Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_112_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
05.09.2026
Размер:
18 Мб
Скачать
programmes. Med Educ. 1996 Mar;30(2):83-89. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00724.x.
80. Noel GL, Herbers JE, Caplow MP, Cooper GS, Pangaro LN, Harvey J. How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents? Ann Intern Med. 1992 Nov 1;117(9):757-765. doi:10.7326/0003-
4819-117-9-757.
81. Regehr G, Freeman R, Robb A, Missiha N, Heisey R. OSCE performance evaluations made by standardized patients: comparing checklist and global rating scores. Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10 Suppl):S135-S137. doi:10.1097/00001888-199910000-00064.
82. Norcini J, Boulet J. Methodological issues in the use of standardized patients for assessment. Teach Learn Med. 2003 Fall;15(4):293-297. doi:10.1207/S15328015TLM1504_12.
83. Tavares W, Eva KW. Impact of rating demands on rater-based assessments of clinical competence. Educ Prim Care. 2014 Nov;25(6):308-318. doi:10.1080/14739879.2014.11730760.
84. Tavares W, Ginsburg S, Eva KW. Selecting and simplifying: rater performance and behavior when considering multiple competencies. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):41-
51. doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1107489.
85. Tavares W, Eva KW. Exploring the impact of mental workload on rater-based assessments.
https://t.me/med1917
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 May;18(2):291-303. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-
9370-3.
86. Paravattil H, Wilby KJ. Optimizing assessors’ mental workload in rater-based assessment: a critical narrative review. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Dec;8(6):339-345. doi:10.1007/s40037-019-
00535-6.
87. Donato AA, Pangaro L, Smith C., et al. Evaluation of a novel assessment form for observing medical residents: a randomised, controlled trial. Med Educ. 2008 Dec;42(12):1234-1242. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2923.2008.03230.x.
88. Donato AA, Park YS, George DL, Schwartz A, Yudkowsky R. Validity and feasibility of the minicard direct observation tool in 1 training program. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Jun;7(2):225-
229. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00532.1.
89. Weller JM, Misur M, Nicolson S, et al. Can I leave the theatre? A key to more reliable workplace-based assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1083-1091. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu052.
90. Duijn CCMA, van Dijk EJ, Mandoki M, Bok HGJ, Cate OTJT. Assessment tools for feedback and entrustment decisions in the clinical workplace: a systematic review. J Vet Med Educ. 2019 Fall;46(3):340-52. doi:10.3138/jvme.0917-123r.
91. Rekman J, Gofton W, Dudek N, Gofton T,
https://t.me/med1917
Hamstra SJ. Entrustability scales: outlining their usefulness for competency-based clinical assessment. Acad Med. 2015 Feb;91(2):186-190. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001045.
92. Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, Wade W. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Med Educ. 2011 Jun;45(6):560-569. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2923.2010.03913.x.
93. Ten Cate O, Schwartz A, Chen HC. Assessing trainees and making entrustment decisions: on the nature and use of entrustment-supervision scales. Acad Med. 2020 Nov;95(11):1662-1669. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003427.
94. Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Sall D, et al. A reliability analysis of entrustment-derived workplace-based assessments. Acad Med. 2020 Apr;95(4):616-622. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002997.
95. Dudek N, Gofton W, Rekman J, McDougall A. Faculty and resident perspectives on using entrustment anchors for workplace-based assessment. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Jun;11(3):287-294. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-18-
01003.1.
96. Hatala R, Ginsburg S, Hauer KE, Gingerich A. Entrustment ratings in internal medicine training: capturing meaningful supervision decisions or just another rating? J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):740-743.
https://t.me/med1917
doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04878-y.
97. Kinnear B, Warm E, Caretta-Eyer H, et al. Entrustment unpacked: aligning purposes, stakes, and processes to enhance learner assessment. Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7S):S56­S63. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004108.
98. Gingerich A, Daniels V, Farrell L, Olsen SR, Kennedy T, Hatala R. Beyond hands-on and hands-off: supervisory approaches and entrustment on the inpatient ward. Med Educ. 2018 Oct;52(10):1028-1040. doi:10.1111/medu.13621.
99. Kogan JR, Dine CJ, Conforti LN, et al. Can rater training improve the quality and accuracy of workplace-based assessment narrative comments and entrustment ratings? A randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2023 Feb 1;98(2):237-247. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004819.
100. Ryan MS, Khamishon R, Richards A, Perera R, Garber A, Santen SA. A question of scale? Generalizability of the Ottawa and Chen scales to render entrustment decisions for the core EPAs in the workplace. Acad Med. 2022 Apr 1;97(4):552-561. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004189.
101. Hatala R, Sawatsky AP, Dudek N, Ginsburg S, Cook DA. Using in-training evaluation report ITER) qualitative comments to assess medical students and residents: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):868-879.
https://t.me/med1917
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001506.
102. Young JQ, Sugarman R, Holmboe E, O’Sullivan PS. Advancing our understanding of narrative comments generated by direct observation tools: lessons from psychopharmacology-structured clinical observation. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Oct;11(5):570-579. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-19-
00207.1.
103. Ginsberg S, Watling CJ, Schumacher DJ, Gingerich A, Hatala R. Numbers encapsulate, words elaborate: towards the best use of comments for assessment and feedback on entrustment ratings. Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7S):S81-S86. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004089.
104. Martin L, Sibbald M, Vegas DB, Russell D, Govaerts M. The impact of entrustment assessments on feedback and learning: trainee perspectives. Med Educ. 2020 Apr;54(4):328-
336. doi:10.1111/medu.14047.
105. Scarff CE, Bearman M, Chiavaroli N, Trumble S. Trainees' perceptions of assessment messages: a narrative systematic review. Med Educ. 2019 Mar;53(3):221-233. doi:10.1111/medu.13775.
106. Herbers JE, Noel GL, Cooper GS, Harvey J, Pangaro LN, Weaver MJ. How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1989 May-Jun;4(3):202-208. doi:10.1007/BF02599524.
https://t.me/med1917
107. Kalet A, Earp JA, Kowlowitz V. How well do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of medical students? J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Sep­Oct;7(5):499-505. doi:10.1007/BF02599452.
108. Elliot DL, Hickam DH. Evaluation of physical examination skills. Reliability of faculty observers and patient instructors. JAMA. 1987 Dec 18;258(23):3405-3408.
109. Gauthier G, St-Onge C, Tavares W. Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings. Med Educ. 2016 May;50(5):511-522. doi:10.1111/medu.12973.
110. Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. Seeing the ‘black box’ differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1055-
1068. doi:10.1111/medu.12546.
111. Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe E. Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model. Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1048-1060. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04025.x.
112. Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. Seeing the same thing differently: mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly­observed performance assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Aug;18(3):325-341. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9372-1.
113. Govaerts MJ, Van de Wiel MW, Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM. Workplace-based assessment: raters’
https://t.me/med1917
performance theories and constructs. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Aug;18(3):375-396. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-
9376-x.
114. Berendonk C, Stalmeijer RE, Schuwirth LW. Expertise in performance assessment: assessors’ perspectives. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Oct;18(4):559-571. doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9392-x.
115. Paauw DS, Wenrich MD, Curtis JR, Carline JD, Ramsey PG. Ability of primary care physicians to recognize physical findings associated with HIV infection. JAMA. 1995 Nov 1;274(17):1380-1382.
116. Kogan JR, Hess BJ, Conforti LN, Holmboe ES. What drives faculty ratings of residents’ clinical skills? The impact of faculty’s own clinical skills. Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(S10):S25­S28. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed1aa3.
117. Govaerts MJ, Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP, Muijtjens AM. Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 May;16(2):151-165. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-
9250-7.
118. Friedman Z, Bould MD, Matava C, Alam H. Investigating faculty assessment of anesthesia trainees and the failing-to-fail phenomenon: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;68(7):1000-1007. doi:10.1007/s12630-
021-01971-x.
https://t.me/med1917
119. Swails JL, Gadgil MA, Goodrum H, Gupta R, Rahbar MH, Bernstam EV. Role of faculty characteristics in failing to fail in clinical clerkships. Med Educ. 2022 Jun;56(6):634-640. doi:10.1111/medu.14725.
120. Dudek NL, Marks MB, Regehr G. Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors. Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S84-S87. doi:10.1097/00001888-200510001-00023.
121. Cleland JA, Knight LV, Rees CE, Tracey S, Bond CM. Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):800-809. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03113.x.
122. Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva KW. Effect of exposure to good vs poor medical trainee performance on attending physician ratings of subsequent performances. JAMA. 2012 Dec 5;308(21):2226-2232. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.36515.
123. Yeates P, O’Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. ‘You’re certainly relatively competent’: assessor bias due to recent experiences. Med Educ. 2013 Sep;47(9):910-922. doi:10.1111/medu.12254.
124. Yeates P, Cardell J, Byrne G, Eva KW. Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors’ scores and narrative feedback. Med Educ. 2015 Sep;49(9):909-919. doi:10.1111/medu.12777.
125. Gingerich A, Schokking E, Yeates P.
https://t.me/med1917
of preceding performances on assessors' focus and interpretations in written assessment comments. Adv Heath Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;23(5):937-959. doi:10.1007/s10459-018-
9841-2.
126. Hagiwara N, Kron FW, Scerbo MW, Watson GS. A call for grounding implicit bias training in clinical and translational frameworks. Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1457-1460. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30846-1.
127. Teherani A, Hauer KE, Fernandez A, King TE Jr, Lucey C. How small differences in assessed clinical performance amplify to large differences in grades and awards: a cascade with serious consequences for students underrepresented in medicine. Acad Med. 2018 Sep;93(9):1286-1292. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002323.
128. Klein R, Ufere NN, Schaeffer S, et al. Association between resident race and ethnicity and clinical performance assessment scores in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 2022 Sep 1;97(9):1351-1359. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004743.
129. Low D, Pollack SW, Liao ZC, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school. Teach Learn Med. 2019 Oct­Dec;31(5):487-496. doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1597724.
130. Arkin N, Lai C, Kiwakyou LM, et al. What’s in a word? Qualitative and quantitative
https://t.me/med1917
analysis of leadership language in anesthesiology resident feedback. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Feb;11(1):44-52. doi:10.4300/JGME-
D-18-00377.1.
131. Mueller AS, Jenkins TM, Osborne M, Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender differences in attending physicians’ feedback to residents: a qualitative analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):577-585. doi:10.4300/JGME-
D-17-00126.1.
132. Klein R, Julian KA, Snyder ED, et al. Gender bias in resident assessment in graduate medical education: review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):712-719. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04884-0.
133. Li S, Fant AL, McCarthy DM, Miller D, Craig J, Kontrick A. Gender differences in language of standardized letter of evaluation narratives for emergency medicine residency applicants. AEM Educ Train. 2017 Sep 19;1(4):334-339. doi:10.1002/aet2.10057.
134. Chen S, Beck Dallaghan GL, Shaheen A. Implicit gender bias in third-year surgery clerkship MSPE narratives. J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1136-1143. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.011.
135. Khan S, Kirubarajan A, Shamsheri T, Clayton A, Mehta G. Gender bias in reference letters for residency and academic medicine: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2023 May 22;99(1170):272-278. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-
https://t.me/med1917