Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3774_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
40
https://t.me/medicina_free
3. Wentzel JJ, Chatzizisis YS, Gijsen FJ, Giannoglou GD, Feldman CL, Stone PH.Endothelial
shear stress in the evolution of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vascular remodelling: cur­rent understanding and remaining questions. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;96:234–43.
4. Shahawy S, Libby P.Atherosclerosis. In: Lilly, Leonard S, editors. Pathophysiology of heart
disease. Philadelphia: ProQuest eBook Central: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. p.112–33.
5. Psaltis PJ, Simari RD. Vascular wall progenitor cells in health and disease. Circ Res.
2015;116:1392–412.
6. Talman AH, Psaltis PJ, Cameron JD, Meredith IT, Seneviratne SK, Wong DT.Epicardial adi-
pose tissue: far more than a fat depot. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014;4:416–29.
7. Stenmark KR, Yeager ME, El Kasmi KC, Nozik-Grayck E, Gerasimovskaya EV, Li M, etal.
The adventitia: essential regulator of vascular wall structure and function. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:23–47.
8. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM.Lessons from sudden coronary
death: a comprehensive morphological classication scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1262–75.
9. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Gold HK, Yuan J, Narula J, etal. The thin-cap broatheroma:
a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:285–92.
10. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary risk factors
and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1276–82.
11. Sakakura K, Nakano M, Otsuka F, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R.Pathophysiology of
atherosclerosis plaque progression. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:399–411.
12. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang Y, Smialek JE, Virmani R.Plaque rupture and sudden
death related to exertion in men with coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1999;281:921–6.
13. Kolodgie FD, Narula J, Burke AP, Haider N, Farb A, Hui-Liang Y, et al. Localization of
apoptotic macrophages at the site of plaque rupture in sudden coronary death. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:1259–68.
14. Sukhova GK, Schonbeck U, Rabkin E, Schoen FJ, Poole AR, Billinghurst RC, etal. Evidence
for increased collagenolysis by interstitial collagenases-1 and -3in vulnerable human athero­matous plaques. Circulation. 1999;99:2503–9.
15. Vengrenyuk Y, Carlier S, Xanthos S, Cardoso L, Ganatos P, Virmani R, etal. A hypothesis for
vulnerable plaque rupture due to stress-induced debonding around cellular microcalcications in thin brous caps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14678–83.
16. Gijsen FJ, Wentzel JJ, Thury A, Mastik F, Schaar JA, Schuurbiers JC, etal. Strain distribu-
tion over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H1608–14.
17. Otsuka F, Sakakura K, Yahagi K, Joner M, Virmani R.Has our understanding of calcica-
tion in human coronary atherosclerosis progressed? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34: 724–36.
18. Badimon L, Vilahur G.Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture. J
Intern Med. 2014;276:618–32.
19. Dhawan SS, Avati Nanjundappa RP, Branch JR, Taylor WR, Quyyumi AA, Jo H, etal. Shear
stress and plaque development. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8:545–56.
20. Gimbrone MA Jr, Garcia-Cardena G.Vascular endothelium, hemodynamics, and the pathobi-
ology of atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2013;22:9–15.
21. Shapiro MD, Fazio S. From lipids to inammation: new approaches to reducing atheroscle-
rotic risk. Circ Res. 2016;118:732–49.
22. Hansson GK. Inammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.
2005;352:1685–95.
23. Aluganti Narasimhulu C, Fernandez-Ruiz I, Selvarajan K, Jiang X, Sengupta B, Riad A,
et al. Atherosclerosis—do we know enough already to prevent it? Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2016;27:92–102.
S. Fernando et al.
2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pathophysiology ofAtherosclerosis
24. Woollard KJ, Geissmann F. Monocytes in atherosclerosis: subsets and functions. Nat Rev
Cardiol. 2010;7:77–86.
25. Ley K, Miller YI, Hedrick CC. Monocyte and macrophage dynamics during atherogenesis.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1506–16.
26. Chistiakov DA, Bobryshev YV, Orekhov AN.Macrophage-mediated cholesterol handling in
atherosclerosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20:17–28.
27. Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EA. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat
Rev Immunol. 2013;13:709–21.
28. Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, Theurl I, Iwamoto Y, Figueiredo JL, et al. Local
proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1166–72.
29. Galkina E, Kadl A, Sanders J, Varughese D, Sarembock IJ, Ley K. Lymphocyte recruitment
into the aortic wall before and during development of atherosclerosis is partially L-selectin dependent. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1273–82.
30. Wu MY, Li CJ, Hou MF, Chu PY.New insights into the role of inammation in the patho-
genesis of atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijms18102034.
31. Michael A, Seidman RNM, Stone JR.Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. In: Cellular and
molecular pathobiology of cardiovascular disease. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc; 2014. p.221–37.
32. Weber C, Noels H.Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat Med.
2011;17:1410–22.
33. Hansson GK, Nilsson J. Vaccination against atherosclerosis? Induction of atheroprotective
immunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2009;31:95–101.
34. Hansson GK, Jonasson L. The discovery of cellular immunity in the atherosclerotic plaque.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:1714–7.
35. Dilley RJ, McGeachie JK, Prendergast FJ.A review of the proliferative behaviour, morphol-
ogy and phenotypes of vascular smooth muscle. Atherosclerosis. 1987;63:99–107.
36. Tabas I, Garcia-Cardena G, Owens GK.Recent insights into the cellular biology of atheroscle-
rosis. J Cell Biol. 2015;209:13–22.
37. Alexander MR, Owens GK.Epigenetic control of smooth muscle cell differentiation and phe-
notypic switching in vascular development and disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:13–40.
38. Newby AC.Molecular and cell biology of native coronary and vein-graft atherosclerosis: regu-
lation of plaque stability and vessel-wall remodelling by growth factors and cell- extracellular matrix interactions. Coron Artery Dis. 1997;8:213–24.
39. van Vlijmen BJ, Gerritsen G, Franken AL, Boesten LS, Kockx MM, Gijbels MJ, et al.
Macrophage p53 deciency leads to enhanced atherosclerosis in APOE3-Leiden transgenic mice. Circ Res. 2001;88:780–6.
40. Liu J, Thewke DP, Su YR, Linton MF, Fazio S, Sinensky MS.Reduced macrophage apoptosis
is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:174–9.
41. Arai S, Shelton JM, Chen M, Bradley MN, Castrillo A, Bookout AL, etal. A role for the
apoptosis inhibitory factor AIM/Spalpha/Api6in atherosclerosis development. Cell Metab. 2005;1:201–13.
42. Tabas I.Macrophage death and defective inammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2010;10:36–46.
43. Clarke MC, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, Littlewood TD, etal. Apoptosis
of vascular smooth muscle cells induces features of plaque vulnerability in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2006;12:1075–80.
44. Moore KJ, Tabas I.Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145:341–55.
45. Clarke MC, Bennett MR.Cause or consequence: what does macrophage apoptosis do in ath-
erosclerosis? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:153–5.
46. Ho CY, Shanahan CM.Medial arterial calcication: an overlooked player in peripheral arterial
disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36:1475–82.
41
42
https://t.me/medicina_free
47. Speer MY, Giachelli CM. Regulation of cardiovascular calcication. Cardiovasc Pathol.
2004;13:63–70.
48. Giachelli CM.Vascular calcication mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:2959–64.
49. Clarke MC, Littlewood TD, Figg N, Maguire JJ, Davenport AP, Goddard M, et al. Chronic
apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells accelerates atherosclerosis and promotes calcica­tion and medial degeneration. Circ Res. 2008;102:1529–38.
50. Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Hegyi L, Bennett MR, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL. Apoptosis
regulates human vascular calcication invitro: evidence for initiation of vascular calcication by apoptotic bodies. Circ Res. 2000;87:1055–62.
51. Rocha-Singh KJ, Zeller T, Jaff MR.Peripheral arterial calcication: prevalence, mechanism,
detection, and clinical implications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:E212–20.
52. Johnson RC, Leopold JA, Loscalzo J.Vascular calcication: pathobiological mechanisms and
clinical implications. Circ Res. 2006;99:1044–59.
53. Fukumoto Y, Libby P, Rabkin E, Hill CC, Enomoto M, Hirouchi Y, etal. Statins alter smooth
muscle cell accumulation and collagen content in established atheroma of watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation. 2001;103:993–9.
54. Luan Z, Chase AJ, Newby AC. Statins inhibit secretion of metalloproteinases-1,-2,-3,
and-9 from vascular smooth muscle cells and macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(5):769–75.
55. Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J, Nilsson J. Pravastatin treatment
increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation. 2001;103:926–33.
56. Barger AC, Beeuwkes R 3rd, Lainey LL, Silverman KJ.Hypothesis: vasa vasorum and neovas-
cularization of human coronary arteries. A possible role in the pathophysiology of atheroscle­rosis. N Eng J Med. 1984;310:175–7.
57. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Finn AV, Gold HK, Tulenko TN, etal. Atherosclerotic
plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hem­orrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2054–61.
58. Shah PK, Falk E, Badimon JJ, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Mailhac A, Villareal-Levy G, etal. Human
monocyte-derived macrophages induce collagen breakdown in brous caps of atherosclerotic plaques. Potential role of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases and implications for plaque rupture. Circulation. 1995;92:1565–9.
59. Galis ZS, Khatri JJ.Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the
good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res. 2002;90:251–62.
60. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, etal. A denition of
advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classication of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355–74.
61. Dalager S, Paaske WP, Kristensen IB, Laurberg JM, Falk E.Artery-related differences in ath-
erosclerosis expression: implications for atherogenesis and dynamics in intima-media thick­ness. Stroke. 2007;38:2698–705.
62. Barua RS, Ambrose JA. Mechanisms of coronary thrombosis in cigarette smoke exposure.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1460–7.
63. Braunwald E. Coronary plaque erosion: recognition and management. JACC Cardiovasc
Imaging. 2013;6(3):288–9.
64. Jia H, Abtahian F, Aguirre AD, Lee S, Chia S, Lowe H, etal. In vivo diagnosis of plaque ero-
sion and calcied nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome by intravascular optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1748–58.
65. Lieschke GJ, Grail D, Hodgson G, Metcalf D, Stanley E, Cheers C, etal. Mice lacking granu-
locyte colony-stimulating factor have chronic neutropenia, granulocyte and macrophage pro­genitor cell deciency, and impaired neutrophil mobilization. Blood. 1994;84:1737–46.
66. Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A. NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons. Trends
Immunol. 2009;30:513–21.
S. Fernando et al.
2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Pathophysiology ofAtherosclerosis
67. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P.Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inammation.
Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:159–75.
68. Dorweiler B, Torzewski M, Dahm M, Kirkpatrick CJ, Lackner KJ, Vahl CF.Subendothelial
inltration of neutrophil granulocytes and liberation of matrix-destabilizing enzymes in an experimental model of human neo-intima. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99:373–81.
69. Kramer MC, Rittersma SZ, de Winter RJ, Ladich ER, Fowler DR, Liang YH, etal. Relationship
of thrombus healing to underlying plaque morphology in sudden coronary death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:122–32.
70. Gupta AK, Joshi MB, Philippova M, Erne P, Hasler P, Hahn S, et al. Activated endothelial
cells induce neutrophil extracellular traps and are susceptible to NETosis-mediated cell death. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:3193–7.
71. Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW, Libby P.Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases
and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:2493–503.
72. Binder CJ, Chou MY, Fogelstrand L, Hartvigsen K, Shaw PX, Boullier A, etal. Natural anti-
bodies in murine atherosclerosis. Curr Drug Targets. 2008;9:190–5.
73. Mosca L.C-reactive protein—to screen or not to screen? N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1615–7.
74. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Lepage S, Braunwald E.Elevation of tumor necro-
sis factor-alpha and increased risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000;101:2149–53.
75. Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, Smith LC, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, etal. Circulating
adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and inci­dent coronary heart disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 1997;96:4219–25.
76. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Roitman-Johnson B, Stampfer MJ, Allen J.Plasma concentration
of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and risks of future myocardial infarction in appar­ently healthy men. Lancet. 1998;351:88–92.
77. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N.Soluble P-selectin and the risk of future cardiovascular events.
Circulation. 2001;103:491–5.
78. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N.Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a compari-
son of C-reactive protein, brinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001;285:2481–5.
79. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N.C-reactive protein and other markers of inam-
mation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Eng J Med. 2000;342:836–43.
80. Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Tracy RP, Corti MC, Wacholder S, Ettinger WH Jr, etal. Associations
of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 1999;106:506–12.
81. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB.Production of C-reactive
protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European concerted action on thrombosis and disabilities angina pectoris study group. Lancet. 1997;349:462–6.
82. Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ.Familial hypercholesterolemias: prevalence,
genetics, diagnosis and screening recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2011;5:S9–17.
83. Bouhairie VE, Goldberg AC.Familial hypercholesterolemia. Cardiol Clin. 2015;33:169–79.
84. Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, etal. Homozygous
familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detec­tion and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2146–57.
85. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS,
etal. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general popu­lation: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3478–90a.
86. Dahlen GH, Stenlund H. Lp(a) lipoprotein is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease:
pathogenic mechanisms and clinical signicance. Clin Genet. 1997;52:272–80.
43
44
https://t.me/medicina_free
87. Do R, Stitziel NO, Won HH, Jorgensen AB, Duga S, Angelica Merlini P, et al. Exome
sequencing identies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarc­tion. Nature. 2015;518:102–6.
88. McCully KS. Homocysteine and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Expert Rev Clin
Pharmacol. 2015;8:211–9.
89. Vacek TP, Rehman S, Neamtu D, Yu S, Givimani S, Tyagi SC.Matrix metalloproteinases in
atherosclerosis: role of nitric oxide, hydrogen sulde, homocysteine, and polymorphisms. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:173–83.
90. Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, Sengupta S, Peloso GM, Gustafsson S, Kanoni S, etal. Discovery
and renement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1274–83.
91. Chaturvedi N.Ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2003;89:681–6.
92. Tillin T, Hughes AD, Whincup P, Mayet J, Sattar N, McKeigue PM, et al. Ethnicity and
prediction of cardiovascular disease: performance of QRISK2 and Framingham scores in a U.K. tri-ethnic prospective cohort study (SABRE—Southall And Brent REvisited). Heart. 2014;100:60–7.
93. Qiu J, Zheng Y, Hu J, Liao D, Gregersen H, Deng X, etal. Biomechanical regulation of vas-
cular smooth muscle cell functions: from invitro to invivo understanding. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11:20130852.
94. Tsao CW, Vasan RS.Cohort prole: the Framingham Heart Study (FHS): overview of mile-
stones in cardiovascular epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1800–13.
95. Amizuka N, Hasegawa T, Oda K, Luiz de Freitas PH, Hoshi K, Li M, etal. Histology of
epiphyseal cartilage calcication and endochondral ossication. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012;4:2085–100.
96. Holman RL, Mc GH Jr, Strong JP, Geer JC. The natural history of atherosclerosis: the
early aortic lesions as seen in New Orleans in the middle of the 20th century. Am J Pathol. 1958;34:209–35.
97. Bobryshev YV, Ivanova EA, Chistiakov DA, Nikiforov NG, Orekhov AN.Macrophages and
their role in atherosclerosis: pathophysiology and transcriptome analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9582430.
98. Gleissner CA. Macrophage phenotype modulation by CXCL4 in atherosclerosis. Front
Physiol. 2012;3:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00001.
99. Butcher MJ, Galkina EV.Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of macrophages and den-
dritic cell subsets in the healthy and atherosclerosis-prone aorta. Front Physiol. 2012;3:44.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00044.
100. Shalhoub J, Falck-Hansen MA, Davies AH, Monaco C. Innate immunity and
monocyte-
org/10.1186/1476-9255-8-9.
101. Liu YC, Zou XB, Chai YF, Yao YM.Macrophage polarization in inammatory diseases. Int J
Biol Sci. 2014;10:520–9.
102. Martinez FO, Gordon S.The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reas-
sessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13. https://doi.org/10.12703/P6-13.
103. Guilliams M, Mildner A, Yona S.Developmental and functional heterogeneity of monocytes.
Immunity. 2018;49:595–613.
104. Jung S.Macrophages and monocytes in 2017: macrophages and monocytes: of tortoises and
hares. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:85–6.
105. Glass CK, Natoli G. Molecular control of activation and priming in macrophages. Nat
Immunol. 2016;17:26–33.
macrophage activation in atherosclerosis. J Inamm. 2011;8:9. https://doi.
S. Fernando et al.
Pathophysiology ofAtherosclerosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
2
45
Further Reading
Galkina E, Kadl A, Sanders J, Varughese D, Sarembock IJ, Ley K.Lymphocyte recruitment into
the aortic wall before and during development of atherosclerosis is partially L-selectin depen-
dent. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1273–82. Hansson GK. Inammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.
2005;352:1685–95. Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P.Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inammation. Nat
Rev Immunol. 2013;13:159–75. Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EA.Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2013;13:709–21. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N.Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of
C-reactive protein, brinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screen-
ing as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001;285:2481–5. Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, Theurl I, Iwamoto Y, Figueiredo JL, etal. Local proliferation
dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1166–72. Tabas I. Macrophage death and defective inammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev
Immunol. 2010;10:36–46.
Chapter 3
https://t.me/medicina_free
Mechanisms oftheVulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque andImaging
KhizarRana, StephenJ.Nicholls, andJohanW.Verjans
Key Learning Points
Plaque rupture and thrombosis are responsible for approximately 2 out of 3 of
acute ischaemic syndromes. Plaque erosion is distinct from plaque rupture, is less
well understood, and accounts for the majority of remaining non- rupture events.
• Vulnerable plaque features that predispose to plaque rupture include thin-cap
broatheromas, larger plaque volume, larger lipid-rich necrotic core, neovascu-
larization, intraplaque haemorrhage and spotty microcalcication.
• Imaging modalities including ultrasound, CT and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) have shown capability and value in detecting various vulnerable plaque
features noninvasively.
• Positron emission tomography (PET) scans can be used to image the biology of
plaque processes such as inammation and calcication that are implicated in
atherosclerosis and plaque rupture.
• Intravascular imaging, though invasive, offers superior spatial resolution to char-
acterise plaques beyond that which can be achieved with non-invasive modalities.
K. Rana South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
S. J. Nicholls Monash Heart, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
J. W. Verjans ( South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia e-mail: Johan.Verjans@SAHMRI.com
R. Fitridge (ed.), Mechanisms of Vascular Disease,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43683-4_3
*)
47© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
48
https://t.me/medicina_free
K. Rana et al.
3.1 Introduction
Atherosclerotic disease is the leading cause of death worldwide [1]. Acute plaque thrombosis and subsequent occlusion of vessels is the mechanism underlying the acute-ischaemic syndromes. Acute plaque thrombosis can be secondary to (1) plaque rupture, (2) plaque erosions or (3) calcied nodules.
3.2 Plaque Rupture
Plaque rupture is dened as a disruption in the brous cap leading to a thrombosis that communicates with the necrotic core and is usually occlusive (Fig. 3.1). Plaque rupture is responsible for the vast majority (70–80%) of acute-ischaemic syndromes [2, 3]. Various plaque morphological features are known risk factors for a plaque rupture. These include thin-cap broatheromas, larger volume plaques, larger lipid- rich necrotic core, neovascularization, intraplaque haemor­rhage and spotty microcalcication. These plaque morphological features will be discussed below.
3.2.1 Thin Cap Fibroatheromas
Atherosclerotic plaques with thin brous caps are more likely to rupture and expose the thrombogenic plaque core to the blood. An autopsy study of sudden cardiovas­cular deaths found that 95% of ruptured plaques had a brous cap thickness of less than 65μm and this lead to the term thin-cap broatheromas (TCFAs) being intro­duced to describe such lesions [4, 5]. TCFAs are the likely precursors of the major­ity of fatal coronary plaque ruptures [6] (Fig.3.1).
Fibrous cap thinning probably occurs due to two concurrent mechanisms; (1) decreased matrix production by smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and (2) increased matrix breakdown by inltrating macrophages that secrete proteolytic enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Decreased production of collagen occurs due to the depletion of smooth muscle cells as a result of apoptosis [7, 8]. Additionally, in-vitro studies have shown that interferon-gamma released from acti­vated T-cells can inhibit SMC collagen gene expression [9] and reduce the expres­sion of an enzyme (lysyl oxidase) necessary for the crosslinking of collagen bres [10]. Increased matrix breakdown is thought to result from the release of proteolytic enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases, plasminogen activators and cathepsins by macrophage foam cells. The matrix metalloproteinases are released as latent zymogens which are subsequently activated by plasmin from macrophages, chy­mase from degranulating mast cells and trypsin [11]. Thus, thinning of the brous cap occurs probably due to the pro-inammatory actions of inltrating macrophages and activated T-cells.
3 Mechanisms oftheVulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque andImaging
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 3.1 Gross morphology of plaque rupture, thin-cap broatheroma and stable plaque. (Left) Plaque rupture, a disruption of the thin-brous cap (red arrow) can be seen with an overlying thrombus (Thr) forming. The thrombus is in direct contact with the necrotic core (NC). (Middle) Thin-cap broatheroma (TCFA). The gross features of a TCFA include a thin brous cap (white arrows indicating the thinnest point) overlying a large haemorrhagic necrotic core. (Right) Stable Plaque, The stable plaque is characterized by brous tissue with heavy calcications (arrows). (Reprinted from Narula, Nakano [
105])
49
3.2.2 Plaque Size andPositive Luminal Remodeling
Large plaques, which may not produce signicant vessel stenosis, are responsible for the majority of acute plaque thromboses. This apparent anomaly can be explained by the fact that large, vulnerable plaques are associated with positive remodeling, whereby the degree of ow-limiting stenosis is attenuated by reactive changes in the underlying wall [12]. Metalloproteinases, the same enzymes that are believed to play a role in the thinning of brous caps, are believed to have an important role in the positive remodeling response [13, 14]. In vivo ultrasound studies have shown that large plaques and positive remodeling are associated with unstable angina whilst negative remodeling is associated with stable angina [12, 15]. Additionally, a larger luminal diameter, as seen in positive remodeling, is associated with a higher peak circumferential stress on the brous cap, potentially making it more prone to rupture.
3.2.3 Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core
In early atherogenesis, diffuse intimal thickening (DIT) consisting of SMCs, elastin and proteoglycans develops in the arterial wall. Lipoproteins then accumulate in the intimal wall and attract macrophages that engulf the lipoproteins and secrete proteo­lytic enzymes, leading to the development of a lipid-rich necrotic core.
Plaque rupture is more likely to occur where the brous cap is thinnest. For eccentric plaques, this is often at the junction of the brous cap and the adjacent wall, known as the shoulder region [16]. Plaques with a higher cross-sectional area of lipid-rich core have been associated with an increased risk of rupture and throm­bosis in the aorta [17, 18]. A large, eccentric lipid core may cause redistribution of circumferential stress to the vulnerable shoulder region of the brous cap, and thus
50
https://t.me/medicina_free
increasing the likelihood of rupture or alternatively, an expansion of the lipid core may erode the brous cap from below. Additionally, the lipid-rich core has a high density of tissue factor making it highly thrombogenic when exposed to blood fol­lowing plaque rupture [19].
K. Rana et al.
3.2.4 Neovascularisation andPlaque Haemorrhage
Neovascularisation is a common feature of vulnerable plaques. In the coronary cir­culation, the intima lacks vasa vasorum, whereas the outer media and adventitia have a blood supply. Intimal thickening and inammation in atherosclerosis increases the demand for oxygen above that which can be supplied by the vasa vaso­rum in the adventitia and hence causes hypoxia. Hypoxia and the concomitant inammation induce the release of angiogenic factors (e.g. VEGF) that promote angiogenesis. The sprouting vessels extend from the adventitia, through the media and into the plaque [20]. However, these microvessels are thin-walled, lined with discontinuous endothelium and have a lack of supporting SMCs. Disruption of these fragile microvessels is believed to result in intraplaque haemorrhage and extravasation of proteins and inammatory cells [21, 22].
Intraplaque haemorrhage is associated with an increase in the size of the necrotic core, and is more frequently seen in lesions prone to rupture [23]. Clinically, studies have shown a strong association between the presence of symptomatic carotid dis­ease and the degree of plaque vascularity and quantity of intraplaque haemorrhage [24, 25]. Erythrocytes have membranes rich in cholesterol. In atherosclerotic plaques, the cholesterol in the erythrocyte membranes is liberated by an enzyme called sphin­gomyelinase, leading to increased cholesterol deposition in the plaque [26, 27]. Thus, neovascularization and intraplaque haemorrhage destabilise the plaque by increasing macrophage inltration, cholesterol deposition and expanding the necrotic core.
3.2.5 Calcication
Coronary artery calcication (CAC) is an important marker of plaque burden that aids in cardiovascular risk stratication beyond that of the traditional risk factors [28, 29]. Different patterns of calcication can be observed. Spotty (micro) calci­cation is associated with acute coronary syndromes, whereas extensive calcication is regarded as a marker of plaque stability and is more prevalent in the stable angina cohort [30]. Spotty calcication is further associated with other features of a vulner­able plaque including a larger total atheroma volume, brofatty plaques and positive remodeling. Mechanistically, biomechanical studies suggest that the dense spotty calcication on the softer brous cap can create a larger stress concentration at the interface of the hard calcication and soft brous cap and this may lead to the sud­den rupture of the brous cap [31]. Additionally, the size, shape, location, proximity to other calcications and composition of the microcalcications may also play an important role in determining the peak stress on the brous cap.