Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3774_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
40
https://t.me/medicina_free
3. Wentzel JJ, Chatzizisis YS, Gijsen FJ, Giannoglou GD, Feldman CL, Stone PH.Endothelial
shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: current understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;96:234–43.
4. Shahawy S, Libby P.Atherosclerosis. In: Lilly, Leonard S, editors. Pathophysiology of heart
disease. Philadelphia: ProQuest eBook Central: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. p.112–33.
5. Psaltis PJ, Simari RD. Vascular wall progenitor cells in health and disease. Circ Res.
2015;116:1392–412.
6. Talman AH, Psaltis PJ, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Seneviratne SK, Wong DT.Epicardial adi-
pose tissue: far more than a fat depot. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014;4:416–29.
7. Stenmark KR, Yeager ME, El Kasmi KC, Nozik-Grayck E, Gerasimovskaya EV, Li M, etal.
The adventitia: essential regulator of vascular wall structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol.
2013;75:23–47.
8. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM.Lessons from sudden coronary
death: a comprehensive morphological classication scheme for atherosclerotic lesions.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1262–75.
9. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Gold HK, Yuan J, Narula J, etal. The thin-cap broatheroma:
a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr
Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:285–92.
10. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors
and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med.
1997;336:1276–82.
11. Sakakura K, Nakano M, Otsuka F, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R.Pathophysiology of
atherosclerosis plaque progression. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:399–411.
12. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y, Smialek JE, Virmani R.Plaque rupture and sudden
death related to exertion in men with coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1999;281:921–6.
13. Kolodgie FD, Narula J, Burke AP, Haider N, Farb A, Hui-Liang Y, et al. Localization of
apoptotic macrophages at the site of plaque rupture in sudden coronary death. Am J Pathol.
2000;157:1259–68.
14. Sukhova GK, Schonbeck U, Rabkin E, Schoen FJ, Poole AR, Billinghurst RC, etal. Evidence
for increased collagenolysis by interstitial collagenases-1 and -3in vulnerable human atheromatous plaques. Circulation. 1999;99:2503–9.
15. Vengrenyuk Y, Carlier S, Xanthos S, Cardoso L, Ganatos P, Virmani R, etal. A hypothesis for
vulnerable plaque rupture due to stress-induced debonding around cellular microcalcications
in thin brous caps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14678–83.
16. Gijsen FJ, Wentzel JJ, Thury A, Mastik F, Schaar JA, Schuurbiers JC, etal. Strain distribu-
tion over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ
Physiol. 2008;295:H1608–14.
17. Otsuka F, Sakakura K, Yahagi K, Joner M, Virmani R.Has our understanding of calcica-
tion in human coronary atherosclerosis progressed? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:
724–36.
18. Badimon L, Vilahur G.Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture. J
Intern Med. 2014;276:618–32.
19. Dhawan SS, Avati Nanjundappa RP, Branch JR, Taylor WR, Quyyumi AA, Jo H, etal. Shear
stress and plaque development. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:545–56.
20. Gimbrone MA Jr, Garcia-Cardena G.Vascular endothelium, hemodynamics, and the pathobi-
ology of atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2013;22:9–15.
21. Shapiro MD, Fazio S. From lipids to inammation: new approaches to reducing atheroscle-
rotic risk. Circ Res. 2016;118:732–49.
22. Hansson GK. Inammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.
2005;352:1685–95.
23. Aluganti Narasimhulu C, Fernandez-Ruiz I, Selvarajan K, Jiang X, Sengupta B, Riad A,
et al. Atherosclerosis—do we know enough already to prevent it? Curr Opin Pharmacol.
2016;27:92–102.
S. Fernando et al.

2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pathophysiology ofAtherosclerosis
24. Woollard KJ, Geissmann F. Monocytes in atherosclerosis: subsets and functions. Nat Rev
Cardiol. 2010;7:77–86.
25. Ley K, Miller YI, Hedrick CC. Monocyte and macrophage dynamics during atherogenesis.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1506–16.
26. Chistiakov DA, Bobryshev YV, Orekhov AN.Macrophage-mediated cholesterol handling in
atherosclerosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20:17–28.
27. Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EA. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat
Rev Immunol. 2013;13:709–21.
28. Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, Theurl I, Iwamoto Y, Figueiredo JL, et al. Local
proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med.
2013;19:1166–72.
29. Galkina E, Kadl A, Sanders J, Varughese D, Sarembock IJ, Ley K. Lymphocyte recruitment
into the aortic wall before and during development of atherosclerosis is partially L-selectin
dependent. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1273–82.
30. Wu MY, Li CJ, Hou MF, Chu PY.New insights into the role of inammation in the patho-
genesis of atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijms18102034.
31. Michael A, Seidman RNM, Stone JR.Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. In: Cellular and
molecular pathobiology of cardiovascular disease. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc; 2014. p.221–37.
32. Weber C, Noels H.Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat Med.
2011;17:1410–22.
33. Hansson GK, Nilsson J. Vaccination against atherosclerosis? Induction of atheroprotective
immunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2009;31:95–101.
34. Hansson GK, Jonasson L. The discovery of cellular immunity in the atherosclerotic plaque.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:1714–7.
35. Dilley RJ, McGeachie JK, Prendergast FJ.A review of the proliferative behaviour, morphol-
ogy and phenotypes of vascular smooth muscle. Atherosclerosis. 1987;63:99–107.
36. Tabas I, Garcia-Cardena G, Owens GK.Recent insights into the cellular biology of atheroscle-
rosis. J Cell Biol. 2015;209:13–22.
37. Alexander MR, Owens GK.Epigenetic control of smooth muscle cell differentiation and phe-
notypic switching in vascular development and disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:13–40.
38. Newby AC.Molecular and cell biology of native coronary and vein-graft atherosclerosis: regu-
lation of plaque stability and vessel-wall remodelling by growth factors and cell- extracellular
matrix interactions. Coron Artery Dis. 1997;8:213–24.
39. van Vlijmen BJ, Gerritsen G, Franken AL, Boesten LS, Kockx MM, Gijbels MJ, et al.
Macrophage p53 deciency leads to enhanced atherosclerosis in APOE∗3-Leiden transgenic
mice. Circ Res. 2001;88:780–6.
40. Liu J, Thewke DP, Su YR, Linton MF, Fazio S, Sinensky MS.Reduced macrophage apoptosis
is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-null mice.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:174–9.
41. Arai S, Shelton JM, Chen M, Bradley MN, Castrillo A, Bookout AL, etal. A role for the
apoptosis inhibitory factor AIM/Spalpha/Api6in atherosclerosis development. Cell Metab.
2005;1:201–13.
42. Tabas I.Macrophage death and defective inammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2010;10:36–46.
43. Clarke MC, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, Littlewood TD, etal. Apoptosis
of vascular smooth muscle cells induces features of plaque vulnerability in atherosclerosis. Nat
Med. 2006;12:1075–80.
44. Moore KJ, Tabas I.Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145:341–55.
45. Clarke MC, Bennett MR.Cause or consequence: what does macrophage apoptosis do in ath-
erosclerosis? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:153–5.
46. Ho CY, Shanahan CM.Medial arterial calcication: an overlooked player in peripheral arterial
disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36:1475–82.
41

42
https://t.me/medicina_free
47. Speer MY, Giachelli CM. Regulation of cardiovascular calcication. Cardiovasc Pathol.
2004;13:63–70.
48. Giachelli CM.Vascular calcication mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:2959–64.
49. Clarke MC, Littlewood TD, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, et al. Chronic
apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells accelerates atherosclerosis and promotes calcication and medial degeneration. Circ Res. 2008;102:1529–38.
50. Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Hegyi L, Bennett MR, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL. Apoptosis
regulates human vascular calcication invitro: evidence for initiation of vascular calcication
by apoptotic bodies. Circ Res. 2000;87:1055–62.
51. Rocha-Singh KJ, Zeller T, Jaff MR.Peripheral arterial calcication: prevalence, mechanism,
detection, and clinical implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:E212–20.
52. Johnson RC, Leopold JA, Loscalzo J.Vascular calcication: pathobiological mechanisms and
clinical implications. Circ Res. 2006;99:1044–59.
53. Fukumoto Y, Libby P, Rabkin E, Hill CC, Enomoto M, Hirouchi Y, etal. Statins alter smooth
muscle cell accumulation and collagen content in established atheroma of watanabe heritable
hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001;103:993–9.
54. Luan Z, Chase AJ, Newby AC. Statins inhibit secretion of metalloproteinases-1,-2,-3,
and-9 from vascular smooth muscle cells and macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.
2003;23(5):769–75.
55. Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J, Nilsson J. Pravastatin treatment
increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inammation, metalloproteinases,
and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation.
2001;103:926–33.
56. Barger AC, Beeuwkes R 3rd, Lainey LL, Silverman KJ.Hypothesis: vasa vasorum and neovas-
cularization of human coronary arteries. A possible role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. N Eng J Med. 1984;310:175–7.
57. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Finn AV, Gold HK, Tulenko TN, etal. Atherosclerotic
plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2054–61.
58. Shah PK, Falk E, Badimon JJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Mailhac A, Villareal-Levy G, etal. Human
monocyte-derived macrophages induce collagen breakdown in brous caps of atherosclerotic
plaques. Potential role of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases and implications for plaque
rupture. Circulation. 1995;92:1565–9.
59. Galis ZS, Khatri JJ.Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the
good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res. 2002;90:251–62.
60. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, etal. A denition of
advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classication of atherosclerosis. A
report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American
Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355–74.
61. Dalager S, Paaske WP, Kristensen IB, Laurberg JM, Falk E.Artery-related differences in ath-
erosclerosis expression: implications for atherogenesis and dynamics in intima-media thickness. Stroke. 2007;38:2698–705.
62. Barua RS, Ambrose JA. Mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in cigarette smoke exposure.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1460–7.
63. Braunwald E. Coronary plaque erosion: recognition and management. JACC Cardiovasc
Imaging. 2013;6(3):288–9.
64. Jia H, Abtahian F, Aguirre AD, Lee S, Chia S, Lowe H, etal. In vivo diagnosis of plaque ero-
sion and calcied nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome by intravascular optical
coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1748–58.
65. Lieschke GJ, Grail D, Hodgson G, Metcalf D, Stanley E, Cheers C, etal. Mice lacking granu-
locyte colony-stimulating factor have chronic neutropenia, granulocyte and macrophage progenitor cell deciency, and impaired neutrophil mobilization. Blood. 1994;84:1737–46.
66. Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A. NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons. Trends
Immunol. 2009;30:513–21.
S. Fernando et al.

2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pathophysiology ofAtherosclerosis
67. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P.Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inammation.
Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:159–75.
68. Dorweiler B, Torzewski M, Dahm M, Kirkpatrick CJ, Lackner KJ, Vahl CF.Subendothelial
inltration of neutrophil granulocytes and liberation of matrix-destabilizing enzymes in an
experimental model of human neo-intima. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99:373–81.
69. Kramer MC, Rittersma SZ, de Winter RJ, Ladich ER, Fowler DR, Liang YH, etal. Relationship
of thrombus healing to underlying plaque morphology in sudden coronary death. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2010;55:122–32.
70. Gupta AK, Joshi MB, Philippova M, Erne P, Hasler P, Hahn S, et al. Activated endothelial
cells induce neutrophil extracellular traps and are susceptible to NETosis-mediated cell death.
FEBS Lett. 2010;584:3193–7.
71. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW, Libby P.Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases
and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin
Invest. 1994;94:2493–503.
72. Binder CJ, Chou MY, Fogelstrand L, Hartvigsen K, Shaw PX, Boullier A, etal. Natural anti-
bodies in murine atherosclerosis. Curr Drug Targets. 2008;9:190–5.
73. Mosca L.C-reactive protein—to screen or not to screen? N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1615–7.
74. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Lepage S, Braunwald E.Elevation of tumor necro-
sis factor-alpha and increased risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 2000;101:2149–53.
75. Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, Smith LC, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, etal. Circulating
adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study.
Circulation. 1997;96:4219–25.
76. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Roitman-Johnson B, Stampfer MJ, Allen J.Plasma concentration
of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and risks of future myocardial infarction in apparently healthy men. Lancet. 1998;351:88–92.
77. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N.Soluble P-selectin and the risk of future cardiovascular events.
Circulation. 2001;103:491–5.
78. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N.Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a compari-
son of C-reactive protein, brinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol
screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001;285:2481–5.
79. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N.C-reactive protein and other markers of inam-
mation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Eng J Med. 2000;342:836–43.
80. Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Tracy RP, Corti MC, Wacholder S, Ettinger WH Jr, etal. Associations
of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly. Am J Med.
1999;106:506–12.
81. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB.Production of C-reactive
protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European concerted action
on thrombosis and disabilities angina pectoris study group. Lancet. 1997;349:462–6.
82. Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ.Familial hypercholesterolemias: prevalence,
genetics, diagnosis and screening recommendations from the National Lipid Association
Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5:S9–17.
83. Bouhairie VE, Goldberg AC.Familial hypercholesterolemia. Cardiol Clin. 2015;33:169–79.
84. Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, etal. Homozygous
familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial
Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2146–57.
85. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS,
etal. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the
European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3478–90a.
86. Dahlen GH, Stenlund H. Lp(a) lipoprotein is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease:
pathogenic mechanisms and clinical signicance. Clin Genet. 1997;52:272–80.
43

44
https://t.me/medicina_free
87. Do R, Stitziel NO, Won HH, Jorgensen AB, Duga S, Angelica Merlini P, et al. Exome
sequencing identies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature. 2015;518:102–6.
88. McCully KS. Homocysteine and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Expert Rev Clin
Pharmacol. 2015;8:211–9.
89. Vacek TP, Rehman S, Neamtu D, Yu S, Givimani S, Tyagi SC.Matrix metalloproteinases in
atherosclerosis: role of nitric oxide, hydrogen sulde, homocysteine, and polymorphisms.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:173–83.
90. Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, Sengupta S, Peloso GM, Gustafsson S, Kanoni S, etal. Discovery
and renement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1274–83.
91. Chaturvedi N.Ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2003;89:681–6.
92. Tillin T, Hughes AD, Whincup P, Mayet J, Sattar N, McKeigue PM, et al. Ethnicity and
prediction of cardiovascular disease: performance of QRISK2 and Framingham scores in a
U.K. tri-ethnic prospective cohort study (SABRE—Southall And Brent REvisited). Heart.
2014;100:60–7.
93. Qiu J, Zheng Y, Hu J, Liao D, Gregersen H, Deng X, etal. Biomechanical regulation of vas-
cular smooth muscle cell functions: from invitro to invivo understanding. J R Soc Interface.
2014;11:20130852.
94. Tsao CW, Vasan RS.Cohort prole: the Framingham Heart Study (FHS): overview of mile-
stones in cardiovascular epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1800–13.
95. Amizuka N, Hasegawa T, Oda K, Luiz de Freitas PH, Hoshi K, Li M, etal. Histology of
epiphyseal cartilage calcication and endochondral ossication. Front Biosci (Elite Ed).
2012;4:2085–100.
96. Holman RL, Mc GH Jr, Strong JP, Geer JC. The natural history of atherosclerosis: the
early aortic lesions as seen in New Orleans in the middle of the 20th century. Am J Pathol.
1958;34:209–35.
97. Bobryshev YV, Ivanova EA, Chistiakov DA, Nikiforov NG, Orekhov AN.Macrophages and
their role in atherosclerosis: pathophysiology and transcriptome analysis. Biomed Res Int.
2016;2016:9582430.
98. Gleissner CA. Macrophage phenotype modulation by CXCL4 in atherosclerosis. Front
Physiol. 2012;3:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00001.
99. Butcher MJ, Galkina EV.Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of macrophages and den-
dritic cell subsets in the healthy and atherosclerosis-prone aorta. Front Physiol. 2012;3:44.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00044.
100. Shalhoub J, Falck-Hansen MA, Davies AH, Monaco C. Innate immunity and
monocyte-
org/10.1186/1476-9255-8-9.
101. Liu YC, Zou XB, Chai YF, Yao YM.Macrophage polarization in inammatory diseases. Int J
Biol Sci. 2014;10:520–9.
102. Martinez FO, Gordon S.The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reas-
sessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13. https://doi.org/10.12703/P6-13.
103. Guilliams M, Mildner A, Yona S.Developmental and functional heterogeneity of monocytes.
Immunity. 2018;49:595–613.
104. Jung S.Macrophages and monocytes in 2017: macrophages and monocytes: of tortoises and
hares. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:85–6.
105. Glass CK, Natoli G. Molecular control of activation and priming in macrophages. Nat
Immunol. 2016;17:26–33.
macrophage activation in atherosclerosis. J Inamm. 2011;8:9. https://doi.
S. Fernando et al.

Pathophysiology ofAtherosclerosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
2
45
Further Reading
Galkina E, Kadl A, Sanders J, Varughese D, Sarembock IJ, Ley K.Lymphocyte recruitment into
the aortic wall before and during development of atherosclerosis is partially L-selectin depen-
dent. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1273–82.
Hansson GK. Inammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.
2005;352:1685–95.
Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P.Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inammation. Nat
Rev Immunol. 2013;13:159–75.
Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EA.Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2013;13:709–21.
Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N.Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of
C-reactive protein, brinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screen-
ing as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001;285:2481–5.
Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, Theurl I, Iwamoto Y, Figueiredo JL, etal. Local proliferation
dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1166–72.
Tabas I. Macrophage death and defective inammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2010;10:36–46.

Chapter 3
https://t.me/medicina_free
Mechanisms oftheVulnerable
Atherosclerotic Plaque andImaging
KhizarRana, StephenJ.Nicholls, andJohanW.Verjans
Key Learning Points
Plaque rupture and thrombosis are responsible for approximately 2 out of 3 of
•
acute ischaemic syndromes. Plaque erosion is distinct from plaque rupture, is less
well understood, and accounts for the majority of remaining non- rupture events.
• Vulnerable plaque features that predispose to plaque rupture include thin-cap
broatheromas, larger plaque volume, larger lipid-rich necrotic core, neovascu-
larization, intraplaque haemorrhage and spotty microcalcication.
• Imaging modalities including ultrasound, CT and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) have shown capability and value in detecting various vulnerable plaque
features noninvasively.
• Positron emission tomography (PET) scans can be used to image the biology of
plaque processes such as inammation and calcication that are implicated in
atherosclerosis and plaque rupture.
• Intravascular imaging, though invasive, offers superior spatial resolution to char-
acterise plaques beyond that which can be achieved with non-invasive modalities.
K. Rana
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
S. J. Nicholls
Monash Heart, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
J. W. Verjans (
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
e-mail: Johan.Verjans@SAHMRI.com
R. Fitridge (ed.), Mechanisms of Vascular Disease,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43683-4_3
*)
47© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

48
https://t.me/medicina_free
K. Rana et al.
3.1 Introduction
Atherosclerotic disease is the leading cause of death worldwide [1]. Acute plaque
thrombosis and subsequent occlusion of vessels is the mechanism underlying the
acute-ischaemic syndromes. Acute plaque thrombosis can be secondary to (1)
plaque rupture, (2) plaque erosions or (3) calcied nodules.
3.2 Plaque Rupture
Plaque rupture is dened as a disruption in the brous cap leading to a thrombosis
that communicates with the necrotic core and is usually occlusive (Fig. 3.1).
Plaque rupture is responsible for the vast majority (70–80%) of acute-ischaemic
syndromes [2, 3]. Various plaque morphological features are known risk factors
for a plaque rupture. These include thin-cap broatheromas, larger volume
plaques, larger lipid- rich necrotic core, neovascularization, intraplaque haemorrhage and spotty microcalcication. These plaque morphological features will be
discussed below.
3.2.1 Thin Cap Fibroatheromas
Atherosclerotic plaques with thin brous caps are more likely to rupture and expose
the thrombogenic plaque core to the blood. An autopsy study of sudden cardiovascular deaths found that 95% of ruptured plaques had a brous cap thickness of less
than 65μm and this lead to the term thin-cap broatheromas (TCFAs) being introduced to describe such lesions [4, 5]. TCFAs are the likely precursors of the majority of fatal coronary plaque ruptures [6] (Fig.3.1).
Fibrous cap thinning probably occurs due to two concurrent mechanisms; (1)
decreased matrix production by smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and (2) increased
matrix breakdown by inltrating macrophages that secrete proteolytic enzymes
such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Decreased production of collagen
occurs due to the depletion of smooth muscle cells as a result of apoptosis [7, 8].
Additionally, in-vitro studies have shown that interferon-gamma released from activated T-cells can inhibit SMC collagen gene expression [9] and reduce the expression of an enzyme (lysyl oxidase) necessary for the crosslinking of collagen bres
[10]. Increased matrix breakdown is thought to result from the release of proteolytic
enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases, plasminogen activators and cathepsins
by macrophage foam cells. The matrix metalloproteinases are released as latent
zymogens which are subsequently activated by plasmin from macrophages, chymase from degranulating mast cells and trypsin [11]. Thus, thinning of the brous
cap occurs probably due to the pro-inammatory actions of inltrating macrophages
and activated T-cells.

3 Mechanisms oftheVulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque andImaging
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 3.1 Gross morphology of plaque rupture, thin-cap broatheroma and stable plaque. (Left)
Plaque rupture, a disruption of the thin-brous cap (red arrow) can be seen with an overlying
thrombus (Thr) forming. The thrombus is in direct contact with the necrotic core (NC). (Middle)
Thin-cap broatheroma (TCFA). The gross features of a TCFA include a thin brous cap (white
arrows indicating the thinnest point) overlying a large haemorrhagic necrotic core. (Right) Stable
Plaque, The stable plaque is characterized by brous tissue with heavy calcications (arrows).
(Reprinted from Narula, Nakano [
105])
49
3.2.2 Plaque Size andPositive Luminal Remodeling
Large plaques, which may not produce signicant vessel stenosis, are responsible
for the majority of acute plaque thromboses. This apparent anomaly can be explained
by the fact that large, vulnerable plaques are associated with positive remodeling,
whereby the degree of ow-limiting stenosis is attenuated by reactive changes in the
underlying wall [12]. Metalloproteinases, the same enzymes that are believed to play
a role in the thinning of brous caps, are believed to have an important role in the
positive remodeling response [13, 14]. In vivo ultrasound studies have shown that
large plaques and positive remodeling are associated with unstable angina whilst
negative remodeling is associated with stable angina [12, 15]. Additionally, a larger
luminal diameter, as seen in positive remodeling, is associated with a higher peak
circumferential stress on the brous cap, potentially making it more prone to rupture.
3.2.3 Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core
In early atherogenesis, diffuse intimal thickening (DIT) consisting of SMCs, elastin
and proteoglycans develops in the arterial wall. Lipoproteins then accumulate in the
intimal wall and attract macrophages that engulf the lipoproteins and secrete proteolytic enzymes, leading to the development of a lipid-rich necrotic core.
Plaque rupture is more likely to occur where the brous cap is thinnest. For
eccentric plaques, this is often at the junction of the brous cap and the adjacent
wall, known as the shoulder region [16]. Plaques with a higher cross-sectional area
of lipid-rich core have been associated with an increased risk of rupture and thrombosis in the aorta [17, 18]. A large, eccentric lipid core may cause redistribution of
circumferential stress to the vulnerable shoulder region of the brous cap, and thus

50
https://t.me/medicina_free
increasing the likelihood of rupture or alternatively, an expansion of the lipid core
may erode the brous cap from below. Additionally, the lipid-rich core has a high
density of tissue factor making it highly thrombogenic when exposed to blood following plaque rupture [19].
K. Rana et al.
3.2.4 Neovascularisation andPlaque Haemorrhage
Neovascularisation is a common feature of vulnerable plaques. In the coronary circulation, the intima lacks vasa vasorum, whereas the outer media and adventitia
have a blood supply. Intimal thickening and inammation in atherosclerosis
increases the demand for oxygen above that which can be supplied by the vasa vasorum in the adventitia and hence causes hypoxia. Hypoxia and the concomitant
inammation induce the release of angiogenic factors (e.g. VEGF) that promote
angiogenesis. The sprouting vessels extend from the adventitia, through the media
and into the plaque [20]. However, these microvessels are thin-walled, lined with
discontinuous endothelium and have a lack of supporting SMCs. Disruption of
these fragile microvessels is believed to result in intraplaque haemorrhage and
extravasation of proteins and inammatory cells [21, 22].
Intraplaque haemorrhage is associated with an increase in the size of the necrotic
core, and is more frequently seen in lesions prone to rupture [23]. Clinically, studies
have shown a strong association between the presence of symptomatic carotid disease and the degree of plaque vascularity and quantity of intraplaque haemorrhage
[24, 25]. Erythrocytes have membranes rich in cholesterol. In atherosclerotic plaques,
the cholesterol in the erythrocyte membranes is liberated by an enzyme called sphingomyelinase, leading to increased cholesterol deposition in the plaque [26, 27]. Thus,
neovascularization and intraplaque haemorrhage destabilise the plaque by increasing
macrophage inltration, cholesterol deposition and expanding the necrotic core.
3.2.5 Calcication
Coronary artery calcication (CAC) is an important marker of plaque burden that
aids in cardiovascular risk stratication beyond that of the traditional risk factors
[28, 29]. Different patterns of calcication can be observed. Spotty (micro) calcication is associated with acute coronary syndromes, whereas extensive calcication
is regarded as a marker of plaque stability and is more prevalent in the stable angina
cohort [30]. Spotty calcication is further associated with other features of a vulnerable plaque including a larger total atheroma volume, brofatty plaques and positive
remodeling. Mechanistically, biomechanical studies suggest that the dense spotty
calcication on the softer brous cap can create a larger stress concentration at the
interface of the hard calcication and soft brous cap and this may lead to the sudden rupture of the brous cap [31]. Additionally, the size, shape, location, proximity
to other calcications and composition of the microcalcications may also play an
important role in determining the peak stress on the brous cap.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
