Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5809_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
24 Мб
Скачать
366
J. Miravet-Valenciano et al.
28. Moreno I, Cicinelli E, Garcia-Grau I, Gonzalez­Monfort M, Bau D, Vilella F, etal. The diagnosis of chronic endometritis in infertile asymptomatic women: a comparative study of histology, micro­bial cultures, hysteroscopy, and molecular micro­biology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(6):602. e1–602.e16.
List of Relevant Websites
E-tegrity: http://www.etegritytest.com/ EFT®: http://klimanlabs.yale.edu/infertility/eft/ ERA: https://www.igenomix.com/tests/
endometrial-receptivity-test-era/
Part VII
Ultrasound and Pregnancy

Early Pregnancy Ultrasound

LauraDetti
23

Introduction

Early pregnancy ultrasound is performed to assess the location of a pregnancy (intrauterine or extrauterine) and its viability. It also appraises the number of embryos and their chorionicity and amnionicity and often is instrumental in predict­ing the development, and dictates the manage­ment, of a pregnancy in the second and third trimester. Among the main objectives of the early pregnancy ultrasound are correct dating, evalua­tion of early pregnancy landmarks and placental location, and distinguishing normal from abnor­mal pregnancy. In addition, rst trimester ultra­sound allows evaluation of the ovaries and the corpus luteum.
Temporally, the rst structure to be appreci­ated by ultrasound is the gestational sac, followed by the yolk sac, the embryo, and, when present, the embryonal cardiac activity. There is general consensus that the best technique to assess the early pregnancy is by transvaginal ultrasound: the higher resolution and the closer proximity of the transvaginal transducer allow the identica­tion of structures such as a 2-mm gestational sac, or a 1-mm yolk sac, in addition to allowing excel­lent anatomical details of the embryo. In this
L. Detti (*) University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memphis, TN, USA e-mail: ldetti@uthsc.edu
chapter we will describe the evaluation of the rst trimester singleton and multiple pregnancy using the transvaginal ultrasound technique.

Pregnancy Location

It is of foremost importance to locate a pregnancy in a woman with a positive pregnancy test. An intrauterine pregnancy can be identied with a β-hCG level as low as 1500mIU/ml, depending on the ultrasound machine capabilities. A conser­vative discriminatory β-hCG level of 3000mIU/ ml has been set forth by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and the Society of Radiologists in 2012 [1]. Based on these societ­ies’ panel, presumptive treatment for ectopic pregnancy with the use of methotrexate or other pharmacologic or surgical means should be undertaken only if a single β-hCG measurement is greater than 3000mIU/ml. Under this condi­tion, a viable intrauterine pregnancy is possible but unlikely, and treatment can be initiated, espe­cially if a repeat β-hCG level conrms the rst one. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology has recently endorsed this conserva­tive approach without giving a specic discrimi­natory β-hCG level, as each institution should have their own based on the level of expertise, as well as laboratory thresholds, and ultrasound capabilities [2].
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 L. A. Stadtmauer, I. Tur-Kaspa (eds.), Ultrasound Imaging in Reproductive Medicine,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16699-1_23
369
370
L. Detti
A true gestational sac within one side of the endometrial echo is a reliable sign of intrauterine pregnancy; however, an astute clinician must always have concern for life-threatening concur­rent ectopic pregnancy (heterotopic) or preg­nancy loss. In the presence of an uncertain situation, the clinician must decide what signs and symptoms are normal or abnormal in early pregnancy.
Embryonal Landmarks andTemporal Appearance
Transvaginal ultrasound (TUS) features high­resolution images, low interobserver variability, and high reliability and is conventionally used to make diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy and to follow up with its development. Gestational sac, yolk sac, crown-rump length, heart rate, and amniotic sac are the features evaluated to assess the early pregnancy.
Gestational Sac (GS)
It is the rst structure to develop from the implanted embryo, and it is present as early as 4
complete weeks’ gestation. By TUS, it can be visualized as an echoic ring (trophectoderm) sur­rounding an anechoic center (uid), embedded in one side of the endometrium (eccentric). Typically, it is measured by averaging the three diameters in the two orthogonal planes (Hellman’s method), but more recently it is measured by only the largest diameter (Rempen’s method). The algorithm in the individual ultrasound machines will calculate the gestational age based on one of the two methods. Figure23.1 shows the correct measurement of a GS based on three diameters in the two orthogonal planes. The GS’s average diameter grows linearly during the rst 12weeks of pregnancy. This trend has been conrmed by cross-sectional [3], as well as longitudinal [4], studies. Figure23.2a shows the GS growth based on longitudinal data from 193 pregnancies that ended in live birth.
Yolk Sac (YS)
The secondary YS is the second structure to develop, together with the embryo; however, in most instances it is the rst of the two to be visu­alized. It should always be visualized when the GS is greater than 8 mm in diameter [5]. It is
Fig. 23.1 Measurement of a gestational sac in the two orthogonal planes. Six weeks and 3days– normal GS
Gestational Sac Yolk Sac
Crown-Rump Length (mm)
OngoingOngoing
ab
cd
23 Early Pregnancy Ultrasound
371
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
45678
GS Average Diameter (cm)
Gestational age (weeks)
910
Ongoing
5
4
3
2.2
2
1
Diameter (mm)
0
5
3
2.7
2.6
678910
Gestational age (weeks)
Ongoing
3.8
4.4
Crown-Rump Length Heart Rate
40
30
20
10
0
5 678910
10
Gestational age (weeks)
200
160
120
80
40
Heart Rate (BPM)
0
5 67 8910
Gestational age (weeks)
Fig. 23.2 Ultrasonographic measurement of various parameters during the rst 10 weeks of pregnancy. (a) Gestational
Sac; (b) Yolk Sac; (c) CRL, or Crown-Rump Length; (d) Heart Rate
ab
Fig. 23.3 (a) Correct measurement of the yolk sac. (b) A misshapen yolk sac
measured placing the cursor from the inner rim to the opposite inner rim, and, if misshapen, the
Embryo andCrown-Rump Length (CRL)
three dimensions in the two orthogonal planes should be averaged. The YS grows linearly dur­ing the rst 10weeks of pregnancy, 0.44mm per week (Fig.23.2b) [6], and is then progressively distanced from the embryo by the developing amniotic sac. Figure 23.3 shows a normal YS with the correct measurement (a) and a mis­shapen YS (b).
The embryo develops together with the second­ary yolk sac; however, because of its discoid shape and the adjacent yolk sac, it is not easily visualized until almost 6 weeks’ gestation. Between 5 and 6 complete weeks’ gestation, the embryo assumes a tubular shape, and, as the neu­ral tube is sealed on both ends, it gradually
372
ab
L. Detti
assumes a C-shaped conformation. At this time the amniotic sac becomes visible as a translucent membrane projecting from the embryo’s stalk within the GS.Until 53days (=9.4weeks’ ges­tation), the caudal portion of the embryo is the tail. Only after 60days (=10.5weeks’ gestation) does the head become the most cephalad portion of the embryo/fetus. This means that until 11 weeks’ gestation, we measure the longest fetal diameter rather than the real CRL. Nonetheless, measuring the CRL is the most reliable way to date a pregnancy when the
last menstrual period is not known. In addition, when in the rst trimester the estimated gesta­tional age by CRL differs greater than ±7days from the gestational age by LMP, the estimated date of delivery should be changed.
From 6 to 9.4weeks, the CRL grows approxi­mately 1 mm/day [3, 4], as seen in Fig. 23.2c. Figure23.4 shows an ultrasound picture (a) and an electronic microscopy picture (b), of an embryo at 5 weeks’ gestation. As seen, the embryo is still discoid and the secondary YS is adjacent to the embryo. Figure 23.5 shows the
Fig. 23.4 Ultrasound (a) and electronic microscopy (b) images of a 5weeks’ gestation embryo
ab
Fig. 23.5 Measurement of the CRL at 6 weeks and 3 days’ (a) and at 8weeks’ gestation (b)
23 Early Pregnancy Ultrasound
Fig. 23.6 M-mode for measurement of embryonal heart rate at 6weeks and 4days’ gestation
373
correct CRL measurement and the embryonal stalk at 6weeks’ and at 8weeks’ gestation.
Embryonal Heart Rate (EHR)
The heart starts contracting to propel blood before it is fully formed during the third week of embryonal life or 5weeks’ gestation. The rate of its contractions (beats per minute = BPM) is slow in the beginning, and it progressively increases until 8 complete weeks, when it reaches approximately 180 BPM [7]. Between 5 and 6weeks, the EHR is about 100 BPM; how­ever, it could be slower (Fig.23.2d). Figure23.6 shows the M-mode technique to measure the EHR. The Doppler technique to measure the EHR should not be used until after the comple­tion of the rst trimester of pregnancy, to avoid overheating of the delicate embryonal structures and possible development of congenital defects and/or intrauterine growth restriction [in accor­dance with the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle] [8]. EHR increases expo­nentially from 5 to 8 complete weeks’ gestation,
and it then decreases to reach a plateau of 140– 150 BPM at 15weeks’.

Pregnancy Dating

Of the parameters previously described, the only one that has proven reliability and reproducibility to determine a pregnancy’s age is the CRL.When an EHR is present, the CRL measurement can reliably diagnose the gestational age. However, if EHR is absent and the CRL measures less than 7mm (7weeks’ gestation), it becomes critical to assess the presence of the AS. Since the AS becomes visible on ultrasound at 7weeks’ gesta­tion, even if the CRL measures 5 or 6 complete weeks’ gestation, the presence of an AS would date a pregnancy at least at 7weeks’. Figure23.7 shows an example of a pregnancy lost at 7weeks and 2days, with the CRL measuring 5.6mm: the CRL would date the pregnancy at 6weeks and 3days; however, the presence of the AS dates the pregnancy to after 7weeks’. The “double-bleb” sign, initially described as a sign of genetically abnormal pregnancy, actually represents the yolk
374
Fig. 23.7 The double-bleb sign made of the yolk sac and
the amniotic sac with a faintly visualized embryo in between
sac (left “bleb”) and the AS (right “bleb”) with the embryo faintly visualized in between. These ndings characterize a new concept of growth restriction in the rst trimester, which could be important in establishing the causes of a pregnancy loss, especially in the instance of recurrent early pregnancy loss.
Diagnosis ofPlacental Location
During implantation, the embryo penetrates the functional layer of the endometrium with the inner cell mass facing its basal layer. Upon contact, the cytotrophoblast, the outer cell layer of the blastocyst, starts proliferating to create the trophoblastic shell. This shell is comprised of a cytotrophoblast layer with intermingled syncytial cells, which then coalesce to form the syncytiotrophoblast [9]. During the third week of embryo development, or 5weeks gestation, the cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast form the villous chorion. At this point, embryonic blood begins to ood the villi via the umbilical arteries through the embryonal stalk, which will progressively elongate to form the umbilical cord. The embryonal blood causes development of the chorionic villi located above the basal decidua, which will then anchor the chorion frondosum with the apposed amnion.
L. Detti
Traditionally, placental location is identied by TUS after 8weeks gestation, when the pla­centa forms by anchoring the chorion frondosum with the apposed amnion in the basal decidua [10]. The circulation in the chorion frondosum starts becoming prominent, thus appearing hyperechogenic on ultrasound and allowing its localization in relationship to the uterine wall [11]. Placental location has also been visualized using power Doppler before 10weeks of gesta­tion, at which point scattered vessels can be identied surrounding the gestational sac [12]. However, identication of embryonal stalk, and thus future location of the chorion frondosum and the placenta, is possible via ultrasound by 5–6weeks gestation, and its reliability has been conrmed by a pioneer study by our group [13]. In fact, placental location diagnosed at 5 or 6 weeks of gestation was consistent with the location on mid-pregnancy ultrasound in 100% of the 111 singleton and twin pregnancies stud­ied, even if in 21.2% of the cases the placenta had moved to an adjacent location (i.e., from fundal, it became anterior or posterior by the second trimester scan). Figure 23.8 shows pla­cental location diagnosis on the two orthogonal planes, and Fig. 23.9 shows 3D renderings of 6 weeks and 3 days and 7 weeks and 5 days pregnancies.
Placental location has a signicant impact on pregnancy outcome and on maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Early identication of placenta previa allows clinicians to more closely follow the pregnancy, thus reducing risk of low neonatal weight, postpartum hemorrhage, gesta­tional hypertension, and preterm labor and deliv­ery [11, 14, 15]. In the case of cesarean section scar pregnancies, which are on the rise with increasing incidence of cesarean deliveries and which constitute 6.4% of ectopic pregnancies [16], the risk of morbid adherence to the anterior wall of the uterus and the posterior wall of the bladder is considered so high that termination of pregnancy is recommended [17]. Thus, early knowledge of placental location allows the clini-
23 Early Pregnancy Ultrasound
375
Fig. 23.8 Antero-left placenta at 5weeks and 1day pregnancy. CP, chorionic plate
Fig. 23.9 3D renderings of an intrauterine pregnancy at 6 weeks and 3 days’ (a) and one at 7 weeks and 5 days’ gesta-
tion (b)
cian to identify potential risks and counsel the patient accordingly. Similarly, knowing the site of the placenta in the presence of uterine subsep­tations can help in counseling the patient about
the possible pregnancy outcome. Figure 23.10 shows a subseptate uterus with the GS on the right of the subseptation and the placenta implanted in the right lateral wall.
376
Fig. 23.10 Subseptate uterus with the GS on the right of
the subseptation and the placenta implanted in the right lateral wall

Pregnancy Viability

Early pregnancy loss, or failed pregnancy, or mis­carriage is dened as a nonviable, intrauterine pregnancy with either an empty gestational sac or a gestational sac containing an embryo or fetus without fetal heart activity within the rst 12 com­plete weeks of gestation [18]. It is the most com­mon complication of early pregnancy, affecting as many as 30% of pregnancies following assisted reproduction technology [19]. In spontaneous pregnancies, the reported incidence of miscarriage is lower, about 10% [20, 21]. The difference is probably due to the fact that spontaneous preg­nancy is clinically recognized at a later time than assisted reproduction ones, and an early miscar­riage is easily missed. Vaginal bleeding is a com­mon sign of early pregnancy failure; however, it can be confused with a delayed menstruation and remains undiagnosed. Chromosomal abnormali­ties are the cause of a miscarriage in greater than 50% of the times, and aneuploidy is the most fre­quently observed abnormality [22, 23]. Changes in the ultrasound features have been alternatively investigated to predict pregnancy outcome and in particular miscarriage. Logistic regression models including large numbers of pregnancies identied maternal age, HR, CRL, and vaginal bleeding as the most signicant prognostic variables to predict a miscarriage in both spontaneous [24] and invitro fertilization pregnancies [25]. However, the mod­els were not specic for a denite gestational age
L. Detti
and included parameters, such as maternal age, which, alone, is a well-established risk factor for rst trimester miscarriage [26]. A recent system­atic review summarized sensitivities and specici­ties for the ultrasound parameters and found an EHR 110 BPM to be the most reliable one to predict a subsequent miscarriage, with a sensitiv­ity of 68.4%, a specicity of 97.8%, a positive likelihood ratio of 31.7 (95% condence interval
12.8–78.8), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.32 (95% condence interval 0.16–0.65) [27]. In women with an HR110 BPM and vaginal bleed­ing, all the statistics increased, indicating enhanced predictability. It was also reported that, in addition to CRL, GS, and EHR, below the 5th percentile, a YS diameter above the 95th percentile was predic­tive of early miscarriage (odds ratio 1.04); how­ever, a normal YS did not decrease the risk of miscarriage, if the other parameters were abnor­mal [28]. Other studies have indicated an enlarged YS to be associated with miscarriage, while an abnormal YS shape was not predictive [5, 29, 30].
All the markers established as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, however, have always been evaluated cross-sectionally with only one ultrasound per patient [5, 24, 25, 2730]. Our group performed a longitudinal study of all the early pregnancy landmarks. In this study multiple ultrasounds were performed to accurately repre­sent all gestational ages in each patient. This allowed us to obtain longitudinal data in the same patient, further strengthening our study. We previ­ously described a nomogram of YS development during the rst 10weeks of pregnancy with serial ultrasounds (Fig.23.11a) [6]. After 5weeks’ ges­tation, the YS reliably detects pregnancies that will end in miscarriage. In these pregnancies, the YS was either smaller or larger than in ongoing pregnancies. While all pregnancies with large YS miscarried within 10 weeks, some pregnancies with smaller YS miscarried beyond the rst 10 weeks of pregnancy. In a subsequent study which combined all rst trimester parameters, the same group established that YS and GS are the earliest parameters that can be reliably used as a prognostic factor for poor pregnancy outcome later in the rst trimester, as they become abnor­mal as early as 6weeks of gestation, even if the actual loss occurs after 8weeks [4]. Figure23.11 shows the changes of the early pregnancy land-