Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_33_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
and word final stops. Sporadic, infrequent nasal fricatives occurred in the speech sample but the overriding error place and type was pharyngeal fricative. His mild (and intermient) hypernasality, the absence of audible nasal air emission, and ability to produce all of the stop consonants and (nonsibilant) fricatives with normal placement and perceptibly good oral pressure suggest adequate VP closure. EC was not cooperative for videonasendoscopy assessment. Speech therapy is recommended with the initial goal of teaching and stabilizing a normal /s/ articulation and eliminating his pharyngeal fricative substitution. In addition, the finding that he inconsistently replaces any of the oral stops with gloal stops but also uses the stops correctly suggests the need for a combined articulation/phonetic and phonological therapy approach. EC was not stimulable for any of the fricatives and affricates missing from his speech sound inventory but he was stimulable for “long /t/” so this would be a good starting point for teaching /s/. It is anticipated that as oral productions replace his pharyngeal and gloal placements, more consistent velopharyngeal closure will be facilitated and resonance will be normalized.
• Option #2: Summarize using a more objective form such as the Reporting Form for Cleft Palate Speech
362
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
Assessment presented in Appendix 8G (see
Appendix 8G for EC in Downloadable Forms).
Downloadable Forms for EC's speech assessment (see the Evolve
website).
Conversational Speech: Partial transcripts of compensatory articulations and other errors in EC's conversational speech (two video excerpts, not the whole sample): EC's Conv Speech Transcript VIDEO 1 and EC's Conv Speech Transcript VIDEO 2—2 pages.
— Included to provide a representative sampling.
— Also provides additional practice in listening for
pharyngeal fricatives and gloal stops .
P-M-V Matrix for EC, based on EC's whole speech sample—1 page.
AESS Transcription and Score for EC—1 page.
— For sentence #9, the correct score for initial /t/ is
based on EC's first production before things got silly.
— For sentence #14, pharyngeal fricative replacement
for /ʃ/ is hard to hear and difficult to judge; it almost sounds /s/ - like, but given that every other /ʃ/ produced by EC in the entire sample is replaced by
363
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
pharyngeal fricative, it is unlikely that this one production was an /s/.
GFTA–2 Summary of results for EC.
Appendix 8G Reporting Form for EC—4 pages.
364
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
References
Bankson NW, Bernthal JE. Bankson-Bernthal test of phonology. Pro-
Ed: Austin, Tex; 1990.
Baylis A, Chapman K, Cordero K, et al. Americleft Speech Outcomes
Project. American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA). [website] hp://www.acpa-
cpf.org/research/the_americleft_outcomes_project/ [(Go to
download Americleft Study Guide); Accessed February 25, 2016].
Baylis AL, Whitehill TL, Chapman KL, Americleft Speech Group.
Validity and reliability of visual analog scaling for assessment of speech outcomes in children with repaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015;52:660–670.
Bernthal JE, Bankson NW, Flipsen P. Articulation and phonological
disorders: speech sound disorders in children. Allyn & Bacon: Boston; 2013.
Chapman K, Baylis A, Trost-Cardamone J, et al. The Americleft
Speech Project: A training and reliability study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53:93–108.
Cleves M, Arboledo C, Bermudez B, et al. Reliability of the
perceptual evaluation of mp3 speech samples. [Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, Scosdale, Ariz, April 20-25] 2009.
Fletcher SG. Contingencies for bioelectric modification of nasality.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1972;37:329–346.
Goldman R, Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation 3 (GFTA-
3). [(ed 3). San Antonio, Tex: Pearson Clinical Assessment] 2015.
Grunwell P. Analyzing cleft palate speech. Whurr Publishers:
London; 1993.
Henningsson GE, Isberg AM. Velopharyngeal movement paerns
in patients alternating between oral and gloal articulation: a clinical and cineradiographical study. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23:1–9.
Henningsson GE, Isberg AM. A cineradiographic study of
velopharyngeal movements for deviant versus non deviant articulation. Cleft Palate J. 1991;28:115–117.
365
https://t.me/medicina_free
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Henningsson GE, Kuehn DP, Sell D, et al. Universal parameters
for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45:1–15.
Huers B, Henningsson G. Speech outcome following treatment
in cross-linguistic cleft palate studies: Methodological implications. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004;41:544–549.
John A, Sell D, Harding-Bell A, et al. CAPS-A: a validated and
reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43:272–288.
Kahn L, Lewis NP. Kahn-Lewis phonological analysis 3 (KLPA-3).
[(3rd ed). San Antonio, Tex: Pearson Clinical Assessment] 2015.
Lohmander A, Willadsen E, Persson C, et al. Methodology for
speech assessment in the Scandcleft project—An international randomized clinical trial on palatal surgery: Experiences from a pilot study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46:347–362.
Peterson-Falzone SJ, Hardin-Jones MA, Karnell MP. Cleft palate
speech. 3rd ed. Mosby: St. Louis; 2001.
Peterson-Falzone SJ, Hardin-Jones MA, Karnell MP. Cleft palate
speech. 4th ed. Mosby: St. Louis; 2010.
Peterson-Falzone SJ, Trost-Cardamone JE, Karnell MP, Hardin-
Jones MA. The clinician's guide to treating cleft palate speech. Mosby: St. Louis; 2006.
Secord W, Donohue JS. Clinical assessment of articulation and
phonology. 2nd ed. Super Duper Publications: Greenville, SC;
2014.
Sell D, Harding A, Grunwell P. GOS.SP.ASS.'98: An assessment
for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). Int J Language Communication Disorders. 1999;34:17–33.
Stoel-Gammon C, Dunn C. Normal and disordered phonology in
children. University Park Press: Baltimore; 1985.
Trost-Cardamone JE. Diagnosis of specific cleft palate speech
error paerns for planning therapy or physical management needs. Bzoch KR. Communicative disorders related to cleft palate speech. 4th ed. Lile, Brown: Boston; 2004:137–173.
Trost-Cardamone JE. Articulation assessment procedures and
treatment decisions. Moller KT, Starr CD. Cleft palate
366
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
interdisciplinary issues and treatment, for clinicians by clinicians. 2nd ed. Pro-Ed: Austin, TX; 2009.
Trost-Cardamone JE. American English Sentence Sample (AESS): a
controlled sample for assessing cleft palate speech outcome. [Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Cleft Palate­Craniofacial Association, San Jose, CA] 2012.
Trost-Cardamone JE. Cleft palate speech: a comprehensive 2-part set.
[American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Professional Development Course (with three DVDs and accompanying course pack); Available through ASHA Bookstore at] www.asha.org; 2013 [Accessed February 25, 2016].
Trost-Cardamone JE, Bernthal JE. Articulation assessment
procedures and treatment decisions. Moller KT, Starr CD. Cleft
palate interdisciplinary issues and treatment: for clinicians by clinicians. Pro-Ed: Austin, TX; 1993.
Trost-Cardamone JE, Kuehn DP. The American English Word
Sample (AEWS). [Unpublished single word assessment
protocol] 2007 [revised 2009].
Whitehill TL, Lee AS, Chun C. Direct magnitude estimation and
interval scaling of hypernasality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:80–88.
Wiel MA. Communicative impairment associated with clefting.
Shprinen RJ, Bardach J. Cleft palate speech management: A multidisciplinary approach. Mosby.: Boston; 1995.
367
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
9
368
https://t.me/medicina_free
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Instrumental Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Function
Every speech disorder causes a range of disability. Velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) is no exception. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) use terms such as “marginal,” “mild,” “mild-moderate,” “borderline,” or “severe” to describe the shades of disordered speech resulting from VPI (Morris, 1984; Van Demark and Morris, 1983).
Instrumentation is frequently used to supplement clinicians' perceptions of speech quality in an effort to describe more accurately those patients who may have some degree of difficulty with velopharyngeal (VP) valving. In this chapter, we examine the role of instrumentation in the clinical process of assessment of individuals who may have VPI.
369
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
What Instrumentation Can Do
For many years, the trained clinician's ear was viewed as the only tool needed to assess the speech of a child with VPI. A strong case can be made for this position today. VPI maers only if it results in speech quality that negatively affects understandability or calls negative aention to itself. No instrument can make such a determination beer than the human ear aached to a discerning, well-educated human brain. Judgments about the accuracy of results from most instrumental approaches are validated by comparing them with perceptual judgments (Dalston et al., 1993; Nellis et al., 1992; Waerson, 1998). Instrumental assessment results are considered questionable or even meaningless if they indicate complete VP closure for speech when at the same time speech is perceived to be hypernasal or otherwise perceptually indicative of incomplete VP closure.
Clinicians who infrequently work with individuals who have VPI are often uncomfortable with their own subjective, perceptual assessments. Some clinicians prefer “objective” backup for their perceptual judgments. Instrumentation helps them beer appreciate the physiology, aerodynamics, and acoustics underlying the percept. Instrumental assessment is used to confirm and help explain the bases for perceived VPI and to influence decisions about speech therapy and physical management.
370
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free
What Instrumentation Cannot Do
SLPs often refer patients for “objective” assessment of what the VP system can and cannot do without realizing that a complicating factor exists. That factor is behavioral. In other words, the individual may have a potentially functional VP system that he or she is simply (and unknowingly) bypassing. For example, as discussed in Chapter 5, if the speaker is habitually using gloal stops for all or nearly all pressure consonants, the VP system will not even try to close. For instrumentation to tell the clinician what is possible, the speaker must first be trying to produce a sound that requires VP closure, oral placement, and orally directed airflow. Speech production probes may help inform the clinician about what is possible for the child with VPI. Some children may find that whispered speech helps them bypass the behavioral barrier to orally directed airflow during obstruent productions. Other children may achieve a similar result by producing “raspberries” or by using the manual nasal occlusion technique. The boom line is that instrumentation cannot tell the clinician much if the speaker is bypassing the system.
Another way to think of this is to recognize that VPI may involve problems with either the instrument (the physical mechanism) or the musician (the individual learning to use the physical mechanism). Children born with cleft palate start off with an imperfect mechanism. Appropriate surgery resolves that problem in most cases, but some children continue to exhibit VPI. Speakers with less than optimal surgical outcomes generally fall into two categories: those for whom the surgery was simply inadequate and those who have trouble learning to use the new mechanism (see Chapter 5). Learning to use a newly adequate VP mechanism may take some time.
371
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
https://t.me/medicina_free