological diagnostic and rehabilitative services is highly dependent upon the use of technical equipment. Proper equipment function is determined by standards developed by organiza­tions such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Periodically, this equipment requires exhaustive calibration, which is typically completed by a calibration company with extensive experience in this process. The following sections include information regarding commonly used instrumentation in audiology service provision but are not intended to be an exhaustive review.
ANSI and ISO Specifications
Table 3–2 (ANSI) and Table 3–3 (ISO) contain standards relevant to the profession of audiology. ANSI and the ISO publish a wide range of standards that include determining audiometric zero (0 dB HL) and the calibration of audiological testing equipment to maximum allowable ambient noise levels for sound-treated test rooms, among others.
Audiometry Transducers
n
Air-conduction transducers include supra-aural (e.g., TDH-39, TDH-49), circumaural (e.g.,
Sennheiser HDA 200 or 300, Koss HV/1A), insert earphones (e.g., Etymotic ER-3A), and soundfield speakers. Ultra-high-frequency audiometry (9–20 kHz) is traditionally administered using Sennheiser HDA 200 or 300 due to a flatter frequency response above 8kHz compared to supra-aural and insert options, which have significant frequency response roll-off above 8 kHz.
One advantage of insert earphones is higher levels of interaural attenuation than that found
with supra-aural earphones. Interaural attenuation represents the decibel reduction of a sound as it crosses the head from the test ear to the non–test ear. The average increase in interaural attenuation is approximately 15 to 30 dB HL (from approximately 40 dB HL for supra-aural to a conservative 50 to 70 dB HL for inserts if properly inserted). Insert earphones also protect against collapsing canals common in certain populations (e.g., young children and elderly individuals).
Using transducers with increased levels of interaural attenuation reduces the need for masking
in cases of asymmetrical hearing loss and instances of masking dilemmas (e.g., significant bilateral conductive hearing loss), which is helpful in fast-paced clinical environments. Detailed information on interaural attenuation and masking is provided in Chapter 5.
n
Bone-conduction oscillators deliver a calibrated amount of force to stimulate the bone-
conduction auditory pathway. Theoretically, bone-conduction oscillators can be placed anywhere on the skull; however, a mastoid or forehead placement is most common.
Interaural attenuation for bone oscillators is conservatively set at 0 dB HL, when in fact it
varies depending upon age and other physical factors.
TABLE 3–2. Relevant ANSI Standards for Audiology
https://t.me/medicina_free
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ANSI S3.1-1999 (Revised
2018)
Maximum permissible ambient noise for audiometric test rooms
For MPANLs allowed in a test room that produce negligible masking (2 dB) of test signals presented at reference level equivalent threshold levels
ANSI S3.2-1999(R2020) Method for measuring the
intelligibility of speech over communication systems
For English word lists, methods for selecting and training the talkers and listeners, for designing and reporting test conditions, for calculating the intelligibility score, for analyzing and reporting the test results
ANSI S3.6-2018 Specification for audiometers For use in determining the threshold
level in comparison with chosen standard reference threshold level, including pure tone, speech, and masking signals
ANSI S3.7-2016 Method for Measurement of
Calibration of Earphones
ANSI S3.13-1987(R2020) Mechanical Coupler for
Measurement of Bone Vibrators
For use with circum-aural, supra-aural, and insert-type headphones
For calibrating bone conduction audiometers and making measurements on bone vibrations and bone conduction hearing aids
ANSI S3.20-1995(R2003) Bioacoustical Terminology For definitions for terms including
hearing, speech, psychoacoustics, and physiological acoustics
ANSI S3.21-2004 Methods for Manual Pure-
Tone Threshold Audiometry
Procedure for pure-tone testing for persons conducting in industry, schools, medical settings, and other areas
ANSI S3.25-1989(R2003) Occluded Ear Simulator Designed to stimulate the acoustic portion
of the ear canal between the earmold and the eardrum, from 100 Hz to 10 kHz
ANSI S3.36-1985(R2006) Specification for Manikin for
Simulated In Situ Airborne Acoustic Measurements
For various uses including measurement of hearing aid gain under simulated conditions and other head-related transfer functions (HRTFs), and based on anthropomorphically average adult manikin head, ear, and torso
ANSI S3.39-1987(R2007) Specification for Instruments
to Measure Aural Acoustic Impedance and Admittance
For measurements of acoustic impedance, and acoustic admittance within the ear canal
(Aural Acoustic Immittance)
ANSI S1.4-1983(R2006) Specification for Sound Level
Meters
For performance specifications for sound­measuring instruments, including transient sound signals and digital techniques and displays
TABLE 3–3. Relevant ISO Standards for Audiology
https://t.me/medicina_free
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ISO 8253-1, 2010 Acoustics — Audiometric Test
Methods
— Part 1: Basic Pure Tone Air and Bone Conduction Threshold Audiometry
ISO 389-1, 2017 Acoustics
— Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment
— Part 1: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Supra-Aural Earphones
ISO 389-2, 1994 Acoustics
— Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment
— Part 2: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Insert Earphones
ISO 389-3, 2016 Acoustics
— Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment
— Part 3: Reference Equivalent Threshold Vibratory Force Levels for Pure Tones and Bone Vibrators
Procedures and requirements for screening purposes only, including air conduction, pure-tone audiometric test, speech audiometry, electrophysiological audiometry, and procedures
A standard reference zero for the scale of hearing threshold level, for pure­tone air conduction audiometers, to promote agreement and uniformity in the expression of hearing threshold level measurements throughout the world
Levels supplementary to those specified in ISO 389:1991 (to be reissued as ISO 389-1), applicable to insert earphones of type Etymotic Research ER-3A, coupled to the human ear by ear inserts of type ER-3-1
Calibration of bone vibrators for pure-tone bone-conduction audiometry:
(a) reference equivalent threshold vibratory force levels (RETVFL), for threshold of hearing of young otologically normal persons by bone-conduction audiometry;
ISO 389-4, 1994 Acoustics
the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment — Part 4: Reference Levels for Narrow-Band Masking Noise
ISO 389-5, 2006 Acoustics
the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment — Part 5: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones in the Frequency Range 8 kHz to 16 kHz
— Reference Zero for
— Reference Zero for
(b) essential characteristics of the bone vibrator and the method of coupling to the test subject, and to the mechanical coupler
Reference levels for narrow-band masking noise presented for air conduction in pure­tone audiometry, in terms of levels to be added to the reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for the corresponding pure-tone frequencies
Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (RETSPLs) of pure tones in the frequency range from 8 to 16 kHz applicable to the calibration of air-conduction audiometers for specific earphones
121