Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5234_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
234 Computational Intelligence Algorithms
19. Khedher, L., Illán, I.A., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Brahim, A. and Meyer-Baese, A.,
2017. Independent component analysis-support vector machine-based computer-aided
diagnosis system for Alzheimer’s with visual support. International Journal of Neural
Systems, 27(03), p. 1650050.
20. Rabeh, A.B., Benzarti, F. and Amiri, H., 2016, March. Diagnosis of Alzheimer diseases
in early step using SVM (support vector machine). In 2016 13th International Conference
on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization (CGiV) (pp. 364–367). IEEE.
21. Bi, X.A., Shu, Q., Sun, Q. and Xu, Q., 2018. Random support vector machine cluster
analysis of resting-state fMRI in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One, 13(3), p.e0194479.
22. Binson, V.A., Thomas, S., Subramoniam, M., Arun, J., Naveen, S. and Madhu, S.,
2024. A review of machine learning algorithms for biomedical applications. Annals of
Biomedical Engineering, 52(5), pp. 1159–1183.
23. Bi, X., Li, S., Xiao, B., Li, Y., Wang, G. and Ma, X., 2020. Computer aided Alzheimer’s
disease diagnosis by an unsupervised deep learning technology. Neurocomputing, 392,
pp. 296 –304.
24. Liu, Y., Mazumdar, S., Bath, P.A. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,
2023. An unsupervised learning approach to diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease using
brain magnetic resonance imaging scans. International Journal of Medical Informatics,
173, p. 105027.
25. Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Li, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, H. and Fujita, H., 2021. CMC: A consensus multi-view clustering model for predicting Alzheimer’s disease progression.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 199, p. 105895.
26. Cunningham, P., Cord, M. and Delany, S.J., 2008. Supervised learning. In Machine
Learning Techniques for Multimedia: Case Studies on Organization and Retrieval
(pp. 21–49). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
27. Singh, A., Thakur, N. and Sharma, A., 2016, March. A review of supervised machine
learning algorithms. In 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for
Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) (pp. 1310–1315). IEEE.
28. Jakkula, V., 2006. Tutorial on support vector machine (SVM). School of EECS,
Washington State University, 37(2.5), p. 3.
29. Thomas, S. and Thomas, J., 2024. Nondestructive and cost-effective silkworm, Bombyx
mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) cocoon sex classication using machine learning.
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 44(3), pp. 1–13.
30. Guo, G., Wang, H., Bell, D., Bi, Y. and Greer, K., 2003, November 3–7. KNN modelbased approach in classication. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003:
CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS,
DOA, and ODBASE 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, Proceedings (pp. 986–996). Springer
Berlin Heidelberg.
31. LaValley, M.P., 2008. Logistic regression. Circulation, 117(18), pp. 2395–2399.
32. Zhang, H. (2004) The Optimality of Naive Bayes. Proceedings of 17th International
Florida Articial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Menlo Park, 12-14 May
2004, 562–567.
33. Binson, V.A., Subramoniam, M. and Mathew, L., 2021. Detection of COPD and lung
cancer with electronic nose using ensemble learning methods. Clinica Chimica Acta,
523, pp. 231–238.
34. Liu, S., Liu, S., Cai, W., Pujol, S., Kikinis, R. and Feng, D., 2014, April. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with deep learning. In 2014 IEEE 11th International
Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (pp. 1015–1018). IEEE.
35. Tong, T., Wolz, R., Gao, Q., Guerrero, R., Hajnal, J.V., Rueckert, D. and Alzheimer’s
Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2014. Multiple instance learning for classication of
dementia in brain MRI. Medical Image Analysis, 18(5), pp. 808–818.

235 Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Algorithms
36. Kruthika, K.R., Maheshappa, H.D. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,
2019. Multistage classier-based approach for Alzheimer’s disease prediction and
retrieval. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 14, pp. 34–42.
37. Ju, R., Hu, C. and Li, Q., 2017. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on restingstate brain networks and deep learning. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational
Biology and Bioinformatics, 16(1), pp. 244–257.
38. Binson, V.A., Subramoniam, M., Sunny, Y. and Mathew, L., 2021. Prediction of pulmonary diseases with electronic nose using SVM and XGBoost. IEEE Sensors Journal,
21(18), pp. 20886–20895.
39. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J.,
2009. Unsupervised learning. In The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining,
Inference, and Prediction (pp. 485–585). Springer
40. Al-Nuaimi, A.H., Jammeh, E ., Sun, L. a nd Ifeachor, E., 2015, August. Tsallis ent ropy as a biomarker for detection of Alzheimer’s disease. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference
of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 4166– 4169). IEEE.
41. Mallik, S. and Zhao, Z., 2020. Detecting methylation signatures in neurodegenerative disease by density-based clustering of applications with reducing noise. Scientic
Reports, 10(1), p. 22164.
42. Jaeger, A. and Banks, D., 2023. Cluster analysis: A modern statistical review. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 15(3), p.e1597.
43. Ikotun, A.M., Ezugw u, A.E., Abualigah, L., Abuhaija, B. and Hem ing, J., 2023. K-means
clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the
era of big data. Information Sciences, 622, pp. 178–210.
44. Murtagh, F. and Contreras, P., 2012. Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: An overview.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(1), pp. 86–97.
45. Schubert, E., Sander, J., Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P. and Xu, X., 2017. DBSCAN revisited, revisited: Why and how you should (still) use DBSCAN. ACM Transactions on
Database Systems (TODS), 42(3), pp. 1–21.
46. Binson, V.A., Thomas, S., Ragesh, G.K. and Kumar, A., 2021, September. Non-invasive
diagnosis of COPD with E-nose using XGBoost algorithm. In 2021 2nd International
Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, Embedded and Secure
Systems (ACCESS) (pp. 297–301). IEEE.
47. Maćkiewicz, A. and Ratajczak, W., 1993. Principal components analysis (PCA).
Computers & Geosciences, 19(3), pp. 303–342.
48. Shi, R., Wang, L., Jiang, J. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2022,
July. An unsupervised region of interest extraction model for tau PET images and its
application in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. In 2022 44th Annual International
Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)
(pp. 2157–2160). IEEE.
49. Jin, S., Zou, P., Han, Y. and Jiang, J., 2021, November. Unsupervised detection of individual
atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. In 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 2647–2650). IEEE.
50. Baydargil, H.B., Park, J.S. and Kang, D.Y., 2021. Anomaly analysis of Alzheimer’s
disease in PET images using an unsupervised adversarial deep learning model. Applied
Sciences, 11(5), p. 2187.
51. Ortiz, A., Munilla, J., Gorriz, J.M. and Ramirez, J., 2016. Ensembles of deep learning
architectures for the early diagnosis of the Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal
of Neural Systems, 26(7), p. 1650025.
52. Jha, D. and Kwon, G.R., 2016. Alzheimer disease detection in MRI using curvelet
transform with KNN. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 14(8),
pp. 121–129.

236 Computational Intelligence Algorithms
53. Aderghal, K., Boissenin, M., Benois-Pineau, J., Catheline, G. and Afdel, K., 2016,
December. Classication of sMRI for AD diagnosis with convolutional neuronal networks: A pilot 2-D+ study on ADNI. In International Conference on Multimedia
Modeling (pp. 690–701). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
54. Korolev, S., Saullin, A., Belyaev, M. and Dodonova, Y., 2017, April. Residual and
plain convolutional neural networks for 3D brain MRI classication. In 2017 IEEE
14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) (pp. 835–838).
IEEE.
55. Valliani, A. and Soni, A., 2017, August. Deep residual nets for improved Alzheimer’s
diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics,
Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (pp. 615–615).
56. Lin, W., Tong, T., Gao, Q., Guo, D., Du, X., Yang, Y., Guo, G., Xiao, M., Du, M.,
Qu, X. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2018. Convolutional neural
networks-based MRI image analysis for the Alzheimer’s disease prediction from mild
cognitive impairment. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, p. 777.
57. Zeng, N., Qiu, H., Wang, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, H. and Li, Y., 2018. A new switchingdelayed-PSO-based optimized SVM algorithm for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.
Neurocomputing, 320, pp. 195–202.
58. Raza, M., Awais, M., Ellahi, W., Aslam, N., Nguyen, H.X. and Le-Minh, H., 2019.
Diagnosis and monitoring of Alzheimer’s patients using classical and deep learning
techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 136, pp. 353–364.
59. Richhariya, B., Tanveer, M., Rashid, A.H. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging
Initiative, 2020. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using Universum support vector machine based recursive feature elimination (USVM-RFE). Biomedical Signal
Processing and Control, 59, p. 101903.
60. Liang, S., & Gu, Y., 2020. Computer-aided diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease through
weak supervision deep learning framework with attention mechanism. Sensors, 21(1),
p. 220.
61. Li, H., Shi, X., Zhu, X., Wang, S. and Zhang, Z., 2022. FSNet: Dual interpretable
graph convolutional network for Alzheimer’s disease analysis. IEEE Transactions on
Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 7(1), pp. 15–25.
62. Kim, J.S., Han, J.W., Bae, J.B., Moon, D.G., Shin, J., Kong, J.E., Lee, H., Yang, H. W.,
Lim, E., Kim, J.Y. and Sunwoo, L., 2022. Deep learning-based diagnosis of Alzheimer’s
disease using brain magnetic resonance images: An empirical study. Scientic Reports,
12(1), p. 18007.
63. Zeng, N., Li, H. and Peng, Y., 2023. A new deep belief network-based multi-task learning for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Computing and Applications, 35(16),
pp. 11599–11610.
64. Sengupta, S., Basak, S., Saikia, P., Paul, S., Tsalavoutis, V., Atiah, F., Ravi, V.
and Peters, A., 2020. A review of deep learning with special emphasis on
architectures, applications and recent trends. Knowledge-Based Systems, 194,
p. 105596.
65. Narejo, S., Pasero, E. and Kulsoom, F., 2016. EEG based eye state classication using
deep belief network and stacked AutoEncoder. International Journal of Electrical &
Computer Engineering, 6(6), pp. 3131–3141.
66. Salehi, A.W., Baglat, P., Sharma, B.B., Gupta, G. and Upadhya, A., 2020, September.
A CNN model: Earlier diagnosis and classication of Alzheimer disease using MRI. In
2020 International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC)
(pp. 156–161). IEEE.
67. Khvostikov, A., Aderghal, K., Benois-Pineau, J., Krylov, A. and Catheline, G., 2018.
3D CNN-based classication using sMRI and MD-DTI images for Alzheimer disease
studies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.05968.

237 Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Algorithms
68. Farooq, A., Anwar, S., Awais, M. and Rehman, S., 2017, October. A deep CNN
based multi-class classication of Alzheimer’s disease using MRI. In 2017 IEEE
International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) (pp. 1–6).
IEEE.
69. AbdulAzeem, Y., Bahgat, W.M. and Badawy, M., 2021. A CNN based framework for
classication of Alzheimer’s disease. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(16),
pp. 10415–10428.
70. Awarayi, N.S., Twum, F., Hayfron-Acquah, J.B. and Owusu-Agyemang, K., 2024. A
bilateral ltering-based image enhancement for Alzheimer disease classication using
CNN. PLoS One, 19(4), p. e0302358.
71. El-Assy, A.M., Amer, H.M., Ibrahim, H.M. and Mohamed, M.A., 2024. A novel CNN
architecture for accurate early detection and classication of Alzheimer’s disease using
MRI data. Scientic Reports, 14(1), p. 3463.
72. Kumar, P.R., Arunprasath, T., Rajasekaran, M.P. and Vishnuvarthanan, G., 2018.
Computer-aided automated discrimination of Alzheimer’s disease and its clinical progression in magnetic resonance images using hybrid clustering and game theory-based
classication strategies. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 72, pp. 283–295.
73. Lazli, L., Boukadoum, M. and Ait Mohamed, O., 2019. Computer-aided diagnosis system of Alzheimer’s disease based on multimodal fusion: Tissue quantication based on
the hybrid fuzzy-genetic-possibilistic model and discriminative classication based on
the SVDD model. Brain Sciences, 9(10), p. 289.
74. Razavi, F., Tarokh, M.J. and Alborzi, M., 2019. An intelligent Alzheimer’s disease
diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), p. 32.
75. Shin, H.C., Ihsani, A., Xu, Z., Mandava, S., Sreenivas, S.T., Forster, C., Cha, J. and
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2020, October 4–8. GANDALF:
Generative adversarial networks with discriminator-adaptive loss ne-tuning for
Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis from MRI. In Medical Image Computing and Computer
Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru,
Proceedings, Part II 23 (pp. 688–697). Springer International Publishing.
76. Cabreza, J.N., Solano, G.A., Ojeda, S.A. and Munar, V., 2022, February. Anomaly
detection for Alzheimer’s disease in brain MRIs via unsupervised generative adversarial learning. In 2022 International Conference on Articial Intelligence in Information
and Communication (ICAIIC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
77. Zhang, M., Sun, L., Kong, Z., Zhu, W., Yi, Y. and Yan, F., 2024. Pyramid-attentive
GAN for multimodal brain image complementation in Alzheimer’s disease classication. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 89, p. 105652.
78. Pal, N.R., Pal, K., Keller, J.M. and Bezdek, J.C., 2005. A possibilistic fuzzy c-means
clustering algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 13(4), pp. 517–530.
79. Ojeda-Magana, B., Ruelas, R., Corona-Nakamura, M.A. and Andina, D., 2006. An
improvement to the possibilistic fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm. In 2006 World
Automation Congress (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
80. Ji, Z., Xia, Y., Sun, Q. and Cao, G., 2014. Interval-valued possibilistic fuzzy C-means
clustering algorithm. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 253, pp. 138–156.
81. Moattar Husseini, Z., Fazel Zarandi, M.H. and Ahmadi, A., 2023. Adaptive type2possibilistic C-means clustering and its application to microarray datasets. Articial
Intelligence Review, 56(10), pp. 11017–11052.
82. Olle Olle, D.G., Zoobo Bisse, J. and Abessolo Alo’o, G., 2024. Application and comparison of K-means and PCA based segmentation models for Alzheimer disease detection using MRI. Discover Articial Intelligence, 4(1), p. 11.
83. Liu, L., Sun, S., Kang, W., Wu, S. and Lin, L., 2024. A review of neuroimaging-based
data-driven approach for Alzheimer’s disease heterogeneity analysis. Reviews in the
Neurosciences, 35(2), pp. 121–139.

238 Computational Intelligence Algorithms
84. Ganesan, P., Ramesh, G.P., Falkowski-Gilski, P. and Falkowska-Gilska, B., 2024.
Detection of Alzheimer’s disease using Otsu thresholding with tunicate swarm
algorithm and deep belief network. Frontiers in Physiology, 15, p. 1380459.
85. Bouguettaya, A., Yu, Q., Liu, X., Zhou, X. and Song, A., 2015. Efcient agglomerative
hierarchical clustering. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), pp. 2785–2797.
86. Reddy, M., Makara, V. and Satish, R.U.V.N., 2017. Divisive hierarchical clustering with
K-means and agglomerative hierarchical clustering. International Journal of Computer
Trends and Technology (IJCST), 5(5), pp. 5–11.
87. Wolz, R., Julkunen, V., Koikkalainen, J., Niskanen, E., Zhang, D.P., Rueckert, D.,
Soininen, H., Lötjönen, J. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2011.
Multi-method analysis of MRI images in early diagnostics of Alzheimer’s disease.
PLoS One, 6(10), p.e25446.
88. Cuingnet, R., Gerardin, E., Tessieras, J., Auzias, G., Lehéricy, S., Habert, M.O., Chupin,
M., Benali, H., Colliot, O. and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2011.
Automatic classication of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: A
comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database. Neuroimage, 56(2), pp. 766–781.
89. Garg, N., Choudhry, M.S. and Bodade, R.M., 2023. A review on Alzheimer’s disease
classication from normal controls and mild cognitive impairment using structural MR
images. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 384, p. 109745.
90. Xu, F.H., Gao, M., Chen, J., Garai, S., Duong-Tran, D.A., Zhao, Y. and Shen, L., 2024.
Topology-based clustering of functional brain networks in an Alzheimer’s disease
cohort. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 2024, p. 449.
91. Chi, R., Li, K., Su, K., Liu, L., Feng, M., Zhang, X., Wang, J., Li, X., He, G. and Shi, Y.,
2024. Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease based on 3D genome selected circRNA. The
Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease, 11(4), pp. 1–8.
92. Khan, K., Rehman, S.U., Aziz, K., Fong, S. and Sarasvady, S., 2014, Februa ry. DBSCAN:
Past, present and future. In The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of
Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014) (pp. 232–238). IEEE.
93. Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B. and Bharath,
A.A., 2018. Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, 35(1), pp. 53–65.
94. Wang, K., Gou, C., Duan, Y., Lin, Y., Zheng, X. and Wang, F.Y., 2017. Generative
adversarial networks: Introduction and outlook. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica
Sinica, 4(4), pp. 588–598.
95. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S.,
Courville, A. and Bengio, Y., 2020. Generative adversarial networks. Communications
of the ACM, 63(11), pp. 139–144.
96. Sajjad, M., Ramzan, F., Khan, M.U.G., Rehman, A., Kolivand, M., Fati, S.M. and
Bahaj, S.A., 2021. Deep convolutional generative adversarial network for Alzheimer’s
disease classication using positron emission tomography (PET) and synthetic data
augmentation. Microscopy Research and Technique, 84(12), pp. 3023–3034.

Deep Learning
16
Techniques in
Neurological Disorder
Detection
Manisha Nagar, Shikha Singh,
Sanjay Singh, and Ruchi Jain
16.1 INTRODUCTION
Neurological problems affect people of all ages. The prevalence of these disorders
has signicantly risen over the past four to ve years. In numerous instances, there
are no detectable tools for diagnosing neurological disorders. A primary cause of
these disorders is electrical abnormalities in the brain. Today, various neurological
disorders can be diagnosed using advanced technologies such as electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT)
scans, and positron emission tomography (PET) scans. In previous years, machine
learning (ML) algorithms were primarily used to analyze neuroimaging data when
datasets were small. However, with larger datasets, deep learning (DL) has become
necessa ry.
Parkinson’s disease (PD), schizophrenia (SZ), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
are three prevalent neurological conditions [1]. AD is observed by increasing men-
tal decline; it usually affects elderly persons as a result of specic brain regions
deteriorating. Extensive research has been undertaken to accurately identify the
causes of this degeneration and develop automated methods for detecting degeneration patterns in neuroimages. It ranks as the fourth leading contributor to mortality
worldwide, following heart disease, cancer, and brain hemorrhage. AD has three
states: very mildly demented, mildly demented, and moderately demented [2] (see
Figures 16.1–16.3).
In the very mildly demented stage, patients begin to forget where they have kept
their belongings and may have difculty remembering recently learned names. In
the mildly demented stage, patients have difculty remembering words, often get
lost even on familiar routes, and show a decrease in focus and work abilities. In the
moderately demented stage, they begin to forget recent activities and signicant past
events, struggle with budgeting, nd it difcult to go outside alone, and experience
a loss of empathy [3].
Tremors, bradykinesia, stiffness, and unstable posture are among the motor
signs of PD disease, a neurodegenerative condition brought on by the loss of
DO I: 10.1201/ 97810 03520 34 4 -19
239

240 Computational Intelligence Algorithms
FIGURE 16.1 MRI of a mildly demented patient.
FIGURE 16.2 Moderately demented.

241 Deep Learning Techniques in Neurological Disorder Detection
FIGURE 16.3 Very mildly demented.
dopaminergic activity. PD is the second foremost neurological disease affecting
older persons [4]. The exact cause of the disease remains unknown. PD has high
rates of mortality and requires early diagnosis and proper treatment to alleviate personal, social, and national burdens. Two imaging techniques commonly
utilized to detection are PET and single photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT). Table 16.1 presents an overview of the procedures followed in recent
research that employed statistical and ML methods to forecast the presence of PD
from MRI data.
Schizophrenia is a chronic mental condition that impacts around 1% of the
population globally. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report,
around 24 million individuals around the world, or roughly one in every 300,
are affected by schizophrenia (0.32%). The incidence is higher among adults, at
one in 222 (0.45%). Schizophrenia is not very common compared to several other
mental diseases. It typically begins in adulthood or in the 20s, usually men suffering it sooner than women. Some schizophrenia symptoms may be explained
by difculties with the neurological system’s corollary discharge process, which
may make it difcult for patients to distinguish between internally and externally
produced feelings. The exact cause of schizophrenia remains unknown, but factors such as stressful life events, drug use, and their combinations have been
proposed to have contributed to its growth. Neuroimaging is crucial for revealing both functional and structural changes in the human brain. Individuals with

242 Computational Intelligence Algorithms
TABLE 16.1
An Overview of the Procedures Followed in Recent Research that Employed
Statistical and ML Methods to Forecast the Presence of PD from MRI Data
Reference Input Data Active Method Accuracy (%)
[5] PD (57) Voxel-based morphometry (VBM), 100
diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
[6] PSP (21) Support vector machine (SVM)
[7] PD (27) Functional connectome 80
HC (38) SVM
HC (26)
[8] PPMI cohort Connectivity measures 93
PD (374) SVM
HC (169)
[9] PD (30) Region of interest based 86.67
HC (30) SVM
schizophrenia often face human rights breaches in both treatment facilities and
the community. People with this illness experience social exclusion, and relationships with family and friends suffer as a result of the solid and pervasive stigma
against them. Due to discrimination brought on by this stigma, they may have
fewer options for housing, work, education, and general healthcare. Structural
MRI of brain anatomy offers a reliable method for diagnosing schizophrenia.
In the domain of medical imaging, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have
shown to be benecial instruments for the automated diagnosis of a variety of
neurological disorders, including schizophrenia. Millions of people worldwide
suffer from schizophrenia, which has a major negative impact on both individuals
and society. Early and correct diagnosis is critical to effective treatment and management. However, clinical evaluations and manual brain scan interpretation are
signicant components of traditional diagnostic techniques, which can be inconsistent and error-prone. The development of CNNs, which use DL to recognize
complex patterns in MRI images that may be suggestive of schizophrenia, has
made a potent substitute available.
The motivation of this chapter is to address the limitations of traditional MRI
analysis in diagnosing neurological disorders and to explore how DL can revolutionize this eld. Conventional approaches often struggle with accuracy, scalability, and
efciency, leading to unreliable diagnostic results.
The objective of this chapter is achieved through the following subtasks:
i. Compare DL methods with traditional MRI analysis for diagnosing schizo-
phrenia, PD, and AD.
ii. Outline each disorder’s data preprocessing steps and algorithm choices.
iii. Explore performance analysis of DL in neurological diagnosis and identify
challenges in extending these methods to new conditions.

243 Deep Learning Techniques in Neurological Disorder Detection
16.2 RELATED RESEARCH
Zhang et al. [10] demonstrated a DL-based strategy for identifying the difference
between healthy brains and those with AD. Because AD affects many people, there has
been much interest in detecting the condition using MRI and DL. CNNs have been utilized in several works to categorize various AD phases and distinguish them from mild
cognitive impairment (MCI) and t persons. The use of MRI and DL for AD detection
has become a primary research focus due to the disease’s prevalence and impact. Suk
et al. [11] utilized a DL model combining sparse autoencoders and a deep belief network
to extract features from MRI images, achieving signicant accuracy improvements in
AD classication. Payan and Montana [12] developed a 3D CNN to process volumetric
MRI data, demonstrating superior performance in detecting early AD stages compared
to traditional ML methods. Liu et al. [13] used a multimodal approach integrating MRI
with PET data, using a DL framework to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of AD.
In [14], the authors applied a CNN to structural MRI scans, focusing on the substantia nigra region, which is critical in PD pathology. Their model obtained signicant accuracy as well as specicity in identifying PD patients from t persons.
Pereira et al. [15] used resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) data, CNNs could distinguish PD patients and healthy controls, yielding encouraging ndings. MRI-based
DL has showed promise in detecting and diagnosing schizophrenia, a complicated
psychiatric condition with various symptoms. Vieira et al. [16] created a deep neural
network (DNN) to examine brain connection patterns in fMRI data. Their approach
distinguished between patients with and without schizophrenia.
16.3 SUMMARY OF DL TECHNIQUES
Recent developments in neuroimaging modalities, including PET, magnetoencephalography (MEG), and MRI, have improved our knowledge of how the brain functions.
Numerous machine and DL approaches, along with high-performance computer tools,
have made diagnosing and classifying neurological diseases possible. PD has been
identied in MRI scans using various ML approaches, such as SVM, articial neural
networks (ANN), decision tree (DT) models, and Bayes algorithms. The symptoms
of PD frequently begin on one side of the body and may be related to asymmetries in
the brain’s cortical or subcortical systems [17]. Table 16.2 summarizes recent research
employing MRI techniques to predict PD using ML methodologies. Supervised learning approaches are practical for ML applications such as regression, classication,
pattern recognition, and feature extraction. Neurological problems involve the entire
body, including the brain, spinal cord, and nerves, according to scientic classications. Three prevalent neurological ailments include PD, AD, and mental disorders,
such as schizophrenia. In this context, computational intelligence algorithms, particularly DL techniques, have emerged as powerful tools for automating the analysis of
medical images and improving the accuracy of neurodisorder diagnosis. Currently,
various DL approaches are being used to study and cure neurodiseases. These include
neural networks such as ANN, DNN, Autoencoder (AE), CNN, probabilistic neural
networks (PNN), K-nearest neighbors (K-NN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), and
long short-term memory (LSTM).
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
