Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1134_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
19 Мб
Скачать
420
Fig. 36.4 Frequency of factors
associated with severe maternal morbidity (SMM). PPH postpartum hemorrhage, HTN D / O hypertensive disorders, VTE venous thromboembolism [
C. Oxford and M. La Rosa
Frequency of factors associated with SMM
0.60 %
0.60 %
1.20 %
8 ]
2.40 %
1.20 %
6.00 %
0.60 %
19.00 %
20.50 %
PPH VTE
Table 36.2 MEOWS score [ 10 ]
3 2 1 0 1 2 3 Systolic BP <80 80–89 90–139 140–149 150–159 ≥160 Diastolic BP <90 90–99 100–109 ≥110 Respiratory rate <10 10.0–17 18–24 25–29 ≥30 Heart rate <60 60–110 111–149 ≥150
requirement Room air 24–39 % 40 %
O
2
Temperature <34 34–35 35.1–37.9 38–38.9 ≥39 Conscious level Alert Not alert
HTN D/O Trauma
Acute Cardiopulm Infection Preexisting Medical
47.60 %
AFE/AFLPLatrogenicAcute Neuro

Predictors of Mortality at Admission

In nonpregnant patients, prediction models have been used to determine the risk of death at admission to the ICU. Among nonpregnant women, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), the Simplifi ed Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), and the Mortality Predictor Model (MPM) have demonstrated reliable predictive values. None of these perform well in the obstetric population. The main reason for the poor performance in gravid and recently postpartum patients is that they do not account for the normal physiologic changes of pregnancy or include markers for pregnancy-associated conditions such as HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet syndrome) and often overestimate the risk of maternal mortality [ Infl ammatory Response Syndrome and Modifi ed Early Warning scores are 0.9–1.7 and 0.05, respectively, in obstetric patients and cannot be used to reliably predict ICU transfer, sepsis, or death in pregnant women.
For this reason, in the United Kingdom (UK), a Modifi ed
Early Obstetric Warning System (MEOWS) was created
9 ]. The positive predictive values of the Systemic
(Table 36.2 ). This tool was developed to better identify women in risk of clinical deterioration. The area under the curve was
0.96 (95 % CI 0.94–0.96) for the clinical score [ 10 ]. With a universal SMM defi nition by the Joint
Commission and recent advancements in medical technol­ogy with machine-based learning, hospital systems can develop reliable electronic track and trigger Obstetric Early Warning Systems to respond to early signs of maternal clin­ical deterioration in an effort to reduce progression of maternal morbidity to mortality and can be anticipated to impact other outcomes like maternal length of stay and readmission rates.

Physiologic Changes in Obstetrics and Clinical Implications

There are well-known physiologic changes during pregnancy that can affect the management of a patient in the ICU. Understanding these alterations during pregnancy is a very important tool to improve maternal and fetal outcomes and inform management of the critically ill mother.
36 Intensive Care in Obstetrics
421

Cardiovascular

During a normal pregnancy, there is a signifi cant increase of the blood volume starting at 8 weeks of gestation. During the fi rst two trimesters, the stroke volume and cardiac output increase [ approximately 30–50 % in singletons and 50–70 % in multiple- gestation pregnancies. There is a concomitant decrease in the systemic vascular resistance (SVR, mediated by progesterone) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) on the order of 20 % and 34 %, respectively. The increased volume and cardiac output do not compensate for the dra­matic decrease in SVR, and, as a result, blood pressure decreases in pregnancy. The blood pressure starts to decrease as early as 8 weeks, with its nadir in the midtrimester. The diastolic blood pressure and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) are the most affected during pregnancy. As blood volume increases during the course of pregnancy, maternal blood pressure approaches that of the woman’s prepregnancy levels. An important concept to keep in mind is that blood pressure during pregnancy should not be equal or higher than prepregnancy [ of pregnancy are most often the explanation.
(CVP) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) despite the increase in volume, due to the marked progesterone- mediated decrease in PVR. On the other hand, there is a decrease in colloidal oncotic pressure, making pul­monary edema more common. Women with preeclampsia are prone to the development of non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema because of decreased colloid oncotic pressure and increased capillary permeability with increased hydrostatic pressure. Preeclamptic patients may experience very high afterload at a rate and magnitude far exceeding their baseline SVR that can lead to cardiogenic pulmonary edema as well which can be diffi cult to distinguish from peripartum cardio­myopathy. Any peripartum patient with pulmonary edema and preeclampsia should be evaluated with a transthoracic echocardiogram to distinguish cardiogenic from non­cardiogenic causes.
trophy occur, refl ected in the EKG as left ventricular hyper­trophy (wall mass increases up to 50 %) and slight left axis deviation. Encroachment of the gravid uterus on the dia­phragm also physically shifts the heart in a more leftward direction which also contributes to the left axis deviation seen on EKG. A right axis deviation on EKG is not normal in pregnancy and should be further investigated if noted. On chest X-ray, an increased cardiac silhouette, straightening of the border of the left side of the heart, and prominence of the pulmonary conus are seen. All the chambers, in particular the left atrium, increase in size, making arrhythmias more common. Finally, there is a mild physiologic pulmonary and tricuspid regurgitation due to overall cardiac enlargement
11 ]. The cardiac output in pregnancy increases
12 , 13 ]. When it does, hypertensive disorders
There is almost no change in the central venous pressure
During pregnancy, cardiac remodeling and cellular hyper-
from volume engorgement that occurs with the hypervol­emic state of pregnancy [ 14 ].
Starting around 20 weeks of gestational age, the uterus is
large enough to cause compression of the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) resulting in supine hypotensive syndrome. This phenomenon can cause reduced venous return leading to a 30 % decrease in cardiac output and drop in blood pres­sure when a gravid patient beyond 20 weeks (or less with multiple gestations) lies directly fl at on her back. A lateral tilt relieves aortocaval compression and rapidly improves cardiac output [ 15 ].
Based on these particular effects during pregnancy, the
American Heart Association (AHA) recommends the fol­lowing variants when performing the Advanced Critical Life Support (ACLS) on gravidas with a 20-week or more sized uterus [ 1618 ]:
• Lateral uterine displacement
• Avoid medications through lower-extremity vascular access as they may not circulate.
The amount of blood going to the uterus increases with
each trimester. In nonpregnant women, only 2 % of the car­diac output reaches the uterus. However, by the third trimes­ter, 20 % of the cardiac output is shunted to the uteroplacental circulation. This translates to ~500–700 cc per minute and explains the massive amount of bleeding that can occur in a very short period of time in postpartum hemorrhage. During labor and immediately postpartum, ~300–500 cc of blood are added to the maternal circulation from the uteroplacental unit. This “autotransfusion” of labor and dramatic increases in cardiac output put women with cardiac conditions (par­ticularly valvular disease and pulmonary HTN or stenosis) at risks for pump failure and arrhythmias, which warrant close monitoring intrapartum and during the immediate postpar­tum period. Cardiac output (CO) increases throughout labor from 17 to 34 % above the baseline nonlaboring state and is attenuated in women with regional anesthesia. Obstetricians take advantage of the hemodynamic attenuation afforded with regional anesthesia in laboring women with known car­diac conditions to allow candidacy for vaginal delivery. The cardiac output returns to normal around 12 weeks postpar­tum [ 19 , 20 ].
Heart rate increases slightly in pregnancy as a compensa-
tion for the low SVR, to maintain cardiac output, as early as 7 weeks and increases about 10–20 % above baseline by term. Tachycardia above this level can be deleterious in women with certain conditions. For example, in mitral steno­sis, when the valve area falls below 1.5 cm 2 , fi lling of the left ventricle during diastole is compromised and results in a fi xed cardiac output. These women rely on diastolic fi lling which is heart rate dependent. Maternal tachycardia can severely limit LV fi lling in these patients, compromising the ability to maintain a normal BP, and can result in cardiogenic
422
C. Oxford and M. La Rosa
pulmonary edema and shock as well as poor uteroplacental blood fl ow leading to potentially harmful fetal effects.
During the second stage of labor, when delivery occurs, a healthy mother can lose up to 30 % of her blood volume with little or no change in hemodynamics or hematocrit. This is due to the gestational hypervolemia that occurs in pregnancy. The average blood loss during vaginal delivery is ~500 cc and 1,000 cc with cesarean section. Women with hyperten­sive disorders of pregnancy, particularly severe preeclamp­sia, do not expand their blood volume as robustly as normal gravidas and will show signs of shock earlier with less blood loss. Postpartum, there is a mobilization of extracellular fl uid accumulated in pregnancy to the intravascular space and an expected diuresis that occurs on days 2–3 in vaginal deliver­ies and 4–5 with cesarean sections. Failure to have the nor­mal postpartum diuresis may lead to high intravascular volume and pressure resulting in cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Invasive Central Monitoring

Pulmonary artery (PA) catheterization is used less commonly in the ICU as compared to the past and is being replaced by less-invasive imaging methods (echocardiogram, IVC ultra­sound, arterial pressure waveform monitors) to monitor hemodynamics in critically ill patients. It should be empha­sized however that a randomized control trial was performed showing no survival benefi t in pregnant women with PA catheter due to the poor correlation between the central venous pressure and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in pregnant women, in particular if patient has preeclampsia [ 21 ]. That being said, there remain indications for PA cathe- ter placement during pregnancy [ 22 ]:
• Hypovolemic shock unresponsive to initial volume resus-
citation attempts
• Septic shock with refractory hypotension or oliguria
• Severe preeclampsia with refractory oliguria or pulmo-
nary edema
• Ineffective intravenous antihypertensive therapy
• Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
• Intraoperative or intrapartum cardiac failure
• Severe mitral or aortic valve stenosis
• New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV
heart disease in labor
• Amniotic fl uid embolism
• Adult congenital heart disease
The logistics of invasive monitoring on labor and delivery can be very challenging due to limited staff available to trou­bleshoot and interpret data, equipment for monitoring, and locations where monitors may be available (can be logistically impossible to labor a woman in the OR who needs central monitoring in most hospitals with obstetric services). Oftentimes as a result, women who may benefi t from invasive monitoring who are in a location without this capability will end up delivering via cesarean or having a vaginal delivery without monitoring.

Pulmonary

There are structural and mechanical respiratory changes in pregnancy. Regarding the structural changes, the nasophar­ynx becomes edematous with increased mucous secretion resulting in reduced upper airway dimensions. These changes make endotracheal intubation more challenging, and low threshold for early intubation is highly recommended as one can anticipate a diffi cult airway in pregnancy. Because of anticipated oropharyngeal edema, the internal diameter of the endotracheal tube used for intubation of a pregnant patient should be 0.5–1.0 mm smaller than in nonpregnant women [ 23 , 24 ].
There are also some changes in the structure of the thorax. The subcostal angle increases from 68° to 103° (an ~50 % increase), the transverse diameter of the thorax increases by 2 cm, and the circumference increases by 5 cm. There is also decreased chest wall compliance.
The mechanical respiratory changes are described in Table 36.3 . The most signifi cant changes are a decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC) by 10–25 % in the third trimester and can exceed the upper limit in obese women. That in combination with an increase in oxygen consumption results in overall decreased oxygen reserve toward the end of pregnancy. The forced expiratory vol­ume in the fi rst second (FEV1), ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity, and peak fl ows remain unchanged during pregnancy [ 23 ]. The Bohr curve in pregnancy is shifted to the right, lowers the affi nity of hemoglobin for oxygen, and results in increased oxygen delivery to the placenta and maternal tissues.
Table 36.3 Lung volumes in pregnancy
Measurement Changes during
pregnancy
Respiratory rate
Unchanged Unchanged Increased
Vital capacity
Inspiratory capacity
5–10 %
Tidal volume
Increases 30–40 %
Inspiratory reserve volume
Unchanged Decreased
Functional residual capacity
20 %
Expiratory reserve volume
Decreased 15–20 %
Residual volume
Decreased 25 %
Total lung capacity
Decreased 5 %
36 Intensive Care in Obstetrics
423
There is also a progesterone-mediated increase in respiratory drive at the level of the medulla and a resultant increase in tidal volume (VT) and minute ventilation. With this, pregnancy is a state of chronic respiratory alkalosis with compensatory metabolic acidosis. Hyperventilation and decreased PCO 2 are directly related to increased VT not respiratory rate (RR). The normal PCO
during pregnancy is
2
between 27 and 32 mmHg. If a pregnant woman later in ges­tation is found to have a PCO 2 consistent with non-gravid patients, this is considered abnormal and represents CO 2 retention which should be further investigated. The bicar­bonate level is normally 18–21 mEq/l to compensate for the decrease in PCO 2 and does not represent a primary metabolic acidosis. As a result of this partial compensation, the normal pH during pregnancy is 7.4–7.45. The increase in MV and lower PCO 2 are essential to maintain a maternal-fetal CO 2 gradient to allow for fetal CO
The fetal PCO
is approximately 10 mmHg higher than
2
off-loading.
2
maternal when uteroplacental perfusion is normal. It is important to understand that the fetus develops in a CO 2 -rich environment and needs the lower maternal CO 2 tension and the resultant transplacental gradient enabling fetal CO 2 to be readily diffused across the placenta into the maternal venous circulation for gas exchange enabling fetal CO 2 to be readily diffused across the placenta into the maternal venous circula­tion for gas exchange out of the maternal-fetal unit via the maternal lungs. Pathologic pulmonary conditions that increase maternal CO 2 levels will alter the transplacental gra­dient, allowing for fetal CO 2 retention as well. The fetal pH is normally 0.1 units lower than maternal pH which is also important when reviewing mechanical ventilation and maternal- fetal acid-base interactions.
During a normal labor, especially in the second stage (full cervical dilation and pushing), the mother tends to moder­ately hyperventilate in the process, and this drives her CO 2 levels down which increases the maternal-fetal CO 2 gradient in favor of fetal CO 2 off-loading. That being said, excessive ventilation can be deleterious. Forced maternal hyperventila­tion can contribute to fetal acidosis. This has been demon­strated in animal models by Motoyama et al. in 1965: when the maternal PCO 2 falls to 15–20 mmHg or she becomes very alkalotic with pH approaching 7.6, uteroplacental vascular spasm occurs, decreasing circulation and increasing fetal aci­dosis as oxygen delivery to the fetus is compromised, and fetal CO 2 is not circulated as well across the placenta [ 25 ]. When the fetus is unable to off-load its CO 2 , in the setting of inadequate oxygenation, this compromises fetal aerobic (oxi­dative) metabolism of carbohydrate as an energy source and converts to the anaerobic pathway where higher levels of lac­tate are produced above the fetal baseline, and the accumula­tion of lactic acid leads to metabolic acidosis. In this way, which is a difference from adults is the fetus can transition seamlessly from a respiratory to metabolic acidosis.
All of the above must be kept in mind when the question of parameters for mechanical ventilation arises as permissive hypercapnia with low-tidal volume ventilation has not been well studied in obstetric patients. Mechanical ventilation is almost the same in pregnant and nonpregnant patients with some exceptions. In pregnancy, PaCO
should be adjusted
2
between 30 and 32 mmHg, maintaining the normal respira­tory alkalosis and transplacental gradient. The risk of fetal acidosis increases as the PCO
approaches 60 mmHg due to
2
uteroplacental vascular spasm, much in the same way as it occurs with excessive maternal hyperventilation [ 26 ]. It is important that anyone caring for a pregnant patient who requires mechanical ventilation understands that extremes of ventilation are avoided for the benefi t of the mother and fetus.

Hematologic

In pregnancy, physiologic dilutional anemia is normal. There is an important increase in the red blood cell mass (around 20 %) but a higher increase in plasma volume. Women gain an additional 40–50 % of their pre-gravid blood volume, or approximately 1,300 cc of plasma in a singleton pregnancy [ 27 , 28 ]. Regarding the white blood cell (WBC) count, there is a rise during each trimester. During the fi rst trimester, the upper limit is 9,900/mm 2 , 12,200/mm 2 during the second and third trimesters, and as high as 30,000/mm 2 during labor and immediately postpartum [ 29 ]. The WBC changes make the diagnosis of SIRS or sepsis more diffi cult.
The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) shows correlation with admission to ICU for sepsis, positive blood cultures, and fetal tachycardia. The cutoff used for sepsis prediction is 6, with a sensitivity of 88.9 % and a specifi city of 99.2 % [ 30 , 31 ]. See Table 36.4 for parameters and Table 36.5 for scoring.
In pregnancy and the postpartum period, there is a pro­thrombotic state, which increases the risk of thromboem­bolic events around sixfold compared to baseline. This is secondary to an increase of factors I, VII, VIII, IX, and X. There is also a decrease of protein S (more than C) start­ing early in pregnancy [ 30 , 32 , 33 ].

Renal

There are a number of important physical and functional changes of the gravid genitourinary system to keep in con­text when managing sick pregnant or peripartum patients. Because of increased plasma volume and fl ow, the kidneys increase approximately 1 cm in length. The collection sys­tem dilates (calyces, pelvis, and ureters), typically greater on the right due to a slight dextrorotation of the uterus, and, as a
424
Table 36.4 Sepsis in obstetrics score (SOS) parameters [ 30 ]
Variable Score 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 Temperature >40.9 39–40.9 38.5–38.9 36–38.4 34–35.9 32–33.9 30–31.9 <30 Systolic BP >90 70–90 <70 Heart rate >179 150–179 130–149 120–129 ≤119 Respiratory rate >49 35–49 25–34 12–24.0 10–11.0 6–9.0 ≤5
% 92 % 90–91 % <85 %
Sat O
2
WBC >39.9 25–39.9 17–24.9 5.7–16.9 3–5.6 1–2.9 <1 Immature neutrophils
% Lactic acid 4 <4
High abnormal range Normal
≥10 % <10 %
Low abnormal range
C. Oxford and M. La Rosa
Table 36.5 Sepsis in obstetrics score (SOS) scoring [ 30 ]
Scoring system Sensitivity Specifi city PPV NPV
SOS 88.90 % 99.20 % 16.70 % 99.70 % REMS 77.80 % 93.30 % 11.10 % 99.70 % MEOWS 100 % 77.60 % 4.60 % 100 %
result, imaging studies in the late second and third trimesters will typically note mild-to-moderate hydronephrosis. This fi nding can persist up to 4 months postpartum. Severe hydro­nephrosis is not a physiologic fi nding. Increased urinary sta­sis from progesterone relaxation of detrusor smooth muscle and pelvic compression by the expanding uterus contribute to a higher risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) in pregnant patients. Symptomatic UTIs and asymptomatic bacteriuria should be treated in pregnancy. Development of pyelone­phritis risks preterm birth, maternal sepsis, and ARDS.
Functionally, there is an increase in the renal plasma fl ow during pregnancy, which normalizes 12 weeks after the deliv­ery. The creatinine clearance starts to increase as early as 6 weeks of gestation. There is a reduced upper limit of normal maternal serum creatinine at 0.8 mg/dL due to the increase in glomerular fi ltration rate (GFR). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels also decrease in pregnant women [ 3436 ]. Although pregnant mothers often report increased urinary frequency, the actual daily urine volume is not signifi cantly altered from non­pregnant patients [ 37 ]. Urinary protein excretion at the 95th percentile is approximately 260 mg over 24 h and adds valid­ity to the presence of >300 mg of urinary protein a day (which corresponds well to a urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of >0.3), as a criteria establishing the diagnosis of preeclampsia [ 37 ]. In women with preexisting proteinuria, protein levels in urine increase even in the absence of preeclampsia. Magnesium sulfate, the drug of choice to reduce the risk of eclamptic sei­zure in women with preeclampsia, is almost completely renally excreted, and the dose or rate administered must be decreased in gravidas with evidence of renal insuffi ciency (i.e., creatinine >1.3 mg/dL in pregnancy).
The water retention that occurs in pregnancy is hormon­ally mediated. Increased estrogen drives renin production
early in pregnancy which increases angiotensinogen conversion to angiotensins I and II leading to increased aldosterone levels. Despite the increase fi ltered sodium load (due to the increase in GFR), increased aldosterone and deoxycorticosterone in pregnancy create a larger increase in tubular reabsorption of the fi ltered sodium resulting in a net retention of ~1 g Na daily. The latter contributes to the gesta­tional hypervolemia of pregnancy. Because greater water is retained with sodium, there is an overall decrease in serum sodium concentration in pregnancy down to an average of 136 mmol/l and slightly decreased plasma osmolality from 290 down to 280 mosmol/l.
Glycosuria is common in pregnancy, because there is a decrease in distal tubular reabsorption of glucose. Spurious increases in glycosuria are intermittent and do not correlate well with blood glucose. Hence, glucose can be present in maternal urine with a normal fi nger stick, and this is physiologic [ 37 ].

Gastrointestinal

There are few changes to the maternal gastrointestinal tract that signifi cantly impact high-acuity care. The notion of pro­longed gastric emptying time associated with increased aspi­ration rates in pregnancy has been challenged. Gallbladder stasis does occur and can result in higher rates of stone for­mation. Otherwise, liver function tests are not signifi cantly different with the exception of elevated alkaline phosphatase from placental production and decreased albumin from plasma dilution (by up to 30 %). Coagulation times and ami­notransferase levels are not affected by normal pregnancy; changes in these values represent pathology.

Pathology in Pregnancy

Cardiac

As previously stated, deaths from maternal cardiac disease are increasing and now account for up to 50 % of all maternal
36 Intensive Care in Obstetrics
Table 36.6 Antihypertensive medications in pregnancy
Drug Dose Route Frequency Side effect Max dose Hydralazine 5–10 mg IV/IM 15 min Nausea, emesis,
hypotension, palpitation
Labetalol 20 mg IV 10 min Nausea, emesis,
hypotension, bronchospasm
Nifedipine 10–20 mg PO 30 min Hypotension, palpitation,
avoid with magnesium sulfate
Nicardipine 5 mg/h PR Titrate every 5 min Peripheral edema,
tachycardia
Nitroprusside 600–1000 mcg PR/PO Titrate every 5 min Hypotension, increased
intracranial pressure, rebound hypertension
20 mg IV/30 mg IM
300 mg
50 mg
10 mg/h
4 mcg/kg/min
425
deaths in the ICU. Currently, only approximately 4 % of pregnancies are complicated by cardiac disease, but this number is on the rise as the maternal population becomes older and affected by other comorbidities associated with cardiac risks. The strongest predictors of maternal complica­tions as outlined by the CARPREG study, prospectively designed to evaluate pregnancy outcomes in 617 pregnancies complicated by maternal cardiac disease, are:
• A history of heart failure, transient ischemic attack, cere­brovascular accident (CVA), or arrhythmia
• Prepregnancy New York Heart Association functional status >class II
• Left heart obstruction (mitral valve area <2 cm 2 , aortic valve area <1.5 cm 2 , or peak left outfl ow gradient >30 mmHg)
• Ejection fraction <40 %
In this population, the most commonly encountered com-
plications were pulmonary edema and arrhythmias [ 38 ]. Women with known cardiac disease are also known to be at risk for heart failure with intolerance of gestational hyper­volemia. Patients with known pulmonary hypertension or a history of peripartum cardiomyopathy without systolic recovery are advised against pregnancy as maternal death is prohibitively high in these women. If necessary, supportive medications can and should be used in pregnancy. Milrinone is a safe inotrope to use in gravid patients. Sildenafi l or tadalafi l can also be used in women with symptomatic pul­monary hypertension. ACE inhibitors are contraindicated in pregnancy but enalapril has been regarded as safe for breast­feeding by the American Academy of Pediatrics in mothers who delivered term infants.

Preeclampsia-Eclampsia

Preeclampsia is a condition that occurs only in pregnancy. It is defi ned as elevated blood pressure (SBP > 140 or DBP > 90)
and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation. When preeclamp­tic patients are admitted to the ICU, it is typically for severe cases with associated refractory hypertension, neurologic dysfunction (eclamptic seizure, stroke), renal failure, liver failure, pulmonary edema, HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets), and disseminated intravascular coagulation [
39 ]. Women with preeclampsia
have a loss of intravascular oncotic pressure. As a result, they have a total body water overload but with intravascular deple­tion and tend to have hyperdynamic cardiac function. These women may have altered renin and aldosterone activity in pregnancy and may not expand their total blood volume as robustly as women without preeclampsia. This altered vol­ume state limits the ability of these women to tolerate hemor­rhage. Because of low oncotic pressure, leaky capillaries, and higher hydrostatic pressure, these patients are also predis­posed to non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema [ 40 , 41 ].
The fi rst goal in management of preeclampsia with severe features is to stabilize the mother. Severely elevated blood pressure in pregnancy (SBP >160 mmHg or/and DBP >110 mmHg) is associated with stroke and other obstetric complications such as placental abruption. It is recom­mended that severe range blood pressure is treated within 15 min of noting the elevation using intravenous antihyper­tensive agents (Table 36.6 ). Treatment goals and urgency are also informed by the patient’s baseline state. If the patient had systolic BPs in the 180s mmHg range consistently prior to pregnancy, an SBP of 160s mmHg is relatively normal for her, and dropping her BP rapidly to a normotensive range can risk decreasing placental perfusion as it is directly cor­related with maternal MAP.
Another key point in the management of preeclampsia with severe features is the prevention of eclamptic seizures. The Magpie trial showed a signifi cant decrease of seizures in this population when given magnesium sulfate (therapeutic range of 4.8–8.4 mg/dL). Again, caution should be used in patients with impaired renal function, although there is little risk with commonly prescribed repletion doses for hypomagnesemia. The signs and symptoms of magnesium
426
Table 36.7 Pharmacologic agents used for uterine atony
Agent Dose Route Frequency Side effect Contraindication Oxytocin (Pitocin) 10–80 units IV/IM Continuous Nausea, emesis, water
intoxication
Methylergonovine (Methergine)
15-methyl prostaglandin F2 (Hemabate)
Prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone)
Misoprostol 600–1,000 mcg PR/PO One dose Tachycardia, fever None
0.2 mg IM/IU 2–4 h Nausea, emesis, hypertension
0.25 mg IM/IU 15–90 min Nausea, emesis, diarrhea, fl ushing
20 mg PR 2 h Nausea, emesis,
diarrhea, fever
C. Oxford and M. La Rosa
None
Hypertension, preeclampsia
Asthma
Hypotension
toxicity are dose dependent with loss of deep tendon refl exes at serum levels of 8.5–12 mg/dL, respiratory paralysis at 12–16 mg/dL, abnormal cardiac conduction >18 mg/dL, and cardiac arrest when levels are >30 mg/dL. The half-life of magnesium sulfate is 4 h in women with normal renal func­tion. Treatment for magnesium toxicity consists of discon­tinuing the infusion, supportive measures, and administering on one-gram intravenous of calcium gluconate every 5–10 min as necessary [ 4248 ]. Calcium chloride is appro- priate to use for patients with impaired hepatic function as calcium gluconate requires hepatic degluconation for bio­logic activity, whereas calcium chloride provides immedi­ately available calcium.
Pulmonary edema occurs in 2–3 % of patients with pre­eclampsia and, as stated above, can be non-cardiogenic. Treatment includes supportive measures, diuresis, and after­load reduction. Pulmonary edema is considered a sign of end-organ damage and is an indication for delivery. Patients with preeclampsia can have oliguric acute kidney injury, and some reported improved outcomes with the use of a PAC to guide fl uid management in preeclamptic patients who have oliguric acute kidney injury unresponsive to volume resusci­tation [ 39 ].

Hemorrhage

Causes of hemorrhage in pregnancy are abruption, placenta previa or accreta, uterine rupture, uterine inversion, and postpartum hemorrhage. Postpartum hemorrhage is defi ned as more than 500 ml after a vaginal delivery or more than 1,000 ml after a cesarean section. Hemorrhage is still the leading cause of maternal death worldwide. In the United States, there has been a signifi cant decrease in the rates of maternal death associated with hemorrhage [ 43 , 44 ].
As described above, there is an expansion of blood vol­ume in pregnancy. Because of this, the hypovolemia clinical signs are almost always delayed. Signs such as tachycardia and mild hypotension are seen after losing 1,200–1,500 ml of blood (20–25 % of total volume) [ 4346 ]. Management of hemorrhage is centered around control of the bleeding source
and volume support. Massive obstetric hemorrhage is man­aged with blood products based on requirements, and most hospitals with obstetric services now have hemorrhage pro­tocols to address the rapid bleeding that can occur. Recall that the uterus consumes 20 % of the cardiac output at term and can translate to a 500–700 cc per minute blood loss in obstetric hemorrhage. When hemorrhage is massive and has not responded to 2 l of crystalloids, the repletion should be performed in a ratio of 1:1:1 of packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets [ 47 ]. There are medical and surgical approaches to stop the bleeding. The medica­tions used in the peripartum are oxytocin, misoprostol, 15-methyl prostaglandin, and methylergonovine [ 4648 ]. The doses and contraindications are described in Table 36.7 .
If bleeding has not improved with uterotonic medications, uterine tamponade devices such as the Bakri balloon ®, Foley balloons, or packing often stop bleeding. Intraoperatively, one can place O’Leary stitches to ligate the uterine arteries for bleeding control and/or use a B-Lynch suture to externally tamponade the uterus or perform hypogastric artery ligation with care to avoid the ureters. If the patient is bleeding consis­tently but slowly and is stable enough to transfer to an inter­ventional radiology suite, then bilateral uterine artery embolization would be a recommended option. The rate of success is more than 90 %. One advantage of angioemboliza­tion is the potential to use absorbable gelatin sponge (Gelfoam). This product reabsorbs after 2 weeks, making future fertility more likely [ 44 , 48 ]. When medical manage- ment and other surgical or alternative measures fail, hysterec­tomy may need to be performed [ 49 , 50 ].

Amniotic Fluid Embolism

Amniotic fl uid embolism or anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy is a rare but catastrophic event. The incidence is around 1 in every 40,000 deliveries, and the mortality is as high as 60 %. The pathophysiology, although not completely understood, appears to be secondary to a cascade of abnor­mal activation of pro-infl ammatory mediator systems similar to that of the systemic infl ammatory response syndrome, in
36 Intensive Care in Obstetrics
427
association of fetal antigens in maternal circulation during the delivery process or within 30 min after. The signs and symptoms associated with this are hypotension, dyspnea, cyanosis, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest (typically PEA arrest), and seizure-like activity. There are no specifi c treatments or cure for this entity, and management is supportive. There are case reports of the use of tranexamic acid in the management of AFE but more evidence is needed before standards aside from supportive measures can be endorsed. With an appro­priate level of care, the mortality in the United States has decreased from 60 % to almost 20 % for the cases [
51 ].

Trauma Management

Care of the maternal trauma case is interdisciplinary and requires high-level communication and coordination of all service lines responding to the emergency. The ideal team would have the involvement of emergency department fac­ulty, obstetric or maternal-fetal medicine, neonatology, obstetric anesthesia, trauma surgery, and the respective nurs­ing support. Understanding the nuances of evaluating these patients is highly important to maintaining situational aware­ness and a good outcome. The primary and secondary surveys should be performed keeping the following caveats in mind:

Primary Survey

• Airway: gravid patients can be expected to have oropha­ryngeal edema, making securing an airway potentially diffi cult, and consideration of early intubation in these patients with an ETT that is 1 mm smaller in internal diameter is advised. A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) can be used safely to provide a means to ventilate a patient who is unable to be intubated; however it is not consid­ered a protected airway.
• Breathing: In the late second to early third trimester, the uterus displaces the diaphragm upward. If the patient has a suspected pneumothorax and is visibly pregnant, the chest tube should be placed higher than in nonpregnant patients in the third or fourth intercostal space.
• Circulation: leftward uterine displacement with a one- or two-handed technique is paramount to maintain or aug­ment maternal cardiac output. Avoid lower-extremity lines in the gravida who is visibly pregnant as iliac com­pression could compromise circulation of resuscitative medications. Two large-bore IVs should be placed, and she should be typed and cross-matched for blood products early in preparation for any bleeding injuries; placental abruptions do not always present classically and bleeding can be concealed. Signs of hemorrhagic shock present
late in pregnant patients, and one should be prepared to replace blood volume with products. Vasopressors should be used for those in shock getting volume resuscitation at the doses for nonpregnant patients. If cardioversion or defi brillation is required, the voltages used are not differ­ent in pregnancy and will not harm the fetus.
• Disability: always consider the postictal state from eclampsia as a cause for altered mental status or decreased alertness.
• Exposure: always assess for entry and exit wounds, if trauma is due to a fi rearm and an exit wound is not pres­ent, the bullet could be lodged in the fetus inside the uterus.

Secondary Survey

It is implicit that the mother is stabilized fi rst before evalua­tion of the fetus occurs in maternal trauma. The fetus is part of the secondary survey. Once the primary survey is complete with said considerations in mind, then a second comprehensive physical exam is performed where the fetal heart tones can be checked by Doppler or ultrasound. If the mother is stable and the pregnancy is viable (23 weeks in some institutions), then fetal monitoring may be indicated and should be guided by the obstetric service. Ultrasound is also performed once the mother is stable to establish placental location, amniotic fl uid volume, fetal viability, presentation, gestational age, and estimated fetal weight. A bedside- expanded maternal focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) ultrasound can be reliably performed to quickly assess for evidence of hemoperitoneum, pericardial effusion, and pneumo- or hemothorax. Lab testing and other imaging (i.e., CT or X-rays for orthopedic injuries) occur in the secondary survey. In hospitals with quick turnover, a high Kleihauer­Betke result for fetal cells (with HbF) in the maternal circu­lation is of concern for maternal-fetal hemorrhage, and the obstetric team should be alerted as the result could inform delivery timing. Fetal monitoring in the viable pregnancy may show late decelerations (occur following a contraction) and can indicate a placental abruption has occurred or is in process. The obstetric team should be involved as early as possible in these cases to guide maternal care management and decisions on fetal expectant management versus deliv­ery. The obstetric team will help guide counseling on possi­ble pregnancy termination in previable cases [ 52 ].

Perimortem Cesarean Section

A perimortem cesarean section is indicated for maternal car­diac arrest and unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The cesarean section should be started at 4 min of cardiac
428
C. Oxford and M. La Rosa
arrest with the goal to deliver the fetus delivered by 5 min after maternal arrest for optimal fetal outcomes [
53 ]. If the
pregnancy is beyond 25 weeks gestation, there is a 45 % fetal and 72 % chance of maternal outcomes historically [
5456 ].
The uterine evacuation can also improve the venous return. The technique to use is a Pfannenstiel incision with a low-transverse uterine incision if the lower uterine segment is well developed or a classical-vertical uterine incision for preterm or malpresentation [
44 , 49 ].

Summary

Care of the gravid or recently postpartum patient can be chal­lenging if one does not know what to expect in this popula­tion. With a better understanding of the common high-acuity events in pregnancy and the impact of their physiologic alter­ations, the reader will be better equipped to manage these patients collaboratively with the obstetric service for the best outcomes.

References

1. Zwart JJ, Dupuis JR, Richters A, et al. Obstetric intensive care unit
admission: a 2-year nationwide population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:256.
2. Pollock W, Rose L, Dennis CL. Pregnant and postpartum admis-
sions to the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1465.
3. Zeeman G. Obstetric critical care: a blueprint for improved out-
comes. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(9 suppl):S208.
4. Hoyert DL. Maternal mortality and related concepts. National
Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2007;3(33):4.
5. Creanga, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States.
Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:5.
6. Callaghan WM. Overview of maternal mortality in the United
States. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:2.
7. Souza JP, et al. The WHO maternal near-miss approach and the
Maternal Severity Index Model (MSI): tools for assessing the man­agement of severe maternal morbidity. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44129.
10.1371/journal.pone.0044129 .
doi:
8. Crobman, et al. Frequency of and factors associated with severe
maternal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):804–10.
9. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, et al. Mortality Probability Models
(MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA. 1993;270:2478–86.
10. Carle, et al. Design and internal validation of an obstetric early
warning score. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:354–67.
11. Clapp J, Capeless E. Cardiovascular function before, during and
after the fi rst and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80:1469.
12. Clark S, Cotton D, Lee W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment
of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1439.
13. Granger J. Maternal and fetal adaptations during pregnancy and
integrative physiology. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002;283:R1289.
14. Bhagwat A, Engel P. Heart disease and pregnancy. Cardiol Clin.
1995;13:163.
15. Thornburg KL, Jacobson SL, Giraud GD, Morton MJ. Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2000;24(1):11–4.
16. Goodwin AP, Pearce AJ. The human wedge: a manoeuvre to relieve aortocaval compression during resuscitation in late pregnancy. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:433.
17. Jones SJ, Kinsella SM, Donald FA. Comparison of measured and estimated angles of table tilt at Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:86–7.
18. Kundra P, Khanna S, Habeebullah S, Ravishankar M. Manual dis­placement of the uterus during Caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:460–5.
19. Robson S, Dunlop W, Boys R, et al. Cardiac output during labour. BMJ. 1987;295:1169.
20. Kerr M. Cardiovascular dynamics in pregnancy and labour. Br Med Bull. 1968;24:19.
21. Polanczyk C, Rohde L, Goldman L, Cook E, Thomas E, Marcantonio E, et al. Right heart catheterization and cardiac com­plications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: an observa­tional study. JAMA. 2001;286:309–14.
22. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics and gynecology. ACOG Technical Bulletin Number 175–December 1992. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993; 42:199–205.
23. Crapo R. Normal cardiopulmonary physiology during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;39:3.
24. Schatz M, Zieger R. Diagnosis and management of rhinitis during pregnancy. Allergy Proc. 1988;9:545.
25. Motoyama E, Rivard G, Acheson F, Cook C. Adverse effect of maternal hyperventilation on the fetus. Lancet. 1966;1:286–8.
26. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investiga­tion of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990; 263:2753.
27. Pritchard J. Changes in blood volume during pregnancy and deliv­ery. Anesthesiology. 1965;26:393.
28. Lo F, Kaufman S. Effect of 5α-pregnan-3α-ol-20-one on nitric oxide biosynthesis and plasma volume in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comput Physiol. 2000.
29. Pitkin R, Witte D. Platelet and leukocyte counts in pregnancy. JAMA. 1979;242:2696.
30. Barton JR, Sibai BM. Severe sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:689.
31. Albright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, et al. The sepsis in obstetrics score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:39.
32. Lockitch G. Clinical biochemistry of pregnancy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1997;34:67.
33. Present P, Comstock GW. Tuberculin sensitivity in pregnancy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975;112:413.
34. Lindheimer M, Davison J, Katz A. The kidney and hypertension in pregnancy: twenty exciting years. Semin Nephrol. 2001;21:173.
35. Dunlop W. Serial changes in renal haemodynamics during normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:1.
36. Ezimokhai M, Davison J, Philips P, et al. Non-postural serial changes in renal function during the third trimester of normal human pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:465.
37. Yeomans E, Gilstrap L. Physiologic changes in pregnancy and their impact on critical care. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(10 Suppl):S256–8.
38. Sorensen and on behalf of the Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (CARPREG) Investigators, Gordon P, Spears JC, Tam JW, Amankwah KS, Smallhorn JF, Farine D, Morton S, Kells CM, Bergin ML, Kiess MC, Marcotte F, Taylor DA, Siu ESC, Sermer M, Colman JM, Alvarez AN, Mercier L-A, Brian C. Prospective mul­ticenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation. 2001;104:515–21.
36 Intensive Care in Obstetrics
429
39. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122–31.
40. LaMarca BD, Gilbert J, Ganger JP. Recent progress toward the understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertension during pre­eclampsia. Hypertension. 2008.
41. Zhou CC, Zhang Y, Irani RA. Angiotensin receptor agonistic auto­antibodies induce pre-eclampsia in pregnant mice. Nat Med. 2008;14:855–62.
42. LaMarca BD, Ryan MJ, Gilbert JS, Murphy SR, Granger JP. Infl ammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007;9(6):480–5.
43. Pritchard JA, Baldwin RM, Dickey JC, et al. Blood volume changes in pregnancy and the puerperium. II. Red blood cell loss and changes in apparent blood volume during and following vaginal delivery, cesarean section, and cesarean section plus total hysterec­tomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962;84:1271.
44. Dildy GA. Postpartum hemorrhage: new management options. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45:330.
45. Elbourne DR, Prendiville WJ, Carroli G, et al. Prophylactic use of oxytocin in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2001.
46. Prata N, Gerdts C. Measurement of postpartum blood loss. BMJ. 2010;340:c555.
47. Novello A, King JC. Health advisory: prevention of maternal deaths through improved management of hemorrhage.
www.acog.org/
acog_districts/dist_notice.cfm?recno=1&bulletin=1517
2 May 2006.
48. Bakri YN, Amri A, Abdul Jabber F. Tamponade-balloon for obstet­rical bleeding. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;74:139.
49. B-Lynch C, Coker A, Lawal AH, et al. The B-Lynch surgical tech­nique for control of massive postpartum haemorrhage: an alterna­tive to hysterectomy? Five cases reported. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:275.
50. Cho JH, Jun HS, Lee CN. Hemostatic suturing technique for uter­ine bleeding during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96:129.
51. Clark SL. Amniotic fl uid embolism. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:322.
52. Oxford C, Ludmir J. Trauma in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(4):611–29.
53. Mäkikallio K, McElhinney DB, Levine JC, et al. Fetal aortic valve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: patient selection for fetal intervention. Circulation. 2006;113(11): 1401–5.
54. Mattox KL, Goetzl L. Trauma in pregnancy. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33:385–9.
55. Dijkman A, Huisman CM, Smit M, et al. Cardiac arrest in preg­nancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emer­gency skills training? BJOG. 2010;117:282.
56. Vanden Hoek TL, Morrison LJ, Shuster M, et al. Part 12: cardiac arrest in special situations: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122:S829.
. Accessed