Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Fundamentals of Toxicology. Tutorial

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
07.09.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
Their accumulation in the body led to a reduction in the seals resistance to infection. Thus, without directly causing death of the animals, the pollutant significantly increased their sensitivity to the effect of other adverse environ­mental factors. This form of ecotoxic effect is seen in the case of an increase in the development of neoplasms, and a reduction of reproductive function in populations of people living in the regions of South Vietnam, contami­nated with ecotoxicants from warfare.
Embryotoxic effects of ecopollutants refer to the impact of various xe­nobiotics (including medicinal substances) on human and other mammalian embryos, as well as on the eggs of monotremes, insects, birds, reptiles and amphibians. For example, the accumulation of DDT in the tissues of birds, such as mallard, osprey, bald eagle, etc., leads to thinning of the eggshell, disruption of embryonic development and unhatched eggs. This is accompa­nied by a reduction in bird populations.
The toxic effect of many xenobiotics is due to the direct toxic effect of metabolites of the xenobiotic. Field observations of freshwater viviparous fish in Florida revealed populations of a large number of females with signs of masculinization in peculiar behavior, modification of fins, etc. These pop­ulations were found in a river below the wastewater flow of a nut processing plant, the effluents of which did not contain any masculinizing substances.
However, the wastewater of the plant contained phytosterone, formed during processing of the raw materials. Subsequently, biotransformation of phytosterone by some bacteria in the river produced androgens (Fig. 5.3), which caused the masculinization effect in these fishes.
Fig. 5.3. Conversion of phytosterol into androgen by microorganisms
The indirect toxic effect by reduction of food resources in an ecosystem was experienced in Canada, where the forestry application of organophos­phorus pesticides to control caterpillars and insects resulted into a sharp
91
decline in the number of caterpillars and insects. This caused millions of birds to die from starvation.
Population explosion due to destruction of competitive species: After the use of synthetic pesticides to control some plant pests in the United States, a previously small number of cotton mite species began to multiply inten­sively. This phenomenon is based on the fact that, the use of the synthetic pesticides resulted in the death of predators of cotton mite. Thus, the eco­toxic effect of xenobiotics in the environment can result in the destruction of the natural population control systems in an ecosystem.
Q u e s t i o n s & A s s i g n m e n t s
1. Discuss the concept of ecotoxicology.
2. Describe the xenobiotic profile of an environment.
3. Explain the role of abiotic transformation of ecotoxicants.
4. Explain the principles of biotic transformation of xenobiotics.
5. Outline the mechanisms of bioaccumulation.
6. What are the reasons for biomagnifications?
7. What is ecotoxicokinetics?
8. What is ecotoxicodynamics?
92
C O N C L U S I O N
The development of industry is inextricably linked with the expansion of the range of chemicals being used currently for various purposes. Modern development of production and agriculture is characterized by rising appli­cations of pesticides, fertilizers and other chemical substances. This is the ob­jective reason for the steady rise in chemical hazard to the environment, which lurks in the very nature of human activity.
Modern scientific, technical and socio-economic development involves processes of excessive exploitation of natural resources; degradation of eco­systems; high generation, disposal, and accumulation of waste. These situa­tions lead to increasing environmental risks and undermine public health.
Indeed, chemical substances from industrial activity that disrupt the equilibrium of ecosystems are inevitably released into the biosphere. Besides industry, some of the very serious environmental disasters in human history are associated with chemical warfare. Environmental and economic policies in different countries of the world must redefine economic activity in an en­vironmentally acceptable manner towards transition to socio-ecological sat­isfaction of material needs. The transformation of xenobiotics in the environ­ment under conditions of external influence is a natural process of removal of toxicants from ecosystems. Nevertheless, the products of some of the transformation processes tend to be even more toxic than their initial par­ent substances.
Thus, toxicology occupies an important position in the block of natural science disciplines, taught to future environmental engineers and chemical technologists. The subject explores the principles of interaction between liv­ing organisms and toxicants; identification of the mechanisms of toxic effects of harmful substances; and the characteristics of different forms of pollution of the biosphere. This knowledge is important for the achievement of sus­tainability of common practical activities, as well as applications of scientific advancement.
93
L I T E R A T U R E
1. Albert, A. Selective toxicity / А. Albert. – London, New York: Chap-
man and Hall, 1985. – 565 p.
2. Gupta, P. K. Fundamentals of Toxicology. Essential Concepts and
Applications / P. K. Gupta. – Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier,
2016. – 398 p.
3. Duffus John H., Worth Howard G. J. Fundamentals of Toxicology.
Royal Society of Chemistry, 2006. – 516 p.
4. Flanagan R. J, Braithwaite R. A, Brown S. S, Widdop B, Wolff F. A. Basic analytical toxicology. World Health Organization, 1995. – 274 р.
5. Nebert D. W., Roe A. L. Ethnic and genetic differences in metabo­lism genes and risk of toxicity and canser / // Sci. Total Environ. – 2001. – V. 274. – P. 93-102.
6. Nebert D.W., Carvan III M.J. Ecogenetics: from ecology to health. // Toxicol. Industr. Health. – 1997. – V. 13. – P. 163-192.
7. Miller T. Living in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions. Cengage Learning, 2006. – 784 р.
8. Исидоров, В. А. Введение в химическую экотоксикологию / В. А. Исидоров. – Санкт-Петербург: Химиздат, 1999. – 142 с.
9. Куценко, С. А. Основы токсикологии / С. А. Куценко. – Санкт- Петербург: Фолиант, 2004. – 720 с.
10. Курляндский, Б. А. Общая токсикология. / Б. А. Курляндский, В. А. Филов. – Москва: Медицина, 2002. – 607 с.
11. Химическая безопасность и мониторинг живых систем на
принципах биомиметики / Г. К. Будников, С. Ю. Гармонов, Э. П. Ме­дянцева, Г. А. Евтюгин – Москва: ИНФРА-М, 2013. – 320 с.
94
EDUCATIONAL EDITION
ОСНОВЫ ТОКСИКОЛОГИИ
Editor L. Shevchuk
Computer layout – A. Rakhmankulova
Sergey Garmonov
Lawrence Nugbienyo
FUNDAMENTALS OF TOXICOLOGY
Сергей Юрьевич Гармонов
Лоуренс Кабла Адану Бамиделе Нугбиеньо
95
Signed in print 30.12.2023
Sheet size 60×84 1/16
Offset paper
Digital print
5,58 conv. pr. sh.
6,0 publ. sh.
Edition 400 copies
Order 189/23
Kazan National Research Technological University Press
Offset laboratory of Kazan National Research Technological University
420015, Kazan, Karl Marx street, 68
96
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]