Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Fundamentals of Toxicology. Tutorial

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
07.09.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
81
that are non-dispersible in air and insoluble in water, are considered as sources of xenobiotic profile formation, since they can have chemical sub­stances embedded in them. Various natural processes, as well as human economic activity can significantly change the natural xenobiotic profile of ecosystems. Chemical substances that accumulate in the environment in unusual quantities and cause a change in the natural xenobiotic profile act as pollutants (Table 5.1). This does not always lead to detrimental conse­quences for humans and wildlife. A chemical substance is only considered an ecotoxicant, if it has accumulated in the environment in an amount suf­ficient to initiate a toxic process in the biocenosis at any level of biological organization. Thus, one of the major practical objectives of ecotoxicology is to determine quantitative parameters for the definition of pollutants as ecotoxicants. The complexity of this objective lies in the fact that, in real conditions, an entire xenobiotic profile of the environment acts on the bi­ocenosis, while modifying the biological activity of individual com­pounds.
Table 5.1
Major chemical pollutants of air, soil and water
Air pollutants
Soil and water pollutants
Gases: Sulphur oxides Nitrogen oxides Carbon oxides Ozone Chlorine Hydrocarbons Freons
Dust particles: Asbestos Coal dust Silicon oxide Metals
Metals: lead, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, etc. Organochlorine pesticides: DDT, aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane,
etc. Nitrates Phosphates Petroleum and petroleum products Organic solvents: toluene, benzene, etc.
Low molecular weight halogenated hydrocarbons: chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, dichloroethane, etc. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Polychlorinated biphenyls Dioxins Dibenzofurans Acids
82
5 . 2 . E c o t o x i c o k i n e t i c s
Ecotoxicokinetics is a branch of ecotoxicology that examines the fate of xenobiotics (ecopollutants) in the environment. This includes their sources, distribution in abiotic and biotic components of the environment, transformation in habitats, and elimination from the environment. The iden­tification of sources of pollutants is an essential element of their ecotoxico­logical characterization. Nevertheless, the contribution of some sources of toxicants to the xenobiotic profile of an ecosystem is negligible. Natural sources of bioavailable xenobiotics, according to WHO (1992), include wind-blown dust particles, sea salt aerosol, volcanic activity, forest fires, biogenic particles, and biogenic volatile substances. However, the im­portance of human activity as a source of xenobiotics in the environment is steadily rising.
Abiotic (occurring without the participation of living organisms) and biotic (occurring with the participation of living organisms) transformations of chemical substances into toxicants of different characteristics constitute a major source of xenobiotics in the environment. However, numerous abi­otic and biotic processes are aimed at eliminating (removing) xenobiotics from the environment.
In this regard, exposure time to many xenobiotics in the environment is negligible to cause any harmful effect. Substances that are resistant to de­composition processes, and, as a result, persist in the environment for a long time, are potentially harmful ecotoxicants (Table 5.2).
Table 5.2
Half-life of some xenobiotics in the environment
Xenobiotic
Half-life
Environment
DDT TCDD Atrazine Benzoperylene Phenanthrene Carbofuran Phosphorylthiocholines Mustard gas Sarin
10 years
9 years 25 months 14 months
138 days
45 days 21 days
7 days
4 hours
Soil Soil Water (рН 7.0) Soil Soil Water (рН 7.0) Soil (temp. 15 оC) Soil (temp. 15 оC) Soil (temp. 15 оC)
83
The constant release of persistent xenobiotics into the environment leads to their accumulation, becoming ecotoxicants for the most vulnerable (sensi­tive) individuals of the biosystem. Even after termination of the release of these toxicants, they continue to remain in the environment for a long time. For instance, the pesticide – mirex – the use of which was discontinued in the late 1970s, was still found twenty years later in high concentrations in Lake Ontario. In the waters of the US Air Force test site in Florida, where in 1962 to 1964, the Agent Orange was sprayed for research purposes, even after ten years, the sludge contained 10 to 35 ng/kg TCDD, which is hugely over the maximum permissible concentration of 0.1 pg/kg (US standards) or 10 pg/kg (Russian standards). Substances that persist in the environment for a long time include heavy metals, such as lead, copper, zinc, nickel, cadmium, cobalt, antimony, mercury, arsenic, and chromium; polycyclic polyhalogen­ated hydrocarbons, such as polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, dibenzofurans, polychlorinated biphenyls, etc.; and organochlorine pesticides, such as DDT, hexachlorane, aldrin, lindane, etc.; among many others. The characteristics and rate of the various processes of transformation of these substances deter­mine their persistence in the environment.
Abiotic transformation of xenobiotics in the environment involve various processes, including photolysis, hydrolysis, and oxidation. A common abiotic transformation involves the formation of nitroso compounds in the soil. In this regard, pesticides, such as dialkyl thiocarbamates, thiocarbamoyl disulfides, salts of phenoxyacetic acid, etc., combine with nitrites in an acidic condition to form nitroso compounds, which are known carcinogens. Photolysis is the pro­cess of degradation of chemical substances through the absorption of light, par­ticularly, ultraviolet rays that break down chemical bonds in compounds. For example, the photochemical transformations of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyace­tic acid (Fig. 5.1), a known herbicide, can lead to the formation of a hazardous ecopollutant – 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Photolysis takes place mainly in the atmosphere and on the surface of soil and water. The rate of photolysis depends on the intensity of light and the ability of the substance to absorb it. Unsaturated aromatic compounds, such as polycyclic aromatic hy­drocarbons (PAHs), are most sensitive to photolysis, due to their ability to ac­tively absorb light energy. Moreover, light accelerates other processes of deg­radation, such as hydrolysis and oxidation of substances. Likewise, the pres­ence of photo-oxidants, such as ozone, nitrogen oxides, formaldehyde, acrolein, and organic peroxides, significantly accelerates the process of photolysis of other xenobiotics. For instance, the photo-oxidation of parathion (Fig. 5.2) re­sults in the formation of paraoxon, the toxicity to mammals of which is several tens of times higher than that of parathion itself. Hydrolysis of xenobiotics is
84
their reaction with water to form two or more products. This involves ionization of water molecules and the splitting of the xenobiotic into other compounds. For example, the ester bonds in molecules of organophosphorus compounds are highly sensitive to the action of water, which explains the moderate resistance of these compounds in the environment. The rate of hydrolysis is highly de­pendent on pH, such that, extreme pH levels accelerate the ionization of water molecules, and thus, increasing the rate of hydrolytic reactions.
Fig. 5.1. Photolytic transformation of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (1)
and the abiotic synthesis of tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD)
Fig. 5.2. Abiotic transformation of parathion
85
Biotic degradation of chemical substances usually takes place at a higher rate than abiotic decomposition. With the participation of biota of an ecosystem, particularly, bacteria and fungi, the process of degradation of xenobiotics in the environment is much faster, due to the enzymatic activity of these microorganisms. The biotransformation of chemical substances in the environment involves processes of oxidation, hydrolysis, dehalogenation, cleavage of cyclic molecular structures, removal of alkyl radicals (dealkyla­tion), etc. The breakdown of a compound can result in its complete decom­position, i.e. mineralization with the formation of water, carbon dioxide, and other simple compounds. However, some intermediate products of biotrans­formation can have a higher toxicity than the original xenobiotic. For in­stance, the conversion of inorganic mercury compounds by phytoplankton can lead to the formation of more toxic organometallic compound – methyl­mercury. A practical example of this is the historical event of the Minamata Bay in Japan in the 1950s and 60s. Biotic transformation of mercury, that entered the water of the bay with the effluents of an industrial plant for the production of nitrogen compounds, resulted in the formation of methyl­mercury. The latter was concentrated in the tissues of marine organisms and fish, which served as food for the local population. As a result, people who consumed fish from the bay developed a complex neurological disorder, and newborns had birth defects. Over the years, tens of thousands of the people of Minamata have been reported to have neurological symptoms consistent with methylmercury poisoning.
Non-degradative elimination processes involve the removal of xeno­biotics from the environment without any transformation process. This alters the distribution of the xenobiotics in the ecosystem. A pollutant with a high vapor pressure can easily evaporate from water and soil, and move with the current of wind to a different environment. This phenomenon underlies the ubiquity of relatively volatile organochlorine insecticides, such as lindane and hexachlorobenzene. Redistribution of xenobiotics in the environment can occur through the movement by wind and atmospheric currents of parti­cles of soil on which the xenobiotics are adsorbed. Benzopyrene, for in­stance, and its related compounds of both natural (mainly volcanic) and an­thropogenic sources (emissions from metallurgical, oil refining, thermal power plants, etc.) are found in the biospheric cycle of substances, passing from one environment to another by wind currents. These are usually in as­sociation with solid particles of atmospheric dust. In this regard, fine dust of particles of 1 to 10 microns in size persist in the air for a long time, while
86
larger dust particles quickly settle on soil and into water. The ash from vol­canoes is one source of such particles, the distance of dispersion of which increases with increasing height of eruption.
Another non-degradative process involves the sorption of xenobiotics on suspended particles in water, followed by precipitation, leading to their elimination from the water, while accumulating with sedimentation at the bottom of the water.
Redistribution of water-soluble substances is facilitated by rainfall and groundwater movement. Atrazine – a herbicide, which is easily soluble in water, migrates to and accumulates in groundwater. It is quite persistent in the environment, having a half-life of 25 months. Thus, atrazine is found to be common in surface waters of several countries, where the herbicide is used for the control of broadleaf weeds in agriculture and parks.
Bioaccumulation is the process by which living organisms accumulate toxicants by extracting them from the abiotic phase (water, soil, air) and food (trophic transmission). If an environmental pollutant cannot enter the body, it usually does not pose a significant risk to the organism. However, once in the internal environment, many xenobiotics are able to accumulate in the tis­sues. This has detrimental consequences for the organism that is accumulat­ing the xenobiotic, reaching a damaging concentration in critical tissues, as well as for other organisms that feed on the tissues with accumulated xeno­biotics. Aquatic environments provide the best conditions for bioaccumula­tion of compounds. It is home to myriads of aquatic organisms that have the ability to extract toxicants, that are capable of cumulation. Aquatic or­ganisms accumulate substances in concentrations, sometimes thousands of times higher than those contained in their habitat (Table 5.3).
The propensity of an ecotoxicant to bioaccumulate depends on a number of factors, including its persistence in the environment. The de­gree of accumulation of a substance in the body is determined by its con­centration in the environment. Substances that are easily eliminated from the environment poorly accumulate in biological systems; except in the case of chronic release of the substance into the environment, particu­larly, in industrial quantities. Although hydrocyanic acid is a known toxic compound, it is not considered a potentially dangerous ecotoxicant, due to its high volatility and thus, easy elimination from the atmosphere. How­ever, it has not been possible to completely exclude that certain types of diseases and pregnancy disorders in women living near gold mining
87
enterprises, where cyanides are used in huge quantities, are not associated with the chronic effect of the substance.
Table 5.3
Bioaccumulation of some xenobiotics in fish
Xenobiotic
Bioaccumulation factor
DDT TCDD Endrin
Pentachlorobenzene
Leptophos
Trichlorobenzene
127000
39000
6800 5000
750 183
After the entry of substances into the body, their fate is determined by toxicokinetic processes. Fat-soluble (lipophilic) substances, that slowly metabolize in the body, have the highest ability to bioaccumulate. Indeed, the adipose tissue is the main site of long-term deposition of xenobiotics. Thus, many years after exposure, a high amount of TCDD was found in biopsy specimens of adipose tissue and blood plasma of US Army veter­ans, who participated in the Vietnam War. Many lipophilic substances, however, are prone to sorption on the surfaces of various particles, that precipitate from water and air, reducing their bioavailability. The sorption of benzopyrene with humic acids, for instance, reduces the toxicants abil­ity to bioaccumulate in fish tissues by three times. In fact, fish from water bodies with a low amount of suspended particles in the water accumulate greater amounts of DDT than fish from eutrophic water bodies with a high amount of suspended materials. Substances metabolizing in the body ac­cumulate in smaller quantities than would be expected based on their phys­icochemical properties (Table 5.4). The differences in bioaccumulation factors of xenobiotics are largely determined by the characteristics of me­tabolism in different species. Bioaccumulation may underlie not only chronic, but also delayed acute toxic effects. For instance, the rapid loss of fat, in which a large amount of the substance is accumulated, leads to the release of the toxicant into the blood with the consequence of delayed toxic effect. Practically, mobilization of adipose tissue in animals is often observed during their breeding season. In ecologically disadvantaged re­gions, this may be accompanied by mass death of animals when they reach puberty.
88
Table 5.4
Real and calculated bioaccumulation factors of some toxicants
in fish tissues
Toxicant
Intensity of
biotransformati
on
Bioaccumulation factor
Calculated
Real
Chlordane Polychlorinated biphenyls Mirex Pentachlorophenol 2,3-Dibromopropyl phosphate
Low Low
Low High High
47900 36300 21900
4900 4570
38000 42600 18200
780
3
Biomagnification is the phenomenon by which the concentration of xenobiotics increases along food chains. Chemical substances can move along food chains from “victim organisms” to “consumer organisms”. For highly lipophilic substances, this movement may be accompanied by an increase in the concentration of the toxicant in the tissues of each subsequent organism – a link in the food chain. In a case of DDT used against mosquitoes on a lake in California, the pesticide content in the water was 0.02 parts per million (ppm). After some time, DDT was determined in plankton at a con­centration of 10 ppm, in the tissues of planktivorous fish – 900 ppm, preda­tory fish – 2700 ppm, birds feeding on fish – 21000 ppm. Thus, the amount of DDT in the tissues of birds not directly exposed to the pesticide was 1,000,000 times higher than in water and 20 times higher than in the body of fish – the first link in the food chain.
5 . 3 . E c o t o x i c o d y n a m i c s
Ecotoxicodynamics is a section of ecotoxicology that entails the study of specific mechanisms of toxic processes, caused by ecotoxicants on the bi­ocenosis and/or the individual species in it. The mechanisms by which chem­ical substances can cause adverse effects in biogeocenoses are numerous and, probably, in each case, unique. The impact of these chemical substances can be classified as direct, indirect and mixed effects of ecotoxicants. The direct effect of an ecotoxicant or a set of ecotoxicants of a given xenobiotic profile is the immediate damage caused by the toxicant(s) to organisms of a partic­ular population or several populations of a biocenosis. An example of
89
substances with direct mechanism of action on humans is cadmium. This metal accumulates in the body even at minimum concentrations in the envi­ronment, and at a critical concentration, it initiates a toxic process, that is characterized by immunosuppression, carcinogenesis, as well as damage to the respiratory system and kidneys. The indirect effect of the xenobiotic pro­file of an environment on biotic and abiotic components of a habitat is the im­pact on the conditions and resources of the environment, leading to their in­adequacy for the optimal existence of the ecosystem. Many toxicants can have both direct and indirect effects; referred to as a mixed effect. For exam­ple, the Agent Orange used by the US Army in Vietnam was a mixture of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoacetic acid with traces of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Its widespread use in Vietnam caused significant damage to the flora and fauna of the country and directly to human health.
Ecotoxicity is the ability of a given xenobiotic profile of an environ­ment to cause adverse effects in a given biocenosis. However, ecotoxicity may refer to a single xenobiotic, if the disruption of the natural xenobiotic profile of an ecosystem is caused by excessive accumulation of that particular xenobiotic in the environment. Ecotoxic effects of xenobiotics can be cate­gorized according to the levels of organization of biological systems as fol­lows:
– at the organismic level (autotoxic effect) – observed as a decrease in resistance to other active environmental factors, decrease in activity, ill­nesses, carcinogenesis, reproductive disorders, death of organism, etc.;
– at the population level (demographic ecotoxic effect) – observed as death of a population, increase in morbidity and mortality, decrease in birth rate, increase in number of birth defects, disruption of demographic charac­teristics (age and sex ratio, etc.), reduction in life expectancy, cultural degra­dation;
– at the level of biogeocenosis (ecosystemic toxic effect) – manifests as change in the population spectrum of a biocenosis up to the extinction of certain species and the emergence of new ones that are not peculiar to the par­ticular biocenosis, disruption of inter-species relationships.
Ecosystem-level toxicity can also be categorized into acute and chronic ecotoxicity, based on the duration of toxic effects of ecotoxicants on an eco­system.
Acute ecotoxicity entails the toxic effect of ecotoxicants on a bioceno­sis as a result of accidents and disasters, accompanied by the release into the environment of a large amount of a relatively unstable toxicant or
90
improper use of the toxicant. The use of highly toxic chemicals for military purposes has been one of the leading causes of environmental disasters. Dur­ing the First World War, for instance, belligerent countries used about 120 thousand tons of toxic substances on the battlefields, resulting into more than 1.3 million cases of poisoning, a situation that can be considered as one of the biggest environmental disasters in human history. Acute ecotoxic ef­fects may result in immediate death or illness in humans and other species, or in the development of neoplasms, leading to delayed effects.
Chronic ecotoxicity of chemical substances is usually associated with sublethal effects. Often, this implies reproductive dysfunction, breakdown of immunity, endocrine pathology, malformations, allergies, etc. Chronic expo­sure to a toxicant can also lead to deaths in some species of living organisms. The effect of ecotoxicants can be very diverse, as numerous examples of their mechanisms of action are given to enable the assessment of the complexity of their impact on ecosystems.
The use of effective pesticides, such as insecticides and herbicides is an application of the strategy of direct effect of toxicants, leading to mass death of sensitive species. Nevertheless, concomitant negative phenomena arise in some cases of this scientific application. For example, methylmercuric dicy­anamide was widely used in Sweden in the 1950s and 60s as a fungicide for the treatment of seeds of grain crops. This resulted in the concentration of 10 mg/kg of mercury in the grain seeds. After a few years, a massive death of pheasants, pigeons, partridges and other grain-eating birds from chronic mercury intoxication occurred as a result of periodic pecking of treated seeds by the birds. However, environmental assessments involve the application of the basic principle that, sensitivity to a chemical substance varies for differ­ent species of living organisms.
Therefore, the presence of a toxicant in the environment, even in small quantities, can be detrimental to the most sensitive species but not to others within the same ecosystem. For instance, 0.01 mg/L of lead chloride in water leads to death of daphnia within a period of one day, but is of little harm to other aquatic species.
The accumulation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in seals, result­ing into a decrease in their resistance to infection is a direct effect of a xeno- biotic, leading to the development of a toxic process. At the end of the 1980s, about 18,000 seals died as a result of viral infections in the Baltic, North and Irish Seas. A high concentration of PCBs was found in the tissues of the dead seals. Like other chlorine-containing compounds, such as DDT, hexachloro­benzene and dieldrin, PCBs have an immunosuppressive effect on mammals.
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]