Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3774_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
20 Мб
Скачать
6 Vascular Biology ofSmooth Muscle Cells andRestenosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
for CX3CR1 [10]. It is expressed on VSMCs and it has been found, that when mono­cytes are incubated with oxidised LDL, they upregulate their expression of CX3CR1. This then increases monocyte binding to membrane-bound CX3CL1 on VSMC that serves to anchor the monocytes to the VSMCs [11].
121
6.2.4 VSMC Apoptosis
VSMC are believed to play a central role in stabilising the plaque through the devel­opment of the cap. VSMC apoptosis is therefore likely to inuence the stability of the plaque. In early-stage plaques, the level of apoptosis is found to be very low and starts to increase with increasing plaque size [12]. Plaque rupture occurs most­commonly at the shoulder regions of the plaque in which there are lower numbers of VSMCs and higher number of macrophages. This suggests that VSMC apoptosis is induced by macrophages at the shoulder region sites, triggering plaque rupture. In support of this, it has been shown that there are increased levels of VSMC apoptosis in symptomatic plaques when compared with stable plaques [13].
Another complication of VSMC apoptosis in atherosclerosis is that it is associ­ated with increased inammation. Interestingly, this increase in inammation does not occur for VSMC apoptosis that is associated with vascular ageing or medial degeneration. The reason underlying this discrepancy is thought to be due to a lack of efciency in the clearance of apoptotic VSMCs in atherosclerosis as well as a slower clearance of inammatory cytokines released from dying cells [5]. Dying apoptotic VSMCs release IL-1β and necrotic VSMCs release IL-1α. In a healthy vessel, VSMCs are very efcient at clearing apoptotic VSMCs within ~48 h. However, in the presence of hyperlipidaemia, the phagocytotic capacity of VSMCs is impaired, thereby delaying phagocytosis and apoptotic cell and cytokine clear­ance [14].
6.2.5 VSMCs Origins; Role inAtherosclerosis
Lineage tracing studies using genetically modied mice that enable tracking of cells have revealed that VSMCs arise from a number of different developmental origins. For example, the VSMCs in the ascending aorta and aortic arch as well as the head and neck vessels originate from the neural crest. Coronary VSMCs are generated from the epicardium and the descending aorta VSMCs arise from somatic meso­derm precursors [15]. The importance of this is that these different developmental origins can have signicant effects on the development of atherosclerosis. For example, the descending thoracic aorta is relatively resistant to atherosclerosis when compared to the aortic arch that rapidly develops plaque. The thoracic aorta has a signicantly higher level of expression of the developmental genes, the Homeobox genes, and a reciprocal relationship with NF-κB, a transcription factor that drives
122
Re-endothelialisation
Neointimal hyperplasia
Thrombosis
Neoatherosclerosis
Adventitial progenitor contributions
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Nankivell et al.
inammation and atherosclerosis [16]. This suggests that there is a relationship between developmental origin and the susceptibility to developing atherosclerosis.
Other data supports this concept. When VSMCs from neutral crest origin are exposed to TGF-β, they increase their production of collagen. This does not occur, however, in VSMCs from the mesodermal zone. Furthermore, homocysteine, a pro­tein that is important in cardiovascular disease, will induce the proliferation of VSMCs from the neural crest but not from the mesoderm origin [17]. There are also variations in the propensity to develop atherosclerosis, undergo aortic aneurysm development and develop calcication [18].
VSMCs contribute to plaque development and stability by: (1) forming a stabi­lising ‘cap’, (2) differentiating in a highly proliferative synthetic VSMC phenotype, (3) undergoing apoptosis and (4) through VSMC progenitor cell contributions origi­nating from the adventitia.
6.2.6 Restenosis
VSMCs play a major role in the development of restenosis which is the process of rapid expansion of a neointima after vascular injury, also called neointimal hyper­plasia (Fig 6.3). Restenosis is driven predominantly by inammation, as a result of the vascular injury, and the inammation causes dysregulated VSMC proliferation and migration. It is a signicant problem following balloon angioplasty and stent deployment. The mechanisms and processes of restenosis are biologically distinct from atherosclerosis. Restenosis occurs over shorter time frames (months-years) compared to the decades that it takes for an atherosclerotic plaque to develop. A detailed discussion of restenosis will be included later in this Chapter.
SMC recruitment
-
-SMC proliferation/migration
-SMC differentiation
SMC progenitor
CXCL12
TNF-α
EC
SMC
CCL2
PDGF
Stent
Fig. 6.3 Multiple biological mechanisms associated with in-stent restenosis
EPC mobilisation/recruitment
-
EPC
CXCL12
IL-1β
Stent
platelet activation
-
-thrombus formation
Platelet
Stent
neutrophil activation
-
-monocyte/macrophage recruitment
Monocyte
CCL2
Stent
CCL5
Neutrophil
Macrophage
6 Vascular Biology ofSmooth Muscle Cells andRestenosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
123
6.2.7 Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype
6.2.7.1 Contractile Versus Synthetic Phenotype
VSMCs are highly plastic in nature which can play a signicant role in their contri­butions to atherosclerosis and restenosis. In a healthy adult vascular wall, VSMCs are able to regulate vasoconstriction and dilatation, and are known as the ‘contrac­tile’ phenotype. However, in response to injury, inammation or different growth factors, the phenotype of these VSMCs can change. During this switch, VMSCs down-regulate contractile functions and de-differentiate into a ‘synthetic’ VSMC phenotype that is highly proliferative and can have deleterious effects such as pro­moting atherosclerosis and restenosis growth. Synthetic VSMCs have diminished responses to vasodilators and constrictors and thereby exhibit reduced vascular function [2].
Changes in the cell surface marker expression prole is the most important way to characterise changes in VSMC phenotype and this correlates with changes in function. The contractile phenotype expresses markers that are vital to the SMC contraction machinery and cell anchorage including: SM-α-actin, SM-myosin heavy chain (MYH11), calponin, SM22α, smoothelin, h-caldesmon and others [19]. As VSMCs start to de-differentiate to the synthetic phenotype they start to lose these important contractile markers and increase their expression of proteins involved in cell cycle progression (cyclins, calmodulin) and ECM remodelling (matrix-metalloproteinases and collagen), and increase their expression of cyto­kines [19]. There are also signicant changes in morphology. The contractile elon­gated spindle-shaped phenotype starts to take on a rhomboid-like shape. There is, however, a broad range of morphological possibilities in between these two classi­cally described VSMC morphologies and also a large number of different combina­tions of phenotypic marker possibilities [20]. This diversity is caused through different stimuli or environmental cues, disease milieu and embryonic origin. In atherosclerosis, one example of the VSMC phenotype switch is their signicant loss of α-actin, an important marker of the contractile phenotype, with disease develop­ment. This has been validated in rigorous studies using transgenic mice that track SMC origins and fate. For example, it was demonstrated that greater than 80% of VSMC-derived cells within an established atherosclerotic plaque do not express alpha actin [
Recent studies have helped to clearly dene the role of phenotypic switching in atherosclerosis and there is a growing realisation that inhibition of the differentia­tion to the synthetic VSMC phenotype may suppress the progression of atheroscle­rosis. For example, mice heterozygous for myocardin (myocardin the expression of most VSMC contractile genes and therefore promotes the contrac­tile VSMC phenotype, have increased atherosclerosis when crossed with atherosclerosis- prone apolipoprotein (apo)E myocardin (i.e. myocardin phage recruitment to the plaques. Interestingly, these effects were reversed in a gain of function myocardin mouse [23].
21, 22].
/+
), that supports
/
/+
) also increased inammatory pathways and macro-
mouse. The loss of a single allele of
124
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Nankivell et al.
The role of Krϋppel-like factor-4 (KLF4) in phenotypic switching has been stud­ied extensively. KLF4 is required in VSMCs for PDGF and IL-1β-induced differen­tiation [24]. KLF4 is also found to regulate genes that control and inhibit myocardin. Deletion of KLF4 is able to prevent and delay phenotypic switching in vivo in VSMCs in a murine vascular injury model [25]. Interestingly, using a VSMCs­specic KLF4 knockout mouse, no change in phenotypic switching was detected but there was a reduction in plaque size and increased cap thickness [21].
There is accumulating evidence that micro-RNAs (mi-RNAs), short stretches (20–30 bases long) of non-coding RNA, play a role in phenotypic switching from a contractile to a synthetic VSMC phenotype. For example, bioinformatics analy­ses have predicted that miR let-7g modulates the switch. The target genes for let­7g were found to be the genes in the PDGF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEKK1)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/KLF4 signalling pathway, known to regulate phenotypic switching. Increased levels of let-7g were found to protect against PDGF and MEKK1-induced differentiation from the con­tractile to the synthetic VSMC phenotype. Furthermore, in vivo studies revealed that over- expression of let-7g in apoE
/
mice decreases atherosclerosis in
the aorta.
6.2.7.2 Trans-differentiation ofVSMCs toMacrophages
It is well-established that circulating monocytes inltrate the developing plaque and differentiate into macrophages that take-up modied low-density lipoproteins (LDL). More recently in both in vitro and in vivo studies, it has been discovered that VSMCs are also able to engulf modied LDL.It has been demonstrated that VSMCs are able to take up lipid and form foam cells. Upon internalisation of LDL, the VSMCs start to acquire a more macrophage-like phenotype and lose their SMC phenotype [26]. For example, lipid-loaded VSMCs will express macrophage mark­ers including CD86, Mac-2 and ABCA1. Concurrently they lose their expression of α-actin, tropomyosin, MYH11 and calponin. Accompanying this, lipid-loaded VSMCs express higher levels of inammatory proteins and are considered therefore to contribute to the expansion of the plaque in a deleterious fashion [27]. It should be noted that although VSMCs are able to engulf lipid, the overall phagocytic capac­ity of VSMCs is much lower than that of a professional phagocytic cell like the macrophage. These ndings were more recently conrmed in vivo. It was found
/
that, in apoE
mice, the cells lining the necrotic core of atherosclerotic plaques were positive for both VSMC and macrophage markers. Bioinformatic analysis also conrmed that lipid-loaded VSMCs expressed macrophage markers but overall expressed markers that were closer to the traditional VSMC state [5]. This, however, has the potential to also be deleterious. In this trans-differentiated state, macro­phages not only perform some of the unfavourable functions of macrophages and express more inammatory cytokines, they also have impaired benecial macro­phage functions including phagocytosis and efferocytosis (process by which apop­totic/necrotic cells are removed from the plaque).
6 Vascular Biology ofSmooth Muscle Cells andRestenosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
125
High-density lipoproteins (HDL) play a key role in efuxing cholesterol from cells. A recent study has demonstrated that incubation with the HDL sub-particle, HDL3 is able to reverse the trans-differentiation of VSMCs to macrophages follow­ing cholesterol-loading. This is likely to be via the ability of HDL to remove the excess cellular cholesterol. This was conrmed through the use of VSMCs with a deletion in the cholesterol transporter, ABCA-1, that mediates cholesterol efux from cells. Interestingly, the ability of HDL to reverse trans-differentiation was almost completely lost in these ABCA-1 knockout VSMCs. HDL3 was also able to restore the expression of myocardin and KLF4, key regulators of differentiation, to baseline levels following cholesterol loading [27].
Mi-RNAs are known to regulate the trans-differentiation, or conversion, of VSMCs to macrophages. For example, miR-143/145 regulates myocardin and is down regulated with cholesterol loading. Conversely, if miR-143/145 levels are maintained it is able to reverse cholesterol-loading-induced phenotypic change [27].
6.2.8 Smooth Muscle Progenitor Cells
There is increasing evidence indicating the presence of smooth muscle progenitor cells (SMPCs) in the vasculature. In fact, SMPCs have been located in each layer of the vessel wall including the intima/neointima, the media and the adventitia [15]. It is highly likely that these tissue resident vascular progenitor cells also make contri­butions to the development of both atherosclerosis and restenosis. There is also evidence, although controversial, that bone marrow-derived SMPCs can contribute to disease development that will be discussed in this section.
The disease milieu surrounding sites of atherosclerosis or restenosis including inammatory factors, reactive oxygen species (ROS), hyperlipidaemia and hyper­tension, are all likely to affect the migration, proliferation, mobilisation and differ­entiation of SMPCs. In hypertension, for example, there is intimal thickening and expansion of the media of the blood vessels. There is also an increase in the expres­sion of α-actin. This is suggestive of the possibility that progenitor cells may have contributed to this adaptive response through enhanced migration and proliferation in the media, stimulated by inammatory cues. In support of this concept, it has been demonstrated that SMCs in the neointima of vessel allografts originate from a local source of progenitor cells that were not from a bone marrow-derived source [28]. Furthermore, it has been shown that there is a local vessel source of SMCs that con­tributes to atherosclerotic plaque development [29]. Other studies have shown that, after femoral artery injury, more than 50% of the SMCs in the neointima are derived from adventitial progenitor cells. These ndings were supported further by a mouse model that enabled specic lineage tracing of the SMC origin and showed deni­tively that for an injured artery the main source of SMCs are adventitial progenitor cells. In the apoE tracking that adventitial cells migrate into the media and the developing neointima of the plaque and differentiate into SMCs. In summary, local progenitor populations
/
model of atherosclerosis it has also been shown using fate-
126
https://t.me/medicina_free
from the vasculature, particularly the adventitia, differentiate into SMCs and can contribute to the development of restenosis and atherosclerosis disease processes.
It has been reported that bone marrow-derived SMPCs make contributions to the development of atherosclerosis and restenosis. Apoptotic VSMCs at sites of vascu­lar injury have increasedexpression of the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α). SDF-1α has a well-established role in promoting the mobilisation, migra­tion and recruitment of bone marrow-derived progenitor cells to sites of injury or repair. This suggests that apoptotic VSMCs, through their expression of SDF-1α, may be attempting to recruit bone marrow-derived SMPCs to the injured site. Studies have reported the existence of SMPCs in mouse models of arterial injury and neointimal hyperplasia [30]. It is also reported that bone marrow-derived SMPCs are present in atherosclerotic plaque, albeit very few. Subsequent SMC­specic lineage-tracking studies in transgenic mice have, however, failed to repro­duce these studies. The overall current view is that whilst SMPCs can make signicant contributions to atherosclerosis and restenosis, these cells are from local tissue sources and not from a bone marrow-derived source.
V. Nankivell et al.
6.3 Restenosis
Restenosis is the re-narrowing of the arterial lumen. It is induced by vascular injury that causes an inammatory-driven VSMC hyperproliferation and overproduction of ECM proteins resulting in excessive neointimal hyperplasia.
6.3.1 Causes andMechanisms ofRestenosis
Percutaneous angioplasty with or without stent deployment is the major mode used to re-open arteries blocked by atherosclerosis. Both cause signicant damage to the vessel wall which can result in the expansion of the neointima due to the uncon­trolled proliferation of medial SMCs. A combination of important factors including thrombosis, intimal hyperplasia, re-endothelialisation and remodelling contribute to the development of restenosis. There have, however, been signicant transforma­tive improvements in the design of current generation drug-eluting stents (DES) that have reduced the rates of stent-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). These MACE include: stent restenosis, stent thrombosis and end- organ infarction.
The initial insult caused by the expansion of an angioplasty balloon catheter (with or without stent deployment) severely damages the endothelial layer and initi­ates inammatory events. This causes a signicant impact on the endothelial cells resulting in injury or complete removal of the endothelial cell layer at the site. In addition, after injury, medial VSMC apoptosis occurs (e.g. balloon injury causes up
6 Vascular Biology ofSmooth Muscle Cells andRestenosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
127
to 70% mortality of SMCs within 30min [31]). This injury initiates a cascade of pro-inammatory events which stimulate VSMCs to de-differentiate to a more pro­liferative and synthetic phenotype which promotes increased re-entry into the cell cycle, thereby increasing proliferation and migration. VSMC proliferation increases dramatically in the rst few days following injury leading to the rapid expansion of a neointima which is SMC-rich. After 4–6weeks, re-endothelisation of the injured site occurs, however, there is evidence to show that these cells are dysfunctional and have decreased vascular integrity and increased permeability [32]. At 8weeks post injury, the proliferation of the VSMCs returns to normal levels. There may, how­ever, still be areas that have not undergone sufcient re-endothelialisation in which low levels of VSMC proliferation continue. Endothelial cells play an important role in regulating SMC proliferation and migration. In vivo studies have found that areas of early re-endothelialisation had less neointimal growth after vessel injury than those areas with low re-endothelialisation [33]. In an attempt to increase endotheli­alisation and decrease neointimal hyperplasia after stent deployment, stents coated with VEGF have been tested in rabbits. However, after 28days the stents failed to increase re-endothelialisation and reduce neointimal hyperplasia. This indicates that local delivery of VEGF is not a viable strategy [34].
6.3.1.1 Mechanisms ofInammation-Driven Neointimal Hyperplasia
The inammatory response that causes neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis fol­lowing vascular injury has not been fully elucidated. The degree of inammation induced by stent deployment or angioplasty has been associated with the extent of restenosis as well as the prevalence of macrophages in the initial lesion. Leukocytes can be recruited to the site of vascular injury which is initiated by binding to plate­lets and cell adhesion molecules (e.g. ICAM-1 and V-CAM-1). Following injury to the endothelium there is a release of a host of cytokines including TGF-β1, PDGF and broblast growth factor (FGF) 2, TNF-α, VEGF, macrophage colony stimulat­ing factor (MCSF), IL-4, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-8 and CCL2. The release of these cyto­kines induces the subsequent proliferation and migration of medial VSMCs into the intima, resulting in expansion of a now SMC rich neointima.
There is also a growing body of evidence that inammatory chemokines are critically important in the promotion of neointimal hyperplasia and vascular repair processes. In vitro, incubation with a range of chemokines (CCL2, CCL5 and CX3CL1) increases VSMC proliferation [
3537]. The transcription factor,
NF-κB, the driver of inammatory processes and chemokine expression, has been implicated in this process [37]. The involvement of chemokines in neointimal development has been supported in an in vivo study that showed deletion of CCL2 reduced neointimal formation in a murine model of arterial injury [38]. Furthermore, deletion of TNF- α, a cytokine that stimulates inammation and NF-κB, was found to prevent neointimal hyperplasia in a murine model of carotid artery injury [39].
128
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Nankivell et al.
6.3.1.2 Growth Factors
PDGF is one of the key SMC mitogens that stimulates the growth of SMCs during vessel repair. However, when present at excessively high levels, such as the case following angioplasty-induced vascular injury, it can strongly stimulate prolifera­tion and cause neointimal hyperplasia [40]. FGF2 also stimulates medial SMC proliferation and migration to the intima of injured vessels. Interestingly, FGF2 will not stimulate the proliferation of intimal SMCs as the intimal hyperplastic response is normal in FGF2 knockout mice. FGF2 is, however, also important in remodelling following angioplasty as FGF2 knockout mice display decreased SMC contractility [41]. One study has also identied a role for IL-11in neointi­mal hyperplasia. IL-11 is an anti-inammatory growth factor known to inhibit NF-κB. In vitro studies have demonstrated that incubation with IL-11 causes dose-dependent decreases in bFGF- induced VSMC proliferation as well as a reduction in pro-inammation cytokine expression from VSMCs including IL-8 and IL-6 [42].
6.3.1.3 Extracellular Matrix (ECM)
The pro-inammatory environment that promotes the proliferation and migration of VSMCs also results in the release of extracellular matrix proteins that contribute to intimal expansion. ECM contributes to restenosis in the later stages post- angioplasty. Histological analysis of human samples has revealed that in tissues with advanced restenosis, there is a lower cell density surrounded by substantial amounts of ECM.The ECM proteins induced by angioplasty include type I collagen, as well as the proteoglycans versican, perlecan, biglycan and hyaluronan, without the decorin that is present in primary plaques [43]. Some forms of ECM can stimulate SMC proliferation, whilst other types prevent further ECM accumulation and deposi­tion [44].
6.3.1.4 Percutaneous Arterial Interventions That Cause Restenosis
andTheir Evolution
Whilst balloon angioplasty can be successful in restoring arterial luminal patency, the procedure is not without its limitations. Vessels have a high likelihood of re­narrowing due to the elasticity of the lamina, and any damage to the vessel caused by the balloon is found to trigger restenosis [45]. Many approaches have been tri­alled in an effort to reduce both vessel recoil and restenosis. These include drug strategies such as anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents and growth factor inhibi­tors, in addition to mechanical strategies including rotational cutting devices and lasers mounted on catheters [46]. Stents, however, have proven to be very successful in reducing vessel re-narrowing after angioplasty. Due to the sustained mechanical support provided to the vessel by the stent, it eliminates vascular recoil which occurs
6 Vascular Biology ofSmooth Muscle Cells andRestenosis
https://t.me/medicina_free
once the balloon catheter has been removed. Over the past 50years stent design, metal composition, coating and strut diameter have been extensively modied to optimise the effectiveness of stents. Two main classes of stent have dominated, the bare metal stent (BMS) and the drug eluting stent (DES). Whilst BMS are still rou­tinely used, particularly for peripheral arterial disease, it is the DES which are pre­dominantly used for coronary artery disease.
6.3.1.5 Bare Metal Stents (BMS)
Whilst BMS deployment reduces vessel recoil and increases vessel lumen area (par­ticularly when a sub-optimal angioplasty result is obtained), acute stent thrombosis is a major complication following BMS deployment. Stent thrombosis after BMS deployment most commonly occurs within the rst month, particularly in coronary intervention, with the risk decreasing after re-endothelialisation [47].
To prevent acute thrombus formation, patients are prescribed dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) for a period of time and then single antiplatelet therapy to reduce acute stent thrombosis following intervention. DAPTs combine aspirin with a P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g. Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine) and have proven to be the most effective regime to decrease coronary stent thrombosis, reducing incidence to 1%. The Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study (STARS) showed that the incidence of death, target lesion revascularisation, vessel thrombosis or MI after 30 days was
3.6% for patients treated alone with aspirin, however, this was signicantly reduced to 0.5% with DAPT (aspirin+ticlopidine) [48].
While DAPTs are necessary to reduce thrombosis risk, they are not without their limitations. It is estimated that approximately 4–8% of patients require non-cardiac surgery within the rst year after stent deployment [49]. Patients relying on DAPT to reduce their thrombotic risk are faced with the dilemma of continuing DAPT and risking both minor and major bleeding during surgery and post-operatively. Alternatively, patients can stop one or both antiplatelet agents, which increases their risk of a thrombotic event and is dependent on the length of time post-intervention. Despite antiplatelet therapy, BMS still fail as a result of restenosis or thrombosis.
129
6.3.2 Strategies toReduce Neointimal Hyperplasia
Initial studies aimed at reducing neointimal hyperplasia following arterial interven­tion focused on the systemic delivery of anti-proliferative drugs to reduce SMC proliferation. One study investigated whether the anti-proliferative drug Tranilast could reduce restenosis rates after BMS deployment. Initial animal studies found that the agent was effective in reducing restenosis rates in rabbits and pigs [50, 51]. Furthermore, when Tranilast was studied in a small clinical trial, a modest reduction in restenosis rates were seen. However, once the drug moved into a large randomised clinical trial (Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes-PRESTO)
130
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Nankivell et al.
there was no signicant difference in restenosis formation between Tranilast and the placebo group [52]. Similar outcomes have been seen with other systemic anti­proliferative drugs trialled to reduce neointimal hyperplasia.
The main reason cited for the failure of larger clinical trials with systemic anti­proliferative therapy was the inadequate level of the drug at the angioplasty site. As a result, local drug delivery using perfusion balloons was explored. This method also failed due to the poor uptake of drugs at the site of ination due to the minimal vessel contact time. Efforts then turned to investigate the potential of drug-eluting stents (i.e. anti-proliferative drugs released from stents) to reduce restenosis.
6.3.2.1 Drug Eluting Stents
Drug eluting stents (DES) were designed to deliver a sustained dose of anti­proliferative drugs to the local area and aimed to overcome the issue of restenosis experienced in BMS.The stents were coated with a polymer such as phosphoryl choline silicon carbide which allowed an anti-proliferative drug such as Sirolimus or Paclitaxel to be coated on and slowly released into the surrounding tissue [53].
Early randomised clinical trials showed promising results, with the rst­generation DES causing a reduction in SMC proliferation and restenosis rates post- implantation at both 6 and 12months-post deployment, compared to BMS [54]. Initial clinical testing of this rst DES in 2003 used the CYPHER™ stent (Johnson and Johnson), which was coated with the drug Sirolimus. This was closely followed with TAXUS™ (Boston Scientic) which used Paclitaxel. Both Sirolimus and Paclitaxel work via inhibition of the cell cycle, however, each drug does this by a different mode of action. Sirolimus works by halting cell division in the initial phase (G-phase) of the cell cycle. In contrast, Paclitaxel arrests cells during the mitosis phase when they are about to divide. While CYPHER and TAXUS DES reduced restenosis rates when compared to BMS, a new complication of delayed healing and re-endothelialisation at the deploy­ment site arose.
First-generation DES are prone to late (30days–1year) and very late (>1year) stent thrombosis as a result of delayed healing, likely caused by the anti-
proliferative agents released at the stent site. DAPT therapies for BMS were initially recom­mended for the 4–6-week period following stent deployment, but for DES this was increased to 12-months in an effort to reduce complications associated with late stent thrombosis [55].
Due to the necessity for a prolonged use of DAPTs, some patients experience mild to severe side effects from the medications. For example, continued use of aspirin can cause gastrointestinal upset and tinnitus. However, prolonged used of DAPT appears to be essential following coronary DES deployment. Clinical studies have found that stent thrombosis is signicantly elevated following the cessation of DAPT at 12-months. Furthermore, the incidence of late stent thrombosis continues to rise at a rate of 0.6% per year in the following 3years post-procedure resulting in a high mortality rate of 25% [56]. First generation DES therefore exacerbated the