Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5366_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
02.09.2026
Размер:
21 Мб
Скачать
140
R. Pranomphon etal.
complex N-glycans that occur as nal glycan products. Biosynthesis of hybrid and complex N-glycans begins in the medial-Golgi with the action of an N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (GnT-1 or mgat1), which adds a GlcNAc to Man5GlcNAc2 [34]. The majority of N-glycans are then trimmed by Golgi α-mannosidase II, removing two mannoses (Man) from GlcNAcMan5GlcNAc2 to yield GlcNAcMan3GlcNAc2. Hybrid N-glycans result when a structure such as GlcNAcMan3GlcNAc2 undergoes no further extension or trimming to remove exposed mannose residues, resulting in structures with one or two terminal man­nose residues. In addition, another GlcNAc can be added to the innermost Man group by the enzyme β1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III or mgat3) in the medial Golgi, resulting in bisecting GlcNAc structures, which can also alter the capacity for other downstream enzymes to act on the glycan structure. Next, the enzyme β-1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase II (GnT-II or mgat2) adds a GlcNAc to the GlcNAcMan3GlcNAc2 structure to generate the glycan product GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2, which is the precursor for all multiantennary complex N-glycans. Tri- and tetra-antennary branches can be achieved by adding GlcNAc at the α(1,3)-mannose site by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase IV (GnT-IV or mgat 4) and/or at the α(1,6)-mannose site by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GnT-V or mgat 5). Additional modications of complex and hybrid N-glycans can occur in the trans-Golgi including the addition of core α(1,6)-fucose (Fuc) to the GlcNAc adjacent to Asn at the N-glycan sites by α-(1,6)-fucosyltransferase and branch elon­gation by the addition of a β-linked galactose residue to GlcNAc by galactosyltrans­ferase to produce Galβ1-4GlcNAc, or poly-acetyllactosamine (poly-LacNAc) sequences. Finally, these terminal Gal residues can serve as acceptors for several sialyltransferases, leading to even more complexity.
6.2.2 O-Linked Glycosylation
O-linked glycosylation occurs in either the ER or Golgi apparatus of animal cells. O-glycosylation begins with the attachment of a single monosaccharide
(N-acetylgalactosamine, GalNAc) onto the hydroxyl group of the amino acids Ser or Thr on the polypeptide [35]. As O-glycosylation lacks consensus sequences, gly­cosylated Ser/Thr residues are often located in the “proline-glutamate-serine­threonine (PEST)” region of the protein [36]. This processing step is further modied by the addition of other monosaccharides including GlcNAc, GalNAc, sialic acid, fucose, galactose, xylose, and/or polylactosamine [14, 35]. O-glycosylation does not share a common core structure; it is believed to be primar­ily involved in protein stability and degradation [36].
6 Metabolic and Process Engineering to Control Glycan Structures…
141
6.2.3 Glycosaminoglycan Synthesis
Glycosaminoglycans are generally synthesized as proteoglycans attached to core proteins such as serglycin, syndecan, and glypican. Biosynthesis occurs in the ER or Golgi apparatus. GAGs are attached to the core proteins through a β-linkage between xylose and either serine or threonine on the core protein. GAGs are long (up to ~1Mda) linear chains of repeating disaccharide units, consisting of either GlcNAc or GalNAc alternating with glucuronic acid and/or iduronic acid or Gal. Extensive chain modications including N-deacetylation and N-sulfonation, O-sulfonations, and epimerization then occur under the actions of specic enzymes, many of which have a variety of isozymes whose expression is cell-type dependent.
6.3 Effects ofGlycosylation onBiological Activity
The importance of glycosylation and the question of how glycosylation patterns affect different properties of recombinant proteins have attracted much attention over the last decade. For potential therapeutic use, large, complex proteins need to have human-like posttranslational modications to be functional and nonimmuno­genic. Proper glycosylation proles promote biological activity and stability, increase half-life, and reduce the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics [37, 38]. Obtaining a consistent glycoform prole in production is desired due to regulatory concerns because a molecule can be dened, in part, by its carbohydrate structures. An optimal prole may involve a spectrum of product glycans that confers a desired therapeutic efcacy, or a homogeneous glycoform prole that can be systemically monitored [1]. As monoclonal antibodies have dominated protein therapeutics, much work has focused on glycosylation effects on mAbs, though certainly other proteins, particularly those containing sialic acids can be substantially affected. N-linked glycosylation is the most prevalent glycan form seen in recombinant mAbs, and IgG antibodies contain one conserved glycosylation site on each of the two Asn–297in the constant heavy 2 (CH2) domains. This site has gained recent importance as it has been demonstrated that the Fc domain of the IgG can be engi­neered for improved functionality [39].
6.3.1 Mannosylation
In general, human IgG contains low levels (<5%) of high mannose (HM) glyco­forms (Man5-9) [5, 40]. The HM glycans increase antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), which is likely due to the lack of core fucose, but signicantly increase serum clearance, thereby impacting the therapeutic antibody efcacy [4143]. For this reason, antibodies with HM glycans must be controlled. Cell type and cell culture parameters modulate the level of high mannose glycans [44].
142
R. Pranomphon etal.
6.3.2 Fucosylation
Fucosylation involves the addition of fucose from GDP-Fuc to the GlcNAc residue of Fc oligosaccharides via an α1,6-linkage catalyzed by fucosyltransferase 8 (fut8) [45]. Almost all therapeutic antibodies produced in CHO cells, mouse myeloma NS0, and SP2/0 are fucosylated [46, 47]. Removal of the core fucose residue from Fc oligosaccharides enhances ADCC by improving the binding afnity of the IgG Fc domain to Fcγ receptor IIIa [4850]. For example, non-fucosylated therapeutic antibodies show up to 100-fold increased ADCC [51].
6.3.3 Galactosylation
Galactosylation involves the addition of Gal residues from UDP-Gal to the nonre­ducing terminal of the Man α1-3 and Man α1-6 arms of the bi-antennary core gly­can structure [52, 53]. Terminal Gal residues of Fc glycans affect complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [54, 55], protein folding, stability, and aggregation [56, 57].
6.3.4 Sialylation
Terminal sialic acids in N-linked complex glycans play a major role in the circula­tory half-life of glycoproteins as sialic acid masks the penultimate sugar, Gal, and prevents recognition and uptake of the glycoprotein by asialoglycoprotein receptors (ASGPR) on hepatocytes, resulting in a longer serum half-life of the therapeutic protein [5860].
A variety of factors, both extrinsic and intrinsic, limit our abilities to produce the desired glycans in cultured mammalian cells. A summary of commonly understood cellular bottlenecks inuencing glycosylation in CHO cells is illustrated in Fig.6.2. The remaining sections in the chapter address strategies to overcome these limita­tions, including choice of host cell line, glycoengineering, and bioprocess optimization.
6.4 Choice ofHost Cell Line
While CHO cell lines are the dominant mammalian cell host for producing thera­peutic proteins, other rodent and human cell lines have been employed, with varying success at obtaining desired glycan proles. Enzymatic differences between different host cell types and the implications are shown in Table6.1 (adapted from
6 Metabolic and Process Engineering to Control Glycan Structures…
Fig. 6.2 Various experimentally observed bottlenecks in the glycosylation pathway in cells. (Adapted from [61] with permission from Springer-Nature)
143
[62, 63]). In addition, different CHO cell hosts (e.g., CHO-K1, CHO DG44) exhibit different glycosylation patterns, an important consideration when developing a bio­similar product in a different host cell line.
Goh and Ng [63] provided a detailed comparison of the glycosylation proles of four recombinant glycoproteins: immunoglobulin G (IgG), coagulation factor VII (FVII), erythropoietin (EPO) and alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) produced from differ­ent sources including human urinary- or plasma-derived proteins, different CHO cell hosts, NS0 and J558L murine myeloma cells, baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells, and the human cell lines HEK293/T (human embryonic kidney with or with­out Epstein Barr transformation), PER.C6 (retinoblastoma), HT-1080 (brosar­coma), and AGE1.HN (human neural tissue derived). They noted that for IgG the NS0-derived structures had signicantly lower galactose levels than the plasma- or CHO-derived structures, with increased high mannose structures in the NS0-derived IgG.Interestingly, while terminal sialylation was under 5% on IgG derived from human plasma, CHO-K1, J558L, and HEK293 cells, 11.8% of glycans on IgG pro­duced in NS0 cells were sialylated. For coagulation factor VII (FVII), which has two N glycosylation sites, N145 and N322, glycans on plasma-derived FVII were predominantly complex-type bi- and tri-antennary structures without core fucosyl­ation. CHO- and BHK-derived FVII showed primarily complex-type biantennary di-sialylated core-fucosylated structures, while HEK293-derived FVII demon­strated the most heterogeneous N-linked glycans with about 20 different glycostruc­tures. Native EPO is N-glycosylated at sites N24, N38, and N83 and is primarily
144
Table 6.1 Enzymatic differences between host species
Glycosylation enzyme Function
β-1,4N-acetylglucosaminyl- transferase III (GnT- III)
α1,3/4 fucosyltransferase Catalyzes the transfer of
α1,3 galactosyltransferase (α1,3-GT)
β-galactoside α2,6­sialyltransferase (Gal α2,6-ST)
CMP-Neu5Ac hydroxylase (CMAH)
Catalyzes the transfer of GlcNAc from UDP­GlcNAc to a core-β-Man of an N-glycan via β1,4-linkage to form a bisecting GlcNAc residue
L-fucose from GDP-Fuc to N-acetyllactosamine, generating Lewisx, sialyl Lewisx structures and their combinations
Catalyzes the transfer of Gal onto terminal lactosaminide residues via an α1,3 linkage, to synthesize a Gal-α 1,3-Gal group (alpha-Gal)
Attaches sialic acid with an alpha-2,6 linkage onto Gal or GalNAc residues
Catalyzes the conversion of the precursor molecule CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) to CMP-N- glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc)
Expression in mammalian cells
Expressed in human cells; absent in CHO cells
Expressed in human cells; absent in CHO cells
Inactive in human and CHO cells; functional in BHK and murine cells
Expressed in human and murine cells; absent in CHO and BHK cells
Inactive in humans; functional in animal cells
R. Pranomphon etal.
Impact on recombinant proteins
Absence of bisecting GlcNAc in CHO derived proteins, leading to reduced biological activity of mAbs
May perturb proper biodistribution and pharmacokinetics
Possibility of immunogenic glycoforms in BHK- and murine­derived proteins
Undersialylation, reduced serum half-life of CHO­and BHK-derived proteins
Presence of immunogenic form of sialic acid particularly in murine-derived proteins
decorated with tetra-antennary complex-type glycostructures. Recombinant EPO expressed in BHK-21, CHO, and HT-1080 cells demonstrated predominantly tetra­antennary structures for ~60–80% of the total glycoforms observed. The structures were largely sialylated in both the native and recombinant forms although the frac­tion of antennae that were sialylated varied between host cells, leading to charge variation in the proteins depending on host. Alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) has three main N-linked glycosylation sites at positions N46, N83, and N247. In the native A1AT, the glycans are typically disialylated biantennary complex-type structures. The predominant glycan in CHO-derived, recombinant A1AT was also a disi­alylated, complex-type biantennary structure but with a lower fraction of 47.9% compared with the 74–77% found in two plasma studies. Studies in human cell lines
6 Metabolic and Process Engineering to Control Glycan Structures…
145
AGE1.HN, HEK293, HEK293T, and PER.C6 also observed that the predominant glycan in recombinant A1AT was a biantennary complex-type structure; however, the terminal sialylation on the predominant glycan in the AGE1.HN, HEK293, and HEK293T cell lines was signicantly lower than in the native or CHO-derived gly­cans. In addition, while minimal fucosylation was observed in the plasma-derived A1AT, recombinant A1AT produced in CHO and human cell lines predominantly contained core α(1,6) fucose and to a certain degree, Lewisx fucose.
Even among different host CHO cell lines (e.g., CHO-K1 and CHO DG44) and individual clones derived from the same host, different glycosylation patterns occur. Yeo and colleagues compared the glycan proles for a recombinant mAb produced in CHO-K1 and CHO DG44 cell lines [64]. The mAb produced in CHO-K1 cells had predominantly G0F glycans (~60%) with approximately 25% G1F glycans and a much smaller fraction of G2F glycans. In contrast, the DG44-derived mAbs had a much lower fraction of G0F glycans (typically 20–30%) with 40–50% G1F glycans and ~20% G2F glycans. In both cell lines, the fraction of sialylated and high man­nose glycans was relatively small, but it was signicantly greater in the DG44­derived mAbs than in the mAb produced in CHO-K1. A similar study was performed by Könitzer and coworkers at Boehringer Ingelheim in which they compared mAbs produced in two DG44-derived cell lines and one CHO-K1-derived cell line. In addition to comparing the glycan patterns, they performed RNA-Seq to compare the gene expression patterns between the different host cell lines. The CHO-K1-derived cell line produced a higher fraction of nonfucosylated antibodies compared to either of the DG44 cell lines. When looking at high mannose sugar structures, antibodies produced in DG44 cell line 2 demonstrated the lowest amount (median: 3.7%; range: 0.1–35.0%), followed by DG44 cell line 1 (median: 7.9%; range: 1.1–37.0%) and the CHO-K1 cell line (median: 9.7%; range:1.7–24.4%). Terminal sialylation was also increased in DG44 cell line 2 compared to the other two cell lines. Lastly, antibody galactosylation was consistently lower in the DG44 cell line 1 and CHO­K1 cell line than in DG44 cell line 2. In general, the glycan proles from DG44 cell line 1 and the CHO-K1 cell line show more similarity to each other than to DG44 cell line 2. Using RNA-Seq, they compared the transcriptome of the three cell lines and identied 188 glycosylation-related genes that were expressed in all 3 lines, 4 genes that were unique to the CHO-K1 cell line, 8 genes that were only expressed in the DG44 cell lines, and 2 genes expressed uniquely in either of the 2 DG44 cell lines. They further characterized relative expression levels of several key enzymes and noted that expression of a recombinant mAb led to differential expression of several glycosylation-related genes.
For production of recombinant or bioengineered glycosaminoglycans such as heparin, the choice of host cell lines appears even more critical. Baik and coworkers attempted to produce a bioengineered heparin in CHO cells by engineering the GAG biosynthesis pathways [65]. They overexpressed two critical enzymes in the pathway, NDST2, which removes the acetyl group from GlcNAc replacing it with a sulfate group, and 3OST, which sulfonates the critical 3-hydroxyl position on
146
GlcNAc responsible for anticoagulant activity. While they were able to dramatically increase sulfation and signicantly increase anticoagulant activity, the resulting product was very different from pharmaceutical heparin both in terms of structure and anticoagulant activity. In contrast, Thacker and colleagues performed similar metabolic engineering manipulations on murine mastocytoma cells (a tumorigenic form of mast cells, which are the source of heparin in vivo). They were able to obtain heparin-like GAGs with an anticoagulant potency that exceeds porcine­derived heparin [66].
R. Pranomphon etal.

6.5 Glycoengineering

Genetic approaches for enhancing N-glycosylation are the most common strategies and employ gene editing or transient expression techniques to change the activity of glycosyltransferases and increase or decrease the precursors involved in the N-glycosylation process. Genetic approaches altering heterogeneity, sialylation, fucosylation, and branching in N-glycan structures are described below and shown in Fig.6.3.
6.5.1 Manipulating Heterogeneity
Although glycoprotein biologics produced by CHO cells containing heterogeneous mixtures of N-glycans are considered safe as human therapeutics, excess heteroge­neity can be an issue. This excess heterogeneity arises due to the variability of N-glycan processing and can compromise the safety and activity of such glyco­therapeutics. Having homogenous glycoforms allows comparative studies of their biological effects, which can be advantageous in the development of therapeutic candidates [67]. Yang etal. showed that CHO cells can be genetically engineered to produce glycoproteins in a nearly homogenous form without any deleterious effect on their growth or other compensatory changes [68]. To achieve this goal, the invivo function of each of the 19 glycosyltransferases potentially participating in N-glycan formation and processing was determined in CHO cells by individual and/or mul­tiple glycosyltransferase gene knockouts. The effects of knocking out each of the 19 genes involved in N-glycan branching (mgat1/2/3/4A/4B/4C/5/5B), galactosylation (B4galt1/2/3/4), N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) elongation (B3gnt1/2/8), terminal capping by sialylation (st3gal3/4/6), and core α-6-fucosylation (fut8) were deter­mined using a stably expressed model protein, a recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) containing in its structure three N-glycans with heterogeneous tetra­antennary structures, low poly-LacNAc and terminal α-2,3-linked sialic acid.
G
a
l
a
c
t
o
s
y
l
a
t
i
o
n
F
u
c
o
s
y
l
.
.
.
.
P
o
l
y
L
a
c
N
A
c
S
i
a
l
y
l
a
t
i
o
n
B
r
a
n
c
h
i
n
g
6 Metabolic and Process Engineering to Control Glycan Structures…
147
Eliminates b4-branched tetra-antennary N-glycans
Eliminates a-2,3 linked sialic acids
Eliminates a-2,3 linked sialic acids
( bi-antennary N-glycans but
with increased poly-LacNAc)
 

Eliminates poly-LacNAc

Increases tri-antennary N-glycans
over bi-antennary forms
Increases tetra-antennary N-
a-glycans over bi-antennary forms

Adds α-2,6 linked sialic acids Eliminates a-2,3 linked sialic acids

Increases a-2,3 linked sialic acids
23supression
 
o
n
k
c
e
n
e
N-glycosylation genes
o
v
e
r
r
e
p
x
y
l
a
t
i
o
n
 
CMP-SAT gene, mutant GNE gene & 

k
o
u
t

  


o
i
s
s
e
s
i
B
B
G
r
a
n
c
h
i
n

polyLacNAc
extension
e
Asn
n
e
k
n
o
g
c
k
-
i
S

knockout of

CMP-SAT gene, CMP-SAS gene & 
G
n
,
i
a
l
Increases a-2,3 linked sialic acids
Eliminates b6-branched tetra-antennary N-glycans
Eliminates galactose (>90%)
Eliminates immunoreactivity for LacNAc in cells containing knockout
of 


Eliminates fucose
a
t
i
o
n
n
o

i
t
e
t
a
i
r
s
e
t
l
a
a
r
,
t
n
x

E
,
n
o
i
t
c
Increases complex
e
bisected glycans
Introduces additional N-glycan attachment sites in the protein
Gene alteraton
Increases galactose Adds & increases a-2,6 linked sialic acids & monosialylation

Adds & increases a-2,6 linked sialic acids. Increases branching
Increases a-2,3 linked sialic acids


Bisects N-glycans
Fig. 6.3 Summary of genetic approaches for manipulating glycosylation in CHO cells described in this chapter. Gene knockouts are represented by yellow segments and gene knock-ins, overex­pression and alteration are represented by green segments. For convenience, tetra-antennary N-glycans and genes participating in N-glycosylation are also shown
6.5.2 Manipulating Sialylation
Sialylation refers to the glycosidic addition of a negatively charged monosaccha­ride, a sialic acid, by sialyltransferases, generally to terminal Gal or GalNAc, though occasionally to GlcNAc or sialic acid itself in complex N-glycans [69]. CHO cells
148
R. Pranomphon etal.
contain α-2,3-sialyltransferases (α-2,3-SiaT), whereas human cells have α-2,6-SiaT in addition to α-2,3-SiaT [70, 71]. Due to this difference, N-glycans produced by CHO cells only contain sialic acid residues linked by α-2,3-glycosidic linkages, whereas human glycans contain both α-2,3- and α-2,6-linked sialic acid residues [72]. Sialic acid at the termini in complex N-glycans masks terminal Gal from rec­ognition by hepatocyte asialoglycoprotein receptors that lead to rapid clearance from the circulation [73]. Insufcient or lack of sialylation in glycoprotein biologics can lead to inconsistency in the pharmacodynamics and cause challenges in formu­lating reproducible dosages. Thus, correct and generally, maximal sialylation is nec­essary to ensure longer plasma half-lives and maximum in vivo activity and therapeutic efcacy [74].
Of the numerous (>50) sialic acids occurring in nature, N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) is the most abundant [69]. Its derivative, N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), is also a major sialic acid found on mammalian cell surfaces, formed by Neu5Ac hydroxylation by cytidine monophosphate (CMP)-Neu5Ac hydroxylase. Humans lack CMP-Neu5Ac hydroxylase and are unable to synthesize Neu5Gc. Glycoproteins synthesized by CHO cells occasionally contain N-glycans capped with Neu5Gc. Neu5Gc in glycans can be a cause for concern as Neu5Gc-capped glycans act as “xeno-autoantigens” in humans and are a cause of “xenosialitis,” an inammatory process initiated by binding of naturally occurring antibodies against Neu5Gc in the human body [7577]. The Neu5Gc-dependent antigenicity of glyco­proteins obtained from CHO cells depends on the amount and locations of Neu5Gc in the glycan structure. For example, mAbs and rhEPO produced by CHO cells containing 1–2% Neu5Gc did not elicit an immune response, whereas, in the same study, fetuin with high levels of Neu5Gc (7% of total sialic acid residues) elicited an immune response in chickens [78]. A recent study by Yu etal. on different clinical mAbs containing Neu5Gc residues concluded that mAbs containing a single Neu5Gc residue do not bind to anti-Neu5Gc antibodies, while only a minor fraction of mAbs containing two or more Neu5Gc showed binding to anti-Neu5Gc antibod­ies [79]. Further, this study suggested that the binding of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies to mAbs containing multiple Neu5Gc depends on Neu5Gc location in the mAb struc­ture. A recent study has implicated a newly discovered miRNA, cgr-miR-111, in controlling the expression of CMP-Neu5Ac hydroxylase, suggesting another strat­egy for control of Neu5Gc on recombinant proteins produced in CHO cells [80].
6.5.2.1 Increasing α-2,6 Sialylation
Glycoprotein biologics that contain α-2,6-linked sialic acid residues are suggested to be more “human-like” and perform better invivo [81, 82]. In two recent studies, chemo-enzymatic modication (in vitro glycosylation) of two IgGs (anti-Her2 anti­body and rituximab) creating homogenous glycans containing α-2,6-sialic acid resi­dues enhanced ADCC due to stronger interaction of α-2,6-sialylated glycans with FcγRIIIa receptors on natural killer cells [81, 83]. Similarly, in two previous studies involving in vitro glycosylation, α-2,6-sialylated versions of IgGs produced
6 Metabolic and Process Engineering to Control Glycan Structures…
149
superior anti-inammatory responses compared to asialylated or α-2,3-sialylated versions [82, 84].
CHO cells were successfully engineered to produce rhEPO containing almost exclusively α-2,6-sialylation by knockout of st3gal4/6 genes (encoding α-2,3­SiaTs) and knock-in of st6gal-I gene (encoding an α-2,6-SiaT) [68]. Furthermore, in the same study, homogeneous bi-antennary N-glycans capped by α-2,6-NeuA were produced by additional knockout of mgat4A/4B/5 genes.
6.5.2.2 Increasing theSialic Acid Content
Besides knockout and knock-in of sialyltransferase genes, increases in sialic acid content can be obtained by overexpressing genes participating in steps prior to sialylation or inhibiting genes encoding for sialidases that remove the sialic acid after the sialylation step. The addition of sialic acid residues to a growing N-glycan chain can be limited by the absence of Gal, which acts as an acceptor substrate for sialyltransferases. Increasing the Gal content in N-glycans by overexpressing GalT produces a corresponding increase in the sialic acid content in CHO cells overex­pressing sialyltransferase enzymes. Raymond etal. transiently coexpressed genes encoding for GalT, α-2,6-SiaT, and an IgG1 antibody (trastuzumab/Herceptin®) and produced efcient α-2,6-sialylation in trastuzumab’s Fc region. The glycans under investigation were monosialylated, a physiologically relevant form found in circu­lating human IgGs. Over 85% of sialic acids on trastuzumab showed α-2,6- sialylation due to overexpression of human GalT, which inserts Gal residues in the glycan that are preferentially used by α-2,6-SiaT rather than α-2,3- SiaT. Overexpression of GalT alone increased the Gal content of the Fc glycans, but had no effect on increas­ing the sialylation, whereas overexpression of α-2,6-SiaT only increased the sialylation moderately [85]. In a similar study, coexpression of GalT was benecial in CHO cells overexpressing α-2,3-SiaT to increase the sialylation. Trisialylated glycans on rhEPO increased from 17.3 to 35.5% when expressed in CHO EC1 cells co-overexpressing both human α-2,3-SiaT and GalT [86].
Sialic acid content can also be enhanced by increasing the concentration and availability of the donor sugar nucleotide CMP-sialic acid (CMP-SA) present in the Golgi apparatus. Inside the nucleus, CMP-SA is generated from sialic acid by CMP sialic acid synthetase (CMP-SAS) and later transported to the Golgi by CMP-sialic acid transporter (CMP-SAT). In eukaryotes, sialic acid is synthesized in the cyto­plasm by three enzymes in a four-step process. The two rst steps are catalyzed by a bifunctional enzyme, GNE (UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-2-epimerase/N- ­acetylmannosaminekinase), having kinase and epimerase activity. The epimerase activity of GNE converts UDP-GlcNAc to N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc), which is then converted to ManNAc-6-phosphate by the kinase activity of GNE.The last two steps are catalyzed by two enzymes, Neu5Ac-9-phosphate synthase and Neu5Ac-9-phosphate phosphatase, which produce Neu5Ac from ManNAc-6­phosphate by condensation and dephosphorylation reactions, respectively. GNE is a rate-limiting enzyme for the synthesis of sialic acid in the cytoplasm [71, 87].