Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_117_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
2
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
15 Мб
Скачать
☆
Explainable AI forColorectal Cancer Classication
Table 4 Specicity of DNN model 1 and 2 of the proposed and current methods using datasets 1 and 2, respectively
Dataset 1 Dataset 2 Mean Std Min Max Mean Std Min Max
Un normalized 0.8188 0.0165 0.7835 0.8561 0.9237 0.0076 0.9081 0.9378 Min–max 0.8380 0.0117 0.8169 0.8652 0.8880 0.0964 0.3838 0.9297 MMADN 0.8021 0.0316 0.7322 0.8541 0.8750 0.0136 0.8541 0.9108 Sigmoid 0.8158 0.0179 0.7671 0.8518 0.8714 0.0230 0.7784 0.9081 ZSN 0.8040 0.0178 0.7671 0.8494 0.8724 0.0124 0.8460 0.8919 Sqrt-sum 0.8640 0.0172 0.8353 0.8986 0.9479 0.0060 0.9378 0.9595 Abs-diff 0.8549 0.0216 0.7854 0.8868 0.9137 0.0107 0.8946 0.9351 Sqrt-prod 0.8567 0.0156 0.8146 0.8871 0.9370 0.0076 0.9162 0.9568 Abs-shift 0.8173 0.0155 0.7925 0.8585 0.9296 0.0123 0.8973 0.9541 Combined 0.8510 0.0143 0.8278 0.8800 0.8647 0.0136 0.8405 0.8919
219
It can be observed that both sqrt-sum and combined or feature extension meth­ods, depending on the properties of the underlying dataset, can readjust the data distribution, improve feature relevance, normalize data, and reduce the number of outliers. As demonstrated in Ref. [43] on imbalanced activity classes in smart homes, readjusting data distribution can improve classication performance. The use of standard deviation of the raw data to compute new data points shifts the data­set into a new feature space where normal values are mapped to a region that is almost linear, while outliers and extreme values are mapped along the tails of the new range [19]. This diminishes the effect of both outliers and extreme features. Based on the Pareto concept, uniformly computing square roots across a dataset rescales its data points and reduces the effect of extraneous values by a big margin while slightly reducing the effect of normal values [34]. Summation is used in the sqrt-sum method as a simple way to avoid producing extraneous intermediate com­putation values. Combining standard deviation and square root transformation of data points produce a new method that combines the good properties of the underly­ing methods and is more robust. Hence, sqrt-sum (the aggregate method) achieves the best AUC performance on both datasets and improves sensitivity and specicity of a DNN model. As observed on dataset 2, sensitivity of the method, however, is negatively affected when data is highly biased toward negative cases.
The combined method that transforms a scalar data point into a vector represen­tation by combing synthetic datapoints produced by sqrt-sum, abs-diff, sqrt-prod, and abs-shift methods combined with the original scalar data point produces a data­set with an increased feature space. It transforms a two-dimensional to a three­dimensional dataset in order to reduce variability based on the concept of noisy replicates. Adding noisy replicates to a dataset has proven to be a natural regulariza­tion technique for classication of models that are based on skewed datasets [44]. As a result, it has been possible to develop data augmentation techniques that draw from the concept of noisy replicates to improve classication of models based on microbiome data [23]. As an example, recently Lo and Marculescu [24] proposed a
220
method that uses negative binomial distribution to create noisy replicates as way of augmenting microbiome data in order to improve classication accuracy of a DNN­based model.
In the context of ML classication tasks, a prevalent approach to enhance the efcacy of a model is to augment the sample size, thereby mitigating the impact of variability. Alternative techniques, such as feature selection, can be employed to mitigate variability. Feature selection is a method employed to address overtting, whereby certain data features are eliminated to decrease the dimensionality of the input data. The technique is primarily employed for the purpose of recognizing and preserving features that exhibit a high degree of predictiveness [45]. The primary aim of the feature extension technique employed in this chapter is to produce arti­cial features alongside the existing features, thereby enabling the DNN model to conduct its inherent feature selection on the conceivably enhanced dataset.
This concept was adequately outlined by Mulenga et al. [20], who proposed feature selection based on conventional normalization methods. The work in this chapter is slightly different in the sense that, in addition to the sqrt-sum method, it proposes the use of customized normalization methods for feature extension. Although the feature extension method has a slightly lower performance than the sqrt-sum method, it has also been observed that the former outperforms the conven­tional normalization methods. This shows that feature extension based on custom­ized normalization methods has great potential to improve DNN-based classication performance of microbiome data. The use of customized normalization methods could be useful for dynamic implementation of feature extension where normaliza­tion methods can be constructed on the y and applied to generate additional fea­tures in a dataset. Customized normalization method could be a better alternative to conventional normalization methods, which are limited by the underlying properties of individual datasets [19].
M. Mulenga et al.
5 Conclusions
In this chapter, we propose two methods to improve the classication of colorectal cancer (CRC) using gut microbiome data from stool samples. The rst method, called sqrt-sum, involves a data normalization technique that adds the standard deviation of the raw dataset to nonzero items of the same dataset and computes the square root of the new data points. This helps reduce outliers and dominant features. The second method, feature extension, generates additional features using the sqrt- sum method and other customized normalization techniques. It transforms scalar data points into vectors to enhance feature relevance across the dataset, which is then subjected to feature selection performed by a DNN model.
Our experimental results show that the sqrt-sum method outperforms baseline methods in terms of AUC, sensitivity, and specicity. It demonstrates the effective­ness of the sqrt-sum method in improving CRC classication based on gut microbi­ome data. The feature extension method achieves the second-best performance and
Explainable AI forColorectal Cancer Classication
221
exhibits stability. Furthermore, our ndings highlight the robustness of aggregated normalization methods in handling anomalies commonly found in datasets. Future research should explore how these methods perform across different machine learn­ing algorithms and investigate their integration with other feature selection meth­ods, such as lter and ensemble-based approaches. This work contributes to advancing CRC classication using gut microbiome data by introducing novel methods and providing evidence of their efcacy. It offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the eld and serves as a foundation for further investigations.
Further research is warranted to explore the variations in the effects of aggregate normalization methods across diverse machine learning algorithms. Understanding how these methods perform in different ML frameworks would provide valuable insights for optimizing their application in various contexts. Additionally, an intrigu­ing avenue for future investigation lies in leveraging the feature extension technique within the context of other feature selection methods, including lter and ensemble­based approaches. Such exploration could yield valuable synergies and potentially enhance the overall performance and interpretability of CRC classication models using gut microbiome data.
References
1. Thomas AM, Manghi P, Asnicar F, Pasolli E, Armanini F, Zolfo M etal (2019) Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation. Nat Med 25(4):667–678
2. Zackular JP, Rogers MAM, Rufn MT, Schloss PD (2014) The human gut microbiome as a screening tool for colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res 7(11):1112–1121
3. Ahlquist DA, Zou H, Domanico M, Mahoney DW, Yab TC, Taylor WR et al (2012) Next­generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas. Gastroenterology 142(2):248–256. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.031
4. Jahani-Sherafat S, Alebouyeh M, Moghim S, Amoli HA, Ghasemian-Safaei H (2018) Role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer; a review article. Hepatol Bed Bench 11(2):101–109
5. Mamoshina P, Vieira A, Putin E, Zhavoronkov A (2016) Applications of deep learning in bio­medicine. Mol Pharm 13(5):1445–1454
6. Reiman D, Metwally A, Dai Y (2017) Using convolutional neural networks to explore the microbiome. In: Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS, pp4269–4272
7. Fioravanti D, Giarratano Y, Maggio V, Agostinelli C, Chierici M, Jurman G et al (2018) Phylogenetic convolutional neural networks in metagenomics. BMC Bioinform 19(Suppl
2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859- 018- 2033- 5
8. Wirbel J, Pyl PT, Kartal E, Zych K, Kashani A, Milanese A etal (2019) Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specic for colorectal cancer. Nat Med 25(4):679–689
9. Pietrucci D, Teofani A, Unida V, Cerroni R, Biocca S, Stefani A etal (2020) Can gut micro­biota be a good predictor for Parkinson’s disease? A machine learning approach. Brain Sci 10(4):242
10. Le V, Quinn TP, Tran T, Venkatesh S (2019) Deep in the bowel: highly interpretable neu­ral encoder-decoder networks predict gut metabolites from gut microbiome. BMC Genomics
222
21:256. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2- s2.0- 85088351795&doi=10.1186
%2Fs12864- 020- 6652- 7&partnerID=40&md5=edd22ace0075494ba08edef65ad7ee9c
11. Oh M, Zhang L (2020) DeepMicro: deep representation learning for disease prediction based on microbiome data. Sci Rep 10(1):6026
12. Peng X, Li G, Liu Z (2016) Zero-inated beta regression for differential abundance analysis with metagenomics data. J Comput Biol 23(2):102–110
13. Li H (2015) Microbiome, metagenomics, and high-dimensional compositional data analysis. Annu Rev Stat Its Appl 2(1):73–94
14. Chaki J, Dey N (2019) Pattern analysis of genetics and genomics: a survey of the state-of-art. Multimed Tools Appl 79:11163
15. Manor O, Borenstein E (2015) MUSiCC: A marker genes based framework for metagenomic normalization and accurate proling of gene abundances in the microbiome. Genome Biol 16(1):1–20
16. Pereira MB, Wallroth M, Jonsson V, Kristiansson E (2018) Comparison of normalization methods for the analysis of metagenomic gene abundance data. BMC Genomics 19(1):1–17
17. Gloor GB, Wu JR, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2016) It’s all relative: analyzing micro­biome data as compositions. Ann Epidemiol 26(5):322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
annepidem.2016.03.003
18. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S etal (2014) PLoS Comput Biol 10(4):e1003531
19. Singh D, Singh B (2019) Investigating the impact of data normalization on classication per­formance. Appl Soft Comput J 97:105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524
20. Mulenga M, Kareem SA, Sabri AQM, Seera M, Govind S, Samudi C et al (2021) Feature extension of gut microbiome data for deep neural network based colorectal cancer classica­tion. IEEE Access 9:1–14
21. Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Kurt Zatloukal HM (2019) Causability and explainability of articial intelligence in medicine. Wires Data Min Knowl Discov 9(4):e1312
22. Zhang Q, Wu YN, Zhu SC (2018) Interpretable convolutional neural networks. In: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, pp8827–8836
23. Knights D, Costello EK, Knight R (2011) Supervised classication of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35(2):343–359
24. Lo C, Marculescu R (2018) MetaNN: Accurate Classication of Host Phenotypes from Metagenomic Data Using Neural Networks. ACM-BCB 2018 - Proc 2018 ACM Int Conf Bioinformatics. Comput Biol Heal Inform 20(Suppl 12):608–609. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12859- 019- 2833- 2
25. Kaul A, Mandal S, Davidov O, Peddada SD (2017) Analysis of microbiome data in the pres­ence of excess zeros. Front Microbiol 8:1–10
26. Douglas GM, Hansen R, Jones CMA, Dunn KA, Comeau AM, Bielawski JP etal (2018) Multi-omics differentially classify disease state and treatment outcome in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Microbiome 6(1):1–12
27. Zyprych-Walczak J, Szabelska A, Handschuh L, Górczak K, Klamecka K, Figlerowicz M etal (2015) The impact of normalization methods on RNA-Seq data analysis. Biomed Res Int 2015:1
28. McKnight DT, Huerlimann R, Bower DS, Schwarzkopf L, Alford RA, Zenger KR (2019) Methods for normalizing microbiome data: an ecological perspective. Methods Ecol Evol 10(3):389–400
29. Weiss S, Xu ZZ, Peddada S, Amir A, Bittinger K, Gonzalez A etal (2017) Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome 5(1):1–18
30. Lausser L, Szekely R, Schirra LR, Kestler HA (2018) The inuence of multi-class feature selection on the prediction of diagnostic phenotypes. Neural Process Lett 48(2):863–880
31. Guo J, Peng Y, Fan L, Zhang L, Ni BJ, Kartal B etal (2016) Metagenomic analysis of anam­mox communities in three different microbial aggregates. Environ Microbiol 18(9):2979–2993
M. Mulenga et al.
Explainable AI forColorectal Cancer Classication
32. Korpela K, Flint HJ, Johnstone AM, Lappi J, Poutanen K, Dewulf E etal (2014) Gut micro­biota signatures predict host and microbiota responses to dietary interventions in obese indi­viduals. PLoS One 9(3):e90702
33. Carrieri AP, Haiminen N, Maudsley-Barton S, Gardiner LJ, Murphy B, Mayes AE etal (2021) Explainable AI reveals changes in skin microbiome composition linked to phenotypic differ­ences. Sci Rep 11(1):4565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 021- 83922- 6
34. Noda I (2008) Scaling techniques to enhance two-dimensional correlation spectra. J Mol Struct 883–884(1–3):216–227
35. Pasolli E, Schiffer L, Manghi P, Renson A, Obenchain V, Truong DT etal (2017) Accessible, curated metagenomic data through ExperimentHub. Nat Methods 14(11):1023–1024. https://
doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4468
36. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S, Jordan G, Chamberlain S (2019) Package ‘phyloseq.’ Version
1.48.0. Bioconductor. Available from: https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/
phyloseq.html
37. Kahr PC, Hammerl S, Huber-Schönauer U, Schmied CM, Haegeli LM, Obeid S etal (2019) Atrial brillation: a new indicator for advanced colorectal neoplasia in screening colonoscopy. J Clin Med 8(7):1083
38. Baxter NT, Rufn MT, Rogers MAM, Schloss PD (2016) Microbiota-based model improves the sensitivity of fecal immunochemical test for detecting colonic lesions. Genome Med 8(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073- 016- 0290- 3
39. Pandey SK, Janghel RR (2019) Recent deep learning techniques, challenges and its applica­tions for medical healthcare system: a review. Neural Process Lett 50(2):1907–1935. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11063- 018- 09976- 2
40. Mulenga M, Kareem SA, Sabri AQM, Seera M (2021) Stacking and chaining of normalization methods in deep learning-based classication of colorectal cancer using gut microbiome data. IEEE Access 9:97296–97319
41. Zou F, Shen L, Jie Z, Zhang W, Liu W (2018) A sufcient condition for convergences of Adam and RMSProp, pp11127–11135. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.09358
42. Garbin C, Zhu X, Marques O (2020) Dropout vs. batch normalization: an empirical study of their impact to deep learning. Multimed Tools Appl 79:12777
43. Guo S, Liu Y, Chen R, Sun X, Wang X (2019) Improved SMOTE algorithm to deal with imbalanced activity classes in smart homes. Neural Process Lett 50(2):1503–1526. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11063- 018- 9940- 3
44. Lee SS (2000) Noisy replication in skewed binary classication. Comput Stat Data Anal 34(2):165–191
45. Qu K, Gao F, Guo F, Zou Q (2019) Taxonomy dimension reduction for colorec­tal cancer prediction. Comput Biol Chem 83(June):107160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
compbiolchem.2019.107160
223
Explainable AI (XAI)-Based
Robot- Assisted Surgical Classication Procedure
RamSubbaReddySomula, NarsimhuluPallati, MadhuriThimmapuram, andShobaRaniSalvadi
Abstract
Background of the Work
Many robot-assisted surgical (RAS) procedures may be arranged in a tree struc­ture. RAS can break down the superstate representing every given surgical job into its constituent states. An important rst step toward several automated surgeon­assisting features is the assessment of these discrete states at various time granulari­ties during RAS.
Motivation for the Work
We provide a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) method called Decay, Transfer, and Compose (DTC) that can estimate both the present super- and ne­grained states simultaneously. DTC can handle anomalies in the dataset by explor­ing its class limits by means of a class decay process. Statistics from the da Vinci®Xi surgical scheme’s endoscope, robotic arms, and system events are all included into DTC.
R. S. R. Somula Sunchon National University, Suncheon, South Jeolla, South Korea
N. Pallati (*) Department of Computer Engineering and Technology, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India
M. Thimmapuram Department of Information Technology, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
S. R. Salvadi Department of AI & DS, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Ltd. 2024 R. Aluvalu et al. (eds.), Explainable AI in Health Informatics, Computational Intelligence Methods and Applications,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3705-5_11
225© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte
226
Contributions in this Chapter
When tested on the HERNIA dataset, which was collected during actual robotic inguinal hernia repair surgeries, DTC was found to provide reliable estimations of both the ne-grained public of the procedure. We demonstrate that DTC’s hierarchi­cal structure enhances the state-of-the-art state approximation throughout the full HERNIA-20 RAS operation. We also evaluate the relative importance of different kinds of input data and the architecture of DTC in achieving high precision in esti­mating the status of the operating room.
Keywords Convolutional neural network · Anomalies dataset · HERNIA-20 · Robot-assisted surgical process · da Vinci®Xi · Anomalies
R. S. R. Somula et al.
1 Introduction
To treat a variety of illnesses, doctors have begun using robot-assisted surgery (RAS) [1]. Patients who had RAS procedures reported fewer complications, less blood loss, and faster recoveries compared to those who underwent open surgery [2]. Robotic surgical systems, such as da Vinci, are easier to use and safer than lapa­roscopy because they reduce the need for skilled human intervention. Surgical robots can also deliver time-stamped data, robot kinematics. There is a wide variety of applications for the comprehensive and complete description of a surgical opera­tion offered by these sources [3–5]. Emerging research topics on the use of articial intelligence (AI) in RAS include, but are not limited to, autonomy [6, 7], evaluation of surgeon ability [8, 9], workow analysis, and so on. Robotic surgical systems increasingly employ AI for passive virtual xtures [9], advisory information presen­tation, and automated surgical activity [10]. Accurate understanding of the current stage is essential for these AI systems to be benecial during surgery. This sensitiv­ity to time should reach into the microsecond range, letting the surgeon attend to the tiniest of details. Explainable AI, often abbreviated as XAI, refers to the develop­ment and deployment of AI systems and models that can provide human- interpretable explanations for their decisions and actions. In other words, XAI aims to make AI algorithms transparent and understandable to humans, allowing users to compre­hend how and why an AI system arrived at a particular decision or recommendation.
There is a high degree of consistency in the surgical duties performed during a certain type of treatment, such as a hernia repair, when using a robotic surgical sys­tem [11]. Numerous surgical procedures, such knot-tying and running suture, may be broken down into repeatable, ne-grained surgical conditions. The fundamental components of a surgical task may be broken down into these ne-grained condi­tions, which include the doctor’s activities and conservational observations. In this chapter, we model a RAS operation as a medical procedure, similar to the signi­cant modeling approach known as surgical oncology [12]. The hierarchical fuzzy sets model (HFSM) states that in real-world scenarios, objects often have multiple
Explainable AI (XAI)-Based Robot-Assisted Surgical Classication Procedure
levels of membership to different fuzzy sets, which cannot be effectively repre­sented by a single fuzzy set [13]. In order to more accurately capture the temporal developments of operations, HFSM models depict the current status of the proce­dure at each time step using various degrees of temporal granularity. Estimating surgical (super) states has several uses. Evaluation of surgical competence, coordi­nation of operating-room workow, and retrospective analysis are all facilitated by the ability to automatically identify the present surgical job [14]. Automating a sur­gical procedure relies on being able to accurately predict the state of a procedure at a ne-grained level. In order to successfully implement AI applications in RAS, simultaneous state estimation at varying temporal granularities is essential.
227
1.1 Background ofSurgical State Estimation
Estimating a state that lasts a few seconds [15], such as moving a needle over tissue, and estimating a surgical job that lasts notes [16, 17], such as dissecting a hernia sac, are two examples of the hierarchical surgical state estimation method. These activities each have their own unique difculties. Surgical states have a ne texture, yet they are hard to categorize because of their brief duration and the fact that they change on their own. However, as superstates can last anywhere from 1 min to 10–30min, capturing long term is essential for estimating the surgical job. Data from a real-world RAS is expensive to collect and very variable. Even for similar procedures, the viewing angles, backdrops of different patients might vary widely. Furthermore, surgical procedures might vary from case to case and physician to surgeon. Surgery state estimate approaches that rely on data face difculties due to the small size and great variability of real-world RAS datasets.
There have been prior efforts to estimate both super- and ne-grained surgical states. Many different types of data collected by surgical robots have been employed by existing ne-grained surgical state estimate algorithms to infer the actual surgi­cal state. Hidden Markov models, temporal clustering [18], and elds have all been employed by researchers to predict the kinematics of the surgical robot and simulate state transitions. It has also been proposed that between adjacent items in time recorded as long short-term memory (LSTM) [19]. Fine-grained surgical state esti­mations benet from using several data sources such as endoscopic vision [20]. The use of several input sources in data-driven state estimate approaches allows for the extraction of a more complete representation of surgical states, leading to greater estimation accuracy, especially in realistic RAS scenarios. Endoscopic video data has been heavily utilized in previous segmentation work for surgical phases and tasks. In order to train a CNN-LSTM, Twinanda etal. [21] employed laparoscopic surgery endoscopic video annotations. Robot-assisted surgical procedures involve the use of robotic systems to assist surgeons in performing various types of surgical interventions. These robotic systems are designed to enhance surgical precision, dexterity, and control, ultimately improving patient outcomes. XAI is an approach in articial intelligence that aims to provide transparency and understanding of the
228
decision-making process of AI models. When applied to a robot-assisted surgical procedure, XAI can help enhance the trust and acceptance of the system by provid­ing explanations for the actions and decisions made by the AI-powered robot. Here is an overview of how XAI can be integrated into a robot-assisted surgical proce­dure. Evaluate the effectiveness of the XAI techniques in providing meaningful explanations and supporting decision-making in the robot-assisted surgical proce­dure. Gather feedback from surgeons or healthcare professionals to assess the utility and usability of the system. By incorporating XAI techniques into a robot-assisted surgical procedure, it becomes possible to provide interpretable explanations for the actions and decisions made by the AI model. This transparency and understanding can contribute to improved trust, acceptance, and collaboration between the AI sys­tem and the surgical team, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and safety.
R. S. R. Somula et al.
1.2 Contribution
To enhance the effectiveness of pretrained models in the database identication of surgical state estimation scenarios, this research proposes a CNN on class decom­position, which is known as the Decay, Transfer, and Compose (DTC) model. The pretrained models can do this by including a class decomposition layer. Each class in the picture dataset is broken down into numerous subclasses with the goal of assigning novel tags to the novel collection, where each subsection is considered as a separate class.
The rest of the chapter is organized as follows: Sect. 11.2 stretches the literature review, Sect. 11.3 explains the DTC model, Sect. 11.4 illustrates the validation anal­ysis of the proposed DTC model with existing approaches, and Sect. 11.5 provides a conclusion and future directions.
2 Related Works
Mahmood etal. [22] proposed combining the strengths of residual networks and dense constructions to provide a surgical equipment segmentation method that is both accurate and robust. Our proposed method was tested on the dataset and the abdominal dataset. Associated to state-of-the-art approaches, the consequences of the experiments prove that the projected approach is far more effective.
In order to routinely recognize and categorize suturing movements for needle driving attempts, Luongo etal. [23] use deep learning and computer vision. A total of 2395 movies were used to create datasets for identication, and a total of 511 lms were used to create datasets for classication, each of which was used to train a computer vision model to predict one of two classes. The networks were trained using the optical ow information and the raw red, green, and blue pixels from each frame. Each using an 80/20 split. All models in this study were able to reliably
Explainable AI (XAI)-Based Robot-Assisted Surgical Classication Procedure
229
predict, with probabilities much above chance, both the presence of a gesture and the kind of gesture (for classication). Our results demonstrate that computer vision is able to recognize subtle cues that serve to both identify the suturing procedure and distinguish it from other types of suturing.
Izzetoglu etal. [24] used a sensor called spectroscopy to investigate the hemody­namic vicissitudes produced in the prefrontal cortex area of the brain during the skill improvement of resident surgeons (fNIRS). Twenty-four surgical residents from diverse training programs used a RAS simulator over the course of two train­ing sessions (blocks) to complete sponge suturing tasks of varying degrees of dif­culty. The data shows that the prefrontal cortex’s oxygenation changed signicantly less during the second training session associated to the rst.
Qin et al. [25] introduced a deep learning-based approach to surgical state approximation, termed the hierarchical states with deep, which can provide esti­mates for both the current super- and ne-grained surgical states and takes informa­tion such as endoscopic images, robot motion, and robot. After putting HESS-DNN through its paces on the HERNIA-20 dataset, which was gathered during real-world robotic inguinal hernia repair surgeries, it is demonstrated that it can accurately predict both states. We show that HESS-hierarchical DNN structure signicantly improves state-of-the-art state approximation by applying it to the HERNIA-20 RAS approach. In addition, we explore the role of HESS-DNN architecture and dif­ferent types of input data in obtaining high accuracy in surgical (super)state prediction.
Shaei etal. [26] suggested developing an algorithm to objectively measure sur­geon distraction during robotic surgery (RAS). Twenty-two medical students had their EEGs recorded as they performed one of ve crucial SURG-TLX. Part of it was dedicated to rating how easily one’s mind wanders (scale: 1–20). All sources of distraction were scored from least distracting (scores of 1–6, subjective label 1) to most distracting (scores of 7–12, subjective label 2) to most distracting (scores of 13 or more, subjective label 3) (for subjective rating of “3,” scoring range: 13–20). These thresholds were decided on informally following a discussion among the participants and experienced surgeons to classify the students’ levels of distraction. Using SURG-subjective TLX’s assessments of distraction, we were able to evaluate the efcacy of our method and the proposed categorization scheme. Pearson’s cor­relation was also used to examine the relationship between the simulator’s mea­sured performance and the participants’ reported levels of distraction (assessment scores). The projected end-to-end perfect ranked levels of distraction as low (95% accurate), moderate (89% accurate), and high (95% accurate), respectively.
Fan etal. [27] compared the physiology of open surgery to that of (1) nonsurgical work and (2) the two surgeon responsibilities in robotic surgery [27]. The physical demands of 22 surgeons were evaluated using electromyography of the trapezius muscles and inertial measurement units of the position and crusade of the head, upper arms, and torso during the course of surgical workdays. In this study, the physical demands placed on surgeons during open surgery were compared to those of doctors performing other types of procedures—RAS for the differential analysis. Open surgery often consumed more than half of a surgeon’s working day. When