Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_999_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
436
https://t.me/med1917
The SMA arises anteriorly from the abdominal aorta, just below the coeliac artery, at around the level of L1. It has the widest calibre of the three arteries and its downwards sloping angle of origin makes it the most susceptible to embolic occlu­sion. The SMA supplies the duodenum from the ampulla of Vater to the distal third of the transverse colon. Numerous branches arise from the SMA to supply the bowel, and these form anastomotic arcades in the mesentery. From these arcades, the vasa recta arise which directly supply the ileal and jejunal walls. There are fewer jejunal arterial arcades, making the jejunum more vulnerable to ischaemic injury compared to the ileum (Fig.26.1b).
The IMA has the smallest calibre of the three major arteries and arises from the anterior abdominal aorta at the level of L3. It supplies the distal two-thirds of the transverse colon, the descending and sigmoid colon, and supplies the upper two­thirds of the rectum (Fig.26.1c). The marginal artery of Drummond along the large bowel can also be helpful in circumstances of embolism or stenoses.
Anatomical Variants
Both the SMA and coeliac artery can arise as a single trunk from the aorta (coelia­comesenteric trunk), or the SMA can arise from the common hepatic artery. The Arc of Riolan is a possibility for collateral ow in the event of occlusion, and in these cases, the splenic exure can be spared [9].
L. R. Howroyd et al.
Venous Anatomy
The portal venous system and the inferior vena cava should be considered. The portal venous system transports nutrient rich blood from the bowel to the liver for processing. At the level of the bowel, the veins are paired in the mesentery with the arteries. The SMV and splenic vein converge at the portovenous or portomesenteric conuence and form the portal vein.
General Pathophysiology ofAMI
The development of AMI depends on several factors, including how many vessels are involved, the level at which the vascular occlusion occurs, the quality of the available arterial collateral network, and crucially, the duration of interrupted arte­rial supply. Ischaemic injury develops when there is insufcient delivery of oxygen and nutrients required to support cellular metabolism. The bowel is thought to be able to tolerate major reduction in mesenteric blood ow for up to 3h without sub­stantial injury [10, 11].
26 Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Imaging andIntervention
https://t.me/med1917
In the initial stages of hypoxic injury, the mucosa is affected rst and if the vas­cular obstruction is relieved rapidly, injured cells may recover. If the hypoxia per­sists, the submucosa, muscularis propria and eventually serosa become involved, with oedema, haemorrhage and necrosis occurring. Once the muscularis is affected, the ischaemia is called transmural and is irreversible. This can occur in as little as 6h in cases of complete vascular obstruction [12]. Once the bowel wall is infarcted, bacterial translocation leads to gangrene, peritonitis, sepsis and multi-organ failure.
The most important prognostic factor is the duration of inadequate blood supply [13]. Therefore rapid diagnosis and effective intervention are fundamental to an improved outcome.
437
General Management Principles
The management of AMI is primarily focussed on restoring adequate blood ow to the mesenteric vessels and treating any identiable underlying causes. Adequate resuscitation and anticoagulation if appropriate are early steps in any case.
With the advent and continuing evolution of image-guided endovascular proce­dures, the open surgery is not obligatory anymore, as treatment options are expanding.
Mesenteric Arterial Embolism (MAE)
This is the most common cause of AMI, accounting for approximately 33–50% of cases [4, 14]. The most common origin of the emboli is cardiac, with around 50% of patients presenting with MAE having atrial brillation (AF) [8]. Related risk fac­tors include recent myocardial infarct, known cardiac thrombi, mitral valve disease and previous embolic disease.
Pathophysiology
Due to its wide calibre and narrow take off angle from the aorta, the SMA is particu­larly vulnerable to embolic events. Usually, the embolus lodges in the proximal SMA approximately 3–10 cm beyond the vessel origin as it tapers in calibre at around the level of the middle colic artery branch [1517]. When this occurs, the proximal branches of the SMA remain patent and therefore the proximal jejunum remains partially perfused, whereas the distal jejunum and ileum are vulnerable to ischaemia [18, 19].
438
https://t.me/med1917
L. R. Howroyd et al.
Clinical Presentation
The typical presentation is with sudden and severe abdominal pain. Nausea, vomit­ing, tachycardia and hypotension may ensue. Abdominal guarding and rebound ten­derness suggest that bowel gangrene is already occurring.
Mesenteric Arterial Thrombus (MAT)
Accounts for approximately 25–30% of cases [4, 5], often in association with coro­nary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, or diabetic arteriopathy.
Due to the chronic nature of the underlying cause, there is usually a well­established collateral arterial supply, and ischaemia usually only develops when two of the three major mesenteric arteries suffer severe stenosis or occlusion (usually the coeliac artery and SMA).
Alternatively, ischaemia can develop in the absence of complete occlusion in the setting of generalised reduction in blood ow to the bowel, for example, in states of hypotension or low cardiac output.
Given that the patients with MAT tend to be older, with multiple co-morbidities, and a larger portion of the bowel is affected, the prognosis of MAT is worse when compared to MAE [5].
Clinical Presentation
As there is a sudden obstruction to an already stenosed artery, the typical presenta­tion is that of an acute exacerbation of pain on a background of longstanding abdominal angina. However previous angina is not obligatory, and new onset of pain can be the only evidence of the trouble.
Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis (MVT)
Incidence andRisk Factors
MVT accounts for 5–11% of cases [4, 5]. Of all the causes of AMI detailed here, this has the youngest peak age of onset. In up to 75% of these patients a background derangement is present [20].
Approximately 50% of patients have a history of previous venous thrombus, that is a deep vein thrombus (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE) [21]. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in general are risk factors for MVT, such as oral contra­ceptive pill use and pregnancy [22]. Portal hypertension, hypercoagulable states
26 Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Imaging andIntervention
https://t.me/med1917
(e.g. inherited diseases such as Factor V Leiden and antiphospholipid syndrome), intraabdominal infection, intraabdominal inammation (e.g. pancreatitis), malig­nancy, and abdominal trauma or recent surgery are all common risk factors.
Pathophysiology
Propensity to thrombosis is classically attributed to a combination of Virchow’s triad (stagnant ow, hypercoagulability and endothelial damage). The above risk factors/secondary causes can all be understood within this framework. Thrombosis starts in the intramural venules, vasa recta and venous arcades [20]. The SMV and ileal loops it drains are most affected, with the IMV and colon rarely affected, thought in part due to collateral ow in the pelvic systemic veins making the IMV less vulnerable.
Bowel wall oedema and luminal distention in the affected bowel are the conse­quence. The oedema and distention lead to increased tissue pressure and the arterial inow is compromised, thus leading to ischaemia. MVT may not necessarily cause intestinal infarction, instead collateral venous drainage can form. Chronic venous thrombosis can lead to raised portal venous pressures (portal hypertension) and dilated venous collaterals, prone to bleeding.
439
Clinical Presentation
Typically, there is a subacute presentation with abdominal pain over a period of days to weeks.
Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischaemia
NOMI accounts for 15–20% of cases of AMI [4, 5].It classically occurs in critically unwell or physiologically vulnerable patients. Notably, it complicates 0.5–1% of all cardiac operations [23] and heart failure is a strong risk factor. Cocaine use has also been identied in younger patients presenting with NOMI [24].
Pathophysiology
NOMI used to be attributed to prolonged and severe mesenteric arterial spasm; however, hypoperfusion with no spasm seems to be the major driver. This is a poorly understood phenomenon typically occurring in critically ill patients with deranged tissue perfusion. The combination of the often vulnerable physiological state of the patient with the difculties in identifying and treating NOMI effectively lead to a mortality rate of NOMI of around 50% [25, 26].
440
https://t.me/med1917
Presentation
NOMI is difcult to identify as patients are usually already very unwell or post surgical, and as such are likely intubated and ventilated, unable to communicate any symptoms, and the signs can be masked. It should be suspected in any critically unwell patient with a sudden and unexpected deterioration. If the patient is con­scious, this may be in the form of nonspecic pain, bloating and nausea and acute confusion. If the patient is sedated, the warning signs include an unexplained meta­bolic acidosis and need for more inotropic support.
L. R. Howroyd et al.
Other Causes ofAMI
Arterial Dissection
Approximately 5% of patients with an aortic dissection develop AMI [4, 27].
Fibromuscular Dysplasia (FMD)
FMD is a rare but well-recognised cause of CMI which can develop into MAT. If the patient is not known to have FMD the appearances on imaging are the same as in the more common renal artery manifestation of the disease, with a classically described ‘string of beads’ appearance to the affected arteries [28].
Inammatory
Takayasu’s arteritis and Ehlers Danlos syndrome have both been reported as causes for AMI [29, 30]. Cases of trauma, retroperitoneal brosis, abdominal coarctation, neurobromatosis and post irradiation arteritis have all been identied as possible causes for AMI [27].
Diagnostic Imaging
Double or Triple-Phase CT with CT Angiography
CT can distinguish between AMI and other causes of abdominal pain, as well as demonstrate specic features of causes of AMI.Furthermore, CT is key in estab­lishing potential options for management, in planning endovascular procedures, or
26 Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Imaging andIntervention
https://t.me/med1917
identifying irreversible damage which will indicate that the situation cannot be rectied by simply restoring mesenteric blood ow and will require open surgical resection.
441
Contrast-Enhanced Phases
The contrast given in CT contains iodine, which absorbs X-rays differently to tis­sues in the body and appears denser or brighter on the acquired images, acting to highlight the vessels or organ it is in. Altering the time delay between when the contrast is given intravenously and when the CT is then acquired gives different phases of imaging.
Arterial Phase
A time delay of 20–40s will result in an arterial phase scan, where the contrast is mainly in the abdominal aorta and mesenteric arteries. This is often known as a CT Angiogram (CTA) and in AMI will enable assessment for intravascular lling defects. In cases of AMI the sensitivity for CTA alone is as much as 93.3% and the specicity 95.9% [31].
Portal Venous Phase
If the interval between contrast administration and image acquisition is delayed to 60–90s, the contrast bolus has had time to pass through the capillary beds and is within the mesenteric venous system. This phase provides information about end­organ perfusion and allows for assessment of venous patency.
Enteric Contrast Administration
Administration of oral or per rectum contrast has no role in suspected cases of AMI.High-density contrast in the lumen of the bowel can mask features of ischaemia.
Unenhanced/Non-contrast Phase
A possible pitfall with contrast-enhanced images is differentiating structures that are inherently dense, like calcium in atherosclerotic plaque, with iodine contrast. To differentiate between contrast and pre-existing densities, an unenhanced scan before any contrast is given is necessary. In AMI, this enables detection of vascular calci­cation or high-density intravascular thrombus that may be masked by contrast administration.
442
https://t.me/med1917
L. R. Howroyd et al.
If these three phases are acquired in the same study, non-contrast or unenhanced, arterial and portal venous phases, this is known as a triple-phase study. The down­side is that the three phases require three separate acquisitions through the scanner, and so the dose of ionising radiation is greater. Techniques such as dual-energy CT and iodine mapping can further increase accuracy in diagnosis of AMI [32].
In suspected cases of AMI, a clinical conversation with the radiologist in the vet­ting process facilitates appropriate protocolling of the study. A decision can be made about whether a single phase, for example, just an arterial (i.e., just a CTA) or just a portal venous phase study is sufcient to make the diagnosis, or whether a triple phase will enable more detailed conclusions to be drawn.
CT inAMI
General CT Features
Bowel wall thickening is the most common nding in AMI representing mural oedema, haemorrhage, or infection but this is not specic to AMI and is seen in other scenarios such as inammation [33]. Importantly, not all causes of AMI result in bowel wall thickening. Indeed, in cases of complete arterial occlusion, the bowel wall can be thinned [34]. Wall thickening is most prominent in cases of MVT, and in cases of MAE and MAT wall thickening is usually only seen once the perfusion has been restored. [35]
Bowel wall enhancement patterns are variable. High density on the unenhanced phase is indicative of intramural haemorrhage. High density on the contrast­enhanced images is indicative of congestion or reperfusion. A target or halo appear­ance is the classical description.
Reduced bowel wall enhancement is specic, but not sensitive for ischaemia [36]. In arterial causes, decreased enhancement will occur early and is not necessar­ily indicative of irreversible ischaemia. Conversely, in venous causes decreased enhancement occurs late and is more indicative of irreversible ischaemia [37].
The presence of mesenteric stranding is also variable and does not correlate with the severity of ischaemia. Stranding is more prominent in MVT and NOMI, and if present in arterial causes of occlusion, it is a later sign and may indicate more advanced irreversible ischaemia [34].
Features ofAdvanced Ischaemia
An important role of CT is in identifying advanced and likely irreversible isch­aemia. Imaging features of this are ileus, with bowel wall dilatation being the best predictor of transmural necrosis in arterial occlusions [38]. Thinning of the bowel wall indicative of muscular and neurological ischaemia is highly specic [37]. Late signs are intramural gas (pneumatosis intestinalis) and portal venous gas. Free intra­peritoneal air is another late sign signifying perforation (Fig.26.2).
26 Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Imaging andIntervention
https://t.me/med1917
a
b
443
Fig. 26.2 Features of advanced mesenteric ischemia. (a), (b) and (c) are contrast-enhanced axial CT images. (a) Distended, uid-lled small bowel loops indicating adynamic ileus (white arrow­heads). These loops show absent mural enhancement and paper-thin bowel wall. Note non­distended small bowel loops in the right hemipelvis showing normal bowel wall thickness and enhancement (white arrows). (b) Circumferential small bowel pneumatosis (white arrowheads). (c) A large locule of gas within the left portal vein (white arrow) with gas-lled peripheral portal vein branches in the anterior liver (white arrowheads)
c
444
https://t.me/med1917
L. R. Howroyd et al.
Specic Features oftheSubtypes ofAMI
MAE: emboli may be visualised as high-density material within the arterial lumen
on the unenhanced CT, or as either luminal lling defects or an abrupt transition to completely non-opacied artery on the arterial phase CT.As described above, the SMA is the most affected vessel due to its anatomy. CT in these patients may reveal further emboli elsewhere, such as the peripheral arteries causing limb ischaemia, or in solid abdominal organs—causing hepatic, splenic, or renal infarcts. The vascular territory affected will determine the segments of bowel that are affected (Fig.26.3).
MAT: Calcication at the ostia of the major splanchnic vessels is typical in ath­erosclerotic disease and can point towards MAT as a potential underlying cause. Arterial stenosis or occlusion is well-visualised in arterial phase imaging. However acute and chronic occlusion can look identical and can only be reliably distin­guished if there are bowel or mesenteric changes suggestive of acute ischaemia. Additionally, the clinical picture must be considered when differentiating the two (Fig.26.4).
MVT: In >90% of cases [39] a lling defect is evident in the portal venous sys- tem on a portal venous phase CT.Additional features include mural rim enhance­ment in the wall of the vein at the site of thrombus, mesenteric engorgement and ascites. Prominent bowel wall thickening reecting marked mural oedema is not uncommon (Fig.26.5).
a
Fig. 26.3 Features of mesenteric arterial embolism. (a) Coronal arterial phase CT showing an occlusive lling defect within the SMA lodged at the orice of the middle colic artery (white arrow) with poorly enhancing ileal loops in the right lower abdomen. Note that the proximal jeju­nal branches remain patent (white arrowhead) and the jejunal loops in the left upper abdomen have preserved normal enhancement. (b) Axial arterial phase CT shows a lling defect within the SMA with a characteristic peripheral rim of enhancement representing contrast between the embolus and the vessel wall (white arrow)
b
26 Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Imaging andIntervention
https://t.me/med1917
445
a
c
b
d
Fig. 26.4 Intervention for mesenteric arterial thrombus. (a) Sagittal arterial phase CT showing non-occlusive lling defect within the proximal SMA (white arrowheads). The origin of the coe­liac axis is patent (white arrow). (b) Lateral projection digital subtraction angiogram performed via a ush catheter in the abdominal aorta. Proximal SMA non-occlusive thrombus is again demon­strated (white arrowheads). The proximal celiac axis is again shown to be patent (white arrow). (c) Angiogram performed after suction thrombectomy shows improved patency of proximal SMA and its branches but with residual vessel wall irregularity (white arrowheads) and an underlying steno­sis in the proximal SMA (white arrow). (d) Completion angiogram performed following deploy­ment of a balloon-expandable metal stent in the proximal SMA (white arrowheads) showing signicantly improved vessel calibre and ow
NOMI: NOMI is a diagnosis of exclusion, and occlusive causes must be actively ruled out. Classically the distribution of the bowel ischaemia is segmental and dis­continuous and there is no occlusive cause evident. Watershed areas tend to be affected rst, and arterial diameters tend to be particularly small [5, 33, 34, 40].